Slashdot Mirror


Are Americans Addicted to Technology?

jomammy writes "According to a recent Wired article, the majority of Americans are becoming increasingly dependant on their gadgets. High speed internet seems to be the one most determined to be a 'necessity'. A third of the country is said to pay more than $200.00 a month for their addiction, where 4 out of 10 pay between $100.00 and $150.00 a month. Other items in this list of 'gadgets' include, mp3 players, dvd players, laptops, handhelds, etc." How addicted are we? How addicted are you?

30 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Help! I keep refreshing Slashdot! Oh no!

  2. Spec-Tech-ular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "According to a recent Wired article, the majority of Americans are becoming increasingly dependant on their gadgets."

    And Japan is what? In the dark ages?

    1. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and europe doesnt like their cell-phopnes at _all_

  3. addiction by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can quit any time I want.

    1. Re:addiction by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I told my wife "To prove how much I love you, I'd give up the internet for a year. To prove how much you love me, you won't ask me to."

    2. Re:addiction by rgoldste · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quitting is easy. I've done it several times already.

    3. Re:addiction by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd have to say that "addiction" is a badly overused term these days. Anytime someone has a bad habit, they'll call it an addiction, as if doing so removes any responsibility for changing their behavior.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:addiction by DCstewieG · · Score: 5, Funny

      I brought up a similar rhetorical question with my girlfriend....boy was that barking up the wrong tree. I hope you got a better response than me! We're fine but that night was a bit awkward.

  4. Pfft by seinman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, please. This is just more useless drivel written to sell magazines. Just because something makes your life easier or more fun, doesn't mean everyone is "addicted" because they enjoy using it. Are Americans adicted to tooth brushes, too? 99% of us admit to using them at least daily! OH NO!

    1. Re:Pfft by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. We are not "addicted" to technology or gadgets or music or food or any number of other things that enrich our lives. I have a friend in psychology (actually neuroscience), and he often emphasises that in diagnosis, the difference between "something you like" and "addiction" is "does it disrupt the person's ability to live their life?" If the thing in question makes the person do questionable things, hurt themselves, or otherwise make it difficult for them to live a normal and happy life, then it is addiction (similarly, most psych conditions, like "depression" are analyzed in terms of how much it affects a person's ability to live their life, achieve their goals, etc.).

      All of this to say that you cannot classify our like of technology as an "addiction." Are we selling our first-born children in order to satisfy our lust for new gadgets? Hardly. Is this fixation with technology making it difficult for us to live our lives? No. (In fact the technology sometimes makes our lives easier--hence it is a (partially) pragmatic desire.)

      I find the hyperbole of "we are addicted to X" annoying (where X, these days, is often "video games" or "the internet" or whatever). I don't go into convulsions when I don't read slashdot for a day. I am employable and happy. I certainly wouldn't be stealing TVs and selling them on the black market in order to satisfy my insane lust for slashdot...

    2. Re:Pfft by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I think a more compelling question would be: Is all this technology making us more productive? Or does it simply facilitate our slacking off with more diversions?

      What a strange way to think of life. Is life all about being "productive"? I'd have thought the gadgets are supposed to make our lives better, however you wish to define better. Making it more productive makes it sound as if the only purpose to being alive is work and produce a product. Is that really what you think it's all about?

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Pfft by flyonthewall · · Score: 4, Funny

      Until you reach the magic number of 42 it is.

      Squeek!

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    4. Re:Pfft by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is all this technology making us more productive?

      Ah, how I wish I could take you back in a time machine to the late 60's, then the 1920's. On our first stop in the 60's, I'd take you around various companies and show you the massive number of keypunchers, programmers, analysts, and other Managment Information Systems people who keep their companies working. I'd then take you to a company too small for a mainframe and let you witness the poor fellows struggle with mountains of paperwork.

      On our next stop, we'd drop by the 1920's. No automation here. You can literally find hundreds of typists per company, all lined up in rows. Secretaries abound, filing documents left and right. Personal assistents follow company executives around, keeping track of every minor detail. In short, lots of manpower for a return that we can realize today with a few PCs and other electronic gadgets.

      I haven't even gotten into manufacturing, and how technology has changed the world there.

      In short, technology has made us more productive. It doesn't always seem like it with all the technological distractions we now have, but you have to understand that the efficiency of modern technology is what gives us time and energy for those distractions. The greatest challenge today is to find better ways of optimizing business and personal matters. All the low-hanging fruit has already been realized, so we're on to the difficult part of squeezing out efficiency a few percent at a time.

    5. Re:Pfft by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      Are we selling our first-born children in order to satisfy our lust for new gadgets?

      Exactly which gadgets did you have in mind?

      --
      John
    6. Re:Pfft by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly right. We have become more efficient--so much so that the four day work week has been a serious economic consideration since the 80's. The reason is that we have so much technological leverage that the only alternative is to create mountains of useless garbage and convince people that they need it... oh, right, this would include all those technological gadgets. :) But wander through a super department store sometimes and ask yourself, if half of this stuff disappeared tomorrow, would anyone really miss it? Choice isn't of much benefit if most of what is being offered is bad, and it's hard to tell the difference. Even brand names mean nothing now; when was the last time you were able to buy a good pair of Levis? A lot of this stuff is just landfill--either nobody buys it, and it goes directly into the trash, or someone buys it, and discovers that it's trash shortly thereafter. Either way, it's garbage--wasted time, energy, and resources.

      But when you consider how much time people waste with technology, you should also consider that executives could and did waste the same amount of time via their manpower driven alternatives, requesting pointless information, endless re-edits of documents (requiring the secretarial pool to retype the same document, with minor changes, over and over,) and maintaining expensive entourages that required far more time to manage than you can spend instant messaging your friends. And I do mean required--you don't have to instant message your friends, but you did have to manage your staff.

      My wife worked at a law firm. The old lawyers, not comfortable with technology, used their computers to play solitaire, while dictating into tape recorders and getting secretaries to type the letter, over and over and over again as they read it and noticed mistakes. The younger lawyers typed their letters directly into their computer, edited it there, and got exactly what they wanted directly. The old guard took three days to produce the letter, the young ones took half an hour. The difference in efficiency, and sheer cost, is staggering. Of course, the old boys just passed these costs on to their clients...

  5. the first step is admitting you have a problem by cygnus · · Score: 4, Funny
    How addicted are we? How addicted are you?
    shut up shut up shut up!!

    :)

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  6. How addicted? by PasteEater · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I'm on vacation and I'm reading Slashdot.

    That about says it all.

    --
    There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  7. Hey.. by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are Americans Addicted to Technology?

    They misspelled 'porn'.

  8. Addicted? Or Dependant? by taskforce · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Does dependant necessarily == addicted?

    If this is the case, am I addicted to food?

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
  9. Clinical addiction or Gorwing soft. by Irvu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we are talking cliniacal definitions of addiction, i.e. falsely convinced that we cannot live without something and willing to orob/maim/kill/destroy our lives, to obtain it then it depends. I think ther we need to specify the technology in question.

    If we are talking a general "growing too soft/dependent upon specific tech" then I would say yes, especially with the internet. I know far too many people who feel the need to have a machine up all the time.

    But I think we should really go more basic than that; Electricity.

    The standards that we are used to in America, and the rest of the industrialized world (stable, widely available power that rarely if ever goes down) is a) uncommon in the rest of the world, and b) an anomoly in human existence. Few of my peers know how to make a fire or even what to do when the power goes down (hint, the electric can opener will no longer work).

    The level of panic surrounding the Y2k bug should have made this clear to anyone. Far too many people (some of them policymakers) panicked at the thought of "global power outages" and, as Katrina showed, far too many were left stranded, unprepared, and unaided when a real disaster struck.

    In my opinion "addiction" to mp3 players is just icing on the cake.

      in general)I know too many others who *have no clue*

  10. Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Compared to the insanely cool, science-fiction advanced consumer tech, everything from cell phones to high-speed internet available in Europe, Japan and South Korea, the US is dowdy and backwards. Cingular ain't got squat on DoMoCo, and even a Mielle washer/dryer set is lightyears ahead of the stone-age clunkers Kenmore and Maytag inflict on the American household.

    When it comes to technology obsession, the High Street in London and the Akihabara in Tokyo are where it's at.

    SoupIsGood Food

  11. drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by stonebeat.org · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i have friend whose dad is a tech junkie. All kinds of gadgets high-speed, workstation laptops etc. One day his son (my friend) got fed with it all, and moed to middle of Mojave desert, where he get no electricity, and certainly no television signal. And he has to drive 5 miles just to get to the closest payfone.

    But his daughter, who has doesn't even know what a television is, is very wise for her age (i.e. 7 yrs). Here, I make a distinction between knowledge and wisdom. She may not have all the knowledge, but she is certainly wiser then other kids of her age or even some grown ups.

    Would you do something like this? Would you make such a daring move for you children's sake?

    1. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by kebes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you make such a daring move for you children's sake?

      You are purposefully implying, with this question, that it is a good thing (to prevent your child from using technology). Would I do something daring for the sake of my child? You bet. Do I think that removing them from technology represents a case where the child is better off? No.

      Your one data point notwithstanding, I believe that a person is more likely to be happy, healthy, and intelligent if they have access to the full depth and breadth of what the world has to offer (including such things as: travelling to other countries, modern healtcare, books of all types, the internet, learning different languages, etc.).

      Restricting a child's access to tools is silly. Smart kids will be smart no matter what. Giving them access to more of the world will make them more worldly.

  12. Yes. by Valar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm addicted to fire, electricity, housing, cooked food and sharpened metal tools.

    Or maybe sometimes technology improves your life so you use it.

    Addiction is when something makes your life worse, but you keep using it because you are irrationally drawn to it.

  13. Addicted to Taxes, too by renimar · · Score: 5, Funny

    By that reasoning, we must also be addicted to taxes, because I know I pay well more than $200/month in income, sales and other taxes. Who do I talk to about giving up taxes?

    --
    In other news, Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilties Act...
  14. +5 Funny? by jZnat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should be +5 Informative. We all know that the Internet is for porn...

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  15. "Dependent upon the government" by Irvu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I so love that phrase because it suggests weakness of some sort. As if governments didn't exist to protect and help the people and anyone who thinks otherwize deserves a rude awakening.

    In the case of Katrina the very government agencies that we have formed, funded and trained to care for the sick, the elderly, the disposessed of our society, were placed in the hands of self-centered morons whose only interest was in settling the "shirtsleeves up or down" issue. People who could not leave because they were too sick and didn't own cars were being told to "take some cash and drive away". Even now no reliable plan exists to get them home and Karl Rove is directing the reconstruction efforts.

    We form governments to protect us as a whole, because individual humans, however many guns they have, are weak and likely to die. To suggest that people who looked to the government that they supported to help them were "weak" or overly dependent" is in my opinion incorrect. Rather wwe should say that the government failed the people. The government failed in its most essential function. What's worse it did so because people let it fail, perhaps even made it fail not because it should not have succeeded.

  16. How about... by Belial6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about electricity, indoor plumbing, toilets in general. Don't forgent anything to do with farming. Plows, harvesters, trucks to ship food. I would say that if all technology disappeard tomorrow, 99% of the population would die. So, yes we are addicted, as most of the world is.

  17. Steps backwards by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Some things are getting harder.

    My vetenarian was complaining today that she used to have a system which used Ricochet, a dumb terminal in her truck, and a Xenix server in her office to access horse medical records remotely. This provided a 38Kb/s connection. Since Ricochet went out of business, that's no longer possible. Data over cellular is less available, slower, harder to set up, and more expensive. Yes, you can set up a VPN, and "web enable" the server, but it's more trouble than it is worth.

  18. Forest people by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forest tribes are addicted to technology just like americans. They cannot live without bows, arrows, and fire tools.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.