Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Receives IBM DB2 Certification

Khakionion writes "Ubuntu has announced their recent certification for IBM's DB2 Universal Database for Linux. Quite a big step for Ubuntu towards becoming one of the heavyweights of the Linux world." From the announcement: "With an respected product like DB2 on Ubuntu, our partners will relish the chance to discuss database and solution choices with their clients."

26 comments

  1. Ubuntu by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    Isn't Debian 3 already certified? So ubuntu which is based on Debian shouldnt be hard.

    I recently started playing with Ubuntu after seeing it climb to #1 on distrowatch.com, and I must say, very nice. Made me switch from Mandriva, and I wont touch Gentoo again after this. SuSE seems a little more polished, but debian has more packages.

    Also think I'll dump gentoo, really liking having all the packages I need and not compiling. Going to try sparc debian tomorrow at work, kinda interested to see how the install goes.

  2. Unfaithful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be back with Gentoo, you'l be back...

  3. Simplicity is the key to Ubuntu's success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I flipped my cigarette into the curbside gutter and looked down the street, watching the rain through dim streetlight. I was in the east side of Portland, deep in old suburbia; stucco homes on one side and a large trailer lot on the other. The remains of drive-time traffic in late April could be heard in the distance on I 84, its noise a thankful muffle to possible cries in the night. I stiffened with the dread of things to come as a bus pulled to a stop 50 yards away. A lone female figure got off, stretched her legs, lit a cigarette and took a deep drag.

    Tonya Harding walked in my direction. I'd been waiting for 20 minutes, standing silently by the sidewalk under dripping alder branches. Tonya was on her way home and here I was, ready to intercept her, change our lives forever. Or so that was the plan.

    Her apartment was two blocks down and one over but I didn't want this to happen there. I had plans and we must keep to them. Anyway, best to take her for myself, alone where I could do with her what I wanted with little chance someone would find us there in the apartment.

    Here it is, I thought, as Tonya was just about upon me, the moment, the time, the act, my moment with Tonya Harding. Would I chicken out, allow her to pass, never knowing if I could pull it off? My hesitation left in an instant, filed away as unimportant. Careful though, I thought, I don't want her to see me at the last instant and run down the street screaming bloody murder. But of course, that would all be an act. I waited until she had just passed me then, at the last possible instant, I grabbed her from behind my right hand over her mouth, strong and determined so she couldn't scream, my left arm around her waist, pulled her backward, away from the street, down an incline.

    As we rolled a couple times and slid the rest of the way down the hill, a truck sped by on the street above with a wail of wind and oily mist. Tonya was stronger than she looked, stronger than even the Tomboy persona the world knew so well. She struggled furiously as we slid into the ditch into a mass of bushes. She was still, unmoving, a lump on soggy ground. Either she had hit her head on an oblong rock or she was pretending to be knocked out. I placed a cold hand over her neck; she was alive breathing, eyes open but was she conscious?

    We were out of sight from above, in a four by eight foot clearing in the middle of a small stand of bushes and wet grass. Cars passed above with their wet tire sounds, reflected yellow headlights and distant street lights shone over Tonya's muddy form. I touched her neck and her long, wavy blonde hair and I began to remove her soiled denim jacket.

    I took comfort in knowledge that she was breathing steadily, evenly but Tonya looked different here on her back, somehow frail and small. What had I done? Was she okay. Should I stop now, do something, run away. She was breathing, alive, mine. I couldn't stop. I had to continue. I had this cute female body to myself and I was gonna fuck it!

    I tore her blouse off, buttons popped and I thought I heard or at least felt Tonya gasp or respond a bit. I'm not sure. I was busy with the sudden pleasure of my cock growing huge while I saw Tonya being undressed by myself. Her skin glistened naked smudges of mud and wetness ran over her ribs, soaking her bra. I searched for the fastener, pulled her bra off, gasped at her naked breasts, then kissed each, warm and tender on my face, my tongue sliding over her large nipples. I could feel some movement from her chest. The latch of her tight jeans opened easily, pulled them off with great pleasure. Next came her shoes and socks. There was something so pleasurable in seeing her naked toes. Now, except for her white panties she was exposed, naked.

    Days of careful planning had come to this moment. I had no mind for mistakes. My heart pounded as my fingers fumbled, both hands shaking. I could hardly breath I was so excited, scared with what I was doing. I was weak with pleasure, the thrill of excitement and the site of T

  4. How important? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How important are these kinds of certifications really? I assume they are really just a fancy way of saying "we support our software on this platform and are prepared to sell support and consulting services for our system running on it". If $LARGE_CORP decides to run, say, db2 on a system that isn't certified, wouldn't IBM be happy to take their money for support and such anyway - probably with an added surcharge due to the lack of certification, but on the other hand with a rebate for being $LARGE_CORP rather than $SMALL_FRY?

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:How important? by sydb · · Score: 1

      You need to learn to think like a manager. Not all the time, of course, just for the sake of role play.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:How important? by worf_mo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any large corporation is more likely to select an already certified system. For technical reasons as well as political ones (CYA).

    3. Re:How important? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "How important are these kinds of certifications really?"

      It is not important, but essential when working on corporate environments.

      "I assume they are really just a fancy way of saying "we support our software on this platform and are prepared to sell support and consulting services for our system running on it"

      No: it is more saying we WON'T sell support and consulting UNLESS we previously said so (via a certification).

      While it should be less of an issue when talking about open software (others will do what you don't want to), it is a must when talking about privative software, like it it the current case.

      And it is currently a "clever" path for a "corporate distribution" to follow. An example: I work for a consultancy firm and we usually go with Red Hat when a client needs/wants say Oracle support. I would prefer using Debian, but the client mandates (and rightly so) a certified platform when it wants to deploy Oracle. But then, it means that our bosses prefer to go with CentOS when certification/support is not an issue in order to take advantage of our Red Hat "know-how". In the end it means that our company is much more savvy with Red Hat-like distributions, so in the end Red Hat gains kind of a "lock in" on us.

      Maybe Ubuntu going this path will mean that in the future we will be able to go with the Ubuntu/Debian tandem instead of Red Hat/CentOS.

  5. I agree, this is a DUH move. by ChrisMroz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many of us have family that dont play games but are computer illiterate? So many distros have managed to meet the criteria for a so-called perfect OS alternative. Ubuntu is it... or if you dont think its it, it will be. Near perfect project management and one of the best foundations to build on, Ubuntu isn't going anywhere. Good job IBM, here's a cookie. While I'm not staying away from gentoo or my flavor of slack(SLAMD64! w00t,) I will be putting more fear in the eyes of my WinONLY friends just because I know finally I can provide them with an alternative that can relate to them. While Novell and RedHat has done a great job, I think Ubuntu will be the open source monster that most of us have been waiting for. Who woulda thunk it! With a name like Ubuntu!

    1. Re:I agree, this is a DUH move. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Ubuntu isn't going anywhere"

      That's still to be seen.

      Ubuntu had an easy start since they had a ton of money and an almost finished product (that date's Debian Sarge, which was almost frozen). Now Ubuntu is going away from Debian Stable (since they more or less follow Testing/Unstable) and the effects of using a more beta-quality master are already noticeable: Breezy Badger (current Ubuntu) is quite unpolished (few days ago I made a "clean install" then I tried to install KDE just to see it was not possible due to broken dependencies, for instance; that would never happen with Debian: they'd either distribute a *functional* KDE or no KDE at all). For Ubuntu to stay the "up to date easy Debian-like distribution" they seem wanting to be, it will mean they will have to through more and more money and more and more human force (they will be able to take less and less directly from Debian). For companies like Red Hat or SuSE it meant being almost at bankruptcy for *years*. Since now Linux is much more known and widely deployed than in the days RH or SuSE started maybe Ubuntu has a chance to abandon red numbers faster but, well, as I said at the beginning of this, that's still to be seen: it can be a succesful "corporate distribution", or it can go the way of, say, Progeny (which already tried to take the same niche).

    2. Re:I agree, this is a DUH move. by spxero · · Score: 0

      After what I've seen in Ubuntu, the only reason I still have windows is for gaming.
      Out of the box it has everything that I would need. Next time grandma needs a rebuild(due to adware/spyware), I'll set her up with Kubuntu and the Redmond theme. Ubuntu has made Linux easy to use for the windows-only crowd, and I hope they keep running with it.

  6. Compiling Anyway by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At this point, I've been having so many dependency issues with apt and yum, that 70% of the time, I end up compiling from source anyway. So I'm in fact moving to Gentoo. I'm sure it won't be a paneaca of all my dependency ills, but the way things stand I'm practically running a custom compiled system anyway.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Compiling Anyway by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Debian's package management isn't good because of apt (or even aptitude): It is good because of the repository and package management process.

    2. Re:Compiling Anyway by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i've been using debian for 4 years now ... i admit i like the apt as it is and the dependancy issues can usually be resolved with some effort.

      but the thing that bothers me is that debian is lately lagging far behind of the actual releases. for example, when slashdot was writing that 1.0.x version of firefox is invulnerable to something and all the previous versions too, then sitting on 1.0.(x-2) doesn't really feel good, and the waiting 2 months to get the upgrade smells funny.

      tried out gentoo lately too ... imho it rocks. yea people dont like building the stuff all the time, but that is the choice you have to take when it comes down to staying on the bleeding edge. sometimes you even want to choose stuff that isn't bleeding edge but is defacto standard, like x.org, but debian had enormous problems to break off from the xfree86 server (and i'm not even now sure that it has braken off from it, i use ubuntu packages right now...)

      the thing that really annoys is that mplayer tends to break all the time if installed from packages, so i compile that one myself and only update it if really breaks down (not when the package manager decides that it shouldnt be here anymore). and marillat tends to change the directories from time to time :s

      if debian breaks this lagging behind and gets some improvement to the dependancy problems it's probably one of the best distros out there.

      commercial distros i just dislike and once i saw dpkg i never looked at rpm hell again ( and i hope never will have to look at it again :D ).

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    3. Re:Compiling Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i admit i like the apt as it is and the dependancy issues can usually be resolved with some effort."

      You really had bad luck! I NEVER had a dependency issue with Stable. If you are not using Stable, then you shouldn't have any question, since you were using "beta" quality software to start with.

    4. Re:Compiling Anyway by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Just replace the final make install with checkinstall and you can install your compiled from source app as a package with all the happy modularity and ease of use that comes from a package manager. I'm not telling you not to go to Gentoo, just tossing a seldom considered option.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Compiling Anyway by stevey · · Score: 1

      Definitely seconded. I wrote a tutorial on using checkinstall for Debian which explains how it works with a small example.

      99% of the time I use Debian's excellent package repository, but for the remaining 1% checkinstall is the way to go, as it lets you deal with your package in the normal manner.

    6. Re:Compiling Anyway by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      If you have dependency problems in Debian, you need to learn how to use you distro. Seriously. Let me recycle this comment. Or look into the docs. (4th link on google for 'debian "security fix" version' btw.).

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  7. Nice, but irrelevant... by samj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because distributions and vendors should be targeting the Linux Standards Base. IMO announcements like this are a step back for standards and remind me of the days we were hearing similar statements from RedHat.

    1. Re:Nice, but irrelevant... by turbidostato · · Score: 0, Troll

      "because distributions and vendors should be targeting the Linux Standards Base"

      Why they should?
      1/ LSB's only benefit is with respecting binary closed source software. But there're no sign that closed source vendors are going to support LSB at all: there's almost no software that officially support say LSB 1.0, and even when a company won't tell you they support Red Hat, but Red Hat ES 3.0 for instance.
      2/ Last I reviewed we were on a capitalist society, thus no company should be doing nothing (not legally bound to) but trying to maximize profit. The day companies see targeting LSB is a way for maximizing profit, don't worry, they'll do.

  8. Psh, who cares by elasticwings · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    MySQL is what everybody should be moving to anyways. We only have DB2 on a server because somebody else's crappy product only works with it.

  9. Support for Wikis by faqmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now all we need is to get Wiki support for DB2 on Amiga.

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
  10. MOD +1 FUNNY by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Except I've a horrible feeling you're probably serious.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  11. Offtopic by SilverspurG · · Score: -1, Troll

    Holy cow you mods are such weenies. You're killing Next Up with overrated. What is this? A coup? Are you jealous because I started claiming IP before you even thought of it?

    What gives? Bunch of weirdos... all of you.

    *blows you a big fat raspberry*

    Don't think I haven't watched you do this before. You're so childish that it's amusing each and every time.

    --
    fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    1. Re:Offtopic by SilverspurG · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Over the last 6 hours I've watched that post go from 1-5-4-5-4. The silly part is that it's completely truthful and the mods still kick it.

      What would you do if the ref were easily trollable? :) From the ref's perspective, you'd mod it down.

      Mods are easily trolled.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  12. Is parent trolling? by jonasj · · Score: 1
    You won't get any dependency problems installing KDE on Breezy. That's a plain lie.

    And this:
    Ubuntu had an easy start since they had a ton of money and an almost finished product (that date's Debian Sarge, which was almost frozen).
    Wrong: All Ubuntu releases, including the first one, was based on Debian Unstable.
    --
    You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
    1. Re:Is parent trolling? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "You won't get any dependency problems installing KDE on Breezy. That's a plain lie."

      Well, you can tell *others* this is a lie, but you can't tell that to me.

      I *did* install Ubuntu (which installed Gnome by default using the "standard" procedure), I *did* executed `apt-get update` and `apt-get install kde` and I *did* get a broken dependencies message.

      You can believe it or not; you can even test it by yourself, but you *cannot* tell me what I did and what did I saw with my own eyes.

      "Wrong: All Ubuntu releases, including the first one, was based on Debian Unstable."

      Yes; on a date when Testing and Unstable were basically the same due to Debian being frozen and Unstable not accepting anything too critical due to this (like Xorg or gcc 4 which were going into Experimental).

      I'll repeat it: the farer Ubuntu is from current Debian Stable, the more work Ubuntu people will have to do to insure stability and integration for their releases (since they won't be able to rely so much on the "parent" distribution), and it is still to be seen if Ubuntu will have the power/interest on doing it.