Slashdot Mirror


First Cell Phone for Dogs

revelCyllufyalP writes "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call. In addition, the PetCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their dogs wander outside a prescribed area. Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

71 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. I don't think it'll be cheap by seifried · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a feeling this will cost a pretty penny, of course that won't stop most people that are insecure enough that they would feel they need this to ensure their dog doesn't run away (crazy idea, why not look after your dog responsibly?).

    That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

    1. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

      I am a cat person as well. I got my cat for free and was suprised to see that its previous family didn't even wanted it. It made such a good pet - of course it didn't seem that active like most other cats - but I loved it anyways. One day I found it dead, and was very heartbroken. Since then, I haven't been able to find a companion that touched my heart like this one did.

    2. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

      Funnily, I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters.

    3. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by JanneM · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in.

      Except when Kitty gets run over, or sneaks onto a truck bound for Vladivostok, or urinates on the wrong car, or gets caught by animal control, or... Quite apart from the lack of consideration towards your neighbours (people can be allergic, phobic or just plain don't want kittycrap in their yards), it's not good petkeeping to let it run free either.

      If you want to have a cat in a city, keep it indoors or walk it leashed. Seriously. Just like with dogs, if they are trained to wear a leash as kittens they have no problem with it.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Cplus · · Score: 4, Funny

      People must actually care about their cats.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    5. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or people don't grasp that a dog is a slave to man, while a cat is only slave to himself and doesn't give jack shit about his so called owner unless it's feeding time or he wants to play. Cats are t3h w1n.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    6. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not everyone lives in a city. Our cat runs free, as do most other cats in the neighbourhood. Given the fact that I live in of a small town* that's perfectly okay as long as one doesn't mind the occasional slaughtered bird on the doorstep (hey, it's supposed to be a present after all). Of course I wouldn't let a cat run around in a large city, but then again I'd probably not keep a cat there in the first place.


      * In Germany, the town is considered rural; according to American standards it's probably a suburb - after all it's only 30 km (18.7 mi) from the next large city.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 4, Funny
      if i feed it and it shits on my property, it should do what i say.
      You misunderstand your relation to your cat. He does you a favour by accepting your offerings and living at your home, you ungrateful bastard !
      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    8. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cellphone part is overboard, but I'd argue that the GPS tracking feature could help dog owners be even more responsible.

      Without the cellphone part, how is it supposed to send the GPS coordinates back to you?

      I won't be buying one of these, however, unless they take out the cellphone portion and make it into a GPS transmitter and receiver.

      You must have watched too many bad movies. There's no such thing as a GPS transmitter. GPS modules are passive devices - they listen for satellite signals and work out their location by accurate timing measurments and comparisons. GPS does not send any data to the satellites, nor does it provide any mechanism for remote tracking - that's what the cellphone part is for.

    9. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by narcolepticjim · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're looking at these relationships the wrong way.

      To a dog, you're family.

      To a cat, you're staff.

    10. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Funny

      besides, when is a burglar going to think twice about a "warning: cat on premises" sign?

      Heh, I owned a cat that did have little trouble changing a burglars mind about that (think Garfield and postman like scenes). It also made a point of chasing dogs, no matter their size, which resulted in some quite funny situations (imagine a really large dog fleeing with some loud howling, being chased by a small black furry, and the owner of that dog rolling on the floor laughing)

      Despite being half wild, it was a fun animal to have around.

    11. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by kpwoodr · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Funnily, I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters.

      I'll be the first to admit it...if my wife's cat goes missing...I ain't gonna make any damn posters.

      --
      This sig has been removed pending an investigation.
    12. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Liam+Slider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More along the lines of "temple attendant." They never have gotten over the whole "worshipped like gods" treatment with the ancient Egyptians.

    13. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Liam+Slider · · Score: 2, Funny

      A cat is never late. Nor is he early. He arrives precisely when he means to.

    14. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I know most people seem to believe that geeks are smarter than Taco Bell employees because they do what they please as opposed to a Taco Bell employee who seems to follow orders almost without hesitation, but I think the true reason is quite the opposite: Geeks are not as smart as Taco Bell employees. How's that? Well, Taco Bell employees respond to humans in an almost human way. They react the way you'd expect a person (sometimes a child) would. They obey your orders as though they felt that you're part of their pack. They seem to identify with you and they understand you. To me, a geek seems like it does as it pleases because it doesn't relate or understand humans as well. I'm not saying geeks can't empathize and show some kind of appreciation with humans to some extent, but rarely at the same level as Taco Bell employees.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    15. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Informative
      What is supposed to be affordable is Woznet, the tracking network from Steve Wozniak's new company, Wheels of Zeus.

      Steve Wozniak's old company is, of course, Apple.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  2. Calling Rex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gives a whole new meaning to "calling the dog."

  3. Bah, beaten to it by years by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Funny
  4. Just in time for Christmas... by boog3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    another worthless widget to consume!

    Please, go fulfill the American Dream (TM) and buy one today!

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  5. Sure... by Nichotin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fine for those serious pet owners who would die if their pet ran away, but it will be a total mess if people just purchase these things and let their dogs run loose just because they can track them.

  6. Or as Snoop Dogg would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... an easier way of callin your b*tches!

    fo shizzle...

    1. Re:Or as Snoop Dogg would say by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Funny

      good idea, I'll put one on my wife. It can warn me when she comes within 100 yards.

  7. How chew proof is it really? by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My dog can pretty much chew through anything it wants. I am not sure I want him chewing on something with a battery inside. If I attach this cell to him, he will think it is his, and think he is allowed to chew on it.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:How chew proof is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your dog must be quite flexible

      Hey now, we are talking about animals that can lick their own private parts. Anything is possible.

      Now imagine if humans cou... er nevermind.

  8. Re:Pooping, Peeing, Farting: The Scott Lockwood Li by boog3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do they have an anti-face-biting-off attachment for rottweilers?

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  9. First cell phone for dogs by pulaski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could be wrong but $350 to $400 doesn't sound too much like a cheap gimmick.

    --
    Quid, me anxius sum?
    1. Re:First cell phone for dogs by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, no. You got it all wrong. It will only be 5 easy payments of $70. $70, that's like what, a few sandwiches? It is cheap.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  10. What the fuck? by Legion303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call."

    You know, just on the one-in-a-million chance your dog either doesn't answer the phone at all or does answer it but can't quite make out the street signs so he can tell you where he is.

    I saved a bundle my just giving my dog a quarter. Last time he got lost he found a payphone and asked me to come pick him up. It worked out well enough, but I'm also considering getting him one of those Franklin translating electronic phrasebooks, in case he gets lost in the Spanish-speaking area of town and needs to ask for directions.

    "Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

    Gosh, that's a real stumper.

    1. Re:What the fuck? by masklinn · · Score: 3, Funny
      You must be stupid or something! Dogs can't read!!!

      But they can show the translator's screen !!!

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:What the fuck? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I saved a bundle my just giving my dog a quarter.

      I saved a bundle by switching my dog to Geico.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    3. Re:What the fuck? by Zorandler · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think the company is overlooking the fact that your dog may not want to answer the phone. They may be in a movie, library or other quiet place or perhaps "occupied" with another dog. There is no mention of the vibrate feature that we humans have become so accustomed to..

      Dogs want their privacy too!

  11. For Dogs? by ignoramus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A thinly disguised means of putting a GPS leash on your kids... My guess is the pet angle just makes it look more friendly/gets more press, whereas the paranoid parent market will be the real revenue generator.

    bleurk. Must be nice to be treated like a parolee by your parents... really inculcates that sense of responsibility. Ah well, you get the kids you deserve--and then we all deal with the consequences.

    1. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And the strange thing is: there actually exists people who think stuff like this will actually help. It's bullshit.

      If you do this to a kid, one of two things will happen:

      • The kid accepts it (perhaps grudgingly) and bows down to an unreasonable invasion of privacy. You've now got a kid less prepared to stand up for its rigths. Unless you think the same kid will later grow up able to figth back when government wants to invade the same rigths with pretty much the same reasoning ("safety")
      • Or the kid will outfox you. He'll give the handy to a friend who's attending school while himself/herself going to the beach. Or he'll announce he's going to do homework with a pal, then leave the phone-device there and head somewhere else. Or he'll find and use any of the other millions of ways of tricking a device like this. You've now established yourself as an enemy of the kid, someone who must be lied to, someone who doesn't rtust the kid and which the kid should therefore in return not trust.

      I actually consider alternative 2 the best case scenario. But for the life of me I can't figure out why any parent (and I am one) should want either of these scenarios to come trough.

    2. Re:For Dogs? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're kidding us all, right? Those Anti-Drug commercials are complete bullshit, the best thing you can do for your child is to respect their rights. This, in turn, teaches them by example to respect the rights of others.

      Oh, and there is that whole "government will do it" paranoia, but the vast majority of us feel that tracking your kids everywhere is dehumanizing.

    3. Re:For Dogs? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wondering what they're doing is one thing. Spying on them is another. It's perfectly natural for parents to want to keep up on their kids' activities. However, removing what little autonomy kids have these days by constantly tracking their movements and actions is seriously detrimental to any child's development. The right way to go about this would be to cultivate a trust relationship with one's kids, so that when they say they're going to a friend's house you can take them at their word and not worry about what they might be doing instead. Kids don't always make the best decisions, but their choices are often quite rational given the limited information and experience that they possess. It is important to understand that trust implies more than just always telling the truth: kids need to know, from experience, that their parents are looking out for their best interests and not just settings limits arbitrarily. Answering the "why" questions is one part of this; letting them make mistakes occasionally is another. People learn best from their mistakes, and keeping kids out of (reasonable) trouble is an excellent way to ensure that they are unable to handle it later on.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    4. Re:For Dogs? by borawjm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I think good communication between the parent and child is very important. Perhaps a cell phone (GPS enabled?) would be a better device for a child in their teens, where they could call the parent at their discretion, taking responsibility, and knowing full well why such action is necessary.

  12. It's all a plot by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next thing you know the government will use these things to tax our dogs. Take it outside your backyard, pay a walk tax.

  13. Forget about dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This would be useful for a girlfriend, lets see:

    - "The phone will allow users to call their girlfriend in case the girlfriend gets away", very useful feature!

    - "and also includes a GPS tracking device if the girlfriend doesn't respond to the call", very nice, I definately want to check where she is going!

    - "In addition, the GirlCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their girlfriends wander outside a prescribed area.", also very useful. No more going to shopping/partying to a nearby city without my knowledge.

    1. Re:Forget about dogs... by dpiven · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but what if the girlfriend chews through the collar?

    2. Re:Forget about dogs... by marsjays · · Score: 2, Funny
      - "In addition, the GirlCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their girlfriends wander outside a prescribed area.", also very useful. No more going to shopping/partying to a nearby city without my knowledge.
      .. Going to a nearby city? More like leaving the kitchen! :)
  14. Lassie! by Umuri · · Score: 5, Funny

    *answers his cell phone*
    What boy? There's trouble at the well? Little timmy's stuck?
    GOOD BOY! I'll be there right away!

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    1. Re:Lassie! by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lassie must be a pretty stupid dog... I've trained my beagles to text me when they have a problem.

  15. $350 is not "cheap" by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gimmick, yes; cheap, no.

  16. Cheap? by vanyel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?

    Sounds like just another expensive gimmick to me...

  17. Dogs call You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In soviet Russia, dogs call you!

  18. Re:GPS by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, you have to call it so that it can read the GPS display back to you.

    Duh.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  19. Cell sounds like least useful of its features by caenorhabditas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The GPS and GeoFence features sound like they'd be much more useful to the pet owner than the cell phone capabilities. What, exactly, are pet owners going do tell their dog over the phone? "Sit?" "Stay?" And how will the dog respond to a disembodied voice that seems to be coming from behind its head?

    That's why this seems like a giant gimmick to me. If it weren't a gimmick, and were actually useful, the designers would have ditched the cell phone capability as a very expensive add on and just marketed it based on the dog-tracking capabilities. This will probably be bought by those pathetic dog owners who make ridiculous outfits for their pets to wear and visit pet psychologists when Fido barks twice more this week than he did last week.

    1. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's bought and used by hunters. They get the dog's position sent to them via SMS and can call the dog up to hear what he's up to (barking at a bear), but the main reason for the phone is the SMS capability. The alternative up to now has been a transmitter and triangulation gear, but that's slow and cumbersome. How else do you propose the owner would get the GPS info, if not from some kind of transmitter on the dog?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Bear hunters" seems like too limited a market for something like this.

      Possibly, but there are over 100 000 elk hunters in Sweden alone, most of them with one or more dogs. I know of several with this kind of product already and many more with the old style . A good hunting dog can easily cost a few thousand USD, not to mention the emotional ties to it that you get after a while, so a few hundred is a very reasonable price for something like this.

      a barking dog could likewise scare away the quarry

      Elk hunting dogs specifically are trained to bark at the elk to make it stand still and look at the dog to distract it from noticing the hunter. After a while, the hunter learns to recognize the type of bark, if the dog has found an elk or is in distress, for example.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  20. This won't work because... by nuckfuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you call a dog it comes to you because it hears your voice coming from the direction you want it to go. So how is the animal supposed to understand where you are calling it to when your voice is coming from a speaker beside its ear?

    1. Re:This won't work because... by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not because of this.
      You could still shout "stop you stupid fleabag!" and then using the GPS catch up with the dog waiting for you. Or shout "Go home" or such. Smarter dogs understand it and would obey.
      But it won't work, because all the dog will hear would be some nonrecognizable screech. GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model meant to be understandable and working for humans. Dogs have wider recognizable audio spectrum, focus on other frequencies than humans, and generally catch different features of the voice than humans. Shout "come" and the dog will come. Play the same "come" from mp3 player to speakers, and the dog won't recognize the signal. For dogs things like mp3, computer-generated music etc are just some nondescript noises. Sometimes, rarely they understand some very characteristic noises - barking, cat's meow etc. Audio CDs are for them about the sound quality of 72rpm vinyl records. GSM is just a random noise.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:This won't work because... by dido · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that'd make much sense. If I were asked to design a similar device, it'd be a stripped-down phone with no audio capability. Just a radio transceiver and all the extra GSM circuitry, including a slot for the SIM card that would provide my dog's phone number, and of course the GPS. It'd work a lot like those mobile services that seem to be popular in countries that have heavy GSM deployments. Maybe I'd text it 'locate' and it would reply with the current readout of the GPS tracker. Or I could call my dog's number, which would immediately hang up and then send me the text message in response. It would notify me by text if the current GPS readout shows that my dog's out of the GeoFence area.

      In fact, the GPS may not even be necessary, if one has access to cellsite location information, but of course this approach will never be as accurate as GPS, and the better accuracy for this application, the better the product, naturally.

      It's not really "calling" your dog, but figuring out where your dog is.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    3. Re:This won't work because... by Anakron · · Score: 2, Informative
      In fact, the GPS may not even be necessary, if one has access to cellsite location information, but of course this approach will never be as accurate as GPS
      I believe GPS units are much more accurate than cellsite information, even with all the triangulation tricks you can throw at it.
      --
      There are 11 types of people. Those who understand binary, those who don't and those who are sick of this lame joke.
    4. Re:This won't work because... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Informative
      GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model

      I believe the GSM compression is just a linear-predictive coding model. It's band-limited (low pass), but that really doesn't qualify as a psycho-acoustic model like music CODECs are. Here's a link to a summary of audio CODECs for telephony: http://www.broadcom.com/products/software/mobmm_au diocodecs.php

      Dogs have wider recognizable audio spectrum, focus on other frequencies than humans, and generally catch different features of the voice than humans . . . GSM is just a random noise.

      Are you sure about this? If you did your thesis on canine audio perception or something like that, I would gladly defer, but that just doesn't sound right.

      For instance, I've dealt with humans of varying hearing acuity. Those humans with a wider frequency range of hearing tend to find it easier to understand speech, whether in person or over the phone. Additionally, those humans with "better" hearing also tended to find it easier to deal with impairments and limitiations in the channel than those whose hearing was more limited.

      I know we're talking different species here, but human experience suggests that wider range of hearing implies improved understanding of speech.

      Can anyone offer a citation or some expert knowlege on this subject?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  21. They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humor) by Gryftir · · Score: 4, Funny
    Apparently the company doesn't have that great opinion of kids, the elderly or outdoor sports enthusiasts.

    From the article (italics are mine)

    "Sturdy and slobber-resistant, the PetCell isn't just for dogs. PetsMobility's parent company, On4 Communications, is simultaneously rolling out models for kids, the elderly and outdoor sports fanatics who enjoy snowboarding and kayaking."

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  22. I may get one by uspsguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, dis me if you want but I happen to have a $1000 dog. Unusual purebreds come high. When he gets nervous or excited, he can scale a 6-foot fence. I'll likely wait 'till the price drops a bit but it would be a valuable service to know if he leaves the area and to be able to go out and positively track him down. The "call your dog" feature seem to me to be a subset of the other necessary functions. To call and get GPS location, you need full-bore cell functionality anyway. Hey, maybe next they will add a camera and I can see where he is.

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  23. Can't wait for the law suit... by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when someone's dog is run over because their owner calls on one of these gadgets and the dog is distracted. I mean most humans would be confused if a voice started coming out of some place on their body. I can just picture one of my dogs cocking his head from side to side in confusion.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  24. In finland we have had dog-gsm-gps's for ~2 years. by hkultala · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. So we deveice being mentioned is NOT the first one.

    http://www.pointersolutions.com/eng/hunting.htm

    My dad bought one for his dog last summer.

    it's based on benefon esc gps-enabled mobile phone,
    and has been on market for couple of years now.

    the kit contains two phones, one wiith full phone functionality ( for the hunter ) and one without keyboard and display ( for the dog ).

    the hunter can see where the for is going from his map display, and can also call a call and listen if the dog is barking.

  25. Re:Netstumbler by Epsillon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Or get several and set up a wireless mesh network using all the neighborhood strays!" ... and call it Fidonet.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  26. I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by Animaether · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My pet maltese will happily "sit", "speak", (lay) "down" and "roll over" whenever my girlfriend calls and I set my phone on speakerphone ('crappy' GSM combined with uberscreech of a small speaker).

    It may be true in general, but there's exceptions as always.

    That said, she also looks oddly at the phone and will savagely attack it if I let it go on for too long ;)

    1. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 3, Informative

      No the real issue is whether the dog is responding in particular to the command or to the person. It has been well established that dogs can understand vocabulary. IE a word as an abstract meaning. Thus they do not need a person to understand that fetch *object* only means fetch it if a certain person asks it in a certain way. If you doubt this go look into it. There was a story about a border collie not to long ago that recognised dozens of objects... that is in a room full of these objects if you asked the dog to fetch a specific one it would find it and bring it back, and bring back nothing if it was not to be found.

      As for recognising a voice on the phone. Hell some people can't do that and just like you wouldn't necesarrily do something some unrecogniseable person asks you to do niether will a dog. On the otherhand a dog may be more willing if they are trained to do more. Also they may recognise (perhaps even mistakenly identify) the voice and then be willing to do anything they would normally. Also the dog may be unwilling to seperate the voice from the presence of the person. Same thing happend to people with the invention of the phone in the first place. But we deal with abstraction better than dogs.

      I always find it funny when people insist that a dog does not understand a command given by someone they don't know. They seem to be unable to understand that the dog is quite capable of deciding they are not someone they have to obey. Some will respond to any attention just like some people. And some are loyal to one person.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    2. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ch ronicle/archive/2004/06/11/MNGTL73SSM28.DTL

      Or perhaps you could take the time to actually look it up. Yes dogs respond to tone. So do people, go ask ten people to do something rudely, then ask another ten people politely. Compare your results. Just because they do does not suggest that is ALL they respond too. For instance hunters often train to hand signals, because the dog can see them from a distance where voice commands are impractical. Herders have long used a combination of hand signals and whistle sequences. This is not one data point. This is a tradition that dates back centuries.

      As for words specificlly, the example of Pico and other similar research have shown that many animals (not just dogs) can develop vocabulary in the sense of understanding that a word refferes to a specific object.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  27. Repurpose this device by klubar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This device seems more designed for tracking people than animals. If I was marketing the device, I'd sell it as a security device for children/memory impaired adults. The value of tracking is higher, and the wearer is more likely to respond to voice commands.

    It didn't say if the phone is two-way so the responder could respond--but I guess it would be useful to be able to hear the background. I wonder if there is a "stealth" mode, where the owner can hear what's going on in the background, but the wearer doesn't hear any ringing or other noises---kind of scary.

    I could also it be useful in an auto--I wonder if the GPS is good enough to find your car in a parking lot--uncovered of course. Presumably, all the auto theives/chop shops have learned to put stolen cars in covered building, but the voice listen capability might be useful--hey you could hear your car being chopped up until the very end.

  28. Ring tones? by wheatwilliams · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about selecting a ring tone for your dog?

    "Runaway" by Dell Shannon?
    "Walkin' the Dog" by Rufus Thomas?
    "Hound Dog" by Big Mama Thornton?
    "The Dogs of War" by Pink Floyd?
    A Snoop Dog medley?
    "How Much Is That Doggie In The Window", by Petula Clark?

    The possibilities are endless.

  29. Re:The Big C by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and do you have any idea which parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are passing through your body right this second? More often than not, at vastly higher radiated power levels than any cellphone is capable.

    Find yourself a spec-an and plug it in some time.

  30. it's not the first. by hamburger+lady · · Score: 3, Funny

    Brain from Inspector Gadget had one of these years ago.

    if you're trying to impress me, you've failed. harumph.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  31. Cartoon bubble by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Funny
    Rrrrriiinnnggg.

    Reh roh?

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  32. I Disagree entirely by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very useful... Sometimes when walking your dog(s) in the forest they will get a scent. At that point it is nearly impossible to stop them, especially if you have a hunting dog. Or how about those people that own "fighting dogs", where you can react very quickly if they break out of garden. Overall a good idea I find... I know I would get it for both of my dogs.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  33. rescued cat acted like dog by doorbender · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some neighbor kids brought a kitten to me one rainy day. It was shivering and covered in mud. I brought it in and gave it a warm bath. Before it was even dry it was purring loud enough for my father to hear it over the football game and through two closed doors. I gave it some cat food, and named it "gato" (after John Waynes dog "dog" in Big Jake) he slept on my shoulders I slept face down for 9 years(not straight through). He would come when I called. He "fetched". I put carpeting halfway up the walls and he would run aroud the room like the motorcycle dome of death. He could jump 6 feet straight up from a crouch. Whenever he jarred open the door of my room and ran down the stairs it took him 2 footfalls.

    "THUMP-THUMP" A sound everyone in my family dreaded. He hated every other person on the planet and would growl like a demon at them. He had all his shots. I was the only one who could hold him for any reason and would restrain him at the vet. They were all deathly afraid of him but I never let him scratch or bite anyone.

    Once I left for a week and on the fifth day he bit my sister on her calf while she was feeding him and nearly punctured the skin through jeans and cowboy boot (she had a bruise for a week).

    The next time I went away I took him with me. He got carsick but scooted to his litterbox which I had on the floor in the back and puked into it. He was the best pet I've ever had. Until...

    On that trip he went crazy. I had stayed up all night in the hotelroom working on a demo website and was getting ready to take a nap before a job interview. He tore around the room growling and I looked down and my foot was bleeding. He kept growling at me and since he had never done that before I put him in his cat carrier. after an hour he seemed to have calmed down. I let him out. he tore around the room growling again. I couldn't get him back into the carrier and ended up throwing him into the bathroom as he scratched and bit my arms and hands. I called a few vets to see if I could get one to come and tranq my cat. None of the vets that made housecalls were in and they told me to call animal control. I called animal control. They said they would send the guy right over. They sent two rookies that had never handled an animal before. They were joking and laughing until they saw my hands. then they sobered up and got out the cowhide gloves and snare. 30 minutes later we had the beast in the carrier and he had ruined their nice new quarter inch thick gloves. They took him to an animal shelter and wanted to keep him for 10 days. I said they could keep him forever because I couldn't trust him anymore. I went over to the shlter to sign papers and set up the 10 days and impending "sleep" he would be put to and when I opened the front door I could hear him growling out back and everyliving creature in the building was cowering in fear of the personafied evil that used to be my cat.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  34. Not everybody loves your kitty. by onkelonkel · · Score: 2, Funny

    A former workmate used to have an Austin Healy 3000 with a $2500 hand rubbed lacquer paint job. He kept it parked in his carport (covered but not enclosed). One day he finds a line of dusty cat footprints across the hood. All the neighbours swore it wasn't their precious kittycats that did the dammage. "Fine" says buddy and hooks an ignition coil to a metal cat dish full of cat food. The next night he hears one very loud meow and no more footprints after that. If you think that's inhumane, his next step would have been to leave out a dish of antifreeze.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  35. Nifty idea... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the first time my dog holds up the line at Starbucks because he's yapping on the phone with his little bitch of a girlfriend, I'm gonna put his ass down...