Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft to Release 7 Patches Next Week
craters writes "Microsoft plans to release 7 patches next week for Windows and Office. From the article: 'In the monthly pre-patch notification it sends out five days prior to unveiling fixes, Microsoft said that at least two of the seven will be rated Critical, which by the company's definition means that the vulnerability can be remotely exploited.'"
It appears there is a conflict at Redmond. In one case they are fixing a bug which has yet to be discovered, in another they are fixing a bug which has existed for around nine months.
It's about time they came up with a proper strategy other than randomly fixing the bugs they want to fix.
Martin
Ohhhh man... it figures.. right when I had my spyware pickup line down to a science...
Example:
Me: Well maam, I can fix the problem.
Hot Housewife: Great! Whats it going to take?
Me: Well I've been reading some websites on good ways to deal with myWife.
Hot Housewife: mmmmHmmmm
Me: ANd then we'll look and see if I can find my article on Kama Sutra, and get to work.
Hot Housewife: Screw the article.. why don't you just start checking out my ports now!
Please delay this patch for a couple more weeks, until my viagra laden penis enlargment pills and kingly inheritance arrive from my new friends in Nigeria, thus negating my need for cheesy spyware pickup line attempts.
Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
Happy VD from Microsoft!
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words." - PK Dick
Why?
Because on my Windows 2000 system, the size of the patches 33 in number so far, is bigger than the OS itself! And some quaters say 33 is pretty conservative because M$ puts more than one patch in the so called "hot fix" as seen in the Control Panel. I am already afraid, not to mention a patch that might break other software!
Microsoft warned users...
I don't use Windows systems often, but most of my colleagues and friends do. How exactly has Microsoft warned its users? Pop-up windows? Ads in the local paper? Public service announcements on cable television? Are the requirements for Microsoft repairing computer-disabling software bugs the same as, say, General Motor's obligations for repairing automobile-disabling engineering mistakes (e.g. recalls)?
$nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
is the Kama Sutra remover that's no longer of any use now that they've waited so long to release it. Now they're just kicking those 3 infected users while their down. They're basically saying "Now that it's deleted all your documents, here's that removal tool we decided not to release a couple weeks ago, so you wouldn't be bothered with an unscheduled patch release."
Anyone know when the date is when MS will stop making security patches for Windows 2000?
Windows 2000 will be supported for 5 + 5 years since it's an enterprise product. Home level products are supported for 5 + 0 years (except XP Home which got two years more to live.) See http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy for details.
Security updates will be available until Windows 2000 leaves the Extended Support phase of the Microsoft Support Lifecycle. According to http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/search/?sor t=PN&alpha=windows+2000, that's in 2010.
Dude, if the imac is the answer, it must have been a pretty stupid question. I don't want to trade one proprietary system (mostly software) for another (mostly hardware.) If I'm going to leave Windows as my desktop OS, then it's not going to be for another vendor that seeks to limit choice. Which is any vendor.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I don't see what the big deal is, both Linux and MacOS get patched. Some more often than others...
so all of the linux/OSX fanboys and start flaming Microsoft yet again. Sure, they have vulnerabilities in their product, so does everyone else. If anything, being the security professional that I am, Microsoft has made me MONEY over the last few years. BTW, I use linux ALL of the time.
"Give up hope, dreams are for suckers."
Never mind the dozens of patches needed to get MacOS X secure and all the money needed to spend to get a computer that runs it.
As the parent alludes, bustage from patches is precisely why our corporate network admins have disabled automatic updates via group policy.
They download the patches directly and install them on some test machines, and verify that the patches don't actually break anything critical to our business. They then push the patches out to the rest of the corporate network via a software update service. Usually this happens within just a couple of days after Patch Tuesday.
As a local system admin, the bottom line is that I don't usually need to call out sick to defend my sanity. (or what passes for my sanity).
For that, I have this on my door. (I'm close to winning.)
Maybe Microsoft will release updated virus definitions once a month too.
Looks like Microsoft is trying to patch there image.
As I've said several times here before:
:D
I don't have a virus/spyware problem. My XP box has NEVER had a virus or spyware. I don't put a lot of effort into it, it just hasn't picked one up.
Here's what I have:
A NetGear broadband router (buffer against most worms)
Windows Firewall that spends most of its time turned off
AVG Free
AdAware Personal that I scan with irregularly
Spybot and its automatic utilities
AVG, AdAware, and Spybot are almost always the first three things mentioned if you go anywhere on the internet and ask how to secure your XP system. A broadband router is often recommended even by ISPs these days, and provided by SBC DSL as part of the DSL modem (though I use my own because I like it better).
If we flipped Microsoft's market share with Apple or Linux, we'd find out just how many security holes exist in those operating systems. We don't see all the virus and spyware activity for them because there aren't enough in the hands of uneducated users for a virus to propagate. If you want to sell crappy $10 software at Wal-Mart, you write it for the largest number of average users you can. If you want a virus to spread and get noticed, you do the same.
mod this post -1 Unpopular for saying Apple and Linux have security holes
120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
7 reboots.
What?
Seriously though, what's your objection to Windows XP?
I don't know about the original poster... but I like to know that 10 years from now I can install the OS and use it in whatever emulater I'm using at that time. (Right now it is VMWare)
Product activation is a HUGE objection for me. (and not just for some time in the future...)
After paying for an OS I really don't think it is anyone's business how many times I reinstall it, as long as I'm not using it on more systems than licensed for.
And I sure as hell ain't gonna ask permission to use it the way I want...
--Phillip
Can you say BIRTH TAX
Hey dumb ass, before you were even born English (American) used the words "its" for posession and "it's" as a contraction of it is.
NeXTStep is sexy but you if you buy them in any kind of quantity you can get PCs for half what you pay for macs. At least, ones useful for business. The imac is a bitch to even get into (the new one especially) and that's just not supportable if you have more than a handful of machines.
Windows sucks, sure, but I'm not sure OSX on Macintosh is the answer. In fact, I'm pretty sure it isn't.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
CooL...I have automatic updates. Nothing here to see.