Slashdot Mirror


Hilton Hacker Gets 11 Months

B747SP writes "Well, the guy who 'acquired' the contents of Paris Hilton's Sidekick telephone and published them on the Internet has had his day in court. T-Mobile USA and the State of Massachusetts are pleased to report that he has been sentenced to 11 months in a juvenile facility. He's also not allowed to own or use a computer, a cellphone, or any other device that can access the Internet for two years. It turns out that the Hilton hack was just one of many Bad Things(tm) that he had been up to: calling in bomb threats to schools, creating T-Mobile accounts for himself and his friends, breaking in to data broker LexisNexis' systems are just a few of his exploits."

70 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Last post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    See you guys in 2 years!

  2. I hear he's expecting to get rooted by Inthewire · · Score: 2, Funny

    N/T

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
    1. Re:I hear he's expecting to get rooted by Cerdic · · Score: 2, Funny

      But he's not allowed to use a computer! What kind of possible rooting could he experience in prison? It's not like he has a computer in his cell or in the shower room or anything.

      --
      Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
  3. What about her crimes???? by NerdBuster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Paris should get 11 years for her acting ability and general ability to annoy people.

    1. Re:What about her crimes???? by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I watched a documentary about the celebrity publicity machine the other day. They mentioned Paris Hilton. Apparently, the public images of herself (as a party girl with loose morals and limited brains) and that of her sister (quiet and reserved) are carefully crafted creations of a PR firm. Real-life Paris is supposed to be very street smart, with an ability to add up figures with the speed and accuracy of a computer.

      Why does she want to have such a seemingly "negative" public image? Well, without that, she would be just another anonymous rich kid. Now she is a world-famous "brand", with a name recognition that rivals that of the late Princess Di (at least among women). And surprisingly, most of her "target audience" admires her for having the will and ability to get what she wants when she wants it.

      Magnus.

    2. Re:What about her crimes???? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They mentioned Paris Hilton. Apparently, the public images of herself (as a party girl with loose morals and limited brains) and that of her sister (quiet and reserved) are carefully crafted creations of a PR firm. Real-life Paris is supposed to be very street smart, with an ability to add up figures with the speed and accuracy of a computer.

      You mean she has all the skills necessary to deal dope or run a numbers racket?

      Actually her brand management is pretty slick, she has got to the position where she can charge $100K just to attend a party for a couple of hours. Much more of that image was created by Paris than you might imagine.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:What about her crimes???? by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I were given the choice of being set for life, or being still more ridiculously rich at the expense of my dignity, I'd definitely choose the former.

      --
      Photos.
  4. Hmm by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if the job offers have already started, or if the security companies are waiting until this particular piece of human trash gets out of jail.

    1. Re:Hmm by fsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is one idea that I really don't understand. Why would the security firms want to hire someone who has hacked into computers? Homicide detectives don't hire murderers, the SEC doesn't hire fraudsters, the ATF doesn't hire drunk smokers w/ unregistered firearm violations....

      I wouldn't hire this kid simply because he would open me up to lawsuits from my stockholders.

      --
      fsh
    2. Re:Hmm by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is one idea that I really don't understand. Why would the security firms want to hire someone who has hacked into computers? Homicide detectives don't hire murderers, the SEC doesn't hire fraudsters, the ATF doesn't hire drunk smokers w/ unregistered firearm violations....

      When computer security was in its infancy, the person who broke into your system was the most qualified to stop other people. For a bunch of years, people who pulled off significant hacks (Mitnick) would get recruited. Basically, it takes a crook to catch a crook.

      The guy who the movie "Catch Me If You Can" was based on ended up in the employ of the FBI detecting counterfeit stuff because he was so damned good at it.

      Then people started arresting those who did such things. It's far less common for these people to get security jobs after their jail-time.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Hmm by learn+fast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me extend this by saying that we should not hire lobbyists to be regulators.

    4. Re:Hmm by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      the SEC doesn't hire fraudsters

      Actually they do. The famous example was Joe Kennedy who headed the SEC when it was first created. Roosevelt said it "took a thief to catch a thief." He basically outlawed every dirty trick he used to become rich himself.

    5. Re:Hmm by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering that the kid in question thought a bomb threat was a good way to start a school day, he'll probably be working fries for at least a few years before they trust him with network security. The guy's no hacker, he's just a juvenile thug who happens to be computer literate.

    6. Re:Hmm by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 3, Funny

      the ATF doesn't hire drunk smokers w/ unregistered firearm violations

      Huh, no wonder they don't return my calls. Oh well, I guess I can always fall back on AOL tech support...

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    7. Re:Hmm by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or laywers as lawmakers.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Hmm by fsh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I understand that it can happen every once in a while, but the whole reason they could make a movie out of the counterfeiter was because it was so unusual.

      The problem with hiring a criminal for law enforcement is simply that the techniques the criminal would be most comfortable with are against the law. Sure, he might be able to track down more criminals than the trained enforcement personel, but he also wouldn't be able to back it up in court, and wouldn't be able to get the convictions.

      Certainly, law enforcement will interview known felons in order to help break a case, but the felons are rarely put in a position of trust, where they will be required to testify, simply because it's way too easy for the defense to pick them apart.

      --
      fsh
    9. Re:Hmm by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 3, Informative

      The police could have the felon illegally get evidence that lets them know what the need to investigate, then all the need to do is find the right pretext to get at the data, like perhaps going into a business that the illegal investigation turned up some dirt on, buy something, and check the money you get back as change for drug residues (nearly 100% likely to be positive) and use that as a pretext for a drug investigation, and then "legally" find what you already illegally know and use the "legally" found info in court.

      Or just watch those the illegal info points you to like a hawk so closely that you catch them in the act. Tail them and when they do a 36 in a 35, pull them over, say they look nervous, and search the car for example or have it sniffed for drugs possibly (have a K9 unit pull them over - have the dog and the cop go up to the suspects, etc).

      Yes, the above isn't ethical, but it is possible.

      And law enforcement does "hire" felons, just not on the payroll.

      They are called "paid informants", or "rats".

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    10. Re:Hmm by Zordak · · Score: 4, Informative
      The guy who the movie "Catch Me If You Can" was based on ended up in the employ of the FBI detecting counterfeit stuff because he was so damned good at it. Then people started arresting those who did such things. It's far less common for these people to get security jobs after their jail-time.
      Frank Abagnale, Jr. spent six months in a French prison where he could not stand erect and where he slept in his own excrement. He was borderline insane when he was finally released to the custody of (IIRC) the Netherlands, where he spent about a year in a much nicer prison. He was slated to be turned over to (again, IIRC) Spain, where he would have spent time in another miserable and inhumane prison, but his Dutch captors took pity on him and found a way to invalidate his passport. That meant they had to "deport" him to the United States, where he promptly escaped by crawling out of the toilet when his plane landed. He was re-captured and spent some time in a US prison. He still managed to start his own security consulting business and make millions of dollars. The difference was not the jail time. The difference was that he was truly brilliant and he apparently did not have a truly criminal disposition. He was basically a horny teenager (much of his crime was committed in pursuit of women). When he got some maturity, he was able to put his skills to a beneficial use. He also eventually paid back all of the money he stole.

      In contrast, I'm betting this little hacker twerp is some wannabe who got ahold of a computer and read a couple of "howto" sites. He may or may not have the disposition of a hardened criminal, but until he does something original, nobody will notice him. Maybe if he's lucky, he'll get a wikipedia entry.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    11. Re:Hmm by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not just the antisocial behavior. In order to be an attractive hire for one of these agencies or companies, you have to be something of a virtuoso. The people you hear about who dodge jailtime by getting hired by the people who caught them were offered those jobs because they were innovative in their lawbreaking, and had demonstrated that they had the critical thinking skills that distinguish successful criminals and good troubleshooters.

    12. Re:Hmm by gid13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, the point is not that the criminal will use illegal techniques to gather evidence.

      The point is that the criminal will be more comfortable with the illegal techniques others use, and be able to explain those techniques, expose whatever weaknesses to legal evidence-gathering they may have, and harden security against them.

      I'm not saying it always makes sense to hire a criminal for a security job, but I can certainly see the advantages.

    13. Re:Hmm by sd_diamond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He [Abagnale] was basically a horny teenager (much of his crime was committed in pursuit of women).

      Whereas the person in question here was a horny teenager with exceptionally bad taste in women.

  5. Nice kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All that and he only got 11 months? While there's a guy in California doing life for stealing a candy bar?

    Also, the blurb failed to mention that this nice young fellow wasn't acting alone (see the Register's coverage from this morning)

    1. Re:Nice kid by terrahertz · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're talking about Glen A. Reed, here's the real scoop, from http://www.newsoftheweird.com/archive/index.html:

      "Said Glenn A. Reed, 31, upon being sentenced in Waco, Texas, in July to 99 years in prison as a habitual criminal (after rejecting a plea bargain that would have meant a 15-year sentence): "There's things I choose to do, like, if I go in a store and choose to take a Snickers bar, if you catch me, you catch me. If not, I'm going to go home and eat it up and go on about my business, dog."

      --
      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    2. Re:Nice kid by RWerp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He's probably insane and should have medical treatment. Putting him in the prison sounds pretty stupid to me.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  6. Radisson? by alexhohio · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can he stay at a hilton?

    --
    Almost every Harvard student was High School Valedictorian- After a year of college, half are in the bottom of the class
  7. Less about Hilton by CMF+Risk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More to do with all those bomb-threats me thinks =)

  8. Is it just me? by Mz6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or did I completely miss the story about the kid getting busted for this?

    --
    Hmmm.
  9. Cue the apologists by 14erCleaner · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm sure we'll now hear that this poor kid's untapped potential for technical greatness is being stifled. Cry me a river. The kid sounds like a felon-in-training to me.

    Maybe during his probation period he should be required to listen to Paris Hilton's commentaries on current events, nonstop.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Cue the apologists by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe during his probation period he should be required to listen to Paris Hilton's commentaries on current events, nonstop.

      Amendment VIII

      Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  10. Maybe t-mobile will learn. by crazygeek02 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe T-mobile will get their act together now and fix all the problems. Who knows.

    1. Re:Maybe t-mobile will learn. by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe T-mobile will get their act together now and fix all the problems

      I wish they would. I have several problems for them to solve.

      First, I have a stomach ache. Once they solve that, then I need them to solve the energy crisis. And I have an application my intern wrote that has a lot of bugs in it they could fix.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:Maybe t-mobile will learn. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe T-mobile will get their act together now and fix all the problems.

      Why would they do that? The guy responsible was caught and is now going to jail... The system is now secure!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  11. DOS? by cached · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    In June, a second phone company became a victim to the juvenile's attack, according to the U.S. Attorney's statement. A phone that had been activated fraudulently was disabled, and the teen retaliated with a denial-of-service attack on the company's Web site when it refused to reactivate the phone.

    Im not trying to troll, but what kind of professional website gets harmed by a DOS attack anymore. Slashdot alone should make webmasters think twice before putting up a service with a server that cant handle DOS attacks. :)

    --
    +1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
    1. Re:DOS? by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Informative

      With a DOS or the more popular Distributed version, it's just a matter of sheer strength.

      The amount of bandwidth these kids can harness to sling around is amazing, have you been on IRC (preferably EFnet) much? Now, with non-inept systems admins, and network guys... DoS attacks can be thwarted somewhat

      But, again, it's sheer power. Some kid has a bunch of obscure boxes rooted all sitting on fat pipes... it can be bad

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  12. Many mistakes in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The numbers included those of rapper Eminem, actor Vin Diesel, singers Christina Aguilera and Ashlee Simpson, and tennis players Andy Roddick and Anna Kournikova.

    I count at least 4 mistakes in this one sentence alone!

  13. Script Kiddies..... by OxygenPenguin · · Score: 3, Funny

    We present your leader. All bow to the alpha kiddie.

    --
    Read the only personal Runyon page out there.
  14. YRO? by general_re · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't for the life of me figure out why stuff like this keeps getting stuck in the YRO section. As far as I can tell, the only person whose rights were in any danger was Paris Hilton - granted, her privacy is largely a theoretical concept these days, but nevertheless, what possible bearing does this kind of thing have on my rights online?

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    1. Re:YRO? by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny
      As far as I can tell, the only person whose rights were in any danger was Paris Hilton...

      No, it's Paris Hilton *and* everyone in her address book! That may not include dweebs like you, but the average Slashbot certainly has to be concerned about having his personal information get in the hands of the paparazzi.

    2. Re:YRO? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe because, in America, we have this sentimental nutty idea that "the punishment should fit the crime" and imprisoning anyone (much less a kid) for a year or more for cracking someone's cellphone while violent criminals get away with little or no penalty is hard to justify.

    3. Re:YRO? by general_re · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's true - those bastards at the Enquirer never come around any more, since I stopped having drug-fueled weekend-long threesomes with Jennifer Aniston and Gwyneth Paltrow. sniff

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  15. How Hilton Was Hacked by airherbe · · Score: 5, Informative


    An explanation of how Paris Hilton's Sidekick was hacked can be found here. A pretty interesting read.

    //J

  16. Re:2 Years by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a deterrent in that if he gets caught, he's in violation of the court order which could get his ass thrown back in jail.

  17. 'Social engineering' is not hacking! by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    its being a good con artist! So what, this guy was able to sound like paris hilton, and she picked a stupid 'password reminder' that he used to get the real info from a phone jockey at T-mobile. Calling this kid a hacker is JUST WRONG.

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    1. Re:'Social engineering' is not hacking! by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What are you talking about? Social engineering is the greatest tool in a hackers leatherman. What this kid did was not a difficult, and he probably doesn't deserve the term "hacker." However, what he did is certainly a valid hack.

  18. Gotcha... by BrianRaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He hacked illegally, and now he's paying the price. I say he got what he deserved. Too bad the kid's a juvie. I'd like to have seen him go to a real prison.

    --
    As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
  19. Re:To coin a phrase... by Fox_1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    He most certainly was not Mitnicked, that would require 4 years of imprisonment without a trial. It would require overzealous prosecution by the state and the media. This kid got a speedy trial, not imprisonment without a trial, and a relatively light sentence considering the scope of his crimes.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
  20. Congratulations, son. by ChrisF79 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congratulations! You just earned yourself a high paying security job with the United States government. We are all very impressed with your unusual interview. See you in two years.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
  21. "Hacker"? by HugePedlar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some kid guessed her password reminder and we're calling him a hacker? Even "cracker" would be too good for this feat of leetness.

    Not sure I'd even deign to call him a script-kiddie.

    --
    Argh.
    1. Re:"Hacker"? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guessed? He used her password hint which was "Favorite Pet's Name" and three seconds of google tells you Paris Hilton's dog's name.

      Not a guess, she put her password out there for everyone to know.

      So, the lesson here is that if you're a famous bimbo and your pet's name is on the internet.. don't use it as a password to hide your naked pictures.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  22. Re:Honestly by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 5, Funny
    I admire him. Anything bad that happens to that filthy whore the better. I'm not one to encourage the moral degredation of society.

    Oh man. You condemn hedonism as immoral and then condone another sort of bad behavior, all in the same breath. Way to go, Socrates.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  23. "Hacking" by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hacking Paris Hilton's box would seem to be its own punishment. One is sure to contract a virus.

    -Peter

  24. Reasonable Sentence by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think 11 months is a reasonable sentence for the first offense of someone who committed a serious crime, but not a violent one.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  25. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amen.

    I personally have a problem with both the "hacker" and Paris. The guy did something illegal, and now he's going to jail for it. Good.
    Paris, who may enjoy sex and is perfectly normal, really does use it for attention. It seems to be her only saving grace, and I bet she wouldn't be on TV otherwise. People who parade their sexual conduct in public for everyone to see are just degrading themselves.

  26. Why am I surprised... by Leomania · · Score: 2, Interesting

    breaking in to data broker LexisNexis' systems

    Now, I realize that no interconnected computer system can be 100% secure, but shouldn't a place like LexisNexis be able to keep kids like this out? Was he really that good, or are they just really lousy at computer security?

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
  27. damn haxors by kronchev · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Computer hacking is not fun and games. Hackers cause real harm to real victims," U.S Attorney Michael Sullivan said in the statement. "Would-be hackers...should be put on notice that such criminal activity will not be tolerated." ....or not. i mean i know the companies are blameless for having a really obvious security hole up, but these kids should be put to death if they are the ones to find it and just mess around, instead of someone doing it and causing REAL harm

  28. Re:To coin a phrase... by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right, but you also forgot to mention that Paris Hilton isn't nearly as vain as Tsutomu "Takedown" Shimomura.

  29. Let's talk about secret questions by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Enough on this kid (who commited a crime and got what was deserved), let's talk about those annoying 'secret questions'. I've lost count of the number web sites that require you to answer one of these and don't even let you choose a decent question. Not just insignificant sites, like random forums, but important sites that pretain to things that matter in real life, like my college records or credit card information.

    I'm not a celebrity like Paris Hilton, but it is not hard at all to find out what my mom's maiden name is, or the names of my pets, or where I went to high school. At least give me the option to choose my own question, or better yet, not use the question at all.

    1. Re:Let's talk about secret questions by thing12 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've lost count of the number web sites that require you to answer one of these and don't even let you choose a decent question.

      You mean you actually use a contextually appropriate answer to the "secret" question? You're better off using an answer to a different question, i.e. your mother's maiden name as the response to where you went to high school. It's still top of mind information, and at least then your enemies (and friends) can't break into your account quite so quickly.

  30. Hilton hacked....isn't there a video of this? by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    At this point, who hasn't "hacked" Paris Hilton? Oh, wait, I see, this is about her phone. Well at least with the phone you can put a lock in it to prevent its use; can't really say the same for her.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  31. Why bother? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

    His life is so devoid of meaning that he hacked the handheld of some rich strumpet that everybody now knows isn't even a good lay. Isn't that punishment enough?

  32. Beat up the little guy... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, what I want to know is, what punitive measures were taken against T-mobile for having such poor security processes that a teenager could pull this off for so long without being stopped?

    It is easy to send one kid, who probably couldn't afford more than a public defender, to jail. But what does it do to fix the problem? There are thousands more kids who could do the same thing, there are probably tens of professionals who are doing it right now and are smart enough to say under the radar.

    Other than the fact that T-mobile has the big gun lawyers, big gun lobbyists and big gun 'campaign contributions' - why haven't they been prosecuted for negligence?

  33. Why Jail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great. He's being sent to jail.
    How is that supposed to set him straight?
    Did he do it because he hadn't spent enough time incarcerated?

    Really, does jailing non-violent criminals like this kid help anything?
    It costs taxpayers money, and him time.
    If he were fined, put under supervision, and required to do serious charity work, it'd do everybody a little better.

    Seriously, let's reserve jail for those who need to separated from the rest of society for everyone's good.
    I really don't see a kid who hacked a cellphone
    falling into that category.

  34. Too bad by MacDork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad nobody makes that response to the +5 funny prison rape comments.

  35. Re:To coin a phrase... by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And of course Mitnick waiving his right to a speedy trial and his defense team requesting delays during the trial had NOTHING to do with why it took so long, right?

  36. Re:Pathetic by Bent+Mind · · Score: 2, Funny

    A person who uses sex to get attention also isn't happy.

    Unless the attention they want is sexual. After all, my Wife uses sex to get my attention from time to time, and she seems quite happy when I'm done.

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  37. Re:To coin a phrase... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Informative
    He most certainly was not Mitnicked, that would require 4 years of imprisonment without a trial.

    Sure Mitnick got a trial, when he was arrested he was already a parole violator, so he went straight back to jail to complete his sentence. He could have got a quicker trial but his attorney was negotiating a plea bargain - he eventually pled guilty.

    Mitnick was adept at social engineering, he appears to have socialy engineered you into thinking that he was somehow hard done by. He got the five year sentence for his sxith conviction, not his first (three of his convictions were as a juvenile).

    If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  38. First Hand Experience by 1nt3lx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have first hand experience with this particular individual. I wanted to reply to every post I've read on this page and address each point individually. However, there are too many points to address and too many of my own to add.

    My Experiences
    My first experience with this kid was three years ago. I am a consultant for the school department in which he was attending high school.

    One afternoon I got wind of a report that a couple of computers were "operating themselves." Of course, they were not, they were being controlled by VNC. We took the computers out of the library, found the backdoor, and analyzed all the files. We were also able to identify the backdoor that was installed, as well as the many utilities that were downloaded from a file-serving website he had setup.

    Many of the files contained portions or the entirety of a first name. The website the files were downloaded from contained the same first name.

    The backdoor was installed on the premesis. It was installed before the start of school. The utilities were downloaded during school hours.

    We did a first name search in the SIS system, we found five or so individuals with the same first name. None were enrolled in a class that had a computer in the classroom. We then did an attendence search on those individuals. Only one was absent the date the utilities were downloaded. We had our guy, we were confident, but the evidence was circumstantial.

    We decided to put the compromised (Windows 98) systems back on the network under surveillance, or specifically tethereal. The systems immediately connected to irc.mircx.com and joined a channel with the first name, again.

    For a few days nothing happened. No activity, other than the PING/PONG of IRC. That weekend, however, he bit. He bit hard, too. He searched the names and phone numbers of guidance counsellors, secretaries, and other school personnelle. He obviously conducted some rather trivial social engineering. He was able to gain access to the SIS system, which runs on OpenVMS.

    We tracked his every move, I laughed and laughed as he struggled with VMS. Time after time he would break the telnet connection because he was stuck in EDT, or because he confounded the DEC Basic application. He queried himself multiple times, tried to change information about his enemies, I assumed, and made unsuccessful attempts to change his own grades.

    The administration didn't buy it. He cried foul, denied any knowledge of computers, claimed he was botted, claimed hackers were out to get him. They didn't pursue the issue, but we 'secured' the network. We dropped all IRC traffic and all VNC traffic. The next day we were subjected to a crippling DDOS, and a bomb threat was called into the school. We couldn't prove it was related and got no support from above.

    A few months later, he was cought red handed trying to break into an attendance-entry web interface, by a librarian. He was suspended and removed from computer classes. Case closed, at least from our perspective. A few more days of DDOSes, but that ended quickly.

    The next school year, bizarre things started happening again. The High School's network was secured, but the middle schools were not locked down as well. Again, the SIS system was being accessed after hours from backdoored systems. Again, social engineering had taken place. We locked down that building, but the accesses were still happening. It was determined that an unsecured WAP had been installed on site and he was sitting outside the building accessing the network. (Sometimes I wonder why they pay me when they do things like that despite my objections).

    Of course, we had even less evidence this time to point to him but it was obviously him. The IRC backdoors were the same, the names were the same, the passwords were the same, but the administration still refused to act. We secured that network and the after hours accesses stopped, but unusual activities continued to arouse suspicions.

    U

  39. The morning news... by JThundley · · Score: 2

    I saw this on the Fox 11 morning news, and there were 3 things to note:

    1. One woman said "He was hacking into the internet..."

    2. One 50 year old anchor guy said "This is not a cool dude", even more rofles.

    3. Their file footage of Paris Hilton was of her in a float of a car in a parade waving to people. Why the fuck was she in a parade and why were people happy to see her?!

  40. RAEP IS FUNNY GUY by Vicsun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been sentenced for a D.U.I. offense. My 3rd one. When I first came to prison, I had no idea what to expect. Certainly none of this. I'm a tall white male, who unfortunately has a small amount of feminine characteristics. And very shy. These characteristics have got me raped so many times I have no more feelings physically. I have been raped by up to 5 black men and two white men at a time. I've had knifes at my head and throat. I had fought and been beat so hard that I didn't ever think I'd see straight again. One time when I refused to enter a cell, I was brutally attacked by staff and taken to segragation though I had only wanted to prevent the same and worse by not locking up with my cell mate. There is no supervision after lockdown. I was given a conduct report. I explained to the hearing officer what the issue was. He told me that off the record, He suggests I find a man I would/could willingly have sex with to prevent these things from happening. I've requested protective custody only to be denied. It is not available here. He also said there was no where to run to, and it would be best for me to accept things . . . . I probably have AIDS now. I have great difficulty raising food to my mouth from shaking after nightmares or thinking to hard on all this . . . . I've laid down without physical fight to be sodomized. To prevent so much damage in struggles, ripping and tearing. Though in not fighting, it caused my heart and spirit to be raped as well. Something I don't know if I'll ever forgive myself for.
    -A letter to Human Rights Watch ...and I'll keep posting this story every time slashdot advocates rape and moderators mod it up.

    1. Re:RAEP IS FUNNY GUY by mirio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These comments are very true. I've never been a prisoner, but my grandfather spent the last 12 years of his life incarcerated for a crime I sincerelly believe he did not commit.

      At the age of 68, he was accused of rape by a mentally distubed woman who had been in and out of mental institutions for almost 5 years (manic depression and many other problems). The woman said she raped him. My granfathers physician testified that my grandfather and been impotent since his mid-40's...this did not matter to the jury of 12 women (I kid you not) who convicted him. At any rate...there's much more to this trial that could become a NY times best-seller, but I don't have time to cover it here.

      Anyway, due to Georgia's 'tough of sex crime' laws, he was not allowed out of maximum security prison. There are prisons here for the elderly, etc. but we have to be tough of sex offenders so they have to languish in prison with 300lb beasts that will mistreat them.

      We would go and visit my grandfather until his death and he would often be bruised terribly down his forarms. Some of the younger inmates tried to help defend him but they couldn't always do so. After his death, one of the young inmates sent a suprisingly well-written letter describing that my grandfather was bruised because he would hold his hands arms in front of his face to defend himself.

      When my family complained to the warden we were literally told, "it's a prison...it's not supposed to be a nice place".

      In prison, most every inmate has some sort of job he or she must perform. My grandfather worked in the kitchen and consequently showered before the other inmates so he could prepare breakfast. One morning when the other inmates came into the shower they found him dead on the floor with a huge gash in the back of his head. The autopsy said he died of an annuerism but the coroner said she couldn't say it he was murdered or not because the severe head trauma could have caused the annuerism.

      I don't know if he was ever raped, but I do have my suspicians.

      And oh yeah...I won't even get into how Governer Zell Miller had my grandfather's case on his desk and was about to grant him a pardon when NOW (national organization of women) got word of it and picketed outside the state capital because they perceived Zell being soft on crimes against women. It made the local news and Zell backed down.