Slashdot Mirror


Details of the LiveJournal Account Hacks

An anonymous reader writes "Brian Krebs of the Washington Post has written about the recent spate of hijackings at Six Apart's popular LiveJournal service. Hundreds of journals have now been taken over by a notorious group called 'Bantown' using a series of complicated cross-site-scripting vulnerabilities. Krebs details the recent security changes made by LiveJournal in response to the takeovers." From the article: "It is unclear whether LiveJournal has managed to close the security holes that the hackers claim to have used. The company says it has, but the hackers insist there are still at least 16 other similar JavaScript flaws on the LiveJournal site that could be used conduct the same attack. [Bantown] group members said they plan to turn their attention to looking for similar flaws at another large social-networking site. "

44 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. Blog by Ribbo.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they should write about how they did it in their blog, I mean someone elses blog.....

    1. Re:Blog by Ribbo.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The correct answer to any "What is the point" question is always "Because they can". Just like the idiots who insist on being the first to post to any new thread, others also crave "being the first" no matter how pointless, insignificant or downright rude it is. It will take a much smarter person than me to work out why they do it (maybe they actually want a job in internet security!)

    2. Re:Blog by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It will take a much smarter person than me to work out why they do it (maybe they actually want a job in internet security!)

      I'm not smarter than you but I know that those who fuck things up for the rest of us tend to be young (chronologically or mentally) interested in "making a mark". Like peeing to claim territory.

      I'm not immune to the occasional harmless troll myself, but this is just pure abuse.

  2. Poor Emos! by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nooo! Poor Emos! I can just see them shivering in a cold, dank corner, cutting themselves because their journal was hi-jacked. What is becoming of this world?!

    1. Re:Poor Emos! by hkgroove · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can just see them shivering in a cold, dank corner, cutting themselves because their journal was hi-jacked.

      No, they wouldn't. Because there's no longer a reason to cut themselves! No one can read or comment about it.

    2. Re:Poor Emos! by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  3. Wake up call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a wake up call to people who use these services... sites like MySpace, LiveJournal, all have fancy features that do things that "users want", but at the expense of security because users don't think of/realize/care about security unless it actually results in a successful hack against them. Those who have hacked LJs might want to consider running their blog using plain text instead of all that wacky Javascript (not exactly necessary for something as basic as text on a web page). Ya get what you pay for... I'd be pretty choked if I was a LJ user who paid for a membership and had my pages all highjacked beyond repair, though...

    1. Re:Wake up call by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      myspace already got owned by a javascript worm that worked it's way into millions of profiles.

      now instead of fixing the site it asks you for your password 50 f*cking times a day.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Wake up call by deep44 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is a wake up call to people who use these services... sites like MySpace, LiveJournal, all have fancy features that do things that "users want", but at the expense of security because users don't think of/realize/care about security unless it actually results in a successful hack against them.
      While I agree with your point, keep in mind that the accounts in question were compromised when the account owner clicked on a web link pointing to malicious JavaScript, which then stole the appropriate LiveJournal cookie. A plain text blogging service wouldn't stop this sort of thing; this problem was centered around authentication & session management.
    3. Re:Wake up call by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) The problem was actually in IE's ability to fix and execute broken CSS code which allowed him to input a broken call to a script to get it past the filters and then have IE fix and execute it. THe author himself took down his profile to stop the spread and after a few hours of downtime the problem was fixed, in fact there's a /. article about it. 2) You have to enter your password every time you log out, which is every time you close your browser. Never close the browser never log out. Simple.

  4. Oh dear! by Junky191 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How on Earth are all those white kids in the suburbs going to express their teen angst now?

    1. Re:Oh dear! by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 4, Informative

      How on Earth are all those white kids in the suburbs going to express their teen angst now?

      How on Earth are all those white kids in the suburbs going to express their teen angst now?

      I wouldn't know mate. I'm in my 30s, and I use LJ to keep in touch with family and friends around the world (UK, Australia, US and South Africa mostly).

      Or at least I did, until my account was hacked and locked today. A good number of other accounts are in the same boat. I just hope that the LJ admins sort it out soon. My account email address was changed to bantownlj292@mailinator.com . I just hope my posts are OK. I can't even tell at present.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    2. Re:Oh dear! by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever try email?

      What, I should write emails to everyone I know saying "The weather in London is rubbish today....". Sorry, but different technologies are best suited to different things. I let them all know that I have an LJ, and those that want to will go and read it, if and when they want to.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  5. I bet it's myspace by janvo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm betting that this group will take down myspace accounts next. That website is notoriously bad for bugs and well, in my opinion is just horribly written. I guess we'll see what 'Tom' has to say ... :)

    1. Re:I bet it's myspace by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd be more impressed if they could index every dirty picture on MySpace and copy them all out so you could look at them in some linear way without having to work through all that annoying crap about peoples lifes. Gee at least that'd be useful.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  6. Re:Livejournal hacks? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've seen your pictures and can definitively say that the hackers were doing the world a service.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  7. Legal Implications by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Informative
    In LiveJournal's TOS, they state:
    JOURNAL CONTENT

    Guidelines for posting to your online journal shall be as follows:

    1. All Content posted to LiveJournal.com in any way, is the responsibility and property of the author. LiveJournal is committed to keeping the Service in decent standing for all audiences but is not responsible for the monitoring or filtering of any journal Content. Within the confines of international and local law, LiveJournal.com will generally not place a limit on the type, or appropriateness of user content within journals. Those users posting material not suitable for all audiences must agree that they are fully responsible for all the content they have posted anywhere on the service. Should content be deemed illegal by such law having jurisdiction over the user, LiveJournal.com is committed to submitting all necessary information to the proper authorities; ....
    So it sounds like they might be in trouble with people losing property, however also in the TOS:
    MODIFICATIONS TO SERVICE

    LiveJournal.com reserves the right to modify or discontinue, temporarily or permanently, the Service (or any part thereof) with or without notice at any time. You agree that LiveJournal.com shall not be liable to you or to any third party for any modification, suspension or discontinuance of the Service.
    And there are other parts that make it sound like LiveJournal would never be in trouble for this unauthorized access parts. But really, who would bother to post their thoughts and words on a site that has no garauntee of saving them? At any minute, LiveJournal could format its servers and databases and start over with no one able to say anything.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  8. Is Six Apart able to deal with this properly? by mpontes · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've been following this lately, and Six Apart's behaviour on this situation seems quite lacking. If what the article says is true and bantown have been just stealing cookies, the only measure they took, a recent change in LJ's subdomain policy seems quite pointless, since cookies are binded to .livejournal.com, anyway.

    They also don't tell us which browser is affected on the newspost. How can we be safe if we are not informed? Can Six Apart actually deal with this in a professional way? I've been noticing LiveJournal is really slow and it hangs a lot lately. It seems that they know nothing about security and are just randomly mashing buttons in a attempt to hit the nail in the head.

    Is Six Apart that incompetent that they can't prevent such attacks after they have been going for days, or is this bantown group really that good?

    --
    Bored? Browse Slashdot with a +6 modifier for Troll comme
    1. Re:Is Six Apart able to deal with this properly? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The LiveJournal development and support staff have always been incompetent. In the past, they've compensated paid users with extensions on their subscriptions because of extended service problems they didn't seem to know how to fix. Most recently, they moved their servers from Seattle to L.A., and for the next month, nobody was receiving their comment notifications. They claimed to have fixed it, then realized they hadn't, then sort of brushed it under the rug. I'm still missing all my comment notifications from the month following November 22, 2005. (And there's no other way to follow threads in communities.)

      In many ways, LiveJournal is becoming one of those sites that people only use because it's well-established. If it were new, the glaring problems with the software that runs it would leave it DOA... much like Photo.net and Slashdot.

  9. Ahhhhh security.... in Web 2.0 land by TedTschopp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As we move more towards applications that depend on the JavaScript enabled client (AJAX and all his relatives) we will see more of this hacking.

    On the bright side, it will eventually get people to code securely in a non-trusted enviroment becuase the source code is not only available, but changeable.

    Sadly, there will be a bunch of rough lessons between that wonderful future and what we have right now, espeically with all the focus on WEB 2.0 and Ajax.

    --
    Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
  10. Even more appalling... by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they hacked into my LJ and corrected all the meter in my "I am sad/I want to die" goth poetry!

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  11. Oh dear!-SlashBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "How on Earth are all those white kids in the suburbs going to express their teen angst now?"

    Post to Slashdot.

  12. Details are scarce. by Peganthyrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would've been nice if LJ's news post on starting to fix this vulnerability had said which "popular browser" was affected.

    Also, I somehow find myself suspecting that the anonymous person calling this 'Bantown' group 'notorious' is probably a member of it.

    Details are scarce; all I could find in the LJ_Dev community relating to this wasone post about the effects of the first phase of the fix. Especially check Brad's comments.

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
  13. Great! by blake3737 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great! While they're in there hacking around they can fix all the spelling errors and bad grammer so prolific in LJ

    1. Re:Great! by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then, they should break into Slashdot and fix the spelling of "grammar" in your comment ;-)

      -Stephen

    2. Re:Great! by mattmacf · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...all the spelling errors and bad grammer so prolific in LJ

      You realize where you're posting this, right?

      --
      I only mod funny =D
  14. Seen on a hacked page by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Current mood: 0wned

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  15. Re:Ahhhhh security.... in Web 2.0 land by aztracker1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see how it will necessarily be *more* dangerous than today... simply hit some main points.. strip script tags altogether from user input... or detect/escape them. with link tags, remove them if the href starts with "javascript:" and third, remove on* event attributes from any user inputted tags... issue resolved (for the most part)...

    The problem isn't the level of javascript in a site, the problem is checking/validating user input. This is something most developers, especially professional ones, should know.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  16. it was funny by conJunk · · Score: 4, Funny
    that was the funniest part of TFA:

    So far, the damage has been mostly harmless. The most high-profile case so far came in mid-October when one Myspace.com user released a self-replicating computer worm that took advantage of Javascript flaws to add more than a million fellow users to his buddy list. A similar worm hit the online community Xanga on New Year's eve (there is also some strong language at this link.)

    he used his worm to add people to his buddy list! that's really really funny! look how popular i am! i've got millions of friends! no one will laugh at me now!... er... i uh... yes... i wrote a worm to make friends for me....

  17. MySpace by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Funny
    [Bantown] group members said they plan to turn their attention to looking for similar flaws at another large social-networking site.

    [ says to himself ]
    Please let it be MySpace. Please let it be MySpace.

  18. Re:I don't know by neocon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ``Lambs'', of course, are innocent and defenseless. I think you mean ``wolves thrown to the farmers''...

  19. Bantown! (sung in the Petula Clark style) by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    When your site is down & Livejournal's making you angry
    You can always blame - Bantown!
    When you've got blogs, all the noise and the worry
    Seems to stop, I know - Bantown!
    Just listen to the music of the vulnerable website
    Linger on the domain where the CSS is not right
    You only lose!

    The lags are much longer there
    You can see all your troubles, see all your fear
    So go Bantown! things'll be worse when you're
    Bantown! - no security measures, for sure
    Bantown! - everyone's waiting on you!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  20. Re:What a DANGEROUS thing to do... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    The perpetrators just need to make sure they never visit the victim's parent's basements.

  21. Re:What a DANGEROUS thing to do... by rkanodia · · Score: 2, Funny

    *click*
    *cluck*
    *cluck*
    *cluck*
    *cluck*


    Somehow, I don't think they're going to be very afraid of the mechanical chicken you just activated.

  22. This is Cross Site Scripting by mrkitty · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've written an FAQ on this type of attack which can be found below.
    The Cross Site Scripting FAQ

    --
    Believe me, if I started murdering people, there would be none of you left.
  23. Long Standing Xanga Vulnerability by gasjews · · Score: 2, Informative

    The GNAA Security Center released working exploit code for the Xanga blogging service (which, I might add, predates MySpace by quite a long time, and maybe LJ too).

    This exploit works because Xanga lets users insert Javascript codes into their websites. A malcious user just needs to add the code to their "Look and Feel" control panel and then the Javascript code will send the login cookies of anyone who visits their page to a remote server. Xanga has rudimentary JS filtering of "bad" functions but these filters can easily be bypassed by using the document.print method to write out the bad code across several calls (i.e. document.print("");). Xanga knows about the problem but will not fix it.

    This code was used to breach security of several Xanga administrators for many months.

  24. frequent problems by headonfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    since the six apart acquisition and the moving of the data center from seattle to san francisco, livejournal has actually had perpetual technical issues. User pictures being jumbled, comment notification emails broken(this has been a reoccuring one), problems during peak load hours, community comments, and the like. Every day I look on in greater dismay as admin messages telling me something else is broken or having troubles. I like the service enough to pay for it, so I can keep in touch with old friends I've moved away from. But the 6apart and data center swap were terrible, terrible ideas that are degrading service quality inch by emo little inch.

  25. I'm pretty sure they're not bluffing... by metalpet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...about the 16 other XSS attacks.

    I've reported an XSS flaw exploitable over IE to LJ over 2 years ago, and the flaw is still exploitable to this day.
    (Yes, the email report was read by the right folks over at LJ.)

    I'm slightly overdue to send them my yearly reminder, I think. (I should probably set up a cron job for that.)

  26. And now, by Council · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cue the 500 posts about "haha, sucks for those Livejournal-using emo fucks" which help (a) put me off of Slashdot for a few days, and (b) obscure the actual information about how I should secure my account or what vulnerabilities these break-ins made use of.

    I'm taking a deep breath and trying not to get in an argument with the "Livejournal is stupid" crap that will get modded funny. Just be aware that it gets on the nerves of those of us who use it, and there will inevitably be posts by people defending LJ, and then ridiculous anti-LJ evangelizing posts (as if anyone commenting on Slashdot doesn't know their way around blogs).

    If you're posting anti-LJ jokes, please try to make them funny. And if you see useful information about the exploits, mod it up.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  27. Mod up. by painandgreed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd mod you up if I had points. I'm almost 40 and use LJ for everything from keeping up with family to seeing who wants to go out for sushi after work. It's a place where my old friends can check up to see what I've been doing and check it again later if they forget. It serves some functions much better than email or phone.

  28. Re:Easy to tame the dogs by PastAustin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The title of a post on that blog was: zomg Gr0w UP

    Here is the text:

    This is the most immature thing evar and I am glad to be no part of it. I am so sad when I see internet abused this way.

    You terrar faggots should stop flying your pooplanes(?!) into the lj towers before we get mad and invade your butts(?!?!?!?!). like you are an iraq we will be up there in your anustowns. thank you


    I'm not going to complain about anyone's typing on /. ever again... My god... Talk about immature.
    --
    Firefox 2.0 - Spell Rightly.
  29. Re:Hack This Sight by PastAustin · · Score: 2, Informative
    I have a sight for them to hack: www.yafro.com

    Imagine a photo blog with the mental age of 12, but the environment of a singles bar and the insecurities of all attention whores concentrated in one place. Shouldn't happen, should it? Well it has and it's called Yafro. Please h4x0r this sight friendly hackers. ;P



    I think your sight is already hacked because you're too blind to realize that sight and site are two different things. Any just because they're pronounced the same doesn't mean they are the same thing. It's like son and sun.

    Saying I wasn't going to complain anymore was a lie. I may start complaining more actually.
    --
    Firefox 2.0 - Spell Rightly.
  30. Bantown contact info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bantown kids are notorious troublemakers. #bantown is juped on several EFnet servers and many networks because of their "Banbot", which invites tens of thousands of users to bantown and then kickbans them. They are pretty funny though, and I have enjoyed some of the time I have spent in their channel (when they aren't scrolling ANSI penis and goatse). You can find them at irc.rizon.net #bantown and they have a tollfree contact number at 888-LOL-WHAT. Yes, that number is real and works.

  31. For those curious by cythrawll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those curious what was done with said accounts, they were also used to post a number of comments on the following posts: here here here Look at the comments.