Slashdot Mirror


CSI Takes On Grand Theft Auto

Tycoon Guy was one of many to write "Looks like another 20 million viewers will be fed the 'video games promote violence' story tonight. Today's CSI: Miami episode will feature a group of kids who are inspired to go on a city-wide crime spree by a game that looks suspiciously like Grand Theft Auto. From the description: 'Delko witnesses a bank robbery and the CSIs soon discover that the culprits are playing out the action from the videogame 'Urban Hellraisers' on the streets of Miami. As they score points for each crime committed, the CSIs must discover what consists of getting to the next level in the game in order to stop the culprits before they strike again.'"

41 of 595 comments (clear)

  1. Eh... so what? by XorNand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think that the debate isn't so much about whether video games inspire people to go on crime sprees (which is only the aspect that the CSI episode seems to address). Most of us agree that they can. Just like a violent movie, booze, extremely stressful situtation, etc. can push a person already with a few screws loose over the edge. The question is: Do video games make killers? And if so (and that's a big if) where does the line between social conditioning and personal responsiblity lay?

    Anyhow, I wouldn't be in such a hurry to throw up your arms over this show. Knowing CSI, I doubt that they're going to devote much airtime into exploring the social and moral issues surrounding the debate. The focus of the show isn't the same as Law & Order, which is a bit more far reaching.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:Eh... so what? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think most of us will agree that video games are no more likely to inspire kids to go on a killing spree any more then violent TV Shows and Movies or an episode of "Barney & Friends."

      However unlike the aforementioned Video Games have been noted in studies for reducing the subject's likelihood of displaying violent behavior, because the game serves as a release mechanism.

      All this is is scapegoatism led by asshats like Jack Thompson.

    2. Re:Eh... so what? by dsginter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Knowing CSI, I doubt that they're going to devote much airtime into exploring the social and moral issues surrounding the debate.

      Knowing CSI, I think that they'll devote more time exploring the intricacies involved in the "reverse algorithmic" required to make that 320x200 security camera zoom in 3000x with perfect clarity.

      If nothing else, CSI is good for scaring criminals into thinking that this kind of technology actually exists.

      --
      More
    3. Re:Eh... so what? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but "Barney and Friends" is MUCH more likely to send me on a killing spreee than your average violent video game.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Eh... so what? by HunterZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, Law & Order did an episode on video game violence last year as well. Who cares? Does anyone really get their political beliefs from TV shows?

      I'm guessing you're not an American.

      (My Fellow Americans: I am American, BTW, so don't get bent out of shape)

      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    5. Re:Eh... so what? by paranode · · Score: 4, Funny
      My Fellow Americans: I am American

      God Bless you and the freedom you stand for!

    6. Re:Eh... so what? by deacon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Things are much worse than that.

      Some people actually believe the "News" that is on TV.

    7. Re:Eh... so what? by jmp_nyc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's good that we've got so many morally upright people in this country to make sure that people understand that modern secularized entertainment is solely responsible for the proliferation of violence in our society. After all, there would be no violence or crime if people only read the Bible like God intended.

      Of course, most of these people haven't read the Bible sufficiently closely to notice that it's chock full of sex and violence, much of it downright gratuitous.
      -JMP

    8. Re:Eh... so what? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Dude - you gotta check out this Barny mod for Doom!"
      "OK - let me fire it up. Huh... cool. Barnys to kill left and right. Heh. I like using the shotgun."

      (...boom...boom...sploitch...)

      "Dadddy..."
      "Oh... hi Kiddo. What'cha want?"
      "Daddy... is that Barny...?"
      "..."

    9. Re:Eh... so what? by p0rnking · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If TV (and other media) doesn't inspire some people to commit crime, then explain this http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,975 769,00.html.

      "Four years ago, Bhutan, the fabled Himalayan Shangri-la, became the last nation on earth to introduce television. Suddenly a culture, barely changed in centuries, was bombarded by 46 cable channels. And all too soon came Bhutan's first crime wave - murder, fraud, drug offences."

    10. Re:Eh... so what? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think most of us will agree that video games are no more likely to inspire kids to go on a killing spree any more then violent TV Shows and Movies or an episode of "Barney & Friends."
      So what's the problem? If people aren't inspired by fiction (as you state), then anything CSI says about videogames will be taken as fiction by its viewers and have no influence on public policy. Right?

      Now, you could argue some viewers won't distinguish CSI from reality, but then you'd have to admit the possibility of the same for GTA.

    11. Re:Eh... so what? by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If TV (and other media) doesn't inspire some people to commit crime, then explain this...

      Well, if we grant the assumption for the moment that it was exposure to television that caused the crime wave, would you care to comment on what aspect of television was responsible? Was it cable news that caused a crime wave? Was it exposure to Barney? Was it the introduction of televangelists? Was it violent entertainment? Was it horror movies? Was it McDonald's commercials?

      Or did it have nothing to do with the television itself? Was it the influx of foreign cable company employees?

      Was it the major cultural shift that drove Bhutan to permit television in the first place? Was televion the only new thing to happen in Bhutan?

      Also, how can we reconcile the article's statement "...a culture, barely changed in centuries..." with "there were no public hospitals or schools until the 1950s, and no paper currency, roads or electricity until several years after that. Bhutan had no diplomatic relations with any other country until 1961, and the first invited western visitors came only in 1974"?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    12. Re:Eh... so what? by rpdillon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, you touch on the heart of the debate and treat as though the resolution were a fait accompli. Here is another section of the article:

      Every week, the letters page carries columns of worried correspondence: "Dear Editor, TV is very bad for our country... it controls our minds... and makes [us] crazy. The enemy is right here with us in our own living room. People behave like the actors, and are now anxious, greedy and discontent."

      This is in direct contradiction of one of my beliefs, and even some beliefs that are taught to even the youngest members of our society: personal responsiblity. The TV didn't make these people do anything, they did it of their own volition. The lesson we teach our children is to think on their own: "If little Johnny jumped off the bridge, would you jump off too?" We reinforce this mantra time after time in various ways: your decisions are your own; don't blindly follow what you see others doing.

      And yet, I find we continually want to blame some outside source for the stupid things we do. This is simply a new form of the fundamental attribution error, except it is on a much larger scale.

      What this really all leads to is two camps. There are those who believe that we can prevent crime by isolating people from the evils of the world (as seen in this article; I like to call it the "Garden of Eden syndrome"). Once the idea has been put in someone's mind, it then requires an internal filtering process to occur: is the behavior I saw others engage in in appropriate for me? But if the idea never reaches you, then you don't have to filter anything yourself....you can simply rely on someone "greater" to decide what you should see.

      I don't hold to that. I believe this comes down to freedom and choice. I should be free to see and read all kinds of ideas. With that freedom comes the responsibility to filter appropriately and determine how to act. If others wish to blame their poor behavior on those around them, the TV shows they watched or the games they played, they are free to do that. But, in the end, their behavior was the result of their choices, and it is better to stand up and take responsibility for your own actions than to push that responsiblity off on someone who doesn't even know you exist (the maker of the game, the creator of the TV show, etc.)

      That is my philsophical take on your post. From a logical perspective, you (and the article) are making the fundamental logical mistake of post hoc ergo propter hoc: just because the crime occurred after TV was made available does not mean the crime was caused by the TV's appearance. I think the post above mine treats this topic better than I can, though I thought I would point it out as an aside to my main point.

    13. Re:Eh... so what? by yali · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fortunately, there is more evidence than Bhutan. Like this nice review of hundreds of controlled experiments and long-term outcome studies.

      As a sidenote (not direct response to parent poster), I find it kind of amusing that people (a) gripe about there not being any controlled experiments, when in fact there are plenty, and then (b) ask for the ultimate uncontrolled nonexperimental test by saying "well why don't we see hundreds of GTA killers in the streets?" when they're presented with the controlled studies that they insisted, in the first place, were the only acceptible evidence.

      Oh, and just because research supports a causal relationship between consuming violent media and behaving aggressively, that does not mean that ergo we must limit access to violent media, especially with adults. After all, we don't limit most forms of speech (short of direct incitement). It's just that you need to frame your defense in terms of the First Amendment, not by ignoring available evidence.

  2. Running out of ideas? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it include a Jack Thompson kind of lawer?

  3. In other news by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    C-SPAN2 today will air an episode of Head of the Class 2005 where the students form a representative government that really is more interested in padding their pockets than in protecting their constituents.

    We have to accept that the media has nothing to report on. They HAVE to report on games that may entice teenagers to murder, and the fiction media has to make it fact.

    It isn't like Sharon quit the Likud or gold hit a 18 year high or GM is cutting 30,000 union jobs that it should have cut 20 years ago or even that Intel and Micron are colluding on flash memory. I know there's no real news out there for fiction-media to mimic.

    The lady watches a lot of Law & Order (SVU primarily) and whenever I'm on the couch watching the show, all I can think of is "criminals are stupid" and "these cops are walkin all over people's rights." Then I realize it isn't reality -- but I do believe that a majority of viewers THINK this is real life. It isn't anywhere near what happens in the situations presented.

    Wasn't it the Miami ADA who complains about how they have problems with getting guilty verdicts because juries expect DNA and other CSI-style evidence? Is this CSI pandering to the local legal authorities in pushing what may be a big issue for them?

    I, for one, welcome our new "this is reality and you better accept it" overlords. The positive thing about shows like this is that it only helps in destroying the media regimes that exist today.

    BTW, the advertisement to the right of this article is a GTA:LS for the PSP ad. Funny.

  4. damn this pisses me off! by illtron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every time I read something like this, it makes me want to carjack someone's Infernus, back up over them with it, then go on a huge hooker shooting spree.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:damn this pisses me off! by IANAAC · · Score: 5, Funny

      and then enjoy a nice cup of coffee.

    2. Re:damn this pisses me off! by illtron · · Score: 4, Funny

      only the hottest coffee will do!

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
  5. And now... by daranz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody needs to go start killing people, and say that he was inspired by gruesome scenes in CSI. Right back at them.

    --
    This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
    1. Re:And now... by theblueprint · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      "from the bricks to the booth...I predict the future like Cleo the psychic..."
  6. Discovering the secrets of the game? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 5, Funny
    As they score points for each crime committed, the CSIs must discover what consists of getting to the next level in the game in order to stop the culprits before they strike again.'"

    Couldn't the CSIs just check the walkthrough?

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  7. This isn't a problem by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Informative

    As long as they portray it as bad parenting and idiotic kids acting out bits from a video game. Or a book. Or a movie.

    It's not that video games don't inspire mentally unstable people to do stupid things. That's a given. Mentally unstable people could find inspirations for their actions from a box of rice crispies.

    It's how you portray it.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  8. That Sounds Great! by jenkin+sear · · Score: 5, Funny

    That sounds like a great episode.

    In fact, I'm going to create a video game where you are a forensic pathologist, and you have to travel around a city trying to track down a gang of teenagers who are acting out scenes inspired by the latest episode of CSI... you must figure out what the crazy wrapup / plot twist will be in order to stop them. I bet the video game would be a hell of a lot more interesting than their show- and probably about equally gory.

    --
    What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
  9. Must-watch garbage. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    As they score points for each crime committed, the CSIs must discover what consists of getting to the next level in the game in order to stop the culprits before they strike again.

    Simple...just put a big sign over a warehouse that says 'Pay-n-Spray', fill the warehouse with cops, and wait. ^_^

    Seriously, though, I will be watching this episode tonight, even though I usually avoid CSI: Miami like the plague (I would rather perform an appendectomy on myself with a rusty grapefruit spoon than sit through David Caruso gibbering and capering onscreen for an hour). After all, we have to be familiar withh the propaganda if we're going to fight it effectively, no?

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  10. The burning question must be asked.. by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will the episode be sponsored by a producer of hot coffee?

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
  11. Re:Not that surprising... by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 4, Informative
    the show exhonorates (sp?) the game

    It's actually 'exonerates'. The word is derived not from the root "honor", but rather from "onus/onera", the Latin word for "burden". So to 'exonerate' is to 'remove the burden' from someone.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  12. I can't speak for anyone else, but . . . by div_2n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After I played GTA (can't remember which one) at a friend's house for a couple of hours, I found myself thinking about ramming into other vehicles and stealing their cars. I'm really not joking. Of course, I also once pointed at a cop checking for speeders during my Quake years and yelling audibly, "Look at that camper!!!" Again, I'm really not joking.

    While I neither rammed other people's cars nor pulled out a rocket launcher to teach the cop a lesson, I certainly KNOW that games can bleed into reality and if the person is just messed up enough in the head already, I don't doubt they could live out the game.

    1. Re:I can't speak for anyone else, but . . . by Chubby_C · · Score: 5, Funny
      back in my day we didn't need video games to give us a reason to go on a crime spree...

      we just did it.

      kids these days just don't have the same innovation/imagination/motivation

      --
      - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  13. In this Episode the CSI:Miami team fail by Dr_LHA · · Score: 5, Funny

    The entire episode is spent using forensic evidence to track down the killer criminals, and the episode ends in a carjacking followed by an almighty car chase involving 20 police cars and the criminals.

    Unfortunately, just before the police are about the catch the crooks, they drive down an alley and pass through a floating police badge, costing $500, and the police promptly forget about them, causing a massive 20 car police pile up followed by period explosions for 5 minutes in which 500 police and innocent bystanders are killed.

    However, the criminals later are found standing aimlessly outside a local hospital after a misguided attempt at a stunt jump landed their car in the river, which was unfortunate as they were unable to swim.

    And life goes on in Vice Cit.... Miami.

  14. Dialogue by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Hey what's that in his hand? Can you enhance that so we can read the writing on that note?"

    "Absolutely! I'll use my 3D modeling software to virtually reconstruct the note based on the camera footage and flip it over."

    "I think it's in an envelope, though."

    "No problem, I'll just turn on the thermal imaging X-ray subroutine that comes with the camera footage. It will detect the ink and construct an image for us."

    "Okay but can you hurry up a bit, we have about 60 seconds until some plot event happens that will render the suspect uncatchable."

  15. Recursive CSI by CynicalGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should make a CSI episode about a killer who commits crimes based on stuff that he's seen from watching CSI.

  16. Well, there are some causes for concern... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The problem with CSI is that it's not just the bad guys that believe it...

    Consider a jury: 12 people too stupid(*) to get out of jury selection wonder why the scientific evidence is so bad. They compare it with what "scientists" say on CSI with all the flashy graphics that seem so convincing, and conclude that the real evidence is not compelling. Reasonable doubt surfaces and joe bad-guy walks.

    One of my father's friends is a reasonably-high-ranking policeman back in the UK, and there is a genuine concern that people's expectations of phorensic evidence is being pushed too high by programs like this.

    Here's a use for 'mythbusters' - get them to take a CSI show's flashy effects, and then compare to the real world... Some points:

    • When you're searching for fingerprints (a computationally-intensive task) you don't put every image up on the screen - you don't even store imagery, you store an encoding of the fingerprint and compare encodings (numbers). In reality it's done by humans, not computers.
    • You can't zoom-in infinitely, or even much. Why people think crappy security cameras are "better" than their personal digital zooming cameras is beyond me. You can't "clear up" an image when it's zoomed-in, you already have all the data. The best you can do is some thresholding/sharpening/convolution operations...
    • Results take days or weeks but definitely not minutes.
    • There are not unlimited manpower resources to throw at every problem.
    • Cameras cannot see around corners without the aid of a mirror.
    • The reflection off someone's eyeball is not sufficient information to read a car numberplate.
    • There is usually more than one place in a city where a given tree type grows.
    • The city databases are not (a) completely correct, and (b) anywhere near as pervasive as portrayed.
    • ... ad nauseum.


    CSI is a fantasy - an enjoyable fantasy, but a fantasy nonetheless. Just once it would be nice if their technological approach failed (the database was wrong, the drivers licence pointed them in the wrong direction, etc.) but no, they're perfect. It would be nice if fingerprints were shown to be not 100% accurate as well (it might trigger some debate!)

    Simon

    (*) I don't really think jurors are all stupid, some of them are true servants of the state, but some of them... sheesh.
    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Well, there are some causes for concern... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consider a jury: 12 people too stupid(*) to get out of jury selection wonder why the scientific evidence is so bad.

      While this is off-topic, I'm surprised you were modded up with that flame of a comment. I'm no fan of jury duty, along with everyone else, but it is that duty that gives some people a fair trial. In a time of lessening freedom I'm surprised that anyone would talk like that!

      If you're talking about the hardships that certain counties place on their jurors, then we're discussing something else entirely.

    2. Re:Well, there are some causes for concern... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a bit confused, if video games don't influence kids why should we be worried about a TV show influencing adults?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  17. Re: Reconstructing images from low-res samples by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that's because shows like this are made as much for law enforcement propaganda as they are for entertainment.

  18. As a gun owner by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and as a gamer, I'm happy to say "Welcome to the club." We're another group of generally law abiding people who get demonized for the stuff the batshit crazy minority does in our name all the time. And our paths are pretty well connected. I was told repeatedly by the media that it was guns and Doom that caused the shooters in Columbine to go on a killing spree. As Chris Rock says, "What ever happened to crazy?" If all 80,000,000 gun owners in the US were crazy (that's 1 in every three people), the streets would truly be running red with blood like I've been told they would by every anti-gun group. But they don't. How many gamers are there in the US? If the violent content of video games was truly a problem, wouldn't we have more of these violent episodes, not less? Of course, the true issue with Harris and Klebold is that Harris was a pure psychopath. He didn't want to shoot up his school for revenge. He wanted to kill them because he felt nothing but contempt for them. He wanted to be known as one of the greatest mass murderers in US History. So says the psychological profilers who examined his writings. So, it wasn't the game that caused him to be murderous, it was his disgust and contempt for people he saw as beneath him.

    --
    Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
  19. Bad season for CSI by FullCircle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only one I've seen this season is the first episode of CSI:NY.

    Within 2 minutes they pulled out a fucking tricorder and I turned it off.
    I complained about the image enhancements for years.
    I complained about pseudo-science for years.
    Star Trek tech is just too much.

    All CSI's are off my (short) list of watchable TV now.

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  20. oh, you mods... by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find it hilarious that parent post is modded 'Insightful'.

    I can just picture some mod sitting and reading over that post, stroking his beard, saying to himself... 'by jove, that guy's right, Barney DOES make me feel that way!' (*clicks Insightful*) 'Hmm, I'd better go see if my diplomatic immunity papers cover that...'

    --
    ~ Aero
    1. Re:oh, you mods... by killmenow · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must have never seen alt.barney.die.die.die

  21. Shit, that ain't the half of it. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I saw an episode of, I think, CSI, where a cop who'd been kicked off the force had fabricated evidence to get someone sent to jail who he was real sure was guilty. The guy turned out to be innocent--the real killer had gone free, and murdered again, partly because this guy had planted the evidence.

    So, you'd think we'd be watching a tale about this guy's hubris, and his fall from grace, and how he learns the importance of due process. You'd be wrong.

    The episode centered around our other leads buttering this guy up, telling him how much the force needed him, and how he couldn't let himself succumb to his guilt, because there were bad guys out there that needed catchin'.

    I shit thee not. This is the kind of story they tell, which is why I refused to watch another damned episode. I don't care how cleft the leads' chins are, or how clever the zoom effects.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca