Slashdot Mirror


No More Lunar Land for Sale

dptalia writes "According to China Daily, Beijing authorities have shut down sales of lunar property. Apparently there's a "Lunar embassy" in China and they've sold 34 people deeds to land on the moon. Not too surprisingly, the government has declared this illegal. The Bejing office claims to be a satellite of the U.S. Lunar Embassy, run by Dennis Hope. Hope claims that while it is illegal for countries to stake a claim on the moon, it is legal for individuals and corporations to."

40 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. What? by bl4nk · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's clearly a lunatic.

    1. Re:What? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I moon over puns with that much bite.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:What? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "He's clearly a lunatic."

      Ugh. Lately these stupid puns have been a cheap way for a funny mod. I can't wait until this phase is over.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:What? by Sebilrazen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ugh. Lately these stupid puns have been a cheap way for a funny mod. I can't wait until this phase is over.

      So true. I'm waiting for the tide to turn as well, hopefully this mediocre humor is ebbing and we'll see this trend begin to wane.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
  2. Dang! by Dragoonmac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, at least we can be satisfied in knowing that the Moon is still open to conquest by anyone else. I'm still holding out for Sony to claim it and post advertisements on it for their products.

    --
    Shots: A Populist Parable
    1. Re:Dang! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll install their rootkit on it. Then we won't be able to see the thing until it crashes right into us.

    2. Re:Dang! by Trigun · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always thought that Pepsi would carve their logo into the moon.

    3. Re:Dang! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but then the Tick will destroy the laser and the moon will only say "Son" instead of "Sony" and then people will get really confused.

      That is, until Chairface builds a Laser-eraser.

    4. Re:Dang! by Sandmann · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me of a joke from the cold war:

      - Mr. President! The Russians have landed on Mars and they are busy are
      painting it red!

      - Don't worry. We'll just wait until they finish; then we'll write "Drink
      Coca-Cola" in big white letters on it.

  3. Wow!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only do they sell Lunar property, but I just got this fantastic deal on this bridge in Brooklyn!!! Highly Recommend this seller!

    1. Re:Wow!!! by Infinityis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Brooklyn? That's nothing, I got a great deal on a bridge over in Alaska...

  4. So let me get this straight... by ATAMAH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those 6 acres on the moon i just bought from them - cannot be developed on?

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by clem · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who knew it'd be adjacent to a wetland?

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  5. That's China for you... by saskboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The Bejing office claims to be a satellite of the U.S. Lunar Embassy, run by Dennis Hope. "

    They can even take Hope away from people.

    But seriously, this scam is as old as the 1960s, if not older. Is it my duty as a Slashdot reader to point out that a 30 year old scam copied recently, is not news? No, it's not, so forget I said that, because it is news since people are still falling for it.

    By the way, I've got a star to sell you. A nice one, in the Orion Belt.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  6. oldest dupe ever? by joeyspqr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The Man Sold the Moon"
    Robert Heinlein, 1950 (Street & Smith 1939)

    --
    +1 fashionably cynical
  7. Legal according to whom? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hope claims that while it is illegal for countries to stake a claim on the moon, it is legal for individuals and corporations to.

    Legal according to whom? I suppose if you have a problem you could take it up with the Lunar Police. Perhaps they'll throw Hope into the Lunar Jail, and he can speak to a Lunar Lawyer about clarifications on Lunar Law.

  8. Ahhhhh! by BTWR · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hope claims that while it is illegal for countries to stake a claim on the moon, it is legal for individuals and corporations to.

    Ahhh! You ended a sentence with a preposition!

    1. Re:Ahhhhh! by Pyromage · · Score: 3, Funny

      "This pedantry regarding ending a sentence with a preposition is the sort of business up with which I will not put" -- Winston Churchill

    2. Re:Ahhhhh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ahhh! You ended a sentence with a preposition!

      Yeah, well this is English, not Latin.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Ahhhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hope claims that while it is illegal for countries to stake a claim on the moon, it is legal for individuals and corporations to.

      Ahhh! You ended a sentence with a preposition!

      Hope claims that while it is illegal for countries to stake a claim on the moon, it is legal for individuals and corporations to, asshole!

  9. Aw, shucks! by ScaryMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I already have the parts assembled for my "Whalers on the Moon" attraction...

  10. Extend homesteading laws into space already by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you get off your ass, spend billions of dollars of your own money and go land on the Moon you should have some legal right to fence off a bit of land and claim it as your own. Once you've lived on the property for some set period of time you should be free to do a geological survey and apply for mining rights. If it wasn't for homesteading laws like this the west of the United States wouldn't have been settled (and all them native americans wouldn't have been killed, but that's hardly relevant to this discussion).

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  11. Re:Gift gag, genuine or gullible? by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... you'd think scams would go away. They won't. The only way that scams will be unprofitable is when government stops "protecting" citizens and lets people learn to be aware of what they're buying.

    My aunt doesn't fall for these things because she's protected. She falls for it because she's gullible and has always lived in a town filled with people she can trust absolutely. She's not taking risks because she thinks she has nothing to lose, so the government ceasing its protection is not going to help her. And her situation is exactly like everyone else's. But at least as long as it continues what protection it offers, a few stupid people will get their money back from evil bastards. I hate stupid people, but I hate evil bastards more.

    If you want people to learn to distrust, teach them that (and good freaking luck. Those people don't learn things), don't blame the government for trying to help the ones that get screwed.

  12. Legal according to... by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "Outer Space Treaty" (Though the UN experts disagree slightly), illegal according to the "Moon Treaty", which wasn't much supported and probably would not be considered in case anyone challenged Hope on it. I'd assume these treaties are going to get revoked once anyone starts having serious interest in extraterrestrial property, but until then his claims are about the best you'll get, aside from the UNs opinion, which many here don't seem to care much about :-)

    1. Re:Legal according to... by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      However, in the United States, according to Article VI of the Constitution, "...all Treaties made [...] shall be the supreme Law of the Land". This means that the treaty is not only binding upon the government, but also upon the citizens. That means that if the government can't claim it, neither can its citizens. ... I think, anyway. Naturally, IANAL.

      Actually, here's another angle to approach it from: claiming something as property requires that you occupy it, or at least control it in some respect. Obviously that's not possible, unless Neil Armstrong left a Century 21 sign in the Sea of Tranquility or something. Which means that any such property claims can reasonably be argued to have been abandoned, if not unenforceable in the first place.

      Regardless, any moron who tries to hold up a government that wants to build a research lab or a helium-3 refinery on "their" lunar property will be the cause of a great many guffaws in the halls of power shortly thereafter.

  13. Re:Gift gag, genuine or gullible? by blibbler · · Score: 5, Funny

    As the current US president said:
    "There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again"

  14. Whitelist law vs Blacklist law. by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hope claims that while it is illegal for countries to stake a claim on the moon, it is legal for individuals and corporations to.

    In the USA (ideal schoolboy optimism here), the government's powers are enumerated and the people retain the rest as their rights. That's "blacklist law" for you digit-heads: if it's on this list, you can't do it.

    In many other regimes, the individual's rights are enumerated (or never even written), and the government retains the rest as their powers. That's "whitelist law" for analogy: if it's on this list, you can do it. Guess where the China government weighs in?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  15. real issues here by J05H · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad the authorities shut these jackasses down. These "lunar/martian land for sale" businesses increase the giggle-factor against any legitimate property claims in space. Sort of like AC Clarke's statement about space elevators being built 25 years after everyone stops laughing, the same can be said for extraterrestrial land ownership. People issuing fake/joke certificates of ownership is bad PR in the long run.

    Space property rights, extended ownership and salvage rules are going to be hot areas of law over the next 50+ years. We've seen some action with new spectrum allocation, but nothing to grant land-claims, yet. There was a guy trying to charge rent for NEAR landing on asteroid Eros, but he got laughed out of court. Again with the giggle-factor.

    Real challenges to establish property claims in the near future: SpaceDev has said they will emplace transponders and legally claim any asteroids they explore. Someone will figure out how to recycle rocket stages in orbit (salvage). A company flying a private lander to the moon or Mars will claim the uranium/nitrates/ice/whatever that they find at their landing site. Two probes orbitting Ceres will dismantle each other while fighting over the iceball. Those are legitimate future cases for space property issues to be resolved. Lunar acreage in 2005 is not such an issue.

    Josh

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  16. A star to sell me? by game+kid · · Score: 4, Funny
    By the way, I've got a star to sell you. A nice one, in the Orion Belt.

    You cannot be Sirius.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:A star to sell me? by JasontheMason · · Score: 5, Funny

      But of course! And you could be the Sol owner!

      --
      "Ad infinitem et ultra!" - Buzz Lightyear
  17. well that's better by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    than the mining rights, or someone would be able to tunnel in uranus

  18. This is all fine... by chaboud · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm okay with people staking claims on the moon provided that a few conditions are met:
    1. Plots are assumed by flag-planting and are arranged by latitude and longitude. Polar plots are comprised of larger longitudinal sections to balance out the area covered by each plot. These plots are small (no larger than one square mile).
    2. Claim-stakers must take a standard 20 kilogram flag and plant it on the center of each plot to acquire it. That flag must be brought from sea level on Earth to the moon entirely intact (no building the flag in space). The flag must be visible from Earth once planted, and it must bear the signature of the owner. It must also be brought in person. If a robot plants the flag, that robot owns the plot.
    3. For claims to be complete, claim-stakers must return to Earth (sea level) 20 kilogram soil samples from the moon from the planting-places of their flags. This will allow indirect surveying of the moon's composition.
    4. Plots may not be sold directly. Plot owners may grant permission to other parties to lay new claim to their plots, but new claim-stakers must follow the rules governing virgin claim-stakers.
    1. Re:This is all fine... by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with the existing homesteading laws? If you want to claim a plot of land on the Moon all you should have to do is go fence it and live on it. After a specific period the land becomes yours and you can apply for a title, which you can then trade with anyone you want, or you can apply for geological survey and mining rights. Sure, it currently costs billions of dollars to get to the Moon, but that hardly makes it unfair to apply the same homesteading rules there as anywhere else.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:This is all fine... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      if you try to export materials from the Moon to Earth you're likely get some busy body government official telling you that you don't have the legal right to sell those materials.

      That's where targeting systems come in handy :-)

      It takes only a fraction as much fuel to lift a huge chunk of rock off the moon into orbit, than it would from Earth...

      Aim a giant moon-rock at Washington, give it a little push, and your government problems are solved.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  19. Hurry! Only 8,940,583,419 acres remaining by weighn · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, I got bored...surface area of the moon:
    37.8 million square km
    or 9,340,583,419.46 acres
    subtract 400,000,000 acres which are pwned and you are left with...shitloads of infertile land, but what a view! B)

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  20. Re:Gift gag, genuine or gullible? by Senjutsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Secondly, with government so charged to "protect" consumers from scams, you'd think scams would go away. They won't. The only way that scams will be unprofitable is when government stops "protecting" citizens and lets people learn to be aware of what they're buying.

    As the government doesn't actually refund the losses of any victim of scam victims (except in the vanishingly small number of cases where their money is recovered, months or years later), there is no less incentive right now to smarten up than there would be in a system under which the government didn't attempt to punish the scammer for his actions. People fall victim to scams because that's human nature, not because we have a nation of perfectly rational people who are shutting off their rationality because there's no punishment for doing so. The real world isn't a Libertarian's flight of fancy; humans are not perfectly rational actors.

    On the other hand under the current system there is less incentive for new scammers to take up the trade, while in a system absent the disincentives of government punishment, given that gullible people will still be every bit as gullible, scammers would flourish.

  21. I bought land on the moon before this guy by billstewart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Back when I was in grad school in Berkeley in 1978-1979, I bought an acre of land on the moon. Unlike this current guy, who claims to have legitimately laid claim to the whole moon and to be selling everybody a unique piece of land, the guy I bought it from showed up on campus wearing a silver space suit and doing a great schtick, making it clear that he's selling everybody the *same* acre of land, and that he's trading you a nice big fancy green piece of paper with engraving and shiny bits on it and pictures of the moon (the deed) in return for a little boring green piece of paper with a picture of a dead politician on it. He'd been arrested a number of times, because some towns don't like guys in space suits selling acres of land on the moon, but they couldn't legitimately charge him with fraud because he was quite upfront about how he's selling everybody the same acre of land, and he had lots of good pictures of the police trying to keep a straight face while busting him. And he finished with an anti-drug message, about how you shouldn't go taking large quantities of LSD or *you* might end up on the streetcorner in a silver spacesuit selling people land on the moon.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  22. Staking a Claim/Claimjumping by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I work in the mineral industry, and we frequently encounter what is known as "paper staking", whereby the purported claimant just files the paperwork rather than actually physically staking the ground.

    It's the source of many lawsuits, and oftentimes claimjumping.

    "Staking Your Claim to Alaska's Mineral Wealth"

  23. Who will enforce it? by dingleberrie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hi. I'm looking for someone to enforce my deed for lunar land. My country won't do it because it has no jurisdiction. I am trying to assemble my own army, but I have no money left since I spent most of it acquiring the entire crater out beyond the 10 mile mark of the perimeter. Please help, as my only other recourse is a contact I have in Nigeria. Thanx.

  24. Biggest Landgrab in History by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've long considered the Outer Space Treaty the biggest - and most arrogant - land grab in history when our so-called governments decided that none of its citizens could own anything off of the Earth itself. In essence, they have taken the entire rest of the Universe and put it off limits for private ownership. How dare they?!

    Of course none of the Outer Space Treaty actually matters since the truth is that land, as always, will belong to he (or she) who can claim it and defend it afterwards! We don't need no stinking treaty.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."