Slashdot Mirror
Google Striking Fear into the Corporate Masses
SpectralDesign writes "The New York Times reports that Google is striking fear into the hearts of even unrelated industries. From the article: 'We watch Google very closely at Wal-Mart," said Jim Breyer, a member of Wal-Mart's board. In Google, Wal-Mart sees both a technology pioneer and the seed of a threat, said Mr. Breyer, who is also a partner in a venture capital firm. The worry is that by making information available everywhere, Google might soon be able to tell Wal-Mart shoppers if better bargains are available nearby.'"
Jim Breyer is not against monopolies, he is just against monopolies that others have. This small-minded businessman is for the right thing for the wrong reasons.
On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
nnnnnGoogle ! nnnnGoogle!
Now get me some shrubberies...
Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
Hell, I can tell you a better place to buy crap than Wally World... It's called Costco.
They don't treat their employees like EA coders, and you can still buy cheap.
I didn't even need Google for that.
-- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
funniest reason to be scared, ever.
they are saying: the cheapest on the whole world, are they lying? No, it's simply not possible
btw, castorama (like wal-mart in europe, but smaller and focuses only on things that people may use when building/renoving a house) gives warranty on their prices. Their ad is: "if you find this thing cheaper anywhere, we will return to you the price difference". I've never tried if this actually works.
#
#\ @ ? Colonize Mars
#
unlikely...
cheaper than walmart online? yeah, but it's not just froogle that lets us find that out.
sig.
Search and replace "Google" with "a cute little elephant" in the above text and you'll see what I mean.
Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
Is Walmart supposed to have the better prices... Always ;)
If this were kindergarten, they'd be given time-out to stare at a wall. I'm not going to suggest that there's any conspiracy with Microsoft pulling some wal-mart puppet strings, so I'll just some other paranoid poster take care of that.
Yes, Google will tell you if there is cheaper somewhere else but it will also bring you customers if your offer is the cheapest. However this is not new: many services like that exist (Kelkoo), but they are limited to online shops. Google already has Froogle. The wave is reaching the mortar shops. Fine for me.
Million Dollar Screenshot
. . . so capitalism is best with perfect information. Wal*Mart no doubt would like as close to perfect information about its customers and what they might be willing to pay in a given market. But they cry foul when the tables are turned and their policies of discriminatory pricing based on region and neighboorhood might be in jeapordy. Go figure.
I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
Oh the horror, someone telling me that I might get a better price somewhere else!!!
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ COMPLAINT GENERATOR. SIMPLE.
I doubt its Walmart that should be afraid, more likely brands like Nike, Reebok and Gucci and not only that they should be afraid of the information thats out there not the search engines that find it.
..... times up.d =179
t s.asp
Let me explain:
A quick quiz:
Gucci is an Italian Fashion product maker right? Tick tock tick tock
Wrong! Gucci are an Amsterdam company that buy in practically all of their products that makes *brands* (Boucheron, Balenciaga...) they say they buy shoes from Italy, according to this guy, the Italian high-fashion shoe industry get most of the shoe from Romania and China now and as a result Italy is Europe's biggest shoe importer:
http://www.brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?i
Quiz:
Nike are a high quality manufactured brand, Reebok are a high quality manufactured brand, Pan Shoes Bangkok are some crappy Asian brand? Right or wrong, tick tock tick tock... Wrong. Bangkok Rubber company make Reeboks for Reebok, Nike's for Nike and Pan Shoes for Pan Group (which owns Bangkok Rubber Company).
http://www.pan-group.com/
CAT Footware (From Caterpillar):
http://www.catfootwear.com/Main.aspx
Cat Footware are American made and 'Authentic since **1904***' (from their website)? Correct or not?
Tick tock tick tock... Wrong.
Cat brand products are made by Wolverine World Wide.
Here is the information saying they signed up the CAT brand in ***1994***, not 1904:
http://www.wolverineworldwide.com/brands_cat.asp
Here's their annual report:
http://www.wolverineworldwide.com/investors_repor
So where are CAT brand shoes made? Read the 2004 Report, page 29.
Risk factors:
"reliance on foreign sourcing and concentration of production in China; the availability and price of power, labor and resources in key foreign sourcing countries, including China;"
Made in China.
It's not the search engines, its the information they should fear. Look at the CAT thing, I simply clicked on their financial details and did a search for 'China' to locate the information. Nothing to do with Google or Yahoo.
Just a few years ago, Google was nothing. Now entire industries are shitting their pants, because they are incapable of understanding Google's business model.
Google has become ubiquitous; They make products people want to use. And they don't even feel compelled to say "customer satisfaction is our number one priority!" on every sign, railing, and even doormat in the building.
While other companies (and even industries) are struggling to lock consumers into their own little slice of the marketing pie, they have not figured out a way to get people to stop going to google for products or services. And that scares the bejesus out of them. It's not that hard; run the business and stay in the black. Give people what they want, instead of offering them a product and telling them that they want it because you want what's best for them.
start competing with FedEx.
; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
"Sometime in the future a cute little elephant will teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate"
:(
Why must the cute little elephant be so mean?
--
Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
Wal-mart could also see a glass half FILLED with milk, Google would be able to tell customers that Wal-mart have a better deal than their competitors. That's all google can do, is spread information. It's not ever going to act by itself, it's just going to allow people to make better decisions (assuming the information is accurate).
Some customers might spend a while looking at froogle.com and find that the cheapest Speakers only cost 50 quid at Wal-mart, and that'll keep Wal-mart and the consumers happy.
Others might spend time with google.com and find the best speakers are from Genelec and buy them, keeping Genelec and the consumers happy.
More information = more informed people = less bad purchases. It can only affect Wal-mart (and others) badly if they are not offering what their target market wants.
the point is, you will have the information, and thus the choice. if the cost difference is not that much, it won't be worth it. you won't drive down the road to save $.30 on a lbs of sugar, but you might for $200 if the tv you are looking at is on sale elsewhere. a lot of shoppers like to know they are getting the best price. this will let you combine impulse shopping with bargain hunting. if walmart truly believes their prices are the lowest, they will love this.
The worry is that by making information available everywhere, Google might soon be able to tell Wal-Mart shoppers if better bargains are available nearby.
What they really should be worried about is workers finding out that other companies actually pay living wages and provide good health coverage, unlike Walmart.
maps.google.com + froggle.google.com = "She's a witch!"
Wal-Mart should look forward to this day...or do they not really have the lowest prices?
Google isn't even the leader in web-based price comparisons. This is going to happen, Google or not.
I expect the main channel of delivery in the future will be via cell phones anyway: SMS, MMS (photo of product bar code), and cell phone browser.
I guess what he doesn't like is that, for a while, there was an information imbalance between sellers and buyers, with sellers being able to use sophisticated computer systems for pricing, but buyers being left clipping coupons. Well, that imbalance is going away. That's a good thing for a market economy and capitalism. You like market economies and capitalism, right?
Google, Microsoft, Wall-Mart, Nestle... all of them are the same - they tend to grow too much. As the Nestle grown behind the Europe and Google grown behind the USA all became a real threat to small businesses in its segment... And wors think is that super-large corporations try to "diversificate" the risks by expanding (better "attacking") unrelated segments of business. :-) War of monopolies. The bad news for us: there will be less and less monopolies as the globalization expands.
;-)
Huge companies has too much money so they can buy all the important konwledge (I mean patent it) and thus prevent you from being succesfull. How you will climb up if they patented the rope and even the idea of "generic way going up"
I see google becames the same threat as microsoft is (or any other superdominant company).
Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
Dear WalMart,
Why are you so afraid that Google might tell (potential patrons that there are better prices available nearby - when you, too, could be making use of this technology ?
As soon as you spot a better price nearby, drop your prices at that location - now YOU have the better price.
Sincerely,
Common Sense
-----
Not entirely off-topic... there was a grocery store chain here in The Netherlands that would set up a mobile grocery store bus right outside a competing grocery store and let patrons of that store compare prices for the articles they had just bought by scanning the bar code. That way, they could easily tell people how much they could have saved by comparing the register stubs. More on-topic with what I wrote: *if* a product would actually have been cheaper at the store they're parked outside of, they would pass this on to corporate HQ. They, then, could issue an update to all their registers across the nation to bill that product more cheaply - the goal being to be cheaper than the competition once again.
In an ideal world, a transaction between buyer and seller would be done with full information and with satisfaction on both sides. That is, it's not a zero-sum game - the buyer gets a product they're happy with at a price they like, and the seller makes his profit.
Unfortunately, we don't live in an ideal world. The motives of companies do not always co-incide with those of the consumers. As we can see here, not only does the customer suffer from imperfect information (a market inefficiency) but the companies actively fear an increase in this information, and also actively seek to restrict the flow of information that is required to become closer to market perfection (remember the copyright arguments about the posting of special offers on third-party websites). They don't want the kind of transaction I mention above; if they think they could get away with it, they screw the customer.
What's my point? Information is *good*, and if companies attempt to mess with the market by restricting this flow of infomation, they need to be regulated until their pips squeak. We need to realise that when businesses whine about regulation restricting the market, they're usually whining because *they* want to to mess with the markets to distort them in their favour.
OK, so thats the retail environment for you. Now, you'll notice that the price discrimination is enabled by one thing: differential access to information, or the "cost of search" if you want to think of it that way. You're already assuming that the cost of search for a better deal is going to be greater than the savings you'll realize. Question: do you consider $6 an hour for boring tedium a good use of your time? Many, many millions of people whose opinions are very valuable at Wal-Mart world headquarters do. The ultimate nightmare app for Walmart would be a scanner attached to your cellphone (already widely available here in Japan) which would just scan all the items you need and tell you "Buy pickles, diapers, baby formula, and orange juice at Walmart. Go to the Jewel three minutes away for apple juice, note paper, and their 8 for the price of 3 pizza deal."
Another thing retail loves is called a loss leader -- something which is a staple, like milk, priced so low it will actively get people to come into your store, where they'll naturally buy other items which are priced higher. This works because people might know, for example, that $1.50 a gallon milk is an absurdly good deal, but putting together a list of all the items you need is very difficult, so you just get people to comparison shop on a few high-profile items and nickle-and-dime them on, say, cereal. (This is also one thing small stores LOVE to do to Wal-Mart, since it is very, very difficult to beat Wal-Mart's pricing across the board.) You can have loss-leaders which are much more expensive than milk though -- computer monitors, for example. And that + google = scare the pants off of you if you work in retail. Because it will bring people to your store for the purpose of getting the loss leader and *nothing else*. Best Buy calls these sort of customers "demons" (Google it, interesting article on the phenomenon) -- if you can exploit the information gap between you and the store you can tremendously cut into their business.
Help poke pirates in the eyepatch, arr.
What you are thinking of is Walmart trying to be stationary and not adapting to the real world. You are thinking that Walmart executives are like government employees who would just want to sit and do the same exact job for 50 years. In THAT case, you are right, Walmart would be afraid of Google, a fast-moving company, taking over Walmart, a company that just wants to be stagnant. But, that's just not true. Walmart, and any other #1 company in their field, gets their company from a $0 income a year company to a billion/year income company in no other way than by always advancing and always saying, I want my share of the pie! So, I am sure that the Corporate world is looking at Google, but not in that sense. They are thinking more along the lines of, "all that money people are investing into Google, that could be money the consumers could have spent at Walmart." In other words, big companies look at each other as competitors regardless of whether they are in the same niche or field, simply because they all want that consumer $dollar. Doesn't mean they are afraid, it just means they set goals that they want that consumer's $ to go to them and not google. Even if the 2 companies have nothing to do with each other. Finally, there are a lot of great small businesses out there, and just focusing on Google like it's a god is not fair. There is a Google story on slashdot every hour and rarely about any other company.
Cover your eyes and click this link!
However, like other companies that started on the bottom rung by being cheap, they now need to learn a new trick or become irrelevent. Walmart needs customers with money, customers that are not going to shop at a cheap place that depends on illigal immigrants and desperate mothers. Shoppers that are going to value reasonable working conditions over wide aisles.
And it is going to be hard for Walmart to keep prices low, unless they start looking at ineffeciencies in management and other overhead. These ineffeciencies, according to Forbes, is why Costco is a better company. And these ineffeciencies are why Walmart is vunerable even at the brick and mortor level. Historically a firm that competes just on price, or just on style, are not good long term prospects.There are a few national chains, like Target, that are competeing heavily on quality of life issues, and those chains will likely do better as Walmart is forced to sacrifice price to attact the more affluent customer.
Walmart has already shown no dedication to a particular community. There are empty husks of building all over the country left as Walmart moved 10 miles up the road to cheaper land. With the price of gas, we may again be reaching a point where a 5 mile trip to the safeway is better than a 10 mile trip to the walmart.
"She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
This is great for the consumer because is balances the economics further in the consumer's favor, makes true on the generality the "knowledge is power", and allows the consumer the keep the economy pumping by having more money to purchase other goods and services.
Case in point: I just purchased a Power Mac G5 with Mac OS X Tiger on it. I downloaded a slew of Dashboard Widgets from Apple's website, one of the more important ones being "GAS". By typing my zip code and specifying a radius in miles/km around the zip code, I can locate the lowest price gasoline in the immediate area. If I happen to be going in a particular direction, or the price is so ridiculously low, I will go out of my way to save money on gasoline.
Once again, this is a balancing of the economics in favor of the consumer. There is absolutely no rationale for gasoline prices varying from street corner to street corner other than to eek-out a much profit from the consumer. And with gasoline prices in the U.S. being so high and Exxon-Mobile reporting over $10 bollion in 3rd quarter profits, the approval rating polls for the Bush Administration and Republican party seem to reflect that these people are not looking out for the better good of the American people.
I've heard that Konfabulator available for both PC and Mac is similar to Apple's Dashboard and there should be available an equivalent to "GAS" for that graphical environment. If so, get it, you won't regret the $30 shareware fee for Konfabulator.
We already know Wal-Mart is bad for small business, merchant exploitation, competition, and even larger suppliers, so I am in favor of anything that might allow good companies like Vlasic retain their ability to meet profit margins and pay their workers. I personally abhor and refuse to visit any of the Wally World constructs (or any of the other Mega-Lo-Marts) in favor of internet shopping and my wife's constant pursuit of the 1/2 price grocery store trip via coupon and sale shopping (not there yet, but getting closer). I also encourage anyone I work with or hang with to do the same, pointing out the examples above and following with the straight-forward explanation of how our family manages to avoid the ninth level of Hell.
when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
why?
Many stores, including to an extent WalMart, will offer that guarantee. However, while on the face of it the offer is good, the reality is that the offer is meaningless, as they have a trick to get around it.
Example:
You go into Z-Mart, and you see a Ricaroni 5 CD changer for $15. You pick up a Z-Mart flier showing the price.
You now head over to Q-Mart, and locate what initially appears to be the same Ricaroni 5 CD changer for $20. Since Q-Mart offers a "200% price difference" offer, you figure you are going to get the CD player for $10.
But wait! When you go to claim your offer, the friendly Q-Mart manager points out that the Z-Mart flier is offering a Ricaroni model #5551212-a player, and Q-Mart's is a Ricaroni model #5551212-b - a different model number. He then points out that their offer only applies to "the same model", and since this is NOT the same model number, it is not covered under their vaunted "200% price difference" offer.
Now, if you were able to check, you would find out that the only folks who have the model #5551212-a are Z-Mart, and the only folks who have the #5551212-b are Q-Mart. Moreover, if you could go to the Ricaroni manufacturing plant, you would see that the only difference between the model numbers is the model number sticker - they are otherwise the same unit.
Then why the model number difference? Because both Q-Mart and Z-Mart insist upon the model numbers they sell being unique - so that their "200% price guarantee" trick can work.
I've changed the names to protect the guilty, and obviously this trick isn't played on every item sold in every store, but it is played enough to allow the stores to offer tricks like this. And before you ask why the manufacturers go along with this - because when you are dealing with customers with the buying power of WalMart, BestBuy, and so on, you do what they want, or you don't sell product.
www.eFax.com are spammers
(fade in, dimly lit alley in back of walmart. 2am. Near dumpster)
Don Casalano: "Vinne, I'm glad you could meet wit' me at dis hour. we need too doo sumtin about dis.. ah, shall we say, dis 'discouragement' - dis..goooooo-gull"
Vinne: "You got it Don Casalano. Any'ting you say - you want meeta' whack um?"
Don Casalano: "Not yet Vinnie. First we send him a message. A short but to-da-point message. A message dat says stop interferin' in our biznizz. We don't need no help rollin' back da prices."
Vinne: "Wit all due respect Don Casalano, we aint had to send nobody dat message since Jimmie da Whip cut dat deal with Microsoft when we was sellin' them plain wrappa linux box--"
Don Casalano: "Vinnie, you're a sma't boy but don't get too sma't. Dis goooo-gul is irritatin' me like a boil in da crack'a my ass. If dey are gonna play, dey are gonna pay - now you go deliva dat message. I gotta call dis Ballma' guy back and see how his meetin' went.. I wonder if he t'rew da cha'ir like I told im to..."
Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
Last week I had a series of meetings with attorneys and accountants about a new software product. It really helped me understand the corporate mindset that pervades the industry:
* IP, in and of itself is valued by attorneys because it generates huge ammounts of billable work. No attorney in his or her right mind would recommend using anything that resembels an open source license. Too many barriers to litigation and legal fees. No huge lawsuits, no complex negotiations.
* Accountants like IP because it is valued however you need it to be.
So when I threw out the idea of GPLing the software, the result was almost comical:
* One attorney tried to explain how he needed to read the GPL. And bill me hours to do so. (not going to happen)
* One attorney suggested I'd be giving away a cash cow. I asked him: yours or mine. And the answer was a "what do you mean by that?" (struck a nerve here)
* My accountant said the intangible asset would be useful at the end of the year, and that an open source license may dilute the value of the asset.
It's very clear to me now why most business people see Google as a threat: intellectual property speculation has replaced the bilking investors with electric lemonade stands and WebVans full of irrational exuberance of the late 90's as the trendy way to make money out of thin air. Reality is going to be absolutely harsh to IP squatters & speculators:
* Innovation renders entire swaths of intellectual property useless. In the case of copyright, style and fashion relegate properties to the clearance bin or worse.
* For every piece of prime real estate, there are thousands of acres of desert, swampland, uninhabitable mountain terrain and tundra. Investors, many of which think the latest biotech idea will pay off in 10-15 years will find out that their idea isn't the winner - and will find out that a worthless patent is about as useful as an EPA superfund site is a location for a strip mall.
* Easments, emminent domain and the like have not been established in the IP world, and for the public good they will have to be. And the best ideas are often the ones that will eventually be taken via emminent domain. After all, if I can take your office park in NJ because I can put a bigger one up that will generate more tax revenue, why not take, say your one click buy or miracle drug patent because I can put it to better use for the common good?
I hope that Greenspan's last act parallels his cooling of the internet bubble: throwing a barrel of icewatter on the out of control party that the current IP feeding frenzy has become.
-- $G
I believe there is a good chance you missed my point: Google is beginning to directly compete with a lot of major big-time players. Google sprouted up virtually overnight, and is already stealing marketshare from companies that have sprawled out their empire over the course of decades. This is an unprecedented level of growth, and Steve Ballmer is royally pissed that he hasn't found a way to compete with them yet. Wal*Mart is scared as well, because what if it's true? What if Google successfully leads people to consistently lower priced items? Especially lower priced, brand name, big ticket items? What is Wal*Mart going to do to compete? Their prices are already about as low as they can possibly get. You are right, that it is all about losing marketshare for Microsoft (and everybody else). If I indicated that I felt any other way about that, I apologise for the lack of clarity. I thought it was obvious that was the issue when I pointed out that these companies still have not found a way to compete with Google, which is quickly stealing away their customer bases.
No, Google is your friend. Google seeks to create and share information others create. As long as they believe in and fight for the right of others to do the same, they are your friend. This is the exact opposite and the cure for the insane but inate will to control others you see. The truth does set you free.
We now live in a VERY dangerous time in which the scales seem to be tipping in favor of an Orwellian outcome where all information is locked down tight and any attempt to look under the hood or otherwise perform any "unauthorized" operation on any information/data/operating code is met with a draconian response of severely criminalizing those who would attempt to do so.
Ah, true, but you do not go far enough in your understanding of collective oligarchy and current law. Creating and sharing information is also against the rules by the DMCA, a very real law. You are supposed to mindlessly consume information fed to you, not examine, share or even remember it. Control of information is key to establishing an Orwellian society. That society proves it's existence to itself through suffering. The result is a society that exists to make you misserrable.
In the pathetic WalMart example you see the motivation and an indication of how absolutely that motivation is applied. They are paranoid. Perfect information might hurt their sales and ability to take your money. Walmart is also freaky about taking pictures in their stores and other petty details. It's all about power and control. The small scale of this power and control is a good reason to be afraid. It indicates that no detail is too small to be controlled and manipulated. Power demands absolute power and the will to power is part of human nature. Small minded people get a kick out of such petty control but it's part of all of us and it's implications are much larger.
Orwell recognized this about human nature. He drew his conclusions from experience in the colonies of the British Empire, as a tramp in Paris and London, a witness to communist revolutions in Spain and the second world war. These were all terrible experiences where the ordinary rules of conduct were removed and people were free to do oppress each other in any way. So, I'll quote the master:
'The rule of the Party is for ever. Make that the starting-point of your thoughts.'
' You understand well enough how the Party maintains itself in power. Now tell me why we cling to power. What is our motive? Why should we want power?'
He knew in advance what O'Brien would say. That the Party did not seek power for its own ends, but only for the good of the majority. That it sought power because men in the mass were frail cowardly creatures who could not endure liberty or face the truth, and must be ruled over and systematically deceived by others who were stronger than themselves. That the choice for mankind lay between freedom and happiness, and that, for the great bulk of mankind, happiness was better. That the party was the eternal guardian of the weak, a dedicated sect doing evil that good might come, sacrificing its own happiness to that of others.
'You are ruling over us for our own good,' he said feebly. 'You believe that human beings are not fit to govern themselves, and therefore --'
He started and almost cried out. A pang of pain had shot through his body. O'Brien had pushed the lever of the dial up to thirty-five.
'That was stupid, Winston, stupid!' he said. 'You should know better than to say a thing like that.'
'The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. ... The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in thei
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
It was nice while it lasted, but now its time to research those long term puts.
" Do you honestly think that the majority of consumers care about where their products are made? "
Oh yes, I think they do. That's why I think these brands link themselves to American products/ US Atheletes etc. to give the impression of being a US product (Or Swiss or Italian or whatever).
"What most people care about is getting stuff, and artificial intelligence and the internet (which is really what this article is about, not Google per se) is making this cheaper by stimulating competition."
I say this again and again, price isn't everything, value for money is. If you can't tell if an Italian Luxury handbag is really an Italian Luxury Handbag and not just a Chinese bag with some finishing done in Italy to qualify for the "Made in Italy" label, then how can you determine value for money? Any search you get from Froogle doesn't help with that.
Plus how much can you save? Is it worth the extra drive and extra time? I really don't think Walmart has much to fear there.
With Google, readers could search for other comments more insightful/informative than mine. Then those other comments would get the mod points instead. Who needs all that competition?
There is a conspiracy theory concerning WalMart: First, Clinton opened trade with China... where is he from? Arkansas. Where is Walmart headquartered? Arkansas. Where is most of the stuff you buy from Walmart made? This is the biggest outsourcing project of all time, and government funded no less. Now, add to that that both Walmart and China are restrictive of information and its time to put the tin-foil hats on!
I have never been a fan of Walmart, and I don't think that Google is the altruistic god of geekdom, but I do wonder about such links as described above. Besides that, its time for someone to have a site that tells you where the best deals in town really are. I'm talking about a voice link service, maybe you tap in the store name and bar code and the service tells you where the best deal is, so that while you are in the store shopping you can decide if that is where you want to spend your money. Of course, I'd also like the service to tell you where the best deal on US made parts/items are too, so you get the choice of supporting your home country or having your dollars shipped overseas, but that is another matter.
Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
Because WalMart is rarely the lowest price in an area. They only claim they are...especially when you take into consideration instant/mail-in rebates. They simply can't beat those prices...but even on much simpler products like new release DVDs, they are often $4 or $5 over the lowest priced competitor...
Sams Club and Wal-Mart are the same company.
retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
Oh that's great, here's our resident arrogant spoiled whiteboy, slummin' it in mom's basement, passing judgement on strangers.
Listen up, 'smart' guy: Most of Wal-Mart's target clientele is lower working class poor and straight up 'poor' people. That's true. Wal-Mart creates poor folks overseas, employs working poor here, and sells to poor people and bargain hunters.
But stupid?
Try disadvantaged. Or maybe members of the lowest end of the two-tiered class structure of the Internet-connected. In other words, the disenfranchised. Individually, they may or not be very well educated. Chances are, they aren't in the 'class' of the educated, either. But that means they're ignorant. And guess what? There's a cure for that, it's called 'education'.
But the disease affecting you, the white kid equating disenfranchisement and poor education (and its attendant 'ignorance') with 'stupid', is actually "stupidity"...and there may, or may not, be a cure for that, since 'stupidity', unlike ignorance, can be eternal.
Who knows? I know this: You're a spoiled, arrogant, and yes, "stupid" individual, and probably racist, also. Or is it just poor people you think are 'stupid', regardless of color? At any rate, you, my friend, are a prime example of the real 'problem' afflicting this country: Stupid people, having wasted their freeloading upbringing and education, and espousing poorly thought out opinions of people and classes they know nothing about, and then, probably, to make mattters worse, voting for folks who seem to mirror your own racist, arrogant stupidity.
Need I say...Fuck you?
Have a nice, hateful life, asshole