Slashdot Mirror


MacBook is Speedy, but no FireWire 800, Modem Ports

Lam1969 writes "Yuval Kossovsky has a hands-on review of the new 15" MacBook Pro. Besides the speed improvement with the dual-core 1.83-GHz Intel processor, he likes the built-in iSight camera, "MagSafe" power connector, and better WiFi antenna placement, among other features. But he laments the loss of the modem port and FireWire 800 connectors: '[Apple] has taken away by getting rid of the FireWire 800 connector slot and the modem. FireWire 800 was left off the motherboard of the new laptop largely because it has not achieved much a following among users. ... The loss of the modem jack may be a sign of things to come. I was told that Apple had found that 90% of PowerBook owners used the 802.11g AirPort wireless card, gigabit ethernet or a Bluetooth connection to a cell modem to get network access. So for cost and package size reasons, the modem was left out.'" Update: 01/26 17:25 GMT by P : Story and headline updated to clarify that only FireWire 800 was not included on the machine; FireWire 400 is present.

33 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Will the PC card slot go too? by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For that matter, I've also never used the slot for PC cards in my PowerBook. Is the use of these slots common with other owners?

    1. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For that matter, I've also never used the slot for PC cards in my PowerBook. Is the use of these slots common with other owners?

      No - and that's why its gone too, replaced with an ExpressCard/34 slot that can theoretically take in a wider variety of expansion opportunities, as they get developed.

      The main use for an addon card in this or the previous generation of laptops would have been for one of the permanent mobile phone network cards. I'm sure that ExpressCard versions will be forthcoming, as will ExpressCard FireWire 800 ports for those few people who need them.

      Moving the modem external to the main system, and making it optional, just makes sense. Most people I know who travel with their laptops never use them, preferring to drive to a Starbucks (or local equiv.) rather than try to send massive emails over a dialup network.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it answers your question, the iBooks don't have a PCMCIA slot. I haven't missed it a bit. In fact, I'm amazingly happy at not having to worry about damaging whatever dongle is always hanging out of the stupid ports. (I lost an ungodly number of Xircom cards to bent pins. Of course, they weren't very well designed to begin with, but...) If it's important enough, it can connect via USB.

    3. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by lpangelrob · · Score: 2
      Risking my karma, whoever modded what happened to be the first post redundant needs to be shot. So I'll rephrase the post.

      Because (especially at the time integrated Airport came out) most everything that I could've thought of is built into the MacBook/PowerBook, including wireless internet, firewire ports, and 2-3 USB ports, what do people use PC Cards for on Macs?

  2. Still could be a "prototype" by ianscot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A couple of days back we were speculating that maybe the MacBook at Jobs's keynote was more of a prototype, a little more rough around the edges than it should have been. No battery life numbers, and so on.

    Now we get this "hands-on" review, but I'm not convinced anything has changed. He subjectively says the performance "cooks" -- but that's likely just the intel-happy finder. All he has is Apple's oddly vague words to go on about battery performance. The rest of it could have come from the press release about the keynote announcement.

    Book's still out?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  3. Missing Tidbit by creepynut · · Score: 5, Informative

    What the article summary fails to mention is that there is still a Firewire 400 port on the Macbook. They just removed what they feel people aren't using, and that has been Apple's way for as long as I can remember.

    The modem can be taken care of by an optional dongle for the system, and Firewire 800 can be added with an Express Card. If anyone needs either, they're still available.

  4. Not such a big deal by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The loss of the modem jack may be a sign of things to come. I was told that Apple had found that 90% of PowerBook owners used the 802.11g Airport wireless card, Gigabit Ethernet or a Bluetooth connection to a cell modem to get network access. So for cost and package size reasons, the modem was left out.

    The loss of the modem isn't such a big deal. I've only ever used mine once (when I was moving) and it wasn't a pleasant experience. If I'd had a Wifi card, I probably would have gone to a local hotspot instead of bothering with the modem.

    The nice part about the modem being left out, however, is that the Wifi card is included in the base system rather than as an add-on card. IMHO, that's a fair trade. If you really want a modem, Apple has a USB modem as an available option when you order your unit. So I'd say it's a win/win for all involved.

    Unfortunately, I can't speak to the Firewire as I've never used it. Of course, that may be saying more than enough...

    1. Re:Not such a big deal by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I use my modem all the time, I am using it right now. But a USB modem would be ok.

      exactly, if you're using a modem then you're wired down anyway. so what's the big inconvenience between
      phone->laptop , and
      phone->USB->laptop
      ?

      apart from a few dollars and taking up a bit more space in your laptop bag, it's a total non-event.

    2. Re:Not such a big deal by MountainMan101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ( ) Cowboy Neal personally relays my packets.
      ( ) I don't have the internet you insensitive clod (will obviously get zero votes - within error)

    3. Re:Not such a big deal by aduzik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a thought: do you suppose that Apple might be leaving the modem out because they intend an upcoming Apple mobile phone to make the perfect wireless connection accessory? With all the rumor and speculation surrounding Apple launching some kind of wireless communications service in the future, I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's exactly what they're planning. If they make it easy to use, there would be tons of people using a bluetooth modem and not even knowing it.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  5. MacBook pro review by weg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone - including those people who didn't get hold of a MacBook so far - could have written such a review :( He really doesn't come up with anything the informed Mac fan doesn't know already. And I really wonder what it means that the new MacBook is "exponentially faster" than the last G4 version.. having only two measurements, how did this guy manage to interpolate a non-linear function??

    --
    Georg
    1. Re:MacBook pro review by Pendersempai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously he is using "exponentially" to mean "vastly." Yes, you're very smart for knowing the mathematical definition, but you lose some points for feeling the need to prove it.

  6. FW + Modem not such a big deal...to me by richdun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never actually used FW 800, but then again, my camera syncs via USB, and I'm not a pro photo or video guy, so the only time I even used FW 400 was for my 3G iPod. As for a modem, I haven't used one of these in like 5 or 6 years - for most people it'll be okay, though those few travelers who go into areas without broadband wired or wireless (there are still places like this, somewhere, I think), they could find a USB modem, or maybe someone will come up with an Express Card modem, though that seems unlikely.

  7. No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative
    The headline is wrong. The MacBook Pro has Firewire, it just doesn't have FW800.

    It's clear Apple is downplaying Firewire, quite possibly planning to drop it as a standard feature some time in the next few years, but they haven't gone the whole way yet.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I doubt apple is planning on dropping Firewire. 99% of video cameras use Firewire and Firewire only. Very few devices have adopted Firewire 800 though, so very few people use it. Not only that, but Firewire trumps USB 2.0 in every single benchmark that I've ever seen.

      I'm still disappointed that they dropped it though.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  8. Re:No modem! What about no floppy drive? by madaxe42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, damnit, how am I meant to read my core memory now???!? Also, I demand an audio cassette drive! And an LP deck. How dare they remove my perfectly good ancient tech?!

  9. Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by dmoen · · Score: 2, Informative

    One potential use for the MacBook's PC card slot is to add a FireWire 800 port, or a modem port. I've personally never had the use for either on my laptop. The MacBook does have a FireWire 400 port, contrary to the title of the Slashdot article.

    Doug Moen

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
  10. FireWire 800 is missing because... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... Intel's standard chip set doesn't support it.

    It's that simple, Apple had no part to play in that decision.

    1. Re:FireWire 800 is missing because... by ImaNihilist · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not quite that simple. They could have thrown in a third party TI chipset, which is what Intel uses for their FW400 solution IIRC.

      The problem is that, currently, all FireWire controllers are on the PCI bus, even the FW800 controllers. Why is that a problem? Because the FW800 controller can almost completely saturate the entire PCI bus by itself.

      It makes more sense to put it on the PCIe bus, but since no chipset currently exists, why not just leave it out so you can get an ExpressCard 34 that will have FW800 and be on the PCIe bus.

  11. Perfectly reasonable compromises by CharAznable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't used dialup in more than 4 years, and I'm yet to see a Firewire 800 device in the wild. Fw800 is for all intents and purposes, dead as fried chicken. Starting with the retarded, backwards-incompatible connector.

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
  12. They had a part to play... by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could've added their own chip, driving up costs, weight and heat, while decreasing battery lifetime.

    It probably would have also increased the time to market.

    So, they had a part to play, and in this case, they might've made the right decision -- the older laptops w/ FW800 are still on the market, and I would assume that Apple's going to push for support in the future.

    Personally, I don't like FW800, as it uses a completely different connection and cable than FW400, unlike the various USB specs, and the various ethernet specs using RJ45 plugs ... and with a laptop, I don't want to go carrying around even more cables. I would like to see FW800 on the iMac mini, though, so I can get better disk performance than the internal.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:They had a part to play... by cygnus · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's not an Intel motherboard, it's an Intel *chipset*.
      everything i see on the web suggests that that's not the case:
      http://www.macnn.com/articles/05/12/28/intel.power .mac.design/
      http://www.zdnetindia.com/news/hardware/stories/13 2142.html
      http://www.google.com/search?q=apple%20intel%20mot herboard&sourceid=mozilla2&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

      unless you have some other datapoint, i think it's pretty clear it's an Intel motherboard.

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
  13. Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First the modem should be there as it adds very little to the cost and is present in many chipsets. Laptops are about NOT having to carry accessories. While FW800 may be excused as FW400 is there I can't give them a pass on the modem.

    Many times I find the following situation, no wireless and no lan. This means modems. Yeah some hotels have internet I can connect to via lan but that still isn't widespread, or should I say widespread in hotels some business will pay for. Same goes for wireless.

    If I am taking a laptop on business all I should need is the laptop, the power cord, and the case to carry it. I don't want to have a section for "exceptions". If I have one of those then I bought the wrong laptop.

    This is a "PRO" model, by name it implies it will provide me everything I could use that is reasonable. That modem is far more valuable than a gimmick of a camera. Hell I already carry a digital camera around and I am sure I can use it in place of iSight (which seems more suitable to teens playing with IM and IV)

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  14. Re:No modem port...but there are still options by damsa · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had a Sony Vaio SRX without floppy nor a built in DVD drive. It was 2.6 pounds. The newest Sony with a built in Dvd drive weighs in at 3.1 pounds. The lightest Sony full function laptop ever made was 1.8 pounds. So the built drive does make quite a big difference percentage wise in the weight of the laptop. Most computers nowadays come with an image of the software on the hard drive rather than on a disk, so for most people who never buy any software other than ones installed for them, like people who buy iBooks, I can see one day where optical drives would be optional, and you would use a dock connected to a laptop to access this optical drive. Since this would be a dual use, I propose a new name for this Apple laptop without any drives. I propose the name, MacBook Duo.

  15. Indeed by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    And FireWire is going to be around for quite some time.

    As long as all DV and HDV cameras and decks use FireWire for DV transport, FireWire isn't going anywhere on Macs, including "consumer" Macs, since half of iLife (iMovie, iDVD), and the continuing major selling point for the SuperDrive, rest on the ability to get DV into the machine.

    And no, USB isn't a substitute on DV cameras. USB is only included to transfer things from the internal memory card, usually still images and crappy digital-still-camera-like video. To transfer DV, you must use FireWire. (Now, could the industry eventually agree upon a collective standard mechanism for DV video transfer via USB? Will something eventually replace FireWire? Sure. But that's not going to happen for a long time.)

    And indeed, ExpressCard/34 FireWire 800 cards are on the way, for people who really need FireWire 800:

    MacBook Pro #4: FireWire 800 cards for ExpressCard/34 slot on the way

    We previously reported that Apple has opted to omit the FireWire 800 port from its new MacBook Pro line. We also noted that various firms already offer ExpressCard FireWire 800 adapters, but there's a catch -- so far the cards are only available in the 54 mm ExpressCard standard, not the 34 mm standard Apple uses.

    We've now received anonymous word from a major peripheral manufacturer indicating that FireWire 800 cards for the ExpressCard/34 slot are on the way.

    The firm told MacFixIt:

    "We do not have an estimated release date, but we are currently working on a couple of ExpressCard solutions (1394b being one of them). We, like other companies have an ExpressCard/54 cards and all we need to do is down-size them into the ExpressCard/34 form factor

    "We expect to begin testing our cards within the next 2-3 weeks, and if all goes well, we could see production not long afterwards."

    1. Re:Indeed by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

      # FireWire usage across the industry is increasing, not decreasing

      Not as a percentage of market it isn't. There's no evidence that its growth is outpacing that of alternatives in the same market, which is a critical factor in the market.


      "Alternatives"? What alternatives? And all I said was that FireWire usage is increasing. It is. I don't have any figures on percentages. You also must have missed that fact that the High-Definition Audio-Video Network Alliance (HANA) has picked IEEE-1394b as its primary standard to clean up the home HD networking mess. This means more and more equipment that interact with HD equipment from both a video and audio perspective will feature FireWire.

      # FireWire is featured on all currently shipping Intel-based Macs

      Of the two PowerPC Mac models replaced by Intel versions, Firewire has been significantly downgraded in one of them from what it was in the PowerPC equivalent. The other is unchanged and was an older, seven year old, standard anyway.


      Yes. And this was a tradeoff because:

      1. One is a portable machine.

      2. One is a consumer machine.

      And if you call going from 1 FireWire 800 port and 1 FireWire 400 port to 1 FireWire 400 port a "significant downgrade", when we have a representative sample of 2 machines at that, we probably have a different definition of "significant downgrade".

      This was also a tradeoff because none of Intel's chipsets have FireWire 800 support, and Apple is trying to stay as vanilla as possible in terms of usage of Intel processors and support chipsets. Yes, it could have added its own chipset for FireWire 800 support, at the sacrifice of price, heat, space, design cost, and other factors. And for what? The extremely small penetration that FireWire 800 has? FireWire is still there. That's what is important.

      # FireWire is increasingly used as the interface of choice on modern digital video and audio equipment

      False. In the consumer market, modern digital video is moving to HDMI and was rarely, if ever, found in Firewire form. Modern digital audio has pretty much completely changed over to SPDIF. Firewire is pretty much only used for transfering video between DV cameras and computers outside of the commercial sector.


      Nope. And I also should probably say "high end" in there, too. But again, you missed HANA. And since HANA's founding members include Charter Communications, Mitsubishi, NBC Universal, Samsung, Sun, ARM, Freescale, and Pulse-LINK, they'll definitely be a force in the industry.

      And you also have forgotten that ALL HD set top boxes distributed to customers after July 1, 2005, MUST include a functional FireWire port, per FCC rulemaking. That's more and more FireWire out there every day, and FireWire is a transport that makes sense for simply handling data transport and control between many devices.

      # FireWire is the transport mechanism used by all digital video (DV) and high definition digitial video (HDV) cameras and decks

      The fact you said this means that you clearly didn't mean DV camera usage was to be included in the previous "fact". How many DVD players, video cassette recorders, high definition TVs, and TV receivers, available at regular chains like Best Buy, Circuit City, or even Radio Shack, have Firewire inputs or outputs again? This is the one fact that appears to be largely correct.


      And DV/HDV cameras/decks is a fairly, um, huge marketplace, wouldn't you say?

      And let's just pause here for a second - that so many people have settled for HDMI and S/PDIF is really unfortunate. I don't know if HANA will ultimately succeed, but they certainly have a lot of weight to throw behind fixing the current mess.

      Even so, it ignores the move towards USB by many companies. Sony already treats Firewire as an option, not a standard feature

    2. Re:Indeed by Captain+Perspicuous · · Score: 2, Informative

      You said:
      And FireWire is going to be around for quite some time

      Dave, isn't it kind of wrong if show proof of your theories by linking to a site that you have written yourself? I just have a strange feeling that something is not quite right there.

    3. Re:Indeed by gobbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You seem to have forgotten Apple's utter dominance in the video editing arena. Even if this is but a small fraction of Apple's total userbase, FireWire will remain on various Apple hardware as an integrated item for quite some time even for those people alone.

      There's a pretty big halo effect to the pro video applications of the Mac, combined with OS X and reliable hardware.

      I and many of my fellow videographers/filmmakers got pretty hooked on FinalCut and the other DV apps for the Mac, especially at the time that running Firewire on a PC in Premiere was extremely flakey. The result? we made more money, lost less hair, insisted on the gear we needed, and infected those around us with similar software addictions. Eventually many of us completely converted our shops over. Bye bye NT etc. and super quirky device drivers! Bye bye forgetting to turn off the virus scanner and dropping frames! There was a MHz lag, the Macs were slower, but less down-time and futzing around more than made up for it, especially when Jaguar came out and we could move to OS X.

      Then I inadvertently demonstrated target disk mode to one of the IT guys: "what the hell are you doing?" "Oh, just needed to synch home folders." "Wow, cool. Woah, fast!" There were quite a few Mac orders next budget cycle. Apple relies on the "creative types" for more than just sales.

      Firewire was the key to all that.

  16. Re:why didn't they try to install windows? by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd have to disagree here. There are probably a HUGE amount of people out there who would switch from PC to Mac only if there was a simple way to maintain backward-compatibility with all their Windows games and programs. Right now, when you buy a Mac as your sole computer, you're basically giving up PC gaming completely (except for World of Warcraft, that is). Not to mention all the proprietary VB stuff that many companies use.

    A VM sounds nice, but I can't see how it would be any easier to make a VM for OSX than it is for x86-Linux, and the existing x86-Linux emulators (or translation layers or whatever) are far from perfect. I don't want WINE for Mac, I want Windows!

    It may have little to do with Apple's "plans" for the system, but dual-booting to Windows would be a HUGE selling point among the gamer and geek crowds. If this is a white whale, it's got some darn valuable blubber.

  17. Tiny USB modem by kherr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple's USB modem is tiny, smaller than an iPod shuffle. I'm sure you'll also be able to get an ExpressCard modem (so it can be "in" the machine and not an extra part to carry). Sure people still need modems, but the number of those using them is shrinking. And since there's a reasonable external solution why continue to build it into the machine?

    While many modem users may be shocked by the lack of a built-in modem, this move is probably less radical than it seems, just like ditching the floppy drive. Everyone couldn't imagine a machine without a floppy, but it didn't hurt Apple at all. I think replacing the PC Card slot with an ExpressCard slot is much more extreme, since that obsoletes hardware people have.

  18. How fast is it by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder: can I see this MacBook Pro as a notebook version of the iMac, or are there significant differences in speed?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  19. If you want the modem, just buy it by vitaflo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple does sell a USB modem. If you need one, you can always buy it with your MacBook.

  20. The modem is like insurance by AlanAudio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having a modem is like having insurance, you hope not to need it, but when you find that you do need it, you're very glad of it.

    Now I'm the first to admit that I rarely use the modem in my PowerBook, but nearly every time that I have used it has been when I expected some sort of broad band service to have been available. If all else fails, you can get a dial-up connection almost anywhere and you can borrow a lead to connect from the local telephone point to a modem too.

    My PowerBook has to be squeezed into space with other important stuff. It's simply not practical to take all my accessories with me. The chances are that if I needed a USB modem, it wouldn't be with me, but a built-in modem is always there when you need it.

    I like the PCMCIA slots. I've always kept a compact flash reader in mine. If I take a photograph and want to see it on a larger screen, it's easy to pop the card straight onto the PowerBook, you don't need to find that strange USB adaptor lead that came with the camera. As the card reader lives entirely within the slot, you'd hardly know it was there - until you unexpectedly want it.

    An ExpressCard slot would be equally acceptable for me, a card reader would almost certainly live in there. But it wouldn't be suitable for a modem as the slot is only 5mm high and if you need to use the modem unexpectedly, the card is unlikely to have a standard phone socket, so you'll still need a special lead, which you probably won't have with you.

    I think that the lack of a modem is something that has come from people who move from home to office and on to smart hotels, with WiFi in Starbucks and GPRS for other places. They assume that users spend all their time in the city and never travel to rural areas, or even ( dare I say it ? ) travel abroad !

    For some of us who live in the real world, the lack of a modem is a very serious omission.