Gmail Becomes Google Mail in the UK
akadruid writes "As of today, UK Gmail users are seeing 'Google Mail' at the top of their Gmail accounts, and Google is warning they may lose their '@gmail.com' addresses in the future. All new signups from the UK will be assigned '@googlemail.com' addresses, and existing accounts will be able to use either domain for now. Gmail's help pages explain this is related to their ongoing dispute regarding the Gmail trademark."
Anyone else confused by the FAQ? Q4 and Q5 are the same ("What if I'm a UK user who already has a Gmail address?") but the answer is different! Am I missing something? ....
I hear they wanted 25 million GBP (over $40 million) for the gmail name in the UK.
Did they trademark 'BlackMail' too?
Jolyon
Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
> Google should have checked this stuff out before rolling aout the name around the
> world.
They're not rolling it out - Gmail is still in beta.
quick google search (heh) turned up this:
3 394361
5 97,1568223,00.html?gusrc=rss
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/
suggesting that a bunch of people attempted to register gmail as a trademark at the same time back in march/april 2004, including google who were a bit slow off the bat. this applies in the US and i assume it's been resolved, anybody?
as for the uk this guardian article
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/news/0,12
suggests that the company registered it waaaay back in 2002, therefore not qualifying for bandwaggoning and actually probably having a legit claim.
If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
Anyone who's still unconvinced that this is fully transparent,
dig mx gmail.com
dig mx googlemail.com
"BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
Now, just because they registered first doesn't mean that another company wasn't already using it as a de facto trade mark, but it does occur to me that the value of the mark should be determined by what it was before Google started using it, not what it's worth now. That the other claimant has a total market value of £3.24m ($5.6m) should be an indication that the GMail mark isn't worth "$48m to $64m" as they claim.
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
When I signed up for Hotmail, I entered my country as 'Pakistan', since I didn't think it was Microsoft's business what country I'm from/in. Also, I don't live in the country I'm from, so it's pretty much meaningless anyway.
But lo and behold, when Hotmail upped their storage to 250MB, my account stayed at 2.5MB (later upped to 25MB). Why? Because I'm not in the USA. Do you think changing my profile to USA upped the limit? Hint - the answer is not yes.
Yes, I know Hotmail != Gmail, but the point is that initial profile choices can have unintended consequences...
A house divided against itself cannot stand.
More information here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4354954.stm. The company (International Investment Research) has some stupid button that says gmail on an app, and then decided to get it registered after google came out with gmail. The company is only worth $5.6 Million anyways. I hope google decides to just do a hostile takeover (they are publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange) and then fire the dumbasses and their legal team for being conniving assholes.
--ngoy