Slashdot Mirror
Eight Year Old Physics Student Admitted to College
paris writes to tell us that The Korea Herald is running a story about Song Yoo-guen, the youngest university student that Korea has ever seen. At eight years old Song is already talking about building flying cars and defying Newton's law of gravity while others his age are attending the first grade. He completed his elementary, junior-high, and high school curricula in just nine months, something that usually takes 12 years, and has been admitted as a freshman to the physics department of Inha University.
Although this is a great opportunity for him, Kids at that age have a lot of development ahead of them and jumping right into college might hinder some social growth
So much for letting the kid grow up.
I really hate it when kids rush through their education. What some people don't realize is school is just as much about growing maturity as it is about growing the mind. Yeah, this kid may be smarter than the average college student, but he is going to miss important aspects of life like having friends and interacting with other people his age, which is arguably more important than college.
Actually, at least in America, this could be a bad thing. There is a lot of experience you gain and a lot of things you learn about friendships, daily life, and relationships that is only obtainable by going through what everyone else goes through.
Not that I don't think that it is awesome that he is a prodigy as such, but will he not be lacking a lot of "street smarts?"
I know, spelling and grammer...
Hang on, explaining or regurgitating what his parents told him? All this smacks of publicity stunt... both for the anxious parents (it'll help junior in our hyper-competitive society) and a middling Korean university (at best).
> Too bad he's not involving himself figuring out how to make 50% efficient solar panels..
> with him on the darpa team, they could probably be making these panels for $1.00 within
> 3 years. Good luck to him though.
One could always hope, but so far he has only proven that he is extremely good at absorbing and using existing knowledge.
Whether he will also be able to come up with new insight and fresh solutions remains to be seen. One can always hope of course!
(Noticed how I tried really hard to avoid the word "innovate"... and failed in the end of course).
I'm sorry, but I can't help but wonder how screwed up this kid will be at oh, say age 25 or so. One of the most important things my parents did for me when I was young was prevent my school district from having me skip... well, about 10 grades. Not as fast as this child, but nonetheless.
The reason? Simply that there are other things in life besides simply rushing through academics. There are issues which can't be handled simply from an academic perspective-- each day the engineers among us solve some new problem while thinking "outside the box," and this kid won't be able to do that. Because he doesn't have an "outside," he has what he's learned in books.
So I'm of mixed feelings on this one: on one hand, I'm happy for him, because he obviously has great potential, and parents that support him.
On the other hand, the best superstring theorists in the world, can't work for more than a few, perhaps 5 at a stretch, years from their start at that level. They simply burn out, every one. So if at 14, this kid's entirely burnt out... will it have been worth it?
I talked about building flying cars at the age of 6. In fact, I built one. It amazing what legos and some good old childhood imagination can do.
"The interview was conducted mainly with the senior Song since Yoo-geun is lacking in his ability to communicate with adults."
Something tells me that he might no be ready for college just yet. . .
Languages - well , the whole language can be broken down in 1 4hr lesson into a massive 1 foot sized flow chart and rules, the rest are just like learning C++, all the verbs and nouns and functions.
I don't know what your C++ coding is like, but as a person who has learned three additional (natural) languages, I can say that learning to speak a foreign language is not just about technical grammar. Pronunciation, syllable stress, and most importantly understanding colloquial meaning or implied meaning play a major role. These things are not so easily expressed as a flow chart.
I feel pretty bad for this kid. After all, he will never have a normal life. I've known a genius who burnt out and worked a crappy job. I'm not saying that will happen with this kid, but I fear that there is a strong chance that he will crack at some point. Imagine living your whole life around people who are so much "slower" than you that they might as well be retarded for all intents and purposes. He will likely relate to adults better than kids, which is going to be hard because so many will envy him. There will be many who are threatened by his precociousness. Think of Good Will Hunting x 20. He will never know what it is to have a normal life and that may cause him to envy "normal" people to an extent. That being said, I really hope he does well and can find a good core group of people who will guide him and treat him well. This kind of makes me think that reincarnation truly happens....
This feat has been accomplished before. Children of only average intelligence, if they are drilled at early enough age, can master the basic GED curriculum by eight years old. They tend not to do well in university however as they usually have not developed the abilty to think critically and independantly. A teenager coming up with a nobel prize worthy idea is a prodigy. An eight year old who gets into university is just an example of a yet to be identified form of child abuse.
It's not going to matter if he went to college or rotted in school with kids his age. The fact is he's too smart to be with them as they can't relate to what he's talking about, so he's going to be messed up either way. Better not to stifle his mind let him talk to some people who can communicate with him about some things and get him a good shrink to keep him from going nuts. Hopefully, his social skills won't suck and he can learn some hobbies that he can share with people his one age as he gets older.
He is a specialist. Mastering Physics is no doubt the best choice. But how do these kids fair say when they are 20 or more ? Do they really go ahead and get a P.hd ? I have known some extremely bright students in high school now flipping burgers. I don't know what happened to them but they derailed.
eBay Sucks!
Being socially well adjusted is overrated.
Tell that to the misanthropic whiz-kids--even us mundane ones who can correct our physics professors but can't get a goddamn date.
I'm sorry, but in what parallel dimension do they teach maturity in the school system?
In all the schools I went to, the clique-ized and institutionalized immaturity was actively supported by the teaching staff that openly favored the "popular" kids. The end result when this cancer has fully metastasized is national news stories of the football team stuffing foriegn object up the asses of other students while the coach looks on approvingly. Google on "mepham high football". And that's the best case. Worst case is Columbine.
Maybe that's teaching about the real world, but don't you dare call it maturity.
He's only 8. Barring disaster, he's got plenty of time.
I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
William Sidis
Of all the prodigies for which there are records, his was probably the most powerful intellect of all. And yet it all came to nothing. He soon gave up his position as a professor, and for the rest of his life wandered from one menial job to another. His experiences as a child prodigy had proven so painful that he decided for the rest of his life to shun public exposure at all costs. Henceforth, he denied his gifts, refused to think about mathematics, and above all refused to perform as he had been made to do as a child. Instead, he devoted his intellect almost exclusively to the collection of streetcar transfers, and to the study of the history of his native Boston.
This article about gifted children was published on the Prometheus Society website. I'm not a member of that society, but another one with a high level of exclusivity (much higher than Mensa). It's as much a support group as it is anything else, because children with this "gift" are often brought up in ways that are quite harmful to them. I certainly was not the prodigy that this child was, or that William Sidis was, so I can't say that I know what it's like to be a child like that, but from everything that I can tell in this group, putting a child into college at age 8 is wrong in every way. My childhood was bad enough, I can't imagine how awful it will be for this little boy.
Donate free food here
Too bad he's not involving himself figuring out how to make 50% efficient solar panels.. with him on the darpa team, they could probably be making these panels for $1.00 within 3 years.
DARPA is great, but string theory, should it prove true, would be much more important than DARPA or anything the Pentagon is working on, at least as far as science goes.
That said, I'd really like to know how string theory could be applied to cars. I'm not an expert by any means, but I've read The Elegant Universe and so forth, and I think there are at least two big hurdles before this kid even has a chance with his idea. 1) There is no experimental evidence to support string theory, so we don't even know if it's true yet. 2) If he can make flying cars using string theory, that implies that these cars would serve as experimental evidence for it. Why is he already jumping from "something that might be true" to "let's start an engineering project with it?" So, if he has some magic that he can pull out of his hat, great let's hear it, but somehow I doubt that this will happen any time soon.
I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
I completely agree. Did you read any big scientist's biography that says he finished school in 8 months or whatever? Nah.
What about Einstein? He was a mediocre student. His biggest quality was his immagination. I think that immagination and love for science developed in time because he was allowed the normal growth rate. Now I know this kid loves science, but, is he more that just a computer? I mean learning, drawing conclusions, these are more or less mechanical. A sufficiently advanced AI can do theese things. I wonder if he has immagination. I hope so. It would be a benefit to humanity.
It's a good point, the difference between intelligence and wisdom. It's relatively easy to learn something, even Schrodinger's equation. It's far more difficult to try and explain the implications, or to formulate your own perspective. Breakthroughs in knowledge come from experience and creating your own version of the universe, not what is taught.
D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.
Being a genius, doesn't mean you're happy, or have a happy life, or even that you can choose your life. Did this kid really choose to be sent to college at age 8? What other choices will be made, in order to "optimize his future possibilities"? Rich people usually have the greatest debts. It's really amazing how paradoxial the world is..
This is why envy does no good to a man, it only makes you drop your innocence and thus happiness. Envy can happen to this boy, as well as his peers, leaving all of them ravaged. Or the opposite might happen, which would be truly great.
The real geniuses I admire are those who can be happy while contributing to the benefit of all. That has nothing to do with the type of IQ or school grades being measured by scientists, yet.
http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/
Because most people are heterosexual by a large margin. Much like how people refer to individuals on Slashdot as male, without checking to see if they are or not, because most posters on Slashdot are male.
Oh no, it's a big prejudicial conspiracy. Down with the gays! Grrr! Gay!
Grow up, please.
The. Kid. Is. Eight.
For his own sake, I do hope he's had no chance yet to discover he's either straight or gay or anything else of the sort.
(Luckily for him, he's probably not Catholic.)
Besides, it was a joke. Not all blondes are stupid, either.
I'll even daresay not all Macintosh fans are gay, despite the abundant evidence to the contrary.
Sheesh.
Ignore this signature. By order.
I heard that his father had quit his job so that he could help his son studying (or whatever). I don't know but it seems he isn't a total publicity whore after all. Good for him? That I'm not sure. (If there's nothing I can do to protect the kid, at least I can hope his family get some money)
From the article: "While other children his age are first graders at elementary school, he is a freshman at the Physics Department of Inha University in Incheon, west of Seoul."
/. for it... It would be rather hard to spot such a mistake for someone not familiar with the Korean school system.
If that's wrong (I don't know), there's no point in blaming
I took a course in BS Physics and I had a classmate like that. He entered University at the age of 10 direct from grade 5. His teachers noticed him sleeping most of the time in classes but when tested he knew more than his teachers. He was accelerated to a special science high school for above-average kids but after 6 months his teachers told his parents that they have nothing more to teach him. He was then sent directly to university where he was enrolled in the BS Math, BS Physics and MS Physics courses at the same time! He is good! He can compute sines and cosines in his head and can sum a taylor series without writing anything down. When he became my lab mate, we would use him as a calculator because he can compute much faster than our electronic calculators. During the time spent entering numbers on the calculator he would be able to tell us the results. We just decided to call out the numbers to him rather than have the calculator do it for us. He is a walking calculator. That was more than twenty years ago. Ever since graduating from university I have sought to find out if he has somehow made a significant contribution to physics commensurate with his abilities. After scouring newspapers and the university newsletters, I have found none. It was a disappointment. I don't know if going to university at such an early age was the right thing he did. Obviously, he was far too advanced to stay in grade 5. However, I doubt it if being forced to study in the university at his age was the right approach. He was interviewed by a newspaper once when he was my classmate. He was asked how he felt about being accelerated from grade 5 to university in less than a year. I can't forget what he said in the interview. He said he felt lonely because he has no friends in the university. All the others guys want to talk about is their girlfriends while all he wanted to do was build a paper airplane and sail it across the classroom.
Usually the news blows this out of proportion. Remember that Sarah chick from Ireland that was a "crypto prodigy"? Yeah, she fell off the radar something hard. Never published, never pokes up in discussion forums, etc.
It isn't because she's stupid or something. It's because she had a high school project and the news blew it up to something it wasn't. It was just that. She heard of RSA and thought "this would be neat". Her idea didn't work out in the end but it was still an intelligent project none the less.
Chances are this kid is doing the bare minimum to pass exams or something and when you actually ask him to solve a problem not listed in the textbooks he'll get stumped. It takes a very short time to memorize data, it takes longer to form the patterns in the brain to be able to manipulate the data.
So the reason you don't hear about them in the future is because they end up fluttering into "blandness". He'll get his degree at age 12 or whatever and it'll take him 20 years to actually know what to do with the knowledge.
And I'm not trying to shoot down these people. I just hate how the media focuses on all the wrong qualities and blows things way out of proportion....
Tom
Someday, I'll have a real sig.
I *was* one of those 8 year olds in college. Feel a little sorry for him, 'cause he's caught in a hard place: as someone else observed, he will stand out and have to deal with all sorts of issues in his college as a result; on the other hand, it's not like he can have anything like a normal life in a normal school, either.
But if his experience is anything like mine, he's *not* regurgitating --- which if you think about it woulldn't work anyway. (Think about the Chinese Room Problem.) If he can "regurgitate" well enough to read what he needs to read, answer questions, and pass tests, how is that *different* from having "really" learned it?
99.5%+ and you can't even spell "colleagues" correctly?
From a young age, Einstein loved to play the violin. He was never really good at it, however, and one might imagine what it would have been like for the brilliant mind of this child to be challenged by a piece of wood and catgut. Though I'm no scholar of Einstein's life, I'm sure that somewhere in-between skipping school to play the violin and the various odd jobs he took before becoming a physicist, he learned the value of failure, a crucial skill for anyone who aspires to be someone great.
Unfortunately, this kid will probably be forced to study what he's good at and will never be challenged to learn anything else. Seeing how the adults in his life are treating him, as if raising him with latex gloves, I doubt he's been pushed into an area of study where he'd be bound to fail. Then, one wonders, what will happen when he reaches his mental limit? I fear he will crash and burn.
Since nobody's taken the time to question the kid for days on end, how does the Chinese Room apply here? The kid's supposed to be a genius in physics, so his parents stuffed him full of random physics facts. It's not that far-fetched. And the fact that he wants to join CERN "to learn how to apply superstring theory to flying cars" sorta proves that he really has no idea what it actually means to study physics. Yes, he gave a nice prettied up version of the definition of anti-gravity, but all the kid really said was, "I want to make cars float, even though gravity is pulling on them".
Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
The Urban Hippie
Being socially well adjusted is overrated.
FUCK YOU!
Oh, don't take it personally. I say that to everyone.
-
- - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
I agree with you... to a point. Sure, the public school system--and I assume you're referring to the U.S. system--teaches to the lowest common denominator.
High school kids, including and especially those at "underprivileged" inner city schools, have repeatedly said in study after study that they want to be challenged more.
This attitude flies in the face of the education establishment's approach which is to simply tread water, maintain discipline, try to get kids to behave and be regimented so that they will be able to "fit in" in the job market, try to ensure they have learned their basic literacy skills.
There's also the little issue of teachers' rights; teacher unions have as their priorities their pay, their working conditions, and their seniority. By their nature they care precious little about their productivity, which is so crucial to the future of our country.
Of course, the teachers blame parents, and we must face facts: American parents suck. They are more interested in seeing their kids win accolades and Little League games, whether honestly or underhandedly--it's winning that counts, not how you play the game. The extreme expression of this is the Blair Hornstine case (2003) in which a supposedly overachieving girl was denied "sole" valedictorian spot at her high school, and her parents sued.
What's the solution? Well, this Korean boy is a total anomaly in an educational system even more regimented than ours, and there are many cases of children skipping right to college in the U.S. When I lived in Taiwan in the early 80s, there was a front page news story about a 12-year-old Taiwan-born boy who graduated from Carnegie-Mellon Univ., the youngest person to receive a degree from that school and one of the youngest anywhere. The Taiwanese noted that probably, had his parents not emigrated to the U.S., he would not have been allowed to progress so quickly in their very rigid system.
I believe that we need to harness the things that make our system great--the flexibility, the allowance for creativity and self-expression, and at the same time reintroduce some discipline and high academic standards to both challenge the kids and give them greater self-respect. No one benefits from sailing through school; it's the challenges that make us grow and develop properly.
it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
Searle's "Chinese Room" thought experiment doesn't seem to support your point. The idea Searle attempts to explain isn't that there's no difference between regurgitating information, and actually understanding it. Indeed many of the arguments against AI claim that 'only' machines that externally demonstrate intelligence, but lack a conscious mind, and an ability to actually understand that information, can exist. It's precisely this that Searle tries to demonstrate in his experiment--- the exact opposite of what you seem to be relying on.
t y.html.
;).
Just for an example of how a machine could 'regurgitate' a highly articulate explanation of a certain problem vist: http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/relativi
It seems that my computer can offer a good explanation for a myriad of differing problems, but, I still doubt that there isn't any difference between this and understanding those problems.
The Turing experiment, I believe would support your opinion. Turing's major claim is that if you, as a third party observer, couldn't tell the difference between a computer and a human through blind dialog--- then that computer is intelligent. For one, this test judges intelligence through how well a machine relates to our particular brand of social interaction. It doesn't seem fair to say that something isn't intelligent if it's incapable of human communication. If an intelligent alien species that communicated through beams of light, or sonar, were to analyze our species this way, we would quickly be determined not to demonstrate intelligence. It also heavily relies on the social and conversational abilities of the judge in the situation. Many template based bots, whom most people would agree are not intelligent, have tricked judges into believing they're intelligent. An entertaining programming pass time involves creating bots and attempting to fool random individuals into having deep personal conversations with them. In the end Turing's method seems too subjective, and it doesn't seem entirely logical. It isn't apparent that a machine that only seems to be intelligent can't exist, and I would assume this could also be true for human beings
John Searle argued against this using a parody of the Turing Experiment, the "Chinese Room" experiment. This thought experiment involves an intelligent human being, interacting with the outside world via a proxy of a limited symbolic interface. Through this interface he can place answers to given questions in the Chinese language by following a complicated program, or rule book, without understanding a word of Chinese. In essence, he claims to have crated a machine incapable of ever being intentional. His second claim is that no rule book exists that would allow you to, as the operator, to understand Chinese.
While I agree with Daniel Dennett that this is just intellectual sleight of hand, and in the end Searle's experiment makes several logical errors that fail to prove that intelligent machines can not exist; I don't believe it either proves, or disproves, the possibility of zombie machines existing.
24/7/365
If something is 24/7, how does adding the 365 make it more so? And what about leap years? Does 24/7/365 skip a day every four years?
<pet peave...>
- - - - - - - - - - -
I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
You know, I had a chance to start College at age 14, not quite 8, but still. I'm really glad I didn't take it.
Sure, highschool sucked. But highschool sucked for a whole lotta people. I read a lot on my own time, and I don't think humanity was deprived of any potential fruits of my intellect while I was spending my efforts avoiding football games and vainly attempting to figure out how to talk to girls.
When I started college at the normal age, I had a blast and did well academically.
I remember reading an article about what prodigies were up to 20 years later (looking at what happened to a bunch of kids who'd gone into college before puberty, which apparently there was a rash of in the 70s) and none of them were doing anything *that* earth-shaking. All smart men and women, sure, but no nobel prizes.
Think of it this way: You're a professor starting a new research project. Which early PhD student do you want to be your research assistant, the 24 year old with an apartment and a settled life, or some kid who'se just started the roughest years of puberty? They both have the same amount of education, and the kid is way more impressive *for his age* but what the hell do you care about someone being impressive for their age? You want work to get done. I really suspect this kind of thing happens more to stoke parental egos than anything else. It just doesn't make that much sense to get so far off of the clock that your society expects of you.
There are a whole lot of square pegs out there, and the standard education system is nothing but round holes. Some parents give their kids pills or push them onto the chearleading team in order to make them round pegs. Some parents look around frantically for square holes for their precious square pegs. I personally am a big believer in the value of spending a few years getting whacked in the head by a hammer as society tries to cram you down the damn round hole. The adult world isn't that much different, and you learn to deal with it without developing a massive ego or the belief that nothing is right if it doesn't feel like a special magical little cradle created just for unique little you.
In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
While he obviously didn't go on to fully utilize his talent, I severely doub it's because his gift was nutured. His reclusiveness was inspired mostly because of sever criticism from the media who constantly belittled him; equating his gifts to rote memorization and obsessive cramming, something that his parents had set out to discourage in their child.
Even with all that in mind, I wouldn't necessarily call him a failure. For the most part it was a combination of being too ahead of his time and society in general not being receptive enough to him. He postulated the existence of black holes before anyone else, pioneered the establishment of modern libertarianism, and developed methods of improving public transportation that are only now gaining acceptance. In relation to how incredibly gifted it was it's obviously a huge waste, but not for the reason you're implying. Not because he had an "abnormal social development," but because of distrust and hostility in society.
The notion of the tortured child prodigy is, in my opinion, just a cliche. I don't doubt there are severe problems that are typical in the lives of these people, but it's society in general that's responsible.
My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
I think a huge problem with our education system is that most people DO adapt to its brokenness. If they're forced in the round whole, they become round and never go back, not giving any time to question "the norm" of roundedness, or question authority. Obviously you will have to submit to the norm, and put yourself in situations you may deem sub-optimal to accomodate others. But you view these situations as temporary, a necessary evil in order to be part of society.