Slashdot Mirror


10 Best S/F Films That Never Existed

Jamie mentioned (via a Metafilter discussion) a great article entitled The 10 Best Sci-Fi Films that Never Existed. From the piece: "There was a movie that perfectly captured the Douglas Adams experience, the combination of bitter sarcasm and sharp imagination, the droll British wit and whale-exploding slapstick that infused his novels. And that movie was Shaun of the Dead. That movie was not, unfortunately, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, a movie that floated around Hollywood for about 20 years before it finally appeared in theaters as a flat, lifeless, americanized lump that was mostly hated by people who liked the book and loathed by people who hated the book. "

41 of 647 comments (clear)

  1. Oopsie. by robyannetta · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They forgot one: Neuromancer by William Gibson.

    As a filmmaker, and after reading this book cover to cover many times, I've come to the assumption that this book is truly unfilmable. I have read a few scripts based upon it found on the 'web, one particular written by Gibson himself, but there is just absolutely no way to capture the depth of environment this novel creates.

    I don't care how big your budget is, it "ain't gonna happen."(tm)

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:Oopsie. by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It has already been made, and it's called Blade Runner. Gibson was working on Neuromancer when the film came out, and he came out of the theatre buzzing. It was exactly the world he envisioned for Neuromancer.

    2. Re:Oopsie. by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, I don't think Neuromancer is unfilmable. You want unfilmable, try Vernor Vinge's A Deepness In The Sky.

      The principal protagonists are giant hairy carnivorous alien spiders. And you're rooting for them all the way.

    3. Re:Oopsie. by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Informative

      Neuromancer began the whole shades-and-black cyberpunk style, which pervades The Matrix. Much of The Matrix owes debts to an anime film called Ghost in the Shell. They might be major influences, but The Matrix had many, many more. That's not a bad thing - it's probably what made the first movie good, and the rest terrible.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Oopsie. by imgumbydammit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny that you should mention Vernor Vinge. Read his story True Names (published years before), then read Neuromancer again. Neuromancer seems like a bit of a rip off.

      --
      That's right: I'm gumby dammit.
  2. The Dialogue to this article ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Funny

    A: Do you remember seeing that one?
    B: No
    A: Me neither ... but it was good
    B: Yeah, Totally

  3. No it wouldn't.... by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Re: Snow Crash:

    It's so cinematic that I didn't just desperately want a movie to be made from it, I was always shocked they didn't make one.

    Nope, a Neal Stephenson movie wouldn't work for the same (real) reason The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy didn't work. The joy of those books is in the expository language. Even the best adaptation would still disappoint the hardcore fans.

    Imagine turning the Cap'n Crunch seen in Cryptonomicon into a movie -- Randy Waterhouse eats a bowl of cereal in a Manila hotel room. Woohoo!

    1. Re:No it wouldn't.... by ectizen · · Score: 3, Informative
      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=OMT FG


      Now *that's* a god I could believe in.

      Why wasn't this mentioned in Sunday school?!
  4. gibson + movie = horror by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least Gibson's treatment for Neuromancer didn't get filmed. His script for Johnny Mnenomic did, and it was a complete and total atrocity.

    (That said, his script for Alien 3 would probably have been better than the abortion that Fincher foisted off on us.)

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:gibson + movie = horror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Gibson's script is nothing like the finished movie, which was taken AWAY from director Robert Longo by Sony Pictures. Read Gibson's published screenplay for Johnny Mnemonic, as well his blog. Your comments are ignorant and lame. Johnny Mnemonic could've been great if Sony hadn't decided to re-maked totally unlike the writer and director had intended. In fact, there may still be a great film lying around in Sony's vault - assuming the original footage hasn't been lost.

      Let's go, Sony. Give us the complete Director's Dut of Johnny Mnemonic. Until then, read Gibson's published screenplay and weep for what might have been...

  5. As an independent filmmaker... by dex22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...who has struggled for years to fund my various off-the-wall projects, like Best Served Cold I know how hard it is to do anything different.

    I've been working on the project that follows BSC for a year now. It's a cheesy B movie pisstake with zombies and alien bugs, and it'll be a scream. But can I get funding? No! My low budget productions are well made and funny as hell, but fundraising when you're deliberately making cheesy movies, or movies with gorgeous fat chicks, well, it's tough.

    Anyone got $15,000 I can use? :)

    1. Re:As an independent filmmaker... by radish · · Score: 5, Funny

      Two suggestions:

      (a) Move to Germany
      (b) Change your name to Uwe Boll

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:As an independent filmmaker... by dex22 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...but I just:

      a) moved to Austin, TX, from England
      b) changed my name to Robert Rodriguez!

  6. In a world... by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a post-apocalyptic world where websites mysteriously drop from existance, server hardware is reduced to mere slag and ISP lawyers roam the shattered earth a hero shall rise.

    Coming this summer from Forks Searchlight Entertainment:
    ths slashdotting

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  7. Classics by Belseth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Guess they weren't concerned with novels. Little things like Mote In God's Eye and Ringworld. Even Lucifer's Hammer blew away any of the meteor films that got made, although many stole from it. Science fiction novels done properly for cinema are virtually nonexistent. There are rare exceptions like 2001 but the script was by the writer of the novel and Directed by Kubrick of coarse.

    1. Re:Classics by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Informative
      There are rare exceptions like 2001 but the script was by the writer of the novel and Directed by Kubrick of coarse.
      Actually, that's not true at all. Kubrick wrote the script, and Clarke wrote the novel - in parallel. Clarke's writings make it quite clear that his contributions to the screenplay were minimal and that Kubrick's contributions to the novel were equally minimal, even though they extensively borrowed from each other..
  8. Matrix sequels sucked because... by IAAP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the Wachowskis thought that people went to see the movies because of the Car chases, bullets flying, and the Kung Fu fight scenes. Maybe some people did. But what got me hooked on the first was things like this line, "Knowing the path is different from walking the path." I thought, "Ooooo" these guys are going to do something different and possibly something that has a deeper meaning than, blam-blam-blam-blamblam-blam". But noooo, that's not how it turned out. And if they did it the way I thought they were going to do it, it would have cost much less and they would have made more money.

  9. Another example: Robert E. Howard vs. Ahnold by el+borak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although I'm sure many only know the character of Conan from John Milius' big screen romp with steroid-giant Ahnold (or possibly from the even more wretched TV series or the comic books), no one has yet had the guts to film a real movie based on the original Robert E. Howard stories from the 1930's.

    The real REH Conan wasn't the dumb as a board Ahnold, he was a multilingual leader of men, an accomplished horseman, a stealthy and dextrous thief, and many other things that neither Milius nor Ahnold understood (and still don't to this day). He was a product of the pulp era and the Great Depression. He was the toughest guy not because he was chained (for no apparent reason) to a wheel for his entire life, but because he had survived as only the fittest did in his environment.

    Hollywood very rarely avoids the trap of going for the "easy story". Why create a complex character that is truly interesting when a one-dimensional revenge-fest is so much easier to explain to a suit? Why respect the original stories when just grabbing the trademark name to use for promotion takes less time? Why cast an actor who can actually act when a steroid-giant looks so cool on screen?

    I've given up on any story or book adaptation ever coming close to the original and hence am no longer disappointed. And that way I enjoy the very rare occasions when they do actually get it right. But for every Maltese Falcon there are hundreds of I, Robots.

    --
    An imperfect plan executed violently is far superior to a perfect plan. -- George Patton
  10. A comment and a revision by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Informative

    Alien 3 was further brutalized by the studio cut that utterly ripped the guts out of the film. If you haven't already, go and watch the Director's Cut on the Quadriology (you can often rent it by itself). The film is infinitely better, and actually works as a small, dark, claustrophobic piece. It's not what fans were promised, it's not what they were expecting, it's not what should have been filmed. But it works. That's tough to admit, but it's nice to find a silver lining to the nightmare that was the movie's production.

    Which brings me to...Alien 5

    Since in the minds of Alien fans, Alien Vs. Predator simply does not exist, Alien 5 was intended to be something along the lines of what Alien 3's teaser promised. Long story short: James Cameron and Ridley Scott went to the studio with the pitch, the studio told them they were going to do A vs P instead, Cameron told them if that movie was made, he would walk. You know the rest. The film is officially, 100% dead.

  11. Google Cache by netfool · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google Cache

    Plus, I just have to copy and paste this quote for Snow Crash, I think it's hilarious because it's completely true:

    "Until a man is twenty-five, he still thinks, every so often, that under the right circumstances he could be the baddest motherfucker in the world. If I moved to a martial arts monastery in China and studied real hard for ten years. If my family was wiped out by Colombian drug dealers and I swore myself to revenge. If I got a fatal disease, had one year to live,devoted it to wiping out street crime. If I just dropped out and devoted my life to being bad."

    So true, so true.

    --
    Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
  12. Re:THGTTG by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The movie was acceptable, but for me the biggest "gotcha" was the total lack of comprehension of British humor by the directors.

    The most obvious example was Arthur Dent's conversation with Processor, or lack thereof. Of course, naming the ex-President Hamma Kavula (or however it is spelled) was seriously funny.

    And the whole scene with the Total Perspective Vortex which was a gun, where Zaphod gets "enlightened" was Hollywood-romance drivel. "Hey, I'm Zaphod Beeblebrox, man!"

    The absolute worst was the !)@#!ing 2+ minute opening scene of jumping dolphins! What a waste of celluloid!

    It just could have been so much better in the hands of a director who had a sense of humor that didn't need a laugh track to tell him what was funny.

      -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  13. Cap'n Crunch. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Imagine turning the Cap'n Crunch seen in Cryptonomicon into a movie -- Randy Waterhouse eats a bowl of cereal in a Manila hotel room. Woohoo!
    Yes, imagine it. Imagine trying to convey the sense that this guy has some serious issues using only his cereal ritual.

    I'd film it by putting a digital clock on the table. Hook the clock to a sensor pad. The clock starts when he puts the milk on it. Focus on how he keeps his eyes on the clock while eating.

    Then, have the phone ring. He turns to the phone and drops his spoon. He reaches down to get the spoon, gets a bit frantic when he can't grab it, then grabs it and comes up. He stares at the timer.

    "Fuck....."

    Then he gets up, washes out the bowl, focus on all the cereal in the sink's drain. He dries the bowl. He dries the spoon. Then he takes them over to the table again.

    He fills the bowl with cereal, re-sets the timer, looks up, goes to the phone and carefully unplugs it and wraps the cord around the receive. Then he goes back to the table and reaches for the milk ...

    Don't focus on eating the cereal. Focus on the person who has a ritual that complicated just for eating cereal. Focus on the effects that interupting that ritual has on that person.
  14. Best quote from the article by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone remembers the exact moment when they realized that their Phanom Menace sandwich was filled with shit.

    I think that would make a good Slashdot poll. When did you realize that George Lucas had defecated on your childhood memories?

    - Opening sequence: "The taxation of trade routes to outlying systems is in dispute."
    - First appearance of Jar Jar
    - First mention of midi-chlorians
    - The creepy virgin birth thingy
    - First appearance of the annoying brat who played young Anikin
    - First appearance of the wooden teen-aged brat who played older Anikin
    - ???

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Best quote from the article by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First mention of midi-chlorians

      That had to do it for me. I was under the assumption anyone could be a Jedi if they just tried hard enough and not because of some noble upbringing or good genetics.

      Secondly, it added nothing to the movie. It isn't as if we didn't already have some knowledge of what the force was coming from the first three movies. I mean they could just have wandered by and said "I feel a strong presence in the force with this child" or something like that. Not this "let me whip out my tricorder and talk about something that wasn't mentioned in the first three films.

      Those are one of the things I hope George takes out in the first movie. Heck... Why doesn't George just do them all over again.

      "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!", pretty much sums up my Star Wars I,II,III experience.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Best quote from the article by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You know what would have worked, if Lucas wanted to do prequels, is, say, a movie dedicated towards the ancient history; say a movie about the first confrontations between the Jedi and the Sith. A second could deal with the rise of the Republic, and then one single movie to deal with Anakin becoming Darth Vader.

      The way I figure it, Episode I was a total waste of time. It was dull, badly written, poorly acted and just generally no damned good. What Liam Neeson was doing in this movie I'll never understand, and the introduction of idiocies like midichlorians and Anakin-as-Jesus-virgin-birth crap was nonsensical, and would require the most bizarre explanation for Anakin's brother Owen in the next film.

      Episode II just didn't seem to know where to go. Did it want to be Obiwan's detective story? Did it want to be the love affair between Anakin and Padme? About Anakin's descent into the dark side? The Sith's bizarre machinations (including a Sith apprentice who tells Anakin that "oh yeah, the Sith control the Senate")? Or is it a political thriller? It wanted to go so many places in two hours that it ultimately went very little distance at all. One way to have patched things up would have been for Anakin to become Darth Vader at the end of that film, which would have made the next film much more interesting.

      Episode III. As close as we'll ever get in Lucas's post-1980s world to a good Star Wars film. Still clunky, but at least the Emperor comes off interesting (by now he's clearly the only character in the prequels that is really all that interesting). Still, way too much deux ex machina. Anakin still seems to sort of abruptly become Darth Vader rather than a slow descent into evil (which is why I think the more natural transition would have been at the end of Episode II). The whole "my apprentice is in trouble" which gets the Emperor on a ship to fly to Vader's aid was the worst example. The ending was idiotic, the Darth Vader suit sequence seeming anticlimactic, and the whole bit about Padme dying not only ridiculously maudlin but making the Epside VI statement by Leia that she could still remember her mother rather odd, considering Luke didn't.

      I think Lucas's whole reason for making Star Wars films changed between 1976-1983 and the 1990s. The earlier films, even as they got a bit deeper and more philosophical on the nature of evil in the Star Wars' universe, still maintained a fun, swashbuckling feeling. The plot holes in Episode VII could be ignored because, goddamnit, those Ewoks were cute, the Millenium Falcon was way cool flying into the Death STar, and the Emperor was so fucking evil in a basic, elemental fashion, rather than as some political plotter more in the line of Idi Amin than a Dark Lord holding extraordinary powers.

      I think Lucas decided to take his space opera and turn it into some sort of political parable. The problem is that Lucas isn't a very good writer, so loads of nonsense like midichlorians get loaded into the brew just so he can progress his almost-plot with as little effort as possible. He's so busy with his wannabe-political-philosophy nonsense that he forgets that a movie has to be interesting, whether it aspires to greater things or not.

      Lucas is a good idea man, or was, but ultimately, his instincts are all wrong. He overestimated his abilities as writer, and misjudged want the fans wanted. The fans didn't want The Galactic Manchurian Candidate, but rather Star Wars, as they saw it between 1977 and 1983.

      I disagree with the article that the prequels were a bad idea, though they clearly would have the limitation that we all know Anakin turns into Darth Vader. There's no "Wow, Luke is Vader's son" or "Hey, Darth Vader ain't so bad after all" moments. Those that read the original novel adaptations even knew basically how Anakin received the injuries. I really think that the entire Anakin-Darth Vader could have been done in a single movie, and without all the virgin-birth nonsense. Two other movies could have given us a better background of the Jedi-Sith struggles and the Republic.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Best quote from the article by servognome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know what would have worked, if Lucas wanted to do prequels, is, say, a movie dedicated towards the ancient history; say a movie about the first confrontations between the Jedi and the Sith. A second could deal with the rise of the Republic, and then one single movie to deal with Anakin becoming Darth Vader.

      I think that would be way too much history to cover with only 3 movies. One of the things I liked about the OT was that it didn't try to tell the whole story of the rebellion, it focused on the adventures of a few key characters. The civil war served as a backdrop, with the story threads winding in and out of it. So you end up with a grand universe that allows for many interesting stories to be told in the EU in parallel with the OT events.

      I agree with your description of the first 2 prequels. The problem I had with those movies, is that there was no sense of history (the OT had allusions to the republic, clone wars, etc), the universe seemed revolve around the main characters. That is what made them so shallow, Lucas tried to handhold the story of the creation of the empire entirely through a handful of characters. The thrid prequel had more of that sense of "a grand universe" that was in the OT.

      I think Lucas decided to take his space opera and turn it into some sort of political parable. The problem is that Lucas isn't a very good writer, so loads of nonsense like midichlorians get loaded into the brew just so he can progress his almost-plot with as little effort as possible. He's so busy with his wannabe-political-philosophy nonsense that he forgets that a movie has to be interesting, whether it aspires to greater things or not.

      If he was a good writer the prequels could have been very interesting. He does bring up several good points on the failure of democracy during crisis, liberty vs security, law vs morality, but ends up skimming over them. The prequels could have been filled with political intrigue, backstabbing, the grey of good vs evil. After watching the TV series "Rome" on HBO, I thought a similar story would have been great for the prequels. The underlying elements were similar (political disputes, assassination, self-interest, etc) just Star Wars didn't make it interesting.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:Best quote from the article by sd_diamond · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First appearance of the wooden teen-aged brat who played older Anikin

      Don't be so hard on him. Hayden Christensen is actually a good actor. As are Natalie Portman, Samuel Jackson, Ewan MacGregor, Liam Neeson and Jimmy Smits. But their performances in the Star Wars prequels all uniformly sucked. Only one person can ultimately be blamed for that.

    5. Re:Best quote from the article by imadork · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Are people still worked up about this midi-chlorian shit? That's the part of the prequels that bothered me the least. I do at least understand why you're all pissed. Who would have ever thought that a mystic bad-ass Jedi Knight would have essentially whipped out a tricorder and punched a few buttons to get the answer? It just seems wrong, right?

      You see, that's the whole point -- it was wrong. The Jedi Order from the prequels was getting a little too big for its britches, a little too political, a little too technical. They were starting to abandon the mystical connection to the Force in favor of things that they could see and measure. As a result of this, they started to miss the whole point of this Force business, and the only way to rescue things and "bring balance" was to fucking kill them all, and start over from scratch.

      At least, that's how I would have wrote it.

  15. good author by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So what happened?

    The Chicago Cubs, that's what. The Cubs haven't won a World Series since 1908. Why? Because Cub fans sell out Wrigley Field every game, regardless of how bad the team is. Management makes money regardless of whether or not the team is winning, so why bother?

    Likewise, studios think video game fans will pile into the theater on opening weekend regardless of whether or not any effort was put into the film. Will that change? Come ask me after I've seen the Peter Jackson-produced Halo.


    this author, davd wong, good author. i've seen people say the same thing he just said, but less effectively, with ten more sentences to play with. he gets big ideas across forcibly and quick. sign of a good author
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  16. Some biggies... by Foo2rama · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forget Doom...

    Enders Game
    Stranger in a Strangeland - purchased by Tom Hanks is the rumor
    The Cat who could Walk Through Walls - Heinlin again
    I have no mouth and I must Scream - Ellison

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  17. Missing Option by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    - Greedo shot first.
    - Han Solo steps on Jabba's tail without getting killed.*
    - BS explosion rings from the Death Stars.
    - Ewoks Cartoon.
    - Droids Cartoon.
    - Star Wars Christmas Special.
    - Ewoks instead of Wookies on Endor in RotJ.

    My personal pick is when Greedo shot first.

    (* Yes I know that it was because when they originally filmed the deleted scene Jabba was a man instead of a slug-like alien and Harrison Ford moved around him in ways that didn't work later, but this did sort of help break suspension of disbelief.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Missing Option by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Han Solo steps on Jabba's tail without getting killed.

      I think that's actually worse than Greedo shooting first. Sure, the Greedo scene undermines Han as cold-blooded-badass-and-not-necessarily-a-good-guy , but on the plus side it does emphasise his leet smuggler's reflexes: Greedo fires, Han gets his head out of the way of the bolt so fast even a Jedi could hardly follow it, and next thing you know Greedo's toast. Han's a dangerous guy to cross. Very Clint Eastwood.

      The scene with Jabba, though... he's trying to talk his way out of a deep, deep hole. Han owes Jabba money. Jabba's already sent murderous bounty hunters after him. Han needs to talk Jabba around. We're talking edgy diplomacy here.

      And then he steps on Jabba's tail. This we might not have noticed, it could have been fudged away, but Lucas has Jabba clearly react to it. Han's already in considerable trouble, and he's just flagrantly disrespected the biggest syndicate boss on the outer rim in front of his henchmen. Han is dead. Very, very dead. Eventually dead, after an extremely nasty interlude involving hot sharp things. His head's going up on a spike in front of Jabba's palace, and the rest of him's getting fed to the banthas.

      That scene made Star Wars just... silly. Absurd. From there on, it's downhill all the way to Jar Jar Binks.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  18. Re:You know the state of film is lame when... by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I'd like to see done, and done right, is The Lensman Series, by E.E. "Doc" Smith. Yes, you'd pretty much have to re-write all the dialogue because Smith's writing style wasn't that good, but the story itself is a real classic. Most people reading it today find it cliched, but that's because Smith created the cliches and everybody's been copying him since then. I've heard that Lucas originally wanted to do this, but Smith's daughter turned him down. If so, there's a lot in the Jedi that looks like it was lifted out whole cloth.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  19. Getting Movies Made by podperson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wishing for novels or computer games to be made into movies, or better movies, is to be ridiculously naive about the moviemaking process. The problem with, say, the DOOM movie is that it's a dumb concept so it doesn't attract good people. Good people are a necessary, but not sufficient, precondition for a halfway decent movie. You options are to pay lots of money to find someone obviously good (e.g. Ridley Scott) and try to get them interested in your movie, or try to pick someone you think will be good, and hope...

    Why has StarCraft not been made into a movie? It's not so incredibly well-known that someone with $50,000,000 can be reasonably sure that folks will watch it despite it having a no-name director and no-name actors, and it isn't that interesting a concept. Aliens, only bigger. People in power armor. More aliens. Big deal. Any fool can come up with this concept, and many have.

    And even if you have a great concept, there are other obstacles.

    Why has Snowcrash not been made into a movie? Not because of any conspiracy, but because it's in creative purgatory somewhere. I guarantee you that (a) someone owns the movie rights, (b) that person has been trying to put the project together since the book was written (or he/she got the rights from the last person), and (c) the project has looked like it might happen at least ten times. The same thing happens to pretty much every halfway decent novel. "Forever War" -- for example -- has been optioned since it was published, and has had directors such as Ridley Scott interested in it, but there are only so many projects a top guy (like Paul Verhoeven, for example) can take on, and stuff gets left by the wayside. Meanwhile, do you want your brilliant SF movie directed by Ridley Scott in ten years or whoever's available today? Down one path lies a movie that never gets made; down the other lies DOOM: The Movie.

    Look at the books that do get made into movies... They're either something that has grabbed the attention of someone with serious clout (e.g. Clint Eastwood or Oprah or whoever) or they're absolute no-brainers ("The Da Vinci Code").

    Aside:

    Hitchhiker's Guide was originally a radio play, so statements (from TFA) such as "since most of the comedy was in the narrative language and descriptions" are baloney. This reminds me of the director of "The Saint" (the version with Val Kilmer) who referred to having researched "the original TV series" (sorry, bud, it was originally a series of books).

  20. Jodorowsky's Dune??? by rleibman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where the hell did this guy leave This Movie? Dali, Jodorowsky, Pink Floyd, Tangerine Dream, Giger (pre-alien), Orson Wells.
    This is the greatest S/F film never made.

  21. Ellison's "I, Robot" by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, they made a movie called I Robot. It wasn't Asimov's story, and it wasn't Ellison's magnificent screenplay--it was typical hollywood dreck eye-candy, and it was a total waste of time, money, and resources.

    Someone show me an intelligent, dramatic movie of I, Robot or in fact ANY SF story, and I'll be happy.

    (Note: "Intelligent" does not mean bullshit pseudoscience, and "dramatic" does not mean blowing shit up)

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  22. Needed: The Mega Phantom Edit. by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The way I figure it, Episode I was a total waste of time. It was dull, badly written, poorly acted and just generally no damned good. What Liam Neeson was doing in this movie I'll never understand, and the introduction of idiocies like midichlorians and Anakin-as-Jesus-virgin-birth crap was nonsensical, and would require the most bizarre explanation for Anakin's brother Owen in the next film.

    Agreed. Episode I raped my childhood. I've already gone off about midichlorians. The idea of Anakin being a created being caused by Sith force-manipulation of one of Shmi Skywalker's ova is interesting, but was introduced clumsily in Episode I. This revelation might have been something for a later episode. Or maybe an aside in a single prequel movie.

    I always come back to it, again and again: Episodes I, II and III would have made a bitchen single movie.

    Another thing that rankled about Episode I was the blatant pandering to the juvenile audience. Jar Jar Binks was only the tip of the iceberg. Young Anakin as a boy genius was just intolerable and gag-producing. Episode I didn't have to be kidvid. "The Phantom Edit" proved that.

    Episode II just didn't seem to know where to go. Did it want to be Obiwan's detective story? Did it want to be the love affair between Anakin and Padme? About Anakin's descent into the dark side? The Sith's bizarre machinations (including a Sith apprentice who tells Anakin that "oh yeah, the Sith control the Senate")? Or is it a political thriller? It wanted to go so many places in two hours that it ultimately went very little distance at all. One way to have patched things up would have been for Anakin to become Darth Vader at the end of that film, which would have made the next film much more interesting.

    Again, if the prequels had just been one movie, a lot of this weirdness could have been just asides and flashbacks. Also the main weakness of the film was the actor chosen to play Anakin as an adult. Sorry, but Hayden Christiansen falls completely flat as a pancake. He reminds me of the deer-caught-in-the-headlights performance of John Travolta as "The Boy In The Plastic Bubble." He might have been good elsewhere, but he was a bad Anakin.

    Everyone screamed when Leonardo DiCaprio was considered as Anakin. However, he had chops as an actor before "Titanic," (Go rent "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" and "The Basketball Diaries" sometime) and he definitely showed he had chops and could portray a character like Anakin in the movie "The Aviator." DiCaprio's Howard Hughes was a swashbuckling, rogueish guy who started coming apart at the seams. Anakin Skywalker always struck me as a swashbuckling roguish guy who came apart at the seams. DiCaprio is going to wind up like fellow ex-teen idol Johnny Depp...a really awesome character actor who can do anything he wants to. I don't know if his oevre will be as quirky as Johnny Depp, whose work I love.

    Episode III. As close as we'll ever get in Lucas's post-1980s world to a good Star Wars film. Still clunky, but at least the Emperor comes off interesting (by now he's clearly the only character in the prequels that is really all that interesting). Still, way too much deux ex machina. Anakin still seems to sort of abruptly become Darth Vader rather than a slow descent into evil (which is why I think the more natural transition would have been at the end of Episode II). The whole "my apprentice is in trouble" which gets the Emperor on a ship to fly to Vader's aid was the worst example. The ending was idiotic, the Darth Vader suit sequence seeming anticlimactic, and the whole bit about Padme dying not only ridiculously maudlin but making the Epside VI statement by Leia that she could still remember her mother rather odd, considering Luke didn't.

    Episode III would provide the backbone to a potential "Mega Phantom Edit." Every important element that moved the plot forward in Episodes I and II could be told in flashback around the framework of Episode III.

    The whole relationship between Padme and A

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  23. Re:Matrix sequels sucked. WHOAH..... by Xytheril · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't know about you, but I might like to see a movie where Jesus fights thousands of cloned Kung Fu Romans. He kicks all of their asses, and then at the end, when he thinks he's won, the last one sneaks up behind him, grabs him, and they nail him up. Or at least that should've been how Passion of the Christ ended.

  24. Episode II could have been easily better... by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ... If Count Dooku had not been consciously Sith-influenced, but rather an honest "loyal opposition."

    This would have required only minimal changes to the sequencing of things, and could have shown off off the fall of the Old Republic as an honest-to-goodness tragedy. Having the Sith successfully playing off two honestly well-intentioned sides against each other could have worked out excellently well.

    What was also unfortunate is that little more than lip-service was paid to the various "failures of democracy." It seemed to me that when Dooku explained, in Kenobi's earshot, why he was collecting up forces to oppose what was going on in the parliament, he had some pretty legitimate reasons for concern.

    Unfortunately, all we saw, after the various "things failing," was that people seized at power of one sort or another to respond to them. What perhaps wasn't clear enough was that seizure of power was, in every case, a mistake.

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  25. MOD UP by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So many other folks don't seem to get how the Jedi Order in the prequels was intentionally a bit crap. The "return" in ROTJ means Luke is restarting the Jedi, but it also means that the purity has returned, the Jedi are back to their ideal.

    Note how neither Yoda nor Obi-Wan try to teach Jedi culture to Luke. No "council", no rules, no "padawan" or other ranks. If they hadn't the time while alive, they could still do it while blue and glowy - but no. I'd call that deliberate.

  26. The Matrix Re-Edited by payndz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm pretty sure if you give me Reloaded and Revolutions and a knife, I can cut you a lone, 100-minute Matrix sequel that would flatten your balls.

    I actually did that, just for the hell of it. It wasn't 100 minutes, but 117 isn't too far off. As to whether it flattened anyone's balls, I couldn't really say - but I do know it's now the only way I can watch the sequels, because it made me realise just how awfully bloated and padded and pretentious they are.

    The major changes:
    All the 'Trinity's death' dream sequence (and references to it) removed.
    Film now starts with Smith possessing Bane, then cuts to Neo jolting awake on the Neb as if that's what woke him.
    Meeting of the captains shortened.
    Arrival at Zion shortened.
    The Kid excised almost completely (I accidentally left one shot of him in).
    The rave deleted.
    Neo's fight with Seraph removed.
    The Oracle's conversation with Neo shortened.
    Most of the meeting with the Merovingian taken out (including the 'virtual orgasm').
    Chateau fight shortened.
    Twins fight shortened.
    Car chase shortened.
    Fight between Morpheus and the Agent deleted.
    The scene where the Machines destroy one of the ships re-edited to take out the 'WTF?' accident that kills the crew (now they just get blown up).
    The Architect's bafflegab shortened.
    Trinity/Agent fight shortened.
    Trinity doesn't get shot while falling - Neo simply grabs her, so the scene of him taking out the bullet also goes.
    The 'DUN!' ending of Reloaded re-edited using a shot from Revolutions so that the two films blend together.
    The entire Mobil Avenue/Club Hel/Morpheus and Trinity meet the Oracle section deleted.
    Neo's meeting with the Oracle shortened.
    Smith's meeting with the Oracle, ditto.
    The standoff between Neo and Bane as Trinity's held hostage removed.
    The three stories at the climax are now intercut - Neo's flight to Machine City, the Hammer's Sewer Shark fight and the Battle of Zion now all take place at once.
    Huge amount of cutting of the Battle of Zion - the only minor character who now gets any screentime is Mifune (Zee and all her pals are completely gone).
    Major re-editing so that Mifune, not The Kid, opens the door.
    Trinity's death scene cut by three frickin' minutes!
    Super Burly Brawl shortened.
    Meeting between the Oracle and the Architect cut - the film now ends with Neo's apotheosis cutting straight to sunrise over the Matrix.

    All done using iMovie and iDVD! I know that some Matrix purists were enraged by the mere idea of cutting any of the existential dialogue when I posted about this elsewhere, but screw 'em - if you live your life according to the philosophy of a movie, you've got bigger problems than some guy doing his own edit of it.

    --
    You must think in Russian.