Slashdot Mirror


First Cell Phone for Dogs

revelCyllufyalP writes "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call. In addition, the PetCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their dogs wander outside a prescribed area. Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

37 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Calling Rex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gives a whole new meaning to "calling the dog."

  2. Bah, beaten to it by years by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Funny
  3. Just in time for Christmas... by boog3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    another worthless widget to consume!

    Please, go fulfill the American Dream (TM) and buy one today!

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  4. Sure... by Nichotin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fine for those serious pet owners who would die if their pet ran away, but it will be a total mess if people just purchase these things and let their dogs run loose just because they can track them.

  5. Or as Snoop Dogg would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... an easier way of callin your b*tches!

    fo shizzle...

  6. How chew proof is it really? by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My dog can pretty much chew through anything it wants. I am not sure I want him chewing on something with a battery inside. If I attach this cell to him, he will think it is his, and think he is allowed to chew on it.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  7. Re:Pooping, Peeing, Farting: The Scott Lockwood Li by boog3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do they have an anti-face-biting-off attachment for rottweilers?

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  8. First cell phone for dogs by pulaski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could be wrong but $350 to $400 doesn't sound too much like a cheap gimmick.

    --
    Quid, me anxius sum?
  9. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

    Funnily, I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters.

  10. What the fuck? by Legion303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call."

    You know, just on the one-in-a-million chance your dog either doesn't answer the phone at all or does answer it but can't quite make out the street signs so he can tell you where he is.

    I saved a bundle my just giving my dog a quarter. Last time he got lost he found a payphone and asked me to come pick him up. It worked out well enough, but I'm also considering getting him one of those Franklin translating electronic phrasebooks, in case he gets lost in the Spanish-speaking area of town and needs to ask for directions.

    "Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

    Gosh, that's a real stumper.

    1. Re:What the fuck? by masklinn · · Score: 3, Funny
      You must be stupid or something! Dogs can't read!!!

      But they can show the translator's screen !!!

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:What the fuck? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I saved a bundle my just giving my dog a quarter.

      I saved a bundle by switching my dog to Geico.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  11. For Dogs? by ignoramus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A thinly disguised means of putting a GPS leash on your kids... My guess is the pet angle just makes it look more friendly/gets more press, whereas the paranoid parent market will be the real revenue generator.

    bleurk. Must be nice to be treated like a parolee by your parents... really inculcates that sense of responsibility. Ah well, you get the kids you deserve--and then we all deal with the consequences.

    1. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And the strange thing is: there actually exists people who think stuff like this will actually help. It's bullshit.

      If you do this to a kid, one of two things will happen:

      • The kid accepts it (perhaps grudgingly) and bows down to an unreasonable invasion of privacy. You've now got a kid less prepared to stand up for its rigths. Unless you think the same kid will later grow up able to figth back when government wants to invade the same rigths with pretty much the same reasoning ("safety")
      • Or the kid will outfox you. He'll give the handy to a friend who's attending school while himself/herself going to the beach. Or he'll announce he's going to do homework with a pal, then leave the phone-device there and head somewhere else. Or he'll find and use any of the other millions of ways of tricking a device like this. You've now established yourself as an enemy of the kid, someone who must be lied to, someone who doesn't rtust the kid and which the kid should therefore in return not trust.

      I actually consider alternative 2 the best case scenario. But for the life of me I can't figure out why any parent (and I am one) should want either of these scenarios to come trough.

    2. Re:For Dogs? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're kidding us all, right? Those Anti-Drug commercials are complete bullshit, the best thing you can do for your child is to respect their rights. This, in turn, teaches them by example to respect the rights of others.

      Oh, and there is that whole "government will do it" paranoia, but the vast majority of us feel that tracking your kids everywhere is dehumanizing.

    3. Re:For Dogs? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wondering what they're doing is one thing. Spying on them is another. It's perfectly natural for parents to want to keep up on their kids' activities. However, removing what little autonomy kids have these days by constantly tracking their movements and actions is seriously detrimental to any child's development. The right way to go about this would be to cultivate a trust relationship with one's kids, so that when they say they're going to a friend's house you can take them at their word and not worry about what they might be doing instead. Kids don't always make the best decisions, but their choices are often quite rational given the limited information and experience that they possess. It is important to understand that trust implies more than just always telling the truth: kids need to know, from experience, that their parents are looking out for their best interests and not just settings limits arbitrarily. Answering the "why" questions is one part of this; letting them make mistakes occasionally is another. People learn best from their mistakes, and keeping kids out of (reasonable) trouble is an excellent way to ensure that they are unable to handle it later on.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  12. It's all a plot by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next thing you know the government will use these things to tax our dogs. Take it outside your backyard, pay a walk tax.

  13. Forget about dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This would be useful for a girlfriend, lets see:

    - "The phone will allow users to call their girlfriend in case the girlfriend gets away", very useful feature!

    - "and also includes a GPS tracking device if the girlfriend doesn't respond to the call", very nice, I definately want to check where she is going!

    - "In addition, the GirlCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their girlfriends wander outside a prescribed area.", also very useful. No more going to shopping/partying to a nearby city without my knowledge.

    1. Re:Forget about dogs... by dpiven · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but what if the girlfriend chews through the collar?

  14. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by JanneM · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in.

    Except when Kitty gets run over, or sneaks onto a truck bound for Vladivostok, or urinates on the wrong car, or gets caught by animal control, or... Quite apart from the lack of consideration towards your neighbours (people can be allergic, phobic or just plain don't want kittycrap in their yards), it's not good petkeeping to let it run free either.

    If you want to have a cat in a city, keep it indoors or walk it leashed. Seriously. Just like with dogs, if they are trained to wear a leash as kittens they have no problem with it.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  15. Lassie! by Umuri · · Score: 5, Funny

    *answers his cell phone*
    What boy? There's trouble at the well? Little timmy's stuck?
    GOOD BOY! I'll be there right away!

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    1. Re:Lassie! by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lassie must be a pretty stupid dog... I've trained my beagles to text me when they have a problem.

  16. Dogs call You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In soviet Russia, dogs call you!

  17. Re:GPS by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, you have to call it so that it can read the GPS display back to you.

    Duh.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  18. Cell sounds like least useful of its features by caenorhabditas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The GPS and GeoFence features sound like they'd be much more useful to the pet owner than the cell phone capabilities. What, exactly, are pet owners going do tell their dog over the phone? "Sit?" "Stay?" And how will the dog respond to a disembodied voice that seems to be coming from behind its head?

    That's why this seems like a giant gimmick to me. If it weren't a gimmick, and were actually useful, the designers would have ditched the cell phone capability as a very expensive add on and just marketed it based on the dog-tracking capabilities. This will probably be bought by those pathetic dog owners who make ridiculous outfits for their pets to wear and visit pet psychologists when Fido barks twice more this week than he did last week.

    1. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Bear hunters" seems like too limited a market for something like this.

      Possibly, but there are over 100 000 elk hunters in Sweden alone, most of them with one or more dogs. I know of several with this kind of product already and many more with the old style . A good hunting dog can easily cost a few thousand USD, not to mention the emotional ties to it that you get after a while, so a few hundred is a very reasonable price for something like this.

      a barking dog could likewise scare away the quarry

      Elk hunting dogs specifically are trained to bark at the elk to make it stand still and look at the dog to distract it from noticing the hunter. After a while, the hunter learns to recognize the type of bark, if the dog has found an elk or is in distress, for example.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  19. This won't work because... by nuckfuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you call a dog it comes to you because it hears your voice coming from the direction you want it to go. So how is the animal supposed to understand where you are calling it to when your voice is coming from a speaker beside its ear?

    1. Re:This won't work because... by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not because of this.
      You could still shout "stop you stupid fleabag!" and then using the GPS catch up with the dog waiting for you. Or shout "Go home" or such. Smarter dogs understand it and would obey.
      But it won't work, because all the dog will hear would be some nonrecognizable screech. GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model meant to be understandable and working for humans. Dogs have wider recognizable audio spectrum, focus on other frequencies than humans, and generally catch different features of the voice than humans. Shout "come" and the dog will come. Play the same "come" from mp3 player to speakers, and the dog won't recognize the signal. For dogs things like mp3, computer-generated music etc are just some nondescript noises. Sometimes, rarely they understand some very characteristic noises - barking, cat's meow etc. Audio CDs are for them about the sound quality of 72rpm vinyl records. GSM is just a random noise.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  20. They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humor) by Gryftir · · Score: 4, Funny
    Apparently the company doesn't have that great opinion of kids, the elderly or outdoor sports enthusiasts.

    From the article (italics are mine)

    "Sturdy and slobber-resistant, the PetCell isn't just for dogs. PetsMobility's parent company, On4 Communications, is simultaneously rolling out models for kids, the elderly and outdoor sports fanatics who enjoy snowboarding and kayaking."

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  21. I may get one by uspsguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, dis me if you want but I happen to have a $1000 dog. Unusual purebreds come high. When he gets nervous or excited, he can scale a 6-foot fence. I'll likely wait 'till the price drops a bit but it would be a valuable service to know if he leaves the area and to be able to go out and positively track him down. The "call your dog" feature seem to me to be a subset of the other necessary functions. To call and get GPS location, you need full-bore cell functionality anyway. Hey, maybe next they will add a camera and I can see where he is.

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  22. Can't wait for the law suit... by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when someone's dog is run over because their owner calls on one of these gadgets and the dog is distracted. I mean most humans would be confused if a voice started coming out of some place on their body. I can just picture one of my dogs cocking his head from side to side in confusion.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  23. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Cplus · · Score: 4, Funny

    People must actually care about their cats.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  24. Re:Netstumbler by Epsillon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Or get several and set up a wireless mesh network using all the neighborhood strays!" ... and call it Fidonet.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  25. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 4, Funny
    if i feed it and it shits on my property, it should do what i say.
    You misunderstand your relation to your cat. He does you a favour by accepting your offerings and living at your home, you ungrateful bastard !
    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  26. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 3, Informative

    No the real issue is whether the dog is responding in particular to the command or to the person. It has been well established that dogs can understand vocabulary. IE a word as an abstract meaning. Thus they do not need a person to understand that fetch *object* only means fetch it if a certain person asks it in a certain way. If you doubt this go look into it. There was a story about a border collie not to long ago that recognised dozens of objects... that is in a room full of these objects if you asked the dog to fetch a specific one it would find it and bring it back, and bring back nothing if it was not to be found.

    As for recognising a voice on the phone. Hell some people can't do that and just like you wouldn't necesarrily do something some unrecogniseable person asks you to do niether will a dog. On the otherhand a dog may be more willing if they are trained to do more. Also they may recognise (perhaps even mistakenly identify) the voice and then be willing to do anything they would normally. Also the dog may be unwilling to seperate the voice from the presence of the person. Same thing happend to people with the invention of the phone in the first place. But we deal with abstraction better than dogs.

    I always find it funny when people insist that a dog does not understand a command given by someone they don't know. They seem to be unable to understand that the dog is quite capable of deciding they are not someone they have to obey. Some will respond to any attention just like some people. And some are loyal to one person.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  27. it's not the first. by hamburger+lady · · Score: 3, Funny

    Brain from Inspector Gadget had one of these years ago.

    if you're trying to impress me, you've failed. harumph.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  28. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by narcolepticjim · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're looking at these relationships the wrong way.

    To a dog, you're family.

    To a cat, you're staff.