Slashdot Mirror


Blog Binging Gorges the Net

Site Pixie writes "Most blogs are created by someone you don’t know, often about something you don’t care about, but that hasn’t stopped ‘blogging’ from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon. There are even blogs about blogs such as The Blog Herald. It looks like everyone wants their fifteen minutes of fame online. Estimates put the number of blogs to be in the tens of millions, with several factors influencing the count, such as whether a blog is available for public or private consumption. Carl Bialik investigates the intricacies of counting blogs, and shows how blog indexing sites like BlogPulse and Technorati are bursting at the seams with thousands of new blog entries everyday."

214 comments

  1. how about calling them... by yagu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just another internet fad (though useful to some degree, if they're good).

    But may I suggest rather than blog, we could call them blahgs, or even blah-blah-blahgs.

    1. Re:how about calling them... by SlayerofGods · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or at least mix it up a little.
      Hearing the word 'blog' 12 times in one summary is enough to make one's head explode.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    2. Re:how about calling them... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I don't think "blogs" per say will go away, but the "blogging phenomena" certainly will go in much the same way as the "Personal Home Pages" of the late 90's. The *idea* of tools that allow you to quickly publish articles is sound enough, and is something I and many others have used quite a bit in lieu of proper publishing tools. This is a good thing because it speeds the time and reduces the overhead between writing an article and making it available on the 'net. The "blogging phenomena" OTOH, is people who use the tools to talk about their cat or the guy who flipped them off in traffic today. My feeling is that these blogs provide no long-term value and will likely experience decline as more professionally done blogs take over.

    3. Re:how about calling them... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then you would probally hate this.

      This is one of my pet peeves.

    4. Re:how about calling them... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0, Troll



      http://www.microsoft.com/>Ohh, this is so much fun!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:how about calling them... by FlameTroll · · Score: 0

      If you think that's bad, just imagine what happens next-- after a binge there's always a purge.

      --
      A simple Troll, born of Rock and Fire, leaving in the basement of my parents volcano and typing on an asbestos keyboard.
    6. Re:how about calling them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't think blogs per se will go away.

    7. Re:how about calling them... by DigitumDei · · Score: 2

      Isn't the "blogging phenomena" just the personal home page of today. I'd say that the personal home page didn't so much disappear as evolve, not that it really matters.

      Blogs will evolve, and eventually they too will not longer be a fad, at which point most properly run news and information blogs will cease to be called by that name and just become "old fashioned" news sites.

    8. Re:how about calling them... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0, Troll
      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:how about calling them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      People mod things "overrated" because "overrated" and "underrated" do not show up in metamoderation. If you're really that concerned about your karma, you can just post AC. Keep your original account, though--you'll need something to metamoderate everything as unfair.

      Oh, and moderators? Go fuck yourselves. I got karma to burn, bitches.

      --
      Waiting for that cold day in hell when /. gets its shit together

    10. Re:how about calling them... by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      This http://lfw.org/jminc/blog/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/ hi/uk_politics/4284710.stm BBC news story now looks a lot more fittting.

    11. Re:how about calling them... by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      "these blogs provide no long-term value[...]more professionally done blogs [will] take over."? Neither do the conversations I have with people all day. Should I ignore everyone that I don't think will provide long-term value? Should I let professionals take over my personal conversations? Someone who blogs about the guy who flipped them off in traffic today, is blowing off steam talking to some friends, and doesn't have to justify that to anyone.

    12. Re:how about calling them... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Some are blogging as a fad, but I've been blogging semi-regularly since 2002 as a way to journalize my trip to Ottawa for friends, family, and me. I posted pictures and stories of my travels, and more recently I've made it a nearly daily log of things I've been talking about online, articles I've written [for slashdot even], and pictures I've taken.

      Useful? To me it's a personal historical reference tool, so yeah. To Joe Blow from Idaho? Maybe not, but he might get a laugh out of it anyway, so I'm happy to help in that regard.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    13. Re:how about calling them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that kinda reminds me of this.

  2. Google Blogsearch by garcia · · Score: 3, Informative

    Carl Bialik investigates the intricacies of counting blogs, and shows how blog indexing sites like BlogPulse and Technorati are bursting at the seams with thousands of new blog entries everyday.

    Technorati has always been slow for me and somewhat outdated. Google's Blogsearch, OTOH, seems fairly current and loads much faster.

    I have only seen a few hits from Technorati (ending up at my site) but quite a few more coming from Google, starting only in the last 10 days or so.

    1. Re:Google Blogsearch by jbum · · Score: 1

      While Google's Blogsearch is more comprehensive, it does a terrible job of filtering out spam blogs.
      Many spam blogs are hosted on Google's own Blogspot, which they seem to mine exhaustively, sadly.

      I find that both Technorati and Blogpulse produce fewer, but more relevant results.

    2. Re:Google Blogsearch by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      I find that both Technorati and Blogpulse produce fewer, but more relevant results

      Luckily I have never run into that problem myself but I will keep an eye out for it.

    3. Re:Google Blogsearch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish google had the "non-blog search" meaning that I could add say "blog:no" to a search and it won't give me any results that were in a blog.

    4. Re:Google Blogsearch by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Adding the term
          -blog
      ought to be pretty effective; most blogs tend to have the word "blog" somewhere on the page, and most non-blogs tend to lack it.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  3. Second Spam by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blogs are turning into the second spam of the internet. Some of them are legitimate and interesting, but a vast majority are not.

    --
    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    1. Re:Second Spam by Peaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I could say the same about some Slashdot comments.
      But I won't, because I chose to read your comment, it was not shoved down my throat.

    2. Re:Second Spam by mysqlrocks · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is the idea behind BlogPulse, Technorati and Google Blog Search. They're supposed to help us sort out the good stuff from the crap just like search engines help us sort out relevant web sites from crappy ones. How successful they are at this is up for debate.

    3. Re:Second Spam by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, the great power of a "weblog" (I hate the word "blog") is that it allows a normal, lowly, everyday human being to share his ideas and voice his opinions. The great failing of weblogs is that they allow normal, lowly, everyday human beings to share their ideas and voice their opinions.

      Actually, that's been the power and failing of the internet all along. Anything which gives power to the common man, letting us hear his good ideas, unfortunately also gives power to the common man, giving us access to his incessant prattle. Really, what do you want? Do you want some large media company sifting through and deciding what's good?

      I'd rather have access to weblogs, at least so long as they are distinguished from spam in one factor: they aren't showing up in my inbox uninvited. Say as much as you want for however long as you want in your own weblog, and as long as I have to actively choose to read it, fine by me.

      If you don't like my weblog, there's a simple solution. Don't visit it.

    4. Re:Second Spam by Homology · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Blogs are turning into the second spam of the internet. Some of them are legitimate and interesting, but a vast majority are not.

      In what way are the majority of blogs not legitimate? Oh wait, I'm sure there are positions available in some American company helping the Chinese government to stiffle free speech. Of course, this is entirely legitimate. But hey, Cash is King, and we won't let small things like common decency stop us for making a killing

    5. Re:Second Spam by interiot · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Confusing post.

      If you mean intentional spam, then it's not the second by far (usenet spam or instant-message spam came first).

      If you mean unintentional spam, then you're misusing the word. You can more or less avoid bloggers you dislike, because unlike real spammers, they aren't single-mindedly trying to insert themselves into as many inboxes and search results as they possibly can.

    6. Re:Second Spam by mustafap · · Score: 1

      At least blogs are well contained and dont run rampant around the internet like a Chavs offspring in a shopping mall.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    7. Re:Second Spam by version5 · · Score: 1

      I can't decide what's more childish: the analogy you made, or the attitude behind it. Try considering that maybe the whole world need not revolve around you and what you consider interesting.

      --

      "It's Dot Com!"

    8. Re:Second Spam by cowscows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, so the vast majority are not interesting to you. The vast majority are not interesting to me. But that doesn't make them valueless. Just about every blog out there has value for at least one person, the author, and most likely at least a few others. My blog should be of little interest to you, yet for my family and friends it's a useful source of information about me and what I'm up to.

      The only way that blogs can really be compared to spam is perhaps in search engine rankings, where they can muddy the results much like a link farm or whatnot. But I think blaming the blogs themselves is wrong, because that's not what they're trying to do. It's up to google and the others to engineer a solution to this problem.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    9. Re:Second Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not spam if you don't have to see it. To quote Spock: "It doesn't matter if the universe is 99% crap if you can teleport from one good spot to another."

    10. Re:Second Spam by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because you have thoughts doesn't mean they need to be shared. The average blogger reminds me of the average loudmouthed kid who has to make every single thing that goes through his mind every second of the day known to the world.

      Okay, you hate George Bush. Wow. That's unique. Great, you hate pinko commie liberal hippies. Good for you. What a unique perspective. You're said about Brad and Jennifer breaking up. Oh, dear - I'm so glad you took the time to communicate that with the world. Your head hurts and your boyfriend dumped you - hurrah. We're so glad to be kept up to date on this. You found an interesting site to link to... wonderful for you.

      Every person on the face of the earth does not need a public diary and soap box in the same way that we don't need 800,000,000 television stations so that every single individual can have their own television station to broadcast their drivel on.

      And what it still comes down to is that almost all blogs are nothing but a giant ego stroke. People trying to post things that present themselves in such a way as to gain "friends" and attention and make people like them. It's all about "look how neat I am. look at how interesting my thoughts are - don't you want to know me and post on my blog and link to me?"

      If you're Seamus - the xbox designer - you might have some great stuff to say on your blog. If you're Seumas, the software engineer who runs a massive free niche auction site but are an otherwise normal person with nothing groundbreaking to say that hasn't already been said a million times in this world through every medium - why should you create a "blog" and throw your every stupid observation, commentary and rundown of your daily personal life out there on the net for six billion potential people to view? Who gives a fuck? You're nobody and you're not unique or interesting.

      THE PROBLEM WITH BLOGGING IS THE SELF DELUSION THAT YOU BELIEVE YOU MATTER OR THAT PEOPLE GIVE A FUCK WHAT YOU SAY.

      And what is the difference between someone posting a message on Slashdot and running their own blog? A blog is about me me me with frequent updates about me me me in some way. Posting to slashdot is offering a one-time statement in a community of voices regarding the current subject.

      And I don't care if people think "slashdot was the first big blog". Slashdot is no more a blog than CNN or FOXNEWS or BBC.COM is. It's just another site with news - except that you can comment on the news items (just like you can at Yahoo! news and elsewhere). Since when does everything that isn't static and has an update on some variably frequent or infrequent basis become a "blog"? If you put up a website and never change it, it's a website? But if you put up a website and you update it over the years, it's a blog?

      I differentiate blogs from websites based on the criteria of "things I have to say and a place for you to discuss what I have to say with me". Websites may be about you. But blogs are about desperate attempts to build a community around *YOU*. Though occasionally put to good use by certain worthy individuals, often exploited to a useless degree by the self-important blog-cliques.

      And for fuck's sake, if you're going to have a "blog", please at least call it a website anyway. When someone tells me to "check out my blog" or "take a look at my livejournal" or I see that it's just a blog from a cookie cutter domain that spits them out with the difficulty of signing in with an email address (instead of having to install drupal or something), it makes me *not* want to go to your site. And chances are, I never will because of it. Just like I would never want to go sit in your bedroom and read y our stupid journal.

    11. Re:Second Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have something worth saying or you think we should give a fuck about you MAKE A WEBSITE. Not a fucking blog.

      I don't get it. So the difference is that the html says <TITLE>My Website</TITLE> instead of "My Blog"? Google will index it either way, if you're whining about emo whiners whining about the latest music release when you google for the latest indie music release for you to whine about on your WEBSITE.

    12. Re:Second Spam by syncomm · · Score: 0

      They were neet before that "one guy" coined the term Blog(tm) *gag*. Now they are the new tag.

    13. Re:Second Spam by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      no no no

      Elvis is King

    14. Re:Second Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you make no sense. slashdot is not like cnn, foxnews, or the bbc. there are no original news reports here. only summaries of articles that are elsewhere. with comment by blowhards like you... ie, a blog.

    15. Re:Second Spam by ThaFooz · · Score: 1

      they aren't single-mindedly trying to insert themselves into as many inboxes and search results as they possibly can

      You would be incorrect - spamming (in regards to search engines) means to artificially and/or unethicaly inflate the ranking of a site.

      The major search engine algorithms rank based on some combination of keyword relevance, user rating, and link quality/count, (possibly other criteria, who knows?). How they weigh each factor, how (and who) they blacklist, and how they detect spam is of course a hugely guarded secrete, but the bottom line is that links in blogs or signatures can increases the rank of the page that it points to - and can often allow junk sites to raise to the top of search engine rankings.

      I guarentee that you would be suprised to learn the percentage of blogs out there that are just spammers trying to push their viagara/gambling/free ipod schemes. So just because the blog itself its not in your inbox and doesn't appear in any of your searches, it doesn't mean that its not degrading your experience on the internet.

    16. Re:Second Spam by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful
      THE PROBLEM WITH BLOGGING IS THE SELF DELUSION THAT YOU BELIEVE YOU MATTER OR THAT PEOPLE GIVE A FUCK WHAT YOU SAY.
      Nope. The problem with "blogging" is the delusion by some outsiders that most bloggers care all that much about interesting their readers.

      Like many Slashdotters, I have a "blog" myself. I write it for an audience of one. If someone expresses an interest in something I've written, as they do from time to time, it's interesting and, to a limited extent, I'll engage in the odd argument, but for the most part, the blog exists for me to let off steam. As a location I can rant about politics, computers, cellphone companies, Slashdotters, open source and free software, and other stuff, without actually boring the pants off the people around me or offending them. Sometimes I'll ask a question in the hope it'll be answered, but for the most part, I honestly don't care. The only real interactive nature of it is that after a while, if and when people do look occasionally enough to think it worthwhile looking regularly, you end up with a little community of people who are interested in each other's stuff. Kind of like a group of people who hang out at a pub. That's really the only reason it ends up going online.

      And I don't think most bloggers care either. Do you think the 14 year old who explains in great depth how Snuggles shat all over her mother's best rug today and how yesterday Mike (urgh!) broke up with her AGAIN really considers this more than a version of her diary with the potential for the odd bit of feedback?

      As far as calling a blog a website and other stuff. Why? Amazon's "just a website" too, as is "Cingular.com" and "Yahoo". A blog is a relatively specific form of website, it's an online journal (and not a "home page" as at least one person argued. This (NSFW! NSFH either, come to think of it...) is a home page, and this is a blog.) It may be a stupid sounding name, but it's nonetheless describes a particular type of website rather than "all websites". Would I prefer a term like "journal"? Probably, that'd probably be more reasonable, and some people - and for the most part I myself do - use that term instead. But you're not suggesting "journal", you're suggesting "website", which I'll start calling blogs the day I drive to building in my vehicle every period of day, driving back to other building in my vehicle while stopping by another building to get products on the way back every some other period of day.

      My advice: lose the snobbery. And if you feel posting your unsolicited feelings and news on the web should be beneath anyone, you might want to reconsider your policy of involving yourself in Slashdot discussions. You're missing the point, in a way far sillier than any teenager who writes about their cat is.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:Second Spam by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I think the analogy is apt. Spam clogs inboxes, worthless blogs clog search engine results. Reading is not the point. You don't have to actually _read_ either one for it to interfere with your productivity, the sheer volume losing other content in the noise is the problem.

      I wish there was a meta tag or something that all blogs used indicating that it is in fact a blog, so that search engines could easily filter the results. If I could filter the crap blogs from my search results, I would agree with you that they are not being shoved down my throat.

    18. Re:Second Spam by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I totally disagree. I think it is a bad analogy. You have a right to speak, but I have no obligation to listen. Blogs exercise the former but do not violate the later. Spam violates the later. If search engines are being clogged with uninteresting results, then the engines should be improved.

      What you are arguing is like saying the library should only have comic books because that's all you want to read.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    19. Re:Second Spam by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      > You're nobody and you're not unique or interesting.

      That is the problem. Everyone is unique. Everyone is interesting.

      All 6 billion people on this planet. (Watch someone post under me with "6.5" or whatever).

      There is nothing unique about being unique
      There is nothing interesting about being interesting.

      The idea that "Only interesting people should post" is silly.

      Far better to say "Only interesting ideas/information should be posted".

      How do you tell what's interesting? If it's not interesting to you, might it be interesting to others?

      How do you find things that are interesting to you?

      That last one is hard. Search engines are not it. Web rings are not it. Hmm...

      Maybe something that puts RSS feeds from ring sites into a ring update overview?

      But even then, a site may have posts on lots and lots of different topics (slashdot :-). We'd need the ring update rss (rurss) to ring articles instead of sites.

      Keybounce
      p.s. "Squiggleslash"? I love the name

    20. Re:Second Spam by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      For the most part I agree...

      But dayum, man. Are you having a bad day? We usually pad the truth a least a little bit. You might have hurt someone's feelings.

      I'm going to read your post again just to chuckle. :)

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    21. Re:Second Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will disagree. In fact, I could careless if anyone ever reads my blog. I post because I feel the need to say something about nothing. My blog is a diary of sorts, ideas, thoughts, or events that I feel I would benefit from later. So I will keep blogging and blogging and blogging till my little fingers are numb and then I will keep blogging because that which does not kill you only makes you stranger (Trevor Goodchild, AEON FLUX).

      "SELF DELUSION" you are self delusional. Point: "THE PROBLEM WITH BLOGGING IS THE SELF DELUSION THAT YOU BELIEVE YOU MATTER", then "Like many Slashdotters, I have a "blog" myself. I write it for an audience of one". You are delusional also so have fun with your self delusions. Hypocrite!

    22. Re:Second Spam by Kelson · · Score: 1

      You're missing a critical point, which is that not all blogs are worthless, and that worth depends entirely on what you're searching for.

      For instance, someone looking for information about red pandas is going to have trouble if they search for "firefox." Not blog related at all, but for that person, all this junk about some web browser is worthless crap clogging their search results.

      Sure, there are a bunch of blogs that probably aren't going to help you much... but what about the guy who spends 8 hours trying to research a tech problem, finally figures it out, and posts a detailed summary on his blog? If the information you want is buried in one cryptic mailing list post from three years ago that doesn't use many of the phrases people are likely to search for, you might actually be better off if that blog entry is included in your search results.

      Daring Fireball has a term for this: Writing for Google.

      What you *really* want to do is filter the crap from your search results, not filter the blogs. And you know what, that's what the search engines want to do, too. A "blog" meta tag isn't going to help.

    23. Re:Second Spam by interiot · · Score: 1
      I guarentee that you would be suprised to learn the percentage of blogs out there that are just spammers

      Umm, read your parent post a couple more times. You're talking about "intentional spamming", and it's not the second wave of internet spam. More like the third through twentieth, depending on how you count all the other cracks and crevices the spam vermin have crawled into before they settled down in the bowels of the blogosphere.

    24. Re:Second Spam by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      THE PROBLEM WITH BLOGGING IS THE SELF DELUSION THAT YOU BELIEVE YOU MATTER OR THAT PEOPLE GIVE A FUCK WHAT YOU SAY.

      And what is the difference between someone posting a message on Slashdot and running their own blog? A blog is about me me me with frequent updates about me me me in some way. Posting to slashdot is offering a one-time statement in a community of voices regarding the current subject.


      And how does posting to slashdot make people give a fuck what you say? Posting on Slashdot is worse than posting on the blog, because you're raising your voice in a place where people are trying to have a discussion, and as we've established, no one gives a fuck what you say, so you're interferring in the conversation. If you were posting on a blog, no one would be forced to wade through your crap when trying to read about the subject.

    25. Re:Second Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I will disagree. In fact, I could careless if anyone ever reads my blog.
      I think what you meant to write was "I couldn't care less if anyone ever reads my blog" given the rest of your paragraph, so I'm not entirely sure why you're suggesting you disagree with me.
      "SELF DELUSION" you are self delusional. Point: "THE PROBLEM WITH BLOGGING IS THE SELF DELUSION THAT YOU BELIEVE YOU MATTER", then "Like many Slashdotters, I have a "blog" myself. I write it for an audience of one". You are delusional also so have fun with your self delusions. Hypocrite!
      Huh? How am *I* self delusional? How am *I* hypocritical? What I wrote was entirely consistant. I disagreed with the person who wrote "The problem with blogging is the self delusion that you believe you matter", by pointing out that I write for an audience, essentially, of myself, and that I believe that to be the norm. It'd be hypocritical if I were agreeing with the quote from the grandparent.

      I'm going to make a guess that just as you can't write ("I could careless"), you can't read either. Good job I'm not the only one who writes for an audience of one!

      - S. (Posted AC because you did)

    26. Re:Second Spam by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I think the analogy is apt. Spam clogs inboxes, worthless blogs clog search engine results.

      The difference is in who to blame. Spammers are to blame for clogging up your inbox. If Google choose to search the Internet, and do so poorly, that's their problem (or alternatively, your problem for using poor search terms - I must say, I've never had trouble with useless blogs clogging my results, I'd be curious if people could give some examples?)

      I wish there was a meta tag or something that all blogs used indicating that it is in fact a blog, so that search engines could easily filter the results.

      Ah yes, we could go back to the bad old days of search engines when we relied on meta tags in the page to tell the search engine what it was about. We all know how well that worked.

      (Hint - no one who wants their page to be searched will include the "blog" tag, or they'll just disagree that it should count as a blog - consider how many people insist that Slashdot isn't a blog, even though it can clog search engine results just the same. And those who don't want their page searched can already use the no robots tags.)

    27. Re:Second Spam by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, the irony.

      Okay, you hate George Bush. Wow. That's unique. Great, you hate pinko commie liberal hippies. Good for you. What a unique perspective. You're said about Brad and Jennifer breaking up. Oh, dear - I'm so glad you took the time to communicate that with the world.

      Oh, you hate blogs. Thanks for sharing.

      "You're nobody and you're not unique or interesting." So why bother posting?

      The Slashdot articles might be comparable to a news site, but the comments posted fit every criticism you make of "blogs".

      Also I should add: I do have these people who care about what I do or write. They're called friends.

  4. ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blogs are glorified web pages are they not?

    Just like podcasting used to be called --- audio files, duh!

    1. Re:ugh... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      No...
      It's mostly a capture of people having a seizure on their keyboard.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    2. Re:ugh... by russellh · · Score: 1

      Blogs are glorified web pages are they not?

      Sure, but they have a standard form. and a fairly standardized language, even a standard tone. It is no longer funny and ironic, for instance, to describe your writing as "rants" or "ramblings", etc. (even though they are).

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    3. Re:ugh... by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      Blogs are glorified web pages are they not?

      They are systems of web pages. But yes, underlying it all are the same old Web standards we're familiar with.

      Eric
      How to masquerade your browser
    4. Re:ugh... by FLEB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And web pages are glorified HTTP responses.

      Blogs' improvement over webpages is that it's amazingly simple to build and maintain the page, meaning that nearly anyone with half a brain can get a "write-mode" Internet presence that looks good. Today's blogs would have just been yesterday's seizure-inducing, flashing, malformed Geocities page (if it existed at all).

      Podcasting isn't all that revolutionary in its parts, but it was more of a chemical reaction among the technologies of web audio (and the bandwidth to carry it), RSS with Enclosures and automated downloaders, (to some extent) portable media players, and the content, personalities, and zealotry to put it all together. Sure, you could do the same thing years ago, and many did, but static-file, homebrew "Internet Radio" never really took off until the method got solidified into a simple, standardized flow, and got the "pass-it-on" mentality that made a lot of listeners into podcasters themselves.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    5. Re:ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      nearly anyone with half a brain can get a "write-mode" Internet presence that looks good.

      And as any LiveJournal/Xanga/Blogger/whatever user knows, while weblog authors can make it look good, most don't. Most seem to go out of their way to make seizure-inducing, flashing, malformed weblogs.

      I actually think there's some sort of ongoing contest for the most unreadable weblog design. That, or 90% of the internet population is blind. Or using lynx. ;)

    6. Re:ugh... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Blogs' improvement over webpages is that it's amazingly simple to build and maintain the page
      Which is to say that we suddenly have blogs now because someone finally figured out a good way to get an idiot-proof web-page package to the general population without making them learn anything about the technology they're using... again...
      meaning that nearly anyone with half a brain can get a "write-mode" Internet presence that looks good.
      You say this like it's a good thing. No wonder blogs are becoming a snicker almost as quickly as a buzzword.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    7. Re:ugh... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      It might be good... it might be bad... but it's not as trivial as everyone makes it out to be.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  5. Oh... BINGEing by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

    My dictionary lists "binging" as an acceptable spelling, but it took me a couple of extra parses on this (not least because "gorges" can be a noun as well as a verb.)

    I still don't, ya know, CARE, but at least I understand the headline.

  6. Wasted man-hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine if all this man-power was instead used to bring clean water to starving children.

    1. Re:Wasted man-hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine if all the man-power being used to complain about people not bringing clean water to starving children was instead used to bring clean food to thirsty children.

    2. Re:Wasted man-hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them eat cake.

    3. Re:Wasted man-hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not bring food to starving children and leave the water to those who are thirsty...

      And what about women bloggers? the 1800's called they want their man-centric sayings back.

    4. Re:Wasted man-hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because then those starving children might grow up, reproduce, and generate more starving children, hence aggravating the problem. Not so with clean water.

      And about your second point, nothing prevents a woman from measuring her work in man-hour units. She can also measure her feet in centimeters if she wants.

    5. Re:Wasted man-hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then they'd be full, but still thirsty

  7. Crabby Old Guy -- no blog by putko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm a crabby old guy resistant to jargon.

    The word "blogs", esp. blogger (and all derived words) have rubbed me the wrong way from the beginning -- especially when we have words like "write" and "writer."

    Thankfully, I've found this guy who really says it all better than I can.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Crabby Old Guy -- no blog by russellh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thankfully, I've found this guy who really says it all better than I can.

      It's good you don't feel the need to devote that kind of time and energy to harmless things you don't like... otherwise you'd be mistaken for a loser.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:Crabby Old Guy -- no blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just have issues with the title "Blog Binging Gorges the Net." I'm in the middle of a Harry Potter book, and I first parsed that sentence as having zero verbs!

    3. Re:Crabby Old Guy -- no blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author of the article you link to is probably just pissed because a) he doesn't know how to spell, and b) he has a tiny monitor. I have a personal blog, and it's not written on a column as wide as a receipt, unless you're running 640x480, in which case my page probably isn't the first you've encountered as undesirable (although I do try to accomodate those who are using a different environemnt than I am). Further more, when I post blog entries I assume are (hopefully) interesting to those who visit my site. I roughly know the type of person (friends or not) who visit my site, and I strive to post things that are interesting to us. Many of them may not be, but then again, they do have the right to ignore it.

    4. Re:Crabby Old Guy -- no blog by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      That link is nice, so I wrote a short summary of it.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    5. Re:Crabby Old Guy -- no blog by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      It's Maddox. His goal is to be incredibly overthetoply offensive. Read his FAQ, he explains this.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  8. It's the same with websites, but do I complain? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most blogs are created by someone you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'blogging' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon.
    It's the same with websites. What's the problem? The freedom of speech can't be the sole domain of those with something interesting to say.
    --
    News for merdes. Shit that matters.
    Ask me about my sig.
    1. Re:It's the same with websites, but do I complain? by daniil · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the ones most vocally demanding freedom of speech are usually the ones with nothing interesting to say.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    2. Re:It's the same with websites, but do I complain? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Freedom of Speech isn't The Right to Have Someone Who Would Listen. Those people you've mentioned, I've not run into them, and I don't see how they could be a problem anyhow. Don't you prefer them preaching to their monitor to them shouting in the streets? Sure, the first hundred times or so it's hilarious to see them lynched, but after that, it's just more traffic.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
  9. A blog is a webpage with management tools by popo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Can we stop calling them "blogs" now?


    Apparently if I create a web page and upload some text to it, that's not a blog. But if I use an idiot proof content-management system to "type" my web page instead of "coding" it, I'm then creating a blog.


    Once you start putting pictures and links on your blog, you're making a webpage...

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Personally, I hate the word "blog", I think it just sounds silly, especially when it's inserted into compound words.

      But really, I don't think the definition of a weblog really hinges on what sort of technologies you use to make it.

      I code my homepage completely by hand. There is a section of it that I consider a weblog, and yes, sometimes it includes pictures. I call it a weblog because it is continually updated with new content, which is displayed in a chronological fashion. It's really that simple. The organization of content is what makes it a weblog, not how the content got there.

      My content-management system involves adding a new row to the database using phpMyAdmin. If I just had one big HTML file that I considered my blog, and I did updates by adding more html then uploading again, that'd be ok too. CMS' are really common for weblogs because most people don't want to bother learning HTML or SFTP or any of that. They're just doing it the easiest way they can find. But that's alright.

      Taking this discussion further for no good reason, I don't know if I really make "webpages" anymore. A "web page" to me, at least, denotes a more static file, that I create from start to finish, upload, and then it just sits there waiting to be requested. Most of my website now is a series of scripts that reference each other and pull information from databases. I've got a website, without making any individual "web pages." This is nothing more than a semantics argument though, so who really cares?

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A webpage with management tools? That's taking the lowest common denominator.

      You might as well call forums, chat, galleries, content management systems, and everything else on the web "webpages with management tools."

      All of these differ in how the content is presented, the nature of that content, and how it's consumed. Forums are meant for a broad arrange of topics. Threads are meant for easy online conversation but not really meant for real time.

      Chat is for real time, but not easy to go back and view previous comments. Galleries are primarily for images. Knowledge management is usually primarily for read-only with some user feedback, but content that rarely changes.

      A blog is for content that changes approximately once a day/week. It's mostly read-only (with a few comments) and not made for easy, real-time interaction. It's also typically consumed through feeds.

      I see a difference here.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    3. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by m50d · · Score: 1
      Can we stop calling them "blogs" now?

      Oh, because saying "website-running-a-CMS" is /so/ much easier than saying "blog".

      I don't like blogs, but they're a distinct type of site, and it's easier to give them their own term. It's not like the word was being used for anything else.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I think there's a difference between blogs and other webpages: a blog is basically a web journal, it's updated more or less regularly. For example my personal website has a journal section, but one could well exist without the other. Back when I started the journal, people didn't use the word blog, they just had web diaries etc.

      The blogging craze seems to involve sites that consists of nothing but the journal. People are using the blog as their personal website, with little or no static content. I think this is a good thing, because it takes more effort to write real websites, and those sites will hopefully stand out against the noise floor of blogs.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by legirons · · Score: 1

      "A blog is a webpage with management tools - Can we stop calling them "blogs" now?"

      But then what would we call the webmanagementosphere?

    6. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by wolenczak · · Score: 1

      Then you have to love the word blob

    7. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by hostyle · · Score: 0

      I dunno WRAC sounds good to me. "Dude! Your blog^Hwebsite is a WRAC (wreck)" - fair enough, it probably IS just me.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    8. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by Psx29 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say blogs are mostly read only, look at slashdot...

    9. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by c64k · · Score: 1

      it takes more effort to write real websites, and those sites will hopefully stand out against the noise floor of blogs.

      presentation without content is fluff.

      Yeah, lots of blogs are seemingly without content, but a whole lot aren't. I don't give a high flying crap about how nice a website you have, or if you're blog is pretty. If you have content that is of interest to me, and it's regularly updated, I'm gonna be checking it out regularly whether you call it a blog, a web journal, my homepage, or whatever.

      real websites! What the hell is a real website?

      --
      CIA Industries - Running the world for fun and profit
    10. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really classify Slashdot as a blog. While you have a single-threaded story/blog entry type of publishing, the commenting system is an order of magnitude more complex than what you would find on a typical blog. A typical blog only allows single-threaded responses to the original story. Slashdot allows comments as responses to other comments. It adds a whole other dimension of interactivity.

      Even with this additional dimension I would humbly say that it's not really the optimal form of interactivity. Nay -- let me rephrase that. It lends itself to a certain style of commenting and itneractivity. All old posts typically get moved to the bottom, and the more popular a topic is the more likely you won't read down to the bottom posts. It's very transient.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    11. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      LiveJournal allows threading/replying to other comments. I find it a bit odd that the definition of "blog" should hinge on how advanced the commenting system is - and furthermore, I'd say that if anything, a decent comment system is argument in favour of being a blog, not against (eg, consider the extreme - a webpage with no comments ability at all is something I'd be less likely to consider a "blog").

    12. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1
      I've never used LiveJournal so that's interesting to hear. I wouldn't say that a blog necessarily hinges on the commenting system. I am saying that, in general, categorization is based on functionality.

      So maybe Slashdot is a blog. I think I was hinting towards that when I mentioned that the threading/commenting style of Slashdot is not optimal for small group interactivity. That's what I meant by read-only. I didn't mean it in the strictest sense, but sort of loosely. I also said this in the context of comparing it to chat or forums where the core functionality is interactive, read-write chat/replying.

      Chat is for real time, but not easy to go back and view previous comments. Galleries are primarily for images. Knowledge management is usually primarily for read-only with some user feedback, but content that rarely changes. A blog is for content that changes approximately once a day/week. It's mostly read-only (with a few comments) and not made for easy, real-time interaction. It's also typically consumed through feeds.
      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    13. Re:A blog is a webpage with management tools by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Can we stop calling them "blogs" now?

      I don't personally have any problems with words "blog" and "weblog". That in itself is a good distinctive word for this kind of sites, even if you're not speaking generally of "news sites" or "online journals" or anything. I might describe last.fm a "music charts system with tagging and weblog features" and not even blink.

      The derivant words drive me crazy though. I'm a blogger but if you call me a "multi-blogger" or something, I might get violent. =)

      But if I use an idiot proof content-management system to "type" my web page instead of "coding" it, I'm then creating a blog.

      Nope. A weblog is a type of a site. CMSes just happen to be the most convenient way of managing them.

      I was writing my first "Blog by a Clueless Teenager Geek"-type of site in 1998 in raw HTML with nothing but emacs in my side, it just happens to be hell to maintain =)

      Once you start putting pictures and links on your blog, you're making a webpage...

      Umm, what is exactly wrong with adding pictures and links to blogs - just using the web technologies as it's meant to be used? And in case you didn't notice, "weblog" originally meant just that: people linking to sites and pages they've found. Hell, these days, people write blogs that do nothing but link to some article (in another blog or elsewhere) and say "hey, my thoughts exactly". Hell, Slashdot is a blog that does usually nothing but link.

  10. Re:Oh... BINGEing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I still don't, ya know, CARE, but at least I understand the headline.

    Good for you. That's super. You are a very special person.

  11. recursive blogging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, since Slashdot is, technically, a blog, have we just witnessed the advent of a blog about a blog about a blog? I hope there's a base-case. :P

    1. Re:recursive blogging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is not a blog, you dumb cockholster.

  12. Why don't we start with YOUR man-hours? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heed your own advice, buddy.

    --
    News for merdes. Shit that matters.
    Ask me about my sig.
    1. Re:Why don't we start with YOUR man-hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuesday September 27 2005, the day Elad Alon suggested to an AC to feed starving children with WATER. I hope people you know will notice and make fun of you in the weeks to come.

    2. Re:Why don't we start with YOUR man-hours? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Oops, I didn't notice his mistake.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    3. Re:Why don't we start with YOUR man-hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What mistake? He just asked to imagine something. Like I can say "imagine if we painted all the highways pink". There's nothing wrong with imagination. You're the one who stepped in and asked to actually do it.

    4. Re:Why don't we start with YOUR man-hours? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Do we know each other?

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
  13. Blog measurements hard in general. by burtonator · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's really hard to measure blogs from a number of angles. Everyone always claims that your data is biased and there's still debate over what a 'blog' actually is... Feedburner is in a good place to measure blogs. I blogged about their stats last week.

    There's also a lot of debate on the quality of various Blog search engines such as Technorati, Feedster, and IceRocket. I'm thinking of creating a meta indexer which simply monitors 100 real blogs at 1-5 minute intervals and then determines how quickly the blog search engines index them.

    I'd love help if anyone's interested. I just don't have much time......

  14. Tasteless drivel by camt · · Score: 1

    The proxy at work blocks that site as "Tasteless". I'll just have to pretend I read TFA.

    1. Re:Tasteless drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are referring to Websense, it is not a proxy.

  15. Thanks to Geeks/Nerds by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 2

    Ten years ago, people called blogs homepages.

    "Blogs" are in reality just easy-to-setup homepages. Without the geeks/nerds making it easy for people to set things up with sites like Blogger.com, blogs wouldn't be as popular as it is today. Many bloggers today can't even write a line of HTML.

    1. Re:Thanks to Geeks/Nerds by yotto · · Score: 1

      Many bloggers today can't even write a line of HTML.

      Hell, many bloggers today can't even write a line of English!

    2. Re:Thanks to Geeks/Nerds by SpaceAdmiral · · Score: 0, Troll

      I disagree. I wrote my own blog system in PHP, my pages are all valid XHTML, and I manually insert my entires into MySQL. I can certainly write HTML and it was hardly an "easy-to-setup-homepage". . .

      The reason it's a blog? Because it's updated often, sorted chronologically, and, unlike a forum, only allows me to post entries on it (although readers can submit comments about entries).

    3. Re:Thanks to Geeks/Nerds by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 1

      I said "many", not "all". Compared to the hundreds of blogs being created each day, yours is in the minority.

  16. Not a blog by adamwright · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I maintain a site run via WordPress, that publishes an RSS feed. However, I don't use it to write about my (uninteresting to most of the universe) day to day life. Rather, I write semi-technical articles about subjects people might be interested in.

    No doubt this is lumped in with the "blogs". However, it's just an extension of what I've done for years, but now I don't have to write static HTML pages and FTP them around. I using weblog software as a content management system and RSS to let people know when I've "published" something. Comments on the system allow me to get feedback and questions that everyone can see, rather than have me privately answer the same thing 10 times from my Inbox.

    I would state that this categorically isn't a "blog", just a more useful incarnation of what people have been putting on the web for years. I'm pretty sure many other "blogs" are like mine (heck, looking at my RSS list, 99% will be better).

    The internet has always been full of garbage (or, more PC'ly, "stuff I'm not interested in"). Just ignore it if you don't like it, and focus on the stuff you do like.

    1. Re:Not a blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The content doesn't have to be useless for it to be blog. A blog is something where you can post messages, people can leave comments, people can write blogs in response to your blogs (trackback), and sometimes use a notification system like RSS.

      Don't shy away from the term "blog" just because there's a lot of useless ones out there. I read many technical blogs that have useful information, and have one of my own.

      It's the new form of web pages, but also its the merging of a messaging system into it. It is a replacement for e-mail and message boards for me. I tend to write long rambling messages (though usually informative and rarely about my personal life) that I don't know who cares about, so its better to publish it in a place where people can opt-in to it if they want to.

    2. Re:Not a blog by Evil+Grinn · · Score: 1

      I would state that this categorically isn't a "blog", just a more useful incarnation of what people have been putting on the web for years. I'm pretty sure many other "blogs" are like mine (heck, looking at my RSS list, 99% will be better).

      You just described almost all the "blogs" that I read. Except for my (real life) friends, I don't read blogs about people's personal lives or even political opinions. I read dozens of blogs about programming, security, etc, and I call them blogs because there's no other word for it. To call them "websites" is too general.

    3. Re:Not a blog by adamwright · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the term "blog" has become corrupted via the vast tracts of 14 year olds talking about their teen angst (at least to me, and many I speak to). They're welcome to the term - I've never much liked the fad that something's not popular until someone gives it a stupid sounding name (AJAX anyone?).

      The terminological tainting is, sadly, very common and is something I've come to accept. I can't call myself a "hacker" anymore without getting into a semantic argument. I've not got the energy to keep correcting people, so I mostly now just steer clear of the whole thing and use more formal terms.

      (Also, your comment was interesting, yet hid below my threshold because you posted AC. Login and participate properly! :)

    4. Re:Not a blog by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I would contend that it is a blog. It's a log that's put on the web right?

      I don't think blog's are necessarily journals or online diaries, like many people use them for. It's also a way of distributing information that's temporal in nature and which is typically subscribed by other people. I think this differs from other content in that it is structurally meant to be consumed as a single stream on a daily/weekly basis. It has snippets of content easy for consumption.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    5. Re:Not a blog by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      I would state that this categorically isn't a "blog"

      Sorry, it is. Your site shows all the hallmarks of being a weblog - periodic publishing of original articles on a personal homepage, allowing comments, using weblog software, providing feeds, using timestamps, permalinks, categories... by any reasonable definition you have a weblog. Just because you did it manually before weblogging became popular, it doesn't mean you haven't been weblogging all along. It just means the rest of the world caught up with you and wrote software like Wordpress to make it easier.

      You've just fallen for the propoganda that a few whiners propogate which labels all weblogs as uninteresting, adolescent navel-gazing. That's not true, and your site is a perfect counterexample.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    6. Re:Not a blog by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing.

      To justify and promote blogs (by the companies that have a specific promotional or monetary interest in such things), a lot of people will convince you that anything accepting comments and providing updated contents over time is a "blog" and not just a "website". By that yardstick, most online news outlets (including the corporate broadcasters and print news groups) are a "blog", since they fit the updates bill as well as accepting comments in one way or another, usually related to the contents -- and even offer RSS feeds.

      A better definition is:

      Blog: A website by me. About me and things I have to say. Intended not just to present myself and share information, but to generate a "community" around my every words and regular updates. Frequently mimics the current content of a million others blogs and frequently engaging in deep-level navel-gazing (trackbacks - a blog linking to a blog linking to a blog linking to a website linking to a story).

      Indeed, the word "blog" comes from "web log". Log, as in journal.

      Websites: Everything else.

      Or, as an example:

      JWZ has a blog (livejournal, actually). Slashdot has a geek oriented news site that accepts user comments.

      JWZ's site is about himself, his business, his thoughts, his interesting link finds, his takes on news stories and people wanting to participate in his blog because he's him. Or him's he. Or whatever.

      Slashdot is about content and people commenting on that content. The stories are about real stories or products or technologies - not about Hemos or Nate or Taco. The comments are by users, not Hemos or Nate or Taco. At most, the editor who approves a story may add a somewhat biased personal comment to a story, but it is still about the story and not that individual.

      I don't know how much clearer the contrast can be.

      Here's another example. Wil Wheaton has a blog. Debian planet has a website. Wil Wheaton's blog is about him, his life, his career, his thoughts and people commenting in relation. Debianplanet.org is about Debian news, updates and howtos, with user comments and a community. But not about an individual or an individual's thoughts or life.

    7. Re:Not a blog by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, I'd say a big difference is how you use them. Taking you Slashdot example, Slashdot is used for threading based on stories. This is very much how blog works. Instead of stories you have blog entries. I think the main difference is the commenting structure. Blogs are meant for single-threaded comments, not optimized for commenting. Slashdot's commenting system is orders above what I've ever seen on a blog.

      To me, it has more to do with structure than content. Slashdot comes very close to just being a blog for the geek community (not any one person) that revolves around articles, book reviews, interviews, etc.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    8. Re:Not a blog by BruceCage · · Score: 1

      According to "Why I Hate Personal Weblogs" your weblog might not be totally useless! It might actually belong in a useful category, such as 'Expert in a Field'.

      This 'essay' is actually quite an interesting read since it brings up a lot of valid distinctions between the different types of weblogs.

      --
      Perfect is the enemy of done.
  17. Details of my blog by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    I agree it is hard to count blogs....please see my blog for more information.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  18. Sweeping generalizations by dr.badass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Most blogs are created by someone you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'blogging' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon.

    Most web pages, emails, usenet posts, instant messages, SMSes, books, magazines, newspapers, pamphlets, and indeed, spoken words are created by people I don't know, often about things I don't care about, and that hasn't stopped any of them from becoming remarkably ubiquitous.

    I don't understand why people think blogging is different from any of the above.

    It looks like everyone wants their fifteen minutes of fame online.

    That's a crass assumption. Most do it because they enjoy doing it. Some do it because they want to make money. Some do it because all of their friends are doing it. People have a lot of different reasons. I seriously doubt that "fame", even fifteen minutes of it on the web, is a real motivator for all but a tiny but vocal minority.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    1. Re:Sweeping generalizations by hendridm · · Score: 1

      I agree. I might now care about what 99.9% of the average blogger has to comment on, but it's when I'm searching for a useful reference that a hit on a blog via Google has come in handy. I can't count the number of times I've searched for something obscure only to find a blog hit via Google that has lead me to what I'm looking for. Most of it may be obscure, but sometimes I'm looking for that.

    2. Re:Sweeping generalizations by cheshire_cqx · · Score: 1

      I agree. Also, who says vapid mass-media outlets are the way to go? Cerainly there are a large number of shallow, annoying blogs. Then again, there are a large number of shallow, annoying people.

      I continue to be impressed, however, by the number of interesting people who write online journals about all kinds of things. Just because you aren't interested in X doesn't mean no one is.

      Also, there's something to be said for the act of writing itself. Writing well is difficult—it forces you to think. Writing about something helps you learn.

      I will concede that the word “blog” is ugly.

  19. blog = unwise fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Blogging to me is like writing a public diary... Why ?? Why post your thoughts to have the world scrutinize ? Concider the following. your not the smartest person in the world, so you go ahead and publicize said fact by advertising your inept thoughts to the world, so your boss, mate, motherinlaw, stalker can read it. I'm not being a troll just being a realist. I've actually read the blog of potential employees ( yahoo e-mail on resume => 360.yahoo.com/blah) and decided not to hire them when I saw just how lacking of sensible thought they were.

  20. People connect computers to the internet by g0at · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, water is wet. Food satisfies hunger.

    Can we have more of these content-free statements of the blindingly obvious, please?

    Slashdot subscribers, please stand up so that I can laugh at you.

    -b

    1. Re:People connect computers to the internet by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Can we have more of these content-free statements of the blindingly obvious, please?

      Sure. Just visit any blog!

      (a joke from a guy who doesn't 'get' the anti-blog backlash)

  21. Re:Oh... BINGEing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It was a typo. It should have read "Blog Bling Gizzorges tha 'netz"

  22. Re:Blogs are so passe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah. "Blogging to be cool" is an oxymoron anyway. Blogging is what nerds do to communicate.

    Hasn't anyone noticed that many blogs function almost exactly the same way BBS forums did, back in the dial-up days?

  23. Drinking game by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

    Sheesh, you could play a drinking game with that summary. One swig per mention of the word 'blog'. Lets see who passes out first shall we?

    1. Re:Drinking game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 swigs?

      Lightweight!

  24. Someone coined the term - Blogorrhea by melted · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I, for one, would like to wholeheartedly agree with the underlying meaning of it. :-)

  25. Not everyone is looking for fame by Rick+Genter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a weblog. I don't use it to look for fame; I use it to communicate experiences with friends and family, with the added feature that others who want information about what it's like to have these experiences may read my weblog to do so.

    I find it a lot more effective than getting on the phone with various family members and friends in different time zones and repeating the same stories over and over again. It allows those who are interested to find out what's going on when they want to, and allows me to communicate any updates when I want to.

    And I agree, the word "blog" is annoying, and, as far as I can tell, purely a media construct. Back in the day, when I was doing game development, I used to post a monthly development log on progress on the game. (Unforutnately, it's been lost to the mists of time - even the Wayback Machine can't get to it :-(.) We called it "a development log." Why do new words have to be invented for something, especially when they are just the lazy contraction of existing words that work perfectly well?

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    1. Re:Not everyone is looking for fame by miller60 · · Score: 1
      Studies of LiveJournal find that most of these sites are used for personal communications, to share stuff with a small circle of friends and family. Sure, it's easy to poke fun at the stereotype of here's-what-my-cat-did-today blogs penned by teenage girls, but major blog tools are adapting to reflect the priorities of this style of blogging/journaling.

      Look at Six Apart's next-generation blogging tool, Project Comet. It emphasizes not only sharing, but also ways to limit access to a small group.

    2. Re:Not everyone is looking for fame by Kelson · · Score: 1
      Why do new words have to be invented for something, especially when they are just the lazy contraction of existing words that work perfectly well?


      I don't know. Why couldn't we just use the original words? It's just something that happens a lot on the internet.
    3. Re:Not everyone is looking for fame by cobras2 · · Score: 1

      >Why do new words have to be invented for something, especially when they are just the lazy contraction of existing words that work perfectly well?

      Umm.. that's how English works.
      Blogs are something that is fairly easy to identify, to the exclusion of anything else, so why not have a word dedicated specifically to it?
      Why do we call cars cars instead of "motorized carriages"? That's how they started off.. then they shortened it to "motor cars" and now we usually just call them "cars". But, it works, and nobody complains about it.
      Why complain about "blog" if you don't complain about "car" ? :)

      --
      Early bird may get the worm.. but the second mouse gets the cheese.
  26. But that's the point by slapout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    often about something you don't care about

    But that's the point. You ignore those, I read the ones that talk about things you are interested in.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  27. A new lease on...ZZZZZZZZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's the same with websites. What's the problem? The freedom of speech can't be the sole domain of those with something interesting to say."

    *The chronically dull rejoice!*

    1. Re:A new lease on...ZZZZZZZZ! by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      You're a closet dull-er, but you'll come around. You'll learn to appericiate the wonders of

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    2. Re:A new lease on...ZZZZZZZZ! by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I feel asleep midsentence. (Actually, I forgot putting "the writer fell asleep etc." inside triangular brackets would cause it to be regarded as an HTML tag. Don't let this happen to you.)

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
  28. webpage for dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why all the blog envy? We all did the same thing back in the day making webpages, link sharing and persistence against local re-installs where your shit is still there. Ppl just want a voice and they're tired of media filling that gap all generic like and catering to the vocal minority. Individualism or something - blogs about cats and stuff, yeah they're boring and wasteful but that's just what we've become. Deal with it, right, one day blogs will will be better?

    1. Re:webpage for dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We all did the same thing back in the day making webpages

      you may have played with your "personal webpage" creation crapola program and made some vanity pages that had seriously crap colour schemes and flashing text... but a heck of a lot of us had a life instead...

      face it... 99.999% of ALL blogs and personal websites are pure, unaldulterated crap...

  29. Am I alone? by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Like several other people have stated, I don't really get the definition of a blog other than "an easy to use, idiot proof homepage".

    I don't have anything against blogs but.... I don't have one and I don't read any. I know there are some useful blogs out there, but when I hear blog I still think of pimply-emo-kid-greg complaining about his mom not paying for his sex change operation.

    1. Re:Am I alone? by m50d · · Score: 1
      Like several other people have stated, I don't really get the definition of a blog other than "an easy to use, idiot proof homepage".

      It's usually time-dependent. A normal website, though updated, has pages which could basically have been written at any time, and it's not obvious in which order the site was done. A blog normally has entries tied to specific dates, and a clear order for the pages.

      --
      I am trolling
  30. Re:Blogs are so passe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic!!! wtf...

  31. You know, I'd spend time ripping on blogs... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 0, Redundant

    But Maddox already did such a great job for me. http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=ba nish

    Seriously, the rise of blogs isn't really waht pisses me off, they are just personal websites basically. Nothing wrong with a personal website, I have one myself. Granted most blogs are really STUPID personal websites, but hey whatever. What pisses me off are all these "experts" who get all hot and bothered over blogs, liek it's something special. No it's not, it's a bunch of people standing on their little soap box. Humans love to talk, this is nothing new. Blogs are just their way of trying to reach a global audience, usually with very limited success.

    Get over it.

  32. Why I love blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they give people who like to bullshit a soapbox to stand on, without the possibility that they will ever be heard by anyone who matters/cares.

  33. No need to be so cynical! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, the submitter seems to think that blogs are worthless, yet it's a huge phenomenon, and seems puzzled as to why. I've seen this attitude before--it's common on Slashdot--but it's misguided. A weblog is simply someone posting their thoughts on a topic that interests them. It could be links to other sites, it could be software development, it could be graphic arts, it could be TV commercials, it could simply be what appear to be mundane details about daily life. The key is that you ignore what you don't care about. The mundane detail blogs are intended for family and friends (but could still be read by anyone who might want to). The graphic arts blogs are likely only of interest to other graphic artists. Slashdot-types might like software development blogs, Linux advocacy blogs, OS X blogs, and so on. There's no need to be cynical just because other people are writing about topics you have no interest in.

    1. Re:No need to be so cynical! by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      There's no need to be cynical just because other people are writing about topics you have no interest in.
      I think the reason many people are cynical is because so many bloggers seem to write about either A.) topics that nobody (save, perhaps, the blogger) should have any interest in; or B.) topics the blogger doesn't actually seem to know anything about.

      It's the same cynicism that causes us to ask exactly why someone would want to go on Jerry Springer and tell the world about his relationship with his sister. There is such a thing as bad publicity.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:No need to be so cynical! by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      yet it's a huge phenomenon

      No, it isn't. More than 99% of internet users don't have blogs, yet the tiny minority who do get an inordinate amount of press time - much like PETA in that regard. The only "phenomenon" here is that the press seems to have an orgasm every time they get to use the word "blog" on TV or in a news article.

      The fact that anyone who cares can write a web page without knowing HTML is hardly something to get worked up over. Just another form of noise, is all.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    3. Re:No need to be so cynical! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. More than 99% of internet users don't have blogs, yet the tiny minority who do get an inordinate amount of press time - much like PETA in that regard.

      More than 99% of internet users don't have websites either, so I guess websites are fad?

  34. Do blogs really pollute the Internet? Come on, now by amrust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are people so worried about blogs corrupting the Internet, anyway? I don't understand the problem. If Google happens to turn up my blog in a search for something, and my listing is distracting people from finding "reputable sources", then how reputable could said sources really be? I mean, if someone's silly blog like mine has a higher pagerank than someone's site, then I feel like the problem is theirs, not mine. Seriously. You probably need to work on your site content, if a lowly personal blog can get listings ahead of yours.

    And I speak of myself as an example only as example. Because I know full well my blog doesn't threaten the Internet in any way. There's more traffic in a ghost town. Mine is little more than a gripe-list, and way for my family to see I'm still alive without needing to call me.

    If you hate blogs, then don't read them. But why do so many people feel they are polluting the WWW?

    --
    VOTE!
  35. MOD PARENT INFORMATIVE! (example blog entry :P by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmmm, posted the parent post, and immediately got modded "overrated", which is pretty fscking funny, since the post had not been rated. What fucktard ...... blahblahblah .... I'm sure a post like this'll assure no more points for long time to come.
    [/rant]


    And this was a perfect example of what you'll usually find in a blog - which is my reason for asking to mod it informative. As for this post, you can mod it funny if you want, since my whole point is a joke in itself. Thank you :)

  36. Yeah, and what's with this "internet" thing? by scovetta · · Score: 0

    How are blogs any different from "personal web pages" (remember "home pages"?) I just wish they'd get better WYSIWYG editing and image uploading (no, I do not want to use Hello or imageshack-- I just want to drag and drop, or at worse, click Browse...) I do agree however, that the sheer number of blogs is a bit rediculous.

    Google should think up a way to segregate the opinion-oriented blogs from the actual informative websites out there. The danger is that genuinely useful websites will be drowned out in whiney teenagers complaining about how much they hate everyone else. Or something, I don't read blogs much. Neither should you.

    [offtopic]
    Ideally, I'd want to see Microsoft FrontPage-like functionality totally within a web page. (Ahem, Bill, can you hear me?) Anyone know any open-source products that do website editing online?
    [/offtopic]

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  37. Until It Reaches 6.45 Billion Blogs by Sundroid · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to Wikipedia, the world population as of 6/2005 is 6.45 billion. The democratic nature of blogging indicates that it is possible some day every single person on earth will have at least one blog, so the blog counting is unlikely to stop until it reaches 6.45 billion, that is, if some day all nations become democratic.

    The "relevance" and "importance" issues mentioned by the Wall Street Journal article miss the point -- blogging is all about democracy and free speech. The human desire to self-express is unstoppable.

    1. Re:Until It Reaches 6.45 Billion Blogs by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      thanks to blogspot and its ilk, anybody and his 3-year-old sister can put up a weblog. consequence is that I have about 6 of them, each for a different area of interest that I pursue. so your estimated ceiling of the earth's population is potentially an UNDERestimate.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  38. Re:Crabby Old Guy needs a mirror by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1

    Funny site. Guy goes off on blog'ish rant about how fugly blogs are, on his own ridiculously fugly blog page. Without apparent irony.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  39. so what by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    yes, there are millions of pages of home made web flatulence...I have a few of my own. This is a transitional condition which the backbones and the ISPs should take as a warning that they need to beef up capacity. Some REAL bandwidth pigs already exist: voip, torrents of movies and audio etc. These are just the beginning of an era when everybody with a connection will have an abiding internet presence which will come to do for them on the internet what their physical presence does for them in their neighborhood and town: it will be the "place and the face" by which most of the world knows and contacts them. Get used to it. [and maybe, kinda like house taxes, we should be paying for the infrastructure directly so the bandwidth will be there even after everybody is using VOIP and streaming packet video of everything they might want to watch to every device they might want to watch it on...hiding the infrastructure costs in the ISP fees and cable fees may break down when "bandwidth too cheap to meter" is saturated]
    And so what if you don't know or care about most of the bloggers and their topics? You don't know or care about most of the people on this planet as it stands now so what's new here? You found the people you like some how or other and you meet them when it suits you. Bloggers have been doing the same for years with blogrolling, Technorati and other affiliation-discovery mechanisms and the 99.99% they have no use for, well, they just don't go to that corner of the World Wide block party.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  40. Who said that software patents are bad for Linux? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
  41. How many Private Blogs by hhr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be interesting to know how many people don't blog for fame-- blogging for personal or practicle reasons. Quite honestly, a blog is often better than a notebook. You can update your blog from any computer. Blogs are hard to lose. They don't fall apart after months of use. And you can read a blog anywhere on the internet.

    I have four personal blogs just for that reason-- a wine blog because I have problems remember that great wine I had last year, a photo blog because it's easier to blog photos than it is to email them to friends, a house maintenance blog because damned if I can remember the last time I replaced the furnance filters, and a generic personal blog.

    I don't consider this "blog spam" I don't hype or advertise them. Yes they are public, but it's easier to have a public blog, than a private blog for a dozen or so people. And, they are just so damn convienent.

    1. Re:How many Private Blogs by rthille · · Score: 1

      Interesting, you use a 'blog' as a calendar to remind you of what you did when. I use 'iCal' for things like the furnace or even 'the last time I mowed the lawn' (I swear it grows 3 times as fast as the neighbors, or I'm missing weeks of time out of my life :-). The wine blog might be interesting to me if I were more into wine, but for just remembering which things I liked I'd probably use a text file in my 'Olio' directory. The Photo blog would be good, but I'm too lazy. I've just got some scripts that dump every picture from my digital camera into folders, 100 per, and put up pages of thumbnails. Actually putting some effort into it might be better :-) I'll get to that RSN...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  42. Why blogs piss me off so much... by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hmm, I hope this isn't too bloggish, but heres the #1 reason blogs piss me off.

    My corporate firewall blocks anything slightly resembling a blog or higher.

    Now that doesn't piss me off because I can't go read a bunch of morons thoughts on things that don't concern me, that pisses me off because normal people, who write articles about things that do concern me (day-to-day programming solutions/concepts) are switching over in droves to "blogging" their articles and ideas. So when I google about a particular c# or java problem I am having, and out of the top 10 results on the page 7 of them are posted to some damn blog site or in blog format, my #*$&#*$& corporate firewall won't let me get to the article.

    What is wrong with a good old fashion article on a web page explaining how to get some new programming concept hammered out????

    I'm out (from the Almost-a-blog-department)

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:Why blogs piss me off so much... by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      This sounds less like a problem with blogs than it is a problem with your firewall. With stupid policies like that, why does your sysadmin bother letting you connect to port 80 at all?

    2. Re:Why blogs piss me off so much... by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 1
      sssshhhhhhhhhhh!!!

      what are you crazy man? He/she may be monitoring me right now! I will get the extreme sweats/jitters if I can't get to slashdot you insensitive clod!

      On a more serious note, I work for a very large financial institution, and our sysadmin(s) are just cowtowing to corporate policy... I simply wanted to point out why I dislike the blog fever that exists these days, I'm not saying blogs are good or bad, just that they affect me negatively while at work, and dammit it's ALL ABOUT ME. /sarcasm

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    3. Re:Why blogs piss me off so much... by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      LOL... tell us the name of your company so I can be sure to invest somewhere where they do not beat down their employees! ;-)

  43. 90% of everything is spam by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Most science fiction and fantasy fiction sucks goat balls. But I still occasionally find a book that transcends genre and blows my mind.

    TV is a vast wasteland of crap, with a few great exceptions like Galactica and Six Feet Under.

    The blogosphere is full of nonsense, self-referential mental masturbation, and useless blogrolls. Then there are blogs like Daring Fireball, The Long Tail, and WWDNK which are each compelling in their own way.

    Spam, though, is 100% crap. In that 10% lies the difference.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:90% of everything is spam by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Most science fiction and fantasy fiction sucks goat balls.
      You say that like it's a bad thing...
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    2. Re:90% of everything is spam by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      You say that like it's a bad thing...

      Prank call! Prank call!

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  44. therapy by absolutlactam · · Score: 0

    Therapists are now suggesting blogs as a replacement for the classic journal, since they can be searched far easier and could be shared, like discussion groups. Would GrokLaw count as a blog about law? Offtopic: what about patenting the use of blogs in mental patients?

  45. Nice Title (not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess what they meant to say was "Blog Binging Engorges the Net"? As in bloats it, makes it bigger?

    The term "editor" must mean different things 'round here...

  46. Use /. for advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be bored by people who became outraged at /. editors for screwing up this or that. But this particular occurence really is pretty pathetic.

    This 'news' was submitted by "site pixie". Oh look - he has a website! We can go there and then be derisive of him! Oh wait - site pixie isn't a person at all - it's a service that allows you to transcend inane blogdom with inane flash animations! A person who doesn't have anything to say is neither terrible nor uncommon. A person who has nothing to say and demands your attention while he says it, however, is offensive.

    This wasn't 'interesting' or 'news', but that's not a big deal.
    It was hypocritical and self-serving, and for those reasons it shouldn't have been posted.

  47. So they can be verbed by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

    Why do new words have to be invented for something, especially when they are just the lazy contraction of existing words that work perfectly well?

    So they can be made into verbs. Try these:

    "I'm going to post something on my development log"

    vs

    "I'm going to blog"

    Same meaning, but catchier.

    1. Re:So they can be verbed by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Catchier like Ebola, perhaps, but not in any good way.

    2. Re:So they can be verbed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm going to dlog" is even catchier.

      Maybe I'll talk about my dlog on my podcast and film the whole thing for my vlog.

  48. Blogs just suck. by DysenteryInTheRanks · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wish everyone who is writing a stupid blog, would stop. If we wanted to hear what you had to say, we would NOT have added the X factor to HTML (XHTML) and the C Secret Sauce (CSS) which is clearly intended for PROFESSIONAL WEB DESIGNErS, not you, stupid person, with your cats.

    Now for the tech diss. The blogger has no idea what he is doing. Tell me stupid blogger, what is a C struk? What is a PERL registered expression? WHO is Linux Torvalds? You do not know. Sadly. All you know is your cats, and maybe what you had for lunch, and how to link to your frends. Well, try getting a girl with THAT. Ha ha I laugh at you.

    Now sad bloggger. If you'll excuse me, I have to go back to better activities than thinking about you, such as reading Slashdot and making some karma that is actually WORTH something, not stupid PageRank for my BLOG. If you see me on the street (I am the one in the pimp ALL YOUR BASE tshirt) go the other way. Do not look. Do not linhger. Go home and write about your FEELings and live the mack programming to the /. crowd and see who wins the girls.

    Dys

    1. Re:Blogs just suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Tell me stupid blogger, what is a C struk? What is a PERL registered expression?

      Maybe you mean "C struct" and a "regular expression"...?

    2. Re:Blogs just suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus Torvalds, yes?

      *sigh*

      I'm not sure you know who he is.

    3. Re:Blogs just suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT

  49. ....other than slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is almost the ur-blog.

    e-quips (it was my confirmation word, so I neologised it)

  50. Re:Who said that software patents are bad for Linu by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    hmmm brings back a rather vivid memory of a recreational walk in the Falklands that went slightly wrong (was stationed there in 1983 at RAF Stanley). We were enjoying our walk when we came upon this fence... and facing away from us on this fence was a rusty sign "Perigas Minas"..."Danger Mines"... the next few hours were rather tricky getting the rest of the group out of that minefield...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  51. Shocking by eison · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other shocking news, millions of people keep diaries!

    HOLY COW who knew?

    Can we please get some "stuff that matters" now?

    --
    is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
  52. Because What We Think Is Important Enough To Publi by acomj · · Score: 1

    paul and storm (singing group) have a funny blog. "Because What We Think Is Important Enough To Publish". Its mainly to support there musical efforts with food and tv reviews..

    paul and strom

    But all parodies aside, blogs should be about something, not just narsicistic ramblings.

    http://auotoblog.com/ is quite good, especially during car shows.

  53. Not a new phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The term 'blog' may be new, but the concept is very, very old in computer terms. How is blogging any different from posting on a newsgroup or a pre-internet bulletin board? Oh yeah the web interface, that's right.

  54. Re:Oh... BINGEing by generic-man · · Score: 1

    That's good stuff. I think it needs to be blogged. (Or is that "blogued" in the Queen's English? TrackBack: No, it is not.)

    --
    For more information, click here.
  55. This is news? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    s/blog/web page/ in 1994. Now it's just that you have nontechnical people posting useless crap on web pages instead of only those who learned a little bit of HTML and how to ftp a page to their ISP's web server.

  56. Blogging by omarius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You make it sound as if most bloggers are wasting their own and everyone else's time. Sure, that's probably true, but what the hell, man? Don't you make your living off people you don't know providing free content for your blog here? If Bill Gates said something like, "Most OSS programs are created by someone you don't know, and often do something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'coding' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon. There are even programs about coding such as CVS. It looks like everyone wants their fifteen minutes of programming fame," it'd probably make you a little aggrivated, no? Have mercy on the 'upstarts,' o high and mighty Taco.

  57. Define blog by slapout · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....blog....a place where someone (sometimes several people) make entries about subjects that interest them.....and people usually make comments about the entries....I just realized something....Slashdot is a blog!!!

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  58. Blogs are by and large useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about other people, but for me the word 'blog' stands for disreputable load of crap published by some yahoo who probably has no idea what he/she is writing about, which manages to be even less reliable than mainstream media is already.

    The fact that CNN now has a blog segment makes me want to vomit.

    Personal blogs are even worse, as if you're so pretentious to think that anyone gives a crap what your mood is, or what flavour of ice cream you ate today.

    1. Re:Blogs are by and large useless. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The question is, does anyone care about some anonymous coward ranting on Slashdot?

  59. Re:This decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, "Redundant" -- the choice of people who don't know jack shit about moderating like grown-ups.

  60. Blogs are Websites to... by Blue_Nile · · Score: 1

    Most websites are created by someone you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'web publishing' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon. There are even websites about websites such as Google. It looks like everyone wants their fifteen minutes of fame online. Estimates put the number of websites to be in the tens of millions, with several factors influencing the count, such as whether a website is available for public or private consumption. Carl Bialik investigates the intricacies of counting websites, and shows how website indexing sites like Google and Delicious are bursting at the seams with thousands of new Website entries everyday.

    --
    Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
  61. It's not a blog by ndogg · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hate euphemisms.

    Let's stop calling these things blogs (a word which was probably invented by a corporate whore with too much time on his hands), and start calling them what they have always been called. It's a f*cking journal that's readable by the public.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:It's not a blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That's way easier to say.

    2. Re:It's not a blog by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      And the newly-created word for an online journal that is readable by the public is blog!

      Reminds me of the time my sister came home from school and started arguing with my dad that weight doesn't exist. That it's really just gravity attracting the mass of an object. She went on about this for 5 minutes explaining it all and concluded by restating that there is no such thing as weight: there is only mass and gravity.

      My dad responded "And that's what we call weight."

      And, like my sister, you're arguing that we shouldn't use a word to describe a combination of ideas. I argue that that's the whole point of creating words.

      The fact that it's an ugly word doesn't mean it's not a useful one. Isn't a euphemism usually used to obfuscate the meaning of another word or phrase? In which case 'blog' isn't a euphemism, because it doesn't obscure the phrase "online journal that is readable by the public", it clearly identifies it.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  62. Moderation, blah blah blah [OT] by thc69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think, actually, one of the reasons people mod "overrated" and "underrated" is because it's a way to mod numerically without having to choose a description that doesn't fit. The mod probably thought that it was a generally bad post, though not flamebait or trolling.

    Also, why can't a post at it's unmoderated default rating be overrated or underrated?

    --
    Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    1. Re:Moderation, blah blah blah [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's the intent of the "overrated" and "underrated" moderation options, sure. In practice, they're used for different purposes, simply because they cannot be metamoderated.

      A post at its default rating can't correctly be considered overrated or underrated, because it hasn't been rated yet. At least, that's some people's opinion. My opinion is that both moderation options are complete bullshit no matter when they're given, and will continue to be so until they are subject to metamoderation like every other option.

      --
      Waiting for that cold day in hell when /. gets its shit together

    2. Re:Moderation, blah blah blah [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Over\underrated are great. Thanks to them, we can have posts such as:
      • +5, Redundant
      • +5, Troll
      • +5, Flamebait
      etc.
    3. Re:Moderation, blah blah blah [OT] by thc69 · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ about an unmoderated post being ineligible for the descriptions "overrated" and "underrated". A default rating is still a rating. If a jerk posts drivel but has good karma, his default 2 is overrated. If an AC posts something useful, his default 0 is underrated.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  63. blogsearch too twitchy, try PubSub by Bernal+KC · · Score: 1
    I agree that Technorati is just about useless. They might actually be good if their servers were up to the task, but they are not. And trying to keep up but failing is worse than useless.

    My problem with google blog search is also its virtue. It treats the blog world as a flat surface, with all blogs being of equal importance. If you want to search for some high frequency keyword like, say, "Katrina", the results are totally useless. But if you have a very specific post you want to find like, say, "tech ronin backpack" it is a killer tool. (And yes, I like that I can search for and find posts in my blogs using google, but I can't with technorati.)

    It also doesn't help that it only lists results in chronological order -- at least with google news you can choose between relevance and date order. Pimping the post-of-the-minute reinforces the worst part of blogging -- the dreaded "first post" idiocy where masses of bloggers chase the meme-of-the-moment instead of taking a longer, more thoughtful view.

  64. Mod parent and GP up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two well argued sides of the issue, IMO.

  65. Modern day fad that replaced "Homepages" by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    Blogs are the modern day replacements for the "My Homepages" of the 1995-1998 era...

    ...except for the looping MIDI file, the obligatory "Page Under Construction" hard hat image, and the animated paper-folding,sliding-into-stamped-envelope,landin g-in-mailbox "e-mail me" GIF.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  66. most blogs are about cats owned by shutins by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    Most blogs are created by someone you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'blogging' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon.

    %s/Most/Nearly all/g
    %s/often/almost always/g

  67. i'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two comments, stating opposite viewpoints, both modded insightful? But, if they are both insightful, how do I know which one is MY opinion?

    Slashdot, oh slashdot, why hast thou forsaken me?

  68. Me too, me too, me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a neat Essay Blog online. Currently only two Essays in there, but I like to take quality over speed ;-), so I don't feel to bad about it.
    I'm actually quite found of the design ... I am a Designer, but condsidering it only took me 15 minutes to modify the template and have it blend that way ... the quick ones allways turn out best, don't you think? Even Design can be just good luck sometimes. :-)
    Oh, and btw, it runs on Pivot. Neat piece of Software that. Project link is on the page.

    Help me rake up some hits and que your opinions below. :-)

    http://www.writings.richdale.de/

    This is my Blog. There are thousands of others, but this is mine.

  69. This is what we wanted by Damek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, I remember when I was a teen and the internet was the new big thing (granted, this was the early 90's and the internet wasn't new then, but...)

    Everyone was saying how great it would be when everyone was able to easily create and share information.

    People, this is what we wanted, and it's pretty much here. This is a good thing. All we need now are better and better ways of sorting & indexing the information being created and shared.

  70. Weird by Ixne · · Score: 1

    I've always found it amazing how many people honestly have no idea that no one gives a crap what they have to say.

  71. Print Journalists Invading the Blogosphere by miller60 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The blog is as good as the author or idea behind it. The hot trend in blogging is the growth of business-related niche blogs written by a trained journalist who has bailed from their job at a daily newspaper of trade journal. Blog software, and the emerging business models based on Google AdSense make it easier than ever to be a stand-alone journalist (a term coined by Chris Nolan) and earn a decent living.

    The NY Times, Philadelphia Inquirer and San Jose Mercury News all announced staff layoffs last week. Where do you think those folks are going? To the Web, to eat their former employers' collective lunches. Lots of these folks have real expertise, and are bringing their contacts and rolodexes with them.

    I speak from experience. I took the plunge in 2000. I was the computer-assisted reporting director at a daily newspaper that was clueless about the future of the web, and unwilling to invest in the basics (e-mail for repoters ... doh!). So I left to write for technology sites, and have been doing it ever since.

  72. Sounds like Homer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Most blogs are created by someone you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'blogging' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon.
    vs.
    You know the kind of letters people write. "Dear somebody you've never heard of, How is so-and-so? Blah-blah-blah-blah-blah-blah-blah. Yours truly, some bozo."
    (Posted anonymously because I don't enjoy being that-guy-that-quotes-the-Simpsons).
  73. Re:Oh... BINGEing by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Oh right, I thought it was a corruption of the word "pinging". Especially since BlogPulse and Technorati seemed to be connected to this gorging of the net somehow.

  74. Re: Amen by s388 · · Score: 1

    amen to you. honestly. amen.

    the so-called "problem" really is a delusion of outsiders.

    the slashdot excerpt demonstrates these delusions quite well:

    "Most blogs are created by someone you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'blogging' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon."

    Wrong. if you specify an individual, and present them with every blog on the planet, the person probably won't care about the majority of the blogs. but crucially, if you specify any given blog, the chances are extremely high that at least SOMEBODY will be interested in it. You can say "nobody cares" ad nauseum. it's arguable whether or not anybody cares, but the point is, the bloggers don't care whether anybody cares.

    "There are even blogs about blogs such as The Blog Herald. It looks like everyone wants their fifteen minutes of fame online."

    Who says anybody wants fame? not a SINGLE ONE of the great popular blogs i know ever had any pretensions about fame or attention or the spotlight. some blogs become big, others stay small. bloggers will blog, regardless.

    humans like to communicate and to form communities with likeminded individuals. the only problems are these: how does one find the weblogs that will and loggers who will appeal to them? and secondly, when will the sensational detractors and knee-jerk "Nobody Cares What You Think!" peanut gallery get over it?

    i've read blogs from all over the world. the internet has closed so many gaps of TIME and SPACE between people, i've absorbed peoples thoughts and ideas that previously i never would have had any contact with (or at least it would have been very difficult or limited). i'm speaking more generally about the internet as a whole, but the potential for human interaction and exchange is unprecedented in human history. weblogs are just the latest form that the planetary social cyberweb has taken.

    somebody who posts random thoughts or pictures of their cat is doing the most passively expressive thing possible: they're not dictating anything to anybody, they're not demanding anything, they're just making their own existence manifest in cyberspace. (maybe someone will care, great, maybe the person just likes doing it, great, maybe nobody will care--ANY HARM DONE? no). on the other hand, the chorus of snobbery is pretty noxious in contrast. projecting that somebody is demanding attention or assuming "Everybody Cares About Me!" is just a means for putting-on a bunch of reactionary nonsense.

  75. Re:Oh... BINGEing by Site+Pixie · · Score: 1

    Actually, I spelt it as 'bingeing' in my original submission, but it was editied to 'binging'. In fact, I had no idea that 'binging' was an alternative spelling. You learn something new everyday.

    --
    SitePixie.com - Get your stuff online and shake it about.
  76. Missing the Point? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    Most conversations are between people you don't know, often about something you don't care about, but that hasn't stopped 'talking' from becoming a remarkably ubiquitous phenomenon.

    Just because something is mainly important only to those who know the people involved, doesn't stop it being a useful thing for those people, or have anything to do with how popular the phenomenon should be.

  77. Re:Oh... BINGEing by jfengel · · Score: 1

    I can at least understand it when editors leave in typos out of laziness, but to go out of their way to introduce them seems egregious.

  78. isnt Slashdot also a blog site........ by Jimy · · Score: 1

    if u come to think..aint slashdot also a blog site..a successful and one of the most visited sites.. blogs are more of a community creating utility rather than any else..someone wants to talk about something..if u r interested thn join or else do your own talking..i dnt see how this simple thing bother some people..by calling it spam you are disregarding the fact that blog is personal thing and you are disrespecting the fact of freedom of speech(write).. i am starting to think..slashdot is becoming a place ppl just hv to be opiniated on every topic no matter what it means..we always need to hv two sides of the discussion..is it really necessary..???

  79. Re: trip to Ottawa by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    I've been blogging semi-regularly since 2002 as a way to journalize my trip to Ottawa
    Since 2002?
    And you aren't there yet?
    What, did you start on foot or something from Australia?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana