Slashdot Mirror


Intel Enters Anti-Virus Market

Jack writes "ITO holds a story on latest Intel investment: "Intel is branching into anti-virus security with a $16 million investment in Czech anti-virus software vendor Grisoft. Grisoft's AVG anti-virus is used on more than 25 million computers worldwide, according to the company."

38 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Worked for Microsoft... Let's see how Intel handle by Nerd+Systems · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Intel buying an anti-virus software could work out well for the company, especially if they share the success that Microsoft had when buying Giant's Anti-Spyware program and taking over it's development. Intel has the ability to take a good product and make it even better, and possibly even implementing hardware-based virus detection into future processors as well.

    If an Intel processor could be made to have hardware-based virus detection, integrating with this software-based virus detection, the team could be a very powerful deterrant to any future virus outbreaks. Imagine the hardware and software components working side by side to protect systems, giving future virus writers another hurdle to be cleared, when developing new virus infestations.

    Hopefully the virus software can be made more efficient as well, so that running virus software on a system won't bog it down, hogging system resources like crazy, making people want to not run virus software in the first place. This has long been the bane of the majority of software packages, as the slowdown they cause for certain users, especially gamers, has made them desire to not run the software packages on their systems, resulting in these systems being more vulnerable to a virus outbreak.

    Another added benefit that I can see from Intel buying this software, is that eventually if they integrate software and hardware aspects into a cohesive package that is well-implemented and able to fight viruses at a better efficiency then other programs, this will cause Intel based processors to stand out as well, as these days, virus protection and spyware protection are very important to the majority of users out there.

    If Intel does this right, this can raise the bar for future processing efforts. Soon there will be more to consider when buying a new system then processing speed and cache size, might have to start considering integrated software as well in the not so distant future...

    Good luck on this one Intel...

    --
    Need a Nerd?
    Nerd Systems
  2. More Free Software Disappearing? by PipOC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this mean that they're no longer going to release AVG updates?

    1. Re:More Free Software Disappearing? by JPM+NICK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its not gone, i Just got it this weekend. It is just hidden on the site. I think ypu need to go to free.grisoft.com

    2. Re:More Free Software Disappearing? by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's always ClamAV, though it doesn't have real-time virus scanning and it's not as easy to use (a Windows install requires Cygwin). Still, it's an open source option.

    3. Re:More Free Software Disappearing? by nolife · · Score: 3, Informative

      Caution with AntiVir. I have not tried it in about two years so things may have changed but the free version will not scan files on network drives, not even real time when they are opened and accessed from a network drive. If you are using AntiVir, you can test this with the Eicar test file stored on a share. This may not be a problem for some but a word of caution if this may apply to you. That is the only reason I switched to AVG from AntiVir for my home use.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  3. Crap. by spauldo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope there remains a free version of AVG. That's what I install on the few windows machines I maintain for people. It's a lot easier to convince people to run antivirus software when they don't have to pay for it.

    --
    Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    1. Re:Crap. by Steamhead · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well there always is Avast antivirus.

    2. Re:Crap. by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative

      And AntiVir

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:Crap. by xaque · · Score: 3, Funny

      And... uh... pirated Norton? > I just wanted to belong...

  4. Intel??? by xiaomonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any clue on why this might be a good strategic move for Intel?

    I mean, it seems a bit random in that it's miles away from their 'core competencies' in chip design/manufacturing.

  5. AVG by wviperw · · Score: 4, Informative

    AVG download page

    I've used the free version of AVG for a few years now and it has been very good to me. I just hope that with this infuse of money Grisoft doesn't become too "corporate."

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
  6. Re:Antivirus CPU by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd say if it was going to go to hardware it would go to the BIOS, which can be updated with new virus definitions. I'm pretty sure you can't update your CPU currently and I haven't heard of any plans to change that in the future.

    Back in the day (maybe now too) some BIOS's watched the boot sector of the computer for viruses that tried to install themselves there.

  7. Re:Antivirus CPU by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems like a big company diversifying and buying a portion of a smaller company, not trying to incorporate antivirus capabilities into their microprocessor line of products.

    And Centrino was just a branding for a specific CPU, WiFi, and chipset. It wasn't some flashy new technology, just flashy marketing. I don't think you can really make virus detection software at the CPU level anyway.

  8. Great Product by JPM+NICK · · Score: 5, Informative

    AVG is great for me because it barely uses any system resources. I run a small company with older hardware and it runs great on there. Much better than something like Norton which can really bog down one of those machines

    1. Re:Great Product by krunk4ever · · Score: 3, Informative

      just wanted to say AVG isn't FREE for everyone.

      from http://free.grisoft.com/doc/2/lng/us/tpl/v5

      Is AVG Free right for you?

      AVG Free Edition is for private, non-commercial, single home computer use only. Use of AVG Free Edition within any organization or for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. The AVG Free Edition is absolutely not for use with any type of OEM bundling with SW, HW component or any service. Your use of AVG Free Edition shall be in accordance with and is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the AVG Free Edition License Agreement which accompanies AVG Free Edition.


      i'm pretty sure a small company computer doesn't constitute as a non-commercial, single home computer.

      just my 2 cents. the software works great, and i recommend it to everyone who wants a good free av software, but their clause does state that any type of commercial use requires the purchase of a license.

    2. Re:Great Product by chill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not bad, you can read! Now point out the part in the post you replied to that said they used the free version...

      Take your time...

        -CH

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Great Product by JPM+NICK · · Score: 4, Informative

      I never said I used a free version. we pay for all our copies, plus having it on our server. I do use the free version at home and recomend it to a lot of people

  9. Re:Antivirus CPU by hungrygrue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, they plan to build chips that automatically shut down when they detect Windows running. Problem solved.

  10. Re:Worked for Microsoft... Let's see how Intel han by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not quite 'buying over the company' as partnering with a local Czech VC to buy over a majority stake from another Czech VC firm.

    From the press release on Grisoft's website:

    Grisoft announces investment by Intel Capital and Enterprise Investors

    Prague, Czech Republic - September 6th, 2005 - Grisoft, one of the leading providers of anti-virus security software, announced today that Enterprise Investors (EI), the largest private equity firm in Central and Eastern Europe, and Intel Capital, Intel Corporation's venture investment fund, have made a substantial investment in the company.

    The $52 million investment in Grisoft by Enterprise Investors and Intel Capital will result in a new ownership structure of the company, with a majority stake being acquired from current owners Benson Oak Capital. As a result of this strategic transaction, the two new investors will own a 65% stake in Grisoft.

  11. Re:Antivirus CPU by GT_Alias · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kind of ties in to the future of anti-virus...AV is moving towards file behavioral analysis to determine a file's viral status since signature detection presents an increasingly serious zero-day problem. Virtualizing a file is a great way to determine behavior, and Intel is working on hardware-assisted virtualization:

    http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/vptech/

    Tie the two ideas together, and you might see one of the ways Intel is hoping to use it's virtualization technology.

  12. Their reputation is being tarnished. by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows is very much associated with Intel (ie. the term "Wintel" systems, for instance). Each time a virus, worm, etc., damages or destroys a massive number of Windows systems, Intel ends up looking very bad. In general, Intel PCs are known to be susceptible to malicious software, even though that is mainly due to the widespread use of Windows, and not directly related to the Intel chips.

    So it greatly benefits them to improve the image of their chips, security-wise. This is something that others should be looking into as well. The PHP developers, while they do not develop hardware, do develop a very similar product. Both an Intel CPU and the PHP interpreter provide an instruction execution environment. As with nearly any such system, abuse is possible. That is why the PHP developers should follow Intel's lead, and create solutions that will help prevent third-party scripts from running amok, and thus tarnishing PHP's reputation.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Their reputation is being tarnished. by commo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I..... don't agree. Viruses are not generally written in machine or machine-specific code, they do the same as most Windows software does: call APIs that have flaws in them because MS does not write them robustly enough nor is there peer review to point out flaws that an originating team optimizing for flawless interoperability with another team's APIs and other code. In essence, open-source development is so sucessful in a security sense because such review (ie: how could a virus exploit this?) has already taken place in the development process in the wild.

      A virus written for a Windows XP machine has at least a 90% chance of hitting a similarly protected Alpha running XP (OK, OK, let the flames begin....). Does the above comment infer that when Mac OS moves to i386 it will be more suceptible? This may be the case, for one or both of two reasons: 1) by then the focus will have moved from MS Windows attacks to Mac OS attacks because of market penetration, plus the added bonus of being a novelty like Windows virii have become. 2) the virus developers have learned tricks for machine calls and stops only pertinent to i386s; see the missing 10%.

  13. I can picture it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Virus Found: AdvancedMediaDestruction.worm

    Threat: 5
    Ease of Removal: 3

    Symptoms: Unit performs well in games and does not get nearly as hot under normal operation.

    Removal Instructions:
    1) Unplug computer and peripherals.
    2) Take off side panel.
    3) Locate large heatsink/fan and remove from chasis.
    4) Remove the underlying chip (Warning: May cause demonic possession if not removed violently enough).

    After which, you must replace the motherboard to fully alleviate all issues.

    Prevention: Use Intel.

  14. Re:Antivirus CPU by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Informative
    > ...built-in virus protection from Intel CPUs...

    Sure. It's called "Trusted Computing". It's another name for "Disney Rights Management". I hope you enjoy getting what you're wishing for.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  15. The Story Is Wrong. by Cocteaustin · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, this isn't Intel entering the anti-virus market. It's Intel Capital (the company's capital investment arm) making an investment in an software company. They're not buying the company, they're just picking up a chunk of it -- it's just like you or me buying stock.

  16. Re:Kudos to Intel. by springbox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's just like making hardware with built in AV software. The idea to me seems absolutely redicilous. Why does the industry need to revolve around fixing Microsoft's problems? Virus scanners are primarily (if not totally) geared towards Windows, right?

    Intel makes a general purpose CPU, and it works just fine. They shouldn't be responsible for fixing their hardware (thinking of the hardware AV idea) because of software that someone wrote to run on it that has undesirable effects to the end user. Similiarly, the PHP developers shouldn't be bothered to fix the (common?) mistakes made by hobbyists or otherwise.

  17. Re:Worked for Microsoft... Let's see how Intel han by krappie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft seems to have a good strong competative pattern that they've been doing. I don't know if Intel can compete. Microsoft's pattern is:

    1. Create an Operating System
    2. Look at what software is successful and making money on that Operating System.
    3. Create Microsoft version of same software
    4. Integrate said software into the OS and use Windows leverage to force OEM's and manufacturers to bundle preinstalled on most computers.

    So far, this has pretty much worked and usually kills whatever piece of software was successful on Windows. I think its about to happen with antivirus software. I dont know if Intel or the other antivirus companies can compete with this. What do you think?

  18. Why? by slashname3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why is Intel getting into the virus writing business? Aren't there enough virus writers out there doing this for free? We don't need the virus writers to be payed for doing this work! Is this some misguided plan to force everyone to run Linux?

    Oh, wait, did it say anti-virus? Never mind. :)

  19. This is the real world, my friend. by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember, this is the real world. Things aren't always fair, and things don't always go as perhaps they ideally should.

    While Intel probably shouldn't be responsible for helping prevent some of the problems associated with Windows, they should very well act so as to protect their image. Limiting the association of malicious software with their processors is a very good start. That is something that they alone must do, however, regardless of what Microsoft does.

    Likewise for the developers of PHP. Sure, they can stand back and always blame the third-party developers who write shitty, insecure scripts. Or they could do the sensible thing, and take some action. Put measures in place to prevent, or at the very least limit, the ability of poorly written third-party scripts to reflect poorly on PHP.

    It's far more beneficial for Intel or the PHP developers to act, rather than just throw blame around while their public images are decimated. Throwing blame around solves nothing, while taking real, technological action may very well prevent the problems in the first place.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  20. AVG Free Edition... by oskard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was a beacon of hope in the freeware = spyware world. Guess we're gonna kiss that one goodbye too :\

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
  21. Re:I wonder.. by Mahou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    more important: will intel still allow avg free to exist?

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  22. Intel and Anti Virus by rodgster · · Score: 3, Informative

    IIRC Intel used to have an AV product namely Intel LanDesk manager. Then they sold it to Symantec which became NAVCE (Norton Anti Virus Corporate Edition) and now SAVCE.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
  23. Re:Antivirus CPU by failure-man · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny, but not without truth. We wouldn't be thinking about extensive antivirus, much less hardware-integrated antivirus if Windows didn't basically have sex with the internet.

  24. Re:Kudos to Intel. by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does the industry need to revolve around fixing Microsoft's problems?

    snip

    They shouldn't be responsible for fixing their hardware (thinking of the hardware AV idea) because of software that someone wrote to run on it that has undesirable effects to the end user.

    Why? Cash!

    You're right, Intel shouldn't be responsible for fixing Microsoft's problems. I'm certain they don't feel that way. Fixing Microsoft's problems, though, is worth millions of dollars. Assuming Intel is looking to build an anti-virus system at the CPU or chipset level (pure conjecture, but let's just assume), they wouldn't be doing it because they feel a responsibility to do so. Rather, they'd be looking for a competitive advantage over AMD, and another reason for customers to ditch their perfectly good (but three year-old) 2.0 Ghz Pentium 4.

    Of course, I'm not even sure how such a hardware anti-virus would work, other than something similar to the NX system on the x86-64 chips. If such a beast does rear its head, though, rest assured that it won't be because someone felt a moral responsibility to fix some Microsoft bugs.

  25. Pro Virus CPU. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  26. Get Clamwin by msaver · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't bother with Cygwin just for AV. Clamwin is pretty sweet. No real-time scanning, but installation and configuration is fairly straight-forward -- and the database is updated several times a day.

    The biggest problem it faces may be that it's so plain and easy to use that people have trouble accepting that it's as good as all the colorful commercial offerings they see. I wonder if Intel's gonna keep AVG's viruses.

    Use it as a second scanner if you already have another AV program-- Clamwin is not a resource hog.

    Oh yeah -- it's frequently used as an email scanner in networks of all sizes... don't worry about it's virus database!

  27. No, not an Antivirus CPU, but a Virtual Machine by rsbroad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is about an Intel Virtual machine, which will wrest the PC away from Microsoft.

    I wish I could remember where I read the article ( Register, Inquirer, or Tom's Hardware ), but
    Intel is crafting a root kit virtual machine which snatches control from Microsoft.

    The first target is a vitual ethernet that performs network security, including antivirus.
    Everything else on the PC is also fair game.

    With this root kit, Intel makes hardware primary again. No more begging silly Microsoft to clean
    up their silly legacy x86 code, which inhibits Intel's plans for massive processor improvements.

    Meanwhile, Bill Gates still blames Intel for the 286, and thinks that Intel are just a bunch of
    lucky incompetents riding on Microsoft's success.

    An Intel root kit will not require Windows software in any way whatsoever. This will free Intel to completely focus on CPU's and chip sets with related drivers. The code can be written in the most optimal manner, favoring the hardware.
    It will also, incidently, provide a silent way to patch Intel bugs, should such ever occur.

    Intel takes over the hardware plus drivers, and makes Windows into just another application.
    All software drivers become Intel Certified instead of Microsoft Certified.
    Apple gets a more fair chance, since the PC is now an Intel desktop.

    Linux gets software driver support for all the latest hardware, as soon as Microsoft does, by
    default.