Slashdot Mirror


Space.com's Top 10 Space Movies of All Time

Comatose51 writes "Space.com has posted a Top 10 Space Movies of All Time list based on reader ratings on each movie. Apollo 13 is currently the #1 movie, followed by Star Trek: First Contact at #2, and Wrath of Khan at #3. I was surprised by Apollo 13 at #1, since I initially equated space movies with sci-fi. However, I don't disagree with it. What do other Slashdotters think, or suggest as good space movies?"

17 of 539 comments (clear)

  1. Serenity! by PsychicX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think Serenity hasn't been around long enough to sink in to the culture properly, but god, such a good movie. Firefly was a good series too.

    1. Re:Serenity! by BrynM · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think Serenity hasn't been around long enough to sink in to the culture properly, but god, such a good movie. Firefly was a good series too.
      I have a pair of friends (BF/GF unit) that aren't into sci-fi at all. She is arguably the least sci-fi person I have known in a long time. She admits to seeing "that trek thing" but didn't like it. He's just not interested usually.

      First the boyfriend saw a couple of episodes of Firefly with me (I have the DVDs) and got really exited to see Serenity. I took them both. The very next day they borrowed my DVD set and watched all of Firefly for the next week.

      I'm sure there of hundreds of stories like mine. Give that movie/series to pretty much anyone and I'll bet they like it. It's got a broad appeal and no weird looking costumes. Everyone can identify with working hard (even if what you do is nefarious) and having to defend it in some way. That's it's essence. Within 2-5 years it will be a landmark film, IMHO.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  2. Order... by The+Madd+Rapper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First Contact before Empire Strikes Back? I liked them both, but c'mon now. Overall I think the top ten are solid choices, but the order leaves a little to be desired.

    --
    That's the shit that feds me up
  3. Since it doesn't have to be science fiction by jbrader · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then I nominate "The Right Stuff". Also I think this list is a little too Star Trek heavy (but I'm probably in the minority on that).

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  4. 2001 was a great movie by zymano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    2001 is one of the best scifi movies.

    Also don't forget StarTrek the motion picture. The original was long in spots but none of the others were as deep. The ending was great.

  5. The list compilers are on drugs. by Mateito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They missed Airplane II. Easily the best space movie EVER!

  6. No 5th Element?? by Tmack · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Futuristic with lots of space stuff in it (you know, the whole dark planet, FTL travel to other planets, etc). A Great Sci-Fi movie with excellent scene changes and decent plot (even brief nudity), and even though one of the main characters is Bruce Willis, it still came out great IMHO, it just didnt do well in the theaters (probably due to lack of publicity, I only remember a few commercials for it).

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  7. Probably too "cult" for such a list ... by tim_uk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but what about Dark Star? Come on people, it was co-written by Dan O'Bannon, who later reused the "alien mascot" section of the film as the basis of his script for Alien FFS!!

    Directed by (the) John Carpenter as well.

    And then there's Silent Running, although wabbits being nuked is probably not a big vote winner among the majority of popcorn-crunchers.

    Spaceballs forever!

  8. In my opinion by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting
    2001 is the best one. Even better if you consider when it was made and what you could compare it with! Not that the other ones are bad either.

    When you consider that this film was made in 1968 it wasn't until 1977 when Star Wars appeared that you could get something to actually compare with in quality. And even though that film is almost forty years old it is still a film that you can watch. The only thing that it actually missed was the political situation in the world of today, but wh coul tell that at a time when the Soviet Union was at it's height and al-Qaeda wasn't known. The worst terrorists at the time was PLO and Lebanon was a holiday paradise.

    Personally I don't give much for the Alien films, but it's a matter of taste.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:In my opinion by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally I don't give much for the Alien films, but it's a matter of taste.

      The reason I think it's there is because 'space movies' are mostly about life in space.

      The original Alien film exposed a lot of possibilities, and left a lot of questions unanswered. The biology of the Alien creature was so bizarre and unfamiliar...it seemed as if maybe the laws of chemistry and physics were being broken, but then again...maybe they weren't. This was something that noone had seen before, or imagined...and instead of being another movie with a 'guy in a rubber suit' the director managed to create something horrifyingly believable. Bottom line: The film does an excellent job of consistently maintaining its plausibility, which is very hard to do in science fiction.

      Some people liken Alien to a 'haunted house movie' in space, but the film also succeeds in creating a deep sense of uncertainty and lack of knowledge about space. It asks the question, what do we really know about what's out there? Most other 'space films' mess that part up, and 'earth-apomorphize' space. Alien however, is truly alien.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  9. iMDB's verdict by ishnaf · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Trawling throught the iMDB top 250 filmsi got this list:
    1. Star Wars 4
    2. Star wars 5
    3. Alien
    4. Aliens (the sequel to Aliens)
    5. 2001: A Space Oddysey
    6. Blade Runner (well if Contact is on the list, why not this?)
    7. Star Wars 6
    8. Star Wars 3
    9. Planet of the Apes (1968 version)
    Yes, i've gone against convention and used digits not roman numerals for the Star Wars films. I'd be interested to see are larger list - Star Wars/Trek domaination makes it seem more like a top 5.
  10. Well... by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I find it very sad, that the list contains little less than a bunch of star wars/star treck movies. Who was the voting audience? Space Odyssey only #5? No Aliens? (OK, at least Alien is on the list). Where is "Blade Runner"? "Total Recall"? "Dark Star"? Hell, even "Stargate" or "Starship Troopers" deserved to get on that list more than some other entries ("Contact", for example, is a very good book, but a mediocre movie - to say the least).

  11. I want real astronomy in my space movies by btempleton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought Serenenity was a very good movie, which leaves me more annoyed that like effectively all hollywood SF movies, it had no real concept of astronomy, how really far it is between planets in a solar system. (Or how vastly far it is in a galaxy, which Firefly sometimes declared to be its setting.)

    A solar system is not like a western frontier where you meet other ships along the trail. And a solar system with hundreds of moons around many planets will have, depending on the place in the orbit, immense vast distances between planets on opposite sides of the star, and relatively short ones between moons, but still a vast void on all trips. You are not going to happen to run into Reaver ships.

    Now as I said, most shows get this really wrong. To some extent the shows with FTL get it "better" even though FTL is itself fantasy, at least you get a reason to not treat the differences as so vast. Hyperspace jumps, another fantasy, are even better.

    2001 got space right. Apollo 13 did (duh.) Few other films and very few TV shows ever did.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:I want real astronomy in my space movies by John_Booty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought Serenenity was a very good movie, which leaves me more annoyed that like effectively all hollywood SF movies, it had no real concept of astronomy

      I really appreciate science realism in movies, but I also enjoy space/sci-fi movies that just have fun instead of sticking to science facts.

      Mixing hard science with entertaining narrative is almost impossibly hard due to the fact that well, space really is a bleak, vast, nearly-featureless void. 2001 is the only film I can think of that did this successfully, and swashbuckling tales like Star Wars, Serenity, or Firefly would never work with larger doses of reality.

      On a "science realism" note, one nice touch in Firefly was that the space scenes had no sound, since obviously there's no sound in space. They broke with that for Serenity, though.

      Another sci-fi story that adds a little hard science to the mix is the anime series Gunbuster. Near-lightspeed travel features prominently in the plot, and - surprise! - the relativistic time effects are actually handled in a fairly realistic fashion. A large part of the plot deals with the emotional hardships of the characters, whose friends back on Earth are aging much more quickly than they are since they frequently travel near light speeds.

      It's regarded as one of the greatest anime productions of all time. Sadly, it's currently commercially unavailable in the U.S. although it can be downloaded...

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  12. Re:Gattaca! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Interesting


    It should have been there on the list. 'Contact' sucks, really, except for '22 hours of static on the tape'.

    Seeing as this whole "news" item is just an invitation for a flamefest anyway, I would rate Contact as easily the best of the ten films listed. It has the most interesting and original premise in it, it has the most coherent internal logic, it has the strongest basis in science (and yes - I am aware of the ending), it is the best acted (*cough*Star Wars / Star Trek*cough*), and it has the strongest emotional engagement with the characters.

    If Aliens rather than Alien was in the list, I might give that equal place for different reasons - it's just Hellishly good fun ("They cut the power? How could they cut the power?"). Alien is also very good, but not as good as Contact.

    I haven't seen Apollo-13 though, because Tom Hanks disturbs me. He looks like a serial killer.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  13. Re:Serenity by shawb · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Fox did the same thing to Arrested Development.

    Fox: We're going to cancel your show because there wasn't enough viewership this season.

    Arrested Development: But you didn't actually air anything, we were co-opted by baseball, a sport which nobody watches anyways.

    Fox: And that is our problem how?

    Fox has a long history of screwing with the schedule of a potentially great show and then cancelling it because the ratings drop. Firefly, Arrested Development, Futurama, The Critic, The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr, and they keep trying to drop Family Guy. On the other end, they keep showing tripe like MadTV (never saw anything funny on there, just horrible acting, mugging for the camera, and flat out insulting situations) and Malcolm in the Middle. Somewhere in the middle they let series that were once good run way longer than they should after all the creativity is gone and the shark has been jumped over and over: Married With Children, Simpsons, That 70's show, 21 Jump Street, Beverly Hills 90210, arguably the X-files, arguably King of the Hill.

    On the other hand, they are the only network to give a lot of programming a chance that other networks wouldn't have touched... everything I mentioned above plus Boston Public, Dark Angel, Get a Life, Herman's Head, Normal Ohio, Parker Lewis Can't Lose, etc etc etc (not claiming the quality of these, but that other broadcasters probably wouldn't have touched them.) Also, I'll give Fox credit for not starting the whole reality TV thing (That's MTV's fault, or CBS bringing Survivor in) but when they do bite on it, it's horrid, soulless stuff like Trading Spouses, Renovate my Family, The Simple Life and The Swan (the Swan being possibly one of the most evil shows on. Take a bunch of ugly to average looking women with low self esteem. Give them makeovers, plastic surgery, wardrobe changes, etc. Finally, tell all but one of them that they're still not good enough. Vile and disgusting. Not to mention that usually once you get plastic surgery, after a couple years you grow out of it and need to get it again otherwise you look worse than you otherwise would have.)
    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  14. Re:CONTACT by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, she had recorded hours and hours of static. That suggests something had happened in the 0 seconds of earth-time she was away.

    Prior to that revelation, however, she, the scientist, finds herself in a situation not unlike that of her religious friend - she's just had a life-changing experience, she knows she's had it - yet all she has left to go by at that point is, it seems, faith. No evidence, no anything. Had everything been explained, had there been certainty, or had it been yet another little space adventure, the movie would have missed its own point. I'm not sure I agree with that point, nor is it a particularly brilliant point, but I did enjoy that movie more than any of the others in that list.

    (I also find Khaaan painfully dull, for reasons I could not adequately explain, so shoot me already.)

    That wasn't her dead father, btw., it was an alien lifeform masquerading as her father to "make it easier for her" (whether that makes sense or not) and, perhaps, to make it more mysterious for us. Frankly, I liked how there were but a few scant hints at an interstellar transport network, no more than a short glimpse or two of an illuminated alien city... in a way this was more impressive and felt a lot larger than the over-crowded scenery of several Star Wars films combined.