Slashdot Mirror


Ideas For Your Next Tech Startup

prostoalex writes "Business 2.0 magazine enumerates tech ideas that venture capitalists are currently interested in, listing the amounts they have ready to invest." From the article:"A column that appeared on Business2.com the next day described the company Armstrong envisioned and his wish list of criteria. Those who thought they had the right stuff could send Armstrong a business plan. A few weeks later, Armstrong had a new gripe: He'd received more than 20 solid plans and couldn't decide which of three finalists he wanted to fund -- not just for $1 million, but for as much as $5 million. He has since winnowed the list down to two. That got us thinking. Why not ask dozens of VCs a tantalizing (but often unasked) question: What types of ideas would you fund tomorrow if the right pitch landed on your doorstep? After a few weeks of trolling Sand Hill Road and beyond, we got 11 leading venture firms to spill their most promising business ideas -- and to pony up $50 million in funding to the entrepreneurs who can pull them off. "

50 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm thinking mp3 player + SMS + ringtones + java

    wait, it needs something...

    XML!

    Alright, I got it, an mp3 player that doubles as a text messaging device. Instead of beeps, it plays ringtones you pick from your mp3 player. Java makes cool games possible. XML makes it seem cool to those who don't realize it just means humans can read the tags I will hide with DRM thus playacting the RIAA thinking people can't pirate ringtones.

    I think I'm on to something...

    1. Re:Hmm by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Informative

      Three words:

      Mitac Mio A701.

      I want one. :)

      It also does GPS. :)

  2. How ironic. by priestx · · Score: 3, Funny

    The last time we were talking about Tech Startups, people were complaining about Google picking up all the most potential ones. Then what do I see when I post? A Google ad. Of course there was a Google ad the last time we talked about this... but still..

    --
    "To be is to do." -Socrates
    "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
    "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
  3. It's just because... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
    These guys need a place to put their money, and avoid paying taxes on it "while it's doing some work," again.

    "One more bubble, and we retire with half-a-billion."

    Tiresome. The ideas are as fruitless as before - many more of us will go broke working 75 hour weeks, while big investors walk off with a tax break, if not the rewards for effort.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:It's just because... by fireman+sam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "many more of us will go broke working 75 hour weeks, while big investors walk off with a tax break, if not the rewards for effort."

      It is not the effort, it is the risk that is rewarded. "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."

      By working your 75 hours per week you are secure that you will receive a set amount of money. You have a low risk. VCs give their money to startups in the hope of receiving a high return, they have a high risk.

      If you want to take chances, there are investment houses that will take you money, pool it with others and then act on your behalf to invest your money based on the amount of risk you are prepared to take.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    2. Re:It's just because... by ucblockhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. I worked for a dotcom. I suspect the investors lost a substantial part of their investment. On the other hand, I got a good salary and free snacks. Sure, I'd have much rather we succeeded, but all I lost was hours worked and potential stock options.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    3. Re:It's just because... by Telastyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Low risk. Right. Perhaps you're looking at different startups than I am but standard employees often work those 75 hours a week for:

      - generally rock bottom salary.
      - the chance that even that will disappear on a moment's notice.
      - perhaps some stock options that are unlikely to ever be worth more than the bits they're taking up in some HR database
      - the possibility of having that startup's failure emblazened upon your resume for the rest of your days [more important for execs, but still]

      And that ignores all of the social risks taken by spending that much time at your job and not with your mate/kids/friends.

      Not to say that investors aren't risking a bit, but to steal a tidbit of wisdom from the poker world, "100 chips is a lot more valuable to a man with 100 chips than a man with a thousand."

    4. Re:It's just because... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny
      If you want to take chances, there are investment houses that will take you money, pool it with others and then act on your behalf to invest your money based on the amount of risk you are prepared to take.

      Yes, they're called casinos.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    5. Re:It's just because... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ever get ripped-off with "underwater" options? You know... The 10,000 you were "gifted" with at signing? Pay up the taxes!

      It's a pyramid scheme, like Employee Stock Purchase - which floats up the volume of trades for your company, using you as the captive audience!

      "I'm afraid you can't change your ESPP options until the next enrollment period, after the second quarter..."

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  4. No one wants to pay me by Associate · · Score: 3, Funny

    to sit around playing video games and looking at pr0n all day. Maybe if I open source it somehow.

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
    1. Re:No one wants to pay me by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 2, Funny

      no way dude, i am trying to patent playing video games now.. dont step on my turf or i will have the DMCA after you!

    2. Re:No one wants to pay me by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm forking your project

  5. Yawn. The same old stuff repackaged.. by MrPerfekt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We want our cell phones to do everything and we want to market PCs and content to everybody on the planet. I think that's a decent summary of all the "ideas" there.

    Is it just me or did everything sound incredibly boring?

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    1. Re:Yawn. The same old stuff repackaged.. by t35t0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everything was boring except for the home patient monitoring system. As the VC says, interfacing the monitoring system to the hospital will be the difficult part because not only do the systems not exist, but neither does the network infrastructure.

      Most of the systems at hospitals are closed off. That is, an ECG or pulse oximeter may only be sending data directly to a monitoring station or hub where nurses are stationed 24/7, so it's a very small internal system.

      1) Use the current monitoring systems available at hospitals for the most part. 2) Build a back-end at the hospital to interface to their current monitoring station and to receive data from various locations from people's houses. 3) Profit!

    2. Re:Yawn. The same old stuff repackaged.. by nicklott · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Venture Capitalists are people with money but no ideas. If they had money AND ideas they'd be doing it themselves.

      Asking VCs the specifics of what they want to invest in is pointless; they don't know. What they do (or should) know is a good idea when they see it.

    3. Re:Yawn. The same old stuff repackaged.. by RyanGWU82 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a mistake to think of a successful company being the product of (1) a concept and (2) some capital. There really are three parts: the idea, the capital, and the execution. The execution is probably the most important factor on whether a company will succeed or fail. Eric Sink wrote it best (most provocatively?) when he claimed that ideas are worthless in an essay last year.

      Look at Joel Spolsky (Joel on Software): he makes a bug tracker. Not a very novel idea. But he does it well, so his company is profitable and revenues are growing quickly. There are thousands of other companies out there doing the same thing. Proctor & Gamble doesn't sell anything particularly unique, they just do it well. And there are a hundred "low-cost" airlines out there, but JetBlue and Southwest are profitable because they've executed the idea correctly.

      Venture capitalists are people with money and who choose not to execute on any ideas directly. There's nothing wrong with that. I don't know many people that would truly want to put in the effort required to create a winning technology startup.

  6. I got the best idea. by scruff323 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got an idea that is sure to be a hit.

    A news web site, but not just any news site. One that has a witty address and is directed towards technology. It will be a kind of news for nerds, you know... stuff that matters. It is sure to be a hit!

    1. Re:I got the best idea. by tjr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, would never read such a site. And I certainly would not participate in any user discussions about the news.

  7. Yoda says by Quixote · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... begin, the next dotcom bubble has.

    1. Re:Yoda says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Say that, Yoda did not. Respect verb tense, Yoda does. Return to school, you should.

  8. Weak! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I dunno. Not impressed. Maybe the banking stuff is OK but the "home monitoring" idea is complete BS. This guy is asking for a remote vital sign monitoring machine - which really ought to be easy to do - and would end up being pretty worthless.

    Disclaimer - I'm a physician. I can't really see a use for being able to know what a patient's vital signs are for someone "needing" to be in the hospital. In fact, according to recent insurance guidelines, if all you're doing is checking vital signs, you will not get paid for said hospitalization. Reminds me of a recent slashdot article about some bizzarre japanese medico-toilet which analyzed your various outputs and told your doctor about it.

    I sure don't want to here about that.

    Administering meds? IVs? Enemas? Who you gonna call?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Weak! by shawnmchorse · · Score: 4, Funny

      Administering meds? IVs? Enemas? Who you gonna call?

      Crapbusters? *ducks and runs*

    2. Re:Weak! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of a recent slashdot article about some bizzarre japanese medico-toilet which analyzed your various outputs and told your doctor about it.

      I find canaries cheaper

    3. Re:Weak! by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, this is an old idea with a modern twist. Sort of, "I've fallen and I can't log on!"

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  9. In Soviet Russia... by ktakki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...Sand Hill Road trolls you!

    Seriously, though...

    This isn't a new idea. Twenty years ago, I was trying to raise funds to build a recording studio. A friend of mine, studying for his MBA at Harvard brought me a spiral-bound book that listed VC firms categorized by the fields that they were interested in (e.g., biotech, software, hardware, defense, etc.). All of them were way out of my league, but it made for interesting reading, in a "follow the money" sense.

    Ten years after that, when I was involved in a dot.com startup, we ended up pitching to some of the VC firms listed in that spiral-bound book (on Wall Street, not Sand Hill Road).

    From what I've gathered from the experiences of friends involved with vulture captial funding, it's a last resort, the only option if angel funding, friends and family, and lines of credit don't pan out.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by JollyFinn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah right there is a LOT to gain from that.
      Consider a first few programming class you took. Consider a average guy there. That's what you get when you try to build 25 person team plus all your time will go managing those twenty guys. However consider few nerd friends you got, and thats what you can get if you go for 5 person team. Next thing to consider is the communications thats more or less n style thing. There is only so many independent peaces you can split the application, and still those need to communicate with each other. In the end for us the 25 person team is a LOT worse solution than going for 5 person team.
      I think I'd go for 5 person team at beginning rather than VC:s just to have better productivity and higher code quality.

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  10. Prediction by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of those ideas come to anything.

    The real moneymakers come out of nowhere. If it sounds like something you've heard of, but with maybe a tiny twist...look elsewhere.

    The really amusing thing is that the biggest success in recent times, Google, was simply "we want to do search engines just like everyone else. But we'll do it better".

    What makes real money isn't a hot new idea. It's doing something well. Quality. If I were a VC, that's what I'd be looking for. Competence and pragmatism.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      I agree with your statement that doing something well is the best way to make real money.

      I have had grandiose ideas to build the next "killer app" for 25 years. I have over-engineered all sorts of wacky ideas that never turned into much. I wanted the 200% growth rate per month or whatever took Gates and Ellison to the top.

      Then I struck onto the formula that pays me a couple hundred thousand a year, is helping to fund well-paid jobs for people I have hired, and is growing at a 30% per year rate. Not rocket surgery, just a real simple formula that pays really well (from my perspective), and looks like it will work for some time.

      Pick a simple idea (almost brain-dead idea) that no one is doing very well, but that solves a specific business problem. Something that can be coded in 200 hours or less. Something with about 5000 - 50,000 prospective buyers (not hundreds of millions, not tens). Build your software product simple, but well. One feature really well.

      If the idea doesn't seem stupid to you, the smart geek, then it's not simple enough. It should be one of those "yawn, anyone can do this" idea. The key is, anyone can do it, no one IS doing it. If the idea doesn't seem stupidly simple, simplify it more.

      Practically give away the first one. Market the hell out of it. Aim for ten reference sites (at *give-away* prices), while you improve the product (based on client feedback).

      It's amazing when you share this process with your prospect, how open they are to the idea! "We are just getting into the business, and we are investing in market share, practically giving away the first few, just to get customer feedback and references". Everyone wants a freebie, and wants to somehow be part of a successful up-start.

      We charged "one dollar" to one client, "just so we can call you a customer". People will want to put it in "next year's budget" - we give it to them this year (for $1), under the "gentleman's agreement" that it will be budgeted next year, and purchased if it's any good. Allow your marketing person total freedom in pricing the first ten - incented only on how fast he can get ten "sold". The key is reference-able accounts.

      After ten, price it "to sell" initially (in the under $5000 price range, more like $2000 or $3000 annual fee - you know.. license + installation + annual maintenance). You can raise your prices later, when you have thousands of coder-hours into it. Explain that you're in it for the long haul and plan to expand the solution as others buy.

      Hire a good marketing person and build your base. Once you have ten people at give-away prices, the next ten are "easy" at $6K one-time or 3K annual prices. The next 50 are real easy.

      Soon you have 300+ customers at $3K+ annual. There's your first million (annual).

      Rinse, Repeat.

      No you won't be on the cover of Business Week anytime soon, but you'll get out of the "dream world" of building the next Google, and get into the fun world of making a few bucks, providing jobs for other people, and having fun when you want to. I love knowing that our team is making some good bucks. 25% of my small company (more than 10, less than 20 people) are making 6-figures per year, and they are allowing me to do fairly well, too. 6-figures in middle America isn't bad scratch. No, they're not Microsoft Millionaires, but they aren't complaining either.

      It worked for me. It's bullet #3 in the infamous formula:
      1. blah blah
      2. blah blah
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      No genius here.. but I'd be glad to answer any publicly posted questions on this.

  11. Two Way Authentication... by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why not use a SecurdID Tag/Code with your cell phone and get Kerberos version installed on the cell phones. this way it wouldnt be 100% fraudproof(but then again is anything in life guaranteed?).

    It mentioned SecureID but i wonder if they have heard of Kerberos We have this at work.. you type in your username and password. after the password you use a 4-digit pin number, which gives you a 6 digit key(sometimes referred to as a ticket) to type in at the prompt. If you are really serious about security you could set a time limit on the ticket, lets say 5 or 10 mins, then even if a hacker was trying to hi-jack your ticket it would take more than 5 or 10 mins..but after that the ticket would have expired.

    maybe i should email him and ask him about that, but i am sure they all know about this.

  12. Starting a Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For competitive reasons, I don't want to post this with my real name, but this is a real post from a real guy in the SlashDot community. I've been here for a while (id in the 4x,xxx range).

    Anyways, I started a company by raising US $500,000 through friends and family. I used to be the CTO of an Internet company and decided to start my own company on the Internet but in a different field. I am a techie and an entrepreneur and definitely a geek. Let's put it this way, even today, I write the majority of the software (though I have other developers too).

    The best advice I can give is to watch your cash flow. I was personally horrified by the stories of $200,000 per month burn rates. I actually had a lot of personal wealth (from my last venture) but still ran out of my basement until I needed more space. The US $500,000 lasted us for 2.5 years (not 2.5 months like some companies) after which we raised another $250,000. But we actually had a viable business already with the $500,000 spend. We raised another $250 K to speed up the marketing that we had already proven to know that if we spent X we would get X times 2 back in less than a year. This was based on hard numbers.

    Anyways, I only gave away about 25% of the company to do it, and the company is probably worth about $20 million today and our earnings are growing faster each month.

    We are in the very competitive website builder arena but are one of the top sites in the field. Our focus has been on ease of use first and then secondly on feature set.

    Anyways, I'm mentioning this because I wanted to give those of you who want to start a business hope.

    The absolute worst thing you can do is get into the high-tech business without a model for making money. Pure research or cool ideas are fun but don't bring home the bacon. Remember your market is business people so focus your business plan on how the tech brings in profit. Now how cool the tech is and hence there ought to be profit.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Starting a Company by Infinityis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm...I can't tell if you're Larry Page or Sergey Brin and rounding WAY down, of if you're Paul Graham and rounding your /. id way down (bugbear = 448,726). My bet is Paul Graham...you gave yourself away by putting 8 parenthesis in one post.

    2. Re:Starting a Company by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think his point was along the lines of "there are very few startups that should have 34 employees before they're pulling in any revenue."

      A hardware startup may justify that kind of upfront effort, but I would think most software startups can get a couple versions of their product out in the field before needing to grow to 30+ employees.

  13. 75% Of these ideas are patented by kromozone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have personally overseen the patenting of at least 75% of these ideas. Considering that's just within my own firm, and without a reviews of the prior art, any firms attempting to implement these concepts will probably be faced with serious legal obstacles.

  14. Risk my ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The venture capitalists will never ever face a poor day in their lives. These folks will never have to worry about their mortgages no matter how badly the market falls.


    The people taking risks are your overworked IT employees. Look at your boss the wrong way and you are out on the street. Have you business get bought out and while the owners are flying their golden parachutes, you are wondering where your next paycheck will come from.

    People don't become wealthy by taking risks. They become wealthy by figuring out ways to make lesser folks assume those risks instead.

  15. So the investors come up with the ideas now? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always thought it was up to a smart innovator to pitch an idea to the investor. It would just seem to me thse investors are just beggining to be scammed. I mean anyone can say,"Give me the $3 million dollars, I can do what you are asking for."

  16. Artificial Intelligence Needs Venture Funding by Mentifex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Er, could anybuddy spare a few coins for Open Source Artificial Intelligence?

    You don't even need to fund an unknown AI startup. Just hire some hotshot programmers and Steal.This.Idea!

    It's all described in the scientific literature of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
    Be the first on your block to launch the Hard Takeoff of a Technological Singularity.

    1. Re:Artificial Intelligence Needs Venture Funding by Elektroschock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good idea, but what business can be build up with projects like opencyc?

      http://opehncyc.sf.net/

      Who needs AI? Why do AI solutions not scale? Whenever AI people sell "usable stuff" it is exaggerated. Whenever AI people provide nice stuff you do not know what to do with it.

      where is the japanese 5th generation computer gone?

      Who uses AI expert systems?

      Why isn't there prolog installed on my machine?

      Where are the neuronal network processor chips?

      Why do search engines need no AI semantic net or AI language analysis.

      why is there no fulltext translation tool?

      Why are AI problems usually solved by non-AI methods?

  17. Money Where Your Mouth Is by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there's more of a supply of bizplans than money to fund them, that means there's too much equity to go around. There's then really no excuse for VC not to be investing their money anymore - $TRILLIONS of it is just sitting there, rotting. The only reason they've got is that they still haven't learned how to tell Internet shit from shine-ola. In other words, still not enough brains to go around on the funder side of the table.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Money Where Your Mouth Is by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All this money sitting around with nothing to do says to me that the present distribution of wealth is not doing the economy much good.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  18. Hospitals by Create+an+Account · · Score: 3, Insightful


    You'll play hell getting hospitals to adopt this. Imagine going to the Director and telling him:

    "We want to help your patients save money, by letting them buy less of your services."

    Sure, some hospitals are having a capacity problem, but it's way better to be overbooked than over-capacitied. This is especially bad when you consider the incredible fixed costs they have (think malpractice insurance for 75-150 doctors and a trauma center.)

  19. Cell Phone Auth by ki85squared · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $5M Mobile ID for Credit Card Purchases
    WHAT HE WANTS: Fraudproof credit card authorization via cell phones and PDAs.

    Google could make a cool five million from this since they already use similar technology now when signing up for a Gmail account. (more info on their account creation page)

  20. Really dry by heroine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These proposals sound really dry. It feels like while the rest of the world moved on to robots, spaceflight, and defense, Silicon Valley is still in these really tiny internet experiments from the 90's. Not only are the monetary amounts miniscule, the proposals seem to condense into more networking, more ecommerce, and more tiny parts of something that hang off of something big in Taiwan.

    Indian startups normally get $50 million but they seem to be doing more ambitious projects.

  21. Think about it by slickwillie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you really think these guys would give their really choice ideas for free?

    1. Re:Think about it by rossifer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you really think these guys would give their really choice ideas for free?

      Yes. Everyone has a few great ideas floating around, but very few have what it takes to convert a good idea into a viable enterprise. Being able to lead people, make a plan, ignore the plan, and ultimately being willing to do what it takes to make a success of a good idea are a vanishingly rare set of skills.

      The ideas themselves are a dime a dozen.

      Regards,
      Ross

  22. finally by duplo · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have solved step3) ???

  23. Is this what venture capitalists?" by rush22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that they are really millionaire entrepeneurs looking for business proposals for THEIR idea.

  24. Ideas don't count for very much by Error27 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of people have ideas. Imagine you're a VC and someone proposes an idea and you think it's pretty good. Obviously the first thing you are going to do is see who else is doing similar stuff to gauge the competition.

    If it really is a good idea then there are always going to be a couple other startups doing exactly the same thing. So now the question is should you fund the first guy or not. Or maybe you should fund the competition?

    What really counts is the team. Do they have what it takes to make the idea into a product and beat the competition? A great team can take any idea and adapt it into a profitable company.

  25. Critique by pfafrich · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Oh dear, oh dear, if this is the best VC's can come up with, I pitty America. Most of these ideas will fail for the simple reason that they can't start small and build from there.
    • Mobile ID for Credit Card Purchases. Only workable if it can gain sizable market share, if it gains 5% share its useless. Not suitable for a startup could work for the big players with the resources and contacts to make a global standard.
    • Back Office Bank Syndicate. So your really expecting all the banks to throw away all their code. Persuade banks to turn over their proprietary code to a team of software buffs who will repackage and debug the apps and then sell them as a subscription service to participating members. Is this guy serious?
    • The Ultimate Online Upsell. $5 Million for Software to handle user recomendations to basically do what Amazon does with market cap of $x billion! I guess some companies would by this, but only if it fits with the existing software they have got. I suspect this stuff is already in the included in most packages in the field. Patents anyone?
    • Subscription PC's for Seniors. Could work I know my Mum would just want a PC which works and does the basic stuff. Does not need VC funding as your local PC shop could offer such a service.
    • AN EVEN SMARTER SMARTPHONE. a software platform for cell phones that allows consumers to make purchases or open doors by waving their phones in front of tiny infrared or RFID readers. Security nightmare, steal the phone make the purchace. Breaks fundamental properties of security. Another idea which only works with golbal standards.
    • OPEN-SOURCE IT CENTER. A startup that can create a suite of open-source applications for maintenance and upkeep of a company's IT backbone. It would give away the programs to corporate clients but charge for service and upkeep at a substantial discount off current rates. Redhat? I can see a market for this sort of thing.
    • SOCIAL NETWORKS MEET THE TOWN CRIER. There are a thousand and one site already doing this.
    • CUSTOMER SERVICE OVER IP. Security, basically sending your personel details.
    • Board Now

    The Open Source IT centre did seem useful

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
  26. hey its the mad Mentifex guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  27. Spelling error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The best advice I can give is to watch your cash flow. I was personally horrified by the stories of $200,000 per month burn rates. I actually had a lot of personal wealth (from my last venture) but still ran out of my basement until I needed more space."

    The word is spelled "mom's".