Slashdot Mirror


Electrical Shielding for the Homeowner?

AugstWest asks: "As more research comes out showing that high voltage electricity sources can cause cancer and other health problems, I was wondering what the geeks among us could come up with for electrical shielding ideas. I've got a high-voltage transformer just off my backyard to power the train that also runs practically through my backyard, and it would be nice if I could somehow shield us from it. Of course, if the shield could also be an induction coil to sap power for my house, that wouldn't suck either..."

96 comments

  1. Pb! by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1, Funny

    And not peanut butter, either. Lead!!

  2. Nine year old news for nerds by DaoudaW · · Score: 5, Informative

    As more research comes out showing that high voltage electricity sources can cause cancer and other health problems.

    Okay I RTFA because I thought this had been effectively pooh-poohed and was interested in seeing additional research. But TFA is from 1996!!?? and the poster has the audacity to claim this as more research!!?? Cliff, what were you smoking in you posted this? The other FA is concerned about breathing ions. Oh my gosh, I salted my beans at lunch and ingested ions!!

    This is really a new low for slashdot.

    1. Re:Nine year old news for nerds by toddbu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But TFA is from 1996!!??

      Obviously you weren't paying attention. It's clear that there's a conspiracy to cover up the truth here, because in nearly 10 years the [Clinton] White House hasn't commented on this issue. I for one am going to rush out and build a device to stop any more EMF from entering my home. I'll do that as soon as I finish building my equipment that prevents the last great White House coverup - alien anal probes.

      Seriously, I've thought about taking myself off Ask Slashdot, but it's like turning away when you're about to witness a train wreck. It's just too hard to ignore.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:Nine year old news for nerds by Intron · · Score: 1

      I went to a seminar on this topic at C-MU in the mid seventies where an industry rep was telling us how electric fields were harmless and that we could ignore them. One of my EE professors, Stan Charap, asked since they didn't care about the electric field then it should be OK to wrap a few turns of wire around his house and use the power for free. The rep immediately got upset and said "That would be stealing". He didn't seem to think his position was a little inconsistent.

      I think there have been a couple of studies over the years since then that attempt to link electric fields with brain tumors, but they don't seem to show a strong link.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  3. Faraday cage by danpat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Easy, build one of these.
    Of course, you could also cover your body with aluminium foil, that way, you'll be protected when you leave your house too!

    1. Re:Faraday cage by nocomment · · Score: 1

      You stole my post. Almost exactly, even the link to wikipedia. Well, if you do build a faraday cage just remember not to put the latch on the wrong side of the door like on a recent MythBusters episode.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:Faraday cage by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      C'mon! A true Slashdotter might build a Faraday cage, not to protect him from potentially harmful electromagnetic fields, but to protect him from p***ed off neighbors when he fires up his Tesla coil and screws up their TV reception on Super Bowl Sunday.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  4. My idea by yobbo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tin foil hat...

    1. Re:My idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget the cod piece.

  5. Rent a Gaussmeter by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 4, Informative

    And survey your living spaces. When my daughter was a couple years old and the powerline/childhood leukemia thing hit the news, I did just that. I relocated the main feeder cable from my meter to my breaker box to get the field down to zero in her room. I was able to do it by just pulling some giant staples out of the cable and moving it without disturbing connections. YMMV, hire an electrician for anything more invasive.

    As to the stuff not on your property, I'll bet that it's still undetectable thanks to the inverse square law.
    In any case, if it's bothering you, the first thing to do is rent the meter and do a survey.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Rent a Gaussmeter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can also buy a little "emf pager" that beeps if you're catching deadly rays. I remember reading about a Gauss Mouse a few years back.

      Besides, wth are you worried about emf if you are sitting in front of a CRT all day?

    2. Re:Rent a Gaussmeter by Telecommando · · Score: 4, Informative

      Besides, wth are you worried about emf if you are sitting in front of a CRT all day?

      Really. Your TV, CRT and anything in your house with an AC motor in it exposes you to far more EMF than the power lines.

      http://www.emfs.info/Source_Appliances.asp

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:Rent a Gaussmeter by r00t · · Score: 1

      Come on, this isn't hard

      *LCD flat panel monitor
      *DLP TV, or none at all
      *computer w/o fans
      *straight-edge shaver, or just grow a beard
      *towell to dry hair
      *gas range
      *heating and cooling unit in the garage or outside
      *tile floors, so no vacuum needed

    4. Re:Rent a Gaussmeter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The small appliances are all pretty low at 1 meter.

      http://www.emfs.info/Source_Appliances.asp

      But all of them (sans vacume) are lower at one meter than the constant exposure from transmission lines at over 75 feet.

      http://www.emfs.info/Source_overhead.asp

      So in this case, the parent post was entirely incorrect by a factor of about 5.

      My andecdotal observances.
      At my ex girlfriends house, only 15 yards from hight tension transmission lines, unprotexted floppy disk became unreadable after only a few days, She could only use old style wired phones, as no cordless would last more than a few weeks (and be almost unusable over the hum) If you touched the prongs on UNPLUGGED transformers (ie battery charger, clocks, radios) you could feel a significant shock. (on one old clock, it was over 90 V)

      I'm not a doctor, but lining in that can't be good for you.

  6. More Slashdot pseudo-science by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cliff, I've often thought that you are one of the best Slashdot editors. But this article should not have appeared on Slashdot.

    Slashdot often carries pseudo-science articles, especially recently. Slashdot editors need to be more careful about that. If you didn't listen in Physics class in college, talk to someone who did.

    1. Re:More Slashdot pseudo-science by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Quasi-rationally, leakage of PCBs from old transformers would be the only risk. It has been suggested previously that what little correlation there is to high-voltage lines and cancer has more to do with living in an industrial dump than the powerlines.

      Look up the earth's electrical and magnetic field, add in the fields from the powerline, represent this as a percentage, then go find something else to worry about. You're more in risk of your computer falling on you.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  7. A quick test by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personally, I believe that there are a lot more things a lot more ruinous to your health than a couple of humming wires stung out in your backyard. However, saying that, we'll move on.

    Ok, so you have a power line to supply trains running along the back of your house. Exactly how hot is it? 25kV? 66kV? Check the insulators - anything longer than a foot (or so) is high voltage, anything less is likely 3.3kV or below.

    If you don't have a field strengh meter, get an average 36W fluoro, go out to your backyard barefoot at night and hold one end. Wave it around a bit - if there's any serious amount of power around, it will light up the closer you get to the lines. Check how much it drops off between the back of your backyard and your house.

    Field strength drops off with the square of distance, so unless you're directly under 300kV lines, you probably have more pressing things to worry about, like that clock radio near your head when you sleep. Or the electric blanket that's millimeters away from you. Or the colour TV (or monitor) that is basically a particle accelerator.

    If the wires are an appreciable height above your roofline, and you are still concerned, earth out your roof (properly, with a ground stake,etc). This will shield the bulk of your house. Personally, as mentioned before, I'd go worry about other things, such as the resistant bacteria thats cropping up, or the apparent dwindling oil supply, or whether N. Korea gets The Bomb.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
    1. Re:A quick test by owlstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...or whether N. Korea gets The Bomb."

      Yeah, I worry about that too. Lets hope that Bush jr has just enough braincells not to drop it on North Korea.

    2. Re:A quick test by hankwang · · Score: 4, Informative
      Field strength drops off with the square of distance,

      Accidentally, you are be right here, but it is because of Coulomb's 1/r^2 law that applies to single point charges. For line-like charges, such as power lines, the field falls off as 1/r. With power lines, you actually have two line charges with opposite signs, that partially cancel out each other's fields. In that case, the field will fall off as 1/r^2 if you are further away from the lines than the distance between the lines.

      Summarizing:

      • point charge: field goes as 1/r^2
      • two opposite point charges (dipole): 1/r^3
      • line charge: 1/r
      • two opposite line charges (line dipole): 1/r^2

      I'll also mention that all this only applies to the electrical field. This electrical field is easy to shield out (grounded aluminum foil will probably do), even though I am rather skeptical of the health benefits. However, the huge currents in the power lines also create a magnetic field (falls of as 1/r^2) and that is almost impossible to shield unless you are willing to cover your house with mu-metal sheet (think $1000 per square meter) or several cm of mild iron. Again, I think this is more relevant for sensitive electrical equipment (microphones, guitar pick-ups) than for your health.

    3. Re:A quick test by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Yes, but H is 10^-9 magnitude less than E or something like that. I don't want to find my physics or electromagnetics books to find out for sure.

      There is no effort made really to shield MRIs, as it is not very practical. They're just kept far away from everything else that might be affected by them. Industrial MRIs are quite unshielded, too, except by distance. It's just easier to keep magnetically sensitive materials out of the area.

      When I worked at UCSD, I used to walk by the NMRI lab in Urey Hall outside. I did it once with a paper clip on a string, and it did get pulled out a bit when the MRI coil was energized...

      You don't wear a lead apron when you get an MRI, and your body part is inches away from a rather strong magnetic field. The health risks from MRIs are from the materials used as contrast agents, as they can invoke allergic reactions.

      Yet you wear that lead apron at the dentist's office when you're getting dental x-rays.

    4. Re:A quick test by hankwang · · Score: 1
      There is no effort made really to shield MRIs, as it is not very practical.

      An MRI magnet is a dipole, so the field drops as 1/r^3 instead of 1/r^2 as with the power lines. Moreover, it doesn't vary in time so it does not create inductive currents. You don't wear a lead apron when you get an MRI, and your body part is inches away from a rather strong magnetic field.

      Actually, the magnetic field goes through the body, that's the whole idea. :-) Lead wouldn't help. An iron coffin might shield out part of the magnetic field, but big chunks of iron have other unpleasant side effects in strong magnetic fields. Over here they somebody once walked into the mass spectrometer lab (which also involves a big helium-cooled magnet) carrying a wrench in his back pocket. It made a big dent in the apparatus and it took a couple of strong men to remove the wrench out of the magnetic field.

    5. Re:A quick test by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      "An MRI magnet is a dipole, so the field drops as 1/r^3 instead of 1/r^2 as with the power lines."

      Yea, a magnetic dipole... really unusual...

      Good luck finding a magnetic monopole (IE a "north" pole magnet without a south pole). If you really do find one be sure to notify the Nobel committee right away so they can start getting the prize ready for you.

    6. Re:A quick test by hankwang · · Score: 1
      Yea, a magnetic dipole... really unusual...

      Write down the equations for the magnetic field around a linear conductor and come back then with your smart remarks. A magnet only looks like a dipole if you are far away compared to the size of the magnet, and that is typically not the case with 100 km long power lines.

  8. 500 things more effective for better health/safety by antispam_ben · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just read John Stossel's [liberals-are-cringing] book "Give Me A Break!" and it has some actual facts concerning personal risks, something quite lacking in the media, and that also appears to be a problem the poster and editor appear to have. So here, off the top of my head, are just a few of many suggestions, any one of which will have a well-documented, much better chance of both improving one's health and lengthening one's life:

    1. Fasten seat belts always when in a moving car.
    2. Don't drive under the influence of alcohol or mind-altering drugs.
    3. Quit smoking
    4. Stay upwind of smokers
    5. Eat less fat and less meat, eat more fruits and veggies, especially raw ones.
    6. Do some aerobic exercise (swim/bike/run/jog/walk/skate) several times per week.
    7. Trade the VW Beetle (or other bad-in-a-crash car) for a Volvo (or other good-safety-record-for-its-driver vehicle).
    8. Don't drive when drunk/drugged drivers are most likely to be driving.

    Okay, I'm sure there are 492 other things that many people commonly do that have a proven, more detrimental effect on life and health ELF fields/living next to high-voltage power lines that people were so worried about in the 1980's and 1990's (the real danger to living near such lines is if one falls and hits the ground - you could be electrocuted by walking away from it! Hop (keep your feet together!) away, don't walk). Even if it's "scientifically proven" (or even a very strong statistical correlation shown) that cancer rates are higher near 60Hz high voltage (electrostatic fields) or high current (generating strong magnetic fields) lines, there are so many other things that we KNOW are MORE risky that any cost-benefit analysis would dictate that it's better to spend thousands of times more money on these other things before you even LOOK at whether ELF radiation kills 0.0001 person per million per year, or if it's even as much as 0.01 person per million per year.

    Slashdot's new look looks serious. And especially with responses like this (ELF is NOT news, and it's NOT Stuff That Matters), I'll have to come up with a more serious tagline.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  9. Steps to ridding your life of EMF by jsimon12 · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Don't use electricity, period. Especially all that nasty AC that runs throw all the walls in your house.
    2. Either deep underground or live in a Faraday cage (this may be tought without electricity).

    1. Re:Steps to ridding your life of EMF by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      [...] that nasty AC that runs throw all the walls in your house

      Uh-oh - I've got an anonymous coward running around in my walls? I knew they were on to me!

  10. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    7. Trade the VW Beetle (or other bad-in-a-crash car) for a Volvo (or other good-safety-record-for-its-driver vehicle).

    Ok, where exactly did you here that the Beetle is bad in a crash? Since when is Four stars considered "bad"?

    And let's not forget that (1) crash avoidance is more important than trying to be a "bubble", and if we're going to toss around marketroid allegations as truth I'd rather a distinctive (i.e., visible) beetle over a "safe" volvo, or (2) the more important measure of a "by the numbers" car is (fuel and non-fuel) economy, and both cars have a fair bit of credibility in that status. (To say nothing of the rather significant non-fuel economies you get with a slightly used or american-made car.)

    Anyway...

    This is the Ask Slashdot section. It's where someone asks a question, and they get an answer. In fact, this is a great question for Ask Slashdot, because there were already two great responses ("build a faraday cage" and "get a meter to test") already. It's the equivalent of a "letters to the editor" page, if you really want to stretch a newspaper paradigm to fit /.

    (And I'd change your "eat less meat / more vegetables" to a much more intelligent "see your doctor, ask him for diet advice, and follow it" line. Eating no meat and nothing but raw vegtebles is bad for you in entirely different ways than the inverse, but it's still bad for you.)

  11. theft of service by Eil · · Score: 1


    Of course, if the shield could also be an induction coil to sap power for my house, that wouldn't suck either..."

    1) That is theft. Even induced current isn't free.

    2) I believe the coil would have to be placed pystically around the transformer, and the train company would be bound to notice that at some point. See #1.

    1. Re:theft of service by Eil · · Score: 1


      pystically

      "physically", rather. Need to use that Google toolbar spellcheck thingy more often.

    2. Re:theft of service by yabHuj · · Score: 1
      1. No, it's not illegal - as long as you (and your coil) stay on your own ground and do not tamper with the power house. If you can tap power just by placing something on your own ground (*NOT* attached to the power house), then you are just "harvesting" stuff on your own soil. The argumentation is similar to harvesting fruits from the neighbour's tree if branches grow your ground (though only from those over your ground). In addition - if they complain - you can probably sue them for transgression as they are commercially using your ground without your permission... ;-)
      2. No - you must stay on your own ground, so nothing to be placed around the "foreign" power house. But with a gaussmeter or small coil + sensitive voltmeter you can deduct how the magnetic fields running and how your tapping-coil should be placed.
    3. Re:theft of service by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Forget all the bullshit explanations. Here's the deal about theft of service -- I will be simple:
      Is electricity something we normally have to pay for? Yes.
      If you don't pay, do you still continue to get power, or does the company shut it off for non-payment? They shut it off.
      Is the poster, among the dumbest people on all of slashdot, trying to take something that should be paid for? Yes.
      Is it theft of service? Yes.

    4. Re:theft of service by yabHuj · · Score: 1

      Basically a power house comes in two versions: well shielded or (nearly) not.

      If there is (good) shielding, there is no health risk and you cannot tap the leaking field (at least not above academical level). Noone is transgressing or tapping anything.

      If the power house is not shielded, the owner is sending out emag fields into Cliff's property - unasked for. So what Cliff does with this on his own ground is up to his own. As long as he is not exceeding his property limits and (especially) not touching anything of the powerhouse.

      And that last part is important: not touching anything (especially not attaching cables) and staying on his own ground.

      This really is comparable to the old neighbour conflict with fruits from a tree that has branches haning over the border onto/over the neighbour's lawn: the fruits from the tree belong to the person above which ground they hang. But of course the tree owner is allowed to cut the overhanging branch and the neighbour cannot do anything about that.

      Do you normally have to pay for fruits? Yes. If you don't pay for fruits falling from your neighbour's tree, what happens? He ignores it or cuts off the tree/branch. And if you don't pay? He can't do anything except ignoring or cutting off (well, complaining and shouting always is possible, but that's not the point). Is the poster (Chris) trying to take what is sent to his property? Yes. Is it theft? No.

      Back top coil-tapping the EM emissions of a leaking powerhouse: Chris can try to collect power with an air coil on *his*own* ground (*not* touch *nor* surround the powerhouse). OTOH he has no service claim against the power house owner who is always allowed to shut doen the power house or to install shielding or non-leaking transformators.

      There has been such a case here in Germany - where the power company lost against such a tapping air coil on a neighbour's ground property. This especially as it is a form of protest against missing shielding. IIRC he complained against high EM fields, thew company said "there is nothing leaking". So he coil-tapped. Then the powerhouse's company either has to confirm (too high) EM fields leaking and has to install proper shielding - or stay it's ground, insist that the shielding is sufficient and ignore the person tapping the "non-existing" or "neglectable" EM fields. But as I said: German law - I am not sure about a US equivalent.

    5. Re:theft of service by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, if you try to pystically extract power from a high-tension line you'll need the services of a good urologist.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:theft of service by gorim · · Score: 1

      Your fruit tree example is faulty.

      Under most local laws in the US, any part of a tree that crosses the fence/propery line is legally the property of that propery owner. It doesn't matter that the trunk of the tree happens to be owned by the other property owner.

      Thus, while you normally pay for fruit, you don't have to pay for fruit you do not own.

      On the other hand, EMF is electromagnetic waves. Just like in the US it is illegal to tap signals that you normally have to pay for, such as satellite TV, it would be illegal to tap, even at a distance, electrical power coils via induction.

    7. Re:theft of service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tampering with hardware sold for satellite tv subscription to get free satellite TV is illegal. Engineering your own system from the ground up is not. Manufacturing your own system for commercial distribution is illegal, sharing the blue prints is not.

      In rural areas cable companies transport their signal on parallel wires instead of coax (// = cheaper wire) so signal is radiated through the air and receivable with an antenna. When farmers were brought to court for getting free cable the cable company lost. It was ruled that the cable company is responsible for controlling the distribution of its signal Re: the fruit tree argument. The same would go for tapping power. If the power company doesn't want you to have free access to its "valuable" radiated power then they better sheild it.

    8. Re:theft of service by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      1. Yes, it is theft. There are laws on the books for this. This is because we have metered electricity instead of Tessla's idea of free wireless power beamed from power stations as electromagnetic waves...

      2. You don't need a coil to be placed next to the transformer. All you need is a properly pieced shape of metal. Think of a radio antenna - that's bascially a tool to steal power from the transformer. Granted, it's a small amount of power, but if you live next to a radio reciever, it's *quite* possible to light up light-bulbs with a device that's totally inside the house.

      Now, if you could get your kid in the right shape....

      As for protection, a faraday cage should do the trick ;-)

      --LWM

    9. Re:theft of service by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Under most local laws in the US, any part of a tree that crosses the fence/propery line is legally the property of that propery owner. It doesn't matter that the trunk of the tree happens to be owned by the other property owner.

      Are you sure about this? I did some looking on nolo.com about this, and, well...it's not clear. If a branch of a tree I own falls off and damages the neighbor's property, it's my responsibility (reasonable). If the neighbor decides he doesn't like the branches, and prunes them off, it's his bad, especially if the pruning harms the tree.

      If I park my car on the neighbor's lawn, he's perfectly allowed to complain, call the cops, etc., but not key in a new racing stripe.

    10. Re:theft of service by budgenator · · Score: 1

      point 1 is basicaly correct, even if point 1 is incorrect it's unlikely that a power company would complain because of the public hysteria over EMF, to make the complaint valid they would have to admit that enough power is leaking from their lines to make it worth while to steal which would fuel more public hysteria.

      I've heard of some places that had specific laws against inductive power taps, they would have great curiosity appeal, amase your friends back of the comic book type stuff put your not going to get any usable power out of it.

      I'm on the western edge of the north-east power grid, in Marysville Mi the HT lines cross the river into Canada and at one point on our side the 375KV at mucho amps is only 50 ft above the ground; you probably wouldn't want to carry an aluminum latter under that monster.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    11. Re:theft of service by hutchy · · Score: 1

      Bullshit!

  12. what's up with the voltage? by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, I wonder why this person is worrying about high voltage particularly? I mean, 60 Hz EM fields saturate his house already because of the electricity running all through the walls and ceilings. The fields are exactly the same frequency, photon energy, et cetera.

    Now, a 6000-volt (say) transformer has a field strength right next to it about 60 times higher than the field strength right next to a wall socket. But, thanks to the inverse square law, the field strength 10 feet away from such a transformer would be less than the field strength 1 foot away from a wall socket.

    And...he probably spends hours and hours within 1 foot of a wall socket, and isn't likely to be within 10 feet of the transformer very often at all...I mean, unless the transformer fascinates him strangely or something...

    1. Re:what's up with the voltage? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      A simple wall socket won't do anything. If there's no flow of current, there's no EMF. Now, the sockets that have things plugged in to them...

  13. Book that will tell you what you need to know by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    This book contains all the info you need for this project.

  14. Don't worry, be happy! by redelm · · Score: 1
    Listen: The voltage means nothing -- you get more walking across the carpet. 50/60 Hz means little -- it's dead slow compared to molecular vibration, and 'way to fast for chemicals. But if you want, just go buy a microwave leakage detector at RatShack. I'd be more worried about your cellphone.

    The XFO is a _good_ sign. They can't leak much and already have a Faraday cage around them. Best of all, an XFO is usually in the middle of a section, far away from those spark-inducing section isolation breaks. They create all kinds of nasty noise and ozone.

  15. Stossel likely meant old VW Beetle by jsimon12 · · Score: 2, Informative

    7. Trade the VW Beetle (or other bad-in-a-crash car) for a Volvo (or other good-safety-record-for-its-driver vehicle).

    Ok, where exactly did you here that the Beetle is bad in a crash? Since when is Four stars considered "bad"?


    If I remember the specific 20/20 it was back before the new Beetle came out, years ago. So he is saying the old VW Beetle, the one with the air cooled engine in the rear.

  16. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by jrockway · · Score: 1

    > "Use the product of mass and the integral of jerk, Luke."

    Use the force plus mass times a constant? Looks like someone didn't quite pass calculus.

    --
    My other car is first.
  17. Hats of Tin Foil by HalWasRight · · Score: 1

    I wear a Tin Foil Hat to protect /me from the negative health effects of "high voltage electricity sources". As I side benefit no one can hear the voices in my head but me, and the government has stopped controlling my every move!

    --
    "This mission is too important to allow you to jeopardize it." -- HAL
  18. You may need magnetic shielding, not electric by dimss · · Score: 1

    If you have large transformer close to home, you may need magnetic shielding, not electric one. First, try to estimate strength of magnetic field. Use simple open induction coil and multimeter for this. If you will find rather strong magnetic field, change your house or destroy transformer, because good magnetic shield for 60 Hz is difficult to create.

    Transformers, transmission lines, GSM base stations and radio/TV transmitters are very important things to check when you are looking for new home.

    I have 4 or 5 high-voltage transmission lines in 100-200m from our building. But this is not a big problem because reinforcement of walls acts as electric shield.

  19. EE eh? by Acire · · Score: 1

    Stealing by induction is illegal, obviously, and can be detected by the power company/owner easily and exactly. Basically any loop that is passed through an electic field will create induction, which wouldnt interfere with the electric field anyway. I know an electrician that has gotten cancer playing catch the electricity, but, unless you are talking a REALLY strong electric field, and very close proximity, do what everyone else says and worry about the mold in the walls or the rampaging duck.

    1. Re:EE eh? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      how do you know the cancer was caused by electrical fields?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:EE eh? by Acire · · Score: 1

      Has to do with the type of cancer, the way I understand it, though Im certainly not a doctor.

    3. Re:EE eh? by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      >Has to do with the type of cancer, the way I understand it, though Im certainly not a doctor.
      I think the parent question for you is in what way you understand it, and it appears that you don't.

  20. Why not kill two birds with one stone? by munpfazy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Rather than trying to shield an entire house, just build yourself a set of Orgone accumulators for every member of the family and spend as much time in them as possible.

    The thin metal walls are sure to do as good a job attenuating 60 Hz EMF as they do re-radiating orgone energy.

    You also might want to consider placing them in the left hand middle section of you home and painting them green so as to get as much Feng Shui benefit as you can while you're at it.

    Seriously, there are a lot of very real environmental hazards to worry about, but this isn't one of them. So far, decades of research have turned up no reliable evidence for risk associated with low level, low frequency electromagnetic fields, and no one can come up with an even slightly plausible mechanism by which they could damage the body.

    By all means, worry about what you're breathing, and the chemicals in your food and water. (And if you want to worry about things which are orders of magnitude more likely to do you in, consider how you get to work, your diet, and exercise regimen.) Don't worry about environmental EMF exposure.

    1. Re:Why not kill two birds with one stone? by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

      I think that you should use orgone generators instead of accumulators.

      see http://educate-yourself.org/dc/orgonegenindex.shtm l

    2. Re:Why not kill two birds with one stone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orgone accumulators are so 1950s. These days everyone uses large general-purpose orgone register sets.

    3. Re:Why not kill two birds with one stone? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Rather than trying to shield an entire house, just build yourself a set of Orgone accumulators for every member of the family and spend as much time in them as possible.

      The thin metal walls are sure to do as good a job attenuating 60 Hz EMF as they do re-radiating orgone energy. ...


      My god!

      What ever happened to tin-foil hats?

      They have worked wonders for many self-respecting geeks for a long time!

  21. No case to answer by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 5, Informative
    When your concerns are based on one old newspaper article and the word of a person who opposes fluoridation and vaccination, and makes money by advocating various dietary quackery (refined sugar's a deadly poison, popular "healthy" foods are hideously contaminated, chelation's good for what ails you...), it behooves you to expend a bit more energy making sure your concerns are, in fact, justified.

    I suggest you start with the World Health Organisation.

    1. Re:No case to answer by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      The fluoridation argument was not a good one. I won't read the page because I really don't care about wether the man is right or wrong, as I don't believe that powerlines' EMF are generally harmful. But though it might have always been done in the US, a lot of european countries don't add fluoride to the water, and for a lot of good reasons.

  22. Good topically on teeth... by StupidKatz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... doesn't mean something is good to ingest. There actually may be some truth behind the touted dangers of fluoridated water, aside from the whole matter of actually drinking something that really should only stay on your teeth for a while before being spat out.

    A google for "fluoridation sewage" or "fluoridation sludge" will give you an interesting look on where cities get the raw material to add fluoride to water, and it's not very appetizing, especially considering the trace amounts of heavy metals and other rather toxic materials that just aren't feasible to remove from the "product". Then consider the possibility of skeletal fluorsis, which occurs when too much fluorine is ingested, which is where the skeletal bones basically rot/disintegrate.

    Vaccination isn't without its dangers, although for the most serious viruses, polio, etc., the vaccination risk seems more than made up for. Refined sugar isn't a wise thing to stuff into your body, either. Maybe the guy is going overboard (haven't read about him, specifically), but there is certainly a grain of truth behind all that "whacky quackery".

    1. Re:Good topically on teeth... by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      Which body part should I cover with tinfoil to maximize its potential?

    2. Re:Good topically on teeth... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1
      Which body part should I cover with tinfoil to maximize its potential?
      Whichever part you don't want to cook too fast. I'd suggest the hands and feet, for starters, but you may find that you'll need to cover other parts depending on your oven and which bits you like extra crispy.

      Oh... you're talking mind control... sorry.

      Remember, the real reason orgone boxes were outlawed was that they interfered with the mind control beams. Also, "shiny side out" is a piece of government misinformation, as that actually maximises the effects of the mind control beams. You need shiny side in to be properly protected.

  23. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by happyDave · · Score: 1

    Since when did "eat less meat / more vegetables" become "eating no meat and nothing but raw vegetables"?

    Do you like to take everything to its most extreme conclusion? Honestly, there is nothing within that sentence that on its own supplied the implication of going "all the way." You took that one and ran with it on your own. People can start to control their eating habits and get benefits without consulting a doctor. And by the way, "control" does not mean "eliminate all of one substance."

  24. Here you go by Formica · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, this risk is massively overblown. That said, if you're truly paranoid, here you go: LessEMF.com They've got a complete line of electric shielding clothes, canopies, etc.: Personal EMF Shielding Devices They also have mu-metal cloth for making your own magnetic shield clothing.

  25. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    People can start to control their eating habits and get benefits without consulting a doctor.

    Not the sort of people who need to be told to control their eating habits, though. The same reactionary mind that looks at power lines too far away to detect without eyes or a camera as a threat will take an advice to "eat less meat and more vegetables" as a reason to toss their (and their family's) perfectly healthy balanced diet and become never-cooking vegans.

    You're right, though. There are other folk who can advise you on making a healthy diet. The FDA is probably a good place to start, and absent them a licensed dietician or even a grocer or high school health teacher.

  26. Tinfoil by John+Hasler · · Score: 1, Funny

    Make hats for your entire family (don't forget the pets!). It has to be real tinfoil, though. Aluminum won't do.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  27. Tear out the wallboard in the house by jhines · · Score: 1

    And replace with lead lined drywall, used for sheilding from Xrays and others.

    See http://www.radiationproducts.com/gypsum-board.htm for example, and other
    similar products.

    You may notice some problems with things like cell phone reception afterwards.

    1. Re:Tear out the wallboard in the house by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I do know it is a joke but wouldn't having all that lead around tend to be more harmful?
      Also wouldn't grounded wire mesh be more effective when dealing with EM?
      All and all I have to agree with majority of people here... I worry a lot less about EM than I do about slipping on ice while out walking... And I do live if Florida.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  28. Re:EMF by cow-orker · · Score: 1

    There are positive and negative electric charges, but only one kind of gravity "charge". This makes it possible to block EMF using a faraday cage, but impossible to block gravity.

    It also makes electromagnetic and gravitational fields completely incomparable, dimwit.

  29. Wrong Idea by Ed+Almos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Find either a physics or radio guy and ask them to explain about the inverse square law. Unless the transformer is underneath your house you need not worry.

    Ed Almos

    --
    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
  30. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by wakdjunkaga · · Score: 1
    I don't eat anything that wouldn't, if given half the chance, try to eat me first. Vegetables are very good at freezing in position, but make terrible stalkers, and just don't have the killer instinct.

    That said, I suppose it would be possible to build a structure of laminated hi mu silicon steel around a residential dwelling providing both magnetic and electrostatic shielding so long as no windows were provided, the door(s) fabricated to minimize leakage, and special measures were taken at entry points for air and so forth.

    EM field strength within such an enclosure would be effectively zero so long as all electrical devices of any sort (120/240V line supplies, phone lines, battery operated devices, etc.) remained outside the building.

    Not much of a home. Cheaper to build a cabin in a deep wilderness setting, and become a pre-1900's farmer/hunter/gather.

  31. Location location? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a high-voltage transformer just off my backyard to power the train that also runs practically through my backyard

    J F'n C, man... move!

  32. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by Petersson · · Score: 1

    7. Trade the VW Beetle (or other bad-in-a-crash car) for a Volvo (or other good-safety-record-for-its-driver vehicle).
    Not so long ago, Volvo sales manager for Russia was killed by lightning in the middle of his backswing while playing golf near Karlstejn castle (Czech republic, Europe). Playing golf while storm is coming shall be also on your list.

    --
    I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
  33. clueless? by r00t · · Score: 1

    You write "Just like in the US it is illegal to tap signals that you normally have to pay for, such as satellite TV"

    Uh, no. There are supreme court decisions that say you can do this.

    1. Re:clueless? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't the sat thing come down to 'you're free to recieve the signal, but breaking the encryption is illegal?'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:clueless? by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'm bathed in XM, cellular, WiFi, and DishNetwork signals now. I can receive them, but I cannot circumvent them legally. That's theft of service.

  34. Re:EMF by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
    This makes it possible to block EMF using a faraday cage, but impossible to block gravity.
    Lose weight.
    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  35. This isn't really pseudo-science by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
    Power distribution equipment does set up pretty large EM fields. Don't believe me? Walk under a powerline holding a plain ordinary 4' fluorescent tube on a fairly dark night.


    There is a substation a few miles from my house that can light up a plain ordinary compact florrie if you stand within 5' of the surrounding fence.

  36. Slash dotters over engineering as usual by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Why shield the whole house? bricks and morter are not effected but EM; Instead wear cloathing made with a wire mess sown in and a the ubiquitus foil hat, that way you can take it with you.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  37. This is really pseudo-science by jesup · · Score: 3, Informative

    High-voltage stuff does have significant fields - though any effect on humans is far, far from proven. The flourescent light trick is cool (and scary to some), but means little. The whole worries over power lines seemed to spring originally from the reporting over Love Canal. Most people don't understand electricity, and the idea of an unseen field flowing through their body is unnerving to them (irregardless of the facts).

    Most of the studies of power-lines have trouble accounting for the fact that housing prices right next to HV powerlines are noticably lower - originally mostly for esthetic and sound reasons, now also due to fear of the unknown. In addition to causing different demographics of buyers, there are other related issues. For example, when planning powerlines, they don't just draw a line across a map - they try to minimize the cost of buying the land. Guess what? Brownfields are cheaper, and industrial area have less people objecting than "virgin" suburban land. And once the lines are in, businesses are more likely to be willing to set up shop under/near HV power lines - esthetics isn't as important to them, price is. Businesses (especially in already-low-value areas) tend to be the ones most likely to release toxins (you don't often see that in farmland). Untangling all this is really tough.

    This causes a difference in demographics that's hard to account for. And even so, the demographics don't scream "cause".

    More to the point, the original commentor was correct - this question is at best misleading and at worst promotes yet more bad science thinking by assuming facts not in evidence. I wonder how many readers won't notice TFA is from 1996, or won't even read it and assume the poster is correct about "increasing evidence".

    1. Re:This is really pseudo-science by shlashdot · · Score: 1

      "Businesses (especially in already-low-value areas) tend to be the ones most likely to release toxins (you don't often see that in farmland)."

      Not that this affects your main point, but I think farms release more toxins than most other businesses these days. Crop dusters, particulates, diesel exhaust, etc.

      --
      Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
    2. Re:This is really pseudo-science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. So what ? by dec0077 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so you have a big transformer near your backyard. Why should you consider it a problem ? Aside from the fact that "big" is a relative term (for train power it cannot be that big, since these are most likely in the 6-12 kV range, certainly not as one found attached to a EE transport backbone), what is of importance here is the fact that the frequency of the electric and magnetic fields is 50 Hz (oops, forgot you are in the USA, make that 60 Hz) and its 3rd and 5th armonics, hence, for you, 180 Hz and 300 Hz, because these are the non-negligible frequencies of the fields you get from a powerline.

    Frequency is relevant because with it you have the wavelenght of the field and, in order to decide if the field is dangerous to your health, you have to compare this lenght with the dimension of your cells. Since at 50-60 Hz the wavelength is in the range of thousands of kilometers (and for 300 Hz it's not that much shorter) it's easy to see that you don't have a problem living near one of these things.

    This is the exact same reason why cellphones are much more suspicious and why x-rays are confirmed to cause cancers: their frequency (around 10^24 Hz, IIRC) implies the wavelength is much shorter than a cell, making them able to damage it.

    The reason this is relevant is because, with long wavelength, the [magnetic | electric] potential at different points in the cell is identical, while with short wavelengths it is not: in this case you have [magnetic | electric] currents that run through your cells (organic tissues are conductive, so you can use the simple model of an impedance), and with current you have heat, inducted currents, parasite currents, etc...

    Even for really high voltage lines (i don't know the operative voltages in the USA) there is no issue: in Italy we divide voltages in 3 ranges: 220-380 volt is low voltage, 4.5-23 kV is medium voltage (secondary distribution stations, trains, production plants), and the three high voltages: 130 kV (primary distribution stations), 220 kV and 380 kV (backbones, power plants connections); only for the high voltages, there is a rule of thumb to follow: when you are farther out from the powerline than 5 meters plus 1 centimeter for kV, you are well in the safety area (so for a 380kV line you have to be at least 8.8 meters from the wires; if you are directly under the line, but it's high in the sky, you are clear).

    Bye,
    Alberto

    1. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you explain meat cooking when put next to a transmitter?

    2. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a transmitter is likely operating at high power/with a highly directional antenna and operating in the microwave range. With power lines, we're talking wavelengths that are several orders of magnitude longer than microwave transmitters.

  39. Counteracting the effects by boring,+tired · · Score: 1

    Good diet and exercise should counter the effects.

  40. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    The safe one is officially the "New Beetle", not the "Beetle". The "VW Beetle", while only recently discontinued in Mexico, was not a four-star safe car, wheras the "VW New Beetle" is significantly more safe (if not any less horrible to look at).

  41. Sn! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    Lead??? Please, you mean tin!

    As in "foil"

    --LWM

  42. radio waves! by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    Not quite, I think. The wires in the wall will function as antennae, with a terrible SWR, to be sure. They will radiate radio waves at 60 Hz, just like this fellow's worrisome transformer does even when the trains aren't running. So there will be a very small current all the time to supply the energy emitted as radio waves.

    On the other hand, as you point out, when he fires up (say) his electric range and gets 10 to 20 amps flowing through those coils on top -- look out! Not only does he have strong EMF fields right near his (or the wife's) face, but he's irradiating his food with them.

    Hopefully he's got a gas range. (We needn't consider the folly of a microwave, of course.)

  43. ... and don't charge your cellphone at home! by hadaso · · Score: 1

    I have an electric company transformer exactly two floors under me. It supplies the elecricity for at least our building and one other nearby building (about 30 apartments). A friend of the family that operates a gaussmeter for a living came over and made some measurements around the transformer and in my home and said I had nothing to worry about and the radiation from that transformer is extremely low. When I asked him what does this "low" means practically, he asked if I have some transformer. I plugged in one little 1000mA general purpose transformer I bought at Ace, and the radiation it produced was more than a thousand times more than that produced by the electric company transformer.

    So perhaps "cheap" produces more radiation than "powerful"...

  44. Re:500 things more effective for better health/saf by feijai · · Score: 1
    Ok, where exactly did you here that the Beetle is bad in a crash? Since when is Four stars considered "bad"?
    Hmmm... my Mazda Protege5 (unranked) is a bit heavier/safer car than the Protege 4-door, which gets 5/4/3/5 compared to the Beetle's mere 4/4/5/3. And I think that's less safe than I'd like. And let's be serious: a 2005 Honda Civic 4-door gets 5/5/4/4. Now that's a safe car.
  45. Good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots and lots of that nice, safe lead should keep you from being poisoned by those nasty power lines! ;-)

  46. Less EMF, Problem Appliances by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    You can order stuff from lessemf.com. They have magnetic shielding material too.
    I bought some from them to shield an inductor that was sensitive to nearby magnetic fields, but it didn't really help. Now I'm on their mailing list, though, and they have a lot of stuff that sounds like it's right in your market.

    What bothers me these days is front-loading washing machines. They have AC variable frequency motors and lots of unshielded computer control components in them, and due to a quirk in the FCC regulations that assumed appliances wouldn't have mostly motors and gears, they are exempt from many of the requirements for Part 15 compliance. My Whirlpool Duet plays havoc with MF, MF, and VHF. I'm going to sell it and get a top-loader with big gears and stuff inside.

  47. A quibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that the currents in the power lines are balanced. ie. there is no ground current. That means that the magnetic field due to the current in one line is cancelled by those in the other two (assuming three phase). So, if the lines are separated by five feet and you stand fifty feet away, the field you measure will be negligible.

    1. Re:A quibble by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Not negligible, but O(1/r^2) rather than O(1/r) for a single wire. My point is that the field reaches further than with a confined dipole [O(1/r^3)].

    2. Re:A quibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we're not dealing with a dipole here. The fields due to the wires actually cancel. That's why balanced lines are pretty much immune to noise pickup and radiation. The spacing of the wires really matters. That's why I placed the observer ten times farther away than the wires were spaced apart.

      A practical example would be a bifilar winding in which the turns are wound back against themselves. For all practical intents and purposes, there is no magnetic field.

      I do agree that the field that is left after cancellation does decrease as the inverse of the cube root. The mistake that most people seem to make is starting with the field due to one conductor and assuming that's what they have to deal with.

  48. Summary -- it's hard to tell. by ankhank · · Score: 1