Slashdot Mirror


Africa, The MMOG

Via Joystiq, an MTV Games story about a MMOG that attempts to encompass Africa in a game. From the article: "Less reserved, Adam Ghetti, the teenage creative director at Rapid Reality, the company actually creating the game, said he hopes the game will right some wrongs. 'The white American board developers of the large MMO development companies out there right now don't honestly have the right background and knowledge on the continent of Africa and its lore, mythology and rich history, and quite honestly neither did I,' said Ghetti, who is white. 'They just don't teach it over here.' The game is designed, in part, to change that."

110 comments

  1. Hmm... by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    It better run on Ubuntu!

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      How could it not?

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  2. factions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Which faction will you roll your character as Tutsi or Hutu?

    Ah, PvP!

    1. Re:factions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pvp system is more likely to be some FFA variant, though..

  3. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...what level do you have to be to get into the "Slave trader" alignment?

  4. Heart of Africa by suso · · Score: 1

    Anyone here remember the game "Heart of Africa" from the 80s? I thought it was a pretty good game for learning the physical geography of Africa.

  5. If its done right... by MrTester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this could be a great thing.

    When I was a teenager I read a lot of fantasy, until I realized that 99.9% of the fantasy genre is taken directly from Tolkein. The same can be said about fantasy games. Its all Knights, Wizards, Orks, Elves, Dwarves and Dragons. Maybe they will mess with the names, but the roles are set in stone.

    Anything realizeing a vision of its own would be a welcome change.

    Not that any of that will help a crappy implimentation...

    1. Re:If its done right... by qw(name) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tolkien didn't create all the races found in his books either. He was a giant who stood on the shoulders of lesser known giants.

    2. Re:If its done right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolkien didn't create all the races found in his books either. He was a giant who stood on the shoulders of lesser known giants.

      But under those giants, it's orcs all the way down..........

  6. background by AequitasVeritas · · Score: 0, Troll

    i got all the background i ever wanted to know, or didnt as the case may be, by watching Hotel Rawanda. i see this game failing miserably.

  7. Re:Mmmmmkay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > And the only sound to be heard for miles was the sound of crickets chirping.

    No, because if that were the case, then there'd be no famine.

    /one ticket to hell, please. someone had to say it.

  8. This does not sound good... by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The average cycle on MMOs is two to four years," he said. "We can turn out the same content, better graphics, better gameplay in eight months to a year." He said games from his company, including "Africa," will have graphics that surpass the current industry gold standard of the Unreal Engine 3. When he talks about the ability for every computer-controlled character in "Africa" to react uniquely to each human-controlled character, he scoffs at prospective doubters. "They say it's impossible. Maybe if we were doing it in the archaic way everyone else tries to do it."
    Uh-huh. Yeah, sure. Whenever anyone makes such wild claims, you can be certain that they will blow it. This game will be either full of bugs or delayed for years.
    1. Re:This does not sound good... by jdray · · Score: 1

      You forgot the possibility of it being slow as Hell* because it's doing just what it's designed to do, but doesn't have enough horsepower behind it to deal with the load.

      * No, I don't know what the relatavistic speed of Hell is, I'm just using an American idiom.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:This does not sound good... by CFTM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My initial impulse is to agree with you, but sometimes someone really does have a better way of doing things. Robert Rodriguez [Sin City] said the same thing with his movies and he ended up being correct.

    3. Re:This does not sound good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like they're planning to release it on the Phantom Console to me.

  9. Africa by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think one of the issues that we (Americans) have is that you normally hear of "Africa." It is the only continent that is mentioned as a country (aside from the obvious Australia which is a country, or Anarctica, which has no countries). I don't think people(in general) realize that Africa is made up of distinct countries with distinct cultures.
    Then again, many of my country men can't name 10 state capitals in the US... so maybe understanding other cultures is too much...

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:Africa by lythandesi · · Score: 1

      I disgree: I would bet almost everyone who has some kind of formal education can make the distinction. Also, not knowing 10 state capitals in a foriegn country is far far worse than not recgnoizing Africa is a continent made up of many countries.

    2. Re:Africa by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      aside from the obvious Australia which is a country

      Well, we (the rest of the world) let them think that. ;-)

    3. Re:Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      At least I know that countrymen is one word.

      Perhaps you are not so superior to those you feel the need to denigrate.

      I don't think of Africa in the way you ascribed me, why do you generally assume others do?

    4. Re:Africa by MMaestro · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Its because Africa is more or less the black sheep of history really. With the exception of Japan and Russia, nearly every single major imperial/regional/military power in history has exploited Africa at one time or another (slave trade, colonies, subjugation of local population, civil wars, colonial wars, 'border disputes', 'skrimishes', colonial fighting during World War I and II, etc.) No political group/government/nation really wants to get involved with Africa since it'll open up a lot of old historical wounds.

      U.S. won't touch it since African American sentiments are still touchy especially in the South. Britain more or less wants nothing to do with Africa (usually due to monetary and military cost), same with Russia, China and Japan. Germany is too restricted to help effectively and France has been giving the finger to everyone lately. Italy, Spain, Canada, Australia, Mexico; too weak or lack of interest for whatever reason. The U.N. has been working in Africa but we all know how much of a failure that is (Somalia is still a battleground with the withdrawal of U.S. troops, genocide is CURRENTLY being committed in Darfur, Egypt is tangled in Middle East affairs, theres the widespread AIDS crisis, etc.)

    5. Re:Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, just the other day my girlfriend complained that her sister — who has a high school degree, but not a college degree — asked her whether Africa was a continent or a country.

    6. Re:Africa by xilmaril · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent poster meant that he knew americans who couldn't name 10 state capitals in america. And that wouldn't really surprise me, since I've been hearing similiar reports for years.

    7. Re:Africa by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you- But look at the number of high school graduates in some areas of our country... It is sadly low... Plus, check this out... If 11% of American kids can't find the US on a World Map, well....
      From the nation Geographic Article (exerpts)
      About 11 percent of young citizens of the U.S. couldn't even locate the U.S. on a map. The Pacific Ocean's location was a mystery to 29 percent; Japan, to 58 percent; France, to 65 percent; and the United Kingdom, to 69 percent.
      In a nation called the world's superpower, only 17 percent of young adults in the United States could find Afghanistan on a map, according to a new worldwide survey released today.
      Despite the threat of war in Iraq and the daily reports of suicide bombers in Israel, less than 15 percent of the young U.S. citizens could locate either country.
      Read more at... http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/11/11 20_021120_GeoRoperSurvey.html

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    8. Re:Africa by moranar · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I think one of the issues that we (Americans) have is that you normally hear of "Africa." It is the only continent that is mentioned as a country

      Interesting. Especially the part where you refer to a whole continent (America) as if it was just one country (The USA).

      Try again, better luck next time :)

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    9. Re:Africa by JVert · · Score: 1

      American's come from america. We do this because our name (USA) kinda means united states of america.

      I wish no luck on your future jabbing at other postings, but I reccommend you not try so hard.

    10. Re:Africa by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      "Americans" means from the United States of America.... The same as French means from France. North Americans however, would refer to people from the continent of North America. There is nothing worse than a smug idiot. If you are going to insult someone, don't be incorrect....
      asshat

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    11. Re:Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. ???
      5. Profit!

    12. Re:Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America has this to say:

      America is usually meant as either:
              * The Americas, the lands between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, usually subdivided into:
                          o North America
                          o South America
              * The United States of America
              (See Use of the word America and Use of the word American.)
      America is also:
              * America, Netherlands in Limburg
              * America, a part of the parish of Sutton-in-the-Isle in Cambridgeshire, England

      The lesson: Just because YOU use a word one way, doesn't mean it's the ONLY way.

    13. Re:Africa by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      Owned by an AC :o

    14. Re:Africa by moranar · · Score: 1

      Oh yes? I come from Argentina. It's in America. You know, the continent. When "USians" refer to themselves as "americans" I think "well, what are all the other americans? chopped liver?" This, compounded with a very aggressive diplomatic policy (past and present, for the last 200 years), makes many people angry. Thought I'd just point it out.

      Of course, this might have to do with the fact that being called "USian" sucks ass. Which is not my problem. I didn't usurp the name of the continent.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    15. Re:Africa by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      He defined America(s) you dumb fuck, not American...
      Have you ever heard a Brazilian or a Canadian defined/described as an Amercian? Are you that stupid?
      Owned by an AC? It is obvious that you posted as an AC, and then replied to yourself. Eat a dick. And then take it out of your mouth and stick it in your ass.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    16. Re:Africa by moranar · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard a Brazilian or a Canadian defined/described as an Amercian?

      Yes. Outside of the USA, I've heard people, songs, and other concepts referred to as "american" meaning "of the american continent". Especially in the 70's and early 80's, but after that too. Take it as "of the american continents", if you wish. As I said, there _are_ people who don't really like the USians refer to themselves as "Americans". It doesn't surprise me that you don't want to accept it, only the violence with which you try to answer.

      And of course, insulting people will obviously make your point be true and right, so keep it up.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    17. Re:Africa by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      And let me guess. You told here it was a planet. So she will never know that it is really an ocean.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re:Africa by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      Haha. Sadly your paranoia is unfounded. My own comment wasn't all that serious, and I don't think you should be taking it (or the smartassed AC comment before mine) too seriously. Really, there are more important things to be worried about in life.

    19. Re:Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat a dick you sack of shit. Everyone knows that you posted that comment. Leave my man Alex P alone...

  10. What's the... point? by infiniter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The things most worth talking about in Africa are unfortunately pretty nasty... things like ethnic cleansing and the yearly starvation of hundreds of thousands. Somehow I don't think that's what they have in mind here...

    It looks like the goal is more something along the lines of stereotypical Africa... a lot of elephants and odd piercings. That, somehow, doesn't seem educational either.

    I'm just confused. It's to be a fantasy game, but it's still somehow supposed to teach about Africa? Did anyone learn about Europe from LOTR? Raise your hands, now...

    1. Re:What's the... point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have watched too much CNN and read too little books. Brainwashed.

    2. Re:What's the... point? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think *you* are the point of making a game like this.

      Africa is a friggin' continent, for god's sake, several times larger than the US, with a lot (!!) more history. I am assuming you are from the US, here, for reasons that should be obvious. If, all over Africa, there were nothing other than millions starving to death or dying of AIDS, if everyone were killing everyone else, it would be a complete wasteland within the decade. And it's not. Mythology might be heavily animal-based, but so it is with American Indians. Not surprising, when you're living among so damn many of them.

      As for your jibe concerning LOTR, there's a difference to fantasy in an imaginary world, like LOTR, Krull or Star Wars, and fantasy based on mythology, like American Gods, Chronicles of Narnia or even The Iliad. Fantasy has many levels. If you look at Neil Gaiman's books, they tend to be about our world, with legends and mythology made flesh. Something like that would work well in 'the cradle of humanity'.

      The execution of the whole deal would be tricky, though, you're right. It's too easy to fall into triteness, rather than actual interesting cultural exchange.

    3. Re:What's the... point? by jdray · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This may be something of a troll, but since Africa is a continent, as you point out, you should compare it in size to North America, which is also a continent, rather than America, which makes up some fraction of North America.

      I have to say that my elementary school education regarding Africa was spotty, and completely non-existent in high school, except for the "cradle of civilization" part. As a teen (many years ago), I could have told you that Egypt was a part of Africa, and that the Congo was, but had little or no idea what relationship they had to one another, either socially or geographically. South Africa is obviously in the southern part, and there was plenty of news about Apartheid at the time, but I had no clue what any of it meant.

      In my adult life, I'm happy to say that I've had (still have, in some cases) several friends from different parts of Africa. I know how to find The Gambia on a map (not so easy), and quite a bit about the culture of Ghana (fascinating place). Unlike most Americans, I know that Ethiopia is not primarily a desert full of starving poor people.

      There's so much about the world that doesn't fit into eight second sound bites, and much of it is only interesting after you've spent time learning about it, which is to say that it takes time to get enough of a picture to understand what's going on. If half of America knew as much about the cultures of this world as they do about what Paris Hilton does in her bedroom, we'd all be better off.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:What's the... point? by know1 · · Score: 0

      "Did anyone learn about Europe from LOTR? Raise your hands, now.." uh no. maybe because lotr was set in a fictional place called middle earth. tolien may have took english (yorkshire to be precise) sounding names, but they were only loosely based on real places - not actually based on them. be thankfull i didn't mod you down...i'm assuming that due to your lack of education you are american, so let it slide and decided to reply instead ;|

    5. Re:What's the... point? by Repton · · Score: 1

      Africa is a friggin' continent, for god's sake, several times larger than the US, with a lot (!!) more history.

      That's right --- why, Africa had been up and running for millions of years before they even got around to laying the bedrock for the US!

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    6. Re:What's the... point? by infiniter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's correct, Africa is a friggin' continent. So's North America. Can you imagine trying to create a single game that captures North America? It's a silly concept.

      Why does everyone not from America assume that every American is completely ignorant of the rest of the world? You can complain about America in as many ways as you like, but the fact remains that our humanitarian efforts for the rest of the world outweight the contributions of every other country on Earth combined. As soon as your country exceeds, say, the many billions of dollars that America has put towards fighting AIDS in Africa, let's talk about my ignorance.

      I'm not saying there's nothing more to Africa than its problems. However, video games require a conflict in order to be interesting. I don't mean violent conflict - I mean there has to be a problem to be solved or else it's just a screensaver.

      The unfortunate fact that I'm trying to convey is that the majority of the civilized world is going to look at an MMO based on a mythology they've never heard of, shrug, and walk away.

      To actually educate about Africa, now, for real, absolutely requires a treatment of the problems there.

    7. Re:What's the... point? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Oh I dunno.
      I hear Kenya has lions and tigers.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    8. Re:What's the... point? by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      From the article I got the impression that it was primarily educational. If this is so, then I really doubt the game will take off. I can only see it being used in schools.

  11. Jilting at windmills by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1) Africa is a big place with hundreds of different languages and cultures. No single artwork could possible "encompass Africa", it can only try to present a small representative sample.

    2) The designer of the game claims both that it will have state of the art graphics and that it will run on low-end computers. Sorry, but you can't do both at the same time! Also, much of the gameplay that works great when you're on the same Ethernet segment as the server is virtually unplayable when you're on a dial-up on a different continent than the server.

    In general, you can't be all things to all people; you need to pick your battles and focus on doing just a few things, but doing them well.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Jilting at windmills by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The designer of the game claims both that it will have state of the art graphics and that it will run on low-end computers. Sorry, but you can't do both at the same time!

      I'm not sure I agree with that compleatly. I've noticed that over the last ten years, graphics hardware has evolved at a much higher rate then graphics itself, something I've attributed to a propensity to develop software graphics engines that are bloated and inefficent. In the span of 18 months, the raw power of a graphics card may double, yet the quality of the graphics output from the software may increase only 15-20% in the same period of time.

      It's a trend I see in every aspect of computer hardware. For example, in 1995 I had a computer with an 80 meg HDD. The driver for the ethernet device in the latest motherboard I purchased was 35 megs. I highly, highly doubt that the network capabilities of my new computer really requires a jump from a few K to drive the device up to 35 megabytes; I simply think that the party that designed the driver produced a bloated driver because it was. . . well, easier.

      I think, based on my observations, that software designers use the dramatic increases in performance of hardware to compensate for increasingly large and inefficent code. Why spend countless man hours to develop a lean, mean peice of software when you can throw a ton of stock code, make a few adjustments, and have a working peice of sofware with a noticable increase from previous generations.

      If hardware development stopped today. . . if CPUs and GPUs stopped getting faster and faster, and we were forced to get every ounce of performance out of our computers, I don't see how it would be a major difficulty in expect that graphics would continue to improve as programmers were required to be efficent as well as talented. And I think if a software developer built a graphics engine from the ground up with efficenancy as the opperitive word, we could get higher end graphics on older systems.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Jilting at windmills by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      To be fair, graphics quality isn't like network throughput. You can't really say, "this screenshot is 20% better than that one." Things like bump-mapping and dynamic lighting may make only a small improvement in image quality but requires, to pull a number out of my ass, 3x the processing power.

      Also, the bloated or slow code is a tradeoff. Maybe they traded it to get proper error handling or graceful degradation or to make it more easily extensible (unlikely). Maybe they traded it to get it into your hands a year earlier (likely). Even if you don't realize it, you are seeing a benefit from these tradeoffs (unlikely), unless you're dealing with a crap company (likely).

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:Jilting at windmills by robnauta · · Score: 1
      It's a trend I see in every aspect of computer hardware. For example, in 1995 I had a computer with an 80 meg HDD. The driver for the ethernet device in the latest motherboard I purchased was 35 megs. I highly, highly doubt that the network capabilities of my new computer really requires a jump from a few K to drive the device up to 35 megabytes; I simply think that the party that designed the driver produced a bloated driver because it was. . . well, easier.

      Drivers nowadays are usually unified packages, composed of utilities and dozens of drivers for the hundreds of possible cards using the components. Nowadays if you have a VIA chipset or nVidia 3D card you just download one big driver and install, the installer will decide whether you need the TNT2, Geforce 2 GTS or Ti4200 files. That's a lot better than the old daysm when you took out your network card, saw that it was a 1234 chipset, booted, downloaded a driver, noticed it doesn't work, then found out that you had a 1234-B revision 3. Then you downloaded that one and then noticed that it was for the coax version and that you needed the combo drivers because you had both coax and UTP. All of those variations and revisions had their own drivers, sure they might be small but it was just a pain.

  12. Potential.... by ELProphet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seeming to be a comon thread amongst MMOG's these days (Star Trek, Star Gate...), this looks like it has tremendous potential. I truly hope that this project succeeds in all the areas that the spunky 19-year old developer hopes. If this goes well, perhaps we may see some other games in this genre; Pre-columbian Native Americans, Han-dynasty China, Shogun-era Japan. I could see this becoming a major franchise. As for that 19 year-old head, I just wish I had a company to help me put my game ideas to code...

  13. Y0 NEED PARTY! by Stavr0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    CONNECT: SteveOkembo72
    SteveOkembo72 waves.
    SteveOkembo72> HAV3 10M GPS IN DUNGEON. NEED SOME1 TO /GIVE SOME GP TO UNLOCK CHEST
    SteveOkembo72> WILL SHARE LOOT 50% WIT U.
    SteveOkembo72 waves.
    SteveOkembo72> MSG ME. KTHXBYE

    1. Re:Y0 NEED PARTY! by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      asdbhsadbfahahahahahahahaha

  14. Looking for Group... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

    To do the Heart of Darkness quest. Willing to split silver that the yellow cons and up drop.

    1. Re:Looking for Group... by Poietes · · Score: 1

      ... to do the Heart of Darkness quest. Willing to split silver that the yellow cons and up drop.

      The horror, the horror.

  15. Re:I'm sorry... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

    !Xabbu and his girlfriend finally got out of Otherland and into business. ;)

    More seriously, if it works the way !Xabbu's was in the book, it could actually be educational.

  16. wtb [Heart of Political Dissident] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cannibal despots FTW!!!

  17. Why do I get the feeling... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    ...that it will turn out to be some over romanticized vision, and will be about as accurate as the Mars (Barsoom) of John Carter?

    Oh, that's right. I a total cynic. That's why. Never mind.

  18. I wish the author well by Jakuta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Africa, from an inside flavor. This will be interesting to see and i for one am going to be expectant of the views presented. Will this be of the time of Egypt? Will it cover the Congo and Llukumi existance and history of the west coast? The Ethiopia, Swahili and Zulu nations of the east coast? There are a number of pantheons and diverse cultural histories to be represented either correctly or fictitiously. Perhaps crickets are not all that would be heard and maybe you might learn something about Africa from the game, unlike LOTR which was not set in europe....

    1. Re:I wish the author well by Jakuta · · Score: 1

      Oh and just for fun Jakuta is an African preternatural being

    2. Re:I wish the author well by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Swahili is not really a "nation", it's a language. Mostly a lingua franca. With hundreds of different languages/'nations'/peoples in East Africa, they needed a common language, and Swahili is that. There are over 50,000,000 speakers but almost all of them are second language speakers - the actual number of people who speak Kiswahili as a first language are probably less than 2,000,000. (Also there are a number of different Swahili dialects and regional variations.)

      I don't see how it would be feasible to write a game that is truly representative of Africa, as Africa is extremely diverse, with dozens of countries and literally thousands of different languages and ethnic groups (over 3000 languages and possibly as many as 8000 dialects). Also what about the parts of Africa that are modernised and 'first world', like many parts of South Africa ... will those be left out? Wouldn't that simply then continue to give a "skewed" stereotypical depiction of Africa as an undeveloped and simple place?

      (Just an interesting side note: the name of Apple's web browser, Safari, is actually a Swahili word meaning "journey" or "travels". It itself comes from an Arabic word 'safar' for journey.)

    3. Re:I wish the author well by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to instancing King Soloman's Mines; That dude's got some phat lewtz. Gotta remember to bring my rifle though!

  19. Realism in Africa MMOG by zzz1357 · · Score: 1
    Am I correct in assuming that this will be a PvP game?

    Foreign powers killing natives, natives repelling the foreign powers, natives killing each other. This could be a really cool game.

    --
    You can't add pianos and telephones.
    1. Re:Realism in Africa MMOG by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Foreign powers killing natives, natives repelling the foreign powers, natives killing each other.

      Foreign powers offering natives guns in exchange for slaves, and suggesting that since they'll be back in a few months' time, it might be worth the natives' while going and enslaving the village over the hill, who haven't got guns...

      Ah, I'm just swelling with patriotism at the thought of Britain's glorious history ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  20. Derek Smart, PhD* by fujiman · · Score: 1

    Dr. Smart, I presume?

  21. Rapid Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mmorpg.com/showFeature.cfm/loadFeature/ 122

    What happened to these other 4 games? And are those graphics and sketches indicative of their "better than UE3" quality? I know I would invest in a company of 20 people led by inexperienced teenagers who are planning to unveil multiple MMORPGs at once with bad art and generic ideas!

    After all, those talentless saps at Blizzard had to use over 200 employees just to get their little game off the ground!

    Seriously though, something doesn't add up here. Creative directors are usually not very young because experience is a GOOD thing. New ideas are great, but ideas can only get you so far. The most important thing in any large undertaking (like creating the most complicated type of game available) is knowing how to schedule, how to pace, how to get your work done on time and under budget (or as close as you can manage!). That old adage about perspiration over inspiration has endured because there is a lot of truth to it.

    On top of that, exactly how is such a tiny team going to produce such amazing assets? Where did they get the funding to either buy or create technology that supports normal mapping and tone mapping in an upgradeable and portable way? Where is their customer support team? Where did these "8 months to a year" numbers come from? Not from some tawdry thing like "experience" I imagine...

    After Gizmondo and Infinium, articles and interviews like one this start to leave a sour taste in my mouth...

  22. Where have I head that before..... hmmm... by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    s/Africa/Duke Nukem Forever/g
    s/Rapid Reality/3DRealms/g
    s/Adam Ghetti/George Broussard/g

    Oh, right! I knew that sounded familiar...

  23. Beats my education on Africa by RingDev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slaves came from Africa. Anglo-saxon men are bad.

    What I wouldn't give for a Multi-Cultural class that actually studied different cultures instead of how the white Anglo-saxon male has subjugated them.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Beats my education on Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, while the Anglo-saxons are the most well known part of the slave trade (particularly since, as the cultural forebearers of Europe and America their history tends to show quite a bit, and since their impact was more pronounced on the fabric of African society), the Arabian slave trade from East Africa to the Middle-East and India started earlier and culminated in tens of thousands of people a year being transported into slavery.

      Personally the growth of Islam as a religion among african americans is something I am still baffled by. How can a group that embraces its racial memory that it was oppressed and taken into slavery, at the same time turn to the religion of one of its greatest enslavers? (but then religion is a personal matter, that each person needs to decide on their own).

    2. Re:Beats my education on Africa by ShaneThePain · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're a racist.

      --
      Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
    3. Re:Beats my education on Africa by jdray · · Score: 1

      I think the term you were looking for is satirist.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:Beats my education on Africa by RingDev · · Score: 1

      No, that was the education that was presented to me by both my Female Native American high school Multi-Cultural Literature teacher, and the teacher from my Multi-Cultural Studies class (online, no idea on the teachers race, but she is a woman).

      Me personally, I LOVE to study foreign cultures. I spent time in foreign exchange after highschool, I got stationed over seas in the military, I enjoy literature and documentaries about foreign cultures.

      What I don't like is the "education" I have received from organized schools about multiculturalism. Both of the classes I took we focused on the oppression of those societies by white men, instead of taking a look at the beauty of their cultures.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    5. Re:Beats my education on Africa by michaelnz · · Score: 1
      What I wouldn't give for a Multi-Cultural class that actually studied different cultures instead of how the white Anglo-saxon male has subjugated them.

      Why not both? A class that ignores the effects of western colonialism would be just as useless as the one that focuses solely on it. If it's a Cultural Studies class that focuses on the present day situations it would be a huge oversight to ignore the effects of colonialism on cultures. Look at the number of countries that now speak English, French or Spanish. Or the british crown countries that play cricket or soccer. Or the institutions, both legal and cultural, that now exist as a result of "Anglo-Saxon" colonialism/subjugation/influence. This isn't bad, the story of colonialism is frequently one of cultural perseverance, adaptation, growth and strength. It's an important story and it deserves to be told.

      Seems like the best class would be a balanced but not to ignore the effects of western colonialism just because it makes you feel bad for some reason.

    6. Re:Beats my education on Africa by RingDev · · Score: 1

      A very valid point. I guess I've just been stuck through so many "history of racism" classes/lectures, I'm a bit fed up with it.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  24. Can Anyone Say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Vaporware? Seriously, how was the developer's description of all the "neat stuff" any different from the Microsoft press machine. I see this project's schedule slipping until it is finally laid to rest.

  25. I get it! by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Adam Ghetti is Swahili for "Derek Smart".

    I bet this is the last MMOG anyone will EVER own.

    --
    -Styopa
  26. More like eight months to a lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The concept of using Africa's rich and extremely DIVERSE history as the basis for a game is a great idea. But yeah, he's setting his hopes too high in promising to encapsulate all of it effectively. It reminds me of that World War II simulation MMO game that turned out to be a total failure (mostly due to a rushed and buggy initial release). To create a game like Ghetti wants to create, you'd have to spend decades, if not a lifetime, working on it.

    ..."Africa" might give Africans a new window to the virtual world...

    Who says that's such a good thing? Who says they really WANT it? Oh, you American you!

    1. Re:More like eight months to a lifetime by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      Actually that WW2 MMO just got re-released. It's more or less successful.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  27. Looking forward to a new setting by Kaikopere · · Score: 1

    I'm completely burnt on the standard elves and orcs MMO, but unfortunately of all the MMO's I've tried, these seem to have the best game play mechanics for how I like to play. I'd love to see a new MMO that has some depth to it with a different cultural setting. I don't particularly care if it's a romanticized view, so long as it's fun and different.

    Since the game is set in 13th century Africa, I'm assuming "learn something about Africa" means "get the flavor of African mythology". The knight/castle/dragon games and stories aren't an accurate portrayal of medieval times, why should something based on African mythology be held to a different standard? Sure most of present day Africa is a political, economic, and sociological disaster zone. I'm not sure that has anything to do with the mythology of the different African cultures being an interesting setting for a game. I do think it's kind of a big chunk to bite off simply because of the diversity. The geography could make for some beautiful and varied locales to play in though.

  28. Does it come with the deeds to a bridge? by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1

    Here's what the 19-year-old programming wizard responsible for developing this ambitious MMOG promises he'll deliver just 10 months from now, thanks to supposed paradigm-changing technology that reduces development costs and timelines by "ninety percent or more"

    Thanks... I needed the laugh :) Don't really need to read past that.

    Everyone and their dog seems to be trying to make an MMOG. Heck, I have a few ideas of my own and I'd really love having the time and the resources to implement them. The truth is, though, that MMOGs are some of the most complex and difficult software built today... I don't think many people realize that. Add to that the fact that a MMOG lives and dies by how many people it attracts - the _Massively_ Multiplayer part - and... yeah, you can see where this is going.

    Go to the Ogre3D (open-source 3d engine) forums and read all the posts from people saying they're starting their own MMOG project, and does anyone want to help. Take a wild guess what the usual response from the more experienced developers is :p

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
  29. Authentic and historical? by Feanturi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Cool, I want to play a 419 scammer.

  30. Not a bad game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I played the beta, kind of sucked when my character got AIDS though..

  31. It can be new genre - culture-based MMOG by carribeiro · · Score: 0
    Hey, I don't know if the implementation is feasible or not (90% improvements on development?), but the idea is excellent. It can spawn a entirely new genre - culture based MMOGs. For example:
    • A Roman Empire game, with barbarians, roman gods, and intricate politics;
    • Latin America - Aztecs, Mayans, Amazon tribes (they have a rich folklore);
    • A Mongolian horde game, with tribes roaming central Asia and fighting against each other.
    If well done, this kind of game could be a invaluable tool to teach and explore other cultures, their histories and environment. It's a great idea.
  32. Re:Mmmmmkay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That all depends, really. Is that actually the sound of crickets, or does that happen to be locusts?

  33. Not entirely ignorant by Ponzicar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Americans aren't all isolated and ignorant of the world. I've had quite a few friends in Africa that I've been in contact with for a while and am trying to help out. Strangely enough, most of them seem to be relatives of deposed generals in Nigeria trying to get their massive fortunes overseas.

  34. sounds boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this game about ? Sitting in front of your hut all day and wait for the strangers with the trucks full of food, so that you don't have to go out and hunt or farm yourself ? Suppressing the workers in your diamond mine so you can get rich ? Guilds like Hutu's and Tutsi's that slaughter eachother out of pure racism ? I think in the USA people tend to idealize Africa as a kind of paradise, while in fact it's mostly a wretched lethargic continent ruled mostly by brutal dictators.

  35. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just don't include Nigeria.

  36. Nope by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    "It's in America. You know, the continent."

    Sorry smart guy, but there is no continent of "America".

    There is "North America" and "South America", but NO "America".

    Just thought I'd point that out.

    Stop acting like a smug asshole, especially when you're totally wrong.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    1. Re:Nope by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If there is no 'America', then what is 'North America' the 'North' part of?

      If there is no continent of America, then what are the 'United States of America'? United states of a place that doesn't exist?

    2. Re:Nope by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Learn to read, dude. Didn't say "there is no America". Said, "there is no continent named America." And there isn't.

  37. I wonder by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    Could that have anything to do with the fact that so many countries pop in and out of existence in Africa?

    I freely admit that my African geography needs work, but that's mainly because I don't want to bother relearning it every six months.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  38. Learn about Africa, the best way by sita · · Score: 1

    What I wouldn't give for a Multi-Cultural class that actually studied different cultures instead of how the white Anglo-saxon male has subjugated them.

    How about a field trip? I went to West Africa (Senegal and Mali) for four weeks last winter, and while there's a lot to learn, it gave me more understanding -- and more hope -- about Africa than a lifetime of reading news papers and watching the nine o'clock news.

    It was not my first trip to the third world, but it gave me a lot of perspective on things like islam, ethnic strife, development, democracy, desert spreading, colonialism, poverty etc etc. It was a lot different from what you see on tv. Perhaps the most encouraging thing was to see that Mali, the fifth poorest country in the world, was a functioning society. They lacked many basic amenities, but it was not like they were laying in the streets dying all covered in flies. And it is a lot different being told this and seeing it, and discovering the differences and similarities between different societies.

    It gives hope, before I sort of subscribed to the idea that Africa was doomed and just sinking lower and lower into poverty. The picture you get from Western media. It is not true. There is a lot happening, and I do believe that e.g. Senegal will be a new "African tiger" not too long from now, pulling with it neighbouring countries.

    There is a lot to be said to substantiate my beliefs, but the best way is really going there. And, use public transports, you learn a lot by discussing politics with your neighbour in a bush taxi.

  39. Oooh look who though he made a point! by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    "If there is no 'America', then what is 'North America' the 'North' part of?"

    Nothing. It's a continent named "North America".

    "If there is no continent of America, then what are the 'United States of America'? United states of a place that doesn't exist?"

    Then kindly point out the continent of "America" on a map. Shouldn't be too hard.

    And while you're at it, point to "carolina" and "dakota".

    Why is it so hard for you to understand?

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    1. Re:Oooh look who though he made a point! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Nothing. It's a continent named "North America".

      Why would it be called North America if there is no America? You're really not making any sense here. May as well call a place 'North Znvcmnvxcvcx'.

    2. Re:Oooh look who though he made a point! by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "Why would it be called North America if there is no America?"

      It's a NAME. N-A-M-E.

      "You're really not making any sense here."

      Hmm, funny coming from a guy claiming there is a continent named "America". And interestingly, you didn't post any links that show this mystery continent.

      It's a name. There is NO other context.

      I can't figure out if you're really this stupid, or just acting like it for fun.

      And you STILL didn't support your argument, you just keep insisiting that you're right, when EVERY SINGLE INSTANCE OF FACT says you're not.

      Seriously, shut up now. You're making a fool of yourself.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    3. Re:Oooh look who though he made a point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, Shut Up, please

      The term is a relatively recent and less ambiguous alternative to the term America, which may refer to either the entire landmass or the United States of America. The former, and original, usage is now often considered archaic in English-speaking nations but still in use in other areas, in which the Americas is often described as a single continent or supercontinent, and therefore called America (singular).

    4. Re:Oooh look who though he made a point! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's a NAME. N-A-M-E.

      Yes, and the name comes from the continent. Some states were united, that were in America, hence the name 'United States of America'. If the country started in Asia, it would be called the 'United States of Asia'.

      Before the US was formed, the area currently occupied by the fifty states was not known collectively as 'America', that word referred to the whole continent.

      The only reason the US is called 'America' is because the name USA is too long, and the only reason that US citizens are called 'Americans' is because there is no other word to refer to them by.

    5. Re:Oooh look who though he made a point! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Why is it that naive, idealistic comments get modded up, but harsh realistic comments get modded down?
      Because they're not as realistic as they pretend to be?
    6. Re:Oooh look who though he made a point! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Before the US was formed, the area currently occupied by the fifty states was not known collectively as 'America', that word referred to the whole continent.
      No, the continent was and is called "North America".

      I've seen some lame flame wars in my time, but one over a fact that can be checked by looking at a map?

  40. Dude you proved nothing by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    So you think because people like you are too stupid to use the correct names, and instead lump the two ENTIRELY SEPARATE continents into one, that you've proven something?

    Find a current map that agrees. Wikipedia, the source anyone can edit before using as a citation, doesn't count. 400 year old maps don't count either.

    One current, official map. That's it.

    But since such a thing doesn't exist, you can choke on my dick.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    1. Re:Dude you proved nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, read it again:

      The former, and original, usage is now often considered archaic in English-speaking nations but still in use in other areas, in which the Americas is often described as a single continent or supercontinent, and therefore called America (singular).

      The original poster was from Argentina, he was referring to America in a way that is apparently common where he is. It is "archaic" in the U.S, but still used elsewhere. It's not on a current map I kind find without more searching, but it doesn't need to be either. It is a fuctional and recognized way to group the American supercontinent, and that is the way he orignally used it. You're grasping at straws here and in fact, not proving a point at all. You're only proving your own ignorant belligerence.

      More links with this usage: http://www.humanresources.umicore.com/ourPeople/lo cations/america.htm
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14605839&dopt=Abstrac t
      http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3793/i s_199707/ai_n8766976

      If you google '"American Continent" -north -south' you get 240,000 hits. Stop trolling.

  41. Thank you by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    "It's not on a current map I kind find"

    That's all you had to say.

    The rest of your post is a pathetic attempt to explain why it doesn't matter what the REAL name is. I DOn't give two shakes what a bunch of primives call it. Their ignorance, and yours, changes nothing.

    By the way, I love that

    "I can't find a map, but that doesn't matter because, well, because I have to be right"

    I'm going to let you in on something. Ready?

    IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU THINK, OR HOW MANY LINKS YOU POST, NOWHERE ON ANY CURRENT MAP IS THERE A CONTINENT NAMED "AMERICA".

    Refute that, or STFU.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  42. You're the best proof for my point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, when did the original poster who wrote about the American continent mention anything about seeing it on a map? He didn't, that's your ad hoc criteria, and it's bogus. Newsflash, flyinwhitey: IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU THINK, IT'S STILL PERFECTLY CORRECT TO GROUP THE AMERICAS AS THE AMERICAN SUPERCONTINENT. Your map criterion for proving this is logically flawed; there are other ways of naming things other than what is on a map. People call New York the Big Apple, but you won't find that on most maps. HOLY CRAP THOSE PEOPLE NEED TO GET THEIR FACTS STRAIGHT.

    Just because you're wrong doesn't mean you should press this issue further. In fact, it means you should quit. I am, because I don't have anything more to prove.

  43. Tread lightly by Eric+Gamonal · · Score: 1

    I hope the kid making this game doesn't go too far "representing" Africa. The place has some major challenges (AIDS for example), and they are complex: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/9

  44. NO dumbass by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    "So, when did the original poster who wrote about the American continent mention anything about seeing it on a map? He didn't, that's your ad hoc criteria, and it's bogus."

    The names on a map are MY criteria? No, that's THE criteria. If you don't like it, take it up with the cartographers.

    "People call New York the Big Apple, but you won't find that on most maps."

    Right and if someone asked me the NAME of the city, it wouldn't be the Big Apple. I realize you're an imbecile, but even you can understand the difference.

    Your argument says nothing other than "because some people are too ignorant of the CORRECT name, they use an INCORRECT one, and that INCORRECT name should count too".

    But it doesn't. No matter how much you try to claim it does, nothing changes.

    You can't find a single OFFICIAL instance of the TWO SEPARATE continents being called "america". There is NO continetn of America, regardless of what you call it.

    "Just because you're wrong doesn't mean you should press this issue further."

    PROVE I'M WRONG. You say it, but give NO evidence. NONE.

    All you have to do is point to one official source, of credible MODERN cartographers, and I'll buy your stupid argument.

    But you can't.

    "I am, because I don't have anything more to prove."

    You're right. You have no point to prove, so shut up and stop insiting you're right without ONE BIT OF EVIDENCE.

    Latly, I think you're a jackass. By your argument, you ARE a jackass, because that's what I call you.

    Ok, I guess in that case you might have a point.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  45. Uh, he might mean this map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. I see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Spaight-Ghetti production.