Slashdot Mirror


The U.S. Arcade is Dead?

Via GameSetWatch, an article by one of the editors of GamePro positing that the U.S. arcade is now a dead thing. By positing, I really mean ranting. From the article: "Americans play videogames for one reason and for one reason only, to kick ass. It doesn't matter if you're crushing skulls in the fighting arena or on the football field. Being a virtual DJ, riding a horse (not into battle), and playing other violence-free games is not enough to draw people into arcades. Gaming isn't about having family-friendly fun it's about indulging in man's carnal desires. And then Konami drove the nail through the heart of coin operated gaming... The abomination of videogaming known as DDR served as an outlet for wannabe Travoltas to flail around wildly and quickly made the house of tank simulators and street fighting a haven for lamos. "

26 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Wait... what?! by LordPhantom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, umm, all arcades are havens for Horse Riding(tm) and DDR?
    Someone never played Mortal Combat or any number of the racing games in most arcades. "Lame-o" games didn't kill arcades, the cost of playing at an arcade did (when you can play it at home with people around the world).

    1. Re:Wait... what?! by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's like going to an internet cafe when you have broadband..

  2. Personal Computing Became Affordable by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The arcade died the day powerful personal computers became affordable for the masses. Why go down to the arcade to stand in front of a machine and shovel money when you can just pass disks/carts/CDs around your friends and play all the latest games?

    The trend continued and now "LANNING" is the new norm. Why go out when the Interdoodle has all the game servers you could ever need and your connection is plenty fast enough to use them?

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
    1. Re:Personal Computing Became Affordable by Shadarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only did PCs and consoles become more affordable, they also got better. It used to be that the games you could play at home on your Apple II or NES didn't look as good as the ones in the arcade. Now it's the other way around.

    2. Re:Personal Computing Became Affordable by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct in a sense. Arcades that require you to pay quarters for gameplay are done. Yet, there are planty of Dave and Buster type places that still make a mint.

      They offer peripheral perks that enhance the male driven game market of America like alcohol and the posibility of hooking up with a girl.

      I offer that the real reason arcades in America died is due to the gaming mechanics we enjoyed and the real world manifestations of those games. Fighting games ruled at the arcade I used to frequent. There were multiple machines lined up offering the same titles. Marvel vs. Capcom and Soul Caliber were flooded with aggresive males that wanted to own people.

      The problem arose when some skilled player could play for $0.50 all day as long as the competition lined up. Once the herd caught on to the fadt that they were going to loose if they played, they attempted to wait out the leading player by having him play the AI. Since the player could wax the AI at will, you usually just stood around while the player beat the game.

      That's not alot of fun, especially when you could have been playing Tekken 3 at home while getting drunk with your buds.

      American game culture is not about entertainment, it is about winning. Waiting to win is not fun.

  3. DDR was a good game by AsiNisiMasa · · Score: 3, Funny

    This guy probably only hates DDR because he's no good at it.

    That being said, the arcade is dead because nobody wants to spend a dollar for one fight against their friends in a game they already have at home.

    --
    Help a student gain some exp. http://www.halovariants.com/touchup/index.php
  4. DDR? by Xaroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting that he should pick DDR as signaling the death of arcades, when, in fact, DDR was the beginning of a (albeit temporary) revival of arcades. The death of arcades started many years before DDR's release in the States, beginning with the rise of home gaming.

    Specifically, the main draw of arcades for most goers wasn't the "competition" factor. It was that the technology available in arcade games was leagues above what was available at home. Anyone else remember the Genesis and SNES ports of Mortal Kombat 2? People were willing to pay for play at arcades because the games there were simply BETTER than what was available at home.

    As commodity computing became a reality, and the technology required to run arcade-quality games became widespread, the draw of going to an arcade to play dampened significantly. It got to a point (around '99 or '00, plus or minus a bit depending on locale) where arcade machines were no longer able to outperform home computers and consoles. As a result, people were no longer willing to drop $50 a month at an arcade because they can spend that same $50 at home and get a BETTER gaming experience.

    The reason why DDR did so well in the arcades was because of the speciality of the controllers. The game itself was well-designed, has an easy learning curve, and is attractive to players of both genders. This, coupled with the fact that good dance pads simply weren't feasible to purchse for one's home, meant that a central location (read: an arcade) was an ideal arrangement.

    This, too, however, has been superceded by the level of tech available for home use. Now that reasonable dance pads are available for purchase affordably, the interest in DDR at the arcades has waned. So much so that Konami is no longer producing new machines, and has turned their focus primarily (and in the US, exclusively) to home releases.

    If another thing comes along that substantially improves the gaming experience in a way that simply isn't economical to do in one's home, then the arcade will make a resurgence. No amount of "competitive" gaming draw will cause the same effect. (As an example, I'll point to the rise and fall of LAN-gaming shops.)

    1. Re:DDR? by Kelson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have friends who have successfully used DDR as a workout regimen. If you get the home edition and the dance pads, you can play as long as you want, and it's exercise. If you have friends or roommates who like to play, it's competitive. And if you actually like the game, it's a heck of a lot more fun than riding a stationary bike, or running on a treadmill, or whatever else you might do at the gym.

      Seriously, I've never heard someone say, "Hey, let's go to the gym and work out!" But "Hey, let's go play DDR" works mentally like "Hey, let's go shoot some hoops" and gets you more physical activity than, say, World of Warcraft.

  5. Oh, really? by Tina+Russell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I read that article, I was sort of expecting it to continue past the complaining about DDR, you know, and provide a little depth or backup. You know, explain why he hates DDR so much. Why would you consider DDR to be the death of arcades rather than its financial savior? How could you hate it when it keeps the money coming for venues that will also house Your Favorite Hardcore Fighting Game Doubleplus XP20? And why, you arrogant bastard, do you seem to have the impression that you and you alone can determine what people's tastes should be in electronic amusement machines?

    Slashdot Games has run some great articles, and some unfathomably weak articles. This article, due to its unexplained ranting, general lack of facts, and unfathomable sparseness of content for its three-paragraph length, is the weakest article I've ever seen on Slashdot Games. That's not the writer's fault, though, it was just an off-the-cuff entry for his blog. It's Slashdot Games that ought to be ashamed for wasting our time by running an enraged fluff piece as a legitimate piece of gaming commentary.

  6. Exactly... by Danse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Lame-o" games didn't kill arcades, the cost of playing at an arcade did (when you can play it at home with people around the world).

    Aside from the fact that arcade game variety had dwindled, it was the fact that it had begun to cost a dollar a game or more that really put me off arcades. I used to spend a lot of time and money in them too. But the fact was that we could play more interesting games as much as we wanted at home for less money overall. So really, consoles and the Internet killed the arcade.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  7. Soul Calibur by BigDork1001 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I loved Soul Calibur when it was in the arcade. I spent A LOTE of money playing Soul Calibur. Then one day I realized I'd save money by buying a Dreamcast and Soul Calibur. I saved a lot of money and got to play SC whenever I wanted.

    Arcades are expensive. And I can't remember the last time I saw a game at an arcade I had to play. Maybe the Star Wars arcade game. That was pretty fun. But still, one game. Big deal. I get better gaming experiences hanging out with friends at someone's home playing HALO or Smash Bros. or something like that. Or I'll go online and do that. Arcades were great back in the day but they're being replaced. It happens.

    --
    "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
  8. They have to offer different elements now... by MagicDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think arcades can be saved once they realize that they need to have content that can't be reproduced at home. Why would I want to spend money at the arcade to play Teken or Mortal Kombat when it's available on my home console. The advantage arcades used to have was they could offer games that needed more powerful hardware than what was available on computer or on home consoles. I remember having Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II for Nintendo, but I would still play TMNT at the arcade because the quality was so much better. Now with MAME, we see that PCs have more than enough processing and graphics capability to play arcade games. Couple that with unlimited quarters on the emulator and the draw for traditional arcade games goes way down. Arcades can still draw people though. These days, when I go to an arcade, it isn't to play regular games. I play skiball, because I don't have a skiball machine at home. I play pinball because I don't have a pinnball machine at home. I play gun games like Police 911 because that game uses hardware that I wouldn't have at home. That's where an arcade's strength lies, offering access to hardware and games that aren't practical for people to personally own. Just because the era of the arcade's dominance in computing ability is over, doesn't mean it doesn't have other elements to it.

    1. Re:They have to offer different elements now... by servognome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think arcades can be saved once they realize that they need to have content that can't be reproduced at home.

      They have for a long time. Yu Suzuki described in an interview how when he designs games for the arcade, he specifically looks at integrating unique hardware to add to the experience. Originally this philosophy created games that could charge a premium (eg 75cents to play "Afterburner" in the moving cockpit). Now with consoles and computers being so powerful, that's pretty much all you see in arcades.
      The problem is that games in themselves are not enough to attract an audience. You can drive 20 minutes to go to the arcade to play a game that costs $1 or just play something that may not be quite as entertaining at home free. Where you do see arcades still thrive is at Dave & Busters or Gameworks type places where you get food, get beer, and play some motorcycle racers. The games aren't necessarily the money makers, but they provide entertainment to keep people in the bar buying liquor which is.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  9. Until there are real VR arcades, why bother? by garylian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When VR equipment is at a stage where it is too expensive for the average person to have at home, but is cutting edge enough for arcades to buy it and "rent" it by the hour or so, then we will see arcades make a comeback.

    Just about everyone here in the U.S. has access to a PC. You can play games that are somewhat compatable with the arcade games of the 80's for free on Yahoo Games and similar sites.

    Even plucking some game from the 9.99 bargain rack at BestBuy will get you a game that is better done than pretty much any arcade game worth anything. And that 9.99 will get you a lot farther in that game than it will in an arcade.

    It's a simple Cost vs Reward scenario. High cost, low satisfaction reward.

    The only money I would spend in an arcade is on an old fashion pinball game. Those can still be a lot of fun, when the mood strikes me.

    Even American kinds aren't so dumb as to not figure this out.

  10. Going Retro by Toloran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a great arcade in Portland, OR called "Ground Zero." Its an arcade made up of entirely classics. Pong, Pac Man, Space Invaders, etc. All the great old arcade games in near mint condition. They also have pinball machines (I think).

    Arcades aren't dead, just in a recession which the game industry has know many.

    Arcades initially were for people who wanted to play video games but couldn't afford to buy an arcade machine. They still went strong, although slightly weaker, when home game consoles started to hit it big. Now game consoles are everywhere so arcades are in a decline. Once VR starts to become realistic (cost wise), the first people who are going to afford it are arcades. They'll get people interested and will serve people well until VR becomes cheaper.

    --
    Speaking is NOT communication
  11. Did this guy even try DDR before bashing it? by Travelsonic · · Score: 2, Funny
    And then Konami drove the nail through the heart of coin operated gaming... The abomination of videogaming known as DDR served as an outlet for wannabe Travoltas to flail around wildly and quickly made the house of tank simulators and street fighting a haven for lamos. .

    Oh what's wrong, somebody bitching because they couldn't AAA Sakura on Heavy reversed with stelth mod at 8x original speed?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  12. I still go to arcades... by Saint+Jimmy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in San Diego we have this great arcade called Nickel City. It's owned by Capcom, thus all the games are great, older Capcom games. And instead of paying a dollar to play a game, it costs you a few nickels. We also have a Tilt in one of our malls, which is cool. The only game I play there is Guilty Gear XX, even though I own it. What really draws me to arcades is the chance to own some 25 year old guy who thinks he can play GGXX better than a 19 year old girl. I always get the last laugh...

    --
    To alcohol and cigarettes and Mary-Jane to keep me insane doing someone else's cocaine
  13. It's the evolution of the medium by SalaciousPucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I was a kid, back around the days of Pac Man (like '82), there still existed the singluar arcade - aimed at kids/teens. It was a place that I wasn't allowed and always reaked of weak 70's weed. Adults didn't play games then, cause they didn't grow up playing games.

    Kids today don't need that. It's cheaper to own a XBOX or PS2 and it takes alot less effort than actually commuting to wherever.

    Gaming at home is better for adults too - we all have computers much more powerful than TI-994a's at home, at work and built into our cell phones (we have cell phones). We have entertainment centers more impressive than those old theaters too, and that's why the kids are the only ones that go to theaters now - to get away from us.

    The only really viable market is for the family or for games that just cannot be repeated at home. The arcade is in the Dave & Buster era. Shallow, materialistic, lots of machine guns and gaudy plastic appendages....it's the material excess that comes from reaching maturity, making money, and going corporate. That's where arcade gaming is.

    Eventually gaming will reach the zen state, and the level of Shuffleboarding. I can see it now. I'll be retired, on a park bench in Florida, pwning some 80 yr old noob over a global-supe-dupe-fi connection in Doom XI (sponsored by Efferdent Denture Cream).

    1. Re:It's the evolution of the medium by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its problems like that which drove a local arcade out of business. Rowdy kids ruined the whole thing. My brother's friend had a birthday party there and it ended with a brawl when a gang of 12 kids started with one of the partygoers. And I mean 14 and 15 year olds not 17-20 something's. The 17-20 something's hung outside drinking and smoking weed harassing everyone who entered the building. The best part about the place was the indoor laser tag arena. Worst part was when I herd that a fight broke out and some kid got his head bashed in with the laser tag gun. They did have security but they didn't deter the kids who just didn't give a shit. That arcade lasted about a year.

  14. Tsunami at Chuck E. Cheese by assassinator42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of the actually good things they have at Chuck E Cheese is this bubble thing that moves around. They have some Microsoft games on it, Mech Warrior and Crimson Skies. Those games are actually fun. And they'd be even more fun if there was more than one machine linked together.

  15. Quality GamePro reporting by cgenman · · Score: 3, Informative

    The abomination of videogaming known as DDR served as an outlet for wannabe Travoltas to flail around wildly and quickly made the house of tank simulators and street fighting a haven for lamos.

    On the weekends, do the people at GamePro pretend that they work for a good magazine, like Edge?

    Hmm... non-violent fun... like Mario Kart DS? Animal Crossing? Guitar Hero, Katamari Damacy, SSX, Amplitude, Marble Madness, Puzzle Pirates, Devil Dice, Super Puzzle Fighter, The Sims, Uplink... Yup. No fun games out there that don't involve 'shootin and boobies.

    BTW, I don't care if they do look like Danny Bonaduce, don't make fun of the expert DDR players. Trust me on this: they can kick your ass several dozen times per second. They may look like someone from Riverdance while doing it, but you will just have gotten your ass kicked by someone from Riverdance, which is even worse.

  16. Nickel City by CurtDogg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funny that this story was posted today. I just got back from an extremely well put-together arcade called Nickel City. You pay $2 to get it, and every machine is nickel operated. they cost anywhere from 5-50(DDR's the only one that costs 50) cents. And there's even lots of machines that are on Free Play, including Tetris, Ninja Turtles, Frogger, (Ms.) Pac-Man, Asteroids, and a lot more. You can spend hours there by only spending $5. The one I went to is in San Jose, and the website says there's one in Illinois. www.nickelcitygames.com

  17. Arcades are NOT dead...yet by crazydumbek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the writer of the article is pissed because arcades these days do not cater to his tastes. Tough! Had the writer cared about the type of games in the arcade, then he should have supported it by not buying a gaming rig and play video games on the cheap. Then the arcade would not have lost money, and not have to look elsewhere for revenue like (gasp!) casual gamers.

    But of course that would be silly. The writer did what he had to do to get his gaming fix, and the arcade did what it had to do to stay alive.

    Arcades are not dead. They just evolved. They still serve the purpose of amusing people, but the people they amuse and the means of doing so changed. The video games that the writer rants against are what's keeping the modern arcades afloat. Arcades cannot just cater to the typical console gamer, since those folks hardly show up. The games these days have to be fun, easy to pick up, and something that you can't experience at home.

    I remember playing his paddle boat game with a friend a while back. It had a control mechanism that simulated a real paddle boat. We were going through some prehistoric river. Near the end of the game we were chased by a T-Rex so we began paddling like mad. Our arms were getting tired, but our friends who were watching urged us on and cheered when we escaped. Try simulating that at a home system.

    For the record, I've owned a console since the 2600, and I suck at DDR. However, I do like going to Dave and Busters every now and then with my friends. You know why? Because I like looking at my opponents' faces when I win (or lose) and most of my friends can't even spell 'LAN Party'.

  18. Re:Actually... by G-funk · · Score: 2, Funny

    English motherfucker, do you speak it?

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  19. Re:Pinball by Mprx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pinball beats almost every other arcade game because it's not perfect. You're dealing with real mechanical components, so you can't predict everything. You'll occasionally get a lucky shot that sends the ball flying through the air some place it was never intended to, and you can nudge the table to do seemingly impossible shots. And like scrolling shooters, pinball is a game where you can get into "the zone", where everything flows smoothly and you rack up crazy scores almost unconsciously. Unfortunately tables are rare now, and too many of them are poorly maintained.

  20. VR by fwitness · · Score: 2

    A lot of comments of VR, so I'll add mine. To me, this is one of the biggest mis-steps of the arcade industry. I remember when VR had it's first outing. It was a minumum of $5 to play, the graphics were primitive at best, at playing was charged by the minute. Yet still, it was something I could not get at home and I spent a good chunk of cash there. It's *still* something I can't get at home. However, you can't use the same arcade game for 5 years, and you can't use the same VR setup that long either. It's time to up the ante.

    I've looked at the pricing on some enterprise-level VR companies. Even for extremely good setups, they are not that bad for any reasonable business to afford.

    Arcade Owner:Don't buy 5 more craptastic games, buy one VR setup. Graphics power these days could make some extremely visual and exciting VR games.

    Arcade Developer:Spend some time, do some research, the potential is there, huge, and untapped.

    --
    -- I have fans? Wow.