Slashdot Mirror


Unisys Gets DHS Contract Worth Up to $750 million

feamsr00 writes "In an affirmation of its business relationship with Unisys Corp., the Department of Homeland Security awarded the Blue Bell firm a "bridge" contract worth up to $750 million. Some controversy erupted in the fall after it was reported that the government was auditing a Unisys contract because the company had possibly overbilled the Transportation Security Administration by as much as 171,000 hours of labor and overtime. TSA is a division of the Homeland Security department. Unisys is also to upgrade the Department of Homeland Security's headquarters facility in Washington."

28 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Thank God for the Government's Incompetence ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the only thing preventing our complete loss of freedoms.

  2. pardon me? by Combas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Man I wish I was in security right now.

    I just find it amazing how security experts are getting paid such big bucks yet according to recent audits show they arent really making things all that much safer.

    1. Re:pardon me? by biocute · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't have to make things much safer, they only have to make people feel that things are much safer now.

    2. Re:pardon me? by SilverspurG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't be so certain the experts are getting paid big bucks. It's likely the vast majority of this money will be lost in planning, overhead, and infrastructure--the CEO, the VPs, and the executive board. If any jobs are created for it there will be two middle managers and six entry level desk clerks. That's what $750 million buys for the taxpayers.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    3. Re:pardon me? by ClamIAm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because they're getting tons of contracts doesn't mean their suggestions are being put into production. I'm sure more than one security expert has said "get rid of this app" or recommended some better method, and then was either refused or the idea was abandoned after two weeks because it was "too hard".

    4. Re:pardon me? by university+chica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work for TSA. We really don't get paid that well, and our overtime and staffing have been cut drastically. Maybe if we weren't understaffed by almost 30% of our federally allotted screeners and prohibited from doing overtime, security would be better.

  3. that's great. by User+956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It makes me feel much better, considering they cut the CyberSecurity budget to $16 million.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:that's great. by aywwts4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dont worry, once you see the heaps of giant flatscreen monitors and really cool custom "Terrortracking" GUIs just flashing random information on the screens faster than anyone could processs the information you will feel much safer. Oh and its all going to make cool Beeps and Boops, alienware is supplying the cases, and Dont let me forget to mention the tinted glass walls everywhere and blue and red gelled accent lighting, oh, and the lasers!

      I mean, atleast, if its anything like TV.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    2. Re:that's great. by ActMatrix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the article more closely, the RESEARCH budget got cut to $16 million. This has been misquoted or misunderstood by countless Slashdot posters. As a security consultant in the DC metro area, I can assure you that DHS spends far more than $16 million on IT security.

    3. Re:that's great. by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, it's not just TV. I had a client that built an ops center pretty much like that to impress federal clients. They had a nice conference room that featured a huge window with power driven blinds that can raised dramatically at the push of the button to reveal the ops center with its rows of computers and large projection screen.

      None of this was necesssary in the least. They could have operated without an ops center and with a projector in the conference room. In fact Ops wasn't used on a regular basis; when they had a VIP they roped in a bunch of employees, making sure they had their official uniform shirts on, and made them sit in Ops. Now that they have landed a number of contacts, they're looking to sell their white elephant offices and move to cheaper digs.

      The lesson: if you dont' know what you're doing, you'd better look like you know what you're doing. If you really don't know what you're doing, then hire somebody who looks like they do.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. I work for Unisys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.

    Reading a story about 'us' overbilling, generally being corrupt is a bit of a non event. Breaks my fucking heart to see some of the shit that goes on with middle and upper management, coming into the office every day means giving up a bit (read: a lot) of self respect, unfortunately I've got bills to pay :(

    1. Re:I work for Unisys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would I bother with lies? There's nothing for me to gain by spinning bullshit to anybody.

      I work for Unisys, they're a pack of assholes. We sell expensive services to PHB's and effectively do very little. Front line workers are treated like imbeciles, customers are milked more than I thought could have been possible.

      Management is little short of insulting, the day I recieved training manuals on "How to ensure you're not dealing with a terrorist organisation", was the day I started looking elsewhere for income. A company like this wasting money feeding the ol' terror machine is something I just don't want to be a part of anymore.

      A lot of the time a problem arises, there's more discussion on how to avoid fixing it, or making it an "out of scope" issue than there is discussion on how to fix the problem and avoid it in the future.

      Believe what you like, but maybe somebody will read this and look elsewhere for an outsourcing solution, maybe they won't. Clearly that won't have any impact on you.

  5. DHS Windows upgrade by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Funny
    Unisys is also to upgrade the Department of Homeland Security's headquarters facility in Washington.

    WMF patch rollout Tuesday.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  6. Unisys! Ah, the memories.... by imperious_rex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's nice to know Unisys's heart-warming corporate culture hasn't changed over the past few years. Ah yes, I remember well the days of the great GIF Patent Shakedown indeed! Bastards.

  7. I wonder by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny
    the Department of Homeland Security awarded the Blue Bell firm a "bridge" contract worth up to $750 million

    Does this "bridge" contract involve the sale of a bridge somewhere in New York City to someone?

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  8. Hell of an ROI by cprincipe · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --

    bun-fhuinneog agam!

  9. Cronyism is the end result of democracy by dada21 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When 3 people give up rights to 1 person, it is pretty easy control. When we have just 800 nationally elected officials handling the rights of 300 million, what do you expect? That is 375,000:1 ratio or so (counting underage too).

    Here's the root of the problem: abuse of Constitutional authorized power combined with what is NOT voter apathy but citizen time value. A billion dollars is only $1 per day per citizen: you and I are not going to fight tooth and nail to get rid of a billion dollar contract. Yet a small group of 5 CxO's from Unisys will. Money is not the problem, the corrupt political structure of the federal government is.

    Voting is not going to change the structure: those 5 CxO's will happily work with whoever is in power. We've already given UP those powers, there is no taken them back.

    If you want to see changes, do it with your life as I did. Take your money out of the stock market and 401Ks and put it into your own business or local businesses you have control of (and actually profit from!). Take your money out of the bank and pay off all your debt -- whatever is left over is perfectly safe in gold or silver. Talk to your employer and see if you can become a contractor and find ways to write-off as much as possible under the tax code. Don't take loans, don't have a credit card, don't be concerned with social security and medicare. You can do it on your own, and you can stop supporting the monsters in office.

    Unisys is not the bad guy here: they are taking advantage of the system the voters put in place.

  10. Re:A more corrupt version of IBM by doubtless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I worked for Unisys about 4 years ago, they had 32 way xeon machines. They were the company that provided the biggest windows server, OEM to HP too. Not that I'm saying it's necessarily a great product, but do give them some credits.

    --
    geek page at KY speaks
  11. Overbill ?! of course !! by Gates82 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I work for Unisys, worst job I have ever had. I was working for IBM. IBM lost the service contract and I ended up working for Unisys.

    Unisys is one of the most unethical companies I have done business with. What can you expect though, our major contract is with Dell. So Dell is awarded a contract and then Unisys fullfills the service end of that agreement. So not only do I work for an awful company I get to deal with crappy Dell hardware, and a Dell Helpless desk (as the customers on my site have come to call them).

    It is no surprise that Unisys overbilled the TSA. We are constantly told to put time on both our tickets and another accounting method. In effect this often double bills our customer or increases the time that we put on calls. In an eight hour day I have often done 15-20 hours worth of work. I often work reimaging one or two systems an complete other calls, but on a busy day a may really only perform 10-12 hours worth of work in 8 hours.

    I am currently looking for a new job. I try to be as honest as I can and still follow this screwed up system. Although when a company chooses the lowest bidder they do get what they pay for. And the Dells and Unisyses of the industry are going to make the profit margin by cheating their customers. It's a good thing I like the company that I support.

    If anyone has a desktop position open in Phoenix, AZ check out my resume

    --
    So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's Sister?

    1. Re:Overbill ?! of course !! by ztransform · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, I looked at your resume, and may I offer you some helpful hints. 1. What did you do at university for a year before you moved to a different uni to study civil engineering? 2. Do you think adding your religious affiliations will assist you in landing a job? 3. Whilst you may have an ethical issue with Unisys (I have ethical issues with several companies myself) it probably isn't wise to be broadcasting your distaste with a company while working there AND hoping someone reads your CV. The question any employer will ask is "will you diss our company while working for us?".. better that you quit in clear conscious and then look for a new job. 4. Is six sigma white belt going to mean anything..? Perhaps eliminate from your CV all those things you started and didn't get more than 25% of the way through (such as six sigma training, a year at uni).. leaving those things in will not inspire an employer who would want you to be completing what you start.

  12. Their Clearpath (mainframe) servers are nice, IMO. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2

    They come in two flavors, the OS2200 line (which is the descendant of the Sperry UNIVAC 1100-series), and the MCP line (which is the descendant of the Burroughs B-series and A-series). Nice boxes for those who need that kind of high-end legacy technology (airlines, banks, insurance companies, etc.).

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  13. Idiot by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to see changes, do it with your life as I did. Take your money out of the stock market and 401KsIf you are stupid enough to follow his advice you deserve what you get. While I agree that social security and medicare will not be there for me (I am 23) despite the fact I pay into these programs, not having investments for your future beyond retirement is idiotic. Gold is not the answer. If you don't trust stocks, invest your 401k's in bonds (and lose out on returns... but have the warm fuzzies knowing you didn't take a risk). I have my finances worked out such that I will be able to retire early and live off the interest, minus inflation - leaving an estate to donate as I see fit and money to pass on to my children when I feel they are ready upon my death.

    (and actually profit from!).I profited well off of my 401k's and stocks. The lifetime trend of the stock market is about 9% a year. (8 years to double your money on an across-the-board distribution, better if you invest wisely.) You can't do much better than that. Small companies are hit and miss. Hit and do a lot better, miss and lose it all. (Not to mention harder to get your money out if an emergency comes up)

    Talk to your employer and see if you can become a contractor and find ways to write-off as much as possible under the tax code.

    Learn the tax code - there are a lot of things you can do to write off taxes without being a contractor if that isn't an option.

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Idiot by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you are stupid enough to follow his advice you deserve what you get.

      Correct. True wealth without initiating force against anyone else.

      not having investments for your future beyond retirement is idiotic.

      I have investments and I recommend everyone invest in their own businesses or the businesses of those they know and trust. My investments make between 20% and 50% a year on average -- as a profit payment (dividend). I still have growing equity above and beyond.

      If you don't trust stocks, invest your 401k's in bonds (and lose out on returns... but have the warm fuzzies knowing you didn't take a risk).

      Bonds have never kept up with the true cost of living increase. Prices go up because of currency inflation by the central banks -- in a free market prices go down because the money supply is fixed. I would never invest in bonds, they're the true suckers' investment.

      I have my finances worked out such that I will be able to retire early and live off the interest, minus inflation - leaving an estate to donate as I see fit and money to pass on to my children when I feel they are ready upon my death.

      If you trust the government to keep the dollar solid. I don't. If I'm wrong, the worst that happens is what? My gold is worthless? I don't see that happening, as gold has been relatively stable for thousands of years. If you're wrong, what can happen? Massive debt, worthless stocks and no savings.

      I profited well off of my 401k's and stocks. The lifetime trend of the stock market is about 9% a year.

      No, you don't. You profit off of buying a stock at a sucker's price, never earning a dividend (which is true profit of the company) and hoping you can sell it off to some sucker at a higher sucker's price. Even factoring in the money you're "profiting" in, you're barely keeping up with true consumer inflation! 9% annually? The Federal Reserve is currently printing 10-15% inflationary dollars annually, which will eventually cause prices to rise by that figure once the dollars return to the common market. My investments in local businesses offer me a TRUE profit plus the increase in share prices. Your investments offer you no dividend, right?

      You can't do much better than that. Small companies are hit and miss. Hit and do a lot better, miss and lose it all. (Not to mention harder to get your money out if an emergency comes up)

      I lose on 1 out of 10 companies, usually my entire investment. On the 9 out of 10 that don't fail, I make 20-50% annually. I double my money as a profit in 2-4 years, and I still own the company. Even factoring in the 100% loss on the failed investments, I double my money in approximately 5.5 years and I still retain control. Anyone can do this, and it doesn't require a stock broker who is making money on you if you win or if you lose.

      On top of all that, the stock market is experiencing what the Austrians have been talking about for 2 decades: an increased valuation due to the easy credit and currency counterfeiting of the central bank. Greenspan prints new money and sends it out at 1-4% interest. The lemmings get this money as increased wages and easy loans. The lemming sees this money at 4% can make him 9% in the market, so he invests there. Millions of other lemmings do the same, causing a supply shortage based on the increased demand that the Federal Reserve created -- causing the stock prices to go up. Artificial price increase.

      Then the market crashes, so the Board drops interest rates lower and counterfeits more new money (legally). This gives the lemmings even more money at a lower interest rate, and what do they see now? Houses are going up 10% annually! Said lemmings then invest in the housing markets, hoping to be the "flip it!" millionaire by 40. Except houses are depreciating assets, just like cars and clothes and food. Houses need maintenance, new houses replace old ones -- houses go down in price in a free market. Why did our hous

    2. Re:Idiot by everphilski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you trust the government to keep the dollar solid. I don't. If I'm wrong, the worst that happens is what? My gold is worthless? I don't see that happening, as gold has been relatively stable for thousands of years. If you're wrong, what can happen? Massive debt, worthless stocks and no savings

      You can invest internationally on a 401k. Its called diversification. My 401k did better than 9% and I sleep very well at night. Some of my funds did 40+% last year.

      Sure, if you want to earn $15-$25 per hour. Even the worst contractor can charge $80+ per hour.

      (Not an option in my industry, but anywayas...) My first job fresh out of college I was making $25.00 an hour. With about the best benefits you can find. I'm not sure $80 an hour could make up for those benefits. Not to mention my employer matching my 401k contributions, profit sharing and safe harbor contributions... we are talking 7.5-10k a year right there in tax-free "free" money you would not have as a contractor. Its not dollars you make per hour, its how much money I have in investments when I retire. And retire young. I don't plan having to work past 50. If I work past 50, I'm working because I want to, not because I have to. And in the mean time, I am living modestly but I have about the best benefits a guy and his wife and kids could ask for. Which is money in the bank cause when my son gets sick I take him to the hospital without thinking twice. $20 copay? Who cares. Its pretax anyway with the company cafateria plan.

      Gold is a poor investment, but then again you already have a few slashbots telling you that. Anything more than a couple percent in gold is just too much.

      -everphilski-

  14. wink wink nudge nudge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And a hearty skull and bones set of secret handshakes all around. How about companies like DynCorps (Mercenaries R Us) who have been caught involved in human slavery, kidnapping and selling women? They still get lucrative government contracts. How about Haliburton doing business with Iran, while the US is officially boycotting them? Same old same old with revolving door government/corporation/government "officers" and "workers" and the "good ole boy" network. The only rules or laws that apply to them are "make money however you can" and "try not to get caught, and if you do, don't worry, if you are big enough, nothing happens anyway".

    The only good thing about it is all corrupt empires eventually fall. History proves this, over and over. The bad thing is it sucks if you are there when it happens.

    If they were to "ban" high level corporations who have been caught ripping off the tax payer and engaging in unethical and illegal behavior, they would have to ban virtually every big corporation that does business with the government, including all the big "Homeland Security" defense contractors. All of them, no exceptions that I am aware of. Take your pick, from lockheed to EDS, and etc, right down the list, all have been busted at one time or another. They get a fine that is basically nothing, that they recoup right back with the next big skim contract.

  15. Just FYI by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gold is a lousy investment. Don't let the receant upswing fool you, unless this defies history, it's only temporary. Gold has been right around $400 an ounce for over two decades. Well, $400 bought you a whole lot more in 1980 than it does now. It flucuates up and down, of course, it's been as low as $264 and as high as $900, but only temporarily. Actually, if you discount the peak in 1980 it's never gone for above $650 which was in 1981.

    So while it's something you can make money on trading in the short term, like any commodity, holding it in the long terms seems to be a bust. Had you bought in 1985, your gold would be worth maybe $100 more per ounce in absolute terms, but in relitive dollars it'd be worth less due to inflation.

    It's a fairly stable medium, in that it's unlikely to ever truly crash and devalue totally, but you can find things nearly as certian that will at least keep up with inflation.

    1. Re:Just FYI by dada21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gold is a lousy investment.

      Just FYI, gold is not an investment. Gold is a store of wealth, a currency, a money. I would never tell you to buy dollars as an investment, why would you think I meant gold is an investment? Gold is merely the same thing as a bank, except it isn't manipulated like the banking cartels are, and it isn't controlled by fiat as the dollar is.

      Don't let the receant upswing fool you, unless this defies history, it's only temporary.

      Historically, gold as been the only store of wealth that has survived every empire, every currency. Gold has held its value for hundreds of years (thousands possibly). When gold had swings was usually when gold was found in mass quantity (5 times in all of history) and when governments manipulated gold (1913, 1931, and 1974). Since 1974, gold has felt some central bank manipulations (the Bank of England was a big one). As gold has entered the hands of private holders, central banks are less likely to manipulate it. Nonetheless, my blog covers the daily manipulations by mines, central banks and investment houses.

      I feel gold has an equilibrium against the dollar of between US$1200 and US$1800 right now. As Greenspan (and soon Bernanke) continues to inflate the dollar, this value will go up. It won't go up (and may temporarily go down with further profit taking) without faith in the dollar collapsing -- which may never happen.

      It flucuates up and down, of course, it's been as low as $264 and as high as $900, but only temporarily. Actually, if you discount the peak in 1980 it's never gone for above $650 which was in 1981

      All correct. The US$264 minimum happened when two central banks dumped gold -- a great increase in supply will always show a great decrease in price. The US$900 price swing was due to investor stupidity, IMO. Just like the stock market sees bubbles created by excess dollars chasing stocks stupidly, the peak was not meant to be at that time. I do believe that we'll see gold hit US$600 this year, but I also believe we'll see it drop to the upper US$460s late February or early March. I am really bugged that investors are buying gold, disturbing the proper supply and demand as we'd see from industrial uses and the monetizing of gold.

      Had you bought in 1985, your gold would be worth maybe $100 more per ounce in absolute terms, but in relitive dollars it'd be worth less due to inflation.

      Bingo. Gold is a store of wealth. Inflation only happens because of currency counterfeiting done (legally) by central banks. In a free market with an open currency standard (anything is currency, basically), you see deflation over time. More people = more productivity = more products = lower prices. Houses fall apart, prices fall. Cars fall apart, prices fall. Except in rare circumstances (such as limited resources, of which the earth has seen few true shortages), prices fall. Involve a central bank counterfeiting our money weekly, and you see prices rise against the fiat currency.

      It's a fairly stable medium, in that it's unlikely to ever truly crash and devalue totally, but you can find things nearly as certian that will at least keep up with inflation.

      An inflation created by those who control the dollar.

      GOLD IS NOT AN INVESTMENT. It is a safe version of the bank. To invest, I buy or invest in local businesses (including my own). I make a great return on my investment. When I have extra money, I buy gold and silver, or I increase the amount of land I own (except where the land is overvalued). If the housing bubble bursts, I'll purchase a home when I see a stable pricing market. I will never buy big houses when housing prices are on a rise.

  16. Unisys morale by typical · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, yes, Unisys is a big company, but unless there is one person posting over and over, they've got the worst goddamn employee morale that I have *ever* seen.

    I see something like twenty posts from Unisys and ex-Unisys employees here that are overwhelmingly negative about the company. I see only *one* that's remotely positive, and that's from a guy who says that he's so detached from Unisys that he barely knows who he's working for -- and *that's* what he considers good.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.