Intel Enters Anti-Virus Market
Jack writes "ITO holds a story on latest Intel investment: "Intel is branching into anti-virus security with a $16 million investment in Czech anti-virus software vendor Grisoft. Grisoft's AVG anti-virus is used on more than 25 million computers worldwide, according to the company."
Does this mean that they're no longer going to release AVG updates?
AVG is great for me because it barely uses any system resources. I run a small company with older hardware and it runs great on there. Much better than something like Norton which can really bog down one of those machines
Yes, they plan to build chips that automatically shut down when they detect Windows running. Problem solved.
Virus Found: AdvancedMediaDestruction.worm
Threat: 5
Ease of Removal: 3
Symptoms: Unit performs well in games and does not get nearly as hot under normal operation.
Removal Instructions:
1) Unplug computer and peripherals.
2) Take off side panel.
3) Locate large heatsink/fan and remove from chasis.
4) Remove the underlying chip (Warning: May cause demonic possession if not removed violently enough).
After which, you must replace the motherboard to fully alleviate all issues.
Prevention: Use Intel.
And AntiVir
Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
I..... don't agree. Viruses are not generally written in machine or machine-specific code, they do the same as most Windows software does: call APIs that have flaws in them because MS does not write them robustly enough nor is there peer review to point out flaws that an originating team optimizing for flawless interoperability with another team's APIs and other code. In essence, open-source development is so sucessful in a security sense because such review (ie: how could a virus exploit this?) has already taken place in the development process in the wild.
A virus written for a Windows XP machine has at least a 90% chance of hitting a similarly protected Alpha running XP (OK, OK, let the flames begin....). Does the above comment infer that when Mac OS moves to i386 it will be more suceptible? This may be the case, for one or both of two reasons: 1) by then the focus will have moved from MS Windows attacks to Mac OS attacks because of market penetration, plus the added bonus of being a novelty like Windows virii have become. 2) the virus developers have learned tricks for machine calls and stops only pertinent to i386s; see the missing 10%.
more important: will intel still allow avg free to exist?
if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
...te?
BBSpot reported on this ages ago!
p rocessor.html
http://www.bbspot.com/News/2005/05/intel_virus_co