Slashdot Mirror


South Park Turns to Xserve for Storage Upgrade

Lam1969 writes "Computerworld reports that South Park producers are turning away from digital linear tape and direct-attached disk storage to a linear tape open setup complimented by Xserve RAID disk arrays. The show's creators never thought South Park would last nine seasons, so a storage hardware upgrade was necessary. J.J. Franzen, technology supervisor at South Park Studios in Los Angeles, says he chose Apple hardware based on a "gut" feeling. From the article: 'While South Park may appear technologically amateurish with its character cutouts, over the past nine seasons the cartoon series has added a great deal of storage-consuming detail, including backgrounds and crowd shots that can take up to 100MB of memory each.'"

78 of 324 comments (clear)

  1. Hm ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, his method of choosing one vendor's product line over another certainly is efficient. Just go with your "gut feeling" and buy whatever your feelings tell you.

    Whether you end up with the best tool for the job is another story.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Hm ... by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Efficient is the key word here.

      He's probably aware that anything he'd choose is adequate for the job that he'd put it to, and he's probably right that just choosing one and saving a few tens of thousands of dollars of meeting, ordering, installing, and evaluation time is plenty better than trying to find one that will increase their total efficiency by that much.

    2. Re:Hm ... by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know... I think that "gut feeling" was actually caused by a noise 92 cents below the lowest octave of E-flat.

    3. Re:Hm ... by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just go with your "gut feeling" and buy whatever your feelings tell you.

      Are you sure it comes from your gut?

      I think that special feeling might come from the cockles of our hearts, or maybe below the cockles, maybe in the sub-cockle area, maybe in the liver, maybe in the kidneys, maybe even in the colon. We don't know.

      Don't jump to conclusions that these feelings come from the gut. My colon tells me you could be wrong.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
  2. I figured maybe.. by twocoasttb · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Cartman roshamboed someone for it.

  3. They took jer job by rolandog · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that their providers of DL Tape are probably saying "They took mah job!"

  4. Full quote... WTF? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Franzen said he chose Apple hardware based on a "gut" feeling that its technology would be good, and so far, he has not been disappointed."

    Bad, bad Franzen. Must be nice to have money to burn, but "gut feeling" is a very, very poor way to select hardware... although this is a good example of brand awareness and marketing in action.

    OTOH, it must be nice to have a job where you can make purchasing decisions based on a gut feeling, I normally have to justify every purchase three times in three different ways to three different execs... just like they send out procedural memos.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Full quote... WTF? by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Must be nice to have money to burn, but "gut feeling" is a very, very poor way to select hardware.

      Well, we purchased 35 Xserve RAID arrays for a single installation, for a total of 200TB of storage, after real research and comparisons as opposed to a gut feeling.

      The installation is described here, with pictures. It is NOT a University-wide service; this was installed for one research project. We have much more storage around campus from EMC (in our two primary datacenters), Apple, Sun, and Storagetek, among others.

      It has been up and running for almost a year now, and the only problem, across all 35 Xserve RAID units running 24x7, has been one failed disk. One alternative looked at was building whitebox PCs in huge tower cases and packing them with disk. Ultimately, it was decided that a major commercial vendor, from which 24x7 support and 4-hour on-site response is available for 3 years, was a good choice. And it was much cheaper than competitive commercial solutions. And at a cost of around $1.60/GB for enterprise storage, you can't really go wrong. And for the Mac OS X-haters out there, there is no Mac OS X as part of this solution. We are using commodity 1U servers running Fedora Core. The Linux boxes see it as generic fibre channel disk, because that's all it is. The servers are monitored with Apple's excellent Java-based, platform independent RAID Admin tools, and some command-line tools we wrote ourselves.

      It's proven itself to be rock-solid. And that matches with my experience with the 20 Xserve servers we have installed, starting since around mid-2002: zero hardware failures, of any kind. Franzen had a good gut feeling. And, of course, given Apple's track record with reliability and lack of need for repairs (generally number one) when compared with other vendors from organizations such as Consumer Reports, guessing that the reliability of another Apple product will be good is probably a reasonable guess. ;-)

    2. Re:Full quote... WTF? by samkass · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Poor performance, but awsome tech support and familiar interface."

      While the performance of MacOS X as a MySQL server was well-documented by Anandtech to be sub-par, I haven't seen any benchmarks showing any performance problems with the xRAID/xServe combination as a file server. And last I checked, it was extremely competitive on a dollar-per-GB basis for the claimed performance and reliability levels. If they just need something to store lots of files online, and have it be easy to administer, it doesn't seem like a bad deal.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    3. Re:Full quote... WTF? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need... to change... my pants...

    4. Re:Full quote... WTF? by Halo1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would surprise me if they didn't, given the Windows, Red Hat, Novell and Terra Soft certifications they boast about on their website.

      --
      Donate free food here
    5. Re:Full quote... WTF? by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does Apple still support this when you're not running Mac OS X?

      Yes, they do. Support, though the project hasn't needed it, is one of the main reasons we got it.

      With AppleCare Premium, 24x7 telephone and email support is included, as well as 24x7 4-hour on-site hardware service. Apple supports it as fibre channel storage, and they don't care what it's attached to. See also Apple's non-Mac OS X certifications for Xserve RAID. No, it doesn't include Fedora Core, but they still support the product itself.

  5. Overheard at SP productions when hw came in by FerretFrottage · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sweeeeeeeet, but you get your bitch ass back in the kitchen and make me some pie!

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    1. Re:Overheard at SP productions when hw came in by WorldRimWalker · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
      The fat white guy's name is Michael Moore.
  6. respect my vector by hostingreviews · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dear Trey or Matt: Switch to vector graphics methods, not raster! Save many disks of whatever. Kthnksbi.

    1. Re:respect my vector by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why do that? You'd lose all the things that makes South Park look the way it does - paper textures, realistic shadows, and so on...

      It's much better that they do the show in Maya. Not only do you get the photorealistic rendering that gives it that low-tech "animation stand" look, you get Maya's great animation and scripting tools, which make the animators and tech directors happy.

    2. Re:respect my vector by quantax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They aren't doing Southpark in 3D for the realistic shadows or paper textures, they're using Maya since it allows them much more freedom in the long run with the characters and animation, the very reason they would not use flash or any other 2D program. Character animation in Maya is great & intuitive, especially with animation as simple as Southparks, so they have all their characters in 3D which can be place in any position, any perspective, etc within their scenes. When a character turns around in the show, the animators have keyframed the characters poses, and instead of having to have an artist draw a cell of animation for each perspective of the character (front, rear, side, etc etc etc), they just turn them around in 3D, flatten the animation curves to give it that instant-motion look and they gotta working scene. A majority of their work is very likely the character animations, scene creation, lip-sync and post-render touch up to remove anything that might not have rendered the way they like.

      If they used a 2D program, they would be spending more time dealing with the technical aspect of animation rather than just moving the characters around and putting them where they want them. This is not because 3D is better but simply because it is far more efficient and allows them more flexibility. As far as the paper-look, thats simply a matter of the render engine & post-render effects, nothing that couldn't be done with a 2D program either, but does take a decent amount of time to get looking good, atleast to the degree that post-render touchup will not take much time.

      I would not be surprised if most cartoons in the future moved to 3D since the time-savings can really add up if you get a good setup going, and most cartoons animation movement quality is low to begin with so they can save themselves money on all aspects of it from time saved in the character animation phase.

      --
      "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    3. Re:respect my vector by tinrobot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When a character turns around in the show, the animators have keyframed the characters poses, so they have all their characters in 3D which can be place in any position, any perspective, etc within their scenes.

      You know absolutely nothing about how South Park is set up. It is done in a 3D package, but the characters are by no means "3D" in the traditional sense -- they are simply flat parts assembled in 3D space, much like the Oxberry camera stand used for the original shorts.

      Characters are built "flat" using NURBS curves and surfaced using the "make planar" function, which trims a plane to the outline of the curve. The characters are simply an assemblage flat bits of geometry - the digital equivalent of a cutout bit of paper. These flat bits are textured using scans of actual construction paper.

      Animation is done using set driven keys on the visibility tracks of these parts. These keys are tied to the action of a software slider. Running the head turn slider, for example, would turn off visibility on the "right" head and turn it on for the "front" head (I'm simplifying here, but you get the point)

      The original decision in 1997 to go with Alias Power Animator 7 was because of the ability to render accurate textures and shadows, as well as the ability to tie sliders to visibility. Back then the sliders were driven by expressions, but Maya allowed the switch to set driven keys, which are more eficient. Flash really wasn't an option back then but 2D software such as After Effects actually were considered - AE could do the textures, but shadows were difficult as were sliders. Thus the decision to go with a 3D package to essentially do a 2D show.

      (If you haven't figured it out - I used to work there)

    4. Re:respect my vector by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, have you actually ever used Maya? Or any digital video software?

      Actually, I just wrote a book on Maya (which isn't video software, btw...) and I own several seats of it.

  7. The Simpsons animates in real time for broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Despite the terrible strain on the animator's wrists.

  8. Re:What does Simpsons use? by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seeing as though The Simpsons are still drawn by hand, I would imagine "storage needs" involves warehouse space in addition to digital storage.

  9. this is news? by ilmdba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    so they dumped some DLT drives and a ciprico array for some LTO drives and some xserves?

    wow.

    this is news how??

  10. "South park compression" by Entropy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bet they sure could save tons of HD space if they just had one clip of Kenny's death.

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  11. Why so huge? by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't South Park done in flash? I know a lot of Adult Swim is done in flash...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Why so huge? by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. It's Maya.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Why so huge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      First time I saw the show, I figured it was PowerPoint.

    3. Re:Why so huge? by EvanED · · Score: 3, Funny

      LaTeX + Beamer

    4. Re:Why so huge? by poopdeville · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  12. Re:Why? by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, why are you bothering to comment? You're just cluttering things up.

    It's like those kids on "Ain't It Cool News" constantly bitching about how lame the articles are, how much of a sellout Harry Knowles is, and how everyone there should get out of their basements. Without the slightest sense of irony.

    Why not just post on an article you do care about?

  13. Why choose Xserve? by nystagman · · Score: 3, Funny

    One word: Hellastorage

    --
    Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
  14. As long as... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just don't name your machine "kenny." It's not good to have it crash every episode - even if you can reboot it.

  15. Gut check! by version5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you think about it, maybe there are a few missing pieces to the rationale for choosing Apple hardware. But doesn't it feel like the right thing...right here in the gut? Because that's where the truth comes from, ladies and gentlemen...the gut.

    Did you know that you have more nerve endings in your stomach than in your head? Look it up. Now, somebody's gonna say `I did look that up and its wrong'. Well, Mister, that's because you looked it up in a book. Next time, try looking it up in your gut. I did. And my gut tells me that's how our nervous system works.

    Now I know some of you may not trust your gut...yet. But with my help you will. The "truthiness" is, anyone can make IT decisions. I promise to feel IT decisions!

    --

    "It's Dot Com!"

  16. I've Got To Wonder.. by mpapet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What, exactly takes 100mb about a background shown at 72ppi and 800x600?

    GIMP tells me that's about 2mb.

    I've got to try that "gut feeling" in a meeting with my clients sometime real soon.

    Client: "So, why exactly should we install PKI infrastructure?"
    Me: "I've got a gut feeling that you need it"

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:I've Got To Wonder.. by kv9 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What, exactly takes 100mb about a background shown at 72ppi and 800x600?

      the many layers?

    2. Re:I've Got To Wonder.. by SynapseLapse · · Score: 3, Informative

      True the image itself is only 2mb, but they render the show in Maya. So Scripts+models+textures+scenes=100mb.

    3. Re:I've Got To Wonder.. by Crizp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What, exactly takes 100mb about a background shown at 72ppi and 800x600?


      Because it's most likely not 800x600, but rather 4096x4096 just in case they would want to zoom in on something having the texture. Also, bear in mind that many of the backgrounds are probably still there from "Bigger, Longer, Uncut" movie and many others are probably made for possible future use in a new feature film. Rendering for the silver screen takes a bit higher res than 800x600...
    4. Re:I've Got To Wonder.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What, exactly takes 100mb about a background shown at 72ppi and 800x600?

      Surely you jest, it takes a lot more than 100 millibits to make a background.

      ppi has nothing to do with the final file size if you've already set the raster size.

      Seriously, the article says "up to". If you have a crowd of a lot of people, with several layers being buildings, trees, mountains, sky and clouds, that can add up to a lot.

    5. Re:I've Got To Wonder.. by forkazoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What, exactly takes 100mb about a background shown at 72ppi and 800x600?

      GIMP tells me that's about 2mb.

      The biggest issue that results in needing more space than your calculations would imply is the fact that you just picked numbers out of your ass with no basis in reality. First off, the 72ppi is non-sensical in this context, has no meaning, and doesn't effect the file size. Second, they have the backgrounds done in a much higher resolution than 800x600.

      You see, they do the backgrounds as large pieces that they can zoom in on. This allows them to do things like a shot where they are walking along the road, with the road scrolling past. Background plates are also often many layers. This allows a simulated parallax effect while the scrolling is taking place. So, while an actual NTSC frame is only 720x486 maximum, there is no reason that the size of the background plates would be restricted to this resolution.
  17. ...and in response Steve Jobs stated by dickeya · · Score: 3, Funny

    RESPECT MY AUTHORITAY!!!!

  18. They're not even very interesting by tap · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their old system was a DLT7000 tape drive. I used one of these for backup around five years ago. They hold 35GB uncompressed per tape and have a trasfer speed of 5 MB/sec. Think about trying to backup a 350 GB drive on one of these things. DLT7000 was replaced by LTO-1 and SDLT about four plus years ago. These systems get 100 GB on a tape. I guess they skipped that generation and went to LTO-2, 200 GB on a tape.

    Last time I was buying this stuff, a 24 tape auto-loader was around $15,000 and the tapes were $50 each. That's only about 6 terrabytes before you have to manually change tapes. If you look at how much it costs to build a multi-terrabyte NAS server with 250GB+ SATA drives (way less), and how much faster and easier to deal with it is, you have to wonder what the point of tape is nowdays.

    Of course the South Park people's data isn't very big at all. They've only got two terra-bytes to deal with! That's nothing by today's standards. I built a system five times that size two years ago. For less than they paid for the Apple Xservers today too.

  19. Re:For those of us who are ignorant by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    it kills kenny faster and more efficiently.

  20. 15TB of Xserve RAID storage? What about 200TB? by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is 15TB of storage news? (And they don't even the full 15TB yet!)

    What about the 200TB of Xserve RAID storage for a single project at the University of Wisconsin, which has been up and running for over half a year?

    And no, this isn't a project serving a whole campus or an entire university student body. This is one single research project operated by one entity. Oh well, I guess supporting the Large Hadron Collider isn't as cool as South Park. ;-)

    1. Re:15TB of Xserve RAID storage? What about 200TB? by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why is 15TB of storage news?

      Once they dupe the story 7 times they will be able to handle 200TB.

    2. Re:15TB of Xserve RAID storage? What about 200TB? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I guess supporting the Large Hadron Collider isn't as cool as South Park. ;-)

      Are you kidding? The south park guys would love the Large Hardon Collider.

      erm, what?

  21. why this is important by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only Apple servers will do the job when the South Park guys decide it's time to play "kick the server."

  22. Re:What does Simpsons use? by eargang · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uhmm... dude. You know that it's not Groenig that's stopping the show, right? Creators are usually not in full control of their creations. Also, your post is way funnier when read in Fry's voice in my head. You kind of sound like him.

  23. Re:For those of us who are ignorant by deReuter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it is rather interesting of you to mention apple hardware over other platforms, but the interesting part of the article is this statment following.

    "J.J. Franzen, technology supervisor at South Park Studios in Los Angeles, says he chose Apple hardware based on a 'gut' feeling"

    Gut feeling huh, that is an interesting way of making a tecnology choice!!!!!!

  24. Interview with JJ Franzen by datafr0g · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.southparkstudios.com/behind/interviews. php?tab=20#3

    Interesting stuff - has some background technical info on how an episode is put together and what systems they use to do it all.

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  25. Re:Who cares? by slashdotnickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this wasn't South Park, nobody would care.
    Yes, hence why it's on Slashdot... us nerds like the show and like to hear stuff about it. It's called entertainment, but if you'd prefer boring, humorless technology reports 24/7 might I recommend this site.

  26. Re:For those of us who are ignorant by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those of us who are ignorant and don't see why someone would use Apple hardware over good commodity stuff, what's the advantage in going with Xserve stuff?

    Well, the Xserve stuff is cheaper.

    Or, did you mean "commodity" as in "I got my 13 year old cousin to build something from parts he bought online?" Yeah, people who put any value on their data and time don't simply don't do that.

  27. Re:For those of us who are ignorant by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those of us who are ignorant and don't see why someone would use Apple hardware over good commodity stuff, what's the advantage in going with Xserve stuff?

    You plug it in and it works.

    It's sort of like the underpants gnomes, except there is no step 3.

  28. Re:The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    WHO GIVES A FUCK?!

    Quit making slashdot so god damn gimmicky.

  29. Tapes can be moved to a secure location, by winkydink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    which is kind of hard to do with a multi-terabyte NAS. For quick backups, nothing beats disk, but for archival storage, I'll stick with tape. Kind of hard to restore your environment when the building holding the NAS has been destroyed by some natural disaster.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  30. Re:What does Simpsons use? by santaliqueur · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Simpsons are great..."

    great is ok...but amazing would be great.

    --
    I do not accept czechs.
  31. Re:What does Simpsons use? by ChadN · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Simpsons is now an all digital production, according to the DVD commentary. It may involve "hand drawing", but that either means hand drawing immediately scanned into a computer (for cleanup and coloring), or drawing on a tablet, etc. that goes directly into a computer. I don't know what software is used, but I haven't searched either.

    --
    "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  32. /.ers' thoughts on "Bloody Mary" being pulled? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know this is off-topic, but most of the discussion so far has been pretty uninteresting, so I was wondering how other slashdotters feel about the "Blood Mary" episode of South Park being pulled off the air and basically being censored from TV or any other future reproductions because it offended a few religious conservatives.

    Here's another news article on it featured in the North Korea Times.

  33. On the next episode... by SamMichaels · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure we'll see everyone with ipods, using itunes on ibooks, a new Apple tree infront of the school and a crooked Macintosh logo bumper sticker on the school bus.

    Nothing like trade :)

  34. Re:Spelling Nazi warning by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 3, Funny

    So the Xserve RAID disk arrays flatter the linear tape setup with words of admiration? (I think they meant to say "complemented").

    I'm not so sure. Apple's are supposed to be user-friendly, right?

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  35. Re:My gut feeling tells me that... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
    My gut feeling tells me that you're an idiot.

    There, see? Sometimes it works.

  36. Re:Who cares? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If this wasn't South Park, nobody would care. Is it really news that they are using a new technology?

    It's news because South Park is pushing certain limits much farther than anyone else, and so it is useful to know what technology they use. Think back to shortly after The Simpsons became a hit, and then every other network tried to jump in with animated prime-time shows, and pretty much all failed. This is discussed on one of The Simpsons DVD commentaries, and Matt Groening and the others explain what these other shows did wrong. The big thing was trying to use too few people. These other shows would hire one or two big name writers, and expect them to write a whole season. On The Simpsons, on the other hand, they had a dozen writers, with most writers only working on one episode for a season. They had many directors, with each directory only responsible for an episode or two. So, it is not surprising that these other shows sucked...how can one or two writers and one or two directors produce year after year (or even one year) of quality on a weekly TV series?

    But look at South Park. They do all the things that for those other shows were fatal mistakes. Most episodes are written by Trey Parker, or Trey Parker and Matt Stone, or by those two and Pam Brady. And besides writing, Parker and Stone direct. They write original music, and perform it. And they do a large number of the voices.

    And on top of that, they do it on an insane schedule, sometimes not finishing a script until days before the episode must air.

    Yet, it works. They produce a great show.

    To do this requires very good technology. They aren't sending stuff off to Korea, to come back weeks or months later. They've got deadlines much tighter than any other animated series, and so they need technology that is very fast and very reliable, much more so than any other series needs.

  37. Computer ink and paint only. by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Informative

    The characters are still drawn and animated in pencil.

    Film Roman here in LA does design/boards/layout, while several studios in Korea do the actual animation as well as the digital ink/paint.

  38. Sweeeeeet! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Funny

    God damn it, tape drive! Thats a BAD tape drive! That's MY SAN! Mom!

  39. There's actually some interesting infor here... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From a Storage Admin's perspective, they've got a pretty old infrastructure and they are moving to a newer, faster more flexible setup... smart move.

    They started out with DLT7000, which I don't think you can buy anymore, but those drives could only backup about 32MB/s with compression. Compare that with a modern day LTO-3 drive which can backup 80MB/s WITHOUT compression. Even if they just installed 3year old 1Gb/s FibreChannel HBAs, and upgraded the tape drives, they would have had a better set up. Hopefully they upgraded their backup servers otherwise they'll hit bottlenecks just trying to drive faster tape and disk.

    Even though they went with a Xserve based upon a 'gut feeling', the Xserve, while not the greatest array out there (even in the midrange/low end segment), I've seen worse.

    I think the bigger news in the article is that they kicked out Legato. For a small shop like this, Legato might be over kill.

    Good to see they are upgrading with the times.

  40. Obligatory UG reference by .DS_Store · · Score: 2, Funny

    Phase 1: Upgrade storage hardware.
    Phase 2: ???
    Phase 3: Profit!

  41. 2MB per frame by Brendor · · Score: 2, Informative
    NTSC video is 720px x 486px at 29.997 frames per second. 2 seconds of video is close to 100MB

    He is also probably talking about assets pre rendering. Every character has textures associated with it, and the geometry, while not that huge, adds up.

  42. South Park == New television business model by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    South Park, for whatever bashing it takes as infantile potty humor mixed in with occasional Left wing / Right wing issues, has set a new standard for cable TV shows. An average episode costs less than $100,000 USD (not counting whatever deals Creators Parker and Stone have with Comedy Central) and can go from concept to final print in two weeks. Throw in it's high ratings with the 18-35 crowd, and in one 30 second commercial spot, you the parent company have just recouped your initial investment.

    Adult swim has taken this sort of guerilla approach, picking up cheap, quick turn around projects. There's no huge capital outlay (unless you're buying an old fox show that was a failure and will probably never see the light of day again.....) and even if it fails, you can drop something fresh into it's slot in no time.

    I wonder if the business plan ripoff has contributed to the Viacom / AS fued? Or if viacom just can't remove their heads from thier asses...

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  43. Re:What does Simpsons use? by AndreiK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, it takes a whole 30 gigs on my computer.

  44. XServe RAIDs by Bobartig · · Score: 3, Informative

    What should be said is that it is NOT PowerPC hardware, there are NO G5's in them, and they don't run OSX. They're a sleek chassis full of RAID hardware, fiber channel connectivity, and 7 independant SATA controllers each with 2 hot swappable drives. Price/GB compared to rival products is extremely competitive, as in worlds cheaper. With 2x 512MB caches and dual fibrechannel connectivity, performance is pretty amazing with a full compliment of drives. The RAID servers are certified to work with Novell, Oracle, Windows Server, MacOSX, RedHat, YellowDog, Emulex, Cisco, ATTO, ADIC, etc. etc. etc. They still need some method of administering it (its just the storage), which may be an XServe, or virtually any other modern computer.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  45. Being this is 'South Park' by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... insert obligitory 1, 2, 3, Profit! statement here.

    --
    - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
  46. Re:What does Simpsons use? by ManOfMidnight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though I am missing the last few seasons from my DVD collection, what I've heard from the commentary thus far is that they are the only remaining, currently airing, hand-painted cell animation series out there (or something to that extent). I would assume that any digital intervention in the production process would be scanning each cell into a digital format for easier and faster clean-up and editing.

    --
    A proud provider of services through the Microsoft Reboot Engineer Certification since 1997!
  47. Re:For those of us who are ignorant by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're missing something: A warranty and support contract.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  48. Re:For those of us who are ignorant by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is Slashdot, where people think Linux on a Xbox is a solution for something.

    Many here will never understand why people buy stuff from actual companies, and things they just pull out of a box and turn on and go on with their life at that.

  49. Re:Who cares? by PapayaSF · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They've got deadlines much tighter than any other animated series
    No kidding! The episode in which they pulled Saddam out of his "spiderhole" was aired, as I recall, about 70 hours after the actual event. That's pretty much instant replay in the animation world.
    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  50. Re:Apples hardware? by tfb · · Score: 3, Informative
    Almost no storage system vendors make hard drives. Many of them probably don't actually make anything in terms of hardware. What they `make' is several things which turn out to be a good deal more important than hardware:
    • a system which has actually been properly designed in terms of performance, scalability and so on;
    • a system which they will support, so you don't have to grovel around finding a replacement for some disk that has died and which turns out to not be a current part any more;
    • a system which isn't designed by some spotty teenager who (a) will have no idea about the above two issues, and (b) will then leave or (worse) have some kind of tantrum and refuse to support it any more.

    If your data is worth anything at all, and you are not in the commercially unusual position of being able to do your own system and support it etc (I'm ruling out google here, right) yourself, then it is very unlikely that the spotty-teen approach is better than the storage-system-vendor one, despite the latter having a higher up-front cost and being less fashionable on slashdot. Whether Apple are such a vendor I don't know: I guess they'd like to be.
  51. Re:The Simpsons animates in real time for broadcas by Kankraka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually that was Futurama, as seen in 2ACV16 - Anthology of Interest I's opening sequence. "Painstakenly Drawn Before a Live Audience."

  52. MOD PARENT UP by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is an explanation of the "brown noise" that makes you crap your pants when you hear it.

    Such subtle, arcane humor. I love it!

  53. Yeah, but Cartman takes up most of that space by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Okay, I couldn't resist.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  54. US Too by KMTechGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The animation company I work for, Animation Collective, uses a similar setup. We have Apple Xserve G5s and XRaids. It is ridiculous the amount of data that we deal with. The raids constantly fill up. We just upgraded to the 7 TB XRaid, which I hope holds out for a while.

    We are coming close to releasing a new production called Kappa Mikey. It is Nickelodeon's first ever global program acquisition.

    One of our animators just posted an entry on the company blog. Check it out www.kappamikey.com/blog