Slashdot Mirror


Jamming Cellphones with Text Messages

Steve writes "Some Penn State professors and students have published a way to jam cellular voice service with simple text messages. From the article: 'Because text messages are transmitted on the same signal that is used to set up voice calls, just 165 messages a second is enough to disrupt all cellphones in Manhattan.' Cellular providers, of course, fired back, one stating that it 'constantly and aggressively monitors potential threats to the integrity and security of its network.'"

27 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. One problem. by Musteval · · Score: 4, Interesting

    165 messages a second would cost you about ten thousand dollars a minute, at the prices the cell companies charge.

    --
    Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    1. Re:One problem. by jerw134 · · Score: 3, Informative

      $990/minute, assuming a charge of 10 cents per message.

    2. Re:One problem. by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny
      $990/minute, assuming a charge of 10 cents per message.

      Ch-rist! For that price, I could have a dozen women heavy breathing on my cellphone, telling me how much they love it when I do that to them!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. Blackberry jam by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    more like!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  3. URLs for actual paper by mblaze · · Score: 5, Informative

    A more detailed description of the threat is at smsanalysis.org/. The actual paper at smsanalysis.org/smsanalysis.pdf.

  4. I call shenanigans... by The_Rippa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't you think that there are already more than 165 text messages being sent out every second in Manhattan?

    1. Re:I call shenanigans... by mirqry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think its even close. 165/sec lets say from 8am to 8pm is 7,128,000. Around 1.5 million people in Manhattan. So that would be saying every single man, woman, and child in the Manhattan send 4.75 text messages a day.

  5. Re:u r hot by rk87 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Easy enough, about 3 or 4 japanese school girls should be able to send a sustained rate of 180 messages a second.

    --
    I'M NOT ANGRY!
  6. Texting phones is free with Google by popo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most people don't know that you can send text messages for free through Google's text messaging service.

    http://toolbar.google.com/send/sms/index.php

    Now all you need is a perl script and ... hello? ...hello?

    -------------

    judge a man by his wallet

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  7. Text is low priority raffic by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    AFAIK, text is typically low priority traffic, but that can depend on configuration, network type etc. Network control is highest, voice next, followed by data and text.

    The reason for this prioritisation is that delaying isochronous (eg. voice) data makes it unusable, but backing up text is OK. If you try jamming with text all you'll end up with is a load of backed up text.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  8. Re:165 msgs a sec OR by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You could send 165 text messages a second OR you could keep calling the phone you want to disrupt!

    Except this isn't about disrupting one phone - this is about disrupting the entire regional network. Just the sort thing a criminal or terrorist might want to do during or in the wake of some mal-behavior. So it costs a bunch to send those messages? So what? Bad guys can have some real (or fraudulant) financial resources when that's part of their plan.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  9. now I know why text messages cost a fortune... by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Because text messages are transmitted on the same signal that is used to set up voice calls

    Ah. So that's why it costs an insane amount of money to send a text message (well, that and a text message may mean "no phone call to bill for".)

    Also- can anyone explain why data is still so damn expensive? I have a data capable phone w/bluetooth, I travel a fair bit...but I don't ever use the data service, because it's so incredibly expensive. 2-8MB runs you almost as much as the voice service does!

    Seems like they could make a lot of people happy if they made data more affordable. I guess we'll have to wait for one of the providers to start competing on that front, instead of buying each other up? :-)

  10. No 12 Days of Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last year I had a friend that wrote an app that would text message a verse from the 12 days of Christmas every day, but something went horribly wrong and I was getting messaged a verse from that damn song every few milliseconds for a couple hours straight. Not fun.

    Hey Steve! (you ass)

  11. What? by EvanED · · Score: 4, Informative
    Your comments directly contradict the NY Times article...

    The system works even when cellular calls do not because text messages are small packets of data that are easy to send, and because the companies transmit them on the high-priority channel whose main purpose is to set up cellphone calls.


    Do you have a source?
    1. Re:What? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I don't have a source, but from my experience with Orange (in the UK), I've found it to be the same as the OP.

      One day while I was sending text messages I was getting a surprisingly high percentage of failed sends, so I called their technical helpline, gave my postal code etc and was told the base station nearest to me was undergoing maintanence and thus would have a reduced capacity for around 24 hours, and because voice traffic had priority over SMS/data there may be intermittent issues.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  12. Its not just the spammer's fault by NextGaurd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Part of the blame rests on people who complain about spam but then buy things advertised through spam. Without this reinforcement spammers would be greatly diminished.

  13. Re:165 msgs a sec OR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So it costs a bunch to send those messages? So what? Bad guys can have some real (or fraudulant) financial resources when that's part of their plan.

    1) Sign cell phone contract with monthly billing.
    2) Send massive amounts of text messages.
    3) Blow self up.
    4) Don't care if phone bill is high at end of month - having too much fun with the 72 virgins.
    5) ...
    6) Profit?

  14. Re:165 msgs a sec OR by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Funny

    6) Profit?

    Don't you mean "Prophet?"

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  15. Re:u r hot by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but lets face it. There are so much better things to do with 3 or 4 japanese school girls than text messages.

    --
    The laws of probability forbid it!
  16. Re:165 msgs a sec OR by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you think 2 to 4 simultaneous telephone calls will take down a cellular network, the thing would have stopped working a long time ago.

    But... I think it's not the vox bandwidth - it's that part of the system that manages the call overhead (per the summary, the part of the system that "sets up" the calls). I believe that housekeeping does indeed take place in a smaller, and separate piece of the spectrum and the network's plumbing. Of course, IANATE (I am not a telecommunications engineer). Text messaging piggy-backs on the data that keeps the system and the phones aware of each other - long before a call (and the related bandwidth) is actually assigned to an user that dials/answers. This would be when someone who works for Verizon or Spring would anonymously chime. We can hear you now, good.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  17. Per City, or per Cell? by throx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't buy it for one very big reason - the cells are functionally independant and Manhattan has a *lot* of cells. That means you could shut down a single cell with text messages if you targetted a single phone but a simple throttle on the number of messages to a single phone number would prevent that.

    Now if you could figure out how to send messages to a bunch of different phones all in the same cell then you may be able to take that one cell out of business for a while, but DoS all of Manhattan? I think not.

    --

    Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

  18. Re:SMS is quite popular in Europe, how come not Do by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason is in the EU areas, bandwidth isn't so TIGHTLY restricted. That's why they've got internet connections better than what most of the USA has. Most people I know of in the EU areas pay roughly equivalent to what we do for a 10 mbit down / 2 mbit up connection, if not higher. (These are people on IRC, I wouldn't know about those I know thru IM services)

    We've got, what?? Comcast with 7 mbit (shared) down and 1.5 mbit (dedicated) up, as the "potentially best" service? (Roadrunner offers 10 mbit down, but only 512 kbit up, Speakeasy is 6 mbit down dedicated, 768 kbit up dedicated?)

    These people have a much larger pipeline to use. *NOW* the big difference is the pipeline leaving their country to go to other countries. Any bets on where most of that data gets sent? You betcha, USA.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  19. what is even more evil... by first_tracks · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can email a text message to someone's phone, and for some carriers it is an automatic $0.10 or more a message received and the reciever can't not recieve it. Here are all the SMS addys:

    Sprint: 10-digit-number@messaging.sprintpcs.com
    Verizon: 10-digit-nmber@vtext.com
    AT&T: 10-digit-number@mobile.att.net
    T Mobile: 10-digit-number@tmomail.net
    Nextel: 10-digit-number@messaging.nextel.com
    Cingular: 10-digit-number@mobile.mycingular.net
    Alltel: 10-digit-number@message.alltel.com

    i can see how they could put in safe-guards like monitoring multiple messages from an IP in a certain time frame. but, smart programmers can work around this fairly easily.

  20. Blackberry has the same problem by killercoder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in 2000 I was writing native Blackberry applications. At the time the RIM network was Artus, and you could send 100's of short Artus packets directly to the MIN of the device. BAM! The tower went down till you stopped. The smaller the message the higher the priority - the easier it was to bring down the tower.

    "We monitor our network for security issues - BULLSHIT", they monitor the billing systems and channels for abuse - sure - but not the QOS.

  21. VERY TYPICAL OF GSM by KayEyeDoubleDee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several years ago I was involved in solving a similiar problem in the GSM/MAP/SS7 backbone network of a major European cellular provider/broker. In that case, there was an problem because the SMS messaging is carried in the MAP "signalling" layer, which resulted in the waste of the vast majority of the bandwidth that was meant to be used to handle subscriber management, roaming, authentication, etc. The network (which provided roaming between 100+ sizable European, Asian, and North African carriers) was being saturated with internet-generated SMS text messaging. Essentially, we were only able to block the traffic, having little control over its generation and/or entry into the network.

    Clearly the people that designed the air interface made the same poor architectural decision.

  22. Telco networks are not like the Internet by AB3A · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who have never looked at a real phone network, allow me some bandwidth:

    Nobody has ever allowed for a one to one switching network like you may have seen with a switched hub. It's too expensive. They use trunk lines instead. The number of trunk lines depends on the statistics of the local area calling. There are benchmarks to use for various types of service. These systems are designed for four and five nines of up time. But it's not overload proof. You have all gotten fast busy signals before. That's because there were no trunks available.

    What these folks have figured out is how much bandwidth a typical cell site can have. They have figured out how many text messages it would take to fill up that available bandwidth. Big Deal. Cell sites do saturate. This is not a design "flaw" --it's a design point. Just as almost nobody builds buildings to withstand 200 MPH winds, almost nobody builds that much bandwidth in to a cell site. You could, but it would almost never get used.

    Instead we build them to handle almost all conditions. Yes, they can saturate. That's a political design issue. Someone who knows the design points can certainly overload one. But during normal use, they will work just fine. Since there are no lasting effects from such overload, most engineers figure that people will just clear out before things get too dicey.

    Naturally, some twits who want to jam cell phone conversations will find plenty of ways to do this. The network is built for civil use --not military use. That's why police and fire authorities use seperate communications networks (or if they don't they're just asking for trouble). That's why ham radio operators are often able to render assistance when everyone else is busy trying to call home. Common Carrier networks will overload at some point, just as roads can saturate and slow to a crawl. We'll never have enough bandwidth or enough roads. But we can ensure that there will be enough to get by.

    The Times could do for a brief lesson in engineering design criteria...

    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!