Slashdot Mirror


Troubled Times at Gateway

conq writes "BusinessWeek has a piece looking at the future of Gateway in the light of the recent announcement of the departure of their CEO. The article revolves around the question: 'Will the sudden departure of Wayne Inouye and a slumping stock price leave the computer maker open to a buyout or takeover?'"

152 comments

  1. I hope Dell buys them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then gives Gateway.com back to the guy they stole it from.

    1. Re:I hope Dell buys them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the Heechee left it to be found?

  2. Stupid Cow by garrett714 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Will the sudden departure of Wayne Inouye and a slumping stock price leave the computer maker open to a buyout or takeover?

    Probably not. Nobody really cares about Gateway anymore... They aren't doing anything innovative and the only thing they've ever had going for them was that stupid cow.

    1. Re:Stupid Cow by Saven+Marek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Probably not. Nobody really cares about Gateway anymore... They aren't doing
      > anything innovative and the only thing they've ever had going for them was that stupid cow.

      There isn't a computer maker in the top ten that is really doing anything innovative anyway it's all copying or refining what has gone on before them before and marketing it as something people will want. If they get that right things fall into place.

      Nobody knows gateway exists any more so their marketing is has been.

    2. Re:Stupid Cow by toddbu · · Score: 1
      Nobody really cares about Gateway anymore.

      And some of us still would never buy from them again. After having them mess up some memory and not step up to fix the problem, I wrote them off my vendor list. In this industry, there are always other players, so you have to keep your current customers happy or they'll go elsewhere for solutions.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:Stupid Cow by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Question: Does Apple do anything innovative? Does OS X count as "innovative"?

      Apple is top ten; it's actually sixth in U.S. marketshare, IIRC.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    4. Re:Stupid Cow by Saven+Marek · · Score: 0

      Not really, osx is just adding features always planned for vista from years back. ipod is just a music player like so many before it. imac is just like sony vaios that looked similar in 2001. mac mini is just a well marketed nano-itx computer. they are all things that are marketed well but were invented by other companies who were truly innovative.

    5. Re:Stupid Cow by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple doesn't innovate, but they bring innovations to consumers in a form they can actually use.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    6. Re:Stupid Cow by hattig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple gets a reasonable amount of patents, so I suppose they are innovative, but it is hard to tell in a world of obvious patents.

      How many patents do Dell, HP, Gateway, etc, get?

      Apple tend to innovate more at the package level than the component level. They might make products that other people have done before, but they make the whole package palatable to the purchaser, and thus desirable. They make it look good, work simply and easily, and these are things that PC makers are going to have trouble with as they don't have their own software stack incorporating an OS up through high end applications.

      And they do these things with rapid speed. Another respondent says it is just a nicely packaged nano-ITX system. Problem is, nano-ITX is barely available a year after the Mini was released. I think he meant mini-ITX, although the mini's motherboard is smaller than that. Again, the mini is more integrated and more powerful (I guess a 1.5GHz G4 is twice as powerful as a 1.2GHz C3, and that's before SIMD).

    7. Re:Stupid Cow by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was always disappointed that the Cow boxes didn't have Cow-print computers inside as well. The trouble is going far enough that you've crossed the line from "tacky" to "camp". People would be trolling EBay for a genuine, 1996 P90 "Gurnsey" or "Hereford", instead of Mac Cubes.

      Obligatory Gateway Bashing Story: Back around 1993ish, my boss bought a Gateway 486 laptop. He added a PCMCIA modem which never worked right. After some back and forth with heavily accented (Dakotan) tech-support, he finally got them to admit that they hadn't quite implemented the entire PCMCIA spec that was current at the time, meaning that it worked with many, but not all, adapters. That was our last Gateway.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    8. Re:Stupid Cow by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I bought my first laptop from Gateway, but after awhile of dealing with Support and such, I have written them off as well. Unfortunately, my wife loves them. At the moment, my wife loves her Gateway laptop and her old Gateway desktop - never had a problem with them and will probably get another one from them.

    9. Re:Stupid Cow by solios · · Score: 1

      Parent said There isn't a computer maker in the top ten that is really doing anything innovative anyway it's all copying or refining what has gone on before them before and marketing it as something people will want. If they get that right things fall into place.

      Everything Apple is doing now has been done by somebody else years ago. Usually that somebody else was Apple, but the time or the technology wasn't right. Now the hardware's caught up - they finally have their video store to go with the VOD prototypes from ten years ago. :P

    10. Re:Stupid Cow by Bin_jammin · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's hardly true. Gateway's got the most innovative website I've ever seen. Rarely does navigating a site equate to taking a Mensa IQ test. Every other OEM has relatively easy support pages, but Gateway takes the high road, demanding that you improve yourself in order solve whatever problem you may have. Dell, Apple, etc... all represent a "dumbing down" user experience, while Gateway is helping us help ourselves. After all, the smarter we become using their site, the less we will have to use their site at all. This must be working, because after using the site to find drivers, I've given up and vow never to return.

    11. Re:Stupid Cow by rhizome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they bring innovations to consumers in a form they can actually use.

      Which is a form of innovation in itself.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    12. Re:Stupid Cow by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      And they do these things with rapid speed. Another respondent says it is just a nicely packaged nano-ITX system. Problem is, nano-ITX is barely available a year after the Mini was released. I think he meant mini-ITX, although the mini's motherboard is smaller than that.

      The mini-itx has been around for several years. I picked up a fan less one in 2002 for a MP3 player in my car. If you wanted a nano, you had to poke around a bit harder. They tend to sell to folks building 'larger' x86 based embedded devices. Think cable boxes. Easy enough to buy if you know how to shop. You won't find them at compusa, however.

      As for size, ever wonder why the mini-itx form factor has an extra cm on the motherboard vs the mini mac? The mini-itx board is as small as it can be and still screw into a bog standard ATX chassis. I know I was surprised to find the screws matched up when I moved it out of the car to a firewall inside my office. If you wanted non-standard mount points, the board could have been smaller (like the nano-itx).

    13. Re:Stupid Cow by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple aren't a computer company, they're a marketing company. About the only innovation you see from Apple is stealing products from other companies and repackaging them...

      Hmm. That reminds me of somebody else, their name starting with an M or something. Can't think of it right off of the top of my head...

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    14. Re:Stupid Cow by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      M is the second letter in AMD, not the first.

    15. Re:Stupid Cow by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't see them steal the design for the P4

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    16. Re:Stupid Cow by NoData · · Score: 1

      the only thing they've ever had going for them was that stupid cow.

      Yeah but you know what they say...Moo' money, moo' problems.

      I'll get my coat.

    17. Re:Stupid Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mini-itx has been around for several years. I picked up a fan less one in 2002 for a MP3 player in my car.

      The Power mac G4 Cube preceded it, in 2000.

    18. Re:Stupid Cow by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      Not really, osx is just adding features always planned for vista from years back.

      Yeah, and all of those promised vista features are useable right now (and for the past several years that osx has been implementing them. Moron.

    19. Re:Stupid Cow by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      No, just everything x86 they produced up until the K5.

    20. Re:Stupid Cow by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Obviously you haven't visited Borland's site in the last decade. The worst navigation setup I've ever seen. Tiny tiny print. Inscrutable menus. Links that haven't gone where the claim, for the last 8 years or so. Patches in some bizarre format that requires some no-name unpacker. Patches arranged in no particular order, with no info about which patches are prerequistes for which others, or fix what. I finally gave up trying to patch their products.

      OMG! I just went there to refresh my memory and THEY CHANGED THE FRONT PAGE for the first time in this century. Now a lot more marketing-speak up front. The same bad old menus deeper down. Sigh. They used to be such a *good* company.

    21. Re:Stupid Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True to some extent. IT companies like to abuse the word 'innovate.' Companies today are merely standing on the shoulders of giants. Bonjour is just zeroconf repackaged, and UNIX is old. But I think there are some innovations, such as the clickwheel, and animations like Expose'. Spotlight came out before Google Desktop. A lot of innovation came from NextStep as well, which is related to Apple. In comparison to Gateway, I think Apple innovates a lot more.

    22. Re:Stupid Cow by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      If you changed the word "innovations" to "inventions" in the above comment, you'd be defining the word "innovate". You can't bring innovations to market in a form that customers can use, because if that were the case, they wouldn't already be innovations.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    23. Re:Stupid Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please stop trying to remove words from the English language. Don't redefine "innovate" as "invent" and then criticise people for using the original definition.

      You example of bonjour/zeroconf is classic innovation. Bonjour was an introduction of the technology to the mass market - before then, it was barely heard of.

    24. Re:Stupid Cow by hattig · · Score: 1

      I too got a mini-itx motherboard and case in 2002.

      My only computer system that at retail hasn't lost any value, and it is over 3 years old!

      Shame the performance sucks. I may turn it into a car pc or similar one day though, or a shed-pc :p

    25. Re:Stupid Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all comes down to money. Are they manking money? No? Then they aren't going to survive. Innovations or otherwise. Companies innovate to make money not just for the sake of innovation.

  3. Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Interesting


    We just bought a backup system from them. 2x 2U servers with 12x500GB drives each, plus an autoloader tape system with 75 LTO 800GB tapes. We got the extra warranty et. al. because we're expecting to put the hard drives through their paces... I hope we still get warranty service in 3 years...

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I hope we still get warranty service
      what, did you think you'd get it from Wayne Inouye personally?

    2. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by lheal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Over the past 15-20 years I've known many Gateway customers. Tech-savvy users, grandmas, University departments, small businesses, all have one thing in common: every single person or group I've ever known to have bought a Gateway PC has had to call their tech support line about something.

      How do I know this? After the first two or three, I started to ask: "How was their tech support?" They'd usually answer matter-of-factly, "Oh, they were great. There was this little problem, but they helped me fix it right away."

      Sometimes they'd say no, and I'd ask, "Really? You're the first." Then they'd respond with "Oh, well, now that you mention it, there was this problem with the [memory, hard disk, keyboard, missing item, whatever], but they helped me fix it right away."

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    3. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      It's true, they do tend to have problems, but their tech support is one of the best tech supports I've ever called anyway.

      --
      Why not fork?
    4. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by Physician · · Score: 0

      I got my first computer, which was a Gateway, back in 96. Because of my own foolishness I was forced to call their tech support a number of times. However, they were always able to figure out the problem and get it fixed right away. That's why my second computer from 2002 is also a Gateway and my third one which I should get within the next year will yet again be a Gateway assuming they're still in business.

      --
      Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
    5. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by anOminousCow · · Score: 1
      Customer expectations concerning the quality of computers has risen over the years. What customers considered good quality 15 years ago, is not acceptable in today's market. Apparantly Gateway's quality didn't rise as much as its customer's expectations. Today when one purchases a computer, It's quite reasonable to expect it to work correctly right out of the box. There's been ample time to engineer the problem areas out of the box.

      This is a lot like what happened in the automotive industry back in the 1970's. American producers were content with producing cars with 1950's quality levels. Along came the Japonese and the quality of their cars improved so fast as to blow the american models out of the water. After a some tough years american manufacturers began to wise up and started paying attention to the numerous (mostly small) defects that plagued their cars.

      --
      Spokesbossy for ominous cow herds everywhere.
    6. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Interesting perspective. I just had a conversation about how computers made 10 years ago held up better than modern ones. I have a sun workstation from 1992 sitting on my desk. It still works great. Only thing thats been replaced that I'm aware of was the hard drive. Conversely, my wife's powermac had the logic board fail after 3 years of constant use. Its the only part that failed in her system though. However, during the last 3 years i've owned 6 cd burners. I burn about 100 disks a year. I have a friend with a 2x burner that still works. I'd say quality is much worse than it was overall. Anyone remember when floppy disk drives outlasted the computers they were in? The only thing i think has gotten better is hard drives. I'm sure the increased failure rates of computers are in part the heat and power requirements of the newer systems. At work, i've seen dell machines fail within 3 days of placement. Why? They were engineered poorly and did not provide adequate ventilation. One of the fans didn't work at full power and one burned up all components. Dell only kept the case. Granted it was one of the mini form factor gx280s, but it had pleanty of room around it. I think people need to realize that all pc vendors do something wrong to save money. HP puts in power supplies that are too small, Dell machines usually don't get enough ventilation (although newer machines are a bit better), most gateway machines i've seen have their hard drives or motherboards go out, IBM thinkpads often lose their hard drives since heat from the processor is aimed at the drives, etc. Its not limited to pc vendors, asus has bios problems with their boards and i've seen several fall apart after a years usage.

      As for cars, I think there is a reason Toyota is number one. I don't personally like toyota but after buying a 2005 saturn ion for my wife I understand that the 70s are back for GM.

      Expectations are high because people make less money now than they did 5 years ago. Things need to last now. I'm actually getting the powermac repaired because i can't afford 2000 for a new g5. Heaven forbid i take away my wife's WoW computer.

    7. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      I just goes to show people can have vastly different experiences with the same company. I left Gateway for Dell ~8 years ago. The tech support from Gatway had gotten worse and worse for me over a number of years. The same for everyone else I knew. Everyone I know has switched to Dell/HP/Sony/Apple, and away from Gateway. Bad service has been one of the primary reasons.

    8. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kyde says your backup system fucks Will Dunn...........GOATS!!!!

    9. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by WreckingCru · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. I write this on my first laptop - a Gateway M210. I've had some minor issues with it - and Gateway has been amazingly helpful. They even have this "online chat" feature - so you don't have stick to the phone - and turnaround time is usually a minute or two. They are very nice, fairly intelligible and fix things pretty quickly. One time I had send my laptop for a charging port issue - I got it back within 2 days all fixed up. This compared to my last computer - Dell....my 5 O'Clock shadow came back by the time I even got a courtesy 'hello' on their call. I really hope Gateway survives...their products are VERY competitive with great specs at near-jaw-dropping low prices. I picked up a Centrino 1.6, 14.1" widescreen, 60GB and DVD+/-RW for under $1200. It even has this screen technology (whose name I forget) that makes images look very TV-esqe; countless people who walk by my laptop stop and ask me where I got it from because they love the screen. I even convinced a couple of other friends to buy a Gateway as well.

      --
      If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants.
    10. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Odd... I worked at Gateway (or rather, the company they outsource their phone support to, something we were instructed to lie directly to customers about) and the support was terrible. Admittedly I was in customer service, but about 50% of the problems were caused by someone within the company screwing something up due to incompetence or disinterest. The tech support people were particularly poor with perhaps 10% of them being capable of doing their jobs.

      When the employees weren't themselves to blame the company's policies tried as hard as possible to prevent you from doing anything helpful for the customers. At least once a day a customer would call in to find out that the computer they sent in to be serviced (by the outsourced service centers) had been lost by the service center. Packages coming from Gateway were frequently mis-addressed and many times I had customers calling in two or three times before thier information was updated in our databases (of which there were about 3 with a procedural nightmare of which departments had access to which).

      I felt that Gateway support was terrible before working there and that they made a sub-standard product that I wouldn't reccomend to anyone. When I left this opinion was a few orders of magnitude higher. The only way they've stayed in business this long is because the vast majority of customers (based on those who called at least) are complete and utter idiots who just don't know any better.

    11. Re:Oh Boy, Oh Boy! by lheal · · Score: 1

      The point is that everyone has to call. That means the product is crap.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  4. BTX? by garrett714 · · Score: 0

    Balanced Technology Extended (BTX) is a more efficient desktop system design that was developed as a follow-up to the ATX form factor specification. Since its introduction in 1995, ATX has been the industry standard in chassis design.

    It's also proprietary stuff like this that is keeping Gateway down with the other bottom feeders.

    1. Re:BTX? by anOminousCow · · Score: 1

      Ah! One poster complains about Gateway not doing anything innovative, the next complains about them being innovative. Something's not right here.

      --
      Spokesbossy for ominous cow herds everywhere.
    2. Re:BTX? by pla · · Score: 1

      Ah! One poster complains about Gateway not doing anything innovative, the next complains about them being innovative. Something's not right here.

      Well, back in the ooooooold days, they had a truly wonderful product - No, not their PCs... their keyboards that natively supported keyboard macros.

      AFAIK, you simply can't get a product like that anymore. Sure, you have a million and one models that support "internet/multimedia hotkeys" (whicht, in my experience, never seem to work quite right unless you use MSIE, Outlook Express (not even real Outlook), and WMP), and some that claim to support macros (with "Free Windows-only software included!"), but none that truly let you map any chord to any combination of keystrokes, interpreted natively by the keyboard before the PC ever sees it.


      But aside from that - Just another PC manufacturer. And they don't even offer that keyboard anymore (which commands a hell of a premium on EBay, incidentally).

    3. Re:BTX? by windowpain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, brilliant idea, those keyboards. N00bs were constantly reprogramming them by accidentally hitting the key combo that turned on macro recording mode. Sort of like giving people a massage table that doubled as a band saw when you shift your weight just right.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    4. Re:BTX? by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      BTX was conceived by Intel. Gateway was just a promoter.

    5. Re:BTX? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I used to have an Apricot PC which had a keyboard that had a small LCD display built in, along with a calculator app. The results from the calculator could be sent to the main machine, which was a lot nicer than firing up a calculator app on the PC. There were also a small number of programmable buttons below the LCD. It was also the only machine I've seen with an 80186 CPU, and the only machine to run Windows 1. I didn't get to play with it much, however, since it died shortly after entering my possession (it was quite old by then, and had not been well treated).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:BTX? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      If you want a keyboard with macros, you can always get the Logitech G15 gaming keyboard. 18 "G-keys" which are macro keys, and three mode switchers.

    7. Re:BTX? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      God, those keyboards sucked. Sometimes, they'd get a macro "stuck" so that nothing would seem to get rid of it. It was easier to throw the damned keyboards away than figure out why you couldn't deprogram them.

    8. Re:BTX? by deacon · · Score: 1
      Actually those keyboards were perfect, for the right person.

      I programmed my Autocad commands into the keyboard so I could issue draw commands strictly from the keyboard, since moving your mouse out of the drawing area into the command area wastes more than 50% of your time. Taking your left hand off of the mouse to type commands 2 handed is even more absurd. The modifier keys ( I think it was alt, shift and cntrl) let me make enough chorded combinations to make it all work out.

      My first drafting system was Unigraphics II, so I with Autocad I was trying to make a replacement for the button-box/numerical keypad type of control, which was a hard-to-learn but lightning-fast to use interface. You did need to learn to mouse left-handed, so your right hand could run the keypad, but that only takes 2 weeks, and after that you can draw as fast as the system will respond to input. After I got an Alpha workstation, the system was finally faster than I was, as long as nothing else was using the CPU. The GUI interfaces for commands now really suck, because you have to move your mouse out of the drawing area. After 4 weeks, you are as fast as you are ever going to get, which is to say, Slooow. ZZZzzzZZZ.

      It's as stupid as trying to type with a chop-stick instead of ten fingers.

      :(

  5. I hate to be negative... by Spiffness · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But uh. Gateways have always sucked. So uh... suprise? Gateway has failed to do anything special for years, so simply being around in the 'make a crappy PC, set a low price, sell by the millions' game isnt enough. Remember Packard Bell?

    1. Re:I hate to be negative... by NorbrookC · · Score: 1

      But just think of the impact on the many computer techs whose livelihood depends on having a steady stream of Gateway computers entering their shops for repair! When Packard-Bell went under, Gateway was there to pick up the slack. Now, they'll just have to rely on HP Pavilions.

    2. Re:I hate to be negative... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But uh. Gateways have always sucked.

      That's because you don't remember Gateway before they went mega-commerical. Many of us remember Gateway as being the mail-order company that always built PCs to the highest specifications of technology and quality. When everyone else was shipping 2x CDRom drives, Gateway was shipping 4x. When everyone was shipping 4 megs of RAM, Gateway was shipping 16. When everyone else had non-existant technical support, Gateway had excellent service that got your problem taken care of right away.

      THAT is the Gateway I remember. The Gateway of today is nothing more than some other megacorp abusing the namesake of a company who knew how to build computers.

    3. Re:I hate to be negative... by n0spamus · · Score: 1

      The Gateway I remember in 1991: PCs with very crappy keyboards
      The Gateway I remember in 1999: PCs with very noisy fans

      My overall impression: shaving off every last penny for the bottom line by using the cheapest parts

      The Dell I remember in 1991: excellent keyboards
      The Dell I remember in 1999: quiet PCs, long before they became popularized
      (I might add, they remain quiet after years of use)

      My overall impression: cutting costs in mass production / efficient designs, use good quality for the parts that matter

      Hence, Gateway:Chevy Dell:Toyota

    4. Re:I hate to be negative... by benzapp · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bullshit.

      I worked as a tech at CompUSA in high school, and we charged double the price per hour to fix Gateways because they were such pieces of shit. This was in the 486 days, right about the time you are talking about.

      And the 16 megs of ram bit is total BS too. Gateway, like everybody else, didn't ship machines with 16 megs of ram until Windows 95 came out.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    5. Re:I hate to be negative... by Literaphile · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's true -- I'm typing this message on a circa 2003 Gateway laptop, and people who hear the fan mistake it for an airplane taking off. Incredibly loud!

    6. Re:I hate to be negative... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What model of Gateway do you have? I have a late-2002 vintage 600XL and I get the same "Is that a hair dryer?" response when the fan kicks on to cool off the 2.2GHz P4-M chip. My girlfriend has a mid-'03 400VTX with a 2.0 P4-M and it has the same fan noise. However, my brother's VAIO V505 had a 2.0 P4-M but made about no noise. I wonder if Gateway just got a lot of noisy (but relatively effective- my 600 runs at 60C and his Sony ran at 70C) fans?

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    7. Re:I hate to be negative... by publius1234 · · Score: 1

      And the 16 megs of ram bit is total BS too. Gateway, like everybody else, didn't ship machines with 16 megs of ram until Windows 95 came out.

      Not true - I had a 486 with 16 megs of RAM that shipped with DOS 6.2 and Windows 3.1. This was a full 2 years before Winows 95.

    8. Re:I hate to be negative... by Literaphile · · Score: 1

      I've got a M675 laptop with a 3.2 Pentium 4. Loud, very loud.

    9. Re:I hate to be negative... by DjLizard · · Score: 1

      I fix 10x more HP Pavilions and Dells than I do anything else, and it's not because they suck... it's because nobody buys anything else around here.

    10. Re:I hate to be negative... by cloudturtle · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you have to go way, way, way back for that version of gateway and then they were only #3 at best. See back in the day, way before Alienware produced fat ass rigs, Micron consistently produced the best boxen money could buy (talking PCs here, not Apple, SGI, Sun, or Alpha boxes). Then again, the second best scores -- and contending for the best -- were posted by none other than Dell. Yes, there was a time way back in 95-96 that Dell produced high quality, fast, top of the line boxes.

    11. Re:I hate to be negative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny you should say that, as my reality differs from yours. My coworkers and I had several (Dell) Precision 220 workstation, from around '99 I guess. P3 933 Mhz systems. These things were all horrendously loud, the fans and the drives (scsi 160). They had many failures just outside the warranty period, from motherboards to disk drives, to video cards, to fans wearing out. This is out of a pool of only 12 or so machines. I generally like Dell, and since we use them exclusively for our desktop systems, we get very good support typically. The bad part was, most of the failures took place shortly after the warranty periods, so we were kind of screwed in most cases.

    12. Re:I hate to be negative... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Remember Packard Bell? You sir have ruined my evening. Packard Bell was the bastard child of the computer industry.

    13. Re:I hate to be negative... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Quite. I remember Gateway offering late 486s and early Pentiums with 16MB of RAM around 1994.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    14. Re:I hate to be negative... by BlabberMouth · · Score: 1

      I'd guess he has something in the range of a 1995-1998 model. Gateway still sold some quality machines during that time.

    15. Re:I hate to be negative... by will_die · · Score: 1

      Back before the gateway store and when they were Gateway 2000 they were a great company.
      Purchased a few hundred computers from them for work and 4 for personnal and family use, and they were great.
      They use to have far better tech support, better prices and better technology used. Then they decided to grow huge in the consumer market and that did them in.
      The other thing they were really good for was when you were purchasing newer technology systems, all other places would place a premium price on them, Gateway charge a fixed overhead and profit.

  6. At a recent CEO roundtable... by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Michael Dell was asked what he would do if he were the CEO of Gateway:

    "I'd butcher the cow and have a barbecque for the shareholders."

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:At a recent CEO roundtable... by PerfectMark · · Score: 0

      But he also said something similar about Apple.

    2. Re:At a recent CEO roundtable... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      But the prion for Mad Cow disease isn't destroyed by cooking.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. Buyout? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They have to be worth something first.. I doubt they are worth the $ for somone to buy them at this point.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Buyout? by toddbu · · Score: 1
      They have to be worth something first.

      Their customer list is worth something, as are their call center and distribution systems. The interesting thing about a customer list is how to value it. If it's a million happy customers then it's worth a lot. If it's a million unhappy customers then it ain't worth squat.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:Buyout? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of value in a name. Gateway used to be a household name. If someone were to resurrect the company with fresh ideas the name alone could help carry it far. In corporate America a brand name is worth a lot of $.

  8. Only 1 Choice: Liquidation by reporter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As the slowing sales of Dell computers indicate, the personal-computer market in the developed world (e.g. USA, Japan, and Europe) has reached saturation. Gateway represents surplus capacity. It always leads to only 1 conclusion: liquidation.

    One unrealistic possibility for Gateway is to focus on the developing countries like China, but companies like Lenovo have the home-court advantage. Lenovo has close relationships with Taiwanese computer-chip manufacturers (who also sell their wares to the Chinese military in Beijing). Lenovo can also exploit ultra-low-cost labor in China.

    How can Gateway compete against Lenovo? Gateway cannot. IBM could not and sold its PC division to Lenovo.

  9. NX860XL by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    Hmm... And I was just thinking their new Core Duo laptop looked like the perfect mobile linux solution.

    I wonder if this will make them cheaper or more expensive in the near future....

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:NX860XL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this will make them cheaper or more expensive in the near future....

      I think the technical term is "less existent".

  10. Dude... by TriZz · · Score: 0

    Dude, you're getting bought out by Dell.

    --
    No matter how hot a girl is - some guy somewhere is sick of her shit.
  11. Fast Food by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Exactly how sudden was Wayne Inouye's departure? That is, did he have shares still to vest, and did he walk away from holy fsck amount of money .. assuming that the company was worth anything by the time they vested?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Fast Food by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That's the sad thing, executives don't seem to be held accountable for the performance of the company, it is as if you have to guarantee them a certain amount of money, succeed or fail, before they will head up your company. I think shareholders are just being duped when the company offers their huge, practically guaranteed payouts, even if the individual does poorly.

      Carly Fiorina left HP a very hurting company and yet she walked out with a golden parachute when everyone else just had paper ones. It is somewhat understandable if the market is hurting, but when there are indications of chaos within the company, the blame often deserves to go to the top.

    2. Re:Fast Food by toddbu · · Score: 1
      Carly Fiorina left HP a very hurting company and yet she walked out...

      HP was in trouble when she came on board, and was in even more trouble when she left. They seem to be turning it around now that she's out of the way. It's really sad that CEOs can do nothing and get paid for it, but it's even worse when they can do real damage and still get a hefty paycheck.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:Fast Food by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've often wondered why CEOs aren't paid a modest salary and a heap of shares that they are not allowed to sell for 5-10 years. This would encourage them to ensure that the company is in a good shape until about 5-10 years after they leave (at which time their successor would be trying to make sure the share price was still high after he retired).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Fast Food by anOminousCow · · Score: 1
      I think that something like that would be a good way to compensate CEOs. They get a modest salary, say $50K, and the rest of their compensation is in the form of stocks. X shares per year served. But but they would get only 1/3 of those shares each year for the following three years. If they leave the company in bad or deteriorating shape, the shares are going to be worth squat. Big rewards for doing a good job. Peanuts if they do a lousy job.

      --
      Spokesbossy for ominous cow herds everywhere.
  12. Can Wayne Inouye Save Gateway? by neonprimetime · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can Wayne Inouye Save Gateway? ... Apparently not.

  13. Gateway's decline by anOminousCow · · Score: 1

    Gateway's sales have been declining for a number of years now. Actually, before HP bought Compaq, I thought that Gateway would have been a good acquisition for HP. If I'd been on Gateway's board then, I sure would have looked into the possibility.

    --
    Spokesbossy for ominous cow herds everywhere.
    1. Re:Gateway's decline by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Maybe HP still should. I'm sure another 2% (or whatever Gateway has) of market share could not hurt HP at this point.

  14. $9M sales, $19M payoff? by Jerry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gateway's profit after deducting Microsoft's payoff was only $9M.

    They paid the CEO $19 and bonuses for one year's work before he bails.

    But, probably the real reason why he couldn't make a go of it at Gateway was inteference from Snyder and the rest of the board.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  15. Happy gateway customers by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Can you think of even one at this point?

    Their 'service' is pretty dismal. I cant comment on distribution as we no longer include them in our approved vendor list.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  16. About time! by Channard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe now no more cows will have to die to provide the material for their PC boxes. Vegetable rights and peace!

  17. Maybe they can borrow Apple's word by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    If they convince the media to call them the "beleagured Gateway Corp." perhaps, just perhaps they can turn it around.

    --
    Why not fork?
  18. Stick a fork into Gateway by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    They're done.....

    1. Re:Stick a fork into Gateway by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoa! Better check for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy first!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  19. Second time buyers didn't return to Gateway by Proudrooster · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gateway has been dead for awhile now as evidenced by the $2/share stock price. Remember the local Gateway store where you could go to the factory showroom and order a custom computer? The main problem that Gateway had was inferior parts and poor after-the-sale customer service, which resulted in customers not returning again and again for upgrades and second time PC purchases.

    An ancedotal story. My mother-in-law wanted a new computer and I offered to build her one. She insisted that she wanted a large company like Gateway standing behind her in case of a problem. I groaned and let her buy from Gateway. The PC had problems out of the box, most noticably skipping when playing audio CD's. Grinning, I told my mother-in-law just to call gateway and they would take care of it. She called and they ran her through the reboot your computer, click this irrelevant non-related thing, then that irrelevant thing. To make a long story short, the CD-ROM drive was defective and Gateway refused to replace it, but gave her a code and 1-800 number to call periodically for more information regarding a fix.

    I just laughed, and laughed and laughed. Yep, the big company was standing behind (sic) it's brand new defective product. Soon after than the video card died, but Gateway did replace that after 2 agonizing calls, and then close to the end of the warranty period the monitor died, which was also replaced.

    So when it came time to upgrade to a better PC? Did my mother-in-law go back to Gateway? Nope, she called me to come and take care of it.

    Gateway had a strong lead and should have spun itself off into a world-class service and support organization. They could have been the first "Geek Squad", but they chose substandard customer service coupled with the cheapest parts available to make margins. Shipping defective monitors around has got to cut into profit margins.

    Because of this, everyone has already bought a Gateway and isn't going back for another. I wonder if I could sell a T-Shirt, which read: "Been there, bought that, Got the Cow-Box." :)

    1. Re:Second time buyers didn't return to Gateway by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep! I'll throw in my own anecdote.

      I was working in I.T. for a mid-sized company that was using exclusively Dell, but got irritated at the long hold times just to get parts replaced under warranty, and some billing mistakes they made. So they asked me to consider alternatives. We opted for Toshiba for some of our laptop purchases, and as an experiment, tried Gateway. They had a number of new slim-line desktop PCs out that they were selling through their "business division", pre-loaded with Windows NT 4.0 (which was what we ran at the time).

      The first shipment arrived, and out of the box, they were having issues. When we installed certain software packages on them, they repeatedly crashed with the blue screen of death, and wouldn't reboot properly if you applied one of the NT service packs on them. Calls to Gateway technical support did no good, and I was referred to my local Gateway Country store. So there I was, a corporate customer, expected to hand-deliver these PCs to a consumer-oriented retail store and leave them there for "warranty service". I ended up bringing them just one of them to troubleshoot for us. First, they told me the hard drive was bad and replaced it. (Obviously, that didn't fix anything.) Then they swapped out the motherboard and blamed bad RAM as the problem. Nope! Finally, someone realized Gateway had just released a new BIOS for them that fixed the issue - but the new BIOS version wasn't posted to their web site yet for some reason, so I was told I've have to bring all of the boxes in to the store to let them flash upgrade them. (Umm, no. Not an acceptable answer!) So I just kept combing the web site until the upgrade was finally made publically available and got the systems updated myself.

      After that fiasco, we never used Gateway again. Heck, even their web site was difficult to navigate to get drivers and BIOS updates compared to Dell.

    2. Re:Second time buyers didn't return to Gateway by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      And wait til grandma's machine breaks....you'll be singing a different tune then. Who's going o take back your video card? Sometimes I have had difficulty calling the manufacturer to get components fixed. Gateway was excellent when we bought our current workhorse desktop my wife currently uses. One reason I bought it off of them at the time was that they had a store I could take it back to if it broke. Well we had a power suply go out in it and I took it in it took 4 days to get the damn Power Supply fixed because they stock ZERO parts. DUMB. Gateway had a good deal with the stores and it would have bene even better if they had parts and staff that could fix it. I am a geek just like the next slashdotter, but I have to do work on my PC and not work to get it fixed.

      --

      Gorkman

  20. They should buy SGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And create Silicon Gateway Inc. The executive teams are perfect for one another.

    It would be totally craptacular.

    1. Re:They should buy SGI by anOminousCow · · Score: 1

      They could rename it 'Silly, Corny Graphics'.

      --
      Spokesbossy for ominous cow herds everywhere.
  21. Retail sales: great! Direct sales: Crap! by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

    Gateway reported that their retail sales (though Best Buy, etc) rocketed and their direct sales (via gateway.com) plummeted last quarter.

    Retail sales are mostly AMD-based. They have some very neat looking Athlon 64 X2 desktops these days. (For people who don't custom-build their desktop PCs. Not that there's anything wrong with that...)

    Direct sales are 100% Intel. Let's face it, Dell pretty much owns that market.

    I had hoped that their CEO could straighten out Gateway like he did eMachines, but now... ugh. I fear that the old management is going to screw up the progress that was made in the retail channel. Hopefully I'm just being overly cynical. HP needs the competition.

  22. Gateway has problems by cejones · · Score: 1

    Of my friends who did not first consult me and bought a computer from Gateway, they all had problems with the machine once it arrived... Motherboard smoked during the first bootup, one had a defective CD drive, etc. Friends don't let friends purchase Gateway computers. I'd be interested in seeing a pro list for reasons to purchase Gateway. I am imagining it is quite short.

    1. Re:Gateway has problems by damneinstien · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, seriously, I have **never** had problems with Gateway for computers. I bought my first computer from them back when I was 12. As a child with non-technical parents, any "problem" we had was software-related (read Windows) and they were more than helpful in fixing that too. Recently, my hard-drive from a 4-year old computer died and they sent a new one after one call.

      Last year, I bought a laptop from them. ALL their hardware is 100% non-proprietary (i.e. not their own; Pentium M, IPW2200 Wireless, etc). That means I can run Ubuntu Linux on it pretty much out of the box (had to configure volume keys etc.) That for me was a great plus.

      I suppose this isn't really a "pro list" but is just my positive experience.

  23. Re:Only 1 Choice: Liquidation by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

    How can Gateway compete against Lenovo? Gateway cannot. IBM could not and sold its PC division to Lenovo.

    They're a gonner ... though it would be interesting to see one of these failing legacy manufacturers attempt a line of high quality workstation & notebooks. Something along the lines of American Megatrends, which still survives due to the niche' high reliability market needed for things like motherboards for industrial equipment. Currently, I can't find any manufacturer to match the quality of my old IBM 600E Thinkpad and I'd gladly pay for the quality if offered.

  24. Is it time for acquiring Gateway ? by bacchu_anjan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sun should acquire Gateway and get into the PC market. This would let Sun increase its enterprise reach -- not sure that Sun wants to get in touch with Consumers, though.

    BR,
    ~A

    1. Re:Is it time for acquiring Gateway ? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Sun has no interest in the common PC market. They're much more interested in specialized home computers like thin clients. Also, if they did want to sell a PC they easily have the capacity to build it themselves. They hardly need Gateway for that.

  25. What A Great Time To Become An x86 OEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to go Apple! What a great time to let your company be forced into the 'lucrative' x86 OEM market.

  26. It's up to Google... by dbucowboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google should buy Gateway... it'd be a good move for them... :)

    --
    This just in! 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.
  27. Just the beginning by argoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone else noticed how all these companies are starting to have troubble. Gateway, SGI, even GM and Ford.

    IMHO, the problem is that the US economy has more debt than it can pay off at face value so this is just the beginning. What will most likely happen is that the fed will monitize some debts in order to prevent massive bankruptcies. But it will make the problem worse, because watering down the value of the money will drive up commodity prices like gas and food, but it likely won't drive up pay. So people will have the same debts, but costs that are several times higher. This will cause more bankruptcies, which will lead to more monitization, which will lead to more bankruptcies and so on in a vicious cycle.

    It seems to me that these next few years will be hell. Also, I think the dollar is doomed as a global reserve currency, and I wouldn't be suprised if the dollar ceased to be a currency at all. Put extra money into precious metals.

    1. Re:Just the beginning by MKalus · · Score: 1
      IMHO, the problem is that the US economy has more debt than it can pay off at face value so this is just the beginning.


      That is clearly part of the problem, but the way bigger problem is that the US mentality is based around "cheap". Meaning cheaper products at a faster and faster pace.

      Two things happen then:

      1. The Quality goes down the drain.
      2. Someone else will come along sooner or later and make it even cheaper (see China).

      What will most likely happen is that the fed will monitize some debts in order to prevent massive bankruptcies. But it will make the problem worse, because watering down the value of the money will drive up commodity prices like gas and food, but it likely won't drive up pay. So people will have the same debts, but costs that are several times higher. This will cause more bankruptcies, which will lead to more monitization, which will lead to more bankruptcies and so on in a vicious cycle.


      Possible, though that would probably a "best case scenario". It is not only companies who have debt but the US as well. China and Japan being the largest US debt holder in the world.

      How long do you think they are willing to give their good money for stuff they pretty much should just fire their stoves with?

      The US as a whole still seems to operate like it is 1985 and the only valid currency in "open trade" is the USD. With the Emergence of the Euro (and the Euro Zone) this is no longer valid and there are already some countries who are getting slowly out of the USD and into the Euro.

      All it needs to have the US (and world economies to some degree) crash and burn is someone panicing somewhere and throwing large amounts of USD and Bonds on the open market. If one or two follow after that you may see a massive payoff and I doubt very much that either Japan or China alone in this scenario would be willing to throw more money at it, and I doubt the US can do it because they probably don't have too many "hard currency" reserves themselves (obviously you cannot buy your own debt with the money you print).

      The Dollar is becoming softer, but that is not what is doing companies like Gateway et al. in right now, it is the first two points I wrote.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:Just the beginning by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Put extra money into precious metals.

      Its fairly obvious you dont read "fat freddies's cat and the furry freak brothers" comics

      Dope gets you through times of no money better than money gets you through times of no dope. All good hippies know what.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Just the beginning by argoff · · Score: 1

      (obviously you cannot buy your own debt with the money you print)

      Sure you can. After all, the bonds are promises to pay in dollars and not gold. Of course don't be suprised if it causes instant inflation and instant dollar dumping. In fact, some have argued that it is already happening. Just as China stopped buying more bonds at auction causing markets to get really nervous, some mysterious account in the Cyamans started buying billions and billions worth of US treasuries at auction.

    4. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't change with the times and look ahead so you can anticipate future changes to some degree, you'll be consigned to the dustbin of history.

      GM and Ford are the best examples of the four you named-- they have only their executives to blame for their troubles, because they were short-sighted, greedy assholes.

      When SUVs became popular they just kept cranking them out, bigger and bigger models, as if gas prices would never go up, with nary a thought to what the future might bring. They just wanted to milk the "stupid, ungainly vehicle" craze for all it was worth for short-term profits, and now that it's obvious gas prices will never again go below two bucks a gallon the chickens have come home to roost. People began flocking to more fuel-efficient vehicles made by foreign car companies. Ford and GM had to seriously chop prices and offer all sorts of deals to move their products.

      And then there's the little matter of quality-- the first car I ever bought was a brand-new Pontiac, in 1994. I had all sort of problems with it. There were quite a few recalls for serious things. I now own two Toyotas, and they have needed NOTHING except for routine maintenance. I did recently get a recall notice for one of them, and you know what it was for? Because the daytime running lights are too bright and it was found that that was preventing oncoming drivers from seeing turn signals clearly. Contrast that with a "minor" problem on my Pontiac, where the ABS system would occasionally get confused and COMPLETELY DISABLE MY BRAKES. That's right, I'd press the pedal and it would go right to the floor, without slowing the car at all.

    5. Re:Just the beginning by SillySnake · · Score: 1

      I had a long talk with a finance manager and long time employee of GM the other day..Basically he explained that while other companies have already made the move to build plants in China, Mexico, and other places where cars can be built cheaper GM is just now being forced to make that move. They waited as long as possible to do it, and maintained American jobs for several years longer than they had to. GM sold 9 million cars last year, of which, only 4 million were sold in the United States.. That means over half of the cars sold weren't sold to Americans.. It only makes sense to close down some plants here and open more in India/China where the market is growing, and if they get life behind there now, there won't be a GM in America or anywhere else.

    6. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US as a whole still seems to operate like it is 1985 and the only valid currency in "open trade" is the USD.

      I'm thinking 1984, not 1985, but that's an entirely different topic.

    7. Re:Just the beginning by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Sure you can. After all, the bonds are promises to pay in dollars and not gold. Of course don't be suprised if it causes instant inflation and instant dollar dumping. In fact, some have argued that it is already happening. Just as China stopped buying more bonds at auction causing markets to get really nervous, some mysterious account in the Cyamans started buying billions and billions worth of US treasuries at auction.


      Okay, good point, but who do you think is buying all the bonds? The US Government?
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  28. This can only be good news for Gateway by The-Bus · · Score: 1
    Culled from this NYT article:

    SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 15, 2006 - It may not be the last laugh, but on Friday afternoon, after the close of the stock market, Steven P. Jobs, the chief executive of Apple Computer, shared an e-mail chuckle with his employees. The message was prompted by the 12 percent surge in Apple's stock price last week, which pushed the company's market capitalization to $72.13 billion, passing Dell's value of $71.97 billion.

    In 1997, shortly after Mr. Jobs returned to Apple, Dell's founder and chairman, Michael S. Dell, was asked at a technology conference what might be done to fix Apple.

    "What would I do?" Mr. Dell said to an audience of several thousand information technology managers. "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders."

    On Friday, apparently savoring the moment, Mr. Jobs sent a brief e-mail message to Apple employees, which read: "Team, it turned out that Michael Dell wasn't perfect at predicting the future. Based on today's stock market close, Apple is worth more than Dell. Stocks go up and down, and things may be different tomorrow, but I thought it was worth a moment of reflection today. Steve."
    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:This can only be good news for Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume Jobs didn't send out any emails after the 30 percent plunge Apple's stock has gone through this past couple of weeks due to slowing iPod sales and the market picking up on the magnitude of the Apple being forced to turn to Intel fiasco.

      A moment of reflection is indeed called for at Apple...

    2. Re:This can only be good news for Gateway by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You'll probably note that the GP picked a 'date of triumph' in mid January, after all the Christmas iPod sales were registered, but before everybody was fully set up and not buying music from iTunes.

  29. AOL Silicon Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL Silicon Gateway, with George W. Bush as CEO and Cheney as VP. They would kill their customers, not Iraqis.

  30. A big but risky opportunity by zogger · · Score: 1

    One of the big box vendors will eventually do it, ship linux on the desktop as the default OS installation. It would give the industry a nice kick in the pants. A partnership with any of the major refined distros would do it, that and work with the peripheral vendors to offer devices that would work on plug-in without alot of hassle. It's been "there" potentially for a couple years now. There are many smaller vendors doing it, just none of the larger ones.

    1. Re:A big but risky opportunity by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      That was the first thought that leaped to my mind, but I didn't say anything thinking it'd be flamed before it hit the floor (weekend and all, y'know). But in fact, that seems to be the last resort of tech companies which find themselves floundering. Check out Solaris - without Belenix and Nexenta, stunted beginning efforts though they are, how many home PC users would have ever seen a Solaris system on their desktops? Gateway could ship with a solid Linux distro which would love their cheap hardware, cut their competitor's prices, and re-arrange the cow-spot pattern on the boxes into a penguin pattern (hey! They're both black-n-white!). Like many other big tech companies that have started boosting Linux, they are at the "What have we got to lose?" point - which is about the only damn way any innovation ever happens, unfortunately.

    2. Re:A big but risky opportunity by westlake · · Score: 1
      One of the big box vendors will eventually do it, ship linux on the desktop as the default OS installation.

      Linux at Walmart.com has slipped to four systems with specs so mediocre it scarcely seems worth the trouble to keep them in stock.

      The future mass-market PC at retail will be the media oriented Vista or the Mac.

  31. GW service sucks by Nimey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a university IT tech. Last month I had a fairly GW desktop PC's hard drive die. The drive was an IDE model. GW tech support not once but twice sent me a Serial ATA unit instead. That would be fine because the computer supports SATA as well, but they didn't send me a cable. After the first SATA drive was sent, I told the tech that I wanted either a cable or the correct drive. He refused me a cable.

    Complaining to customer support got me a cable. Turns out the techs ordered the correct drive both times, but the warehouse was out of IDE hard drives so it failed silently and sent a SATA drive instead.

    That said, the techs I chatted with (using their Java client) were professional (a bit too professional, if you know what I mean) and knew their jobs.

    I'm not recommending my clients order GW machines for the time being. Our other major vendor for desktop PCs is Dell, and while their techs make me jump through the same hoops to get replacement parts, at least I get the right gorram parts sent to me.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:GW service sucks by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      a bit too professional, if you know what I mean

      Fraknly, I don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

    2. Re:GW service sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      At least you got a hard drive at all shipped out.

      I work for a company performing Gateway on site service.

      At least 40% of the gateway service calls we get, Gateway totally fucks up on their end. I've seen everything from the right part, sent via UPS, to a FedEx drop point, THREE TIMES, each time when I called to have them reissue the part they confirmed it was going direct to the customer.

      They also send the wrong part regularly. I've also seen them send THREE MOTHERBOARDS AND FOUR CPUS for a single service call on a single uniprocessor system.

      Their laptops are horribly designed from a technicians standpoint. IF you run across a broken out of warranty gateway laptop, open it up for a good scare. Two laptops with a rougly equivalent featureset... the Gateway will typically take three times as long to perform equivalent service. On a few models specific repairs might be easier on the gateway, but thats hit or miss- there is no consistency at all to how Gateway puts together a laptop, which further hurts quick servicability. Dell is at least somewhat consistent within a given series. Consistent enough that you believe it was actually the same company putting it together.

      Their phone techs are competent, but they do need a better system to coordinate between field and phone techs- we have to call the general customer tech support line. Their field techs are competent.

      Their shipping department is absolutely fucking clueless. If it was a military operation, they'd all be executed for dereliction of duty. Thats how bad they are.

    3. Re:GW service sucks by Nimey · · Score: 1

      As in the second one was trying to "handle" me (I was irked about the drive) and stick to the script instead of just getting the problem fixed. Frankly, I don't think he believed me.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:GW service sucks by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      As in the second one was trying to "handle" me (I was irked about the drive) and stick to the script instead of just getting the problem fixed.

      Do you mean, "professional" and "handle" in the sexual prostitution sense? Because otherwise, I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.

    5. Re:GW service sucks by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Nice troll. Do you need the services of a taxidermist?

  32. Gateway Had it commin' by DeusOTdeuS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I worked for Gateway when they had all the retail stores. The only thing that helped us sell the pc's were the promise of US based tech support when the rest of the PC world sent it to India. That and the random Profile and Tablet computer sale helped. Honestly before they bought EMachines, Gateway was doing ok with the consumer electronics dept. as well. We sold TONS of their cheap plasmas before the rest of the market came down to their prices. Their number one source for cash flow was those stores. Not their most profitable source but the most sales. When they changed everything to go with retail outlets and the Emachines business model, everyone thought they went out of business. I didn't talk to a single person that knew that they still were selling computers. How can you recover from that? Their biggest asset was their customer base. Look at their stock come April 04'. That's when they closed their retail stores and it was all down hill from there. They did this to themselves, not the flopping PC industry.

  33. Selling military technology etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (who also sell their wares to the Chinese military in Beijing)

    Let's face it... the military industrial complexes around the world doesn't care much about ethics. The site you linked to is highly anti-Taiwan, but you could easily write a similar site about any country in the world. There are rotten people all over the world, and just because some egghead in Taiwan opens a restaurant with a nazi theme, doesn't mean that all Taiwanese people are nazis, okay? Just as little as all people in the U.S. aren't racist and bigots because of a few bigots in the south, or Sweden being a nazi country because 50 neo-nazis gets permission to march down a street to show their stupidity.

  34. Capacitor Curse by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    I don't know when the Tech Support went to hell but the machines quality dropped off right around the time the Pentium 3 was launched. Gateway was effected by the Capacitor Curse and knew it (thanks Siebel!) but wouldn't do anything about it. If you had a FlexCase system with an MSI board you were screwed, they didn't even have enough for warranty service so they gave huge discounts to those customers.

    1. Re:Capacitor Curse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used to have 24 hour phone support around the time of the 486DX.

      They also gave you a printed manual for all of your hardware components. They all were 3 hole punched and were in a binder.

      And disks for all of your software.

      Gateway used to be a good-fair PC company, honest.

  35. I know - HP WILL BUY THEM! by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Funny
    And then HP will become the BIGGEST COMPUTER MAKER in the entire WORLD!

    HP will INNOVATE and INVENT the computer of the future! While other clone makers like Dell and IBM have their computers built by third party sweatshops in China, HP will BUY Gateway, and LEAD the world into a technical future of INNOVATION and EXCELLENCE.

    RS

    ps: if HP *does* buy the rotting carcass of Gateway, I'll laugh so hard...

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:I know - HP WILL BUY THEM! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      And then HP will become the BIGGEST COMPUTER MAKER in the entire WORLD!
      HP will INNOVATE and INVENT the computer of the future! While other clone makers like Dell and IBM have their computers built by third party sweatshops in China, HP will BUY Gateway, and LEAD the world into a technical future of INNOVATION and EXCELLENCE.


      I don't know if you know this, but after the Compaq merger, HP was the largest computer maker in the world, on and off for a few quarters.

      If you ever go look at one of their workstations, like the XW9300, you'll notice that there's a lot more "innovation" there than at Dell or most other manufacturers. While most stuff is outsourced (the motherboard is Tyan, etc.), there's a lot of testing, debugging, and qualification that goes on. I personally know three people who worked on the XW9300 here in Fort Collins, doing thermal engineering (which is why the box is extremely quiet for a 2-processor, 16GB DDR, dual-GPU system), storage qualification (which found bugs in the NForce4's RAID controller), and RF/EMI testing (which is why the box doesn't blast RF like many generic systems).

      The chassis is easy to get into, almost entirely tool-less, and can even be rack-mounted. It sure as hell beats Dell's "Clamshell" design that was largely made of flimsy aluminum and plastic panels, and that was always a pain to work with. Dell's newer BTX systems are certainly better, but that has more to do with BTX than with Dell engineering.

    2. Re:I know - HP WILL BUY THEM! by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      If you ever go look at one of their workstations, like the XW9300, you'll notice that there's a lot more "innovation" there than at Dell or most other manufacturers.

      So who the fuck are you? Carly's boy toy? (badoom-tish!)
      Seriously, though - you are correct in that *LIMITED* sense re: a few of HP's offerings are worthwhile. HOWEVER: most of their crap IS made by 3rd party crap houses in China. And all the testing you talk about is of ZERO consequence when you're talking about their bread and butter products.

      By and large HP's takeover of Compaq was a hoax. The *REAL* reason was to get HP onto Compaq's HR policies, which saved the company $400m, every year, forever. This pleased the stock holders and completely fucked over the rank and file. My wife works at HP and she lost a week of vacation and ended up at the top of her pay curve after the takeover. She hasn't had a raise in 4 years, but she is one of the most productive members of her group. Why? Pay curve restrictions. She'd have to get a "different" job (i..e. more BULLSHIT than creative work) to get ANY pay raise.

      As a consequence, we've had to scale back our lives a good bit, and that pisses us both off. So, when Gateway went on the rocks, I figured: hey: another 3rd rate computer maker on the rocks - smells like blood in the water...

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  36. TVs by sootman · · Score: 1

    At least we can thank them for introducing a 42" Plasma for $3000 when they were $6-7000 everywhere else. Brought the price of all plasmas down almost overnight. Yes, they were only EDTV, and might not have been good at all, but all that mattered was the fact that consumers could say "Why should I buy your 42" for that much when they have one over here for 3 grand?" and everyone else had no choice but to follow suit.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  37. So if Gateway gets bought out by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Does that mean they'll finally get a quality control department?

  38. Institutional Insanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I used to work at a Gateway Country Store, and it was quite a learning experience. Since I was let go a week or two before Christmas I signed an agreement that I wouldn't badmouth them in exchange for severance, I must post anonymously. I'm not bitter that I was working 40 hours a week and yet was treated as a part timer because I split time between stores.

    They didn't design the stores in the best way, so the Service area was the first thing you saw when you came in. With all the paperwork (legal, etc) and Siebel crashing, backups at the front of the store were routine. The average customer waiting for service was there at least 20 minutes, and Gateway didn't even supply magazines to read. Needless to say by the time they got to the Customer Rep. they were bullshit.

    I brought this up with my Team Leader and even Christian Tortillo, who was the head of Service (hey, I was young and foolish) but they couldn't or wouldn't do a thing about it. The managers knew they were losing sales over it, too.

    Perhaps the worst offense the Service management did was intentionally understaff the department, so the average repair time was more than a week. Then they had the balls to offer "Rush Service" for "only $50 more!" Meanwhile Dell could ship the part to you and have someone install it faster.

    We were so understaffed we couldn't handle nearly any incoming calls, so people would call the Sales team for an update on their repair, and the Sales team didn't have access. Gateway's solution was "call India" but that didn't stop the calls.

    Every part from the Warranty Parts center was shipped separately, even though they did manage to have us send back the bad parts in a single box.

    They emphasised perfect diagnoses by the Techs, so if a Tech had a hard disk they thought was bad they'd slam the drive against the floor to ensure their rating would stay high.

    The worst thing was the neverending stream of FFR (Fdisk, Format, Reload) where Gateway wanted $60 per CD of data backed up. There were TWO boxes that had to be initially to OK an FFR, but in the Customer Reps. rush, and the customer who's been there for 20 minutes it would often be glanced over. The end result was anger on the customer's part: "What do you mean ALL MY DATA IS GONE?!"

    You signed here and here, see?

    Even if they brought the drive to a recovery company, Gateway had a policy of zeroing out a part of the drive anyway so the customers were fucked.

    From the year I spent there I could see the ship had been taking on water for a while. Before I worked there they used to do all service free of charge, with no electronic paperwork, and without even an option for saving data.

    I'm suprized they've survived this long.

    1. Re:Institutional Insanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You too huh? I used to work for Gateway business support in Kansas City for 3 years until they laid me off. From the time I started to the the time i left there were issues, sending replacement parts were a bitch, it was like playing russian rulette because even if you were 100% sure that it would resolve it, there was still a 40% chance they would get a bad part, we were forced to talk a customer out of the onsite that is in there warranty and get them to install that part themselves, or take it to a Country Store.

        As for data recovery, that is there own fault for not backing it up, and not reading contacts.

      In the time that I was there I knew that they were going under the only reason I stayed around is because I knew they would lay me off and apply the WARN act to the entire group.

    2. Re:Institutional Insanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they lay you off for grammar and punctuation?

    3. Re:Institutional Insanity! by GrinFranklin · · Score: 1

      What goes around comes around. After enduring Gateway's local stores which were more sizzle than substance, then enduring that totally embarrassing....painfully embarrassing ad campaign where the CEO needed the cows to tell him how to run the business...it is absolutely no surprise that they are in trouble. Computers were ok, but this is a study in marketing DISASTER.

  39. Amiga and Bankruptcy by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1
    At one point in time, Gateway bought the rights to the Amiga from Escom. Gateway is one of the few companies that hasn't gone bankrupt after buying the rights to Amiga.

    I guess the universe will eventually right itself, after all.

  40. I loved my Gateway.... by nobodynoone · · Score: 1

    ...Except for the fact the keyboard was missing an 'O' when I opened the box.

  41. all stocks, all shareholders by zogger · · Score: 1

    I've thought the same for years, there needs to be one simple change to the laws, you must hold a stock for x-years (one or two anyway) before it can be resold. That would do a tremendous amount of good to put "investing" back into the stock market as opposed to wild speculation and programmed trading, etc.

  42. Scary accurate prediction from 2003 by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take a look at this thread:

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/03/231 8204

    I've particularly liked the following post:

    >> Can Wayne Inouye Save Gateway? No!

    >> Like any desk jockey executive, he will kick back, collecting a
    >> multi-million dollar salary plus bonuses that will bankrupt the company,
    >> and laugh all the way to the bank. Gateway will be kaput by 2006, and that
    >> is a generous estimate.

  43. Ohio is a stupid place to start a business by heroine · · Score: 1

    Bangalore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Toronto, Aukland are places you start businesses. Ohio is in the middle of a united poverty disaster. Gateway was another rediculous 90's contraption to let people work wherever they wanted for no reason.

    1. Re:Ohio is a stupid place to start a business by aduzik · · Score: 1

      Except that Gateway 2000 started in Sioux City, IA, my hometown. They, very wisely, relocated to North Sioux City, just across the river in South Dakota, where the tax laws are much more favorably than they are in Iowa. As a matter of fact, when my parents lived in Sioux City, my dad used to run the cookie plant right across the street from Gateway's campus. Gateway was really quite the place, with giant cow-spotted buildings. They actually paid employees to come in on the weekends one summer and help them paint the place. My uncle worked there for a time and I got to take a tour of certain parts of the plant, including the assembly line. This was, of course, a long time ago since they haven't made a computer in the US for quite some time now.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  44. The value of a name. by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

    If you were to ask most people, I would wonder how many of them even realize the crazy computer company with the cow boxes was still in business. Maybe GW2K or whatever they want to call themselves should start putting other brands from the past on to crappy computers. Something like what GM has done. Instead of Buicks we could have Commodore, Compuadd, E-Machines, Intellivision, Sinclair, or any other defunct company. While on the subject of defunct companies, how many of these have Gateway purchased?

  45. Back to its roots by darkdante · · Score: 1

    Go back to the direct model, bring back Waitt, and try to be cool again.

    The stupidest thing I've ever seen is a company change thier name from cool to fucking lame. Biggest reason I wanted a "Gatway 2000" was because it sounded cool, sounds like a good computer, "Gateway" by itslef sounds lame and bland.

    You start going proprietary parts, you sell in retail outlets, you join up with fucking e-machines, all that ruins your reputation as a good computer maker and just makes you king of the bargin bunch. Meaning you don't make no money but sell alot of computers alla COMPAQ.

    REally sad to see this, I used to like Gateway 2000.

  46. The curse of the Amiga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The similarities to the plot of the Final Destination films are uncanny. You buy Amiga Corp and sell it off before anything "bad" happens thus cheating (financial) death but it turns out you can't cheat death after all...

  47. Hey So, with all this talk about gateway #s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just read two pages of comments about declining sales figures, market places, quality control issues, etc. etc. And, I'm left starring bleakly at my monitor wondering WHEN IN THE FUCK SOMEONE WILL ACTUALLY POST SOME GOD DAMN NUMBERS TO EITHER BACK UP OR DISPROVE THE LOOSE BOWEL EMISSIONS THAT PASS FOR DISCUSSION AT THIS ARTICLE.

    You see, it's a phenomenon that, unfortunately, I find myself running into on a rather incessant basis -- vapid talking heads spouting off anecodtes or personal opinions with no hard statistical substantive facts to foundationalize what they are saying (and this applies to both sides of the argument)

    So ... anyone care to provide 'the goods' as the expression goes? How is gateway actually doing in the marketplace? How has their quality evolved historically? How is customer satisfaction? How are profits and margins? Employment levels? Supply chain timeframes? etc. etc. etc.

    If you can't provide this substantive information, perhaps you should question the validity of your beliefs? Food for thought :)

    1. Re:Hey So, with all this talk about gateway #s by KitesWorld · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for the US market, but they've just reintroduced themselves to the UK market in style. The MX6635b had an awesome specification for it's price, and our chain was literally unable to buy them in fast enough to keep up with demand. the 3020's were selling like hotcakes too. Now discontinued - yet we still get dozens of calls asking about availability at our store alone. If gateways new models are that competetive, then they'll do well in the UK, even if the US operation flounders.

  48. It has nothing to do with debt by Teancum · · Score: 1

    Instead, the reason why U.S. manufacturing companies are moving elsewhere (both big and small) is due to a deliberate policy on the part of the U.S. Government to kill manufacturing in the USA. At least if it was policy I don't see how it would be any different.

    Besides H.R. bulls*** rules and a corporate tax system from h*** that strongly discourages innovation with a strong emphasis on short term earnings, it is no wonder that companies are leaving the USA for elsewhere.

    Where I live, the local government is quite quirky in regards to accepting companies from outside, but there is a huge manufacturing base from local citizens who simply knew how to build a better mousetrap and created a product that was better than anything else in that market. This ranges from bio-tech, heavy vehicle manufacturing, electronics, and even textiles. I have watched over the years as even these middle and sometimes even small (about 50 employees total in one company) businesses have closed up shop with only a small sales team left behind to deal with existing clients, but the manufacturing has gone elsewhere, mainly Mexico but sometimes China or Singapore as well. The ones that are left either have U.S. Government contracts where they don't necessarily have to be very cost effective and the contract requires them to make the stuff in the USA, or requires such specialized skills (often with a PhD as a minimum requirement for employment) that making the stuff can only be done here.

    It is disapointing, and eventually the USA is going to have to "pay the piper" for this loss of skills. That is the critical thing now, because many people don't even know how to manage a decent manufacturing company, and the only real growth industries are health care, law firms, and accountants. I don't know how much longer the rest of us can help support this type of service industry when there is nobody left to buy their services except each other.

  49. Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gateway is shit and the market has proved it, so STFU asshole.