Slashdot Mirror


Molecular Gastronomy, The Science of Cooking

Roland Piquepaille writes "The Art of Cooking is evolving fast in this 21st century. New food products are being designed with the help of molecular technology, genetic discoveries or space research before arriving in our kitchens. For example, here is a Pravda article which says that NASA is preparing sandwiches which will still be edible after seven years. Companies like Kraft are also using nanotechnology to create food products tailored to users' needs. This is a booming market and, according to Associated Press, dozens of universities in the U.S. are offering degrees in culinology, attracting creative students in their food and science programs."

32 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by mfh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    New food products are being designed with the help of molecular technology, genetic discoveries or space research before arriving in our kitchens.

    This is good because eventually we will all want to have food that is chemically efficient for us to digest, without any of the wrong ingredients, but I question the health side of chemical/altered foods.

    I was talking to a chef about a month ago who was complaining about having to put loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo in foods to achieve the taste that the consumer wants, at the expense of their health. "We're paid to kill people," was his complaint, and sadly I think he's right. This same chef was saying how it would be nice if there were alternatives to bad food, that would not jeopardize someone's health. I think that new advancements in science would be the right approach to solving the obesity problem, as long as people are protected from any negative side effects. Natural replacements seem to top this chef's list. He said that the natural foods are the very best for you, so he had little faith in chemicals or engineered food as being healthy for us.

    I've stayed away from garbage food for only a short period and lost nearly 40 pounds of flubber! It's really simple, actually. Most people have a small breakfast, a bigger lunch and a huge dinner. I have a huge breakfast, a smaller lunch and a much smaller dinner (before 6pm usually). I eat from each of the four food groups every day.

    This one cool salad the chef told me about is:
    • Veggies (whatever you want)
    • Salt & Pepper (loads of it unless you have a heart condition)
    • Squeezed Lemon
    The salad tastes like fish & chips with vinegar and salt, so I'm kinda tricking my body into thinking it is getting a load of grease (which all of our bodies crave, because they are stupid bags of carbon and mostly water -- and we all know how well oil and water gets along, don't we?).

    I stay away from oils because they can ruin your whole system, and I think they reinforce our current fatty deposits, by feeding it somehow (it's not that much of a mystery). Once a week I have fat with meat, because the chef said that new fat kills old fat. New fat apparently replaces old fat, and then doesn't congreal as quickly if it's in turn replaced a week later. That doesn't mean overdo it... just a little will do. Apparently people who have been overweight for a long time have very dense fat that must be replaced in order for them to empty fatty deposits eventually.

    My portions are smaller, and I'm not always hungry. I drink as much water as I can every day too, and it helps. I drink tea & coffee, and smoke regularly. I might not be the picture of health, but I am trying. ;-)

    Now if we could only get some fat and tar eating nanoprobes... then we'd really be in business.
    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      suggestion.

      talk to a Nutritionist and not some chef that has a wacked idea on how things work.

      Once a week I have fat with meat, because the chef said that new fat kills old fat.
        that alone is the most bizzare thing I have ever heard.

      guess what, you either need to reduce your caloric intake or do some of the extreme diets to lose weight.

      Atkins works as it thows your body into ketosis, vegan works as you have almost zero fat intake,
      simply being active, eating healthy and lowering your calorie intake works the best in the long run.

      no matter what a life style change is required. What you do to lose weight you have to live with forever and ever.

      a chef knows nothing compared to a dietician and nutritionist.

      Please get real advice from someone that can explain it in real terms instead of made up mumbo-jumbo like new fat destroys old fat.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I was talking to a chef about a month ago who was complaining about having to put loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo in foods to achieve the taste that the consumer wants, at the expense of their health. "We're paid to kill people," was his complaint, and sadly I think he's right.

      The French eat more oil and fat than Americans, but the French have less than half the heart disease. Why is that? Could it be the fat is not as bad as the stress Americans have? The French get two hours for lunch. Many stores close their doors during the lunch time so they can go to cafe's, sit down with friends, and enjoy life. They also get government to gaurentee 5 weeks of vacation a year no matter what the job. That means the janitor gets 5 paid weeks of vacation, just like his boss.

      And if you will eat fat, how about eating healthy fat? Eat butter instead of margirine. Eat natural olive oil instead of processed oils. The problem is not fat, the problem is companies like McDonalds, to save a few pennies, are using crappy oils that are manufactured and not natural. Plus, we only have 30 minutes to make it from the office, to the fast food joint, and back to the office again. Hope there is enough time to push the sandwich down the throat with one hand while honking the horn to get the asshole in front of us out of the way with the other hand.

      And then, just as lunch is over, I am back at my desk with my heart pumping and head dripping of sweat, just in time to make some sales calls. God, I hope I don't get any more bitch secretaries to screen calls for their bosses.

      What will kill people is all the new manufactured foods, that are filled with chemicals our bodies can't expell. They will fill cells with toxic substances that will cause cancer.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 3, Funny
      I work at a large cooking school where there is some emphasis on nutrition but the curriculum teaches classic cooking--meaning French.

      Rich sauces and meats are essential to learning how to be a chef. In fact, the chef-instructors get pissed off when they get a student who's a vegetarian or health nut who refuses to try sauces and meat.

      I had one French chef come to me one day--he was furious because he had several vegetarians in his class and said "goddammit what the hell are zey doing at a cooking zchool and they don't eat ze fucking meat? How ze hell are zey going to be ze goddamn chef?"

    4. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had one French chef come to me one day--he was furious because he had several vegetarians in his class and said "goddammit what the hell are zey doing at a cooking zchool and they don't eat ze fucking meat? How ze hell are zey going to be ze goddamn chef?"

      Bah, your French chef friend just hates our freedoms. I salute these patriots and I have a feeling that their their democracy-loving Freedom Cuisine will be the newest rage.

    5. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Atkins works as it thows your body into ketosis, vegan works as you have almost zero fat intake, simply being active, eating healthy and lowering your calorie intake works the best in the long run.

      Atkins and vegan diets kill you for the very same reason that unhealty food does: it's unhealty!

      I had many many different diets, and i can tell you that the whole concept of a "diet" is a huge load of crap!

      Do you know what it takes to bekome healty and thin?

      1. Eat only when you're really hungry! not when you just want to eat now. (to force you to a normal eating behaviour. try taping a "H?" above your fridge to remember yourself.)
      2. Eat in smaller amounts and more often (to get your stomach to a normal size again and to not fall into a ravenous appetite).
      3. Move your ass and do some sport.
      4. And most important: never ever stop doing point 1-3 for the rest of your life!

      That's really all you have to do. Nothing more... But as with all addictions, it depents on your willpower to do it. (Tip: A psychologist can help you more than you may think with that problem.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative
      I stay away from oils because they can ruin your whole system...

      Such as acting as transport mechanism for Vitamins A, D and E, which are fat soluble. You have to have some fats and oils in your diet daily, unless you don't care about proper nutrition.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by nido · · Score: 4, Interesting
      And if you will eat fat, how about eating healthy fat? Eat butter instead of margirine. Eat natural olive oil instead of processed oils. The problem is not fat, the problem is companies like McDonalds, to save a few pennies, are using crappy oils that are manufactured and not natural.

      Actually, the primary motivator in McDonald's & other manufactured food providers' switch to partially-hydrogenated polyunsaturated oils (from tallow/lard and coconut/palm oil)was a misguided Holy War by the vegetarian-run Center for Science in the Public Interest, starting in 1984.

      All based on fraud and lies. See the Mary Enig's The Tragic Legacy of CSPI:

      CSPI's well publicized campaign against "saturated" frying fats, especially those used by fast-food restaurants, was launched in 1984 and was continued in 1986 when CSPI added the "tropical oils" to their list of supposed villains in the American diet.

      The whitewash of trans fatty acids began in 1987 with an article by Elaine Blume, published in CSPI's Nutrition Action newsletter. Wrote Blume: "From margarine to Tater Tots, partially hydrogenated vegetable oils play a major role in our food supply. ... In fact, hydrogenated oils don't post a dire threat to health. ... Improving on Nature. ... Manufacturers hydrogenate... these vegetable oils so they won't become rancid while they sit on shelves, or during frying. ... it seems unlikely that hydrogenation contributes much to our burden of heart disease... The fact that hydrogenated oils appear to be relatively benign is cause for thanks, because these fats are everywhere."

      In 1988, CSPI published a booklet called Saturated Fat Attack, which defended trans fatty acids and partially hydrogenated vegetable oils and called for pejorative labeling of "saturated" fats. The booklet contained a section called "Biochemistry 101," which claimed that only tropical oils were dangerous when hydrogenated. "Hydrogenated (or partially hydrogenated) fats are widely used in foods and cause untold consternation among consumers... [they] start out as plain old liquid vegetable oils (usually soybean), which are then reacted with hydrogen... converting much of the polyunsaturated fatty acids to monounsaturated fatty acids... [with]... small amounts... converted to saturated fatty acids... [e.g.], stearic acid, which seems to have no effect on blood cholesterol levels.

      "Overall, hydrogenated fats don't pose a significant risk... exceptions are hydrogenated [tropical oils, which are made]... even worse after hydrogenation."

      Obviously, the individuals writing the booklet were completely ignorant (or pretended to be ignorant) of lipid science. Modern hydrogenation methods create trans fatty acids rather than monounsaturated fatty acids, and very few saturated fatty acids. By 1988, the adverse effects of trans fats were well known. The article points out that stearic acid has no effect on blood cholesterol levels, yet CSPI continued to accuse beef tallow, which is rich in stearic acid, of "raising cholesterol and increasing the risk of heart disease." As for the tropical oils, they do not need to be hydrogenated!

      Blume was at it again in March 1988 with another article, "The Truth About Trans ." "Hydrogenated oils aren't guilty as charged. ... All told, the charges against trans fat just don't stand up. And by extension, hydrogenated oils seem relatively innocent.. ... As for processed foods, you're better off choosing products made with hydrogenated soybean, corn, or cottonseed oil..." This article was widely disseminated; Michael Jacobson provided it as a handout to members of the Maryland Legislature during hearings when the University of Maryland group tried to introduce labeling of trans fatty acids in the State.

      But by 1990, CSPI could no longer defend the indefensible.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    8. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by hoxford · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Have you ever heard of carcinogens? How about Acrylamide? What is Acrylamide? It is just a chemical that food manufacturors put in French Fries and Chips.

      *Put* in French Fries and Chips? Do you have the slightest clue about what you're speaking of? Acrylamide is a chemical contaminant in food caused by a chemical reaction that occurs when foods are fried, deep-fried or oven-baked.

      http://www.nal.usda.gov/fsrio/topics/tpacrylamide. htm

      It's due to the cooking process, not something that's added.

      Speaking of mental slowdowns, do you know where it comes from? Aluminum in the diet. Where does the Aluminum come from? From all the machines that process food.

      Cite, please? Show me an actual study where this correlation is indicated? Hell, show me a study where any significant aluminum is introduced into food through processing.

      Processed foods do cause cancer. Why is it that 30 years ago most Ice Creams were made from milk and sugar, and a flavoring like vanilla beans or chocolate, but today they are made with an ingredient list of 20 chemicals?

      Huh? So ice cream makers are part of a huge conspiracy with the health care/military industrial complex trying to spread cancer to everyone to generate huge profits?

      Why is it that 70 years ago airplanes were made with wood and fabric but today they're made with plastics and composites? Because materials science has advanced and it makes a stronger, longer lasting product.

      The sad part is that I mostly agree with what you're trying (badly) to say. Too many foods have all the nutrition processed out of them for purposes of extending shelflife and allowing the use of cheaper materials. But making crap up and spewing pseudo-science and voodoo doesn't help.

    9. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by mmontour · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is Acrylamide? It is just a chemical that food manufacturors put in French Fries and Chips.

      It's not something that anyone "puts in" fries. It's a substance that forms during the high-temperature cooking process. From your link:

        Acrylamide forms as a result of unknown chemical reactions during high-temperature baking or frying. Raw or even boiled potatoes test negative for the chemical.

      -----

      Think about it, not just foods but all chemicals.[...]

      Here are some chemicals:
        - Adenosine triphosphate
        - Ammonium perfluorooctanoate
        - Cyanocobalamin
        - Oxalocacetic acid
        - Oxalic acid
        - Potassium sorbate
        - Pyruvic acid
        - Xanthophyll
        - Xylene

      Many of these are found in all-natural foods like fresh fruit and vegetables. Some of these chemicals are essential for life, while others are harmful. It is not useful to group them together under an "all chemicals" label and then conclude that they must therefore be bad for you.

    10. Re:loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo by eaolson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you ever heard of carcinogens?

      Of course I have, there's no need to be snippy.

      How about Acrylamide? What is Acrylamide? It is just a chemical that food manufacturors put in French Fries and Chips.

      Actually, that's incorrect. Acrylamide is not added to food by manufacturers. While the exact mechanism of its formation is not fully understood, it seems to form naturally when starchy foods are cooked at high temperatures. McDonald's does not have a 55-gallon drum of acrylamide that they add to the french fries.

      Furthermore, whether or not acrylamide is definetely a carcinogen has not been fully determined. It, however, has been massively over-hyped in the press. And more recent studies have suggested that a diet high in acrylamide-containing foods does not lead to cancer.

      Do you remember sacchrinne? It was used in diet soda, then they discovered it caused cancer.

      Actually, it looks like the studies done back in the 1970s which led to the scare about saccharin weren't well-done. They used ridiculously high doses of saccharin, and the high doses may have caused cancer rather than the substance itself. There has been no link between saccharin and caner in humans. Saccharin hasn't been required to be labeled in the US since 2000.

      There are thousands of more chemicals which will kill a person than a person can eat.

      Of course. There are probably hundreds of carcinogenic substances. There are thousands of toxic substances. But there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions of chemicals. The number of toxins and carcinogens that exist has no relevance to the relative risk from them.

      And of course many of them will kill you if you eat them. They're not food! Salt will probably kill you if you eat an entire bucket of it. So will ethanol or aspirin. Toxins are not carcinogens.

      I don't want to trust a chemist to tell me eating something that he made in test tubes is good for me

      Believe it or not, there is no vast conspiracy of scientists to poision our food supply. We have been performing chemical modification of food since the discovery of fire and the beginning of cooking. The whole point of cooking food is to make the proteins and starches more digestible and so our bodies can absorb its nutrients better.

      I rather eat what my great grandfather ate, and he lived to be 104 and very sharp, no mental slowdown like people get today. Speaking of mental slowdowns, do you know where it comes from? Aluminum in the diet. Where does the Aluminum come from? From all the machines that process food.

      Again, this is not true. I'm not sure what you mean by "mental slowdown" but I'm not aware of any link suggested between aluminum and senile dementia. There was some worry early on about Alzheimer's and aluminum, but it did not hold up under further study.

      Sour Cream. Sour Cream used to be made with bacteria and acidophilus. This is very healthy for people. Do you know how Sour Cream is made today? They take guar gum or starch and thicken milk. It is not even Sour Cream, but they keep calling the thick product that name

      Ingredients: Grade A Cultured Cream. One ingredient. Maybe you should switch brands? I don't know about it being healthy for you, it's rather high in saturated fat.

      Look up Free Radicals. Most foods are filled with them, and they cause people to age and get old and get sick and get cancer.

      Food is not "full" of free radicals. Radicals are so amazingly reactive they aren't stable enough to last very long in food. In fact, preservatives like BHT are added to packaged foods in order to prevent the formation of radicals, which cause the product to break down quickly and have a shorter shelf life.

  2. Spice things up? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean we might actually get some good new spices, once they start playing around with modifying existing ones somewhat gastronomically scientifically?

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  3. 7 years? pfft.... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hah! I can make sandwiches that are edible RIGHT NOW!

    I better put that in my resume... brb.

  4. 7 Year Old Sandwich by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Be careful eating old sandwiches. Homer tried that once and got so sick he couldn't go to Duff Gardens.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:7 Year Old Sandwich by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

      But Fry got parasites that made him a superman...

      Damn cartoon mixed-messages! Be consistent!

  5. Should read: NASA is preparing sandwiches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA is preparing sandwiches which will still be inedible after seven years. And they borrowed this technology from my local high school. They should coat the shuttle with these monstrosities.

  6. Good for seven years by javamann · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good for seven years? Does that mean the developed a twinkie sandwich?

  7. Re:More solutions by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't "solve" the world's food problem. You give humanity more food, you get more humans. And these supplementary humans need more food.

  8. 7 year old sandwiches... by cwest · · Score: 5, Funny

    this is obviously based on failed experiments by the airlines.

  9. Designing food is not cooking by MKalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously.

    I wouldn't call what Kraft & Co are spitting out 'cooking'.

    It is a designer meal replacement that resembles cooked food.

    Maybe I am old fashined, but anything that gets made in huge vats by machines and then packaged in plastic may be something that keeps me alive, but it DEFINETLY is not cooked.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    1. Re:Designing food is not cooking by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just look at Velveeta, for example (a Kraft trademark).

      Velveeta was originally "invented" by a researcher at Rutgers College of Pharmacy. The research was attempting to find a good formula for a skin product that could be used for drug delivery.

      Turns out, what is good for drug delivery is also good for coloring and flavorant delivery. A couple phone calls by an astute professor with a cheese fetish, and Kraft gives us Velveeta.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  10. The real money will be made here by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 3, Funny
    This won't take off until the following products are available:
    • "Viagra" steaks that enchance sexual response
    • "No pain" beer and pizza that lets you drink and eat all night at age 35 without waking up with a hangover and the runs
    • Caffinated bacon
    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  11. Fry ate one of these sandwiches .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Futurama, Fry eats one of these sandwiches ..

    I suppose this is were the nanotechnology comes into play..

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  12. Science gone amuck again by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't want science genetically engineering my food, I don't want them making meals that can be served 7 years later. I don't want the cancer or other diseases that come with it.

    The world has done very well without scientists mucking up our food sources. How many thousands of years have people lived off what the earth grows?

    I now see in my grocery store "organic milk", it is priced twice as expensive as the gallon of regular milk. The same thing is in produce, they have organic vegitables. What is this? 20 years ago everything was organic, now only the rich can get normal food. The rest of us must eat crap that has been genetically modified.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Science gone amuck again by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Abandon the idea that baby food is somehow necessary for adult health (let alone the baby food of another species). That solves the price of milk problem.

      Start growing your own "Heritage" food. See the book "Sailing the Farm" for how this can be done on even a small sailboat, a living space far smaller and disadvantaged than even a metropolitan studio apartment. There are tons of newer books on container gardening.

      If you've got even as little as 16 square feet of dirt, see the book "Square Foot Gardening."

      You might well be surprised at how much you can produce from how little, all without using any of the modern industrial farming techniques.

      It's a matter of scale. The modern industrial approach to farming may be needed to generate the largest profit (not food, profit) from huuuuuuge. . .tracts of land, but have nothing to do with producing enough tomatoes for yourself, by yourself.

      KFG

    2. Re:Science gone amuck again by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't want science genetically engineering my food, I don't want them making meals that can be served 7 years later. I don't want the cancer or other diseases that come with it.

      you don't get cancer from genetically engineered food. to think so betrays a profound lack of education about the slightest bit of what you are talking about

      The world has done very well without scientists mucking up our food sources. How many thousands of years have people lived off what the earth grows?

      actually agriculture is nothing but selecting food crops based on various genetic qualities. we've been genetically engineering foods for tens of thousands of years. there is absolutely nothing natural about an ear of corn or a grain of rice or a shaft of wheat or a potato. they are freakishly huge by natural standards. were these plants released in the wild, they would quicky perish. your "organic" foodstuffs are wholly human creations, and are utterly, in every sense of the word, genetically modified freaks of nature.

      just like dogs. do you love your dog? you're dog is a genetically modified wolf, warped by mankind into something wholly unnatural.

      I now see in my grocery store "organic milk", it is priced twice as expensive as the gallon of regular milk. The same thing is in produce, they have organic vegitables. What is this? 20 years ago everything was organic, now only the rich can get normal food. The rest of us must eat crap that has been genetically modified.

      i assume you live in the west. you are already fabulously rich by world standards. and you are correct: genetically modified foods, that grow in the desert or have vitamin a genes inserted into them, can save thousands of poor people from blindness and starvation.

      but silly me, the hysterical worries of an uneduated propagandized western child is more important than any of that.

      people talk about frankenfoods all the time as a threat to us.

      and i think that is a fitting allegory.

      because if you recall from the story of frankenstein, the hysterical uneducated ignorant peasants were out to burn a creature that only wanted to help them.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  13. The science of cooking by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Roland Piquepaille with Herbed Tomato Sauce

    INGREDIENTS:

    250 pounds Roland Piquepaille
    1 cup article excerpts
    1/8 teaspoon finely chopped original contributions.
    1 primidi.com blog
    1 popular techie website

    PREPARATION:

    Wash Roland Piquepaille; pat dry. Season with 1 cup copy pasted excerpts from article. Mix in 1/8th teaspoon finely chopped original comments. Heat 3 tablespoons oil in a large skillet or Dutch oven and cook until evenly brown. Link to blog and submit to popular techie website.

    Best served hot. Serves ~90,000.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  14. Seven years isn't all that new by danamania · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For example, here is a Pravda article which says that NASA is preparing sandwiches which will still be edible after seven years.

    In around mid 1998, I cleaned my car out and found, among the other rubbish in the back seat, an obviously forgotten McDonalds paper bag, one either me or one of my passengers had bought & forgotten about. It contained a Quarter Pounder and Fries that had been sitting there, dried out for who knows how long. I honestly couldn't remember the last time I'd been to McDonalds when i was doing the cleaning, so I'm guessing it had been there at least six months to a year.

    The fries looked OK. they'd been kept inside the bag & never exposed to the air so no bugs had managed to crawl in. The real surprise was the quarter pounder - I unwrapped it and found a perfectly preserved edible looking and smelling burger. To look at and sniff, it was no different to a brand new fresh one, it was just rock hard and dried out.

    I gave it to my niece who kicked it around for a couple of days in the back yard - it didn't look much worse for wear after that either.

    Judging by the condition of that quarter pounder, I wouldn't be surprised if it would have lasted through to today if I'd kept it in the bag.

  15. Absurd by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was talking to a chef about a month ago who was complaining about having to put loads of oils, creams, butter and mayo in foods to achieve the taste that the consumer wants, at the expense of their health. "We're paid to kill people," was his complaint, and sadly I think he's right.

    What a rediculous statement. It's fine to eat something unhealthy every once in awhile as long as you don't make a habit of it. Eating well 28 days a month will render whatever you do the remaining 2 or 3 days pretty much irrelevant. Avoiding being stabbed 28 days won't help you to much if you are getting stabbed 2 or 3 days a month.

    If your buddy really felt that he was getting paid to kill people, he would quit so obviously he himself realizes his statement is rediculous.

    This same chef was saying how it would be nice if there were alternatives to bad food, that would not jeopardize someone's health.

    There are. They are called vegetables. Again, you eat plenty of vegies and you can get away with eating all sorts of nasty stuff occasionally.

    Your theories on fat murdering other fat are interesting to say the least. You might want to pick up a copy of Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill by Udo Erasmus for a slightly more scientific explanation of how fats operate inside your body.

    When I go out to eat, I don't worry about how healthy the food is and my cholesterol numbers kick holy ass. How do I do it? Because I don't go out to eat very much and when I eat at home I'm very, very healthy. There's no need for genetically engineered superfoods. Just eat right 95% of the time and live a little the reminaing 5%.

    GMD

  16. The Fat Duck by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 3, Informative

    The head chef of the Fat Duck (a British restaurant voted the best in the world this year - jokes about British cuisine now null and void), Heston Blumenthal, is what you might call a 'molecular gastronomist'. By breaking cooking down to the basical levels and using the principles of chemistry to determine good combinations of food one can offer up delights such as bacon 'n' egg ice cream and snail porridge; two of the most famous dishes served at the Fat Duck.

    I read a fascinating article on Blumenthal in The Sunday Times a good few months ago, and also learned of another restaurant (the name and location of which escapes me, although I think it was in Spain) which offered up similar food. The menu for this particular restaurant was something like 17 courses and several hundred euros a head. The writer for the ST (who was lucky to beat a three-odd year waiting list) was amazed at the combinations of ingredients and even the consistencies of the dishes that were comepletely unexpected. One particular serving that stuck in my mind was a kind of 'orange froth' that practically disappeared immediately in your mouth but was full of flavour. The journalist detailed how strange it felt eating froth for dinner. The cover of the supplement I was reading featured pictures from a handful of the courses and the presentation was astonishing. There was a square chocolate lollipop (I forget what wacky ingredient was coupled with it) which was so thin in the middle it was all wispy and translucent and webbed. Delicious.

    Anyone for baconated grapefruit?

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  17. *don't* kick it up a notch! by beacher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    disclaimer- My wife's a chef at a 5-diamond restaurent and she spices her food appropriately and everything rocks. I think that us americans over spice and generally go crazy with trying to add too much flavor. Lighten up a bit on the spice ( here comes the "lips acquire stains" jokes) and try detecting subtle flavors or better combinations.
    I don't know why people insist on nuking foods with cayenne or pouring texas pete on everything.
    -B

  18. You ever *see* a 7-year-old twinkee? by schon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I worked at a convenience store when I was younger - on one of the shelves we discovered a twinkee that was 6 years old. Still wrapped in plastic, the thing was as hard as a rock (literally.)

    We threw it as hard as we could at the arborite countertop. The arborite chipped, but the twinkee was unscathed.

    We hit it with a hammer. Repeatedly. It wouldn't break.

    We debated selling them to the military as a new armor-piercing shell.