Slashdot Mirror


The World's Most Beautiful Equations?

music4l numb3rs asks: "'An exhibition of the world's most beautiful equations...and some of the ugliest ones too' is how the artist Justin Mullins describes his upcoming show in London. He's exhibiting a number of old favourites such as Maxwell's equations and Euler's relation plus some I've not come across such as entanglement. As for ugliness, he points to the four color theorem. My question to contemplate over the holiday period is: what do Slashdot readers think are the most beautiful equations, and the most ugly ones too?"

17 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory bad chat-up line equation by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Funny

    First thing that sprang into my head when I read the title , those horrible old chat up lines such as :
    Me + you = one beautiful equation
    Me + you =meyou(Meow)

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  2. Much better equation art by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out Bernar Venet. The web site is a bit crap, a flash plugin or something. But click on 'paintings' and explore. Make sure you find the commutative diagrams the size of a house.

  3. Re:Einstein was onto something... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Much overrated as an equation. c is just a constant (and in sensible units c=1) so all it really says is that E=constant*m. This is hardly the stuff of mathematical wet dreams, even if the fact that it's true does have some interest for physicists.

  4. Mine by ClamIAm · · Score: 5, Funny

    1 = 2

    wait

  5. Arithmetic series by Metasquares · · Score: 3, Informative

    sigma(i=1, n) = (n*(n+1))/2. There's something very elegant about being able to reduce a huge number of operations into three.

    p = (2^(n-1)) ((2^n)-1) always struck me as beautiful as well (where p is a perfect number and 2^n - 1 is a Mersenne prime). It just has a sort of symmetry.

  6. Re:e^(i*pi) = -1 by confusion+here · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I prefer the actual Euler's formula instead of the special case. e^x = cosx+jsinx

  7. Re:Einstein was onto something... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny
    The Microsoft Equation:

    $ = (size of lie x price of product x number of suckers x number of PCs x number of years of great products) - (cost of legal defense + cost of penalties + cost of political contributions + cost of Bill's house + cost of Indian programming labor) + K,

    where K = a factor I shall explain but you have to pay me first.

  8. RSA Encryption by DrJimbo · · Score: 3, Informative
    RSA Encryption is based on the general form of Fermat's Theorem:
    x**phi(n) = 1 mod(n)
    where phi(n) is Euler's Totient function which is the number of integers less than n that are relatively prime to n. The number n is chosen to be the product of two primes, p and q. Even if n is known, it is hard of find p and q. Then phi(n) = (p-1)(q-1) and it is easy to pick a d and an e such that
    d * e = 1 mod(phi(n))
    You give out n and e as your public key and use n and d as your private key. Public en/decryption is done with:
    Y = X**e mod(n)
    Private en/decryption is done with:
    X = Y**d mod(n)
    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
  9. Girls are Evil by DeltaHat · · Score: 5, Funny

    A proof more than a formula:

    We all know that girls require time and money, so
    Girls = Time x Money

    We also know that time is money, so
    Time = Money

    Therefore,
    Girls = Money x Money = Money ^ 2

    Furthermore, it is commonly known that money is the root of all evil, so
    Money = sqrt(Evil)

    Therefore,
    Girls = (sqrt(Evil))^2 = Evil

    Hence,
    Girls = Evil

    1. Re:Girls are Evil by j()nty · · Score: 3, Informative

      When you take the square-root of both sides you should allow for a possible change of sign so:

      Girls = +/- Evil

  10. When I posted this there were 42 comments by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 4, Funny

    42

    I win!

    --
    Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
  11. Re:e^(i*pi) = -1 by iced_773 · · Score: 5, Interesting


    No no no.

    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0

    There. Fixed your equation. Now it contains all five principal numbers: e, i, pi, 1, and 0.

  12. The beauty is in the proof. by Vorondil28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to be a humbug, but isn't the beauty of an equation in it's proof? I mean, mathematically, the difference between 2^(3*4)=4096 and e^(pi*i)=-1 isn't a whole lot. The proof, however, for e^(pi*i)=-1 is real mind-bender that culminates in a simple, beautiful little equation. It's that culmination that makes it beautiful, not the equation itself.

    On the other hand, an ugly one would be an equation that's long and complex with just as long and complex a proof.

    Just my $0.02.

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  13. Re:Einstein was onto something... by Quadraginta · · Score: 3, Informative

    You and the OP are probably using different m's. His equation (E = m c^2) is correct at all energies if m is the inertial mass. Your equation is correct if m is the rest mass.

  14. Emmy Noether! by Quadraginta · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can't believe no one mentioned Noether's Theorem, so I'll submit it. Proof that the existence of any symmetry in a Lagrangian implies a conserved quantity.

    Hence, the fact that force laws do not change with time implies conservation of energy, that they do not change with position implies conservation of linear momentum, and that they do not change with rotation implies conservation of angular momentum. Highly awesome.

  15. Lagrange's Theorem by siwelwerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not an equation, but I find Lagranges Theorem (If H is a subgroup of G, then the order of H divides the order of G) to be beautiful in that it is not very obvious at first why this should be true.

  16. Re:The most beautiful equation is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    exp(pi*sqrt(163)) is only a near integer, not an exact one. See Ramanujam constant.