Slashdot Mirror


Outsourcing to Rural America

andy753421 writes "Wired is running an article about 'Rural Sourcing, an IT company that outsources not to India or Mexico, but rural America.' The company targets IT workers in rural location due to lower costs of living, 'The company charges $35 to $50 per hour for IT expertise, which may cost around $100 in New York City. While this is no match for outsourcing rates in India, clients benefit from local accents and similar time zones -- not to mention the absence of stigma sometimes attached to farming jobs out to foreign countries.' The article also points out several other innovative attempts at outsourcing such as Lakota Express and Seacode, which was previously covered on slashdot."

77 of 587 comments (clear)

  1. Like I always say by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't outsource to India, outsource to Indiana.

    Specifically, Bloomington. There is a lot of talent here.

    1. Re:Like I always say by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes sorry, I forgot about you folks up there in the country of Purdue. How could I forget it when Gentoo came out of there.

    2. Re:Like I always say by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I live in North Central Wisconsin an consider myself somewhat talented. Heck, my closest neighbor is 1/4 mile away. I think you'll find there has been a lot of migration back to the interior of the US from the Coasts of tech folks. I can charge a third of what I did in New England for the same standard of living. Better communications infrastructure makes living in high crime/cost/noise/polution areas no longer necissary. I can do my job just as well from anywhere, so why not someplace I'd rather be?

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    3. Re:Like I always say by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
      Don't outsource to India, outsource to Indiana.

      Or you can go with the abovementioned Lakota Express and outsource to (American) Indians! See, technology giveth and it taketh away.

    4. Re:Like I always say by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Har- I live in Ohio- Somethings to keep in mind: Find a $200,000 home in NY city and it's a 500 sq foot studio. Out here in Ohio, 200K is a 4 bedroom house with a couple baths on an acre with a good school district...
      I thought about moving to Cali for a job, they would give me about a 70% raise, but I would end up in a smaller house and a much longer commute.... sheesh!

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    5. Re:Like I always say by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, "better communications infrastructure" is usually lacking in rural areas. DSL is almost nonexistant unless you happen to live right next to a central office, and cable is also lacking.

      The only way to get high speed net in rural areas is usually satellite, which has unbearable latency, or running a dedicated line, which is ridiculously expensive.

      I wonder how tech companies are solving this problem; telecommuting from a rural area will simply suck without a good connection.

      -Z

    6. Re:Like I always say by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 3, Informative

      At the risk of being a shill, I use WildBlue. It is cheap, the dish is small, the speeds rock, and it works. About the only thing it sucks for is off-hours fragging. My speed us 1.5 up 256 down, with 500ms latency (last time I looked). Most could live with that, I know I can.

      BTW, I looked at a getting a T-1 before I found this place. Verizon doesn't run them to homes per policy.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    7. Re:Like I always say by Woldry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another current Ohioan & native rural Pennsylvanian chiming in...

      I live in the most rural county in Ohio. Despite the large population of Amish here, we are hardly the benighted hicks that the coasters like to imagine. I have several options for DSL or cable service. The state has the best-funded libraries in the U.S., including the first ever statewide free online chat reference service. I make less now than when I lived in the city, but have a much higher standard of living due to the fact that life here is vastly more affordable.

      Some of the best universities in the country are found in Ohio. Despite the same-sex-marriage amendment that got passed recently, I have found people generally to be very accepting of my sexual orientation -- in greater proportions to the people I knew when I lived in Washington, DC or Pittsburgh. There's a 100% gay-friendly church in a nearby town (half the size of the town where I live). Unlike in the city, no one here has yet stolen my pets or keyed my car or slashed my tires. There's a thriving arts center in my community with programs that rival most things I saw when I lived in cities (Washington, DC and Pittsburgh) or on visits to the coasts. I live a mere hour's drive from a world-class symphony in Cleveland, as well as a vibrant art scene.

      What's more, where I live I can walk to work without fear of being attacked by random strangers or held up at gunpoint (as I was in a "nice" neighborhood in Pittsburgh). While we do have crime here, I love going for weeks at a time without hearing of a single armed robbery, murder, hate crime, arson, child abduction, breakin, elder abuse, carjacking, burglary, etc.

      You can sneer about the uneducated people living in rural areas, but as someone else pointed out, judging the entire state by a few ignorant people is roughly akin to judging LA entirely by the slums. I used to work with inner-city children who were far more ignorant and uneducated (and bigoted) than the most unenlightened, unwashed farmboy I ever met.

      Best of all, for the most part, people are genuinely nice to each other here, whether you're a total stranger, a brand-new neighbor, or an old friend. Yes, they poke their nose in your business, but they also help when your car breaks down on a back road in the middle of the night. That's a tradeoff I'll gladly take.

      I know that rural life is not for everyone. If you're happy in the city, by all means, stay there. More work for me! But please, stop sneering at those of us who choose to live here for very good, rational reasons. And please stop assuming that the occcasional rural village idiot is representative of rural America as a whole.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    8. Re:Like I always say by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not certain what the people on the coast think we're missing, but it's not an extremely high-pressure lifestyle. I'm guessing people on both coasts (in the big cities, anyway) need vacations in order to survive or go splat! Living a quieter lifestyle takes a lot of that out of you. We're not lacking for much. But the standard of living is much, much different.

      Your guessing wrong. There are people (I am one of them) who live for the big city lifestyle and wouldn't trade it for anything. When I lived in NYC I had 24/7 access to virtually I wanted. Almost every culture in the World is represented. I could get food just by walking half a block that I now have to drive over two hours to find. Virtually anything made by the human race can be found in a World City like New York.

      When I moved out of the city and back upstate I relocated to a moderately sized city (Binghamton). I now live in the suburbs. Aside from losing access to all that culture and activities the biggest adjustment for me was how quiet it is around here. I miss the sounds and smells of the city.

      Just pointing out that the country lifestyle is not for everybody.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  2. Re:I for one..... by servo335 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one welcome outsourcing to others in our country not over seas.

  3. Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll continue to outsource to India. They tend to speak better English than Alabamans. (And they're less likely to take the afternoon off to marry their sister).

    1. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's great to know that there are still a few groups out there that are "safe" to hate and make crude jokes about.
      Humor is about power structures. That's why making jokes about the powerful (ie. Southern white folk) is ok, making jokes about the oppressed is bad. It's why making jokes about the president is fine, but making jokes about people made homeless by a Hurricane is not.

      Comedy that picks on the powerless and reinforces and justifies the status quo is worthless. Comedy that challenges the empowered is a valid social tool. It's the difference between standing up to a bully, and picking on a weakling.

      Is that so hard to understand?
    2. Re:Pah! by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is it considered wrong to stereotype and degrade anyone except Southern Americans? You pick any race or geographic group of people and say anything wrong about them and half of Slashdot will be clamoring for your head, but not in this case.

      You're just a prejudiced as any hate group in history.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Pah! by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am a Mexican, go, say something about Mexico, it is only a FUCKING JOKE!

      Okay... what do you call a Mexican chick with no legs?

      Consuelo

    4. Re:Pah! by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think I'll continue to outsource to India. They tend to speak better English than Alabamans.

      I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country. When you look at Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, Louisiana (in the south, but a different accent near New Orleans) how come the southern drawl is the only one that is worthy of ridicule? And on the point of intelligence, consider this situation:

      If I were to ask, "Why can't the black man from Georgia read?" and you were to say, "I don't know, why?" examine your reaction the following explanations. If I reply "duh, I told you he was from Georgia" everyone thinks it's funny and laughs. If I reply "duh, I told you he was black" I am a horrible racist and should be shunned.

      Why is making fun of someone for their place of birth any different from making fun of someone for their race? Neither can be controlled by that person.

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

    5. Re:Pah! by budicepenguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country. When you look at Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, Louisiana (in the south, but a different accent near New Orleans) how come the southern drawl is the only one that is worthy of ridicule?"

      Those dialects do receive ridicule (chowdah, da bearz, gah-run-tee, etc.), the difference is that it appears to be more ridicule of particular aspects of the dialect itself as opposed to the people who speak it. As for why that is, I dunno. Maybe it's because "The South" has more of a reputation for doing more backwards things (like the aforementioned incest), for being more aggressive than other parts of the nation (Don't mess with Texas, anyone?), or maybe it's just holier-than-thou snobbery. Regardless, I think it's more a desire to make "racy" humor in a PC climate - jokes about whites are fine, but don't go near another race or suddenly you're a racist bigot, so people are forced to joke about a white "race," in this case, southerners.

    6. Re:Pah! by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      making jokes about the powerful (ie. Southern white folk)

      I don't think the targets of the original insult were Ted Turner types. I think the targets were poor white southerners, who will apparently be spat upon for generations to come.

      And the blue state people ask, "Why can't these morons vote for us? We're so much better than them!" Jesus...

    7. Re:Pah! by BemusedInBama · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a native and resident of Alabama, I had originally intended to defend my home state. I thought I might point out Alabama is an incredibly diverse place full of smart people (think about NASA, UA Med School and Business School, etc.). Later, I thought it might be more effective to draw attention to your own shortcomings in writing the English language (It is Alabamians, and as a pronoun They should reference an already defined noun). Next, I thought I could point out the irony (and I don't mean the Alanis Morissette kind) that is exhibited when you mock the English speaking ability of Alabamians using poorly written English of your own. Finally, I thought a well-placed FU would be more appropriate for an empty minded simpleton like your self.

      Instead, I decided it would be best to promote friendship, compassion, and understanding among all. So, I'll leave you with a joke about Tennesseans.


      What does a woman from Tennessee say after making love?
      Get off me Daddy, your crushing my cigarettes.

    8. Re:Pah! by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country. When you look at Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, Louisiana (in the south, but a different accent near New Orleans) how come the southern drawl is the only one that is worthy of ridicule?

      Politics. Most Southern states are so-called "red states", so calling them "backwards" is an indirect way of calling Republicans backwards. For some reason, some people prefer to do this indirectly, rather than just calling a spade a spade and saying that Republicans are backwards. Maybe they're shy.

      Also, hypocrisy. Society only considers it bad to be bigoted against recently oppressed people groups, and it turns a blind eye towards overlap between groups it's ok to be bigoted against and groups it's not ok to be bigoted against. (Some of those "backwards southerners" are women and minorities.)

    9. Re:Pah! by Woldry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Politics. Most Southern states are so-called "red states", so calling them "backwards" is an indirect way of calling Republicans backwards. For some reason, some people prefer to do this indirectly, rather than just calling a spade a spade and saying that Republicans are backwards.

      Hogwash. Southern (and other rural) stereotyping has been going on since long before the Southern states went Republican. For decades, the South voted mostly Democratic, and urban people still called them backwards.

      The other way in which your argument falls apart is that there are plenty of Republicans who call Southerners (and other rural folk) backwards, too. Are they politically motivated? If so, just exactly how is that?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    10. Re:Pah! by mrtrumbe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What a load of shit. Somebody seems to have a persecution complex...

      I'm from a backwards area (the Upper Penninsula of Michigan--which happens to have the same type of accent as Northern Minnesota and Wisconsin--you know, derivatives of the Fargo accent). I can tell you that I don't call people from my home territory backwards because they are Republicans, I call them backwards because they are behind the times on many, many issues. Despite some great high schools in the UP, there is still a devastating lack of good education (both primary and secondary) among residents, with widespread ignorance on many topics the result. There is almost NO culture to be found off the campuses of the two Universities worth mentioning (MTU, and NMU). There is little appreciation for art, theatre, music, etc. The economy is almost entirely reliant on manufacturing (mostly paper these days) and tourism, which means little in the way of infrastructure appropriate for small IP-oriented businesses. And finally, the horrible accent. Even UPers make fun of their accent (via "Say ya to da UP, eh?" bumper stickers).

      That said, there is plenty to like about the UP, and there are plenty of people to like in the UP. There are many articulate, informed and cultured citizens. The land is plentiful and beautiful. The way of life is relaxed and simple. But none of this changes the fact that in a large portion of citizens there is rampant racism and homophobia, and you have to search hard for any semblance of culture.

      Yes, I consider much of the UP to be backwards (ditto for Alabama and some grain-belt states). Am I a bigot? I don't think so. I appreciate the fact that not all people from the UP (or from the ghetto, for that matter) are the same. There is a difference between acknowledging the truths behind stereotypes and bigotry.

      Taft

    11. Re:Pah! by shanebush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... I'll bite to this one.

      What is interesting is that there is a great example of this type of industry in my hometown in South Alabama.

      A few years ago an outsourcing company, now known as Client Logic came in and setup what is described here as a "Rural Outsourcing" center. It has infused the local economy with good quality jobs. Several members of my family and friends work there.

      As for the lower wages, in that part of the world, you can make $10 an hour and live like a person making $30 an hour elsewhere. Average price of a 2500-3000 square foot house on one to two acres is under $100,000.

      There's another aspect to this. Rural folk, no matter what part of the country you're from, if treated fairly will be extremely loyal and will do whatever it takes to help out.

  4. Look to the 'burbs by josh.loomis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are places on the fringe of major cities where a lot of intelligent, IT-inclined people hang their hats. Suburban areas probably have a lot of young minds that are willing and able to adapt to the ever-changing world of IT. Much better to 'source there than a foriegn country IMHO.

    --
    I know, deep inside me, there's a Linux nut just waiting to be let out.
  5. It's not the accent anymore by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems many of the better quality India based customer service companies have been hiring employees with little or no accent, so their English is very clear.

    The thing that annoys me now is that they're so damn polite. You give them your first name and they reply "Thank you. Thank you sir. Thank you for the information." To ask a question they start with "Sir, could I please ask you for the ...". It takes almost 3 times as long to have a conversation as it should. You can be polite, but also be quick.

    1. Re:It's not the accent anymore by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what's worse? Calling Comcast or the local power company in an urban area. They answer your call and say "Yo bitch, gimme ur account digits now ... Fuck dis shitz - you be late on your payments fool ... We be slappin some late charges on yo ass." And you can barely understand them anyhow because its some girl named Ayisha that inflects her voice in weird ways, or some guy named Pablo that slurs his words all together.

  6. The Park Avenue Digitician by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On my last job, wirelessing an apartment and "dealing with" schlepping to a cheap Brooklyn store to buy the family a laptop plus a little de-spywaring, I got paid $600 cash money. Sure the work I did might be worth under $20 in sweat, but one extra-sharp demand in Manhattan is paying for trustworthiness. I've networked and have a reputation with clients for getting the job done and not stealing any silverware. Manhattan pays more not just because people can afford to, there is a greater demand to protect their assets. Got some nice silverware here. And some virgins. Err, withdrawn---got some silverware.

  7. No revolution here by polv0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The biggest benefit is knowing that we're giving jobs to American workers, versus a foreign country,"

    This isn't sufficient motivation for US firms to rural-source, and neither are local accents or convenient time zones. The reason the programmer makes $100 in NYC is that they need to be there physically, to interface with a broader team, client, management, etc... If a job can be sourced to someone in a small town in America, 99% of the time it can be sourced to someone in India, for pennies on the dollar.
    1. Re:No revolution here by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't under estimate the importance of being in the same time zone. I've worked on projects with Americans over 5 hours difference. (Europe to America) It was still a challange to have Americans that once worked in the same office trying to coordinate over the timezones. I've also worked on projects with people in India. The greater the time difference the more overhead that's required to keep people syncronized. PM's get sucked into the whole "People working 24/7" thing. However, the PM's have never put in the work requried or hired additional PM's to keep those people on the same page. I would much rather work with someone in my own timezone. Realworld experience tells me that the labor may be cheap. However, the additional managment required ends up negating most of the bennefits.

    2. Re:No revolution here by qwijibo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sometimes out-of-pocket isn't the only cost that people are concerned with. Another advantage of rural outsourcing is that you can prosecute under US laws. I suspect this would be a big selling point for those who want to lower the costs related to processing medical data without assuming the liability if someone decides to ransom the data.

    3. Re:No revolution here by CodeHog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to mention the fact that any questions that pop-up while the over night shift is working take about 24 hours to resolve JUST FROM A LOGISTICS STANDPOINT, if you're lucky and the answers are perfect and don't require any follow up answers. Yeap, been there...actually stuck in that reality right now. My advice, shift all your target dates ahead by about 1/3 of the estimated hours.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  8. The telecommute is murder by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd give anything to be outsourced to someplace I'd want to live, say New Mexico, Northern California. I like making a lot of money, but it just doesn't go that far in New Jersey, where property taxes are out of control and there are just too many people. I'd take a pay cut to live in some place that was quieter, with a lower cost-of-living. And in this day-and-age of telecommuting, why not? I suspect it would save companies a fortune just by not having to have huge amounts of office space and the environment would certainly be served by getting a large number of commuters off the road.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:The telecommute is murder by lowrydr310 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I live in New Jersey too, and it is out of control. Even in rural New Jersey (yes, just drive west on I-78 or 80 and you'll see rural NJ) everything such as food and homes are still extremely expensive.

      Magically when you cross the border into PA, everything becomes more reasonable. I'd love to live in Stroudsburg or Bethlehem, but I work just outside Manhattan. I can't handle 120 miles round trip daily. Perhaps two or three times a week would work (there are buses!), but not every day.

      I wish I could telecommute.

    2. Re:The telecommute is murder by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Funny



      I'd take a pay cut to live in some place that was quieter, with a lower cost-of-living. ... I'd give anything to be outsourced to someplace I'd want to live, say New Mexico, Northern California.

      Boy, is that funny. If by 'cheaper' and 'Northern California' you mean some shack on the side of a mountain in the middle of the Sierra Nevada where it takes you 1 day by donkey to the nearest fire road ... then you might have a point. Otherwise, stick to New Jersey.

      Or better yet, look somewhere else that is just as gorgeous ... Oregon, Washington, Colorado ... these places all have needs for high tech employees.

  9. They should look into hiring a decent web designer by newdamage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm all for taking advantage of hiring in small town America (I live in Indiana for the record), and quite frankly not having to deal with insane traffic, pollution, and outrageous housing prices is very nice.

    But I think this firm might want to first invest in a website that looks like it was designed by more than a 16 year old with a "Learn HTML in 21 days!" book.

    But that's just me, thinking people base opinions of companies off of how their website looks.

    --
    ce n'est pas un Sig.
  10. Don't forget language... by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All jokes aside from the horrible english that americans sometimes use, I (and many people I know) have had it with trying to communicate with people whose first language is not english. They may have had the crash course in english, but it's still hard to understand.

        It's my understanding that one of the benefits of buying Dell stuff from the business unit (maybe only large bus) is that the tech support speaks real english. Maybe people are learning that sometimes a lower price is not all that it's cracked up to be.

    eric

    1. Re:Don't forget language... by wal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, I don't think this Dell technician spoke English as their native tongue.

      http://www.jigglethecable.org/node/139

  11. Not far off. by RandoX · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work in Indianapolis. The parent company is in Los Angeles. Works out for both of us.

    1. Re:Not far off. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other nice thing about outsourcing to rural America is that, if you are the type that doesn't look busy because you get it done right the first time (or you just really kick gluteous maximus at multi-tasking), you can hold down two jobs on a 50 hour per week schedule. Of course, it depends on what type of outsourced job you have. Or, if you are more sane, you can do your one job in less than 40 hours a week and enjoy your nice, big house with a few acres out in wherever. Despite the stereotypes, not all of rural America is full of bigotted hicks, and things are on the whole getting better even where there are bigotted hicks. Well, except Oklahoma and Central Pennsylvania. I have no hope for either of them anytime this century. Although, if people living in big cities who are only there because they like the kind of work they are doing can move back, maybe things will improve even more.

    2. Re:Not far off. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But the article says $35 to $50 for consulting? Assuming the contracting company takes a good bite of that, it sure doesn't sound like much. I think one could make a lot more as a plumber.

    3. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frequently, people who bitch about a lack of tolerance are doing intolerable things.

    4. Re:Not far off. by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First...plumbers don't do too bad. The national average in the US is $47,000- which includes plumbers of all levels. An experienced plumber could easily be in the $80,000+ range in a large city. Second...people can't just become plumbers because it's an 'easy job.' Good plumbers have a LOT of education and experience. When a company is running pipes under a five million dollar home, or in an expensive commercial building, or safety equipment in a skyscaper, they don't just trust it to any chump. It would cost far more to come out to make a repair, than it would to have it done right the first time. And they get compensated for this. There ARE chump plumbers out there. They install sprinklers, and clear drains. Think of them as being the 'help desk' of the plumbing industry. I've shifted around between trades and offices during my working career. And the one thing that is common between the two, is that each side thinks that the other is overpaid and lazy. Tradesmen see people sitting in offices, and they think they are getting paid for doing nothing. Office workers (especially execs) look at tradesmen, and think that they are lazy, perform menial tasks, and are too dumb for anything else. Yeah...and you should hear them bitch when the air conditioning goes out. Now though, I am a deskworker...of the worst kind. I sit in a fairly dark room, programming. But when my co-workers complain about the electrician (calling him stupid..and laughing at his mullet (dude, get rid of the mullet...he's right about that)) I just wonder if any of them could do the work he is doing. And the last time we had an electrician come in, it was because one of the IT guys ordered the wrong equipment, and the server room had to be re-wired to accomodate it. You can be sure the electricians were talking shit about that.... No, we're not smarter just because we stare at screen all day...nor are we more valuable. The only part of this that makes me feel good, is that I work on an HR project. I see everyone's salaries...and the plumbers and electricians are on a very similar payscale to the IT workers. (Advertised salaries are different...but the plumbers tend to be on the higher end of their scale, because they change jobs less frequently...'Hot-Shot' IT guys move around a lot more..and are on the lower end of their particular job scale) I.T. is just the plumbing of the future.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    5. Re:Not far off. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is likely because we do not hear a lot of things happening [in flyover country], and things do happen on the coasts.

      This is because the coasts treat news of Midwest factory closings and the like as unimportant. The economy is crashing in the Rusty States, and the coasters not only couldn't care less, but probably find it encouraging, since such a thing only translates to short-term gains in their stock portfolios.

      It's all about class war, Ace. The Midwesterners are merely on the losing side, and losers never get fair treatment from the media. Overwhelmingly, Midwesterners are now waking up to empty businesses and shuttered factories ... after a generation of having woken up to new owners who were almost invariably from NY or LA.

      Despite my contempt for attitudes like yours, it still isn't rational to sympathize with the Midwesterners who are turning into America's fastest growing wage-slave class. Millions of unionized workers in the Midwest could see throughout the 1990s that their gravy train was ending. Yet instead of preparing for a future of markedly lower wages, they went as a class on a gargantuan spending spree in some sort of demented race with the much-better-paid coasters. We can certainly blame the banks for urging on this orgy of spending and speculation, but ultimately (per the doctrine of personal responsibility) it falls upon each worker for shouldering luxuries while pretending they were necessities.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    6. Re:Not far off. by Darby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about class war, Ace. The Midwesterners are merely on the losing side, and losers never get fair treatment from the media.

      It is about class war, most of us are losers in it, but you have totally failed to even recognize the facts of the matter.

      The Midwesterners, Rural people, Red Staters, whatever you want to call them are "on" the winning side, since they continually vote for the Republican party who is the party of the wealthy elite. The fact that their choices continue to fuck them *as well as everyone else* has been obvious for decades now, but they stubbornly refuse to actually think things through before they vote.

      The fact is that when Rural folk, Christian folk, and anybody who is not *extremely rich* vote Republican they are voting directly against their best interests.

      This is because the coasts treat news of Midwest factory closings and the like as unimportant. The economy is crashing in the Rusty States, and the coasters not only couldn't care less, but probably find it encouraging, since such a thing only translates to short-term gains in their stock portfolios.

      You are so wrong about the motivation.
      Maybe, it's that we're sick of paying welfare ( tax subsidies and the like )for these people who refuse to think about their vote before casting it. Further, it's largely their votes that caused the issues they're experiencing. Further, it's been obvious that this was coming if they kept up with voting against the country's best interest and their own, so hearing them whine like little bitches about what *they fucking brought down on all of us* makes me fucking sick at this point.

      Despite my contempt for attitudes like yours, it still isn't rational to sympathize with the Midwesterners who are turning into America's fastest growing wage-slave class.

      Now if none of these stupid fuckers ever votes for a Republican again, then they will have demonstrated the ability to learn. Since they still support this administration, they have nobody but their own ignorant selves to blame.

      Sorry, but if they can't even be bothered to think through their choices, and then refuse to take any personal responsibility for the results of their choices then they can fuck themselves. They've already fucked everybody else.

      The fact that they have been living under socialism for decades and only now are learning about capitalism and still refuse to be honest about the results puts the blame squarely on them.

  12. They really should by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't get why more companies don't do this. In small towns, you can pay people a lot less and still keep them really happy. When their house only costs $30000, you don't have to pay them $80000 a year to allow them to live comfortably. Also, it would allow more people to live in small towns. The only reason that many people live in cities is because of access to more jobs. I think if people had just as many opportunities to jobs while living in small towns, then they would live there.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:They really should by nomadic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only reason that many people live in cities is because of access to more jobs.

      That is certainly not the only reason that most people live in cities. Cities are generally more interesting places to live, and I'd rather take a studio in NYC over a mansion in Nebraska.

    2. Re:They really should by cens0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't think the culture of a large city has anything to do with it? I grew up in a small town in Oklahoma (30,000 people) that was the headquarters of a large corporation. They still keep the majority of their workers there because the costs are much cheaper than some place like Houston. However, I live in a big city (Seattle) now. Why? The first reason I moved was school. My wife wanted to go to graduate school, and it just so happens that more of the best schools in this country are near major population centers.

      But then, why didn't we move back to Oklahoma when she finished? It's because the city has more things to offer us. Farmers markets, theaters, museums, clubs, bars, public transportation, the ability to walk to many places, better stores and restraunts, proximity to interstates and airports, etc. In Bartlesville you had to drive to Tulsa to experience most of that, and even then Tulsa doesn't compare to a place like Seattle or Dallas.

      I think the majority of people who experience living in a city, like it. And since many of the top schools are in cities, much of the top talent wants to live there. Therefore to attract the top talent companies move to large cities.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    3. Re:They really should by Woldry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cities are generally more interesting places to live,

      Define "more interesting". Here in the country, I can hunt, fish, swim for free most of the year, go birdwatching, hiking (again for free), ice skating outdoors (again for free) when the weather permits, sledding, cross-country skiing, sailing, spelunking -- all within a five-minute drive of my house. There are movie theaters (with admittedly a slightly less diverse selection than in the city), a thriving local community theater with professional-caliber productions, trendy shops and coffeehouses (fewer of them, but no less "interesting" than your local Starbucks), used-book and used-music stores, high-quality ethnic restaurants (again, a slightly less diverse selection -- but just about anything we're missing here is only an hour's drive away), and the standard number of chain stores and fast-food joints.

      I can also get farm-fresh eggs, fresh unpasteurized cider, freshly-butchered meat that hasn't sat in a refrigeration car for days to get to the grocery store, raspberries right off the cane, and more (and fresher) fresh produce than I ever saw living in the city.

      In six years of living here, I have yet to find myself bored at all. So just what exactly about the city would be "more interesting" ... ?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
  13. skills? by asv108 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see this working if you are looking to provide basic end user support, but good luck finding highly skilled technical people to move to the country for less money. In the past, I've been involved in trying to hire skilled workers to rural areas and its very difficult to find good people who are willing to move to remote areas.

    1. Re:skills? by skiman1979 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I certainly do not want to simply meet the cost of living. If that's what I have to do, then that's what I have to do. My point was that it's not a paycut for someone that already lives in a rural area. If it costs me $35,000 a year to live comfortably in my rural home town, then I surely don't need $80,000 a year salary like some people may in the big cities. Since I already live in that rural area, it's not a pay cut for me to, say, take the same position as the person making $80,000 but work for $50,000 instead.

      If you look at the other side of the coin, from the perspective of the person who does live in that big city and makes $80,000, if that individual were to move to a rural community where it costs $35,000 a year to live, then taking a paycut to make $50-60k a year might not be so bad.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  14. I guess I'm a rural source by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I moved to Arkansas from the Washington D.C. area several years ago. My plan was to find a job as a software developer here but after looking for quite a while, I couldn't find anything that really interested me. I ended up moving to Mexico where I knew I could find some work (and also the slow paced lifestyle I was looking for). I did some work for various companies for a while and after then was contacted by some old co-workers about some contract work. The only catch was I had to move back to the U.S. The good news was I didn't have to move back to the D.C. area, where they were based.

    So, I moved back to Arkansas and for 2 years I've been contracting out to one the largest software companies in the country. My rates are very competitive because my cost of living is far lower than what it would be in the D.C. area. I'm paying less for a large 3 bedroom house with a fenced in yard than I was paying for a small 2-bedroom apartment there. I get to have the slow-paced lifestyle that I was looking for and despite making less than I was in D.C., I'm saving quite a bit more.

    Our group is also outsourcing to a company India and I'm under the impression that my rates are actually fairly competitive with theirs. I suspect there are a large number of people in this area that would work for rates that would be impossible to find in the D.C. area or other larger cities.

  15. From a Coder in Rural America by jockeys · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As one such person, (one who has been hired to work in a small town away from any large metropolitan areas.) I have to say it's pretty nice. At first I was worried that the change in lifestyle from a big metroplex (DFW) to East Bumblefuck, TX would suck, but it's turned out to be a lot nicer than I thought. More relaxed pace of life, less pollution, etc. Yeah, I took a lower salary to do it, but I've found you can live pretty cheaply out here... you can live like a king for a grand a month. (nice apartment/rent house, utilities, fast internet, the rest of my bills, and food) Plus it's kinda nice to see something besides concrete during the drive to work. Definitely not as horrible as some /.ers are making it out to be. Nearly all of my fellow coders are competent and pleasant to work with. No stupid rednecks here, just like-minded people who enjoy life away from the booming metrop. and all the headaches it brings.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by PD · · Score: 2, Funny

      A king on a grand a month? That's 12,000 a year. I'm sorry, but I'm calling BS. If you had said you live in WEST Bumblefuck, or maybe Crooked Stick, OK. But East Bumblefuck? No way.

  16. Rural outsourcing by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I note that Thomas Friedman talked about this in his book, "The World is Flat" where he discussed how, I believe, Southwest Airlines sent its booking to stay-at-home moms in Utah. They were stable, ad low turnover, the pay was good for them, and Southwest cut their costs fairly significantly.

    In addition, you are less likely to see unionization, you can sometimes farm out (heh!) work on a piece basis, reducing the benefits/workers comp/unemployment comp, etc.

    I live in a built-up area of PA. I grew up in the boonies. I have long considered the possibility of giving someone where I grew up a copy of Openoffice, a dialup account, and a computer so that I can email my dictation out there and have them send it back on a piece rate basis.

    I could probably save about 25-30% on my transcription costs.

    GF.

    1. Re:Rural outsourcing by EPAstor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it was JetBlue, and apparently they've done it from their founding - but the rest of the details are right. JetBlue refers to it as "homesourcing" - and Friedman holds it up as a perfect example of the positive domestic trends brought on by globalization.

    2. Re:Rural outsourcing by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are correct - it is JetBlue, not Southwest. The details were a little foggy. I read the book a while back.

      I think that the development (outsourcing to remote areas) is a positive consequence in that it does allow wage arbitrage within the United States, which may help to reduce the pressure on urban areas as well as empower and enrich more remote communities where employment can be a hit or miss thing. Lose one of your majors, and the community suffers tremendously.

      By broadening the possible options for labor and making them less dependent on things like geography, it will enrich and stabilize rural areas while giving a lower cost structure to businesses. Essentially, it is a "benefits of trade" type argument, only within the political boundaries of the US as opposed to a benefits of trade scenario involving different countries. It still involves multiple markets, and the differences between the markets can be exploited to create value on both sides of the equation.

  17. Agreed. Why more people don't get this by iBod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For those on low/middle incomes, the parent poster's rules certainly apply.

    People are being hoodwinked about globalization. It's a mad race for the bottom, with only a very small number of winners (i.e those that already have plenty of internationally-mobile money).

    In the future, you can be a slave for some corporation or government (what's the difference?) or be a super-wealthy player. The age of fairness and democracy is over guys.

    I feel we're hurtling back to Plutocracy the excesses of the Roman Empire, and the US is leading the way.

  18. What about Sykes or Convergous (Spelling!) by freshBlueO2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    $35-$50. I pretty much live in rural America, and Sykes only paid $7-8 on the average. $9-11 if you were a admin. This was the highest paying section, and these people were required to know how to tell a client to completly disassemble and reassemble a computer. That's between $14,500 - $16,600 annually Yet, in the state where I live, the supposed annual salary for a programmer was stated to be $50,000, when in actuallity it was more like $27,000. To make comparisons, the adjusted County income for this same area was stated: Very Low: $30,300 Low: $33,000 Moderate: ~$44,000 Median: ~$65,000 Forget Indiana. India is right here in America.

  19. Re:But what's the quality? by paranode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not sure what you know about the real world but $35/hr goes a pretty long way outside of places like New York City and the state of California. Believe it or not, we don't have to pay $400,000 to get a box house with 1200sq ft. Things really are that much cheaper. It depends on personal preference of course, but I'd rather be sitting on 2 acres of land in a 3500sq ft beautiful house and telecommute than in a small New York apartment with a window looking out at another apartment. Also it's bigoted and naive to think that because somebody chooses not to live in a 'wonderful' place like New York City (uck) that they are just dumb hicks or incapable of doing an IT job.

  20. India outsourcing might have peaked by myth24601 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was in the Dentist office yesterday and read a Business week article about how India's internal economy is booming so much now that it's getting harder to find and keep workers. This is leading to high turnover and making it tougher to outsource work there. I wish I had a URL but it was an early Nov. issue.

    This could mean that outsourcing might have peaked, at least for India.

    --
    No matter where you go, there you are.
  21. You know.... by craenor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Everyone wants the person who answers their Tech Support call to be a computer guru, but no one wants to pay extra for that privilege. The world has changed, the computer support model has changed.

    Dell is actually the only company I know that caters to this with their Gold Technical Support (an upsell added to the service contract for business customers). At a few jobs I have had to work with them, regular Dell business support and Dell Home support (India).

    Having worked with all of the choices, I would never hesitate to spend the extra money to get Dell's Gold Support. Even if I get a guy on the phone who isn't a "guru" he has access to someone who is. And, just about everytime I've called I've gotten either Dell headquarters in Round Rock, TX or somewhere in Idaho.

  22. Communication by paranode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not all jobs in IT are pounding on a keyboard producing code. Many (if not most) telecommuting jobs require a lot of communication via phone and other methods and people in India for the most part are not up to snuff. There are some (probably the better paid) that speak English decently but the accents and the vocabulary are difficult to overcome in any job that requires a lot of interpesonal communication.

  23. Re:But what's the quality? by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If cost of living is half then earning 1/3rd as much might work out. Between being in a lower tax bracket and having lower cost of living you might end up with nearly as much discretionary income. I know when I looked at moving to California from Ohio I figured I would have to make at LEAST $120K just to break even with my $50K/year here, and that was before housing prices went insane. I have a 3BR 1200 sq ft ranch on 1 acre, I paid $140K, in California if it was even available it would cost over a million! Don't assume that people are stupid just because they chose a different lifestyle than your own, we all make choices in life, it's not everyone priority to see as many zero's on their paycheck as possible.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  24. "The World is Flat" by nyc_paladin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Finished reading 'The World is Flat' by Thomas L. Friedman http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312425074/104-96 58154-8360738?v=glance&n=283155&n=507846&s=books&v =glance who actully talked about home sourcing by Jet Blue. About how instead of sourcing their customer support overseas they work with mothers who want to work and need to stay at home to take care of their kids. This just reminded me of that.

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. --Edmund Burke
  25. Re:But what's the quality? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which brings me to my next point, if these guys cost 1/3rd of the price it brings the question who actually wants to earn one third what they could in life? Practically nobody even if cost of living is cheaper.

    This simply isn't true. There are plenty of people that are willing to work for less money if the money they get will both go further and let them live somewhere they prefer.

    I DO think that a lot of these consultants will probably end up being a little older though. A kid right out of college is probably more willing and more likely to prefer to live in the big city. There are a lot of benefits to living in the "middle of it" when you are young, unattached & don't have many expenses. But a few years on when that kid gets married, has a kid (or two, three... more?) that moving someplace away from the big coastal cities will start to have a lot of appeal for them. Especially if they already owned a (small) home and can also cash out of the high-cost housing market and upgrade while also get completely out of debt moving to a lower-cost market that has a small-town atmosphere that they think is more conducive to raising children.

  26. Works for us. by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our company moved from metro Atlanta to the Athens, GA area many moons ago. The reason was that we could get the unskilled workers we need very cheaply and they were happy to get the money we were paying. Keeping skilled workers is a constant battle since many of our staff live between Athens and Atlanta and often eventually defect to a job in Atlanta that pays a bit better.

    Personally, I enjoy living in a $120000 3500 sq ft home on 1.2 acres of land so I actually live a 20 minute commute from Athens in the other (non-Atlanta) direction. I also get spend my summer weekends on beautiful Lake Hartwell instead of the massively overcrowded Lake Lanier since Hartwell is now only a 20 minute drive (24 miles to the boat ramp I use).

  27. This might be comparable to India by olddotter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My wife knows some indians who moved back to Bangalore from the US. Their house in bangalore cost the same as their house in the US, and their commute to work doubled! I don't think IT professionals in India are much cheaper than $25 all things considered. Everything I hear about Bangalore is that its like the valley during the late 90's!


    That is a move from RTP, NC USA to Bangalore, India. RTP's cost of living is probably mid-way between NYC and BFE rural town pop. 600. A 2800 sqft house will run about $300,000 to $350,000. Don't expect a new house here for less than $300K but older smaller ones might be as cheap as $150K. Apartments run $700 to $1400 a month.


    I would be willing to move to a smaller city if I could take my IT job with me.

  28. Little or no accent to who? by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typically when I get Indian customer service they speak either perfect English (Sometimes they'll ask odd questions like "How is your climate?") or with a British accent. Perfect English still sounds like an accent to someone from the United States where every state has their own accent. Everyone has an accent to Texans except people from Texas. Some states have light accents, others heavy ones, and some states (such as Missouri) have a different accent from north to south. You'll even find certain towns that have a unique accent that's different from the rest of the state.

    However, that isn't to say that perfect English or British accents aren't understandable to Americans.

  29. Re:Your opinion is suspect by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who the fuck are you to judge me as someone "afraid to do well?" I've lived in the D.C. area for almost 20 years. The D.C. area IS great, if you don't mind living in a high stress environment and dealing with traffic nightmares. I got sick of it and left. I'm much happier where I am and I have a MUCH better quality of life, for me. I'm not saying it's right for you, but who are you to tell me what's right for me. You don't even know me!

    I've been quite successful in my career. I've had dozens of magazine articles and a book published in the field. I lived for 3 years, quite happily, on the beach in Southern Mexico, something a lot of people would give their right arm to do. So don't tell me I'm "afraid to do well." I have the balls to do what I want!

  30. Coding on Horseback by Trebonius · · Score: 2

    I'm a coder (/programmer/developer) in Montana, and when I tell people from Seattle or California what I make, they think I'm joking. They can't imagine living on so little.

    And guess what: we outsource some of our code to Vietnam.

    While the cost of living is lower, many things cost the same. This means that computers effectively cost twice as much for me as those in the big city.

  31. Re:Turnover??? by toad3k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got a job out of college in a small town and I've been planning a move into a city ever since.

    There are more problems with small towns than are immediately obvious. Besides the fact that there are few stores, bars, and women, there are also few choices of where to work. I like my job, but I would be hard pressed to find a better one in the area. Anything else would be a step down or require a move. So they can get away with paying you in peanuts.

  32. No, no, no! by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you're doing the multiculturalism thing all wrong!

    What you're supposed to say is that "marrying your sister" is a cultural practise of excellent pedigree, and shouldn't be judged by narrow "western", ahem, I mean "urban" standards. Then you should suggest that Southern drawl is in fact a seperate language, start a "Southern-English dictionary", and get the bible translated into simplistic sentences (with Jesus replaced by Elvis, as being "culturally relevant"). And then, start some large lobbying groups in DC (manned entirely by damyankees except for a token Southern frontman) which advocate "rural quotas", and always seem to support the Democrats.

  33. Re:Onshore outsourcing by daem0n1x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your logic is flawed. You assume that when workers give away their rights, they earn jobs. The fact is that Europeans have been giving away their labour rights and lowering their quality of living, and the unemployement just gets worse. At the same time, corporations are getting absolute records in profits. And those are not being used to improve living or create jobs.

    If you give the corporations your hand, they will demand your arm.

    I find it funny that many people take the side of the corporations, even when themselves are being injured by them. Tell me, are you a boss?

  34. How I lost my last job by noc007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I previously worked for STI Knowledge. Alcoa outsourced their first level support to STI in Atlanta since their internal desk wasn't up to par. They got a good group of Helpdesk people and an excellent group of Sys Admins in Atlanta. They lucked out with our group and we were able to turn things around into a nice running well oiled machine. In an effort to lower costs and pass the savings on to the customer, they opened a facility in East Bumblefuck, GA...I mean Americus, GA which is a small town with a bunch of farms.

    Over the course of a year my company started moving their helpdesks down their. Pretty much just laying off the people that didn't want to move, which was no one, and hiring new staff in Americus. I was given the offer to move down at my current pay rate and bonus with the possibility of my bonus being removed at a later date (my bonus made up 1/3 of my annual income). I proposed a larger salary due to the increased living expenses if they were interested in keeping me on board.

    At the time I was living very cheaply with two other roommates in Atlanta. I'm very selective with my rommates for obvious reasons and moving to Americus would require that I rent a single bedroom apartment for more than the current living situation. Other things to consider: my car payments, insurance rates, phone costs, credit card rates, cable internet rates, and gas rates all would not go down. Not to mention the cost of regular drives to Atlanta to see family and friends and go clubbing or the movies. It made no sense for me or any of my colleagues to make the sacrifice to move down for a company that not kept their word and stabbed us in the back on more than one occasion.

    The helpdesk doesn't take much to do and they can get away with moving it to Americus. However, the Sys Admin portion required real skill and they cannot find real skill in Americus. Last I heared, one of my predicessors shut down one of the production UNIX servers then later quit, my other predicessors doesn't know what he's doing, the other admins don't know what they're doing, and they've brought some people from India to "help" with the workload.

    I'm all for on-shore outsourcing, but I feel that some companies don't know how to execute it properly. Some companies will save money. The last company I worked for is having to spend more money in labor to move it to Americus (i.e. hire four people to replace me). Out of ~32 helpdesk people, only 3 moved to Americus. Out of 8 Sys Admins, no one went and a large portion of knowledge was lost.

    -----------------------
    Yeah I'm not bitter.

  35. I live in rural America. by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 2, Informative

    Specifically I live not very far from the Twin Falls, Idaho Dell facility mentioned in TFA (I even know some folks who work there.)

    The huge problem with this is that socially, rural America sucks. It's cheap to live here, but aside from skiing/snowboarding/whitewater (thank goodness this is Idaho and not Nebraska) there's really nothing to do for youngish geek-oriented people. It's simply not fun to be here unless you are religious and/or enjoy cowboy-type stuff. ESPECIALLY if you're single.

    The social scene in a city is far better suited to IT workers. That's why they want to live there -- not just for the jobs.

  36. Re:Minimum Wage == Death of American Jobs by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Turn off the talk radio for awhile.

    The minimum wage raises the price of unskilled work that can be performed cheaper and more safely by a machine. (Or an illegal, these days) Minimum wage jobs tend to cluster around a few industries, chiefly restaurants and retail. You wouldn't see much inflation because people would choose other options with lower labor overhead. (Buying food and cooking at home or ordering merchandise online)

    The inflation and spiraling standard of living that we have experienced over the last 30 years are a societal problem -- wages are a symptom, not a cause. We're transitioning from an urbanized industrial society into a suburbanized consumer society.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  37. Re:That's easy by Anonym1ty · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's easy: people from the deep south are all inbred, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, "kinfolk"-marrying, Nascar-watching, trailer-dwelling, unemployed alcoholics who park cars on their lawn, and store appliances on their porches. Duh.

    Yeah, but I bet any a one of them can kick your ass.

    :P

  38. Move close to your office. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You moved your work to where you live, the other solution is to move where you live close to your work.

    During most of the hitory of mankind, work was always close to home.

    It was only with the advent of the car first, and long distance trains later, that we fell on this nonsensical notion that we could work in a place 100 km away as something normal.

    I was doing exactly that, commuting from suburban Britain to London. 2 to 4 hours wasted every day.

    I got fed up, and my solution has been to move walking distance from my office.

    Best think I have done in my life.

    After finishing work I have a full world of posibilities each day to spend my free time: I can go back home, relax, go out, go to the gym. Whatever. I am actually saving money in transportation and food (cooking at home is cheaper than buing ready made food or take aways).

    My place is small, but so what? There are families as well where I live. All perfectly nice people. There is a bit of gang violence going on around, but guess what, it is not as much as the media always says (what a surprise).

    In any case eventually economcis will bring people to their senses. A situation where people commute 2 hours, with all the wastage this implies, is completely unsustainable.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.