Slashdot Mirror


Sun's Bold New Ad Campaign

Celeritas writes "Sun is making some noise over their latest x64server entries by doing a fly by over Dell's HQ yesterday. A few pictures were snapped to capture the event. Sun has continued the offensive by running some interesting ads as well as designing some that were rejected due to the controversial content or as Sun calls them 'bold ad concepts'"

38 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... for Dell Computer Corporation, anyway.

    McNealy is sure paying a lot of money to keep Michael's name in the big lights.

    1. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      How are these ads for Dell? Look at the
      specs. The Suns cost 50% less,
      and use 66% less power. If anyone did
      any investigation (which is often the case when
      buying servers), then Sun gets the benefit of
      this ad. If, however, buying servers is merely
      about name recognition and "branding" then,
      yes, Dell benefits. But honestly, home
      users do not buy 1U devices. People who
      buy 1U devices look at price, performance,
      and power consumption. So, these adds help
      Sun.

    2. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point that you are missing is that ( and this is a rule of marketing) is that the market leader never mentions the any competitors, but the rest of the companies ALWAYS mention the number one company so that potential consumers will equate their product with the market leader. Think about how often Pepsi mentions Coke in their ads but Coke NEVER mentions Pepsi. This is literally taken my from Marketing 101 class that I took oh so many years ago.

    3. Re:Looks like some great ads by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny

      The 1RU has dual power supplies. I like that. The Dell might as well, but personally I'd buy a Sun over a Dell. But then I'd rather wax my butt crack with an angry wasp than buy a Dell.

    4. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> If anyone did any investigation (which is often the case when buying servers)

      not where I work....

    5. Re:Looks like some great ads by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Marketing 101 class that I took oh so many years ago."

      Quick, get the holy water!

  2. News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell followed up by sending a B-52 on a bomb run over Sun headquarters. Sun was not available for comment.

    1. Re:News at 11 by ramblin+billy · · Score: 4, Funny


      "SUNS GOT AN X64 SERVER...WATCH OUT DELL"

      Hell, I thought they were just gonna toss the thing over the side of the cockpit. With a B-52 they could drop mainframes.

      billy - remember mainframes?

  3. I am a bit disappointed by HairyCanary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the text of that ad, you'd think they had -just- now started selling AMD64 servers. I have several Sun AMD64 servers sitting in my server room, and have for quite a while now. Granted, they're just reference boxes -- but they do say Sun on them.

    1. Re:I am a bit disappointed by saleenS281 · · Score: 5, Informative

      no, they "just now" started selling low cost AMD64 servers. They NEVER sold an entry level complete box for 795$ before the latest release. That's the type of market dell held before. IIRC, the cheapest opteron box previously was almost 2k$. Not only that, these new boxes are "all sun" instead of just a rebadged whitebox from a different manufacturer.

    2. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, just last week, I ran through the neighborhood screaming "I HAVE CABLE TELEVISION!". Nobody seemed to care, though.

  4. Well its official by Momoru · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scott McNealy is officially insane.

    1. Re:Well its official by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny
      Scott McNealy is officially insane.
      Yeah, but unlike a certain Utah CEO, it's funny insane, not dangerous tom himself and others insane.
  5. Reminds me of QuarkExpress by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't Quark run a bunch of ads that maligned Adobe's product and basically made Quark come off like a bunch of insecure jerks?

    When you have to insult your competition, you insinuate that you are losing to them. Sun looks like they are losing to Dell, which they may very well be, I don't know. But this ad campaign cements that idea.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me of when Sony launched the PlayStation. They sent out a guy in a Crash Bandicoot outfit to harrass Sega execs on the golf course, and caught it all on film.

    2. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, let me think about this. A Dell Xeon comodity PC, labeled "server", running Linux, or a real 64-bit server blade running Solaris for roughly the same money. Hmmm, which one goes in my data center? I know! How about the company who knows what a data center is!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by dougmc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, but if I'm interested in high-performance computing, I'd go with the Dell. I wouldn't touch Sun with a barge-pole performance wise; they're strictly for those who need high availability.
      Odd. In my experience, if you need `high performance computing', you've outgrown x86 entirely and so have to ditch Dell and instead get Suns (or IBMs or HPs.) And high availability is thrown in for free ...

      Yes, high end PCs are fast as hell now, and they're competing directly with Suns and IBM's fastest processors, and in the case of raw cpu speed, sometimes they even win. However, PCs have never been able to compete with the I/O bandwidth of the best servers out there, and they still can't.

      (Though I don't know how the new Sun x86_64 boxes do. I suspect they compete nicely with other x86_64 boxes, but that the big Sun machines still beat them, especially in I/O. But when it comes to performance for a given price, it's been hard to beat a good PC for quite some time now, and I don't see this changing any time soon.)

      As for high availability, you can have that with x86, x86_64, Sparc, RS6K, PPC, whatever. The good server boxes have basically caught up with what the servers have had for a long time -- redundant power supplies, RAID, etc. And of course you can't really have a high availability environment with a single computer anyways ...

  6. desperation? by weighn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    the old "bold ad campaign" eh?

    I know jack about marketing, but this stinks of desperation.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  7. Idiots by elronxenu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps Sun could learn to promote their products on their own merits, rather than insulting a competitor.

    1. Re:Idiots by nametaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But then it wouldn't have made digg.com, /., and thousands of other major sites.

      Whats the point of a mature ad campaign that nobody notices. An obnoxious one is almost always better. Just ask AFLAK.

      So that's my take. Can you hear me now?

    2. Re:Idiots by minion · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Perhaps Sun could learn to promote their products on their own merits, rather than insulting a competitor.
       
      I think those ads speak very well of Sun's merits.
      A) Sun's servers use less power
      B)Sun's servers put off less heat
      C)Sun's servers are faster than Dell's.
       
      Really, one thing to consider here: Sun makes an OS, makes CPUs, makes chipsets.. And we're not talking just the fabrication. They have engineers designing this stuff... What has Dell ever developed? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. They've developed nothing, except for a business model that takes other people's desgins and hard work, and mass produces them so each unit can make a $5 profit, and hope that they'll sell a million units.
       
      They are the leech of the industry, and with our patronage, future R&D is in grave trouble, because they give nothing back to the community.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    3. Re:Idiots by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whats the point of a mature ad campaign that nobody notices. An obnoxious one is almost always better.

      That would be a valid point if you were selling soft drinks to teenagers. Then, plublicity is everything. Instead, you are selling servers to people who spend a lot of money on computers. People like that are generally not particularly impressed by childish, insecure ads. While you are allowed to have brash, bold, ad campaings, the general rule in corporate "stuff" advertising is NEVER ADVERTISE YOUR COMPETITION. If you do, the target of the campaign might get the idea that you are tyring a Jedi Mind Trick on him, and figure out that maybe he/she should take a closer look at the company your ad is telling him to ignore.

      Ads that extol how great your stuff is are taken far more seriously than ads that say how much your competition sucks.

      You can come up with a witty, fun way to do this (IBM's ads come to mind), without resorting to childish insults. (Sun Example: "Their servers run on twice the power and are slow [or something like that]. No wonder their name rhymes with HELL.")

      Gimme a break... this is schoolyard recess crap. Most of us outgrew this in fourth grade.

      SirWired

  8. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But don't most server admins know the benefits, and won't they have already done the research on what they want to buy?

    You think server admins usually get to choose what to buy?

    I don't think so.

    It looks to me the ads are probably targeted at getting the mindshare of PHB types.

  9. Link to the Quark ads by ReformedExCon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  10. Re:Unfortunately... by bajan_on_ice · · Score: 5, Informative

    Err, have you NOT been reading slashdot for the last couple of days? This is what these ads are all about. AMD Opteron boxes for cheaper than Dell sells em and faster as well. New designs by Andy Bechtolsteim (sic), who is widely regarded as one of the best server designers...

    Oh, and I think these boxes are supported by Sun for Windows, Linux (Redhat and Suse) and of course Solaris.

    And of course they push Solaris. Some people actually think that it MIGHT be a better Unix that Linux (Moderators, you didnt read that...)

    --
    "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
  11. wow by Tsiangkun · · Score: 5, Funny

    20 comments, and the images are still available. I guess the new servers are ass-kickin machines.

  12. Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 5, Informative

    What price sheet have you been looking at and from what year?

    A Sun Fire X2100 starts at $745 LIST. Go through a reseller and you're guaranteed to get discounts on top of that. These prices that UNHEARD OF for Sun. They have completely slashed their prices down to levels that I never thought I would ever see. I've been working with Sun hardware for 10 years and I've been cursing their outrageous prices for nine of those years as I saw Intel after Intel replace numerous Sun workstations and servers. I've had no excuse to curse Sun's prices in the past 12 months.

    If we were talking about the Sun of the past, you'd be absolutely correct. They charged outrageous prices because your were buying the Sun name and the Sun R&D. That arrogance died very recently. Look at any of their x86 offerings, like the Ultra 20, which is also available for less than $900 list.

    Half the quality? They offer a 3 year warranty on all hardware. Every other vendor I've had to deal with wants a service contract ($$$) for that amount of coverage. I doubt they'd give that warranty if they thought the quality was such that the systems wouldn't last at least that long. Otherwise, they'd expect to lose a shitload of money to spare parts and customer service calls, which would not be a wise move at all.

    Oh, by the way ... all of Sun's x86 servers are certified to run Linux. They wouldn't bother if they thought that Linux sucks.

    It's blatantly obvious that you don't have a clue what you're talking about or you just want to bash on Sun for the sake of bashing on Sun.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  13. Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to by mtrisk · · Score: 5, Funny

    That porno-mag style interview with the SunFire server near the fire place is very interesting - more proof that porn and technology go hand in hand. What kind of website would reliable, beefy server hardware be more suited to than a pr0n operation?

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 4, Funny
      more proof that porn and technology go hand in hand.

      Well, not necessarily hand in hand.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  14. I have a few ideas... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell, the name Osama Bin Laden swears by.

    When you buy Dell, it makes the baby Jesus cry. You don't want to make the baby Jesus cry, do you?

    Hey Dell, we just fucked your girlfriend.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  15. Re:Inflammatory by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative
    On a side note, it's quite interesting to see SUN, who used to be *the* big player do anything to grab some press.

    You act like this is new for Sun. Let's not forget that this is the same Sun that sent a boatload of exterminator trucks to the Windows 2000 launch just to remind everyone that Win2K had 65,000 bugs in it. Or the constant bickering between Sun and IBM.
    IBM: We're going to *Eclipse* the competition.
    Sun: Let's *shine some light* on IBM's claims.

    Not to mention McNealy's comments about HP: "They make great printers!"

    Nope, nothing new under the Sun.
  16. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why? I think that's a really brilliant move! That means that Sun systems are the only systems out there that are certified to run Linux, Windows, and Solaris x86. That's has the potential to be an awesome marketing tool that no other server manufacturer can make.

    As I mentioned in a different Slashdot story, one of the local Windows admins got a loaner Sun system with Windows installed on it and he was very impressed with its speed and stability. That can open a whole, new market base for Sun. And even if those servers don't run Solaris now, who's to say that they won't in the future as current systems are put into end-of-life or replaced and therefore can serve other functions? Now that we've moved the data to a bigger server, what should we do with this one? Let's put that Solaris on it and see what we can do with it. Hey, it's a very distinct possibility.

    Personally, I think that it's about time that McNealy swallowed a bit of that arrogant pride of his. It's been a long time coming. As a Sun admin for over 10 years I'm very excited about this new direction that Sun has been taking. Let's hope it's not too little, too late.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  17. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by Lehk228 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the ad doesn't suck... we are all sitting around slashdot talking about servers almost none of us were previously interested in but here we are talking about them, and looking up system specs on them. This ad will work quite well to stir up a buzz about Sun's servers.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  18. Re:photoshopped by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope. I live right next to Dell's Round Rock campus and this (http://www.justanotherpodcast.net/Files/Sunx86Fly oversmall.jpg) is exactly what was flying over around 2 PM.

  19. x64 by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 5, Informative
    x64 is Microsoft's vendor neutral name for x86-64/AMD64/IA32e/EM64T. Linux calls it x86-64, but since AMD officially deprecated that name, Sun goes by the Microsoft convention and says x64.

    Sun would probably say AMD64, since that is what they sell, except that they also want you to run Solaris on your non-Sun boxes, which may have 64 bit Intel x86 processors. They may also want to avoid burning bridges, in case Intel processors become more compelling in the future.

    --

    Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
    whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
    --Proverbs 9:7
  20. The facts are simple by cpu_fusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sun has a winning hand here. It is that simple.

    The AMD64 platform is a better platform than Intel's at the moment, in every way. And on top of that, Sun has a hell of a lot more experience in building bulletproof hardware. When you factor in Solaris & a lower price tag ... you can see why Sun has no problem mentioning Dell in the ads.

    You can spin this whatever way you want, but I'm looking forward to seeing Sun trash the company that brought us the "Dell dude". Dell can go back to selling their overpriced PCs at Christmas, and the people who actually run the important servers in the world, doing billion dollar transactions, have a clear path to keep the Windows/Dell bozos out of the server room in the basement of the bank.

  21. With apologies to Nappy D by bighoov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Michael Dell: I'm trying to make computers for kids to take to college.

    Scott McNealy: Your mom goes to college.

  22. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by LizardKing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    my theory is: ... Good products don't need much if any advertising.

    That was the attitude over at Digital. Their head honcho believed that they would dominate by just having the best products, and that marketing was therefore a waste of time. Instead they got bought out by some commodity PC outfit called Compaq.