Slashdot Mirror


Raining Extraterrestrial Microbes in Kerala?

jdfox writes "World Science is reporting on a controversial paper to be published shortly in the peer-reviewed research journal Astrophysics and Space Science, describing a strange red rain that fell in India in 2001, shortly after a meteor airburst event in the area. The authors posit that the red particles found in the raindrops may be extraterrestrial microbes. The authors' last two papers on the subject were unpublished: this published paper is more cautious. The paper can be viewed online, and should obviously be considered in context. More info on the 'panspermia' hypothesis can be found at Wikipedia."

46 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Great. Space herpes. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what we needed.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  2. Oh That Intelligent Designer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spreading his Glorious seed.

    Case closed! Who wants lunch?

  3. Pern? by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least it's not Thread.

  4. sing along~ by dartarrow · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's raining spacemen, Alleluia it's raining spacemen! Ramen!

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  5. First ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Contact!

  6. Venus by TheBlairMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was just Venus' time of the month, and it made it's way through space to reach us here.

  7. Red particles... by mhore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I skimmed over his paper briefly... looking at the images of the red cells and all of that. I noticed that in a few pictures, the cells resemble red blood cells. Perhaps the meteor smashed into a flock of birds? Hah.

    Mike.

    --

    Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    1. Re:Red particles... by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Perhaps the meteor smashed into a flock of birds?"

      Didn't this happen back in the 80's?

      Oh wait, that was a flock of seagulls.

      (OK, I'm sorry already, jeez)

    2. Re:Red particles... by onco_p53 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Interesting idea, but when you prepare SEM samples, they often shrivel up a bit.

      They are about the right size though, these particles range in size from 4 to 10 m. And human RBCs are about 6-8 m. It would explain the lack of a nucleus and DNA too.

      But the TEM images are all wrong (thick "cell wall"), and the low Iron and high silicon content makes it very suspect too.

      Spock's blood?

      But seriously I hope they send some of these things over to other labs for investigation (like mine!) I would start with universal primers, PCR can amplify the tiniest amount of DNA, all they did was dunk the `cells' in Edithium bromide.

    3. Re:Red particles... by Angry+Toad · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would start with universal primers, PCR can amplify the tiniest amount of DNA, all they did was dunk the `cells' in Edithium bromide.

      I call shenanigans on their methodology. All they did was manually grind up the cells - once with a mortar and pestel, once with the same under liquid nitrogen. That **does not** ensure any breakage of many kinds of protist cells.

      We do this kind of stuff in my lab. We frequently have to use a French Press with monstrously high pressures to get many single-celled eukaryotes to break open.

      Looks like some kind of red algae to me.

    4. Re:Red particles... by Oldsmobile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read the article. Very intersting, kinda creepy.

      But I don't like the way he (?) leaves other explanations out:

      "Above arguments and facts indicate that it is difficult to explain
      the red rain phenomenon by using usual arguments like dust storms etc."


      A thorough study of other possibilites would have led more credit to his pet theory. I don't think it is a good idea to use "etc." in a scientific paper. I am not saying that the "above arguments" mentioned in the quote are not valid, but he sure does not dwell on them very long.

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  8. Contradicts Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems this theory has gained some flack from the Intelligent Design community.

    http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.p hp/id/849

    1. Re:Contradicts Intelligence by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The text at the link provided asserts that When it comes to religious questions, the IDEA Center's staff and founders believe that compelling evidence shows that the universe was as a whole designed by a "superintellect" that was not natural.

      They aren't interested in understanding nature. They're just trying to redefine science.

      There are a thousand ways to collaborate scientifically using the Internet. Intelligent Design propenents need to immediately begin describing their ideas more concisely and subjecting them to peer review and public criticism. Without these, their wild speculation will remain subject to extreme ridicule among the educated and their movement will continue to be shunned and exposed as a political and anti-intellectual project, standing for everything science is not.

      The continued silence from ID is not an encouraging sign for their "theory". But there is no shortage of new research that tests, supports, and expands upon the existing evolutionary framework. Evolutionary biology is the only theory which is making real progress with understanding nature.

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    2. Re:Contradicts Intelligence by Kizor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I see why we should draw intelligent designers into this so we can ridicule them again, even though ID has nothing to do with this subject and we're all sick of it anyway.

  9. I for one .... by qwave54 · · Score: 2, Funny

    welcome our new red extraterrestrial microbe overlords!

    Ah well ......

  10. Interesting conclusion... by Inaffect · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "The present study of red rain phenomenon in Kerala shows that the particles, which caused the red colouration of the red rain, are not possibly terrestrial in origin. It appears that these particles may have originated from the atmospheric disintegration of cometary meteor fragmants, which are presumably containing dense collections of red rain particles. These particles have much similarity with biological cells though they are devoid of DNA. Are these cell particles a kind of alternate life from space? If the red rain particles are biological cells and are of cometary origin, then this phenomena can be a case of panspermia where comets can breed microorgranisms in their radiogenically heated interiors and can act as vehicles for spreading life in the universe."
  11. You should read this one by ookabooka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I strongly suggest looking through this article (Yes, I know this is Slashdot, how could I suggest such a thing) as I found the summary made me extremely skeptical. If the information is not falsified, I would say it is certainly worth investigating, even with a hefty grain of salt. . . or would that be grains? . . .anyway I digress. I found the electron microscope pictures quite intriguing, it certainly "looked" like a cell, though I understand this sort of observation is hardly irrefutable. I did not see any evidence of the particles replicating which would suggest life (they could replicate and still not be considered "life" ofcourse). I believe a good analog would be the potential bacteria found in a Martian meteor.

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
  12. Nonsense by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    This human researcher is clearly incorrect.

    The red particles that landed in sector omega-3 were obviously not a virus know as MindGobblers designed to manipulate the portions of your puny brains involved with sensory reception effectivly allow us to transform you into a slave race.

    I suggest you fellow humans all make bad jokes about human researcher and realize his findings are not true.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  13. Iron Oxide Chrondules by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the paper: "Under low magnification the particles look like smooth, red coloured glass beads. Under high magnifications (1000x) their differences in size and shape can be seen,"

    These are iron oxide chrondules from the vaporisation of a nickel-iron meteorite. There's no need to invoke aliens or intelligent designers.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    1. Re:Iron Oxide Chrondules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not flaming you or anything (I skimmed the paper myself, and the quality of it is shoddy at best - just check out the references), but Google isn't turning up anything on "chrondules" - enlighten us? The paper jumps to outrageous conclusions, and makes the claim that they are "cell-like" with fine membranes but doesn't bother analyze membrane composition!

    2. Re:Iron Oxide Chrondules by barakn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Iron oxide chondrules with carbon as the main ingredient? I don't think so... did you see the elemental analyses?

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    3. Re:Iron Oxide Chrondules by krel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you read the second paper, you'll see the cells are clearly alive. The only question is whether they came from space.

      --
      karma: ouch!
    4. Re:Iron Oxide Chrondules by durandal61 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless they botched their elemental composition analysis, they appear to be mostly carbon and oxygen. Page 9 of the latest preprint (pardon the formatting):

      Element Wt % Atomic % Standards
      C 49.53 57.83 CaCO3
      O 45.42 39.82 Quartz
      Na 0.69 0.42 Albite
      Al 0.41 0.21 Al2O3
      Si 2.85 1.42 Quartz
      Cl 0.12 0.05 KCl
      Fe 0.97 0.24 Fe

      In any case, the first two preprint's language made me cringe. The whole "life-cycle" section.... [shudder]

      --
      My motorbike travels in Chile.
    5. Re:Iron Oxide Chrondules by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think so... did you see the elemental analyses?

      Yes I did, but I don't believe it. I think they've messed up the analysis. SEMs are better suited to thin films than particulates, and the components listed in their analysis don't seem a good match for the physical characteristics of the particles.

      If there actually is a high proportion of carbon in the material, it's likely to be from an iron-rich calcium carbonate meteorite instead.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Iron Oxide Chrondules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You'd think carbon was rare or otherwise exceptional in meteorites. It isn't. It is abundant in carbonaceous chrondites. Some of them practically look like charcoal. But you're right, the analysis shows these things aren't mainly iron.

      I don't see anything clearly biological here, and even if there was, the connection to something extraterrestrial rather than terrestrial is tenuous. Don't get me wrong -- it's interesting, but A) there's already a long history of such hunts in ordinary meteorites, and B) that hunt has been pretty unsatisfying, with loads of examples of probable or demonstrated terrestrial contamination, and loads of examples of things that "look like" biological structures, but aren't upon more detailed examination.

      People are *way* too interested in seeing something exotic here rather than looking at all the possibilities, including ordinary mineralogical ones, and ordinary terrestrial ones. The authors have done a poor job of eliminating some of these others. Where is the extraordinary evidence for the extraordinary claims? I mean, that analysis is really poor in some ways. Using EDAX on an SEM rather than a dedicated microprobe is a poor way to do it for such small structures, and where's the X-ray diffraction in case there is anything crystalline here? Not even attempted.

      At least the DNA/RNA tests do look decent, because they included a positive test of the technique and were apparently thorough about breaking the structures up, but there is no guarantee there would be DNA or RNA present if there has been sufficient degradation (in either hypothesis!). What if these are highly degraded fungal spores? Their cell walls are extremely durable (they survive for geological eons). That hypothesis could explain the composition, the morphology, and the absence of DNA or RNA. Why didn't they test for the presence of typical fungal spore wall materials?

      Finally, I find the arguments regarding the connection to the supposed meteor airburst rather ridiculous. The evidence for the event itself is poor in the first place -- sonic boom? That's it? I'm sorry, I need a little more than that. How do we know there weren't supersonic military aircraft in the area the time, or that people were mistaking something else for a sonic boom? Worse, most of the arguments they use to dispute the possibility of a terrestrial source contributing to the location of the fallout for 2 months would also apply to a meteor. What, there aren't any high-altitude winds here? The plume just lingered for that long? Is there something about meteor plumes that allow them to linger but not the terrestrial possibilities? High-altitude volcanic ash can spread across a whole continent in just a few days!

      No, I think a regional terrestrial source is much more likely for whatever these things are, and they've done a poor job eliminating that possibility. Given all the weird stuff that sometimes gets sucked up into rainstorms and later found falling to the ground (e.g., frogs, fish), you've got to be skeptical, unless we're going to claim those could be extraterrestrial too.

  14. Common occurance by Belseth · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've read about quite a few of these colored rain falls and most of them have an obvious terrestrial source. They usually are volcanic or caused by birds or insects. It's one thing for trace amounts of organic matter to survive reentry but large amounts are highly unlikely. Organic material would mostly be incinerated. A comet fragment would have a better chance with the ice protecting the organic matter. I doubt the paper will survive peer review.

    1. Re:Common occurance by Angry+Toad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've said this in other posts on this thread, but it bears repeating. Their methods are not kosher at all, and if anyone with any background in biological sciences, in particular with a background in the study of microorganisms, had been involved in the review process this paper would never have seen the light of day.

        The authors clearly have no understanding of biology beyone "it has DNA in it and is carbon-based". Their methods, in particular their "study" of the DNA content, are laughably off-base and reveal a total lack of understanding of how to handle microorganisms which have a thick cell wall.

          Trivial test - stain them for bloody cellulose! This is such an obvious damn thing to do that the only excuse for not doing it is (a) they don't know enough to try, or (b) they did and didn't like the results so they didn't mention them, which is probably more likely.

          This is a stupid paper.

  15. Quick, geeks by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look for the woman infected with an alien micro-organism that gives her the powerful urge to mate quickly in order to produce her world-dominating alien-human crossbid progeny. Of course, she'll probably kill you afterwards, but it's all the change some of you will get before you die anyhow!

  16. Good grief - more stuff sent to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now even the aliens are sending microbe jobs to India! Where does it end? Not at the atmosphere, apparently. Somewhere in space, some alien GE executive overlord has gotten his or her bonus for the year. Oh well, the quality will suck, quality assurance will suck, they'll miss their deadline for taking over the planet, and the project will fail.

    I guess we're safe.

  17. This could be more serious than we thought... by titzandkunt · · Score: 2, Funny


    I was going to post a longer comment, but two Marine officers have arrived at my house in an unmarked car. All they said was:

    "Dr Titzandkunt? There's been a fire."

    Gotta go!

    T&K.

    ...a clue for the clueless:clicky clicky

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  18. Elemnetal composition of the particles by S3D · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The /. editorial doesn't mention elemental composition of the particles. From TFA:
    45.4% quartz (!) 49.5% carbonate calcium
    Doesn't look like life or organic at all. Another case of wishful thinking.

  19. My $.02 by barakn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The elemental analyses provided in the paper suggest a composition of of mostly carbohydrate with a smattering of something like a hydrocarbon. My guess is that they're some sort of pollen that had their DNA destroyed by ultraviolet light high in the atmosphere and then absorbed water and swelled. Nothing that couldn't have come from our own planet.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  20. Would have to be a bloody big bird by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The article claims that about 50.000kg fell down. Now that is a heck of a turkey even by US standards. (How 50.000kg becomes 55tons is anyones guess)

    Anyway you would expect other things, like hail of McNuggets in a meteroid vs bird incident.

    It is a weird incident in anycase. If it is a life form then the fact that so much of it fell down could this mean the entire meteroid was made of it?

    The previous theories suggested that small microbes might hide among the rocky part of the asteroid. Not the entire asteroid being made of it.

    Also why is this taking so long? India is a tech nation isn't it? In 4 years they should have been able to analyze this down the individual atoms.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Would have to be a bloody big bird by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just made a copy/paste from an online converter ;)

      Though, to correct your american ignorance, the thousands-separator varie between countries, as does the rest of the punctuation. In the USA you guys use commas, in the UK it's periods, in France just a space and in Switzerland it's " ' ", and that's just the ones I know.

      Thus, one million dollars and fifty cents would be spelled:

      In the USA: $1,000,000.50
      In the UK: $1.000.000,50
      In France: $1 000 000,50
      In Switzerland: $1'000'000.50

      Yup, it sometimes makes it a helluva confusing...

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  21. Intelligent Design by liangzai · · Score: 3, Funny

    This could be the ultimate proof the ID camp has been looking for... God jerking off, spreading his seed, instilling life into the lifeless soil. The Beloved Gardener in the Heavenly Paradise Cometh unto us.

  22. Meteor theory amusing but not necessary by barakn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The prevalence of the red rain along the southwest coast of India is explained in the paper as being the trail of a meteor that happened to follow the coast. I explain it with this June- Sept precipitation map, which shows the coast receiving 150 cm of rain while areas immediately to the east get 30 cm. Red rain fell in areas where rain is likely to fall. No need to invoke a meteor for which there is little evidence.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  23. bad paper by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this were related to panspermia, one would expect to find DNA or RNA and they didn't. But their experiments were pretty poor to begin with: it's easy to test for lipids, proteins, sugars, amino acids as well and they didn't.

  24. This illustrates a problem by bremstrong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This illustrates a problem with the way science is presently conducted.

    Apparently, two years ago a scientist in India wrote a paper about a long series of tests he conducted on a potential non-dna based life form that can reproduce at 300C and may have arrived on a comet.

    Of course it sounds unlikely, but if he's right, it is the scientific find of the century.

    And, he has samples of the purported organism.

    If scientists were really seeking uncover truth, they'd have repeated his work at five different labs and see if it held up.

    Instead, they're all to scared of looking silly to their peers, and they barely even let the Indian researcher publish his findings!

    Does anyone else see this as a problem?

  25. we have just entered a distinct era in history by lordholm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Both warp drives and aliens the same week. It should be clear that the alien bacteria detected the warp drive research and decided to make contact, unfortunately the all perished when their space ship blew up over India.

    Now, we will never know what they wanted, and their friends will believe that we shot them down...

    --
    "Civis Europaeus sum!"
  26. Re:The Reds are coming! by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since you're quoting the linked article, you may as well copy the whole paragraph evenif it hurts some feelings:

    "Kerala boasts the highest literacy rate in the country (70%), a low infant mortality rate, and is the only state in which females outnumber males. Land distribution is among the most equitable in India, at least partly due to the progressive land ownership policies instituted more than a century ago in what was then the princely state of Travancore. Further extensive land reforms in the 1960's and 70's were carried out by a state government which gained the distinction, in 1957, of being the first democratically elected communist government in the world. Kerala's industrial sector is almost non-existent, however, potential investors from outside being reluctant to engage a highly politicized labour force."

    Huh-oohhh, communism that *does* work? Funny how things go when there's no embargo impeding on people's will.

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Yes, that must be it... by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Raining Extraterrestrial Microbes in Kerala?

    Meanwhile, Occam turned in his grave.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  29. The research and paper seem quite factual by Morgaine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> This is a stupid paper.

    Not at all. Their research examines quite a large range of characteristics of the particles and of the rainfall, and even presents some controls. It's not as tight as some nor, as sloppy as others, but falls well within the mean of the scientific method.

    The fact that one particular type of test was not performed by them does not make this a stupid paper --- it just leaves that analysis for some other team to perform. Indeed, they seem to have covered a collosal amount of ground for a single research group already.

    Their Discussion section is not part of their scientific findings, but merely provides room for discussion. Non-DNA-based "life" from outer space is a *possible* handwaving interpretation at best, but since no other interpretation matches both the microscopic visual structure and the chemical composition and the rain-distribution pattern simultaneously, it's the best we have at this stage.

    >> Trivial test - stain them for bloody cellulose!

    Go right ahead and do it yourself, or communicate with them about it. But who said that ET life would employ cellulose anyway? That notwithstanding, it would be a useful test to perform anyway, as it would help discount other possibilities.

    Their earlier non-peer-reviewed papers might have been worth your label of "stupid" (meaning non-scientific) in part, but this one is quite factual in all its research sections.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  30. "peer review" is not always peer review by hde226868 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Although Astrophysics and Space Science is peer reviewed, you should be aware that this journal is not held in very high esteem by the astronomy and astrophysics community (contrary to, e.g., the Astrophysical Journal, Astronomy and Astrophysics, or the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society). If you don't believe me, take a look at the impact factor of the journal , which is 0.2, while it is greater than 4 for the renowed astronomical journals (the 2.1 for Astronomy and Astrophysics in the list cited is wrong, but the remaining impact factors for astronomical journals more or less scale with the journal's image in the community).

    To understand how this article could be published, you should be aware that for all scientific journals the editor has the last responsibility for accepting a paper, not the peer reviewers. In the case of Astrophysics and Space Science, the editorial board contains N.C. Wickramasinghe, who is one of the inventors of the panspermia theory. So, even although peer reviews might have been dodgy, it could have been an editorial decision to accept this paper.

    I happen to know that Astrophysics and Space Science operates this way, as a manuscript I co-reviewed with a PhD student of mine several years ago appeared in the journal without taking any of our recommendations into account. This has not happened to me with any of the 30odd manuscripts I have refereed since and is even more astonishing since the journal decided to print the original manuscript, without even addressing the large number of grammatical mistakes and spelling errors pointed out by us (which were so bad that we, as referees, could not understand what the authors were trying to say). I have declined to referee for Astrophysics and Space Science since and consider the journal a "scientific tabloid" as opposed to a "scientific broadsheet". And you wouldn't believe the "Sun" and the "News of the World" either, right?

    So, to conclude, "peer refereed" does not always mean what you might think it does, and although I am not a microbiology specialist, as long as a report on the "red rain" is not accepted by a mainstream journal, would doubt any claims made in the article.

  31. Life != DNA and ET Microbes != Panspermia by Larthallor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So many conclusions, so much jumping, so little logic.

    • First and foremost, this is most likely not a life form. Such a finding would be the greatest discovery in fundamental biology since pinning down the function and structure of DNA. The announcement of such discoveries by frauds and the mistaken are much more common than the actual thing. However, it is possible that these are extraterrestrial spores. If the second unpublished paper describing reproduction is accurate (a big "if"), then they most likely are extremeophiles and are possibly extraterrestrial in origin.
    • DNA is not a requirement for life, as many commenters here have written. DNA (and/or RNA) is at the core of all life on Earth because all present life forms appear to have a common ancestor that used these molecules for it's genetics. The fundamental mechanism used to replicate oneself is the most likely of traits to be highly conserved in evolutionary biology and this is exactly what we are seeing. However, this does not imply that DNA (or RNA) is the only such mechanism possible, especially when the environment that fostered the transition from inorganic to organic is in a different temperature/pressure regime (300 degrees C!). Just as DNA would be useless as a genetic mechanism in the kinds of environments the paper's authors say they see replication in, a molecule that is useful in that environment would not likely be chemically functional in our relatively frigid and low pressure Earth surface environment.

      Therefore, absence of DNA is not unexpected.

    • If this does turn out to be extraterrestrial life, then the possibility that life could drift from world to world becomes a fact. This does not, however, mean that the origin of life here on Earth is due to such transport. Just because it is possible doesn't mean it has happened, let alone is responsible for the modern biosphere.

      The people that make the instant leap from the possibility of interplanetary spores surviving to the assumption that this must be how life began here have always puzzled me. After all, the life in such a scenario had to develop somewhere before traveling to Earth. Why is it so difficult to believe that the life we see today is truly indigenous?

      I think I now realize why these people are so ardent that life came from somewhere else: they continue to be mired in the historical notion that the beginning of life required some unique event to get started. In this way, they have much in common with creationists and the general public. The lesson to take from this if it is real is not that life came from space, but that life springs out of non-life with relative ease.

  32. Re:Sauce by Attrition_cp · · Score: 2, Funny

    RAmen.

    --
    Touched By His Noodley Appendage.