Slashdot Mirror


Gmail Becomes Google Mail in the UK

akadruid writes "As of today, UK Gmail users are seeing 'Google Mail' at the top of their Gmail accounts, and Google is warning they may lose their '@gmail.com' addresses in the future. All new signups from the UK will be assigned '@googlemail.com' addresses, and existing accounts will be able to use either domain for now. Gmail's help pages explain this is related to their ongoing dispute regarding the Gmail trademark."

36 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. FAQ-ing confusing by eyeoftheidol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone else confused by the FAQ? Q4 and Q5 are the same ("What if I'm a UK user who already has a Gmail address?") but the answer is different! Am I missing something? ....

    1. Re:FAQ-ing confusing by bedroll · · Score: 4, Informative
      Q4:
      What if I'm a UK user who already has a Gmail address? Will that address ever change?
      Unfortunately, we don't know. We would love to say that your address will always remain the same. But the trademark issue is still unsettled, and unfortunately, we cannot predict what the other party or the courts might do here. You can always use your same username with an @googlemail.com address to avoid this issue later on. But trust that we will do the best we can to make sure your email address won't ever have to change.

      Translation: They cannot guarantee that your address won't change if you have an existing account and are allowed to continue using the gmail.com domain.

      Q5:

      What if I'm a UK user who already has a Gmail address? Will I also need to change that address?
      No, this change doesn't affect existing Gmail addresses. For now, our plan is only to issue @googlemail.com addresses to new users. Trust that we will do the best we can to offer all our users a reliable and consistent email experience.

      Translation: You don't need to change your address right now if you have an existing account that is allowed to use the gmail.com domain. New accounts will not be issued gmail.com email addresses, in favor of googlemail.com.

      They are very close, but there's just enough difference to make them both valuable questions and answers.

  2. I work internationally by danormsby · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So I can pretend I'm not from the UK to avoid the issue? Sure I registered in the UK but I work all over the world. I'm working in Sweden this week. If I leave a proxy running out here and connect through that will I keep my gmail address?

    I didn't know Google even kept a geographical address for my gmail account. Doesn't appear when I search for it!

    --
    Omnis amans amens
    1. Re:I work internationally by geoffspear · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Unless a UK court issues a decision against Google that also requires everyone else in the world to switch from the current DNS system to one that will easily allow Google to own the "gmail.com" domain everywhere except the UK and someone else to use it inside the UK, then yes, having them stop using the domain in the UK will probably mean they stop using it everywhere.

      I imagine the change now in the UK has a lot more to do with their right to market their service in the UK as "Gmail", rather than any anticipated future technical problems with using "gmail" in their URL.

      On the other hand, it's been quite some time since they started redirecting any web traffic from gmail.com to mail.google.com, so it is possible they're expecting to lose the domain altogether. But if so, it seems foolish to keep giving non-UK users new gmail.com addresses.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:I work internationally by itsme1234 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're been doing this redirection for a long time now, the reason is that they can give you a "google.com" cookie and track you accross services (for better or worse).

  3. IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 3, Informative

    They were using it for a web-mail application targetted at investors in currency derivatives. Since that was 3 years ago and they have a business around it I would hardly call them freeloaders.

    Google should have checked this stuff out before rolling aout the name around the world.

    1. Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 by Threni · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Google should have checked this stuff out before rolling aout the name around the
      > world.

      They're not rolling it out - Gmail is still in beta.

    2. Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to the BBC IIIR did not already own the TM before Google announced their version of Gmail:

      After Google announced its Gmail plans in spring 2004, IIIR rushed to register the Gmail trademark with Ohim, the European Union's trademark office, and the US Patent and Trademark Office.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    3. Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 by fabs64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes because checking that there is no trademark violations for EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD is completely feasible.

      Welcome to the Internet, sometimes things here are grey.

    4. Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is the difference between TM and (r), you know?

      You're right, of course. I really wanted to respond to the statement that Google were at fault for not checking for already-existing trademarks. I could be wrong - please correct me if so - but it must be trickier to check for unregistered trademarks.

      I'm not saying Google should get their own way, but it may not be entirely their fault that this situation arose.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  4. It's nice to see this by Kawahee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much as I think people are going to hate it and find it inconvenient, it's nice to see Google handling this without any backstabbing and lawyers and the like. Unlike Microsoft which is going to muscle the "Windows Vista" name through IPO despite the fact that "Vista Windows" and "Vista Blinds" already have a very similiar name registered, and their office is just down the adjoining road from 1 Microsoft Way.

    --
    I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
  5. Hmmm... by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear they wanted 25 million GBP (over $40 million) for the gmail name in the UK.

    Did they trademark 'BlackMail' too?

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  6. So much for by w.p.richardson · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Archive, don't delete"...

    Kind of a moot point when you lose the email address.

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

  7. Abbreviation by notthe9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really don't see why the gmail.com URL cannot just be an abbreviation of the name of the service: Google Mail. If this company wanted gmail.com, they should have bought it. They did not, leaving it up to any kind of service to legally use it with their own, non-infringing service.

  8. Is Google String in the pipeline??? by jkrise · · Score: 3, Funny

    Time to trademark G-string...
    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  9. links and background info by cyclomedia · · Score: 5, Informative

    quick google search (heh) turned up this:

    http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3 394361

    suggesting that a bunch of people attempted to register gmail as a trademark at the same time back in march/april 2004, including google who were a bit slow off the bat. this applies in the US and i assume it's been resolved, anybody?

    as for the uk this guardian article

    http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/news/0,125 97,1568223,00.html?gusrc=rss

    suggests that the company registered it waaaay back in 2002, therefore not qualifying for bandwaggoning and actually probably having a legit claim.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  10. No problem at all (for now) by xtracto · · Score: 3, Informative

    I read the article from BBC news before this morning. It seems they have lost against IIIR, who wanted an "exorbitant quantity of money" for the name.

    And so, this change is the second one (after they changed the name in Germany). It seems this company (IIIR) thought of a "great" plan to make money uh?

    Anyway, from the article and Gmail site, current users do not have anything to fear, and of course you can always change your country location when you sign up and get an actual gmail account.

    On a side note, I guess 90% of pepople on slashdot already knew that, as they certainly have gmail...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  11. Re:I hate these freeloaders by bodger_uk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any large corporation would / should search before they use a name. Given that the German company had a TM registration application in 2000 and the UK company has been providing service under that name since 99 then opportunism does not come into it. It is likely that they raised objections as soon as Google launched their service but it has only just come to a head and been made public. Maybe if Google had used a well known search engine before launch it would have shown the name already in use.

  12. Re:I hate these freeloaders by gilesparsons · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think they're trying to cash in; rather, they registered the name a couple of years before google started using it, and it would have been far more sensible for google to examine the international legal status of the trademark before launching it. the guardian ran a story about it a month ago: http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,156 8222,00.html?gusrc=rss

  13. Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Google obviously thinks they are going to win this case or else wouldn't they want to extend googlemail to all sections of the globe?
    They've already done so. Email sent to username@googlemail.com will be delivered to username@gmail.com, regardless of where the account owner lives. If you have an existing GMail account, try sending yourself an email at username@googlemail.com. You'll get the message.

    Anyone who's still unconvinced that this is fully transparent,

    dig mx gmail.com
    dig mx googlemail.com
    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  14. Thankfully... by cianduffy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google understands the difference between the UK and Ireland, meaning I get to keep a gmail.com addy even if the UK is made go to googlemail.com

    Unlike Microsoft, who now offer you a hotmail.co.uk adress if you say you're in Ireland.

  15. No more changing your email by alexo · · Score: 3, Insightful


    > I'd hate to have to go to all the websites I visit and change my stored address AGAIN...
    > when this time I wouldn't be getting anything new for all the bother


    Given the rock bottom prices of domain names nowadays, you should never have to change your email address again.

    1. Re:No more changing your email by Armour+Hotdog · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you don't want to bother creating/deleting emails in your own domain (or for those without personal domains), I've found these services to be very useful for this sort of thing:

      http://www.spamgourmet.com/
      http://www.sneakemail.com/
      http://www.mailinator.com/

  16. Other company has had an email service since 2002 by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are using it for an email service already and have done since 2002. They don't have millions of users but I don't think that should matter as long as they do (and did) provide a viable email service of the same name.

  17. Privacy issues? by zonix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmm. If Google have to give up gmail.com, then whoever gets the domain instead would be able to receive a shit load of people's private e-mails?

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Privacy issues? by generic-man · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's okay. All the really important e-mail has a disclaimer at the bottom noting that it is for the intended recipients only. That makes it illegal for another person to read it. If another person reads it, they have to notify the sender and delete the message.

      /me takes tongue out of cheek

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Privacy issues? by fabs64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amazingly enough there's not yet a response saying "NO".
      Google still own the "gmail.com" domain, whether another company owns the trademark in the UK or not, mail addressed to @gmail.com will still end up at a google server.

  18. The trademark registrations by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Show Google filing 6 months before anyone else in the UK.

    Now, just because they registered first doesn't mean that another company wasn't already using it as a de facto trade mark, but it does occur to me that the value of the mark should be determined by what it was before Google started using it, not what it's worth now. That the other claimant has a total market value of £3.24m ($5.6m) should be an indication that the GMail mark isn't worth "$48m to $64m" as they claim.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  19. I actually prefer @googlemail.com by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually prefer @googlemail.com. Firstly, every time I say @gmail.com over the phone or even in person to someone, half the time they hear @email.com, and I have to repeat myself. Plus, I suspect @googlemail.com will be much easier to remember, since most people I know (who have email) recognize the google name. Since it seems anything to @googlemail.com will be redirected to @gmail.com (or they are the same, whatever), I'll start using @googlemail.com from now on in my documents and conversations.

    --
    Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
  20. Will I keep my username? by mark2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe I haven't read this properly but I can't find explicitly stated anywhere that I will be able to keep my username after the change from @gmail to @googlemail - i.e. if I have xyz@gmail.com will they reserve xyz@googlemail.com for me?

    I have a really common name and getting a user name that was remotely like my real name was only possible by getting hold of an invite right at the start. I'll be really pissed off if someone else can swipe it. I've tried opening another account with myname@googlemail.com and it is not available - hopefully this indicates that they have reserved it for me.

  21. Re:@googlemail.com address may be a collector's it by Xarius · · Score: 3, Informative

    Every person with a gmail account has a googlemail.com address anyway.

    --
    C17H21NO4
  22. Re:So, who... by VJ42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here you go: http://www.iirgroup.com/
    From the contact page
    Independent International Investment Research PLC
    Head & Regestered Office
    30 City Bussiness centre
    St Olav's court
    Lower Road
    London
    SE16 2XB

    Email:salesinfo@iirgroup.com
    tel: +44(0)20 7232 3090
    fax: +44(0)20 7232 3099

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  23. Double-edged sword by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I signed up for Hotmail, I entered my country as 'Pakistan', since I didn't think it was Microsoft's business what country I'm from/in. Also, I don't live in the country I'm from, so it's pretty much meaningless anyway.

    But lo and behold, when Hotmail upped their storage to 250MB, my account stayed at 2.5MB (later upped to 25MB). Why? Because I'm not in the USA. Do you think changing my profile to USA upped the limit? Hint - the answer is not yes.

    Yes, I know Hotmail != Gmail, but the point is that initial profile choices can have unintended consequences...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  24. Re:Yep by ngoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    More information here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4354954.stm. The company (International Investment Research) has some stupid button that says gmail on an app, and then decided to get it registered after google came out with gmail. The company is only worth $5.6 Million anyways. I hope google decides to just do a hostile takeover (they are publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange) and then fire the dumbasses and their legal team for being conniving assholes.

    --
    --ngoy
  25. Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts by tehshen · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you have an existing GMail account, try sending yourself an email at username@googlemail.com. You'll get the message.

    Keep quiet about it, I'm trying to get people to buy all the new special GoogleMail invites I have

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  26. Re:Yep by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And that's why Gmail still says "BETA" at the top.

    How on Earth did this get modded insightful? Not only is this just regurgitating the same thing people say every time we talk about Google products on Slashdot, but it doesn't even make sense on this one! Gmail is still in Beta because of trademark disputes? Huh?

    --
    Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions