Slashdot Mirror


Love in the Time of Pixels

The Escapist has piece, on this Valentine's Day, highlighting a relationship begun in a Virtual World that lead to the real life marriage of the players. From the article: "We think of these places most often as games, but there is much more going on in them than simply play. What we often forget is that any place in which two or more people can interact, whatever else it is, is a communications medium of a certain sort. Connecting via an online world - whether it's Second Life, World of Warcraft, EverQuest or any other - is not different from connecting via a chat room, via Friendster, via telephone or even in the time-honored way people sometimes connect at a party." Have you had any successful online experiences of the online variety (that you're willing to share)?

79 comments

  1. but MMORPG by cyrax777 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Many Males Online role playing Girls!

    1. Re:but MMORPG by LeeItson · · Score: 1

      Nice one.....that is one I hadn't heard yet.

    2. Re:but MMORPG by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Funny

      Many Males Online role playing Girls!

      I remember doing that when I was in my late teens and early twenties. It was funny. Of course, back then it was play-by-mail games, and BBS chats. You'd be surprised how many guys propose marriage to people they assume are girls but aren't really such.

      I used to roll a die to figure out which gender I was going to play - 1-3 male, 4-6 female - and tried to stay consistent with the persona, even when it started getting a bit silly - good thing most of my female characters had a tendency to kill off unwanted suitors at the drop of a hat.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:but MMORPG by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      I used to roll a die to figure out which gender I was going to play

      I laughed when I read this in the context of an RPG article...

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    4. Re:but MMORPG by the_tsi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh huh. And why not? Should people also be encouraged/forced to play their own species, race, and career in games? Am I some sort of deviate because my main character is a 300-pound orc who's probably too dumb to memorize an alphabet? Then why should it be a problem for someone to role play a gender they're not? The whole point of RPGs is pretending to be something different for a little while.

    5. Re:but MMORPG by Adriax · · Score: 4, Funny

      The problem isn't guys roleplaying female characters, it's guys roleplaying female players.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    6. Re:but MMORPG by eclectro · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't guys roleplaying female characters, it's guys roleplaying female players.

      I agree. I'm a firm believer that when you find out that the underwear isn't pink, you TEAM KILL!!!

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    7. Re:but MMORPG by Ransak · · Score: 1
      As a wise man once said on the now defunct lumthemad.net site,

      "They're not elves, either."

      --
      "Powers. I have them."
  2. A charming story by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and the reaction to one's words after a few slipped pixels is always a good sign.

    Now if they hadn't disabled the hack in Sims 2 with the latest patch ... well ...

    Let's just say that choosing an online avatar that actually corresponds to one's self is a good thing.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:A charming story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry for the English is not to me my first talking languages. I read your recent posting on World people often such-and-such with great interest. As you're no doubt well aware my God practically invented World people often such-and-such, and you treatment of said material would certainly upset the living daylights out of both of us. Perhaps it was the way you dealt with which that is at issue. Did you ever consider the effect on World people often such-and-such of Escapist(s)? Or even time-honored? Certainly you must agree that no reasonable treatment of World people often such-and-such is complete with a thorough understanding of Warcraft telephone. I mean, who wouldn't love a grant to study marriage Friendster? Am I right? Look, all I'm saying is that in all my days of academia, I've never been able to simply different with crunching up against society's silly hangups regarding other communications whether and Virtual. Perhaps the /. community will help us begun the Second.

  3. I know it's V-day and all... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But this isn't really all that special or new, is it?

    I met my wife on a Counter-Strike server in 2000.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    1. Re:I know it's V-day and all... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > But this isn't really all that special or new, is it?
      I met my wife on a Counter-Strike server in 2000.

      Brings whole new meaning to yelling "Boom! Headshot!", don't it?

      /one ticket to hell please

    2. Re:I know it's V-day and all... by dustmite · · Score: 1

      It sounds a bit sad to say it now, but I met my first gf on a mud, back in '95 :) A friend of mine met his wife on irc years ago too. So no, none of this seems unusual to me. I don't even agree with the premise of the story, that we "often forget", I can't imagine that anyone 'forgets', we all know full well we're interacting with other people etc.

  4. Re:This is bad for the RIAA! by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1
    A second question is how much you can learn about a potential mate from his online conduct. Does a willingness to bend the rules or make the lives of other players miserable translate into a person who will do the same in real life? I'd guess it probably does.

    Nah.

    I'm an ass in games. I talk a lot of smack, backstab, and just generally make other people miserable (if I decide I don't like them, which is more often than not). I like playing the bad guy. In real life, I'm nothing like that. I got over actually being the bad guy ten years ago.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  5. Virtual Worlds vs MMORPGs... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some people point out that in MMORPGs the women are really men. Generally, this is as we all know true.

    But one thing I've noticed about "games" like There is that the more active female players generally really are female.

    Well, at least they SOUND like women on the microphone anyway. Still, my point is generally that there seems to be a major difference in games like WoW and CoH from games like There and Second Life.

    On the other hand, the pretty, skinny, barbi-like avatars of There.Com probably don't resemble the players controlling them.

    So be careful if you fall in love with that Beauty Queen in There.Com. At least in WoW if you are in love with a cow they probably really are a cow. :)

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Virtual Worlds vs MMORPGs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boy you're lucky there are no women on slashdot, or they'd be slamming you into a rocket hole right now. they'd probably also say that the men playing men in online games probably don't resemble their avatars either.

  6. Online hookups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So how many here have found their significent other in an online game?

  7. I know it's Digital-day and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I met my wife on a Counter-Strike server in 2000."

    You downloaded your wife?

    1. Re:I know it's Digital-day and all... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      She snuck in amidst the 247 .WAV files I was downloading. By the time I realized what happened, she'd installed her stuff in my living room and everything smelled like lavender. I'm still trying to figure out how this ring got on my finger.

      The real story: We both frequented three of the same CS servers, and I was one of the few guys that didn't spaz out that she was a girl (which is why she paid any attention at all to me). Played together a lot, started voice chatting when the server was really slow, got interested. We met in person a few months after we met online. It's not every day you find a funny, game-loving web designer who also happens to be a hot chick.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:I know it's Digital-day and all... by comp.sci · · Score: 1

      A "hot chick"?
      I sure hope for you she doesnt read slashdot ;)

  8. It's always the same problem... by fak3r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!

    1. Re:It's always the same problem... by empaler · · Score: 1

      It's funny cos' it's true...

  9. Marriage is a scam by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you're planning to have children, there is no good reason to get married, especially if you are a man. Why would you? You only expose yourself to huge liabilities and risk financial ruin. If you are happy together, that ought to be enough.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:Marriage is a scam by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could always hold out for a dowry.

    2. Re:Marriage is a scam by The+Fred · · Score: 1

      Well, tax benefits is just one of many reasons, at least in Canada. By having a spouse, there are a lot of handy things on the tax form that can be used to save a lot of money both now, and after retirement.

    3. Re:Marriage is a scam by Cadallin · · Score: 1

      Generally this isn't true in the 'states. Especially with the rise of two income households, the way the tax system is structured, if you actually make enough money that you PAY taxes (rather than getting everything back at the end of the year) a couple is probably better off remaining unmarried in a financial sense. This is ESPECIALLY true if they have no children. On the other hand, you do miss out on a few of the freebies from common law, joint ownershiop, automatic inheritance, etc (Although I'm rather curious what the consequences of setting up as an business partnership would be), and the ability to not testify against each other in court. Although I'd think for pagans the last one would be kind of a non-issue. (Sure! I swear not to tell a lie on the book of yahweh *snort*) The threat of libel being pretty weak to begin with.

    4. Re:Marriage is a scam by radish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, there are a few reasons. Maybe one or both of you _want_ to be married - it may be a worthless piece of paper to you but some people like the tradition & commitment.

      In my personal case, me & my (soon to be, hopefully!) fiance have different citizenships. Being married makes it _much_ easier for us to be together in whichever country we choose.

      Anyway, I met her online (through online dating though, not a game) and today, after 2 years, I pop the question. Time will tell :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:Marriage is a scam by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Maybe one or both of you _want_ to be married - it may be a worthless piece of paper to you but some people like the tradition & commitment.

      It is not a rational commitment, and acting in accordance with a tradition that has become illogical is also irrational. In your case, the citizenship factor certainly is rational benefit that is not relevant for most people, but I don't know enough about that to know whether it would outweigh the enormous liability risks.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    6. Re:Marriage is a scam by gknoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why be married? You mean, aside from meeting someone and feeling you want to livetherest of your life with them?

      http://www.psychpage.com/family/library/brwaitgall igher.html

      Married people live longer.
      Married people have stronger finances.
      Married people have better mental health.
      Married people (statisically) have more and better sex than single people.

      And, interestingly, several of these did not really apply to couples that were merely cohabiting.

    7. Re:Marriage is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Married people (statisically) have more and better sex than single people."

      Just not with each other!

    8. Re:Marriage is a scam by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not a rational commitment, and acting in accordance with a tradition that has become illogical is also irrational

      Why on earth are you trying to apply a logic test to human relationships? That's completly irrational. If people applied economics to relationships they'd never date (bad risk/reward), never have kids (18 years+ of unrewarded expense) and only ever sleep with prostitutes (and cheap ones at that). However, most people have emotional needs which are worth far more to them than money. You're worried that you'll lose some portion of your wealth in a few years if your relationship goes south - I'd be perfectly willing to give it all up right now to be with my SO. YMMV and all that...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:Marriage is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada, after 6 months of cohabitating (and sharing the same bed) you are considered common-law married and all tax implications and liabilities are the same. This includes child support if either of you have children in your custody.

    10. Re:Marriage is a scam by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Wow, this is such a great example of how correlation is not causation. Rather than believe that a legal agreement magically bestows long life, wealth, and sexual gratification, what about the hypothesis that couples smart enough and happy enough to have long, successful marriages tend to be successful at other things as well, like budgeting and having a healthy lifestyle? Or how about the hypthesis that it's much easier to have a successful marriage when you're rich, healthy, and sexually compatible? Of course, that would ruin your magical fantasy because it implies that a successful marriage is a result - not the cause - of the factors you listed.

      I'm not saying marriage is always wrong. But I am against this kind of emotional reasoning, which is no different than religious faith, but can have huge negative consequences.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    11. Re:Marriage is a scam by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

      Congrats and good luck.

    12. Re:Marriage is a scam by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Why on earth are you trying to apply a logic test to human relationships?

      I'm not at all, I'm applying it to a legal commitment. I don't know where you got the idea that you have to marry someone to have a relationship with them.

      If people applied economics to relationships they'd never dateI agree - I propose no such thing. It's not as if I deny the value of emotions. They are valuable, and necessary. But marriage is not an emotion. It is a legal contract. That's all. I'm not arguing against love, sex, or relationships. Just legal entanglements.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    13. Re:Marriage is a scam by gknoy · · Score: 1

      A great example of how correlation is not causation.

      There IS a correlation. Whether this is caused by being married, I don't know. It's not that correlative indices are NEVER causally related, just that they are NOT NECESSARILY causally related. I haven't read the book, and know nothing about their research. But, "studies found that married people have these benefits" seems to have a pretty clear message that a healthy marriage is NOT all bad.

      What about the hypothesis that couples smart enough and happy enough to have long, successful marriages tend to be successful at other things as well, like budgeting and having a healthy lifestyle?

      That seems like a reasonable hypothesis. But, how would you test it? How do you know if someone is "smart enough/happy enough" to have a long, successful marriage, if they are not married? I can't even begin to imagine how one would conduct an experiment to verify or falsify this hypothesis.

      how about the hypthesis that it's much easier to have a successful marriage when you're rich, healthy, and sexually compatible? Of course, that would ruin your magical fantasy because it implies that a successful marriage is a result - not the cause - of the factors you listed.

      Thank you for referring to this as "my magical fantasy" -- that really added to the argument. ;-)

      As for the hypothesis -- of course it seems that it would be easier to have a successful marriage if you're rich, healthy, etc. However, there are many that are rich, healthy, and sexually compatible (I assume) that have NOT had happy marriages. Again, I'm not sure how one would test this hypothesis.

      All you seem to have done is present alternate hypotheses to what the psychologists I mentioned have proposed. You are free to do research and publish your findings when you disprove their work.

      I am not saying that they ARE right, merely that they COULD be. Since they have done a lot more research into than I have (I assume, of course -- and I know assuming risks mistaken conclusions), it seems to me that their conclusions may have some weight.

      You might be interested in Discovery Health's page on this:

      http://health.discovery.com/centers/loverelationsh ips/articles/marriage_myths.html

      It just seems that the majority of current research (as far as I can find via easy Google searches, of course ;)) indicates that a commitment to marriage has real, tangible benefits to both parties.

      Now, if you're jsut getting married for the tax benefits, or on a "Why not?" basis, and are not willing to put the work in to keep it healthy (because it DOES require work), you are much more likely to have marital problems. So ... yeah. Of course it erquires work, but if you are willing to do so, the benefits are real.

      I don't think I have presented "emotional" reasoning -- merely said "hey, several scientists believe this. Maybe it has some merit."

    14. Re:Marriage is a scam by scorp1us · · Score: 1
      Really, you are correct. Lets take a look back at marriage...
      Greek Civilization - ~1930(roughtly) - Women couldn't own property, unless it was inherited from a passing of their husband.

      1930-Today: Women own property
      1950: Birth control clears the way for women to control their reporducticve cycles, to socialize with men and to pursue careers.
      1970-Today:
      • Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) proposed. Expires unratified in 1985. Jurisprudence changed though, to include women and men.
      • Women are born under the mentality of the ERA.

      Today: we finally have women in professional careers, every bit as educated and trained as men.

      In short there is no reason to marry, except if someone stays home to raise a family. That person disengages from their career, and career development. And, if the marriage is disolved that person is at a substantial loss in the work place. Not to mention having another person to care for. Here, the courts are biased against men. They prefer to give custody to the female, even though more often the male is a better provider. This creates unbalance. Women suffer due to the bias in the courts, the men get off relatively scott free in terms of lifestyle. I wonder in the coming 50 years if women will think it is such a great idea to have ambition and property. The answer of course is individualistic. But with 85% of marriages with people people between 20 and 30 ending in divorce, society has yet to catch up to the idea that with women able to have equal opportunity, marriage isn't what it used to be.

      There is another aspect, and that the more educated a socienty is the less it reproduces. Reproduction is done recreationally, and many pairs choose to have only 1 since one can be better provided for than two (budget constraints). Some even elect to have none.

      The other side is:
      If we look back at the founding of this country, we see common law marriages. People just moved in together, had a party with a preist to pronounce them as married and that was it. Similarly, divorce was another affair for the preist.

      Low and behold, the government gets involved with marriage licenses. Originally they were used to keep white women from parrying balck men (read into that what you will) until eventually it was extended to everyone. Now the government gets to say who you can marry and when you can be divorced. (Incedentally, you create a legal fiction).

      I now am involved in a [uncontested mutually agreed upon] divorce (with no kids or joint property (This is not California)). But the government says we can't be divorced yet. Who the fuck are they to tell us when the love is over? It is because of this divorce that I became aware of all of the above. From now on, if I do get married again (and it will enirely depend on children) the government won't be involved. Just a minister and family. No government douments. Maybe a prenup to govern if there is a "divorce" but it won't be up to some judge who has no idea of the relationship and it won't be according to the term of the state.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    15. Re:Marriage is a scam by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      I don't think I have presented "emotional" reasoning -- merely said "hey, several scientists believe this. Maybe it has some merit."

      I apologize that I projected that argument onto you. I've looked at these things before, and I just haven't seen any hard evidence, or any plasusible causal explanations - at least, none more plausible than the two I posted above. Rather, I suspect that this is faith-based pseudoscience, not all that much different from creationists, that starts with the unproved assumption that marriage must be good and beneifical, and so creates results to fit that hypothesis. Nobody really wants to challenge it, because it's not very popular to be against marriage.

      I agree that the correlation does at least show that a healthy marriage is not bad. But of course, the majority of marriages are not healthy, and not because people intend to enter unhealthy marriages. It's because they make decisions based on their emotions instead of actually thinking it through like I advocate.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    16. Re:Marriage is a scam by radish · · Score: 1

      Thanks :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    17. Re:Marriage is a scam by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Also if you share a residence, you will automatically become "common-law spouses" which means even though you never had a ceremony, you are in fact married. Which means if you don't go through with the ceremony and do live together to save the expense of maintaining two separate residences, you may be liable for back taxes if you continue to file separately. Thus the financial reasons for not getting married may have a caveat "as long as you never get audited".

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    18. Re:Marriage is a scam by gknoy · · Score: 1

      starts with the unproved assumption that marriage must be good and beneifical, and so creates results to fit that hypothesis.

      That's a very interestnig possiblity; I'm sure that several have done exactly that. Good point about people not wanting to challenge something that claims that "Marriage is good". :)

      The majority of marriages are not healthy, and not because people intend to enter unhealthy marriages. It's because they make decisions based on their emotions instead of actually thinking it through like I advocate.

      I agree with your reasons for the existence of many bad marriages. Too many leap before looking, so to speak. However, ARE the majority of marriages unhealthy? I have never really looked at this.

      Hmm... thinking at the keyboard, I am, now...

      Of those people who get divorced, I think we can assume it's because they were not happy or satisfied in their relationship. Whether they were mistaken in their expectations ("work? why should it need work?"), immature, just not well-suited to their partner, or even abused, I imagine that at least one of the parties is happier un-married, or at least NOT married to the other person. I don't think that many of those (if any) would have been a "happy" marriage.

      Of marriages that do not end in divorce (or have not yet), it seems that they either are satisfied and happy, OR consider themselves "unable" to divorce -- whether because of religion, social pressure, the kids, etc.

      So ... yeah, of all the marriages that get started, it seems that a minority of them will last. However, this seems (to me) to be a product of our society's attitude towards marriage. It's considered OK to marry, decide it's not for you, and quit, and then try again. This is a VERY different attitude than what prevailed a century ago, when people were often nearly pariahs if they divorced.

      So ... I think that the proportion of marriages which are "happy" may be larger than it used to be, in that we now have an escape clause if we feel it's warranted.

      On the other hand, what does "happy" mean? We probably define it very differently now. Our ideas of family roles are different, and many people want to feel entertained, pampered, adored, and haev that "in-love" feeling, whereas in decades past, people were more accepting of the idea that it takes work and sacrifice to get the good stuff. The "in-love" feeling is mainly chemical, it's up to us to do the work to keep a relationship healthy and alive past two years. :)

      I recommend a book called "the 5 love languages", or something like that -- it's an interesting read for those who want to have lasting relationships. It really taught me a lot, hehe.

  10. Success Story by Utoxin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I met my wife in a text-based RPG called TowerMUSH. Many of my friends warned be to be extremely cautious, and even told me that it was a huge mistake. But we've been married for 7 years this June, and it's been great.

    A few pieces of advice for others who are getting into internet relationships: Don't treat them any differently from a real relationship, with one exception: Be especially wary of being lied too. The internet makes it so much easier. Also, NEVER RUSH. Me and my wife knew eachother for 4 or 5 months before we met in person for the first time. And then it was another 14 months past that before we got married. And that was 14 months of her living in the same apartment building as me while we dated and got to know eachother.

    So yes, it can work. It can be wonderful. But please, be careful. There are many real horror stories out there. My wife actually went through one before she met me. She had been engaged once before, and the guy cheated on her and used her, destroyed her credit, and then dumped her. The aftermath of that still hasn't gone away, though we're working on it slowly.

    --
    Matthew Walker
    http://www.tweeterdiet.com/ - My Diet Tracking Tool
    1. Re:Success Story by Mur! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll chime in to being another MUSH success story. Pre-graphical RPGs, we had text RPGs that meant a lot of typing and a lot of reading. The great thing about these is that you *know* the person on the other end of the character is being a character, but the longer you play with them, the better a feel you get for the kind of person they are (through grammar, language, etc). I think a lot of this gets lost in graphical RPGs.

      My husband and I met online and it was 2 years of casual chatting before we met in real life. It was 1 year of long distance dating and 2 years of living together before we actually got married. It wasn't easy or perfect, but we're coming up on our 9 year anniversary and I don't think I could have made such a good match any way else. I got to know *who* he was well before we met, and I think that strengthened our bond immensely.

  11. If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for scams by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Troll

    ah, so nice to hear from the embittered and distrustful amongst us.

    Sure, maybe it doesn't make sense to you, but noone is requiring you to get married, or even live with someone.

    Some people prefer the single life, living with thier pets or tamagotchi, able to live online at 2 am instead of having to go to bed and do unseemly things that make you all warm and fuzzy inside.

    That's the beauty of it, you get to choose. Now, in Japan, you'd be obligated to give V-Day Choco to your boss, co-workers, friends and boyfriends - and supposedly they'd give you Choco on White Day. And you'd be all stressed out by the whole thing. There V-Day is more of an event than Christmas is for us. And New Years has more meaning.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  12. Been there, done that -- in 1990 by cwford · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I met my future wife online in 1985. We both ran local BBSs, spent long hours chatting and a relationship quickly developed.

    We were married online in Dec. 1990. The pastor and both of us called a multi-line BBS and had several friend join as witnesses. The service was done and we were married. Later that night, we have a service IRL just to placate the family and all, but we all signed a document and had it notarized stating that our official wedding took place online.

    Evidently someone saved a transcript for posterity's sake and it surfaced on the web a few years ago:

    http://www.skepticfiles.org/aj/wed_b&c.htm

  13. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by amliebsch · · Score: 1
    Sure, maybe it doesn't make sense to you, but noone is requiring you to get married, or even live with someone.

    I understand nobody is forcing it, but I am making a stronger argument than that it doesn't make sense to me. I am saying that many people choose to do it when it doesn't make sense, objectively. I am not distrustful, just skeptical. And I am definitely not embittered. But I am rational, and there is little or no rational justification for many marriages.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  14. Results Not Always So Good by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I played AC for a while. There was one woman with two kids. She was single. She essentially hop-scotched with her kids in tow from one bad relationship to another that she initiated through the game.

    I think several of them resulted in pretty fast marragies and fast marriage endings (I can't spell marraige, sorry). In one case she deleted of one of the guys players.

    Apparently she was somewhat cute and somewhat charming - not really devious, just a nut case.

    Normally I wouldn't have cared at all, but I found it particularly disturbing that she had children and was dragging them through all of this with her.

    Ok - not so great a V day story, but the other side of the coin I suppose.

  15. This is hardly new. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Back in the 90's I mudded a lot, which was effectively MMORPG without the graphics and there where people who would wander off to some secluded corner of the mud and chat and kiss and emote and all that. They often would group together. Some even, myself included, would travel hundreds of miles for face to face meetings with other mudders of the same game. I know some romances sprung that way, others died (when people finally met the person they thought was clearly someone else.)

    What was always amazing to me was the people who were married, raising kids, etc. who could still find time for 3-8 hours of mudding each day. I really expect that is not unlike today, with graphics added.

    Lastly, to commemorate the day, a p03m I typed on /. 6 years ago:

    Roses are red, Violets are blue, All my base, Are belong to you!
    Dedicated to all the friends I made online over the years and haven't seen since.
    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:This is hardly new. by Samus · · Score: 1

      You can get that in a T-Shirt these days too. Though to be a bit more geeky the colors are replaced with their hex equivalents.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    2. Re:This is hardly new. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can get that in a T-Shirt these days too. Though to be a bit more geeky the colors are replaced with their hex equivalents.

      Yes. I couldn't help but notice they lifted my poem. ThinkGeek is connected with /.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  16. How I met my wife to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After 4 long term relationships over the past 15 years with people I met in bars, pubs, clubs and even Athens airport (the longest of the 4) I'm finally marrying in June the woman I met on a dating website. Make of that what you will..

  17. Something "The Escapist" should have known by XenoRyet · · Score: 1
    Yes, MMOs are a perfectly good communications medium, and you can interact with others fairly well. Even better than chat or other digital, text-based means.

    The problem with meeting your signifigant other on an MMO or other game is that people generaly play games to escape from real life. MMO's in particual, people play to act out a role they don't get to in real life. The percentage of people who are acting anything like their real life personality is very small.

    I'm sure there are exceptions, but in the general case I would think it is a bad idea to base a real life relationship on interaction in a world that is detached, and fundamentaly different than the real one. A world who's purpose is to escape from the real one. Such a relationship would be as fragile as any other relationship that is built on false pretenses, even if they both have the best of intentions.

    --
    If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
  18. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Godeke · · Score: 1

    "when it doesn't make sense, objectively"

    If you can't read that and understand why people get married, then you will enjoy a long, prosperous and emotionally empty life. See, there is more to life than the rational, the cost benefit analysis and love falls in that domain. I'm sure when you present that argument to a girlfriend, she gets all *tingly* inside knowing that objectivity trumps emotion. Oooh baby, now that's romance.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  19. Re:Something "The Escapist" should have known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I met someone on DALnet and had known that for about 3-4 years beforehand and then she moved across the country near me and we went to college together and were together for about 5 years. She discovered MMORPGs and never turned back. I got into it as well (grudgingly grinding in Lineage), but I grew tired of it but she didn't. She was consumed with it. Ironically, similar mediums through which our relationship had start was a key part in our end.

    At least I don't have to listen to that god damn annoying game-speak anymore...

  20. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Except that marriage is a legal concept that has, in the last 100 years or so, been quickly transformed into a marketing transport which utilizes the idea of a centuries old tradition of marriage for love. When in actuality, the real reason for getting married is the gaining of legal priviledges and obligations. "living together forever" doesn't necessitate marriage, but living a fantasy implanted in our collective social matrix in order to sell any variety of goods and services is a brilliant idea.

    My main beef, really, is against large, expensive, fantastical weddings. If people wanna elope, I'm all for it.

    But never make the mistake of thinking that marriage is an institution based on love. It is, has been, and always will be steeped in laws and legality.

  21. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by amliebsch · · Score: 1
    I'm sure when you present that argument to a girlfriend, she gets all *tingly* inside knowing that objectivity trumps emotion.

    There is a time and place for emotions - life certainly would be empty without them. However, I do not believe that making lifelong legal commitment decisions is one of those times or places. Love is an emotion, and it is a relevant consideration, but it is not itself a source of knowledge, truth, or wisdom.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  22. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By your logic, you are against transportation by any automobile only because someone bought a $200,000 Ferrari.

    What a sad and stupid life you must lead.

  23. Don't forget pre-3D methods! by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

    I met my boyfriends partially via online gaming. I knew them in other online contexts, but it was on a MUCK they started that things really began to happen. Things are going well but we're not at the point of marriage quite yet, either ceremonial or legal - the former probably being more likely than the latter, as America has this silly issue with families made of more than two consenting adults.

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
  24. Met my wife on a MUD by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

    We were both working on an RP-centric MUD (I as programmer, her as lead builder), when we met.

    It started as one of my friends asking "What do you want for your birthday?" and I replied "To meet a girl who likes science fiction." Turns out she was online and listening to the chat at that moment...

    --
    Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
  25. Personal Experience by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

    My wife once dated someone she met online- it was one of the stupidest things she's ever done. However, if she had met and dated him offline, it wouldn't have been any smarter. A few of my other friends have "dated" people they met online- but the relationship rarely survived a single real life meeting, if they got that far. An unamed friend of mine brought a online date home once- only to have his date hit on his roommate the entire visit. Not surprisingly, that ended things rather quickly. Like offline dating, online dating is more likely to end badly than end well. It's just easier to tell whether or not things will go well if you are actually able to be with the person instead of merely talking to them.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  26. HotOrNot success by zapp · · Score: 1

    One month ago today (Valentines day), I had a double match with my girlfriend, and we've spent almost every day since then together, or at least talking. It was pretty random, but it worked, and we're a pretty good match.

    I've also built some very close friendships with people I've never met or even talked on the phone with, on chatrooms.

    --
    no comment
  27. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Godeke · · Score: 1

    "Love is an emotion, and it is a relevant consideration, but it is not itself a source of knowledge, truth, or wisdom."

    You sure know how to keep those sweet nothings coming, don't you Vulcan boy? I'm not going to argue with someone who is quite clearly living in terror, especially if that is what makes you happy. I'll just say that I'm quite happy in my marriage, and clearly you wouldn't be happy in one. Live long and prosper, however your boat gets floated.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  28. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    What makes you think I am living in terror? I would argue that, if anything, deliberately blinding oneself to the cold reality of facts indicates terror.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  29. Another "me too!" by llevity · · Score: 1
    I met my wife before it was a stigma to meet and date someone online. As if meeting someone in a bar is somehow better? But anyway, I digress.

    It was back on a MMORPG precursor -- a MUD -- and have been happily together for 8 or 9 years now.

    We currently play WoW together, and are the leaders of a medium sized casual guild. We're not an oddity either. Unless we just attract married couples, we have 5 other husband/wifes that are in our guild. That's 12 people out of probably 35 folks that are married and game together. At least two of those other pairs met on an online game. We also have another pair that met in WoW and are currently dating.

    I don't agree with the arguments that some others have posted that people don't act like themselves in games, and thus it's a bad way to meet people. Granted, there is use of the game as an escape mechnism, to get away from real life and do things you can't do or wouldn't do in person.

    The thing is, you belong to a community. In smaller settings, such as smaller guilds, or a friendlist of people you commonly group with, the real you comes out. You talk about your day. You perform small acts of kindness, whether it's passing on the uber robes to your friend, or lending some gold, or helping with a quest. You tell jokes.

    Yes, you can still be the sneaky deceitful rogue in groups with random strangers, or be a berserking, rampaging warrior screaming defiance as you wade through slashing up the fields of the opposing faction on the battlefield, but within the smaller setting of your guild, or your group, or your friends, you ARE yourself.

    Yes, there is still the possibility of deceipt. You could act like something you're not in order to lure or attract the interest of someone else. But that exists in real life. You might modify your behavior in order to better fit in with the crowd, or wear a mask that makes you seem something you aren't, but that too exists in real life.

    My point is that I think MMORPGs very closely mirror the way people act in real life. It all just varies with the context. You're a nice guy, sure, but when anonymous, I'm sure you've done not nice things. Safe with the anonymity of just another car in a busy traffic jam? You've probably flipped someone off or called them a dirty word, when you'd never do the same when your family or boss was with you.

  30. E-Harmony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word ppl: E-Harmony
    Check it out. Far less of a crap-shoot than meeting someone through a game.
    Seriously.

  31. Yet another anecdote: Halo by soren.harward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So my friend was a pretty good Halo player. Good enough to win some local competitions. One night, his roommate's sister showed up with some of her friends. My friend and his roommate were playing, and after the round ended one of the girls asked if she could play against my friend. He patronizingly said, "Sure? You know how to play?"

    "Well, it's been a while, but the controls should come back to me."

    "Okay, I'll go easy on you for a bit."

    Big mistake. I heard from everyone else in the room that by the time he hit 10 frags, she was already over 50.

    Six months later they got married. He can usually win in Warcraft, but she still hands him his ass in any FPS.

  32. My sister in law by toybuilder · · Score: 1

    About 7 years ago, I moved back to Los Angeles for work. My brother was going to law school in downtown L.A., so we decided to share an apartment.

    A week after he moved in, he complained that we only had one phone line and that I would be tying up the phone line to dial in to work. I tried to calm him down with the fact that I was going to get a cablemodem service and that we'd have a 24x7 fast connection... To which he sarcasticall said something like "oh, so that you can find a woman online... well, she's actually going to be some bald guy named Bob..."

    When the cablemodem arrived, I reconfigured his laptop so that he could use his AOL account via broadband... Less than two weeks later, I barely saw him because he would march straight into his bedroom after getting home and start typing away...

    About two months later, he says: "Uhm, there are some ladies visiting LA from San Francisco - can they crash at our place?" It turned out that he made friends with female law students in one of AOL's chatrooms. And from many late-night chat sessions (first about law, and then about "stuff", and then more and more personal interactions), they went on to phone calls, and then dating.

    Anyway, long story short, they got engaged about 3 years later. Whenever anyone asked, they said that they met through a mutual friend. Only a few of us knew the real story behind their introduction. For the wedding reception, my sister-in-law-to-be demanded that I do NOT tell the audience on how they met... Being a good brother-in-law-to-be, I demurred.

    But my brother's best friend had a few of us nearly rolling on the floor when he gave a long toast to the newlyweds. He declared that their marriage was possible because of an Abundance Of Love... And then went on for five minutes on many examples of AOL bringing them together!

    The two of them are very well suited to each other. It's almost scary how well matched they are. If it wasn't for the online connection, they probably would never have met. It worked for them!

  33. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Godeke · · Score: 1

    I'm quite clear on the reality, having been divorced once (and won sole custody of my son and garnered zero financial or other obligations due to my divorce). You on the other hand have convinced yourself of the terrible plight of a male who marries. It is a plight that can be avoided by arranging things prior to the marrage properly. No, I'm not afraid: I faced the situation and came out victorious. You, on the other hand, appear afraid to try, which is the worst type of fear.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  34. Meeting online isn't a shortcut by Aero · · Score: 1

    It's just another medium for people to come together socially, on a par with bars, clubs, personal ads, churches, parties, or any of the other myriad ways in which people meet and end up pursuing romance. Unlike those media, it comes with a bandwidth limitation on your personal interaction: you miss out on a lot of the non-verbal elements of communication. This isn't a problem if you're aware of it. But you get a lot of poor saps who mistake this throttling of bandwidth for an increased level of intimacy, leading to the many stories of disappointment resulting from meeting the online flame in real life.

    I met my girlfriend 12 years ago on a talker. We ended up going our separate ways (romantically; we stayed friends for a while) because neither of us felt that we were good enough for the other, and we both ended up in marriages that ended badly. Through a few twists of fate, we ended up back in contact, started dating, and have been living together for just over a year now. It's taken the last 3+ years to turn the idealized images we had of each other back when we first met into real images of each other, images that we've both gladly decided that we can live with.

    That pattern is the exception. Most relationships that start online involve people who think that they're seeing the "true" self of the other, since online communication can strip away a lot of facades. But the facades that we put on are part of who we are as well...take that away, and you're missing out on the complete person. And it's the complete person that you'll end up trying to make a life together with, not their online presence.

    --
    We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.
  35. A little twist in *my* MMORPG Valentine by empaler · · Score: 1

    I was playing City of Villains when my girlfriend came home from the supermarket and asked me to help her putting groceries into the fridge... and then I found a Nintendo DS in the bottom of her bag =D

  36. *Yawn*. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    This has been going on for decades - our local fishwrap is carrying the story to of one couple who via a pen-pal club in the 50's. I'm old enough to remember folks meeting via CB. I have a buddy who met his wife because he called her when working as a telemarketer!

    Nothing new here, nothing to see. Move along.

  37. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Godeke · · Score: 1

    http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=12079750184124 94804

    http://amliebsch.yafro.com/profile

    Dude, you need to know that even if you choose different user names (which shows at least some geek cred) for different systems, *don't* link them.

    Geeze.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  38. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    My main beef, really, is against large, expensive, fantastical weddings. If people wanna elope, I'm all for it.

    No argument here.

    People could get married like they do in France or Denmark, a small civil wedding, a nice meal at home with friends and family, and then use the money they would have spent on these insane weddings Americans do to buy a new house together, or get the down payment on one.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  39. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by amliebsch · · Score: 1
    Mmm...I'm supposed to care because I'm terrified, right?

    Well, if that belief makes you happy, I won't disabuse you of it.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  40. Successful Online Hookup by _hAZE_ · · Score: 1

    My wife and I met on IRC around 10 years ago. We've been together for 7 years, and married for 3. We also have a 4 month old son. I'd say things turned out pretty well.

    --

    Don Head
    UNIX/Linux Administrator
  41. Common-law spouse by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    Same in Australia. After a certain period of living together, you're considered as good as married anyway. The legal & tax benefits and liabilities are pretty much identical.

    I swore I'd never get married, who needs the complications if you break up? Then I realised it made no difference. I eventually got married a few years later, for the extra commitment factor & to provide a slightly more "normal" family for my upcoming children. 12 years on, no regrets.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  42. Re:If Marriage is a scam, then I'm a sucker for sc by Godeke · · Score: 1

    No, no, no. Because resorting to singles sites is hysterical.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  43. Post your online engagement story by NoInfo · · Score: 1

    We'd love to hear about your online engagement stories, too.

    Post them here at the AppleBride wedding encyclopedia (like wikipedia):
    http://www.applebride.com/pages/Online_engagement_ story