Slashdot Mirror


Portable Storage Guide

Elite 4CE writes "If you're like me, you are always transporting data from home to work, and back. I was surprized at how many options there were to facilitate this. Hardcoreware.net have posted their Portable Storage Guide for 2005, covering everything from flash based devices that fit into your pocket, to huge FireWire drives with a capacity of 400GB."

25 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. New Category by geomon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How long until there is a category for embedded DRM as described in this article?

    It will probably start out with a few devices with DRM, but slowly everyone of the storage vendors will have a DRM solution. It will only be a matter of time, really.

    That said, the Seagate 100GB unit looks sweet.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:New Category by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why use a 100gb device to haul your files around? You can mod an iPod Nano to 200GB.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    2. Re:New Category by geomon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why use a 100gb device to haul your files around? You can mod an iPod Nano [uncyclopedia.org] to 200GB.

      Holy crap! that was good.

      You had me all set for some elegant looking finished product. This is more like Frankenstein's monster!

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    3. Re:New Category by cgreuter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It will only be a matter of time, really.

      No it won't. This is one of those situations where market forces will do the right thing. DRM makes storage devices less useful. Most people who buy removable storage already know this. The ones that don't will find out as soon as they buy their DRM-encumbered device.

      The basic principal of economics--sell people stuff they want--won't go away just because Hollywood has hyped up DRM. We--not the entertainment industry--are the customers. We pay their revenues and we'll stop doing that if they start making crappy (i.e. DRM'd) products. Given the sheer number of storage makers out there right now, it's not going to be difficult to switch to some else.

    4. Re:New Category by Random_Goblin · · Score: 3, Funny

      dumbshit, it was uncyclopedia.org not wikipedia

      you see this just demonstrates the futility of wiki when random people can just change log in and change the domain name as and when they feel like!

  2. Surprizing? Hardly... by ggambett · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd say it's more like "amasing"... really, typos are not that "amuzing".

  3. Beware Large Externals by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Informative

    We have used some of the 250GB Western Digitals here and a known fault is that, if you remove the drive improperly, it will corrupt the entire drive. Rendering useless all 200+ gigs of info on there. But yeah, other than that, they work great! So be careful how you unplug and always use the "Remove Drive" feature.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Beware Large Externals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This has nothing to do with the specific model of drive. Not telling the OS you intend to remove the drive will corrupt the file system for the exact same reason as if you shut down your computer by pulling the plug out of the wall. The OS does write caching. It must be given the opportunity to flush that cache.

      Kids these days don't know nothing...

    2. Re:Beware Large Externals by tigris · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or just optimize the drive for quick removal. This disables write caching.

    3. Re:Beware Large Externals by siliconjunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      That only works for FAT formatted drives, not NTFS.

    4. Re:Beware Large Externals by whiteranger99x · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, the "Remeve Drive" option is right below the "Format Drive" in the pull down menu. Oops!

      You think that's bad, instead of selecting Remove Drive, I inadvertently selected Mail To All...and I still need to figure out how I'm going to explain to my grandma and my aunts why they got my midget porn...

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
  4. Large RAID at home by Mad-Mage1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With the ability to push to my house from work at over 8 Mbps, I rarely worry about this

    --
    The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
  5. um... I have a life away from work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If you're like me, you are always transporting data from home to work, and back."

    No, I'm not like you. I like to keep work at work, and out of my home, where I have better things to do than work.

    1. Re:um... I have a life away from work by Le+Marteau · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You probably work for a true IT company. I don't. I work for a traditional publisher which happens to require and have IT people.

      I'm amazed your employer allows you to walk around with company data in your pocket.

      Not only do they allow us, they GAVE us flash drives as tokens of appreciation after completion of some project (with the company name and project title silk screened on it).

      Not everyone with IT skills works for a tech savvy company. I do all my work on my 1 gig flash drive, pop it out and take it home, then plug it into my home machine, where it gets backed up every night. It's a much more reliable solution than their network backups, which are iffy.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  6. Slashdotted by mysqlrocks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdotted already. Maybe they can put the article on one of these devices and send one to each of us?

  7. Huge? Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    huge FireWire drives with a capacity of 400GB
    Well that might be enough to store the thumbnails of my porn collection, but I'll wait for the portable TB storage, thanks.
  8. I used to ... but thumb drives kick butt. by everphilski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to. It worked well. But after having a thumb drive for a month I wouldn't switch back. I have my entire "my documents" and development tree stored on my thumb drive. It is always the latest and most updated version. When I arrive at work, I copy it over. When I leave work, i copy from the computer to the thumb drive. Same as home. The internet worked ... unless internet was out at home. Or if internet was out at work. And the data was too preicous not to have even for a few hours. And when you are in an environment where internet traffic is heavily monitored (and pushing upwards of 100M) the thumb drive reigns supreme.

    -everphilski-

  9. This is all BS.. Everyone quit lying.. by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I swear.. we're all guilty here. Please stop lying. We all use the floppy disk. I don't care who you are (but more likely so if you're a government employee), you have a green floppy disk in your briefcase that has a masking-tape label on it written with pencil..

    I see this all the time.. people thinking they're cool on campus with their laptop and 1GB USB thumb drive.. plugging in a floppy to get at the 1.44mb of data they really need.

    LONG LIVE THE FLOPPY! *salute*

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  10. iPod Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to suggest the iPod Nano as a good portable storage device, but now I am having second thoughts. Better scratch that idea!

  11. Security Risks? by MandoSKippy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not saying Poster is security risk. But as someone who does security audits for banks, "taking data home" ie becoming more and more of a Security risk. It is easy for an employee to copy, burn, etc information with customer data with it. Another issue is smaller banks don't have the dedicated resources to devote to proper DRM and OEMS like Dell often include CD-Rs and make USB flash drives so cheap that it gets more and more troublesom to block it.

  12. Re:Why carry something? by Surt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the main reason is this:

    You have 400 megabyte of data. You want to take it with you to work on (or maybe listen to) at another computer. You can:

    Flash drive: Copy to flash drive at 10megabytes/sec. Call that a minute with overhead. Requires the destination computer have USB.

    Internet: Email it through google mail, using googlefs at the speed of your internet connection. Typically, most people today are living with 5 megabit per second or less. Call that 15 minutes, more if you can't max out your connection, or are living with a slower connection. Requires destination computer have (fast!) internet service. 15 minutes or more likely to extract your data at the other end. This is all assuming there is no overhead for google mail. If you have static ip, maybe you are hosting this data directly, still requires a typical 15 minute one way trip, but how many people have a static ip for their home machine?

    Portable hard drive: Copy to portable hard drive at 20 megabytes/sec. Call that 30 seconds, but costs more than the flash option.

    I'll take either of the carry it with me options over the internet most days. Even more so on days when my data set that needs to travel is 30 gigabyte.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  13. They forgot by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Funny

    I see they missed the most important device of all, the mega-uber-1337-6.7GHz, eleventy-billion TB laptop

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  14. Coralized by Milican · · Score: 3, Informative

    Coralized

    JOhn

  15. Software for your portable deviced by leftyfb · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who have USB flash drives or just about any other type of portable media, check out http://www.no-install.com/ Tons of applications that you can run from your portable media and not have to worry about losing your settings betweeb different machines.

  16. Disk Format by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do I still have to format the 400gb drive as Fat32 to get both my Mac and Windows XP box to read it? Why hasn't anybody come up with a file system that supports large capacity portable drives on every OS?