Slashdot Mirror


The Art of Particle Physics

PhysicsDavid writes to tell us about an article in Symmetry magazine. Jan-Henrik Anderson, a designer with a background in architecture, has collaborated with several particle physicists to develop visual representations of particles based on their physical characteristics. It is the closest most will ever get to 'seeing' a top quark.

18 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It must just be me by Neil+Blender · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I don't see much difference in the representation of top and down quarks in the panels shown.

    Lucky you. I don't see a damn thing because Slashdot has destroyed another unlucky webserver.

  2. Re:It must just be me by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > > But I don't see much difference in the representation of top and down quarks in the panels shown.
    >
    > Lucky you. I don't see a damn thing because Slashdot has destroyed another unlucky webserver.

    You're leaping to conclusions.

    I also don't see a damn thing, but from that I can conclude only that Slashdot has placed a webserver in a superposition of states between lucky-and-destroyed, lucky-and-not-destroyed, unlucky-and-destroyed, and unlucky-and-not-destroyed.

  3. Particles by AlphaSector · · Score: 1, Funny

    can apparently be slashdotted too

  4. An absolutely PERFECT representation by LithiumX · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's perfect. When you go there, you see nothing. This is probably the best way to visually describe a quark - something which is, for all intents and purposes, nothing that builds something.

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
  5. Re:It must just be me by geomon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess that depends on where you reside at the time of slashdotting: red shifted in anger as the server admin, or blue shifted as the sad slashreader who never got to see the original article.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  6. Re:Website Mistake. by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No matter, their server went down faster than desperate prom date and the google cache is only from the previous edition so we can't see it anyway. Just like the real thing! :)

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  7. Top-Less Quark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It is the closest most will ever get to 'seeing' a top quark.

    What about seeing a "top-less" quark?

    1. Re:Top-Less Quark! by direwulf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Armin Shimmerman without a shirt on...sounds like the beginning to a twisted holosuite program left on the DS9 cutting room floor.

  8. Let's see... by Richy_T · · Score: 4, Funny

    Physical diagram basics

    Electron: Draw small circle with minus sign in it.

    Proton: Draw small but slightly larger circle with plus sign in it.

    Quark: Fire up raytracing software. For hardcopy, be sure to have a color printer handy.

    So much for back-of-a-napkin physics.

    Rich

    1. Re:Let's see... by neocrono · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you can't accurately and easily render a volumetric superquadratic ellipsoid with specific parameters on the back of a napkin, maybe you shouldn't be in the field of physics in the first place. Nobody said it was going to be all fun and games.

      The times, they are a-changin'.



      (got sarcasm?)

  9. Schroedinger's Sever by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone opened the box. It's dead.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  10. Re:Website Mistake. by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh dear, it's the Heisenberg Slashdotting Principle.

  11. Have to say it... by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 3, Funny
    Any art collection with pieces like "Higgs Field 3 (Interaction with third generation fermions), ink on canvas, 42x56" is just freaking cool.

    Sure beats, "Man on a chair" in my book any day.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
  12. "Most"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Funny

    > It is the closest most will ever get to 'seeing' a top quark.

    You figure there is some means whereby some will get closer?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  13. Re:why visual? why not auditory, smell, touch, etc by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder what these quarks sound like, smell like, or feel like.

    Based on the universal poultry constant, the answer is intuitively Chicken.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  14. Symmetry by JeiFuRi · · Score: 2, Funny

    So if its symmetry magazine, does that mean that it prints twice as much pages as it normally would?

  15. Photons... by Johnno74 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahhh so THATS what a photon looks like. I hadn't seen one before.

  16. Re:It must just be me by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

    You guys are all funny.
    All you had to do was look at it from a different point in time-space. It is now a day later and the server and images are fine.

    Next time try not to be so three-dimensional.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.