Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Plans Mass Marketing Drive

Ivan Mark writes "Christopher Beard, the VP of products at Mozilla Corporation, told ZDNet UK on Monday that there is a 'strong likelihood' that Firefox 1.5, the next major version of the open source browser, will be released on 29 November. Beard said they are planning a 'big marketing push.' 'You will have real people telling you about Firefox's features-- what's cool and great,' said Beard. 'People can create the video and upload it to the Mozilla site. The video will then be reviewed and put on our Web site, with a link from their location.'"

27 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. Might be good for film students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This might be a real good way for film student to get some real world pratice. Might even land them a job.

    1. Re:Might be good for film students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also a good opportunity for aspiring models. "Firefox is the open-source, standards-compliant web browser for everybody. With automatic pop-up blocking and enhanced privacy features, Firefox lets you take back the Internet. Plus, look at my tits."

    2. Re:Might be good for film students by dwandy · · Score: 4, Funny
      Prizes for the best videos will be awarded at the end of the campaign.

      Free copies of the browser?

      ...err, wait a sec...

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  2. Re:Yeah but will it compensate for this? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dont use firefox (I use opera), but how many times does this happen to people who use IE? I bet a lot more than firefox

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  3. mmm...tasty by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Genetically-modified viral marketing...tastes great with chicken!

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
  4. For me, marketing will not "cut it!" by bogaboga · · Score: 5, Insightful
    While I appreciate Firefox's achievements, marketing will not persuade me that much if I still have to tweak it to have sites with streaming media work properly. The popular URL http://zdnet.com.com/1606-2_2-5967129.html comes to mind. Heck, it might not be Firefox's fault but if the other browser on the other platform works, then Firefox should work in a lay man's view.

    Do not tell me I'll need a Media Player installed because I have Linux media players of all colors installed on my system.

  5. Re:Yeah but will it compensate for this? by spacefight · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've seen a crashing Firefox too recently, but most of the time, a plugin was directly involved while loading the page (Java, for example). I must say though, that a plugin shouldn'be able to crash Firefox itself, although it does. Couldn't firefox load the plugin somehow in an new thread which can die anytime it wants?

  6. Mod parent up by mekkab · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate when I try to resume firefox from sleep (i.e. it's been paged out) and it just hangs (both on Win2k, WInXP). I suspect Java is involved (or some other plugin) but its a nightmare.

    I've also had the same problem with Safari; however it just NEVER came back from paging and after 10 minutes I yanked the plug from the wall (I was that pissed off!).

    And I hate that Opera has issues displaying /.

    /unhappy with pretty much every browser

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Mod parent up by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I researched this the other day because I, too, was so fed up with Mozilla's slowness to come back up after having been minimized.

      Turns out there's a great answer:

      From http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/qa/archives/2005/10 /beta2_candidate_builds_availab.html

      [...] try setting the "config.trim_on_minimize" pref to "false"

      This is done by:

      1. Open new tab.
      2. Go to "about:config".
      3. Right-click, select New, Boolean.
      4. Type the variable name, "config.trim_on_minimize", hit Enter.
      5. Type "false", hit Enter.
      6. Exit and restart Mozilla.

      Now it won't free memory when it minimizes, which it generally takes 30-60 seconds (sometimes longer!) to restore when the user clicks on the task bar icon to bring it back up.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  7. Firefox, Please Tame Your Memory Hunger by ServaL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 1.5 release has some nice new features, but there is one constant in every release: Firefox gets an augmenting chunk of memory.
    After a couple of hours, it is getting some 100 Mb of memory.

    And counting.

    I hate it to restart with all those tabs open.

    1. Re:Firefox, Please Tame Your Memory Hunger by n0dalus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate it to restart with all those tabs open.

      Get SessionSaver.
      It will restore your open tabs on startup or after a crash. It is also great for when one of the plugins (flash, java, or maybe just Firefox itself) makes the browser slow down over time; after a lot of usage you can just close it and reopen Firefox -- with all your tabs but a fresh start on memory usage. This extension has almost entirely eliminated the need for bookmarks for me too.

    2. Re:Firefox, Please Tame Your Memory Hunger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) being worked on (GRE runtime)
      2) Firefox 1.5 supports incremental updates
      3) name it
      4) You don't have to. Mozilla keeps maintaining the suite (1.7), the Seamonkey project keeps improving the suite.
      5) Multitasking.

  8. To do what, exactly? by lpangelrob · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Okay. I'm confused.

    To an end user, what is there to tout so that they can be 'more convinced' than when the 1.0 marketing first came around? Automatic updates? A better preference menu? Works more with sites than the last time around? Less bugs?

    Don't get me wrong — these are good, useful features for those of us intimately familiar with browsers. But I'm not sure what marketing can say to Joe User that they didn't say the first time in order to get him to switch.

  9. Open Document Format by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How much work would it be to get Mozilla to display Open Document Format documents? Presumably it's already got 90% of what is required.

    It would be a big boost for the format if anyone with Firefox could read it.

    1. Re:Open Document Format by Nate+B. · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't think the parent was talking about a MIME link to open OpenOffic.org, but rather Firefox actually rendering an ODF file itself. After all, ODF is just XML with a custom DTD. What it would take for Firefox to read that would be support for the DTD and displaying spreadsheet cells as table elements, etc.

      Firefox would be an ODF reader that could also print ODF. It has little to do with OOo. While ODF and OOo have an historical relationship, implementing ODF is not dependent on OOo.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  10. Re:Marketing by Bungopolis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A good point, but do consider that increasing the user base must surely have a positive effect on development as well. Somebody who uses Firefox is more likely to think about contributing to it than somebody who doesn't -- whether that be simply via bug reporting, plug-in development, or even direct source contribution.

  11. Firemonger by asciimonster · · Score: 5, Informative
    Would showing of the Firemonger CD also qualify for this competition?

    The Firemonger project is also boasting a lot of new features when it releases its FireFox & Thunderbird bundle. Just have a look at the cool new screenshots.

  12. Go Firefox by aaronmarks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been a strong believe in Firefox since day 1 and I'm really glad to see that the browser is constantly making headway. The general rule of thumb is really that if a page isn't showing up right in Firefox, then it was either made by Microsoft or it just wasn't made right (almost the same thing). Firefox has always been rock solid for me and I love it's features. I also think that it's really important that the browser is made cross-platform; what good is the web anyways if everyone can't see it the way it was intended to be seen???

    I'm going to go put on my Firefox t-shirt now that my girlfriend got me for my birthday last year ;-)

    --
    Aaron Marks
  13. But Marketing Does Work by dwandy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well ... maybe you're the exception then, because there is plenty of evidence that marketing works. People are susceptible to the advertisements that they see, and people do respond to them.
    If marketing didn't work, and products really had to stand on their own merits the world would be a whole lot different than it is today.

    Personally I think that what the open-source community needs in general terms is more marketing. The closed-source guys get it -- they get it because they didn't win market share by writing a better product (not even better than the other closed-source guy). The closed-source companys won market share by MARKETING.
    Plain and simple.
    And now that they face a new competitor (open source) they respond in a time-tested manner: marketing.
    It should be plain and obvious by now that the steady stream of "articles" (c|net, zdnet etc) are just part of a marketing campaign; hidden under the umbrella of 'news'.

    --
    If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  14. Re:Going to have to do better than that I'm afraid by Andrewkov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I disagree .. The average user I talk to is sick of pop-ups, spywayre, browser hijacks and other nusances that come with IE. When I tell them about Firefox, they are interested and some even download it.

  15. Re:Yeah but will it compensate for this? by dkf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I must say though, that a plugin shouldn'be able to crash Firefox itself, although it does.
    Don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Plugins are inherently a potential source of trouble since they're "plugging in" extra code into the browser (which is how they support their functionality, of course) and if they've got a bug the crash can take out the browser itself. While it is possible to write plugins such that virtually all the plugin code actually runs in another process (some plugins work this way) they cannot run entirely in a separate process, and so cannot be totally isolated.

    FWIW, this isn't a Firefox issue. It's just a fundamental problem with all plugin-based architectures (Windows is particularly infested with this sort of trouble, given that it's all founded on COM, which is itself the same sort of thing as a plugin arch...)

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  16. Re:Version 1.5 by 16384 · · Score: 5, Funny
    At Mozilla Corporation, we understand how to unleash virtually. Think innovative, cutting-edge. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our turn-key re-sizing management and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Think mega-cyber-killer. Our feature set is second to none, but our real-time action-items and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We will cultivate the capability of user communities to repurpose. Do you have a game plan to become proactive? If you morph virally, you may have to implement ultra-mega-intuitively. We think we know that it is better to streamline perfectly than to engineer micro-perfectly. If you maximize virally, you may have to engage virtually.

    Mozilla Corporation has revamped the concept of web services. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. The micro-CAE factor is web-enabled. If you architect intra-vertically, you may have to transition super-super-macro-nano-extensibly. What does it really mean to seize "wirelessly"? If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The project management factor is interactive. Do you have a plan of action to become innovative? Do you have a plan of action to become blog-based? We always redefine customer-directed branding. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! The channels factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. We have come to know that it is better to brand interactively than to reintermediate magnetically. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is!

  17. The adblocker does it by Nice2Cats · · Score: 3, Informative

    The main reason I use Firefox on my Mac over the otherwise pretty good Safari is the adblocker plugin. Not having crap blink in my face on every second site, not having a little bit of text squeezed in between fat columns of ads for stuff I simply don't want, let alone need, has really changed my attitude towards the web in general. There is no way I am ever going back to a browser that doesn't support this feature. If you are thinking about testing Firefox -- get that plugin when you do.

  18. How about less features... by bradleyland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and more bug fixes. I push Firefox to a lot of my clients, but the infamous memory leak issue pops up on occasion, forcing certain users back to IE. Also, plug-in support for Firefox flat sucks. Plug-ins are the #1 complaint I get from users. The WMP plug-in blows chunks, and there's no readily available alternative that the user can get to without jumping through hoops. To them, it's easier to open IE where it "just works". How about when Firefox randomly deletes a user's bookmarks? They love that too.

    It's a great browser. It's got awesome features, and I don't think it lacks in that department, but I do think it needs some polishing if market share is to grow much beyond what it is today.

  19. Re:Yeah but will it compensate for this? by GetHimHesDifferent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's extremely rare to find a site that works better in FF than IE, it's still too common to find the reverse situation. Websites which look better in IE are made by "designers" who are either lazy (pressured?) or ignorant of web standards. They conform to the largest user base only - IE. As IE loses market share to proper browsers (FF, Opera, Safari, Konqueror...), this approach will no longer be good enough. A designer who knows about web standards will likely know that it's better to keep the poor Internet Explorerites happy with IE hacks (as they make up what, 80%?). If they don't then IE visitors will see the website as "broken", when really the website is fine, it's just IE that's broken.

  20. Worth of VC capital by NineNine · · Score: 5, Funny

    You, sir, have just written all you need to procure millions from venture capitalists. Congratulations! I recommend taking the money to buy yourself lots and lots of toys. Don't worry too much about actually putting out a product or generating any revenue. Those two paragraphs are worth MILLIONS!

  21. Maybe Session Saver would... by chester_br · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the (rare) occasions in which Firefox crashed on my Mac, Session Saver was a great helping hand (I don't use its automatic restore for every startup, just for browser crashes).

    Don't know whether it restores data such as server-session-id cookies (which would be needed to salvage this insurance app incident, for example), but having such an option available as a plugin is what made me stick to Firefox in both Windows and Mac OS X.