Slashdot Mirror


Google Base Launches

An anonymous reader writes "As announced on the Google Blog, Google Base has finally launched. According to Google, Google Base enables content owners to easily make their information searchable online. Anyone, from large companies to website owners and individuals, can use it to submit their content in the form of data items. We'll host the items and make them searchable for free."

37 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your Google base are belong to us.

    1. Re:Has to be said by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Balmer retorts: You have no chance to survive make your time.

    2. Re:Has to be said by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jobs exclaims: What you say?

    3. Re:Has to be said by Deathbane27 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cache all 'Zig'!

      --
      If it ain't broke, it needs more features!
    4. Re:Has to be said by S.+Ballmer · · Score: 1, Funny

      Someone set up us the chair!

    5. Re:Has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      When will this joke ever die?

      You have no chance to survive make your time.

    6. Re:Has to be said by flibble-san · · Score: 4, Funny

      Google: Hahaha

      --
      My other sig is crap too
    7. Re:Has to be said by jZnat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sony: main screen turn on.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    8. Re:Has to be said by dcapel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot says: You know what you doing.

      --
      DYWYPI?
  2. Oh great by fmwap · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, so now our top results are going to be clutered with samples of the info we're really looking for

    Thanks, google

    1. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, if you're going to hassle Google, you're going to get modded down. You must be new here.

  3. Re:Good for 'public' sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well obviously. Why would Google deliberately introduce a service that would obviate the need for

  4. Re:World Domination by yamum · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah but it'll be a government running Linux!

  5. Just sayin... by GreggyBUIUC · · Score: 4, Funny
  6. I'm disappointed... by HellsAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

    for a minute there I thought they were finally launching Copernicus Center, their Lunar base.

    --
    WTF?
  7. Re:Data integrity by quokkapox · · Score: 2, Funny
    Does anyone know what they are planning on doing to make sure data is up to date? I can just see things happening like a school putting up all of their course information and not keeping it up to date.

    Yes, because the web itself contains no broken links and no outdated information. It would be criminal to pollute such a reliable resource.
    --
    Kerry/Edwards 2004 !!!!! I love SONY!!!!

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  8. druggle by grungebox · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if we can use Google Base for free, does that mean we can free base? Far out, man.

  9. Re:It sounds great, just like Wikipedia by mateomiguel · · Score: 2, Funny

    These days, my experiences on the internet make me wonder how the world itself can survive under a heavy load of spam, honest mistakes, and deliberate mischief. Can someone explain that to me?

  10. Obligatory by Pesh+Hawksfire · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm in your google base. I'm killing your google mans!

  11. Re:Good for 'public' sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great! Now you can search for people in your local area selling their souls:

    http://base.google.com/base/search?q=souls+for+sal e

  12. It's broken. by melikamp · · Score: 4, Funny

    I cannot find any porn. I think it is broken.

  13. Re:API? by masdog · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's sort of like putting your money in a piggybank -- a piggybank not in your bedroom, but on *the other side of town*.

    Like a bank?

  14. Google Beanie Babies? by adnonsense · · Score: 2, Funny

    A random search reveals a new aspect to Google's business operations: http://base.google.com/base/items?oid=152787692968 78035551

  15. Re:Scary Pace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dude, this is the new monopoly coming in. Google$ it will be called on Slashdot anytime soon.

    Ehh ... you mean on Googledot :-)

  16. Re:...but for how long? by sunwolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    A stretch, but I like it. When do the Crusades start?

  17. Re:Scary Pace by panaceaa · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would be useful if they actually provided some simple notification of updates to the services they provide

    They do, it's called the Slashdot home page. In fact, there's even a simple reminder mechanism called Google Dupes.

  18. Re:World Domination by SausageOfDoom · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're already running our governments, or at least the people behind Google are.

    They couldn't read our brains with their satellite beams, because we out-smarted them with our protective foil hats. Instead they created a puppet company to create a popular search engine, and now they wait for people to send in their thoughts so they can combine them with their satellite images and records of our email and shopping habits.

    But I'm onto you! You won't catch me running your desktop search!

  19. Match.com = match.gone? by blankoboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this the beginning of the end for internet dating companies?

  20. Re:Good for 'public' sites by jrockway · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> in high demand. The [...]
    > obviate the need for [...]

    Q: How many ADD kids does it take to change a light bulb?
    A: Hey, wanna go ride bikes? ;)

    --
    My other car is first.
  21. Re:Hmm...Porn? by Al_Lapalme · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your use of the word 'most' disturbs me

    --
    Al
  22. Re:World Domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Isn't the Arabic term for "base" ...

    ... Al-Qaeda?

  23. Re:easfdq by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Funny
    (about the subject title... my cat wrote it just now when he jumped onto my laptop, and it seemed as good as anything I was about to come up with)
    Maybe there should be a new moderators option (+2 Pussy)
  24. Re:Good for 'public' sites by n54 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Interesting... would this person happen to be you? http://base.google.com/base/items?oid=674339201900 4287296

    It states: "You have my word on that my soul is pure and clean. I have never commited any sins or other bad acts, so please skip the 2 cents offers."
    but I would contend he has already in the ad made at least the following sins:
    - lying (about never ever having done anything even remotely bad)
    - selling his soul (a sin in the eyes of a overwhelmingly large portion of religious humans, incidentally the group that are most likely to accept the concept of a soul in the first place, and many of whom would not even accept the validity of trying to sell it or that the seller is actually the owner of his own soul)

    So the soul is obviously not in mint condition :) Has the person ever had a heartache? Any kind of trauma or other bad experiences? Denied God, Satan or any other such entity? Number of reincarnations if any? The list goes on and on to make an attempted appraisal. It seems obvious that the person is a virgin physically, that's at least one selling point but it would need to be documented to affect the selling price :)

    Most buyers would probably want a guarantee on the souls condition from a higher authority if quality is meant to be a selling point.

    In addition there is little product information, nor any guarantee or expiration date (the expiration date would be the time for which the seller could guarantee conferred ownership of the soul). If such a date is unknown to the seller many buyers could arrange such a date for their own purposes as long as it does not include any reverse transferral back to the seller. And most important of all the seller has not defined exactly what his soul is, most buyers would for example feel that they could litigate if buying the soul does not imply a full 100% direct control over the sellers soul at all times including all which that implies (by tradition; the sellers thoughts, actions, feelings, senses and soforth).

    And what of those who would be interested in buying the soul for official purposes such as proving they have a soul (at least one)? If you have a deed to a human soul (even if transfer has not occured yet) could one not claim to be eligible to human rights, nationality, etceterea? Perhaps absurd right here and now but some time in the future it might not be, it could be a legal loophole for synthetic intelligences to gain human rights if otherwise denied such. All of this is a seperate futures market but does make it neccessary that the sale has an approved legal status in whatever human justice system the sale takes place, the seller needs to provide documentation to such effect if this is the market he's going for.

    Any possibilites of "try before you buy"? What are the delivery arrangements?

    What are the contractual agreements for exchange of the money and the soul? Almost all buyers would agree to an infinite sum if the transfer is immediate and includes the traditional implications.

    The seller should be noted that all things considered the likely buyers would want the traditional contractual arrangements and a signature in the sellers blood witnessed by the buyer or representatives and confirmed by DNA comparison of the blood with three sample biopsis from any part of the sellers body, internal or external.

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
  25. Re:Good for 'public' sites by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, I have ADD you insensitive

  26. Re:Good for 'public' sites by jZnat · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, ADD

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  27. When you are in the Comfy Chair by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    --
    "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
  28. How sad that I still know the lines... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Darl: Take off every 'GPL'. For great lawsuit.