Slashdot Mirror


Robot Saves the Day at Radiation Lab

An anonymous reader writes "Nature.com is reporting that records released this week by the US defense department read almost like a bad movie plot. Back in October a high-security radiation lab had a cylinder filled with radiation get trapped in its delivery tube network. Fortunately a specially designed bomb-disposal robot was able to retrieve the canister before the radiation was able to eat its way free.

55 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Dupe by ajwitte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dupe of http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/ 17/0226200&tid=216&tid=14 This version links to a different story though... (fp?)

    --
    chown -R us ~you/base
    1. Re:Dupe by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same story, different news source.

      Not that it seems to make any difference, but do the editors ever read the stories? *EVER*?

      Sheesh.

    2. Re:Dupe by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, we really get tired of MOST of the dupes here and as we have discussed before, sometimes dupes are a good thing because we don't get all the stories because we're not connected all the time.

      This is the first I have seen this story posted here although judging by some of the comments, a quick search would display the duplicate story.
      I wonder if there should be a notification icon or something to denote dupes though. Just to appease the dupe hating crowd.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:Dupe by luna69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As was this: "...a cylinder filled with radiation..."

      Radiation is a phenomenon, not a thing. The cylinder was filled with materials which were radioactive.

      Sigh.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  2. Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First the "Robot Saves Troops" story and now this. Pretty cool how robots are actually helping us nowadays.

    "By now, the robot had been in the radiation zone for 90 minutes. The team decided to regroup, but the robot's electronics had failed and it was rooted to the spot. Thankfully, the team had tied a rope around the machine, and it was hauled in, almost knocking over a radiation shield in the process."

    This part sounds remarkably familiar...

    "On the third day, and after three weeks of continuous warning sirens..."

    Whoah. It took them THREE DAYS? I'm glad this wasn't (obviously) a really serious problem. If it were some sort of radiation based bomb, they'd get fried.

    From reading these two articles, it seems that if we could somehow shield these robots from outside radiation, these jobs would be done in a flash.

    Unfortunately, we need them to recieve radation because if they DON'T, we can't communicate with them.

    Now, I'm not a physicist, but might a Faraday Cage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage) built with an appropriately sized mesh do the job? Just as a microwave lets some radiation out (we can see the burrito cooking inside) while keeping the harmful radiation in (we don't get toasted by the microwaves), couldn't this be used to do the reverse, that is, allow communication in while shielding the robot from radiation?

    I realize that these cages must be in a specific shape to work correctly, but if the core components at least, can be shielded, this go a long way towards solving our problems.

    Heck, the arms and stuff we can even make (god forbid) mechanical, perhaps in such a way that they won't get owned by the radiation at all.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by ajwitte · · Score: 5, Informative
      Now, I'm not a physicist, but might a Faraday Cage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage) built with an appropriately sized mesh do the job? Just as a microwave lets some radiation out (we can see the burrito cooking inside) while keeping the harmful radiation in (we don't get toasted by the microwaves), couldn't this be used to do the reverse, that is, allow communication in while shielding the robot from radiation?
      A Faraday cage would only be effective against EM waves, not against particle emissions.
      --
      chown -R us ~you/base
    2. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by cbreaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, you solved it. Good job. Too bad these folks that play with this ultra-radioactive cobalt (the kind that kills you in 30 seconds or less) every day didn't think of that.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by InvalidError · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A centimeter worth of lead would stop most of the lower-energy stuff.

      The story is kinda ironic: the irradiated cobalt was intended to test electronics against radiation. So, the robotics lab that lended the robot got a free test-run to verify their radiation tolerance calculations.

      Note to would-be evil geniuses: put your bombs in shells made of irradiated cobalt isotopes, it may disable would-be bomb-disposal robots and personnel before they can do anything about it. Radiation labs will get a free test of their security measures and delivery tubes out of the deal.

    4. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 4, Informative
      Now, I'm not a physicist, but might a Faraday Cage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage) built with an appropriately sized mesh do the job? Just as a microwave lets some radiation out (we can see the burrito cooking inside) while keeping the harmful radiation in (we don't get toasted by the microwaves), couldn't this be used to do the reverse, that is, allow communication in while shielding the robot from radiation?

      I realize that these cages must be in a specific shape to work correctly, but if the core components at least, can be shielded, this go a long way towards solving our problems.

      It isn't the shape of the Faraday cages that's special. It's the size of the mesh. The mesh has to be significantly smaller then the wavelength of the radiation you are trying to keep out. Microwaves have a wavelength of 1-300mm. The wave-length of gamma rays is less then 0.00000000001mm. That's much smaller then the distance between atoms in a typical solid, so the idea of a mesh becomes kind of absurd.

      I doubt that the problem with shielding is communications. After all you could put the shielding on the side facing the radiation, and leave the side towards the crew open. Gamma radiation doesn't go around corners. Or, as others have suggested, you could just run a cable to the robot. I think the actual problem is weight. Lead is heavy. You might be able to pile a ton of lead around the cpus and memroy, and just crank up the horsepower of the motors. However, by their very purpose you can't put the sensors behind lead sheilds, since all they would see then would be the lead shield. Not very helpful.
    5. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually Cobalt 60 is a Gamma emitter. Gamma is EM but very high frequency. The majority of the radiation from it is not particle radiation unless you count photons are particle radiation.
      The holes in the shielding on a microwave have to be smaller than the wavelength of the microwaves. Gamma has a wavelength smaller than visible light so the holes would have to be too small for even light to pass through. It is also a lot more energetic so the thin metal shielding used in a microwave wouldn't be of much use. So a faraday cage "could" work if it was thick enough and had small enough crystal structure the be effective the only problem is I don't know of any material that meets those requirements off the top of my head. A high density shield of say, lead would be far simpler.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by jlaxson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Distance helps a ton when protecting against a radiation source. Assuming the source radiates in all directions, the amount of radiation received is proportional to the surface area of a sphere at whatever radius. I know for electromagnetic radiation it can be measured in mW/cm^2, not sure what the appropriate exposure unit is for gamma radiation. At 100 yards, the amount of radiation received is 120,000 times less than at 1 yard, and so forth.

      --
      On Apple Input Peripherals: They're okay, I guess, but I was really hoping for a one-key keyboard and a 109-button mouse
    7. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by Aglassis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is there anything tough enough to sheild against these particle emissions?

      Depends on what it is. For alpha and beta particles, generally a couple pieces of paper will be an effective shield (since the particles are charged, they interact electrically--the alpha more so than the electron). For neutrons, a highly hydrogenated substance, such as water or polycarbonate, will be effective slowing down neutrons to thermal energies. It depends on the energy of the initial neutron, but typically you need only a few feet. You can then easily capture the neutrons in the end with a boronated substance. For gamma rays, any substance that is very dense will do since it will give the incident photon more chances to react. Each time the photons interact with a electrons (or occasionally, a nucleus), Compton scattering occurs and the re-emitted photons (now a spherical wavefront) now have a lower frequency. Given a thick enough dense substance, such as lead, very few high energy gamma rays will sneak through.

      In general, only neutron and gamma radiation is significant for radiation workers or equipement because alphas and betas are so easy to shield.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    8. Re:Radiation - Seems to be a recurring problem. by Forbman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gamma radiation is very high energy (and short wavelength) EM radiation. Neutrons are...neutrons. Alpha particles are Helium nuclei, and Beta radiation is positron radiation. That's about it for the types of radioactive decay radiation [sic].

      A sheet of paper is sufficient to block alpha particles. A thin sheet of wood will effectively block beta radiation. Lead works well for neutrons, and a LOT of lead is required for gamma radiation.

      Read back on the experiments with that B-36 that had a nuclear reactor on it. The crew area at the front was protected from the otherwise unshielded reactor core by something like 20 *tons* of lead...

  3. Interesting..... what application? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the base's Gamma Irradiation Facility was paralysed when a cylinder containing cobalt-60 became lodged in one of the lab's air-pressure tubes,

    Yikes! Cobalt-60 is almost as bad as it gets. Cobalt 60 radiation dosages are almost twice as bad as the actual dosage of radiation one would get from the fallout of an actual atomic device which sort of begs the question of what they are doing with it? Are they modeling fallout? Or are they experimenting with dirty bombs? Lining the inside of atomic devices with heavy metals and other elements is a way to create much more radioactive bombs that have long lasting radiation effects.

    Although there *are* civilian applications such as medical therapy devices....

    The canister, about the size of a salt cellar, was jammed against a seesaw-shaped switch inside the tube that was stuck in the wrong orientation.

    OK, so this sounds like bad design just waiting for someone to screw up and reveal the design flaw.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Interesting..... what application? by Malor · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article that I read several days ago said that they use the cobalt-60 to test radiation resistance... they want to see the effects that high radiation levels will have on various pieces of military and civilian hardware. They set up their test gear, shuttle in the cobalt via pneumatic tube, let the gear cook in the extremely intense radiation, and then shuttle the cobalt back into a 'safe' area. I believe the original article claimed that cobalt is good for this, because it doesn't make the whole area permanently radioactive, though I'm not familiar with the reason why. (gamma radiation, maybe???)

      The writeup on the article is misleading. Radiation doesn't 'eat its way free'... fer chrissake, people! Acids eat things. Radiation just ... radiates. And it was ALREADY free, that's why the needed the darn robot. That whole testing area was absolutely lethal to human beings, even in heavy protective gear. Even the robot couldn't survive it very long... they thought 50 minutes. In actual practice, it lasted longer... but the movement system did fail, so they had to drag it out with a rope.

      To the person asking about building a Faraday cage around it.... as far as I know, a Faraday cage isn't an absolute barrier, it's just a very strong one. It attenuates a signal by a very great deal, making signals interception very difficult. But in this case, the 'signal' (the cobalt) is so incredibly powerful that a Faraday cage would just take the edge off, as it were. If my limited understanding of radiation is correct, it'd be just about as effective as sunglasses in front of a supernova. (and I'm not sure that Faraday cages even *work* at these frequencies... the radiation might just punch right through the shield material.)

    2. Re:Interesting..... what application? by sickofthisshit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not the speed of light per se, but the fact that conductors need to conduct *current*, and the current is made up of electrons, which have a finite mass (and, therefore, inertia) a finite charge (and, therefore, a finite amount of current is created when one is moving), and a finite number of them in a given volume.

      Metals work as good conductors through the visible because the electrons can move quickly enough in the metal to keep up with the changes in the electric field. With increasing frequency, at some point the electrons will be unable to keep up. This frequency is called the "plasma" frequency; roughly, omega_p^2 = 4 pi n e^2/m, where n is the number of electrons per volume, e is the electron charge, and m is the effective mass of the electron.

      Above this frequency, the electrons cease to be effective Faraday shields against electromagnetic radiation. Instead, the acceleration of the electrons causes the electromagnetic radiation to be scattered and dissipate energy through Compton scattering.

      Gamma radiation is far above the plasma frequency in all metals. To gamma rays, all material basically looks like a bunch of point charges to scatter off of. So you use something like lead which gets about as much electrons in a small space as possible.

  4. Not Really by MrNonchalant · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It sounds like something you might pitch to a Hollywood studio. A high-security US radiation lab is thrown into turmoil when a cylinder spewing out deadly radiation gets trapped in its network of delivery tubes. A robot is sent to try and free the canister before the radiation eats away at its circuits. After a string of failures, the intrepid machine saves the day."

    Not hardly. For that you'd need Tommy Lee Jones and terrorists to some how get involved.

  5. Filled with Radiation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I didn't know 'radiation' was tangable. I'll have to update the Wikipedia article...

  6. A little time discrepancy... by FearTheFrail · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "On the third day, and after three weeks of continuous warning sirens..."

    Whoah. It took them THREE DAYS? I'm glad this wasn't (obviously) a really serious problem. If it were some sort of radiation based bomb, they'd get fried.


    Questions are begged:

    1. Was it the robot that had been used for three days?
    2. Or was that just how long the cobalt had been in there?
    3. ...either way, what in the hell is triggering warning sirens for three weeks straight in a big-time radiation lab?
    --
    ___ In the words of Gen. Douglas McArthur: "I'll be right back."
    1. Re:A little time discrepancy... by fossa · · Score: 4, Informative

      The cobalt was stuck for three weeks. The warning sirens are a government regulation, something to do with informing workers of radiation source. The robot was brought in, but it took a while for the team (from Albuquerque) to get ready to go to White Sands with their robot.

      This slashdot article is dupe. See sandia.gov for more poorly written details.

      No, they wouldn't be fired; they work at a national lab :-P Seriously though, electronics that can handle intense radiation are expensive.

    2. Re:A little time discrepancy... by InvalidError · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFA says the alarm was caused by a cylinder wedged inside a transport tube by a defective switch and that it took them three weeks (presumably of trying everything available in-house) to come up with the robot idea.

      The /. article could have been titled "Mighty Mouse strikes back" - TFA says the robot used was called "Mighty Mouse 2".

  7. Still, it all comes down to the ol'screwdriver by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the third day, and after three weeks of continuous warning sirens, the team sent in the robot with a metal screwdriver. It unscrewed the plate, dislodged the switch, and sent the tube safely to its storage bay.

    Dude you mean the government spent $24 million on this project and all we needed to fix it was a screwdriver?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  8. radiation eating its way free? by snStarter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean say WHAT? Are the little gamma rays gonna start taking apart the shielding? I dont' think so. They can destroy the solid state components of the robot of course.

    So not only is it a DUP the right-up is by someone whose entire education about radiation appears to have come from watching 1950s science fiction movies.

    OR misread the article.

    1. Re:radiation eating its way free? by mj2k · · Score: 3, Informative

      you're quite correct... a Co-60 source isn't going to eat through the cicuitry... That's just stupid... It can produce enough heat to melt circuits (assuming it's a very high-fluence source), but the article must've been written by someone ignorant of health physics, since it's quite obvious Co-60 isn't an acid, eating through a container... Finally, these sort of tests were likely done for gamma spectroscopy, where you can use gammas to examine imperfections in materials(it is probably the most common radioactive isotope used in nuclear labs today).

    2. Re:radiation eating its way free? by Erik+Noren · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ohio University has its own reactor which is used for experiments in power generation as well as irradiation of materials. Anyone from nearby colleges can request time with the reactor to irradiate just about anything they want.

      To get the material close to the core, pressurized tubes are used. The canisters that hold the material are made of some sort of plastic-like material for the specific purpose of letting radiation pass through. The problem is, repeated exposure causes the material to become brittle and occasionally a canister will break on the return trip (most often, it seems, when it slams into the retrieval portion of the tube and comes to a halt.)

      The tubes are necessary to prevent people from coming into close contact with materials that are still radioactive for a time. The person running the experiment only has to load the canister with the material they wish to irradiate, load it in the tube system and send it on its way. The system halts when the tube reaches the core. After some time, the experimenter recalls the canister and can do whatever they please with it, knowing that it will still be emitting small amounts of radiation.

      I don't know what the procedure was in the case that a canister failed during transit and material was caught somewhere between source and core. I do know the reactor is not very big (but neat to watch glow in the water) and the radiation danger wasn't too great. I believe it was said that most of the remaining radiation from the material dissipates within 5 minutes of the return. There are tables and shielding boxes with timers on them near the retrieval area.

      The point is that radiation can eat through materials. It may not be the best way to phrase what really happens, but materials exposed to radiation react differently. Many materials become brittle. A radiation source as strong as the one in the article (with no mention as to what the cylinder was composed of) could cause any number of problems for anything nearby. The tubes are meant for short exposures as a material passes through, not prolonged exposure of a stuck cylinder.

  9. Not to be picky by lifebouy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But "radiation" can't be stored in a container. Radioactive material, however, can be. Add to that the fact that the submitter was anonymous, and this story should not have been picked up. Hmm. I wonder whats on digg right now.

    --
    Drop me a line at:
    Key ID: 0x54D1D809
    1. Re:Not to be picky by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But "radiation" can't be stored in a container. Radioactive material, however, can be. Add to that the fact that the submitter was anonymous, and this story should not have been picked up. Hmm. I wonder whats on digg right now.

      Damn straight. It's ignoramuses like the anonymous submitter who keep irradiated food off the market when there's no rational reason for it. I could be dining off vacu-packed and irradiated steaks all week on a backcountry hiking trip, but because a bunch of dumbshits don't know the difference between "radiation" and "radioactive" I'm stuck with MREs and freeze dried crap.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  10. Please..... by fractalrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...tell me the poster is joking around with the 'filled with radiation' and 'before the radiation was able to eat its way free' comments.

    I was filled with radiation once.....once.

  11. coming to a theater near you by Huh? · · Score: 2, Funny

    I smell the next "based on a true story" hollywood stinker. Whoopee!!

  12. Inspired by Actual Events by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

    The blockbuster event of Summer 2006: Robot Hero

    Starring Ben Affleck as the fucking robot.

  13. Flood the tube? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they couldn't get the cannister out, would flooding the tube with some form of radiation blocking/absorbing material have worked? Maybe they could have injected it with molten lead, leaded water, or some other radiation dampening material (probably not a permanent solution, but a time-giver).

    1. Re:Flood the tube? by Shimbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they couldn't get the cannister out, would flooding the tube with some form of radiation blocking/absorbing material have worked? Maybe they could have injected it with molten lead, leaded water, or some other radiation dampening material.

      Nah, it would just make it messier to deal with, and unlikely to very effective - you need a good mass of material to stop hard gamma, and a transport tube is not a good place to try to contain a radioactive liquid.

      Rule 1 of radiation protection: inverse square law beats shielding; just stay the fuck away until it cools off a bit or you get a better plan.

  14. Cobalt 60's properties by Robotbeat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cobalt 60 decays via Beta (electron) emission (and also emits an anti-neutrino), and has a half-life of 5.2714 years. Of course, electrons don't go far in air and are easily shielded, but Co60 emits gamma-rays (like very "blue" X-Rays) with an energy of 1.33 and 1.17 MeV (MeV= the energy it takes to move an electron from a long ways away to a potential of 1 million volts). Co60 is commonly used in industry for sterilizing and for killing off bacteria on food (it is also used in gamma-ray photography industrially). Cobalt 60 can be produced from bombarding iron with nuclear radiation, like inside a nuclear reactor or near a nuclear explosion.
    Wikipedia article about Cobalt

  15. That's a job for *Lead* (and prior planning.) by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Radiation shielding is a job that lead does fairly effectively. It's possible to design electronics that are much more radiation-tolerant than conventional electronics, which is why so much NASA and other satellite gear is low-CPU-horsepower antique-looking stuff (e.g. when the Space Shuttle crew first took a Compaq 386 laptop up with them, it had significantly more CPU than the entire rest of the equipment on board, but it's not designed to last a long time in radiation environments.) But if you don't have a weight constraint, lead's your friend. Takes a bit of work to get video cameras shielded well, if you need to point the camera at the radiation source, and if that's likely to be a frequent problem, building in a bunch of spare cameras is a good idea, and cheap.

    Radioactive bomb disposal is fortunately not a frequently-encountered problem - most bomb-handling robots are more designed for conventional explosives, and while it's nice to have well-protected electronics, you'll only need to replace them if the bomb explodes, at which point it's no longer an emergency so cheap easily-replaced parts are just as good. However, Sandia Labs is the kind of place where radioactive explosive Bad Things can happen, and you'd think they'd have some rad-hard bomb-handler robots. After all, their job is designing and building Weapons of Mass Destruction.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:That's a job for *Lead* (and prior planning.) by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US no longer builds nuclear weapons. They actually are dismantling some. Sandia does a lot of SIMULATIONS of such weapons. I'm sure they have materials around to gather data for the simulations but they don't make bombs anymore. When the bombs were made, most were made at a facility outside Amarillo, TX.

    2. Re:That's a job for *Lead* (and prior planning.) by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 3, Informative

      We are still producing all the components, including a recently revitalized capability to manufacture the fissile pit (technical term for the uranium or plutonium core). We didn't have that ability for about a decade, but have been able to in small quantities again for a few years.

      Bombs were being completely dissassembled and rebuilt throughout, for reliability testing and analysis purposes. In some cases, most or all of the other components were replaced.

    3. Re:That's a job for *Lead* (and prior planning.) by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason they don't build nuclear bombs anymore is that they do have so much of them that you could easily destroy the whole planet by breaking it in several parts or at least destroying the whole crust and causing a nuclear winter.

      Watch wor them starting again as soon as we find an alien lifeform on some other planet.

      By the way: Recently i saw some "oh, the us army/navy/whatever is sooo cool! they rule the world"-tv-reportage, where they said that ONE ship of usa's biggest submarine class has the nuclear power of 3600 hiroshima nuclear bombs!
      3600!!! this is enough to destroy a whole continent with every city on it!!
      Now guess how many of those ships exist, and what else exists.

      If this is not the most criminal thing of every lifeform in this solar system, then i don't know...

      Oh wait... the most criminal thing is that poeple actually accept it (proven by the fact that it still exists and nearly nothing changes).

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:That's a job for *Lead* (and prior planning.) by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Now they are working on much higher yeild FUSION bombs.

      WORKING? I read about hydrogen (H-)bombs in the late 80s. Here some quick facts: They...

      - have 3600 times the power of the hiroshima bomb
      - use a nuclear bomb as a fuse (!!!) because nothign else can (or could back then) create so high tempratures that teh reaction can start (some million degrees)
      - use heavy (somewhat radioactive) water as explosive, working in a similar way as the sun by making helium out of hydrogen. (which is easyer with heavy water because it already has the needed neutrons i guess...)
      - the usa is not the only country that owns them, but it owns (as usual) the most of them.

      And: YES, you can kill a small continent with them.

      P.S.: Wait for the first rusty ones to explode in russia in the next 10-20 years... ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  16. So many questions... by komodotoes · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm unsure why it took 2 days to decide to unscrew a panel and 2 attempts to decide that plastic screwdrivers don't work worth poo. Or why they have a "1950's document delivery system" transporting extremely dangerous items. The real heroes of the story: the metal screwdriver and the rope used to haul the broken robot out.




    NeverEndingBillboard.com

  17. Gamma Imaging for Non-destructive testing by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    My guess is that they're using it to do testing of aircraft components or other heavy military equipment. Some days X-Rays just don't penetrate well enough to image the things that you want, and you need something stonger, and for some applications, gamma rays do the job well. For other applications, you want various different kinds of beams from cyclotrons/synchrotrons/etc., such as protons or whatever. So you've gone and flown your airplane past its design parameters, or crashed your tank into walls and bounced around the crash test dummies, and you want to find out how badly you've bent the metal. Gamma ray imaging might be what you need. Or not.

    I forget if they also use gamma rays to image concrete, or if that's other kinds of radiation, but there are times you want to crash the tank into the wall and see how badly you bent the wall.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  18. Re:someone smarter to me by X-rated+Ouroboros · · Score: 2, Informative

    Irradiation doesn't make things radioactive. Exposure to a neutron flux can cause materials to become activated, but unless you've got a nuclear reactor around this isn't likely to be a problem.

    --
    Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
  19. Re:The answer by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ultrasonic modem, the sound waves pass through the shielding and back to the base, or to an ultrasonic microphone and emitter pair on a long wire, since those components would be less sensative than digital circuits

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  20. Re:someone smarter to me by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cobalt-60 emits gamma radiation, which is comprised of high-energy photons. Photons only react with electrons, not nuclei, so if element X is exposed to them, it will still be element X afterwards, with its atomic number and mass unchanged.

  21. In Soviet Russia robot sends YOU in. by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mayak, where the Soviet Union pumped out tens of tons of plutonium for nuclear weapons. Some info on how the Soviets fixed the 'it got stuck' problems - no fancy robots for them. http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=so9 9larin "A complete repair would have taken at least 12 months..." ""That meant that the irradiated uranium fuel had to be pulled up by hand into the central hall of the reactor and placed in a special storage area. Then, when the repair was finished, the elements had to be loaded back into the reactor. Over time, we unloaded and reloaded 39,000 fuel elements. All of the plant's personnel took part in this work and they received huge doses of radiation. The repairs were finished in two months." "several hundred kilograms of freshly irradiated nuclear fuel got stuck--men from everywhere in the plant were called out, and one after another they used long steel rods to push the elements into the apparatus. The only protection they had was cotton overalls and gloves."

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  22. Re:The answer by maird · · Score: 3, Informative

    Our local county bomb disposal team has a robot and they only use fibre for remote control to avoid having any EM radiation (even from electrical signaling on copper) triggering the device being handled. I can't believe a small county in Utah is bleeding edge with their robot!

  23. Unfortunately... by Psychor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unfortunately the robot failed anyway, with only 5 minutes left until the radiation leaked out, destroying civilisation in an evil terrorist plot. Bruce Willis had to throw himself into the chamber and heroically sacrifice his life in order to correct the problem manually. After fixing the radiation leak, he managed to crawl into and activate an experimental cryogenic chamber stored in the same room, before expiring from the overdose of radiation. The probability of him being revived for a sequel is high.

    1. Re: Unfortunately... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Bruce Willis had to throw himself into the chamber and heroically sacrifice his life in order to correct the problem manually. After fixing the radiation leak, he managed to crawl into and activate an experimental cryogenic chamber stored in the same room, before expiring from the overdose of radiation. The probability of him being revived for a sequel is high.

      I thought that was a Star Trek episode.

      No, wait - an Andromeda episode.

      Or maybe an SG-1 episode.

      Or was it an Angel episode? Or maybe Buffy.

      It's so hard to keep your heros straight, when they all do the same thing.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Unfortunately... by funwithBSD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bruce Willis NEVER dies in his movies... unless he is costaring with Brad Pitt, in which case it was a mercy killing.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  24. Re:Apparantly.... by Afecks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparantly, Robots can stop radiation. But they can't save Slashdot editors from dupes...

    More evidence they don't read their own site.


    and apparently you can't spell "Apparently"... more evidence that you don't read what you actually write...

    all kidding aside... my point is that we all make mistakes :P

  25. damn that corrosive radiation by drakewyrm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...before the radiation was able to eat its way free." That's choice. Sounds like the tagline from some poorly-researched sci-fi or action flick. Besides, the radiation was already present outside the canister; otherwise, there would have been no danger to personnel and no radiation alarms sounding.

    As for the comment about the container being filled with radiation, I could excuse that as simply a mistake of terminology. You can fill the container with active or contaminated material, but you can't fill it with radiation itself. Contamination is the shit. Radiation is just the stink.

    A more practical analogy would be light as an example of radiation. You can fill a box with flashlights, and you can shine light inside a box, but you can't fill the box with light.

    The article makes reference to the radiation eating away at the robot's circuits. This is pure speculation, but I think this may have been a reference to the effect that high energy gamma radiation can have on digital circuits such as memory. That would be a bit of a metaphor, not a literal corrosion of the circuitry. Certainly, it does not imply that the canister was in danger of impending failure.

    --
    Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Major: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action
  26. Re:Size of a salt cellar??? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You may not realise, but "salt cellar" (also: "saltcellar") is a perfectly appropriate term for a salt shaker.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  27. Or, to put it another way... by carpevita · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A plucky little expensive robot was destroyed while saving the day recently at the White Sands missile range after gross incompetence in the fields of engineering and risk analysis manifested as a lump of highly radioactive substance becoming stuck in a tube, prompting technicians to attempt to fix the problem basically by kicking it really hard, which broke it even worse, at which point several people valiantly tried to fix the problem with a tool that was not designed for that purpose--since nobody had apparently thought of designing a tool for that purpose--while being continually subjected to blaring sirens and flashing lights, which unfortunately could not be shut off during this tense and delicate operation, leading to much silliness, such as repeatedly barbecuing various bits of plastic. Eventually, they managed to get the pesky thing unstuck while exposing only a couple of people to only a tiny bit of deadly radiation. Somebody then named the robot after a cartoon character.

    The genius who spun this one off on the media is the unsung hero of this story.

  28. That's not true. by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm stuck with MREs and freeze dried crap.

    There are other options. Like meaty travel companions and a big knife.

  29. Tube cannot be filled with radiation by realnihilist · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is impossible for a tube to be filled with "radiation". Radiation would be emitted spherically in all directions from the tube, subject to the inverse square law. That is, unless one was far enough away from the tube for it to be considered a point source. What the tube was filled with is "contamination", which is the source of the radiation. Contamination is the "sh*t"...radiation is the "stink".

  30. Re:Radiation is corrosive.. sort of. by Faeton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    High levels of radiation has a nack for breaking down many materials very quickly. Plastics and organic compounds seem to suffer the most, as the insulation on wiring turns brittle and flaky quite fast at about 1k rem. Working at a CANDU nuclear power plant, everything but the video cameras that monitor the reactor face uses special wires to prevent common short circuits. So you can tell from that that we replace the video cams quite often. Or worse (and usually the case), they stop working and we don't get a front seat view of a LOCA (loss of cooling accident) when it happens =)