Slashdot Mirror


Inmarsat Brings 3G Broadband to North America

Jessup writes "The Earth just got one step closer to true global broadband through satellite based communications. With the launch of the Zenit-3SL rocket the Inmarsat-4 F2 satellite brings 3G high speed cell technology to North America. From the article: 'Their onboard technology is designed to allow people to set up virtual offices anywhere around the world via high-speed broadband connections and new 3G phone technology.'"

129 comments

  1. Yay! by Daedius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now were only 2 years behind Korea, Japan, and the rest of the 3G world!

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now all they have to fix is the high latency with satellites... Hrm... better change the speed of electrons...

    2. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the most retarded comment to ever get modded up, sheesh.

    3. Re:Yay! by TheGSRGuy · · Score: 1

      This is the sad reality in many of the technical areas. Our cell phones are always the "old models" Japan and the rest of S.E. Asia has already seen. Frankly, with global markets, I'm still baffled why we have to wait 12 months or more to see these kinds of things. Remember when the PlayStation 2 came out? Japan had it first, despite the fact that the sales in the US probably outnumbered those in Japan by a bg margin.

    4. Re:Yay! by coleblak · · Score: 1

      That's a stupid comment. Sony is Japanese. The PS2 is obviously going to be released there first, just like the Nintendo systems unlike the XBox which would obviously be released in America first because, holy hell, Microsoft is a US company. And of course we would sell more. We have a larger bloody citizen base than they do. Their whole country would fit in california and half our population.

      --
      77 HITS
      Really Long Off Topic Combo
    5. Re:Yay! by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Do you mind explaining why it's stupid?

      Why should you release something in country X first just because you're located there. I would think they'd make decisions based on what would get them the most money, not based on something arbitrary like "where we're located."

    6. Re:Yay! by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of logistics.

      I build systems and networks for a living ( asterisk since you asked ). In theory, it shouldn't matter if my client is in New York or next door. However, in practice it's easier to work with customers that are closer than it is for a customer on the other side of the country. It's the details: Things like knowing the local ISPs and equipment suppliers, to who's a good tech in the area if I need a set of hands on site.

      Foriegn companies may have the same issues.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    7. Re:Yay! by scbysnx · · Score: 1

      or just go fly a stratellite http://www.stratellite.net/

    8. Re:Yay! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Now were only 2 years behind Korea, Japan, and the rest of the 3G world!"

      Of course, this isn't at all related to 3G mobile phone systems, which we have had for over four years (CDMA2000 1xRTT qualifies).

      But, hey, it's a joke aimed at the US, and this is Slashdot - never let facts get in the way.

    9. Re:Yay! by tob · · Score: 1

      Tivo is Philips is dutch. I still have not seen Tivo systems for sale in the Netherlands. Your theory does not hold.

      Tob

    10. Re:Yay! by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 3, Funny

      The USA has always been years, if not decades, behind the rest of the world in mobile technology. While the entire world built mobile networks based on the GSM standard -- with transmissions at 900MHz and 1800Mhz -- the USA refused, since one or both (I forget) of those frequencies was reserved for military use. Rather than coming up with a workaround or joining the international groups and proposing an amendment to the GSM spec, the USA just said "Screw you, commies! We don't need your stinkin' European phone system! Freedom Fries! USA! USA!"

    11. Re:Yay! by drwho · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're jumping up and down about nothing. GSM has been in the US for a while. Systems other than GSM had been used in Europe besides GSM, and CDMA is still used throughout China. CDMA has it's advantages, so does GSM. If anyone cares, I can pull out the references.

      There's many things to get annoyed at the US government for. Not standardizing on GSM is not one of them.

    12. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, then why do my european commie GSM phone work in USA? They did add 1900MHz to the GSM standard and even one more (Motorola make quadband phones). Cingular and T-Mobile and a bunch of others use GSM. What hasnt been done is upgrading that to UMTS. USA have EV-DO instead and are pretty much alone on that BUT the US market is so big you really dont need to care about the rest of the world.

    13. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst the US market is big it's still not a faction of the potential of India and China - would make sense to work with them to a standard.

    14. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US companies have been working with China. They have been using CDMA in parts of China for a while now.

    15. Re:Yay! by droolinggeezer · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, while everyone was yelling commie, we were also developing CDMA technology that is now the foundation of every latest-generation cellular system in the world, including all of those systems that were using GSM. If you actually knew anything about the history of such systems and something about capital-intensive businesses, you would realize that when a new technology, like GSM was at some point, comes about, that cellular companies cannot simply uplug their subscribers and spend billins to replace their eisting systems. For crying out loud, the US cellular companies are just now ramping down their support for the old ANALOG systems (such extended support mandated by the FCC).

    16. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivo is a US company based in california.

  2. Two? by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article: "It is the second in a planned two-satellite constellation."

    It only takes two items to make a constellation?? Three would be a crowd, I guess.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Two? by cytoman · · Score: 1

      "Canis Minor is a simple two-star constellation consisting of Procyon and Gomeisa, a much dimmer star located slightly to the north of Procyon."

      From http://moreheadplanetarium.org/files/march04_membe r.html

  3. 3G is Okay by lotus_out_law · · Score: 1

    But is the world mature enough for that?
    I was under the impression that 3G would be an overkill, till the mobiles etc does get mature enough for that..

    Come to think of that, even now 2G is unavailable at quite a few places.

    1. Re:3G is Okay by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      3G and 2.5G have been available in many, many places throughout the world, for several years now, with handsets utilising all sorts of features, like two way video calling, video on demand, streaming data feeds.

      The US, at least, is woefully behind the times.

    2. Re:3G is Okay by Znork · · Score: 1

      It's more a question wether the cell companies are mature enough for it. Personally I'd bet they're going to price themselves out of the game with 3G and get clobbered by wlan/voip, the same way they clobbered Iridium once upon a time.

      Cheaper and faster but lower coverage networks will simply wreak havoc with the size of the customer base for services which arent that essential.

  4. Only America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why only North America, doesn't it orbit around the whole world?

    1. Re:Only America? by AndyFewt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well it is most likely (The article didnt confirm this) be in a geosynchronous orbit. That means the satellite stays in a fixed position in the sky relative to the ground. The position of the satellite in space (at an altitude of 22,237 miles) is where the speed of the satellite matches the speed of Earth's rotation. It is unlikely it performs a faster orbit around the planet as then it would also provide services to the other side of the world.

    2. Re:Only America? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      The unmentioned downside is that ping times via geosynhcronous orbiting sats are awful.

      * Gaming is impossible
      * web surfing is click...wait...wait...wait...display. and wait twice as long if javascript tries to load more images.
      * FTP and email work fine, as do most file sharing networks.
      * VOIP has intolerable delays, plus the delays are so long some echo cancellation algorithms give up

    3. Re:Only America? by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

      Somehow they are doing VOIP at low quality, using 4Kbps. Why is VOIP [ TCP/IP] -> geosync -> land any noticeably longer lag that sat phone [circuit switch ] -> geosync -> land?

      --
      --
    4. Re:Only America? by geraint-nz · · Score: 1

      yes it is in geosynchronous orbit, it says so on the inmarsat site. i wonder how the latency will affect the link?

    5. Re:Only America? by arazor · · Score: 1

      I have seen the comment that gaming is impossible everytime a cell or satellite internet is mentioned. What I am wondering would it be possible to set up a server for high lag users so they could play among equals?

    6. Re:Only America? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      globalstar and iridium sat phones use(d) LEO sats and had much lower delays.

      old-school sat phones (with the briefcase sized antennas) have the delay, but when you're "embedded" in afghanistan you put up with it.

    7. Re:Only America? by saj_s · · Score: 1

      > Well it is most likely (The article didnt confirm this) be
      > in a geosynchronous orbit. .... It is unlikely it performs a
      > faster orbit around the planet as then it would also provide
      > services to the other side of the world.

      Actually, this is one of a series of satellites that will eventually provide global coverage. This specific satellite is for the Americas only.

    8. Re:Only America? by m4dm4n · · Score: 1

      Where I live, the international internet connection is often routed through geosynhcronous orbiting sats.

      The ping is usually around 650ms.

      FPS Gaming is close to impossible yes. WOW and others are at least playable (though not great).
      Websurfing is fine (really the extra 650ms doesn't hurt much at all)
      VOIP isn't great, but I wouldn't call it intolerable. It is in fact much like any international calls were 15 years ago.

  5. We all know the truth by AndyFewt · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Virtual offices".. yeh ok, we all know it will be used for porn, porn and more porn. 3G porn on the go!

    1. Re:We all know the truth by spxero · · Score: 0


      And of course the porn industry is going to decide the best phone to view it on...

      Hooray for unlimited data plans!

    2. Re:We all know the truth by vagabond_gr · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could work in a nice virtual environment together with Jenna Jameson, Jesse Jane and Briana Banks.

    3. Re:We all know the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where the name comes from! Wikipedia on 3G.

  6. It's so fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll sware it was broadband! Load of non-sense, doesn't this just cache web-pages? I'd be happier with real broadband, expecially because it's way more affordable (price/performance) than dialup. Of course, my opinions would be different if I was using the interent for different reasons (there's definately a niche demographic for this kind of technology somewhere).

    1. Re:It's so fast... by Snover · · Score: 1
      --

      [insert witty comment here]
  7. Threegeeper by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What kind of reporting tells us in detail about the "innovative" use of oil drilling platform tech, but not *how fast this "3G" connection is*? It's just PR, not reporting. And since US "3G" means "whatever the phone company sells you and calls 3G", there's no way to find out. Thanks, BBC!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Threegeeper by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
      What kind of reporting tells us in detail about the "innovative" use of oil drilling platform tech, but not *how fast this "3G" connection is*?

      Yes, the article is lacking. But, you can get the answer by googling for "BGan Inmarsat" (I got the terms from TFA). Or you can go directly to Inmarsat's webpage: http://countdown.inmarsat.com/bgan/default.aspx?to p_level_id=31&language=EN&textonly=False.

      It's up to 492Kbps, send and receive, for variable bit rate. For guaranteed bit rate, it's up to 256Kbps. I don't know if that means X Kbps each direction, or combined. Maybe someone else can fill in the gaps.

    2. Re:Threegeeper by Hey+Pope+Felcher+.+. · · Score: 1

      . . . about the most info I can find so far comes from their press release

      BGAN is an IP and circuit-switched service that will offer voice telephony and a sophisticated range of high-bandwidth services, including internet access, videoconferencing, LAN and other data services, at speeds up to half a megabit per second.

      Of course this means jack-shit in real world practicalities, and don't forget it doesn't mention those wonderful ping times.

      So all in all, a fairly useless piece of info, but hey, at least we know that these satellites are

      60 times more powerful and have 20 times more capacity than their predecessors, the Inmarsat-3 satellites.

      I can rest easy now.

  8. Affordable to upgrade? by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most of the world is still using 2Ghz computers. Does this mean they simply won't be able to communicate as fast as 3G (i.e. only use ¾ of the pipe) or are they completely unable to sync?

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Affordable to upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you have misunderstood the subject completely.

      3G stands for third generation and has nothing to do with the clockspeed of processors, but rather signal encoding over the air for mobile devices.

    2. Re:Affordable to upgrade? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      3G actually stands for "3rd-generation", and is describing a generation of mobile telephone technology. Check out the Wikipedia article for more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3G

    3. Re:Affordable to upgrade? by Professional+Heckler · · Score: 1

      I believe 3G refers to the speed and bandwidth of the satellite connection and does not refer in anyway to computer speed itself. In a nutshell it means that faster internet connections will be much more affordable and less of a hassle. Hope it spreads to my part of the U S of A quickly. See you all on Usenet when it does!! Prof

    4. Re:Affordable to upgrade? by Hey+Pope+Felcher+.+. · · Score: 1

      . . . I wouldn't worry too much about it, as long as you've bought an Intel processor, your machine should be powerful enough to surf and browse the internets, even at this 3G level. In fact, with the power of "Intel Inside", the required page should load before you even knew you wanted it.

    5. Re:Affordable to upgrade? by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      No, 3G refers to how many 'G' bills you'll need to shell out to Verizon for this technology on a crippled DRM enabled firmware locked phone which will only be available in 3 years but only if you commit to a new 2 yr contract and are willing to convert your cable tv and car insurance to the Verizon bundle. Can you hear me now?

    6. Re:Affordable to upgrade? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      3G stand for 3rd generation of GSM

      GSM is a telephony protocol subset of SS7 which is the old system for
      control the PSTN , public switched telephone network .

      They have to make the new tech work to an extent with the old .

      Interoperability and all .

      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  9. More crap on my phone? by conan_the_trollarian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can we back up, and make a phone that actually works before we put 100 different things on it?

    1. Re:More crap on my phone? by garrett714 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, my girlfriend recently got a "Siemens" (appropriately titled) cell phone for free from T-Mobile. The phone has a horrible user interface and is incredibly slow when navigating the menus. This may not be true for other higher end phones but the average person's phone isn't even ready to take advantage of 3G even though most claim support for the system.

    2. Re:More crap on my phone? by game+kid · · Score: 1

      A phone? That works? Why should I perform expensive, time-consuming testing to accomplish that, when I can instead offer random audiovisual experiences, include appealing technologies and drive competitive pricing while increasing market exposure?

      Signed,
      Every Big Buzzword Master^W^W Cellphone Maker in America

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:More crap on my phone? by gambit3 · · Score: 1

      My phone works. Just about everybody I know has cell phones, and they all work. Maybe you should just switch phones if yours doesn't work.

      Point being, if you're going to bitch, bitch about *something* not just "____ doesn't work!!"

  10. Is today pirate day?? by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting



    INMARSAT is International Maritime Satellite, a company originally dedicated to ship communications. They're also a pipeline for information hacked by ship pirates to analyze booty to steal.

    INMARSAT has enough satellites to cover the globe, and they've bribed every major government of the world to require large cargo ships to use their system, greatly increasing the cost. They now are manipulating the added profits to extend 3G internationally.

    I'm a fan of 3G, but not by a megacorp that earned its income through coercion. The fact that large shippers are m ndated to use INMARSAT and that pirates are already receiving the information (speed, cargo weight, location) increases our costs of goods and puts more control powers to the company.

    You think Haliburton is bad?

    1. Re:Is today pirate day?? by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you have any proof on ANYTHING you just said?

    2. Re:Is today pirate day?? by conan_the_trollarian · · Score: 1

      Proof? In this day and age? I'll bet you eat up every piece of drivel cnn and the other media sources spew out and don't ask for any proof from them...

    3. Re:Is today pirate day?? by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a PDA phone user, so links are hard, but here goes:

      Anti-competitive

      Orbit Act I think

      Pirates + Govt Mandates

      I have 9 years of history with Inmarsat and Iridium.

    4. Re:Is today pirate day?? by Xiph · · Score: 1

      Well... inmarsat bgan doesn't have the best reputation from the people I know who've had to deal with their systems.
      whether it was coercion or just heavy lobbyism i'm not sure (hell i'm not sure what the difference is) but the companies that are forced to use them are often as big (or bigger revenue wise) take a company as maersk or bp.
      that being said i'm well aware that the bill will always be send on to the end user.
      but hey, someone's got to pay up for technological progress and prosperity.

      and no, their customer support service does not work in firefox (which was my friends biggest grief).
      ps. sorry for biting the trolls tail

      --
      Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
    5. Re:Is today pirate day?? by kindbud · · Score: 1

      You don't need to hack a satellite feed to get that information. It is available on the web at AISlive.com and several other services. Commercial vessels broadcast this information on a reserved marine VHF channel using HDLC packet protocol. Receivers are cheap, around $250, so all you need is a notebook, a VHF radio, and charting software that can plot AIS data.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    6. Re:Is today pirate day?? by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, INMARSAT is also the choice of many a smaller countries military for classified global communications (makes our (the US Military's Intel community) job easier). There are already other reasonable options out there. Pick up a copy of "SIGNAL" or "C4ISR" and you'll find no shortage of ads for VSAT and other technologies that provide truely global IP services on a reasonable cost basis (many are available to the general public though not marketed as such).

    7. Re:Is today pirate day?? by ToteAdler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you clearly have no clue what you're talking about. The GMDSS (Global Maritime Distress and Safety System) allows INMARSAT as one of the options of long distance communications. If a company doesn't want to go with INMARSAT they still have the option of radio, which they are required to have if they travel to far north or to far south (70 deg N & 70 S) that they are out of the footprint of the satellites and away from coast stations for any part of their voyage. As for making money off the system, the INMARSAT corp is required to not charge for any distress or medical messages. Any other messages passed are for the convenience of the shipping companys and so they should pay. I think the pirate thing has been addressed in another post.

    8. Re:Is today pirate day?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such requirement. Inmarsat is a commercial alternative to services also provided over MF/HF/VHF bands, which is free to use.
      The only monopoly of inmarsat is that IF you decide to choose a commercial solution for your safety and distress signaling, you MUST go with inmarsat since it's the only GMDSS approved system.

  11. price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Inmarsat currently does phone service in many VERY remote areas (places such as the middle of the oceans, and Antarctica I believe), and it has a pricetag to match.

    If the pricing for this is anything like their phone service...it won't be a very viable solution.

    1. Re:price? by NETHED · · Score: 1

      I think the news networks will eat this up like mad. You know those crappy sat phones they have now? What if the next generation of these devices included a high-performance mpeg4 encoder and sent them up at 200kbps? Maybe its not a real sat truck, but if they would be like the suitcase ones. Look at this page, they even mention INMARSAT's new service.

      --
      --sig fault--
  12. Ping? by TriezGamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's the purpose of having so much bandwidth without a decent ping time to make it worth gaming on? That's what offices are for, isn't it?

    1. Re:Ping? by game+kid · · Score: 1
      That's what offices are for, isn't it?

      Assuming nonreal complex values of office, anyway...

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  13. Obligatory karma whore wiki by dada21 · · Score: 2, Informative
  14. What will it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There was a previous attempt to link the world with satellite based 'cell' phones. They launched lots of birds but at the price they were charging for air time, they had no customers. This kind of service may be good for offshore oil rigs and arctic explorers but that kind of customer base is much too small to make it pay. Everyone else is connected much more cheaply than this service can probably compete with. Of course, I didn't see any mention of fees in tfa.

    1. Re:What will it cost? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've had 3G in my pocket for more than a year now. When I first got it, I browsed the front page of slashdot. When my bill came in, I saw that it had cost me $11.

      I hope you get it a bit cheaper over there..

    2. Re:What will it cost? by bob+h · · Score: 1

      Here's some prices:
      MPDS - Mobile Packet Data Service: $4.00 per Mbit ('Always on')
      http://store.yahoo.com/satphonestore/kvhtracf77in. html>

  15. Compaired to GPRS by Charliems · · Score: 5, Informative


    Download Speeds
    3G: max 384kbps
    GPRS: max 48kbps

    Upload Speeds
    3G: max 64kbps
    GPRS: max 24kbps

    1. Re:Compaired to GPRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need a price and geographic availability comparison. Anyone have the goods? (Even a qualitative comparison would be nice.)

    2. Re:Compaired to GPRS by Nimloth · · Score: 1

      What's the big fuss all about?

      With 1X Ev-DO up here we can now get 700 kbps down and 85 kbps up. Revision A should be here next year to make upload 10 times faster...

    3. Re:Compaired to GPRS by markd89 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the latency. Ping times of 800ms I would guess.

    4. Re:Compaired to GPRS by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Why the hell does no one get this:

      This is a satellite communication system. Not 3G cellular.

      Immarsat has latency that is considerably worse than even GPRS, and it's surprisingly expensive.

      Comparing it to GPRS is stupid.

  16. Why don't citizens join together by zymano · · Score: 0

    Why don't we join together to put wifi/wimax towers every few miles in our backyards ?

    We could build a national network .

    Is this possible ?

    1. Re:Why don't citizens join together by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      We could join together to end war and poverty, as long as we're all meeting anyway about the WiFi towers. Heck if someone types up an agenda, we could blow through these three issues by lunchtime...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    2. Re:Why don't citizens join together by drwho · · Score: 1
      We could join together to end war and poverty,


      No, you can't. War is natural, just like evolution. Or do you believe in 'Intelligent Design'? And overty is just the name for the people on the low end of the totem pole. For instance, some people are now claiming that lack of broadband Internet makes them 'victims of poverty' - give me a break.

    3. Re:Why don't citizens join together by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Rats, and I was going to ask you to make up the agenda too...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    4. Re:Why don't citizens join together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And overty is just the name for the people on the low end of the totem pole.

      And here I thought that "overty" is the name for eople so oor that they can't even afford a ot to iss in.

  17. Mad Cool! by Comatose51 · · Score: 1
    "Their onboard technology is designed to allow people to set up virtual offices anywhere around the world via high-speed broadband connections and new 3G phone technology."

    Can you imagine going war-driving with THAT!?

    On a more serious note, anyone know how the service is going to work? Do the users have to subscribe to the BGan service and always use the satellite or does the satellite kick in when land based connections are weak? The latter case would be very cool. Imagine a phone that can pick and choose connection methods such as WiFi, 3G, and satellite as the situation dictates and an ISP that will provide it to you.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Mad Cool! by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

      The wi-fi is so that you can share the connection with a couple other laptops / computer equipment sitting next to you in the middle of nowhere (i.e., the equipment has an access point built in), not for alternate network connectivity.

      --
      --
  18. Don't get too excited until you know the price tag by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the late 90s, I talked to a very nice fellow who owned a gorgeous 120' yacht and was travelling around the world as he chartered it. Of course cut-price or no, a 120' yacht is not one of the cheapest things in the world to run, even if you get your diesel from Venezuela at $0.10 a gallon!

    We got to talking about boats and Inmarsat and the like, and he was kind enough to tell me his 56k connection cost $12 a minute. The mere act of emailing me must have cost a few bucks an email!

    So it's not at all meaningful to know that INMARSAT service is getting better, without understanding how expensive it is. I think the satellite phone service is a couple of dollars a minute.

    If it's that expensive, I fear it's of limited interest to most Slashdot users :-(.

    D

  19. Is it sattelite or cell based by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    The summary says both sattelite and cell. These are 2 totally different technologies.

  20. Monthly fee to use your computer ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out "Office Live" that Microsoft is pushing now...

    Very basically, you will not be able to buy any software in the future. You will have to dial out and use all your apps online for a monthly subsribtion fee, like your cell phone! Ever heard of VNC?

    Think of your future Microsoft computer as some kinda sick uber-terminal that needs to be hooked up to the mainframe at Redmond to run anything (don't need cables, maybe will use 3G or sattelite internet, or whatever). Upside is that you can carry with you all your settings, apps, docs no matter what device you use. And you can figure the downsides for yourself ;-)

    Hacking that? Well, that would be like hacking cell-phones, or steal other people's credit money... Make no mistake about it: any computer hacking in the future would ab initio involve activities that are highly criminal and illegal. Couple that with mandatory biometrics, and the 'hackers' just can't hide! But hey, at least script-kiddies will be nubbed in the bud!

    Off-topic, here I come

    1. Re:Monthly fee to use your computer ;-) by waferhead · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought any software since ~1994, when I first dual booted my Amiga into Linux.

      Oh, wait, I DID buy 2 copies of Quake3A for Linux, so that's not completely true.

    2. Re:Monthly fee to use your computer ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the whole point, you see.

      Ten years from now (2015) you will still be stuck with your 'l33t' hardware from 2006.
      You will still have a choice, you just would not be able to buy a computer that would run 'unsigned' Linux and 'other malware'.

      Microsoft will look out for your digital security and privacy! Bright new future of Trusted Computing is coming to you, just bend over and wait...

  21. LLOOLLL by Viriatus · · Score: 1, Funny

    LLLOOOLL i'm using a 3G celular phone for a long time ago. ONLY NOW USA?????

    1. Re:LLOOLLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you have nobody to call.

    2. Re:LLOOLLL by Viriatus · · Score: 0

      You are wrong. I know quite a few people in my country (Portugal) that have a 3G phone. There are also 3 ISP's that have a 3G internet servive.

  22. What do you mean "mandated to use"? by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

    How is it mandated that a ship must use Inmarsat/BGAN? Also, how is it that the pirates get your info from it? (No, I'm not a wannabe pirate.) I'm not giving you a hard time; I'm genuinely curious.

    --
    --
    1. Re:What do you mean "mandated to use"? by AlexCV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Inmarsat is mandated has a ship-to-shore communication system for distress signaling purpose. Along with a specially enabled VHF radio and a GPS (I believe a 406EPIRB is also required), it forms part of the GMDSS (Global Marine Distress something something).

      Inmarsat has basically taken the place used by a traditional HF radio. It should be noted that it's not that expensive if it is used solely has part of the GMDSS requirements. The pricing model on Inmarsat is a bit extortionary, but they don't really have much competition.

  23. Two = consellation scenario by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    In the scenario where the constellation was a straight line... I'd allow it.

    Of course, I am not the authority on such things.

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  24. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by planckscale · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I recently made reservations with the Marina in Cabo for my parents who were on a 42' sailboat with the service http://skymate.com/. Their service description says it is the global, low cost alternative to expensive 'by the minute' satellite services or low coverage, unpredictable cellular providers. It worked very well and the folks were able to send me GPS coordinates (26.26 n, 113.57 w), as well as updates and the request to contact the marina. Email I believe is limited to 1000 characters. Still, I was impressed.

    --
    Namaste
  25. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

    According to some promo info, with the new service you only pay for the bits you actually send/receive, not for just having the thing on, so you aren't tying up bandwidth for dead air.

    --
    --
  26. They are going to need a good slogan by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Inmarsat: Bringing the worms home to you. Fast.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  27. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    I think that was true of this service as well, but nonetheless with the time required to set up and tear down the connection and likely minimums it probably cost almost a minute's worth of call time to send an email.

    I'd love to know how much this new service is; anyone know?

    D

  28. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    You can actually get a broadband RV service for (if my memory serves) about $6500 for the service plus $150 a month but it appears not to work for boats, which is a real pity. That kind of company might be worth looking for next time you or your parents go on a cruise.

    Skymate's still a bit expensive, with a total monthly allocation of 50,000 characters even for the most expensive ($69.95 monthly) plan.

    And you can't surf the web or do anything interactive.

    Still, it's a sign that the cost of this kind of service is going down.

    Eventually.

    D

  29. Your phone does not communicat to the satelite. by RingDev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is nothing new, 3G (3rd Generation, not 3gig) has been offered in many US metropolitan areas (DC, LA, Chicago, Madison). 3G is still provided by standard cell towers, the problem is how to get that fatty pipe to each tower. There are a few ways. The expencive way is to run fiber from tower to tower. A cheaper route is Microwave (look for a 20' dish with LOS to another tower/20' dish), but it requires line of sight. Satelite allows the cell towers to connect via terestrial means, or in cases of isolated or expencive locations they can toss a small dish on the tower for a fraction of the cost.

    This is not to be confussed with Magellon or other SatPhones that actually did communicate directly to the satelites. Those phones, while wikkid cool, were insanely expensive. And just how many phone calls are you going to make from the top of Everest when your minutes cost you $20 a pop?

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  30. 3G now? by sdugoten2 · · Score: 1

    I have been using 3G network for almost a year already, and the 3G service has been available since 2003 in Hong Kong. I really don't understand why US is so behind on the broadband/3G service, which I think US should be the leader in these areas. When I live in the state back then, I almost paid $200 bucks for 6M down/256k up pipe with a /29 static IP blocks. Yes, it was expensive, and I guess it is still the same price even now. In Hong Kong, they already offer 1000mb pipe for US $300 a month and 100mb pipe for US $35 a month.

    No, it's not that population/density issue, it's because of the regulation give absolutely no incentive for PacHell/SBC to upgrade.

    On a side note, I see people posting that 3G is overkilled. I am not sure about you, but I have been watching news LIVE on my phone when I am on my way to work on bus.

    1. Re:3G now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using 3G network for almost a year already, and the 3G service has been available since 2003 in Hong Kong. I really don't understand why US is so behind on the broadband/3G service, which I think US should be the leader in these areas.

      Here is the little secret no one mentions: the US market is actually _ahead_ of you when it comes to mobile data service. I have had data service equivalent to 3G (umts) via 1xRTT for almost three years and finally upgraded recently to EV-DO service that provides a data speed that is about twice the speed of what "3" is offering to you in Hong Kong. When the revision A upgrades to EV-DO come out the upstream side of that connection will be about _10 times_ what you have available.

      Yes, we don't get the latest and greatest phone units, but our infrastructure has already passed yours and is speeding ahead while everyone who thought 3G was the future tries to deal with the cluster-fuck which that decision has turned out to be.

    2. Re:3G now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of crap. 3G UMTS is easily upgradable to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSPDA . Take your EV-DO and go shuv it up your ass.

    3. Re:3G now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of crap. 3G UMTS is easily upgradable to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSPDA . Take your EV-DO and go shuv it up your ass.

      And where or where can you get such service? NOWHERE! It is currently what we in the technology industry call "vapor." Until you can point to a single person who can actually use this service now I suggest you STFU and keep this discussion grounded in the real world.

      I have faster mobile data service than you and I am stuck in that mobile phone backwater called the US. Ha ha ha.

    4. Re:3G now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Until you can point to a single person who can actually use this service..." Oh look: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=27565

      Yes sir, you may go swivel on my middle finger.

  31. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by timeOday · · Score: 1

    How can it be that expensive? Even Iridium is "only" $30/mo + $1.50 per minute, through a handset. And you can even get data services at a whopping 2.4 Kbps. Ok, that's laughably bad, but you could transfer 50KBytes in under 3 minutes for about $4.50 in airtime.

  32. MOD PARENT UP by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    This is not "bringing" 3G to the US. We've had it for quite some time - CDMA2000 is a 3G technology. You can transfer data at higher than modem speeds via cell phone (1xRTT) just about anywhere in the country, and in most major cities, you can get DSL speeds too (1xEV-DO).

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  33. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember my friend's Iridium equipment for his yacht was something like $25,000-$50,000. The Skymate service uses a $1,000-odd receiver/dish. That difference in equipment cost pretty much insulates Skymate from price comparisons with Iridum.

    Actually, it sounds like SailMail offers very similar services for a much cheaper fee, apparently $250 a year. (That's up from $100 when I'd first heard of them - yikes). Sailmail uses SSB radio which I think is less spiffy than satellite, but I understand it does the job, and there's a 10k limit on messages instead of the rather pathetic 1k limit from Skymate. Worth a look.

    D

  34. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Yowsers! Nowadays the Iridium phone is down to $1500 and the data kit is $189.

  35. *Sigh* by Neoncow · · Score: 1

    Obligatory meta-funny whore post.
    I hope you're happy now.

  36. Inmarsat is affordable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Below are the international rates ( dollars per minute pricing, so talk quickly)
    I can get through my phone company:

    Inmarsat Atlantic East Aero
    15.84
    Inmarsat Atlantic East Mini M
    12.47
    Inmarsat Atlantic East A Voice/Data
    12.47
    Inmarsat Atlantic East BHSD
    12.47
    Inmarsat Atlantic East B Voice/Data
    12.47
    Inmarsat Atlantic East M
    15.84
    Inmarsat Atlantic West A Voice/Data
    12.47
    Inmarsat Atlantic West Aero
    15.84
    Inmarsat Atlantic West BHSD
    17.94
    Inmarsat Atlantic West BVoice/Data
    12.47
    Inmarsat Atlantic West M
    15.84
    Inmarsat Atlantic West Mini M
    12.47
    Inmarsat Indian Ocean A Voice/Data
    12.47
    Inmarsat Indian Ocean Aero
    15.84
    Inmarsat Indian Ocean BHSD
    17.94
    Inmarsat Indian Ocean B Voice/Data
    12.47
    Inmarsat Indian Ocean M
    15.84
    Inmarsat Indian Ocean Mini M
    12.47
    Inmarsat Pacific Ocean A Voice/Data
    11.31
    Inmarsat Pacific Ocean Aero
    12.47
    Inmarsat Pacific Ocean BHSD
    12.47
    Inmarsat Pacific Ocean B Voice/Data
    9.30
    Inmarsat Pacific Ocean M
    12.47
    Inmarsat Pacific Ocean Mini M
    9.30
    Inmarsat Unified B
    17.28
    Inmarsat Unified M
    15.84
    Inmarsat Unified Mini M
    12.47

  37. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    Me bad. Sorry. I meant Inmarsat.

    I think Inmarsat is quite a bit more reliable on the high seas. Because of wave action the antenna has to be stabilized which makes equipment a lot more expensive.

    D

  38. "Opening weekend" factor and testing by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    Typically the opening weekend of a movie dictates the maximum amount of money it will make. Consoles stay on the market for considerably longer than movies, but sales at introduction are still important. Sony helped guarantee success by selling in Japan first, where they were virtually guaranteed to succeed. By the time they initiated sales in the US they had a lot of positive buzz.

    There is something to be said about introducing your product in a smaller market as well. If you have any problems with the product you have time to fix them before starting sales in larger markets. We often rolled out our software enhancement to smaller user communities overseas before the US so that we could verify everything worked.

  39. Well... by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    If you subscribe to Verizon's 3G service (which uses CDMA, I believe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3G#CDMA_2000 ), you pay a flat $60 fee for unlimited usage.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Well... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      If you subscribe to Verizon's 3G service, you pay a flat $60 fee for unlimited usage.

      Mmm... competition... *forlornly reaches towards the light*

  40. 3G is not broadband by Mikaelk · · Score: 1

    3G is not broadband!

  41. For once South Africa... by demongp · · Score: 1

    ...is actually ahead of the US - Amazing!

    PS - For the people who don't know what i am talking about, South Africa has a history of taking a very long time to deploy advances in telecoms - mostly due to our EVIL incumbent Telco, Telkom making sure they are able to rape the South African Internet population for all they are worth. Which means that typically our Internet connectivity options plainly suck. For some more information on how bad they suck, you can visit Hellkom or MyADSL.

    However, we have actually had 3G technology over here for quite a couple of months already.

  42. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can actually get a broadband RV service for (if my memory serves) about $6500 for the service plus $150 a month but it appears not to work for boats, which is a real pity.

    You can get systems on the same service for boats. It just costs a bit more because the dish is in a gyro-stabilized bubble.

    You can get much cheaper hardware for RVs, if you're willing to spend an hour learning how to manually point the dish, and 15 minutes to set it up whenever you move. It's not as hard as professional installers say it is to align a dish. The $5000+ systems are for motorized GPS-enabled dishes that do it all for you. (Which is what I'm sure 99% of RV'ers want.)

  43. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by CeramicNuts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A 56k connection (or voice call) on Iridium is about $1 minute. It works almost anywhere in the world and at 35,000 feet. My company uses the motorola 9505 on aircraft and we use SMS and voice mostly because data is just so slow... but it is cheap, can be cheaper than international cellphone roaming charges!

  44. Large arial needed ? by o0ps · · Score: 1

    Will this work with current 3G phones which only need to be able to send a signal 10-20 miles to the nearest cell tower - rather than 22,000 odd miles to this satellite ? Or will you in fact need a nice bulky satellite phone to use this.

  45. I4 BGAN services require pointed antennas by volts · · Score: 2, Informative

    These comparisons to cellular data networks are a bit off the mark. Inmarsat's BGAN (Broadband Global Area Network) of which the I4 satellites are the space segment, only supports fixed applications. You need a directional antenna that is pointed at, and has clear line of site to, the satellite.

    The closest satellite equivalents to cell networks for voice are the Irridium and Thoria services. Irridium is heavily used for mobile data applications, but doesn't offer GPRS-like speeds or IP connectivity.

  46. High Latency? by TallMatthew · · Score: 1

    I don't have much experience with satellite-based networks but I've heard the latency makes them less-than-optimal. It doesn't matter how much pipe you have if it takes an eternity to get packets to and fro, especially if there's any packet loss (which assumedly there would be). Any interactive appliaction or protocol that used multiple simultaneous connections (like HTTP) would feel really slow.

    If this network is no better than bonding 28.8 modems together, what's the point?

  47. Brings a Tear to my Eye by justmiles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work on that launch project, Sea Launch. It was alot of hard work, but it was also alot of fun. http://www.sea-launch.com/ Novel to follow: For three to four weeks at a time we would put to sea, with the rocket resting peacefully in the hangar. During the one and a half week trip to the equator from Long Beach the crew would spend the time performing launch rehearsals and verifying their system readiness to support the launch. Needless to say there was plenty of time for recreation. Basketball, volleyball, table tennis, and spin classes in the cargo hold followed by poker and darts in the bar. But nothing beats launch day! You have been preparing for this day for the past three months. You have spent countless hours double-checking your launch procedure and launch support equipment. At L minus one hour it starts to get real intense. I take my usual position in front of the RF tracking station after launching the final weather balloon to check upper atmospheric winds. I watch my spectrum analyzers and AGC levels to ensure maximum signal quality. You take one final look over your shoulder at the rocket standing 6 kilometers away on the Launch Platform. Then the final countdown; 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, Launch! I see the position change in the signal and I engage autotrack, my fingers poised above the handwheels ready to take over should the autotrack fail. Finally the sound hits the ship and you see the equipment rack light up in this bright orange-yellow light, but you cannot look away from the antenna control. The next three minutes of telemetry data rest solely on your shoulders. Finally the call comes over the net, TDRS has picked up the signal; data recorders are switched to the NASA feed and you relax knowing that you job is done. You stow the antenna and secure your position before signing off the net to go party with the crew on the weather deck. And then there is the sail home, one week of the most absolute boredom you can ever experience. I read all 5 Harry Potter books in an row, twice, because I needed something to do. But eventually that passes and you hear that call of Catalina Island off of the starboard bow. Seeing the smog of LA is one of the sweetest sights of that whole trip. You take a couple of days to get to know your family again, and then do it all over again. Justin Miles Former Sea Launch RF Technician

  48. Re:Don't get too excited until you know the price by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

    The following site refers to the European BGAN network, but has some pricing info ($6.95 - 9.95 per MByte), which is a good indication of possible Western hemisphere pricing.

    http://www.outfittersatellite.com/rbgan.htm
    (can't get the HTML to work in preview, sorry)

    --
    --
  49. UK by scumbaguk · · Score: 1

    3G has been here in the UK for several years, I have a 3G data card in my laptop and I've got to say I'm impressed. For the most part it picks up a good 3G connection at 384kbs/s, fast enough to browse. It will use 8011.2g if availible otherwise 3G or failsover to GPRS.

    My package alows me something like 75MB a day for free and then you have to pay for extra bandwidth but as something to use on train/road for picking up emails, doing basic browsing it's perfect.
    Obviously this get's owned but the 24Mb/s ADSL2+ offered in the home but for a truely portable device that actualy has a large infrastructure built unlike 8011.2g it's not bad.

    3G coverage is obviously not quite the 99.9% that GPRS covers but it's getting there. Welcome to the modern world USA.