Slashdot Mirror


SUSE 10.0 OSS Released

O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O writes "Today, Novell released SuSE 10.0 OSS for download. Product highlights include kernel 2.6.13, gcc 4.0.2, glibc 2.3.5, improved boot times and Xen 3. Torrents are available for the i386, ppc and x86_64 versions. The downloadable OSS edition lacks some packages for licensing reasons of which some, like Java, can be installed via package repository."

42 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Stability by michaelzhao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With SUSE releasing one suite after another. I sometimes wonder about stability. When was 9.3 released? Wasn't it only a few months ago? I wish SUSE should find a way to follow Slackware's model of stable releases without sacrificing too much market share.

    Also, the software is getting way to bloated. Why all the software packages SUSE?

    1. Re:Stability by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SuSE has always included lots of packages -- it's a feature, not a bug!

      No, really. You aren't required to install all of them, after all.

    2. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      software is getting bloated because customers are asking for features. It happens to almost all software.

    3. Re:Stability by MikeB90 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want stsble long time, corporate quality distrib you buy Novell Linux Desktop or SLES/OES. Suse 10 is for hobbyists, and like the Suse Pro 9.x releases is a quarterly release cycle roughly.

    4. Re:Stability by sloanster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With SUSE releasing one suite after another. I sometimes wonder about stability. When was 9.3 released? Wasn't it only a few months ago? I wish SUSE should find a way to follow Slackware's model of stable releases without sacrificing too much market share.

      Also, the software is getting way to bloated. Why all the software packages SUSE?


      As has been the case for years, suse releases an upgrade about every 6 months, so I'm not sure I understand what your objection is. Nobody is forcing you to upgrade - and if you prefer Slackware, run slackware.

      As to the software getting "too bloated", nobody is forcing you to install anything - you can easily install a bare bones system, without X-windows if that makes you happy. It's all in the install menu, these are all very basic concepts.

    5. Re:Stability by beetle99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think that they (Novell) looked at the approach that Red Hat has used and thought that it makes sense. RHES has less frequent releases, designed to be more stable, while Fedora is updated much more often. Novell is just doing the same thing with SLES and SUSE Linux 10.0.
      Compare:

      SUSE Linux 10.0 Comparative Features and Benefits
      Enterprise Linux or Fedora?

      So if you want a more stable release, then both Red Hat and Novell want you to pay for it. If you use the free versions, you get new features more often, but sacrifice some stability. And you aren't forced to upgrade immediately. It's still more stable than some other operating systems.

    6. Re:Stability by sloanster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want stsble long time, corporate quality distrib you buy Novell Linux Desktop or SLES/OES. Suse 10 is for hobbyists, and like the Suse Pro 9.x releases is a quarterly release cycle roughly.

      I'm not sure what you mean by "hobbyists" but it sounds vaguely insulting.

      IMHO it would be more accurate to say that SuSE 10 is a full-featured distro for linux power users, while the more verticalized sles/nld are meant for the corporate market, managers who don't mind things being a little stale, and who want to have an 800-number to call, any time, should they ever have any questions.

      OpenSuSE is in some ways analagous to fedora, except that you can't get a boxed set of fedora linux, nor fedora manuals, nor any fedora support from the vendor, while with SuSE, you have the option of downloading and freely using OpenSuSE, or purchasing SuSE 10.0 retail, which comes with all the extras -

      BTW I know of several small businesses running their networks and services on suse linux professional servers, and are quite happy with it. No "hobbyists" they!

    7. Re:Stability by bigtangringo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh dude, you can download the 5 CD version of 10 if you want.
      # CD ISO image 1 (32bit, 702 MB)
      # CD ISO image 2 (32bit, 730 MB)
      # CD ISO image 3 (32bit, 734 MB)
      # CD ISO image 4 (32bit, 726 MB)
      # CD ISO image 5 (32bit, 733 MB)

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    8. Re:Stability by krayfx · · Score: 3, Informative

      get the suse super then! thats a single cd version!!! get the rest of them, say the propreietary bits like java and stuff later when yu connect again. this single cd version has a kde build and a gnome build, also something known as "slick". i am using the beta version currently and will soon upgrade the single cd - kde only final release - it was pretty good for a beta even, BTW.

  2. PPC? by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had been under the impression that SuSE had not had a ppc release in a while (since~7.2?). Glad to see they're back with it, it might just tempt me to migrate my apple-debian servers to SuSE ppc (I love SuSE's config tools).

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  3. Can never keep up... by TypoNAM · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damnit. I just received my SuSE 9.3 Professional DVD from Novell last week and it's already outdated. I can never seem to keep up to date on software these days. :(

    --
    This space is not for rent.
  4. I hope XeN on x86_64 works better than on the RC by cduffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Per subject. I've done testing at my place at work using the release candidate (we're interested in Xen3 on x86_64... once SLES10 comes out and it's fully supported, of course), and it wasn't exactly successful. It did give me a chance to file some bugs, and Novell reported one of them fixed in their bugtracker -- but I still was unable to start up a DomU.

    Hopefully the release will be more effective. As for me, I'm playing with the 10.1 alpha, which I hear is what will eventually become SLES10.

  5. bloatedness - good point by davidwr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen it in smaller distros and I'd like to see it in bigger ones:

    Customized ISOs where you choose your packages THEN download the ISO.

    Heck, if disk space is a problem these "ISOs" can even exist only virtually on the web server, with the "iso" being created on the fly from component files. Hmm, if there's not already a program out there to do that then I should get started writing one :).

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:bloatedness - good point by taylork · · Score: 5, Informative

      Suse usually has a "network install" which is pretty much like this.

    2. Re:bloatedness - good point by bytor4232 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, with Debian you can download an iso image thats right around 50 megs, and everything else is installed via the web. Similar concept, no?

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    3. Re:bloatedness - good point by cortana · · Score: 4, Informative

      It makes more sense to create a program, we could call it Jigdo, that downloads the debs you want and constructs the iso on the client machine. ;)

  6. 10.0 is about when you rethink your naming scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously, is there any software out there that is like version 18? Well, I guess emacs is at 21....

  7. Evolutionary or revolutionary? by claes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there anything in particular that motivates the jump in major version, or is it just a marketing thing? I purchased 9.3 - will 10.0 bring me anything that is new and interesting, or just more recent packages of the same software? For example, exactly how is the faster boot process accomplished? Are there new configuration modules in Yast? New features in package managment? New freedesktop standards implemented, new LSB standards implemented.. what is really interesting about this release, what should make me jump to upgrade?

    1. Re:Evolutionary or revolutionary? by photon317 · · Score: 3, Insightful


      gcc-4.x is a big, big step. If I were a distro, I'd make a major version bump just for gcc's major version bump if for no other reason. You want your clients to be very aware of all the potential fallout from the gcc upgrade, especially this early.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:Evolutionary or revolutionary? by nordi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With version 10.0 they opened the distribution to the community, or at least they have started the process. This version had the first ever public beta test for Suse Linux. I think that is quite revolutionary when you compare it to how things used to be.

    3. Re:Evolutionary or revolutionary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      100% evolutionary. This makes sense with openSUSE's new rapid development schedule, 10.1 alpha is already out and had been for about a week before 10.0 gold was released. I've been using various flavors of SUSE since the beginning of this year and I can say each release has been a healthy speedup in terms of boot time as well as user feel. Newer releases have just seemed faster. I can attest that 10.0 RC 1 was a decent spead increase over 9.3. Partly KDE improvements and partly openSUSE bloat removal.

      In terms of improvements over 9.3 I noticed a few neat features in Yast that make refreshing Yast sources easier. Also, 10.0 RC 1 picked up my Sony XDM monitors without any hassle, unlike 9.3 where I had to manually set the frequencies.

      Revolutionary? Hardly. Nice small evolutions towards a Windows replacement desktop? Definitely. And since the entire distro is now free (only the boxed sets costs $$$) don't feel compelled to buy every release.

  8. Re:Interesting, but only if a certain bug is fixed by ZakuSage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a friend who's had their Linux server running since the last blackout here, appx 10 months ago.

  9. _THE_ DISTRIBUTION by cies · · Score: 4, Interesting

    okay, okay... we all still have to test it. but this has good potential to become _the_ distribution. It performs we on both the server side with (with standards, service, licencing, training, certifying, oracle, etc. etc.), and on the desktop side (with loads of UI improvements, YaST, quicker booting, suspend to disk, automatic network configuring).

    And it seems that also the doing well on both the corporate (Novell Desktop, SuSE entreprise) and the freesoftware side with this glorious new release.

    i really whish OpenSuse the best, yet im not installing right now since 9.3 still does all i need and i have a lack of spare time already. but i will be soon!

    if you are installing make shure to check out:
    http://www.suseforums.net/ -- all things suse inlcuding community support, and
    http://packman.links2linux.org/ -- the missing (some times not fully legal) mulitmedia packages.

    g'luck,
    Cies Breijs.

  10. work in progress by vlad_petric · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe that xen/x86_64 is work in progress (Xen FAQ). Give Novel some slack here ... The real question is how well Xen/Novel works on suse/ia32. I really like xen, the only problem is that it takes quite a while to setup right.

    --

    The Raven

  11. Xen 3.0 by samj · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the best news I've heard all day - I can't even get Xen 3.0 from Xen, so I guess they've thrown in TimeTravel 1.0 as well.

    1. Re:Xen 3.0 by jonastullus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      yeah, and when having a closer look at their feature list:

      http://www.opensuse.org/Xen3_Status_and_Updates

      we can see that they have package a far from ready "xen 3.0" with their supposedly stable release of their distribution. maybe it really IS a more-or-less stable branch of the "still in development" xen cvs tree, but the xen developers don't see it fit yet to be released, so why should novell/suse?

      i mean, maybe some of these "limitations" are really non-features/problems in the final xen3 (when it comes out), but this seriously doesn't sound all that great:

      • Graphics (AGP, DRM, 3D) don't work or even crash the machine
      • Hardware support is still limited (e.g. no PCMCIA)
      • ACPI support in Domain-0 is limited (e.g. no cpufreq)
      • 32 Bit kernel is not PAE enabled
      • Full virtualization on VT not well tested
      • Other Operating System support on top of Xen and VT not tested

  12. A bit off-topic, but... by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 4, Funny
    "O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O writes..."

    ...frankly, with a name like that, I wouldn't be able to write much of anything.

    --
    Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
  13. No disrespect to O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O... by Darune · · Score: 5, Funny

    No disrespect to O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O, but when I first glimpsed the article I thought CowboyNeal was having a heart attack. ;p

    --
    Oh crap, I'm on fire again.
  14. I love my Suse by nrgy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a on and off suse user from 7.0 to 8."something". Then I left windows and stuck with suse from 9.0 to the present. I love suse for a noob distro. I like the fact that if you want to not worry about the core workings you dont have to, or if you want to not worry but still be able to learn you can. I've gradualy learned to work in the terminal more, do alot of things in the command line, compiling my applications and even started programing my own little tools in c and c++.

    I'm a whatever tool works use it kinda guy and the same applys for distros. It's good to see all linux distros being updated and offering newer and better linux experiences. It's a shame Microsoft already took the slogin "Where do you want to go today?" because thats what each new version of Suse makes me think.

  15. OSS version? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From this page at Novell titled "Packages on the retail version and not the OSS version of SUSE Linux 10.0". It lists packages that you would get if you bought the retail version because those packages are not OSS? I have not looked at the whole list yet, however, a few big ticket-items (to me) stood out:
    eclipse-gtk2-3.1-4.i586.rpm
    eclipse-jdt-3.1-4.i586.rpm
    eclipse-platform-3.1-4.i586.rpm
    eclipse-scripts-3.1-4.i586.rpm
    Since when did Eclipse become non-OSS? According to www.eclipse.org
    Eclipse is an open source community whose projects are focused on providing an extensible development platform and application frameworks for building software. Eclipse provides extensible tools and frameworks that span the software development lifecycle, including support for modeling, language development environments for Java, C/C++ and others, testing and performance, business intelligence, rich client applications and embedded development. A large, vibrant ecosystem of major technology vendors, innovative start-ups, universities and research institutions and individuals extend, complement and support the Eclipse Platform.
    There is another one I noticed:
    bitstream-vera-1.10-169.noarch.rpm
    I thought the Bitstream Vera fonts were release under an OSS license? I know I have enjoyed those excellent fonts under Fedora for a while now. Why doesn't SuSE OSS offer them in the OSS version?

    Did anyone else notice other OSS software in the list that SuSE left out of the OSS version claiming that it is NOT OSS when in fact it is?

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  16. Torrent mirror by zeth · · Score: 4, Informative

    I tried downloading the torrents from the ftp a while back and it was bogged. I have a copy of them, if their servers get bogged down again at http://johnny.chadda.se/2005/10/06/suse-100-finall y-released/

    By the way, I have tried the 10.0 RC1 and it was really great. The only thing not working is my P910i sync, but I'll work on that. :)

  17. And OpenXChange by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many of them, I think, are missing because of their dependency on (non-open-source) Java, which is not included. (In other words, Eclipse itself is OSS, but since it relies of non-OSS Java, they leave it out too.)

    I have no idea about the bitstream vera fonts, though - that makes no sense to me at all, since I was sure they were distributed as open source...

  18. Re:GM? by Ruediger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gold Master

    "I'm glad to announce the final version (aka the Goldmaster) of SUSE Linux 10.0. Developing 10.0 as part of the openSUSE project with an open bugzilla was a new and great experience. Thanks a lot to everybody that contributed in testing, reporting and fixing bugs, discussions etc."

    source

    --
    "...personality goes a long way."
  19. Where is the source DVD? by AaronW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I received my copy of SuSE 10 today but have yet to install it. One thing I noticed is that the source DVD is no longer included. Version 9.3 Professional included 5 CDs and 2 DVDs, one DVD containing the source code. Hopefully it won't require me to go to SuSE's FTP site, which has always been notoriously slow (hopefully some of the mirrors will have the source code).

    As it is right now, I do not see the source code on their FTP site, nor do I see how they can fit everything for both the 32-bit and 64-bit and the source code on a single DVD unless they have cut back significantly on what's included.

    The reason I'm looking for the source code is I want to see if they have added the Gentoo patch to Xorg to support the event interface for the mouse so I can take advantage of the extra buttons on my Logitech MX1000 mouse. I patched earlier versions of SuSE's X, but without the source I won't be able to do it with this version.

    If I can apply this patch and if the kernel is more responsive on my Athlon64 I'll finally be able to switch my new desktop machine to my Athlon64. SuSE 9.3 tended to stutter at times when using the GUI. Also, hopefully some of the issues I've run into with V4L2 with my pcHDTV tuner card will also be addressed by the new kernel.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  20. Re:This is a quality distro by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Informative
    Really admire SUSE and have used it for several years now. I only wish Novell admired the tremendous care and hard work put in by the SUSE engineers, but if you go to the front page of http://www.novell.com/ you'd be pushed to know Novell even have SUSE. This new version and the new OpenSUSE initiative are things to shout about, one might think. Sigh. Novell are their own worst enemies.
    SuSE Linux and SuSE Enterprise Server are listed under Products directly on that page. They receive no special attention but then they aren't hidden either. There's also a rather prominent Flash add detailing 10 reasons to choose Novel Linux solutions.

    As for Novell 'shouting out' about OpenSuSE, please keep in mind that Novell is a corporate entity doing business with other corporate entities and is much more likely to tout the products that it sells, thus generating revenue which can then support community projects like OpenSuSE. OpenSuSE is not a make or break for Novel, it is more a gesture towards the community and a thumb in the eye of RedHat/Fedora. I am more impressed with Novel's decision to continue offering a supported consumer version of SuSE rather than abandoning the consumer market like RedHat.

  21. Re:10.0 is about when you rethink your naming sche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Version 18 is nothing. I've seen versions 95, 98... And they still had a lot of problems :)

  22. Hacking OpenSuSE by Shadow+Labs · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a good resource here on how to install the packages that are missing from the OSS version:

    Hacking OpenSuSE

    --

    echo $SIG
  23. Re:Downloading/Installing by weekendgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ummmm...... You're wrong.

    SuSE from 9.0 has had NTFS resizing. Even mounts your NTFS windows partition as /windows/C

    --
    It would be presumptuous to conclude that Americans have no right to know what is being done in their name
  24. Installing commercial apps by seguso · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a guide for adding sources to Yast and installing proprietary applications (java, realplayer, codecs, dvd capabilities, acrobat reader...) : http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/178 /42/

  25. Re:10.0 is about when you rethink your naming sche by archen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chessmaster is at 9000 or higher by now