Slashdot Mirror


The 10 Most Interesting People in Gaming for 2005

jkdove writes "GamerGod rolls out their list of "The 10 Most Interesting People in Gaming for 2005". From the article: "Our list draws from a wide slice of the gaming community. A respected game designer is on the list, but so is a political figure, a game player, a man with an agenda, and even a modder. Each person was selected for their ability to grab and hold the headlines with their design, deeds, or words; and for their contribution to twelve months of gaming headlines, news, scandals, sensations, and entertainment.""

27 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Predictions for 2006 by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sadly, no matter how absolutely ridiculous, I have a feeling the US Congress will make the list for 2006.

  2. I Am Exploring The Outer Limits Of Slacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am exploring the outer limits of slacking and procrastinating on my companies latest game engine...

    and I want the 30 seconds I just wasted skimming through that list back.

    Slashdot really needs to do a story on just how worthless game journalism is these days...

    1. Re:I Am Exploring The Outer Limits Of Slacking by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  3. Here's the best on that list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Here's the best on that list by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interestingly, some websites go down when you even think of linking to them from slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Hmmm by Artie+Dent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By including Jack Thompsonas the number one most interesting person in gaming, it makes a dangerous assumption that to be associated with doesn't mean you are in it. No matter how important, ridiculous, or inflammatory his actions might be, I still find it hard to characaterize him as "in gaming".

    1. Re:Hmmm by Lonath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still find it hard to characaterize him as "in gaming".

      It might help if we look at "gaming" as a metaphorical person. If "gaming" is viewed in this way, then Jack Thompson would be trying to ram his flaccid cock into gaming's ass while screaming "WHOSYERDADDY!!!!" and "IMAGUNASUEYOU!!!!!" over and over. From that perspective, I think we could characterize him as "in gaming".

  5. A lot of odd names by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There were a tremendous number of people on the list that I'd never heard of, which suggests a fair amount of creativity when picking names. Where's John Carmack, who's building rockets? What about Bono, who's helping back elevation? Then there's Gabe Newell, who's work with Steam is slowly changing how game publishing is done.

    Perhaps girls who lick PSPs are more interesting, but somehow less important than the above.

  6. Headline grabbing == interesting? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since when does headline grabbing equal interesting? Why do we need a list giving attention grabbing whores MORE attention?

    How about some people who have moved the media forward? Will Wright, Old Grandma Hardcore and Brenda Braithwaite from that list look like they qualify. Who else? If you answer Carmack I may harm you.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    1. Re:Headline grabbing == interesting? by cortana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Carmack: the last OpenGL programmer (in gaming).

  7. Leroy Jenkins by cgenman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reviewer does an inadequate job of describing the Leroy video. They're heading into basically a pit of death to get an item that Leroy needs, while Leroy himself is Away From Keyboard. So the crew spends a lot of time planning strategy, discussing timing, pulling out calculators to determine survival rates, and generally creating a rock solid, well-discussed, intricate plan of attack... That Leroy promptly ignores and charges in.

    And they all get slaughtered. Not just killed, slaughtered. They get mauled like puppies in a lion's den. The plan falls apart completely, and so do they. Not only are there no survivors, they didn't take any of the millions of attackers out with them. It is a complete blow out.

    To top it all off, over voice chat comes this little wimpering voice saying "It's... It's not my fault."

    Perfect.

    1. Re:Leroy Jenkins by sgant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But you must know that was all staged right? Even the banter in the beginning was just plain fake. "let me do some calculations...I give us a blah blah percent chance". I mean, what calculations are you frickin making there?

      And besides, this is WoW...in which death means nothing except running back to your corpse.

      Also, have you been where they were? did you see them all just like run around stepping on all the eggs and not even doing anything except letting themselves be killed?

      Let's face it, if Leeroy had run in there by himself, my guild would have just stood there and let him die, then we'd rez him...that's it.

      I mean, it's a VERY funny video, but it's fake.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:Leroy Jenkins by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Leroy Jenkins by HansF · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those links are 'registration only' or dead, another (compressed version) is here.

      --
      --> Insert Funny Sig Here
    4. Re:Leroy Jenkins by n00tz · · Score: 2, Funny

      "At least I have Chicken" best part.

      --
      I had college once, but I drank some fluids and got a lot of rest and eventually it was cured.
  8. Top Ten Reasons Top Ten List Suck by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 5, Funny

    10. They always leave something essential out
      9. They do it on purpose to generate "buzz"
      8. Even David Letterman doesn't hit the mark everytime
      7. Should be titled "9 things that didn't win and the one that did"
      6. They include URL's like this: http://www.joystiq.com/2005/12/12/psp-licker-vows- to-rub-games-on-her-butt/ (from TFA)
      5. 9 times out of 10 you don't agree with their number one pick
      4. 47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot
      3. Jack Thompson will argue that top ten list are terrorist training for suicide bombers (counting backwards like a bomb timer)
      2. The woman sitting next to me on the bus read "suicide bomber" on my laptop and is notifying the police
      1. People love arbitrary catagorizing. We're all winners! Uh, no the police have surrounded the bus...

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
    1. Re:Top Ten Reasons Top Ten List Suck by myspys · · Score: 4, Funny

      6. They include URL's like this: http://www.joystiq.com/2005/12/12/psp-licker-vows- to-rub-games-on-her-butt/ (from TFA)

      dude, she's cute (http://media.babes.entertainment.ign.com/articles /622/622426/img_2838400.html) and by definition that makes everything alright [nods]

  9. Re:Darn, site /.ed already by shadowcode · · Score: 5, Informative
  10. Hmm by cortana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would be much more interested to read about ten people who had created and actually released genuinely good games.

  11. Leeeroy by simrook · · Score: 3, Funny

    To me, the Leeroy Jenkins video is something like a George Bush clip show on Letterman. Everytime I play with some idiot in a pick up group, I now laugh a little bit thinking that this idiot might be the next Leeroy Jenkins; just like everytime George gets on his soap box, I think how entertaining this will be on Letterman or Jon Stewart tonight.

    Let's do this! Geeeeeeoooooooooooooorrrrrge Bush!

    --
    'Truth' is linked in a circular relation with systems of power which produce and sustain it...
  12. What is "interesting"? by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, but you know their names. To me, that's part of the phrase "interesting". If you never heard of the girl licking the PSP photo, it's likely that's not really interesting. Gabe and Carmack, even if you disagree with their points of view, might be considered quite interesting. Gabe's certainly made a bunch of people upset when he lied about HL2's release, and made even more mad when he linked Steam to HL2, but it's hard to argue that his actions haven't affected a large number of gamers, publishers, and hardware makers over the last few years. Carmack's in a similar boat, upsetting some people and evoking worship from others. Plus he makes serious rockets in his spare time.

    To me, those things are interesting.

    1. Re:What is "interesting"? by rblancarte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to agree. At first, when I saw this list, I was thinking we were going to see programmer and publisher names. IMHO, this list is very interesting and making a very good point about where the public attention really is focused.

      As far as why they don't have Carmack or Newell. Because they just are no longer news worthy. Half-Life 2 came out in 2004. So far Valve really hasn't done much since then. Sure they have used Steam to release some new very small titles, but to say that this has shifted the way that games are distributed - no. Sorry, Steam is the only one doing this. I don't see any other company doing it, yet. Sure, in the future, maybe, but not right now.

      And Carmack - he has never really been that interesting. His whole thing has always been - release new game w/ spectacular engine, but so-so game built on it. Sell for a few million, then license out for mega-millions and let other companies make better games than ours. Maybe make an occasional talk about technology and what is going to be needed for the next-gen of games. IMHO, John Romero was much more interesting at his height than Carmack at his height. At least Romero was out and about, making sure his face (and hair) were seen. And he was out there attempting to (though failing miserably at) making games that were going to truly revolutionize gaming.

      Besides - guys, they defined their list at the top. Why these people were on the list. What they have done, said, etc to get them on the list. And their biggest thing was that they have gotten their names/faces in the media and have some how been able to stay there.

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  13. What a crappy list! by Vincman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all that list is way too short. If you want to credit people that have benefited the industry in 2005, AND include people from all related areas, it should be a top-100. Second, the most innovative game I played in 2005 was Fahrenheit, aka Indigo Prophecy, and David Cage should be on that list for making it. How many new games that were completely different from what came before did you see in 2005?

  14. Little Brother? by Madpony · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me like the XBox has some years on 360. I think the XBox 360 is the true little brother ;)

  15. Blind Gamer by rk2z · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't know about you guys, but I think that this is definitely one of the most "interesting" gamers of 2005. Today's local Lincoln, NE newspaper had a front-page story about Brice Mellen, blind from birth, but will kick your ass at Mortal Kombat.

    blind Gamer

    He was also profiled over the summer in the national media

    google cache of CNN story

    --
    This is a sig, there are many like it, but this is mine.
  16. Re:I'm waiting for another list by zalas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of which half of the list will be duplicates...

  17. 'Hot Coffee' the interesting of the 10? by Hard-Format · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it funny that without the least interesting (number 10) of the list three other more interesting (numbers 8, 7, and 1) would either not have happened, or would be significantly less interesting. While the 'Hot Coffee' mod might not have been terribly interesting on its own, the fact that it spawned this much attention surely must warrant a higher spot than number 10.