Slashdot Mirror


E-Paper On Cereal Boxes

coastin writes "Wired Mag has an article about electronics maker Siemens, readying a paper-thin electronic-display technology. They say it is so cheap it could replace conventional labels on disposable packaging. Imagine items on grocer's shelves that flash commercials at you as you walk by. From the article: 'When kids see flashing pictures on cereal boxes we don't expect them to just ask for the product, but to say, "I want it", said Axel Gerlt, an engineer at Siemens tasked with helping packaging companies implement the technology.'"

37 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. Can you think of a better way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to alienate parents?

  2. Epilepsy? by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Flashing stuff on boxes all over the supermarket? That's got to be a nightmare for those suffering from epilepsy.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Epilepsy? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's got to be a nightmare for those suffering from epilepsy.

      You misspelled "everyone."

      Seriously. Pop-up ads on cereal boxes? I can't fucking wait.

      The epileptics have it easy; once they go into a seizure they will be able to stop paying attention to the damn ads.

  3. How utterly depressing by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > From the article: 'When kids see flashing pictures on cereal boxes we don't
    > expect them to just ask for the product, but to say, "I want it", said Axel
    > Gerlt, an engineer at Siemens tasked with helping packaging companies implement
    > the technology.'

    Western culture appears to have lost its vision.

    New technology being thought of in terms of how much you can make a child coerce its parent into buying cereal?

    We're amusing ourselves to death.

    1. Re:How utterly depressing by MillenneumMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. But so much of advertising is already directed to children. Grocery shopping with the kids can be excruciating. At least they get a workout constantly returning items I reject back to the shelves

    2. Re:How utterly depressing by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its illegal in my jurisdiction to have advertising (magazines, etc.) directed to children under 13.

      This is over and above any broadcast requirements.

      This could be a good thing if it gets parents more used to saying "Mo!" to their kids. After all, a pissed-off parent is already hostile to your product.

      And I REALLY don't want to see the ads for Preparation H!

    3. Re:How utterly depressing by Skreems · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. This only works on the sick individuals that buy their kids things in an effort to make them happy (or shut them up). Granted, I don't have kids myself, but I like to think that my reaction would be to not take them down that aisle anymore, or else try to teach them that you don't need shiny things to be happy, rather than cave in to this twisted capitalistic crap.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    4. Re:How utterly depressing by LithiumX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Vision?

      Haven't a great many of the popular advances in the 19th and 20th century been driven by marketing, and the desire to draw attention for purposes of profit? The earliest visions of the phograph's uses were more oriented towards automated marketing than towards the memoranda and music they were actually used for. Color printing was exclusively for the purpose of making product packaging more appealing, and television only became possible as a mass-market item when it was married to marketing (to this day, commercials are the life blood of the networks).

      Early radio broadcasts were practically commerials with a thin veil of entertainment laid over them. It took a little while for radio commercials to seperate from the actual content (when they started announcing the products during frequent breaks, rather than the programs constantly hawking a product within a poorly contrived story).

      Holograms were invented simply to see it done, but the bulk of the funding came from companies who sought to apply them as the new wonder-label (which turned out to remain prohibitively expensive for some time, and just never that appealing).

      Western technology has been driven by three primary needs:
      * direct threats - be it war, disease, famine, etc. Death avoidance.
      * misguided ambition - attempting to create something unrealistic, and ending up with something unexpected (and often unnoticed for some time)
      * commerce - the inherent desire to make people give you money

      Altruism is a noble thing, but it's greed that makes the world actually turn.

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    5. Re:How utterly depressing by SquadBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All three of mine soon learned that whining was the best way *not* to get something. This remains one of the things their mother and I agree on.

      Yes it takes *seriious* time and effort to do this but it is well worth it.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    6. Re:How utterly depressing by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What nazi regime do you live under? I mean the entire Disney store would be out under a idiot law like that.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    7. Re:How utterly depressing by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the other hand. You, also, are full of shit.

      There's nothing I hate more than sanctimonious prick parents saying things like "well, you have no children so shut your mouth and keep your opinions to yourself!" or even more drug addicts who say shit like "You've never been addicted to meth, so you don't know - shut your mouth!".

      Look, I've never raised a kid (I've taken care of a number including my own siblings for great lengths of time over months or years, though) and it doesn't take a fucking rocket scientist to know certain truths . . . You know, like it's not hard to have a spine and raise your children without caving into their every want. Or... you know... you shouldn't beat your children or feed them ice cream every morning for breakfast.

      In fact, parents (like drug users) are often some of the stupidest people on earth. I don't mean this as a flame or troll - but honestly, squirting out a kid is something that doesn't require any intelligence or qualification or wisdom. In fact, a lot of people might suggest that it's the least intelligent and prepared and qualified people that squirt out kids the most frequently.

      Seriously - your comment is shit.

    8. Re:How utterly depressing by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, yes he did compare you to a drug addict, in that you refuse to consider advice on its merits. The fact that you acted like a sanctimonious prick in your response validates that part of his post, although that might not have been the best way to get his point across, especially given the prickish nature of his first post. The fact is that many parents don't know anything about anything, much less parenting. Note, I didn't say this includes you and I didn't say it includes most parents. That being said, like the grandparent poster, I don't have kids, so I have no experience raising them. What I do have is parents and a sister who is raising my nephew. If I am giving advice on raising children, rest assured I have gotten it from them. That being said, my parents taught me and both of my sisters that being obnoxious was a real fast way to not only not get what we wanted, but to get what we had taken away. That might sound strict, and it was, for a little while. Then we learned that calmly asking for the things we really wanted and not every flashy piece of crap in the store would get us what we wanted. Parents happy, kids happy. I know, I haven't raised children, so what I just said isn't true and obviously makes no sense. Here's some friendly advice that has nothing to do with raising children: Consider the advice being given as well as the person giving it. Just because someone has kids doesn't mean they know anything about raising them, ask your local 15 year old mother.

    9. Re:How utterly depressing by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > It only took two times of dropping to one knee in the middle of the grocery
      > aisle, upending my son onto the other knee and a couple of quick whacks on his
      > bottom to curtail whiny outbursts over whatever pretty shiny box with on it that
      > he wanted. Not even hard whacks, it was the embarrassment and shame of having
      > that done in front of strangers that did it.

      I would ask you to consider the other consequences of your actions.

      I agree what's been done is completely effective at stopping him from using disruptive behaviour in an attempt to coerce his parent into buying something.

      However, being physically disciplined, *excruciatingly so in public*, also tells the child that his self-respect means very little or nothing to his parent (this is the natural consequence of humiliation). Parents are THE most important factors in a child's life. Children naturally perceive what their parents do as always correct and adjust their logic accordingly. If he is "told", by his parents actions ("it's okay to beat you in public if you want something you can't have"), that he is worth very little, that *is* what he will believe; and when he grows up, he will have no self-confidence and no self-respect.

      One other issue is that of proportionality. The death sentance is not handed out for speeding offenses. If it were, the world would be a horrific place. Imagine being a child where such a terrible experience is given to you for what is, when all is said and done, a fairly trivial behaviour; and this in turn leads to another issue, whereby adults have to accept children are *children*, they lack the experience to be responsible in the way adults are. It is often the case that children behaviour obnoxiously - but the fact is, they're children and don't know any better. Adults, despite being irritated, annoyed and frustrated, are *adults*, and must therefore behave reasonably, no matter how they feel.

      I was about 10 when my mother divorced and remarried badly. I had an appalling step-father while I was a teenager. I'm now almost 33; for the last six years I've been doing therapy to recover from the constant humiliation he inflicted.

      I was lucky, because I had a normal life till my mother divorced, so deep down, in my core, I'd already come to think I was okay, and so I rejected and hated my step-father.

      If humiliation begins from age zero, you've had it. Your very inner core believes you're not worth it. You don't *know* any different and you think and feel this is normal and you behave in the same way to your children.

  4. Soon by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let me know when it's legal to grab people on the street and inject them with chemicals to suggest irresistable urges to buying my company's project.

    (you know it's coming...)

  5. Harry Potter by Deinhard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are we getting close to the moving photographs in the Harry Potter movies?

    Seeing Nick Nolte's mug shot scowling out at me from a post office wall would be most disconcerting.

    Then again, a moving poster of [insert favorite model here] would be most intriguing.

    --
    Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
  6. It's much worse than that... by hackwrench · · Score: 5, Insightful

    New technology being though in terms of not how to inform consumers but how to bypass the most informed and target the least informed, depending on them to persuade the better informed. Note: the child frequently doesn't actually want the cereal itself in this particular situation, but just the pretty box.

    I can't tell you how many boxes of Frosted Flakes I ate for the primary goal of getting the Disney Afternoon figurine inside. There were also numerous times I thought I wanted something, but didn't actually know what it was.

  7. First things first by mean+pun · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Before we get all the useless and annoying applications of e-paper, could we please get something useful first: a comfortable e-book reader?

    Pretty please?

    Oh, and make it uncrippled. Yes, I'm looking at you, Sony.

  8. Curse or Blessing? by BeBoxer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Part of me thinks e-paper is going to be really cool and will allow us to make some neat gadgets. But at the same time, I'm terrified of what the marketing folks are going to do with it. We are already at a point where advertising pervades our environment everywhere we go. When it all starts flashing and jumping and pointing and demanding our attention at all times I think I'm going to go totally insane. I really think I might just snap and actually go crazy. And I suspect I'm not alone.

  9. This is a disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cool - Lets replace biodegradable*, recyclable paper boxes with a mix of paper plastic and metals that can't be recycled and will leech nasty stuff (think batteries) into the environment.

    *OK, the inks involved can be fairly nasty, but there are less nasty options used by some.

  10. Pathetic parents? by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When kids see flashing pictures on cereal boxes we don't expect them to just ask for the product, but to say, "I want it"

    And I expect good parents to whack them upside the head until they say please.

    And then whack them upside the head until they politely shut up after the parent says "No".

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  11. If Google has taught us anything... by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's that in a world where all the advertisements are flashly, the plain one stands out.

  12. Adult? by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can see there being huge money in this for the first adult publication company to make moving porn magazines, or moving porn images on paper. The hype alone would eat up the initial cost in sales, and they could build up a huge brand on being the only one to offer it.

    The adult industry was the original driving force behind the internet progressing, so who knows what will happen next. If theres money in it, you can guarantee that the big adult companies will come knocking on the door after a while.

  13. ugh by slashdotnickname · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine items on grocer's shelves that flash commercials at you as you walk by

    And imagine me walking to the nearest competitor that will not annoy me with real life pop-up adds.

  14. Re:Yeah, right by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, with something like a cereal box I doubt they would need to cover the entire thing, so you could have the same old box of Frosted Flakes but with an animated Tony the Tiger hawking his wares.

    By leaving most of the original printing intact the application of power becomes optional and could be done through an inductive system set on the store shelf. It probably wouldn't cost the store too much to begin with and would pay for itself after a short period. Not to mention, once the box is off the shelf, an animated label would have already served it's purpose.

    So much for the value added possibility of seeing something *new* on the box when it gets ready during breakfast.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  15. Phillip K Dick got it right by nycroft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems that Phillip K. Dick's vision of a future where no one can escape annoying advertising is coming true. If we're not careful, Orwell's prediction of government controlled speech will come true. Oh wait...it already has.

    --
    Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time is enemy action.
  16. Re:Yeah, right by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I doubt they could even sort out the power supply for these things that cheaply.

    And TV is more expensive than newprint. Guess which one is in deep sales trouble.

  17. Re:Just what the environment needs by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree.

    As a side comment, recycling paper is dumb. Planting (and eventually harvesting) trees is a net win for the environment. Chemically treating used paper is a net loss for the environment.

    -Peter

  18. I dont think so... by mustafap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    E-Paper or not, these displays will need power. From batteries. What an environmental nightmare.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  19. Underrated by guaigean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This post is underrated. The quote When kids see flashing pictures on cereal boxes we don't expect them to just ask for the product, but to say, "I want it" is absolutely disgusting. They are breeding mindless consumerism, and making the life of any parent that has to take their children shopping with them hell. It's bad enough when kids try and grab boxes as you push by, but having the boxes TELLING the children to pick them up is even worse.

    --
    Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    1. Re:Underrated by mfrank · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm 43 years old, and when I was a kid I'd spend all morning on Saturday sitting in the living room watching a box that would occasionally tell me I'd really like to have this. My parents knew how to say "no", though, and if I made a scene I'd get spanked.

      Madison Avenue isn't the problem. It's the idiots who think *every* child can grow up to be a functional adult without some of them occasionally getting their asses whipped by their parents. Or even, god forbid, by their teachers.

    2. Re:Underrated by cagle_.25 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm sorry; that's unbelievably simplistic. Or perhaps trollsome.

      We're talking about advertisers intentionally making it *more* difficult for parents to instill discipline in their children, and you're blaming the parents?!

      Reality check: being a parent of a two-year-old and a six-month-old means that you are devoting approximately 30% of your processor time already to making sure that the kids aren't (a) harming themselves, (b) harming others, (c) making a mess, (e) being properly fed and clothed, and (f) learning how to interact like reasonable human beings. That's the involved parents; the loser parents just ignore the kids until they scream.

      Walking down the grocery store aisle with one kid in the seat and one kid walking means that *if* you want to actually choose a product and place it in the cart, you will have to stop holding the two-year-old's hand and focus on the products.

      Your two-year-old, being smart like her daddy, might just decide that now is the optimal moment to go for something interesting, like flashing cereal boxes. Now what, Dr. Spock? I suppose you're going to "instill discipline" right there and she'll just straighten right up for you.

      News flash: unless you want to make every infraction a capital [1] offense, your kid will buck your will on a regular basis. The smart parent will decide which battles are worth fighting and which ones are worth reasoning through ... and reasoning through with them takes time.

      In short, getting a kid to the point where he or she has self-discipline requires ... um ... time and patience [2]. You have to have self-discipline yourself to pull it off, which means that you can't expect to press the magical "discipline" button and have them behave. Have fun raising your own kids.




      [1] Nothing short of the death penalty will guarantee compliance. My daughter responds pretty well to time-outs, but I spent part of my childhood proving that my dad couldn't spank me hard enough to make me obey him.

      [2] As in, I haven't had time for any hobby coding projects since my first daughter was born.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  20. Will it REALLY make you buy the item? by Ipeunipig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know it mentions children, who are extremely impressionable, but how many of you are actually influenced by advertisment. Especially of existing items that have not and probably will not change. If you already know what the item is, what it tastes like/does, will repetitiveness really make you more suseptable(sp) to buy that item? The only point I have ever seen in any advertisement is for new products or changes to existing products. Pretty much, If I want something, I know what I want and go and get it. Flashy pictures will not persuade me to get Frosted Flakes over Capt Crunch.

  21. Porn? Feh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How many times can you watch some dude pumping his schlong into some chick before finally getting bored with it all and going out to find the real thing? The only positive thing about porn is that it's a better contraceptive than contraceptives.

  22. Re:The Wolf in Sheep's Clothing by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cost of the food, as you point out, is only a small portion of the true cost of a product.

    You have to account for that "everything else" BEFORE you can think about the extra cost of the digital display. Just because you have put ePaper on a cereal box doesn't mean you don't have to market it or ship it. The cost of that display is above and beyond everything else, and must directly eat in to the profit margin.

  23. Re:Just what the environment needs by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could minimize that buy requiring a deposite.

    However, our problem with trash is not volume of space, it's how we manage it.
    We could dig a hole in the middle of the US 3x3x3 miles in size, double the estimated amount of trash we will create in the next 1000 years, and it wouldn't be half full.

    Putting tiny dumps near places where people live is not the best way to manage it anymore.
    Truck it out of neighborhood, swap the trashholder with an empty one, trainf the garbage to a nation wide cetral location.

    I would create 10 smaller one it different locations, depending on major train stops.
    10 smaller one would be easier to create and manage.

    It's abig project, but so was Golden Gate, the Empire state Building, and the Hover Dam.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. What this could be useful for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One word: standard packaging. If you have boxes that change their complete look when filled with new goods, this would make recycling easier. No need to wash off previous labels.

  25. Instead of reducing dead-tree useage, *this* ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    R&D scientist : I developed a cheap film to replace replace ink, using very little power. Current resolution is pretty low but with funding, we can probably triple that within 2 years.

    Marketing : Holy shit, do you realize what this means?Just imagine the possibilities!

    R&D scientist : I know, like, within 2-3 generations of the technology might be good enough to replace the majority of day-to-day paper printout. Imagine a little tablet, or "notepad", let's say with a rechargable battery and a wireless link to your computer to upload content. Mindboggling!

    Marketing : Screw that, I'm talking about more ads, we could put this stuff on CEREAL BOXES for christ sake - the film & disposable batteries would be so cheap we could AFFORD TO THROW IT AWAY. Woohoo, I'm going to be RICH!

    Assholes.