Slashdot Mirror


Unpatched Firefox 1.5 Exploit Made Public

ThatGuyGreg writes "C|Net is reporting that an unpatched exploit in Firefox 1.5 has been made public, making it very easy for ne'er-do-well-sites to cause your browser to crash on startup with a single visit. Until a patch is released, it is recommended that you disable your history.dat file."

11 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still using Internet Explorer!

    1. Re:Good Thing by sloths · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did it come with a free dinosaur?

      --
      really 867993
      Karma schkarma
  2. Obligatory Jamaican Response by dotslashdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dat file will be history, man.

    1. Re:Obligatory Jamaican Response by uberjoe · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean: "Dat file will be history Mon.

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  3. Stopping the stupidity by tjwhaynes · · Score: 5, Informative
    For anyone out there who wants a safer experience out on the web, you owe it to yourself to install the NoScript extension and only allow whitelisted sites to run Javascript. The exploit published this morning (more a DoS and only seems to affect some but not all installations of firefox 1.5 according to SANS) uses a Javascript loop to build up an enormous topic that ends up being written into your history.dat file causing buffer overflow issues. Without Javascript, this sort of exploit is much tougher.

    Cheers,
    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    1. Re:Stopping the stupidity by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Funny

      The guy who drew the logo for that forgot the wingalings and the beefy arm.

  4. DOS by kihjin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 'exploit' seems only capable of a Denial of Service. There's no proof to indicate that malicious code could be executed.

    Plus, read this (from the article):

    "We have gotten no independent verification that it crashes (Firefox), but there have been a lot of attempts to try," Schroepfer said.

    So, this is all very hypothetical then?

    --
    This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
  5. Um... Did you RTFA? It's not an exploit by Schrade · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quote from the bottom of the article:

    Correction: This story incorrectly stated the affiliation of Mike Schroepfer, Mozilla's results in verifying the Firefox 1.5 flaw, and the nature of the problem. Schroepfer is vice president of engineering with Mozilla Corp., and Mozilla has not been able to verify its browser can crash and lead to a denial-of-service condition. The problem itself was a not security vulnerability but actually a flaw in the browser.

    Read the article before you consider posting it with a sensational title!

  6. IE's execution of arbitrary code by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before someone starts saying Firefox is vulnerable to exploits just as IE, this exploits crashes the browser and only that, now compare this to IE's execution of arbitrary code.

    No software is perfect, but still, Firefox is clearly ahead.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
  7. Re:FC4, 1.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Mozilla people are also reporting that the exploit doesn't seem to work on any version of 1.5:

    Mozilla Foundation, which released Firefox, said it was not able to confirm the browser would crash or be at risk of a DOS attack, after visiting certain Web sites.

    "We have gotten no independent verification that it crashes (Firefox), but there have been a lot of attempts to try," Schroepfer said.

    Apparently they're having a hard time duplicating this particular bug. Has anyone here on /. seen it actually happen?

  8. Posting from an "Exploited" FF 1.5 by tyler_larson · · Score: 5, Informative

    False alarm. No security-related concerns, just overenthusiastic reporting.

    If you run the script below, it will create a page with a title that's quite huge. Close your browser and open it again. The browser will spin for about 2 minutes what it tries to make sense the contents of your history file. Once it's finished, you'll be back up and running, with no degradation in performance or visible side-effects. You'll be able to even view your browsing history (including the offending page). In fact, I'm posting this response after following the process described above (on WinXP), and I have a history entry entitled "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA..."

    A bit of an annoyance, but hardly a security issue.

    Here's the official exploit code:

    function ex() {
    var buffer = "";
    for (var i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
    buffer += "A";
    }
    var buffer2 = buffer;
    for (i = 0; i < 500; i++) {
    buffer2 += buffer;
    }
    document.title = buffer2;
    }
    --
    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
    RFC 1925