Slashdot Mirror


Rock Face of Kilauea Volcano Collapses

jurt1235 writes "The rockface on the Kilauea volcano in Hawaii recently collapsed over the course of about four hours. The collapse was predicted. The USGS has some great pictures of nature in action. The new rockface, which most likely will fall again, is already being build up by the vulcano." From the CNN article: "The plume, 6 feet in diameter, sent up a tower of steam as it hit the water and began forming a ramp of new land. The collapse of solidified lava shelf and sea cliff Monday was the largest since Kilauea Volcano began its current eruption in 1983."

36 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, man. by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's a lot of new Thetans.

    (ducks)

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Oh, man. by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Funniest post I've seen on Slashdot in a fair while.

      For anyone who didn't get it you might read the wiki page for Scientology. However, to spare you from going through an entire page on that "religion", here's the related excerpt:
      ...the story of Xenu, the galactic tyrant who first kidnapped certain individuals who were deemed "excess population" and loaded these individuals into space planes for transport to the site of extermination, the planet of Teegeeack (Earth). These space planes were supposedly exact copies of Douglas DC-8s except with rocket engines. He then stacked hundreds of billions of these frozen victims around Earth's volcanoes 75 million years ago before blowing them up with hydrogen bombs and brainwashing them with a "three-D, super colossal motion picture" for 36 days, telling them lies of what they are and what the universe should be like and telling them that they are 3 different things: 'Jesus, God, and The Devil. The traumatized thetans subsequently clustered around human bodies because they watched the motion picture together, making them think they are all the same thing, in effect acting as invisible spiritual parasites known as "body thetans" that can only be removed using advanced Scientology techniques. Xenu is allegedly imprisoned in a mountain by a force field powered by an eternal battery. He is said to be still alive today.

      Space planes and nuclear weapons. The basis for any worthwhile religion.

      [insert comments about WMDs and Bush searching for Xenu here :)]
      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:Oh, man. by fbg111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, to spare you from going through an entire page on that "religion", here's the related excerpt:

      Heh, better yet, download the really funny Southpark Episode on scientology from Xenu.net (free and legal, thanks to Matt Stone and Trey Parker). This is the one that asks Tom Cruise to come out of the closet ~forty times...

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Oh, man. by Shihar · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was a joke on how the "church" of scientology has sued people in the past who have posted their secret church doctrin. They made their names John and Jane Smith as a joke about trying to protect themselves from a lawsuit.

    4. Re:Oh, man. by interiot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or, for those who want a hilarious animated version of it, see this This Week In God episode. (skip to 1:20 if you need to).

    5. Re:Oh, man. by dotwaffle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How the fuck do supposedly intelligent people believe this shit???

    6. Re:Oh, man. by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The total crazy stuff isn't revealed to them until they progressed after years of study into the inner circles...
      I think you meant "the total crazy stuff revealed to them until they've paid a lot of money over the years to get into the inner circles..."
    7. Re:Oh, man. by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear mister nmb3000,
                As a representative of the Church of Scientology. I would like to infor you that we recently came upon and read one of your posts on the social website forthwith known here as 'slashdot'. We saw that you ridiculed the faith, and as you must understand this is intolerable. We have deployed a crack team of lawyers to your residence and that of the website 'slashdot'. In the case that we are unable to disabuse you of these misconceptions, we have teams of hitmen available at a moments notice around the globe. (Hey, they're cheaper than the lawyers, they keep the lawyers honest and make things lively) Personally thanking you for your time and consideration,
      Tom Cruise^H^HJohn Doe

      --
      I am Spartacus
    8. Re:Oh, man. by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All right, I'm gonna get some serious flames for this, but here goes nothing...

      I've had some exposure to Scientology from different perspectives. My first introduction was, actually, Operation Clambake and some similar WWW resources. Since then, I've met some actual Scientologists and discussed the religion and the controversies it creates. And, full disclosure, I'm seeing a woman right now who works for the Church of Scientology. For real.

      First point: My girlfriend is part of a religion that believes that millions of years ago, an alien overlord killed a bunch of aliens by detonating thermonuclear bombs in volcanos. OK, that's just crazy. BUT... my mother, a devout Catholic, believes that 2000 years ago, the Romans nailed some Jew to a tree in Jerusalem, and that his friends entombed him in a cave with a big boulder over the entrance, and that three days later he walked out again under his own power.

      Now, you can make the obvious argument that Catholicism is a screwed up and silly as any religious, but I'd like to give them a little more credit than that. Let's continue...

      Second point: Scientology sues people for copyright infringement and spreads bad PR about them if they speak ill of Scientology. But it was less than 100 years ago that Catholicism had a list of "banned books", and some even scarier intellectual practices. Less than 500 years ago, they had a thing called The Spanish Inquisition that harassed, tortured, and executed thousands of innocent people, many of whom were trying to do good for the human race in science and philosophy. Less than 1000 years ago, that same church initiated several wars called the Crusades that killed hundreds of thousands of people, wiped out whole cities and crippled empires, and has been partially responsible for centuries of tension and conflict between Arab Muslims and the Western world.

      So really: Yeah, on Slashdot, suing someone for copyright infringement is morally on par with executing babies en masse by dropping them in vats of acid. But there are a lot of really, REALLY popular and respected religions that have historically done far, far worse. As in, actual evil things, not just harassing people with lawsuits.

      Third point: When was the last time that Scientologists exerted political pressure to get a pro-life justice on the Supreme Court, or to push public schools to teach Intelligent Design theory or allow teachers to have class prayers? When was the last time a Scientologist suicide bomber strapped on an explosive belt and blew up a nightclub in Tel Aviv?

      I guess my point is that everybody who talks about how scary and awful Scientology is forgets that religion IN GENERAL can be held responsible for enormous evils. And if you add up the scorecard from the last couple of hundred years alone, Scientology is practically blameless, compared to what Catholicism, Protestantism, and Islam have perpetrated.

      Yes, the culty stuff is scary and freaky. Yes, they have a siege mentality about criticism of the religion. But you know what? I'd challenge any of you who criticize Scientology based on a harsher standard than you apply to other religious to actually meet and get to know some of them--they're not bad people, and most of them are pretty goddamned normal folks.

      All right, flame away.

    9. Re:Oh, man. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, saying "but catholicism did it too" is probably the worst justification you could choose for the actions/beliefs of a religion. Even the Heaven's Gate cult has a better track record than the catholic church.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  2. No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new rockface, which most likely will fall again, is already being build up by the vulcano.

    This should read:

    The new rock face, which most likely will fall again, is already being built up by the volcano.

    Have the Slashdot editors been replaced with ESL monkeys?

    Or perhaps, are there no open source apps with spelling and grammar checking?

    Or perhaps, do they just not care because idiots like me will probably continue coming here out of habit, regardless of how bad the writing and editing is?

  3. The Thing by evdubs · · Score: 3, Funny

    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiit's CLOBBERIN' TIME! ... oh THAT rock face... *ducks*

  4. Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot by MarkByers · · Score: 4, Funny

    I come here for the high quality spelling and grammar corrections in the comments.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  5. Summary and title is wrong, didn't see that coming by scheme · · Score: 4, Informative

    The rock face of Kilauea didn't collapse. A shelf on the coastline formed by lava flows from Kilauea collapsed. Kilauea is located fairly far inland and has no chance of collapsing without taking a decent portion of the island of Hawai'i with it.

    --
    "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  6. Re:Wikipedia/Cool Pictures by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 2, Informative

    Additionally, you can find pictures of the lava and a description of the hike to the spot that collapsed on the OutdoorDB wiki.

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
  7. Re:Arghh by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, it's Spock during the Pon Farr.

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  8. Dead tourists? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Often one or two overballed tourists get too close and die. Anything like that this time? It may take a few days before anybody would realize they are missing I suppose.

    1. Re:Dead tourists? by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Often one or two overballed tourists get too close and die. Anything like that this time?

      No, but there was this dude named "Vader" who wasn't looking well at all...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. Some other pictures are available too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For a (usually up to date) view of the nearby lava vent that is the source of all this try http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/cam/index.htm It is currently showing yesterday's image.

  10. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, as the volcano does its thing, it creates new land. Yes, it'll take some time to be useful land, but, new land it is.

    New land ... in Hawaii. That's gotta be worth something!!

    Who owns it?

    If my 2 3/8 acre lot suddenly got bigger on on side, somehow, would I own it? My neighbor?

    Would I have to pay increased taxes on my suddenly-newer lot?

    Does anyone know how this all works?

    1. Re:I wonder by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Who owns it?"

      The federal government. It's all generally a part of Volcanoes National Park.

      "If my 2 3/8 acre lot suddenly got bigger on on side, somehow, would I own it? My neighbor?"

      First off, let's assume for the moment that the process of adding new land doesn't destroy any improvmenets (i. e. lava didn't run down your house). If you're on the wrong side of Kilauea, do you want to know what your property insurance rates look like?

      But beyond that, even after everything had cooled and solidified, this new land generally isn't anything you'd want. It is black rock; it will bake your sorry ass off in the sun (just ask the triathelets in the Ironman, and the parts they run/bike through is much older and much less reflective than the new stuff). Generally speaking, on Hawai'i, there are two flavors of cooled lava: 'a'a and pahoehoe. 'A'a is essentially broken, jumbled black rocks, but very sharp broken, jumbled black rocks (new rocks means no erosion) that can be trecharous to walk on and can kill a new pair of shoes (or your knees and hands when you stumble). Pahoehoe looks like solidifed toffee, a single, solid sheet of EasyBake Oven.

      Not all of the island of Hawai'i is the lush, tropical paradise everybody writes home about. Tropical rainforests (and all that it entails) on the windward side, desert on the leeward, snow on Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa, and an outright moonscape on the wrong side of the volcanoes. Even outside of the national park there is a whole mess of land that won't be selling any time soon.

      "Would I have to pay increased taxes on my suddenly-newer lot?"

      Probably the other direction; your property value would likely plummet once Pele is done with it.

    2. Re:I wonder by Hookoa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, people don't want lava anywhere near their land. If lava goes over your property, the county laws say your land is automatically unusable. You can't live/build on it. You also can't sell it, or abandon it to the county. Oh yeah, you still have to pay taxes as long as you own it.

  11. Major disaster? Nope. by adnonsense · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Rock Face of Kilauea Volcano Collapses" almost had me lunging for CNN in the hope of spectacular footage of Hawaii sliding into the ocean beneath mile-high plumes of steam and lava, while the USA's west coast falls into panic before the approaching tsunami.

    "Biggish Lumps of Lava Miles from Kilauea Fall Into Sea" would be a more accurate description. Maybe the editors can use that for next week's dupe.

  12. A Related Site by WankersRevenge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading the article made me curious about being killed by volcanos in general. I googled this site. Pretty interesting read, but it doesn't satisfy my "how painful would it be to jump into a lava flow" curiosity

    Cooled lava flows may look stable to walk on, but the crust may be thin, which would expose the hiker to a falling into a lava tube. There may even be flowing lava under a thin crust of aa lava. Falling into an active lava tube will be instant death.

    http://www.volcanolive.com/safety.html

    1. Re:A Related Site by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are at least two accounts of people jumping into the hot springs in Yellowstone Park to rescue pet dogs. Snopes has an article about David Allan Kirwan, who jumped into a 200 degree C hot pool. ESPN has more details.

      Although since a lava stream is anywhere between 800C and 1200C which is enough to melt most metals below manganese, you would probably just end up being a large carbon statue.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:A Related Site by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      judging from the massive amounts of steam generated when lava reaches water and the fact that the human body is ~80% water i would think death and near total brain destruction would occur faster than your brain could even process the pain of "OMFG I AM IN LAVA"


      then again if it was shallow and/or barely liquid it could be an excruciating few seconds as boiling flesh creates a steam barrier slowing the burning.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  13. Hawaiian volcanoes have caused tsunamis before by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apparently a good part of Mauna Loa did collapse and the resulting tsunami was a few hundred meters high.

    Bad news is that if it happened again, it would decimate Hawaii, but the good news (if you can call it that) is that this sort of tsunami would attenuate before reaching the mainland.

    http://www.mala.bc.ca/~earles/kohala-tsunami-sep04 .htm

    1. Re:Hawaiian volcanoes have caused tsunamis before by jmp_nyc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It wouldn't necessarily decimate Hawaii. Most of the seismic activity is on the east side of Mauna Loa, meaning the most likely coast to see the debris would be the southeast coast of the Big Island, where the voclanic activity is currently centered. A tsunami from the big island would have to travel northwest to do damage to the other Hawaiian islands.
      -JMP

  14. Re:Summary and title is wrong, didn't see that com by stevesliva · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yup, the description kind of sucked, but the link was decent. Before and after photos of the collapsed lava delta from the website linked.

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  15. Was there three days before it happened... by fbg111 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting story about this. I recently moved to Hawaii, and some friends related to me a few months ago about their visit to Volcano National Park last January, when they were allowed to actually hike right up to the lava flowing into the ocean. They said they could come as close as 10 feet away before the radiant heat of the liquid rock became too much. And it's a beautiful sight at night, with red streaks of lava on the hillside in the distance, flowing about a half mile across the flat shelf (or bench, as geologists call it) from the base of the hill into the ocean. So of course I wanted to go see this too, b/c how often do you get to see real, molten lava, right out of the earth's mantle??? Anyone who thinks this isn't interesting to geeks should think again!

    So I finally got a chance to go with some friends last Friday, day after Thanksgiving. Unfortunately, the park rangers had closed the trail a mile and a half from the lava flow, saying that a bench had collapsed into the ocean several months ago, taking 14 hikers with it, who were never found. I can only imagine that they either drowned, were incinerated, or were buried alive by the landslide, or some ungodly combination of the three. There are also a lot of signs at the park with pictures of a bench breaking off into the ocean and an unfortunate stick figure hiker falling in with it, but the pics are out of scale and make the bench look like a rather small edge of land by the sea, easily steered clear of.

    Anyway, it was a disappointment b/c I really wanted to see the lave up close. My friends and I debated a bit about sneaking out across the lava fields anyway, which would have been quite easy to do since the ranger station was over a mile back down the road, and there were no rangers guarding the trail or anywhere near. We figured we would just stay a good 50 yards or more inland, away from these fragile "benches". We didn't care so much about seeing the lave go into the ocean as we did about just seeing it flowing across the ground.

    But in the end we decided to turn back and head home, and return another day. Only yesterday did I see in the news that a ~40-acre bench had broken off into the ocean. Holy moly, 40 acres! And that was only three days after we almost snuck out on this exact bench, not realizing its massive size! I also discovered that that bench that took the 14 hikers with it was actually ~12 acres, certainly not easily steered clear of. Further, like an iceberg, the lava flowing across the surface of the bench is only a fraction of the total flow, as most of it flows down the hill, hits the bench at the base of the hill, and seeps into tunnels which spread out over a wider swath than the surface flow, and through which it continues its flow to the ocean. These hollow tunnels, combined with the porous brittleness of hardened lava rock and erosion from the ocean water seaping into the bench causes large sections to crumble and break off periodically.

    It's all quite fascinating, but the moral of the story is, kids, when the park ranger at a volcano tells you not to do something but doesn't volunteer the details or say why, trust him anyway and don't do it!

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Was there three days before it happened... by laura20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use your common sense; 14 hikers tumbling into a volcanic collapse would have made the news everywhere in the US. Yet you will find zero about this on Google, despite this having supposedly happened this year. And you will find plenty of links about the handful of actual deaths.

    2. Re:Was there three days before it happened... by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually a partial collapse of the bench did happen in August 2005, taking ~11 acres (second to last paragraph).
      I'd expect a mention in that paragraph if 14 people had lost their lives in that incident. In fact I'd expect pretty widespread media coverage as well - it's not like people get killed by volcanos very often.
      As for the deaths, I'm repeating what the park ranger told me. Maybe he was telling the truth, or maybe he wanted to scare tourists and exaggerated it, but it looks like others have heard the same.
      I'd guess he was trying to scare you into not doing anything foolish. As for the other link - they say "a year ago", you said the ranger told you it happened a several months ago. It's starting to sound like an urban legend.
      Are you just getting your info from Google, or do you have some first-hand knowledge of the situation?
      I'm just getting my info from Google, but I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss it on that basis. None of the news reports I've seen on the current collapse have mentioned any such incidence (yet it would be just the sort of thing a journalist would add as background). None of the pages I've found on Hawaiian volcanos or volcano related deaths has mentioned anything either, e.g.: Those pages both mention the 1993 fatality. Of course it's possible that neither have been updated in the last few years, but I'd still expect to be able to find some evidence somewhere on the net.
  16. Re:Arghh by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now THAT is a money shot.

  17. Re:underwater land slide ? by FSWKU · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're probably thinking of something like the La Palma Wave that scientists say could be caused by the collapse of the Cumbre Vieja volcano.

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  18. Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought all sarcasm was Open Source.  You just keep improving and revising the phrase until it becomes bug-free:

    v1. Have you ever heard of a spellchekcer?
    v2. That should me "spellchecker"   ^^
    v3.             ^^    Obviously spellchecker's can't fix everything.
    v4. Neithe'r can' obssessiv'e apostrophes's ^
    v4.1. That's why I use VI
    v4.2. Emacs said this  ^^ doesn't need to be capitalized

    Wait... that's not progress.  Eh, then again, neither was X.org...

    [ducks]

  19. Apalling post by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Informative
    As a resident of the Big Island of Hawai'i - with a house only 15 miles from the active Pu'u O'o vent (and one of the houses actually sits on a cliff looking down into the HVNP (Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park) I feel somewhat compelled to respond to this horrid post.

    First, Kilauea is not errupting per-say. Kilauea volcano, and the Kilauea caldera, are located within the park itself and the caldera is NOT errupting. Lava is (and has for many years now) been moving from under kilauea caldera towards the Pu'u O'o vent, about 15 or so miles away (as the Nene fly) where the lava both comes out in surface flows as well as moves through lava tubes. While Pu'u O'o does sit on, and is part of, kilauea caldera - and while one could technically say that kilauea volcano is errupting, it is a bit misleading.

    Also... the 'rock face' of kilauea did NOT collapse. The rock face is just dandy and totally intact as it is only a mile from me - and has a very nice road all the way around it for people to enjoy.

    What REALLY happened is that lava flowing through lava tubes from the Pu'u O'o vent, which sits at about 2500 feet above sea level, is moving down a steep pali (cliff) and out onto the flats near sea level. It continues allt he way to the ocean where it comes out of the cliff side and pours into the ocean. Over time a false chunk of land builds up - often many many acres in size. This new land is called a Lava Bench and it is extremely unstable as it is both very new, has active lava in it, and is being undercut by the ocean water. Over time (anywhere from days, to months) this bench builds to the point where it can't sustain it's own weight and other environmental factors, and at that point it breaks appart in a spectacular burst of lava and explosions and disappears into the ocean.

    This has been going on for a very long time now. I personally have witnessed two lava benches collapse only yards from me (one in fact threw red hot lava up into the air, and over my head, to land behind me - needless to say we quickly retreated to a safer position).

    As per the question being asked of who owns the new land... it depends on where the lava comes out. The lava tends to have about a 6 to 8 mile wide area that it likes to flow. Sometimes it is entirely on one side, placing it in the park boundries and thus under control of the feds. Other times it swings the other side and flows outside of park boundries, and away from the feds - to spots where we can have much more fun playing with lava.

    And play we like to do... besides cooking in lava (die-hard slashdotters may require my question in the interview to Alton Brown on how cooking in lava works, and his flippant reply questioning the type of drugs I was on), dropping steel cable into lava tubes to pull out samples, and other more questionable practices that will go unmentioned here.

    However, it was NOT the rock face of kilauea caldera (volcano) that has collapsed... it is merely the cliff side and lava bench which are extremely unstable and EXPECTED to collapse. This one made the news only because it was very very big - but not unexpected, not rare, not the caldera or volcano itself, and certainly not something which is unusual.

    If you want more information about our wonderful volcano - and recipes for cooking in it, or poking things in it, or dangers of lava, or even how to walk on the hot stuff... see our portal below:

    http://www.instanthawaii.com/cgi-bin/hawaii?Volcan o

    Mahalo nui loa!