Slashdot Mirror


Whedon Calls Death Knell For Firefly

Ant writes "Entertainment Weekly is reporting on the end of Firefly." From the article: "Alas, Whedon's fond memories are also tainted by Serenity's status as a franchise nonstarter; despite Universal's best marketing efforts, the film only mustered $25 million. 'In the end, it was what it was: a tough sell,' says Whedon, adding that it appears the Firefly saga has reached its conclusion. He has no regrets -- and he's moving on."

15 of 641 comments (clear)

  1. Ironic timing.... by aapold · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean, announce the death the day the DVD comes out? DVD sales of the show was what picked it back up in the first place...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Ironic timing.... by DCheesi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But the fans already know there won't be a sequel without strong DVD sales. What this interview seems to be saying is that even with strong sales, Whedon may not be interested in continuing. That makes the buying argument weaker than before, and probably depresses many fans just when you'd want them out hyping your product.

  2. Whedon's last words by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > 'In the end, it was what it was: a tough sell,' says Whedon, adding that it appears the Firefly saga has reached its conclusion.

    "It was a leaf on the wind." *CRUNCH*

    1. Re:Whedon's last words by pcgabe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      (from Hand Puppet Movie Theatre)

      Wash: Oh yeah? I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar!
      Giant Spike: You're a dead leaf now, dude.
      Wash: *TOTALLY UNEXPECTED IMPALEMENT*
      Fans: ...WHAT.
      Zoe: No way did that just happen. Simon can fix this!
      Fans: OMGWTFFJDIAJDJASKDJAKLDJA
      Mal: Run like hell now, strangle Joss Whedon later!
      Fans: *WEEP*

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
  3. I guess by ThePiMan2003 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess you can stop the signal :(.

  4. Re:No rights for it by Psykechan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fox had the rights to the TV show and would not allow it to be made. Universal optioned the rights to a movie but couldn't use the name Firefly which is why they used the name "Serenity".

    It would've been wonderful for more episodes of the show but the moguls wouldn't have it.

    Ah well, it was a great show and it was fun while it lasted. I've got no regrets for supporting the show as much as I had.

    You can't take the sky from me.

  5. Firefly :: BSD? by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even Joss' comments must be taken with a grain of salt. I sincerly doubt that this will be the end of Firefly - considering that currenty, Amazon.com ranks Serenity as the #1 selling DVD, with the complete Firefly series coming in at #6 (again). DVD sales on this franchise are through the roof, and have been the fulcrum upon which the future of the franchise balances.

    Call me what you will, but I don't think we've heard the last of this yet.

    But of course, I could be wrong...

    --
    Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
  6. Re:Well, by egypt_jimbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know a lot of people found themselves enthralled in the whole "cowboys in space" theme, but why I cannot fathom.

    It's not just "cowboys in space". It's about a man who is struggling to stay true to his heart. It's about the crew that grows up around him. It's about extreme civil disobedience in an opressed society. It's about doing what's necessary and about doing what's right. Space is just the scenery.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  7. Very misleading by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article has been linked to a lot over the past few days on various Firefly/Serenity boards. The quotes from Joss have clearly been taken out of context, a quick read-through of the other interviews he's given over the past few days show this. He's found closure because he got to tell the story he wanted to tell from the beginning. But he's said that if he had the chance to tell another story in the 'verse he turn right around and do it. Specifically, he's hinted that another movie would reveal that bounty hunter Jubal Early from the last episode of Firefly is very much alive. I'm a Browncoat but I don't stick my fingers in my ears and go "lalala I can't hear you" when people suggest the franchise has come to an end. But this article is simply trolling. FYI, Joss has confirmed that he's going to write another series of Serenity comics, and has been saying for months that the DVD sales of Serenity will determine whether the franchise will be seen on screens (big or small) in the future. EW are just quoting Joss out of context to stir up some contraversy. I for one am very unimpressed.

  8. Uh, yeah, bit misleading by seasleepy · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a fairly misleading headline/summary/article stub. In (numerous) interviews over the past week or so, Joss says in most of them that any future Firefly/Serenity-age would depend on the DVD sales being particularly big.

    "It would depend on huge numbers from the DVD," writer/director Whedon allows. "Obviously, we are still shy of making our money back from the box office. But we are within shouting distance. Still, it would have to blow up pretty huge for a sequel to be called for.

    "Mind you, stranger things have happened. And they do seem to happen to me. So it's not like I'm shutting the door." -- Toronto Star interview

    "The, um, the movie is finished. And the story is told. The world is not finished. There's more to tell, but that's always the case with everything I do and whether I get the chance to tell [it] or not it is up to somebody else. So I made sure that this movie had completion and didn't feel like a glorified prequel. It's its own piece and it wraps everything up. I have a sense of closure that I never had, and I can walk away satisfied. But if somebody tells me not to walk away, I'll turn right back around." -- Comcast Movies interview

    This EW article seems to take the stance that since Whedon is working on projects other than Firefly/Serenity and is taking a realistic view towards their finances, he clearly has abandoned them, despite the fact that his other projects have been in the pipe for some time.

  9. Re:No rights for it - Translation by DavidRawling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We won't make it and we can't take the chance that someone else will make it, it will be a success and we will be shown to have made yet another bad decision.

    If we don't want it no-one can have it.

  10. Probably a good thing by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Firefly doesn't stop now, then how else are we going to have Firefly: The Next Generation here in twenty years, complete with the new River/Jane-daughter wise-cracking empath, a male companion, a cyborg mechanic, and the psychotic-chained-up Reaver named "Thudd" for comedic relief?

  11. Re:I'm a little shocked... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...that the movie only made $25m, and that marketing is being blamed.

    Actually the movie has grossed 38 million, one million short of the budget. Heres the industry rule of thumb. Box office is 1/5 of the total income from a movie, once you include DVD sales, and showings on television. Production budget is 1/3 of the cost of the movie once you figure in marketing and distribution costs. So the movie cost 117 million and will make about 190 million when all is said and done. Rumor has it they skimped a lot on the marketing, so it will actually be quite a bit more profitable than that. Also, Serenity is the number one DVD sale on Amazon today, so DVD sales may be a lot more than expected. Anyone who thinks it was a "flop" does not know what they are talking about. Not that it was a huge success, as movies go.

  12. Re:Just a thought.... by deanoaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand how you can say that allowing Wash and Book to be killed was an attempt to reach a wider audience.

    If anything I felt that it showed the core audience that this was not an episode of a TV series, where much could be expected to end up the same at the end as at the beginning. New viewers would not know of their earlier contributions to the story and would be much less attached to them.

    I don't see how new viewers can have been a factor in the decision to let them die. New viewers would have gotten the same effect of seriousness if new characters had been added and then killed.

    Also, River had been shown as having a 'super weapon' mode in the Firefly series, where she closed her eyes and killed three armed troops with three shots in about one second, so the movie was not 'turning' her into something new.

    I loved the movie and will own the DVD today (first day out). If nothing else, you finally get to see what a Reaver really looks like.

    --
    If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
  13. False by ThePepe · · Score: 5, Informative

    This little blurb seems completely contrary to

    http://whedonesque.com/comments/9027 and

    http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=22059 (look towards bottom of article).