Slashdot Mirror


RSS, flickr and del.icio.us on a Mobile Phone

Roger Whittaker writes to tell us Engadget reports that Mobileglu is offering an interesting new service that gives users the ability to read RSS feeds, flickr, del.icio.us, and other sources of content in a mobile friendly format. Think this will lead to smarter content developers making their own sites more mobile friendly, or just a few lawsuits?

36 comments

  1. Risk of living off others' content by biocute · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think this will lead to smarter content developers making their own sites more mobile friendly, or just a few lawsuits?

    Most likely these content providers will sit and see what comes out of this.

    If it isn't popular, MobileGLU will die out itself; If it's popular, these content providers will invite MobileGLU to pay up, or file an injunction to shut it down while they start providing the service themselves.

    Not many company can manage to live off someone else's content for free, the one that stands out is obviously the Beast, which is also constantly under attack by content providers.

    To be successful, MobileGLU really needs to hit the market hard and fast, that is to make sure these content providers need its service more than it needs their content.

    1. Re:Risk of living off others' content by darkworm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hello there,

      Justin from mobileGlu here. The idea behind mobileGlu is not to live off other people's content, we are just acting as a mobile aggregator for people's flickr, delicious, upcoming, RSS etc life online, and that relationship is one to many (i.e. one user many content), not many to many like public aggregators.

      The main goal behind the project is not to leech people's content, but to act as a two-way hub between the user and the web service (e.g. allowing user's to post photos from their mobile to their Flickr account, and view those photos), and to help enable other web services to get mobilised as quickly as possible.

      Hope that clear some things up?

      Justin

    2. Re:Risk of living off others' content by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Technically, any ISP works because of content provided by others at no cost to the ISP, whether that content is paid or otherwise.

    3. Re:Risk of living off others' content by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      You can't file an injuction, you need to sue and have a judge impose one. Most of the time they are temporary (and the content providers can't get anything going within the time frame covered by most temporary injuctions) - the permanent ones are only if you lose, and then the damages would likely wipe you out anyway.

      That being said, the decision made in the Nevada District Court in Las Vegas regarding the Google cache sets a hopeful precedent.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  2. Opera mobile by dotpavan · · Score: 3, Informative
    Doesnt Opera Mobile do the same?

    "Opera Mobile browser lets you surf the full Web on your mobile phone. And when we say "the full Web," we really mean the *full* Web. Equipped with Opera's Small-Screen Rendering technology, the Opera Mobile browser lets you access any site on the Internet, just like you do on your computer."

    1. Re:Opera mobile by op12 · · Score: 1

      Or even Opera Mini.

      Opera Mini(TM) is a fast and easy alternative to Opera's mobile browser, allowing users to access the Web on mobile phones that would normally be incapable of running a Web browser. This includes the vast majority of today's WAP-enabled phones.

      Instead of requiring the phone to process Web pages, it uses a remote server to pre-process the page before sending it to the phone. This makes Opera Mini(TM) perfect for phones with very low resources, or low bandwidth connections.

      Opera Mini(TM) offers the same speed and usability as the renowned Opera mobile browser, and uses Opera's Small Screen Rendering(TM) technology to provide access to the Web. It has all the features expected of a browser, and more, such as bookmarks, browsing history, and ability to split large pages into smaller sections for faster browsing.

    2. Re:Opera mobile by JulesLt · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the difference is that the Opera browser shows the whole web page (inc. the ads subsidising said page, etc) rather than accessing the underlying data.

      --
      'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
  3. MobileRSS by brokencomputer · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is kind of like Mobile RSS.

    1. Re:MobileRSS by turnstyle · · Score: 1

      You might also be interested in my app, Bitty Browser -- for example, you can also use it the other way around (ie, to embed mobile content within regular Web pages). -Scott

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    2. Re:MobileRSS by wanorris · · Score: 1

      There are a ton of RSS readers for various mobile platforms such as Pocket PC and Palm. The most useful ones also work offline, so you can read the feeds without having an open connection.

      But I can't help thinking that while the proprietary approach of taking specific websites and ripping their content might work for a brief period, in the long run it is surely doomed.

      The proper solution is websites that deploy CSS intelligently to produce pages formatted properly for small screens. That's what CSS and the whole separation of content from presentation is for: making sure the underlying content can be accessed through a variety of platforms in a manner appropriate to each one.

  4. bloglines mobile is good enough by BlackShirt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    frankly speaking, it is excellent. try to beat that.
    1. create bloglines account, subscribe to couple of feeds.
    2. swithch to mobile version
    http://bloglines.com/mobile
    3. read all your news in a friendly format (I mostly use it behind my PC as it is just so simple)
    http://bloglines.com/myblogs_subs

  5. WWW = Wirelessly Wank to Wenk by thesandbender · · Score: 0

    Ahhh... Flikr on my mobile... I wonder if Tim Berners-Lee still weeps from time to time or he has just become so jaded he doesn't care.

    /no pictures of wenk because this ain't fark.
    //hey... no slashies either!!!
    ///darnit, where'd I put my owl?

    1. Re:WWW = Wirelessly Wank to Wenk by coolCoder · · Score: 1

      Try Novarra's nWeb, its better than all others in rendering mobile content on the cell phones www.novarra.com

  6. Have u tried Novarra Inc's, mobile browser by coolCoder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Try Novarra's nWeb, its better than all others in rendering mobile content on the cell phones. http://www.novarra.com/

  7. Great by sulli · · Score: 1

    Now we will have mobile 2.0 hype.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  8. What about the cost? by xoip · · Score: 1

    We just heard M$ tell us that Cell phones were too expensive and that they were going to save us with WiFi+Voip.
    Now we have a service that will cost a fortune in many markets.
    Which is it?...too expensive or attractively priced?

  9. worked for Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not many company can manage to live off someone else's content for free

    worked for Google news/images/web and for them its a billion dollar earner
    he could argue that he is merely a search engine indexing and caching the content
    after all thats what Google does so their arguments can be his

    1. Re:worked for Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Google moved past their initial "leecher" status and became profitable doing ads. Can this? That's the survivability test.

  10. Re:worked for Google. Still leeching. by gflammer · · Score: 1

    Google has never moved past the leech stage, they dice up content sucked from anywhere they can find it. Their ads are spam. The user did not ask for them; GOOG gets paid for them. The Anti-leech http://www.customizegoogle.com/

  11. webapps and copyrights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you thought being able to easily copy and paste bits and pieces of other people's cool html presented a copyright conundrum, you ain't seen nothing yet. The about-to-explode web applications market will give copyright lawyers so much work to do that they might even forget about mp3's for a while.

    Expose some xml data, and I can get at it w/ some simple xpath/xsl/xquery voodoo, mix and match with other data, refactor into my thing, which is itself exposed, other people query it, mix it, ad infinitum. Here are some of CNN's current top story titles:

    doc("http://rss.cnn.com/rss/cnn_topstories.rss")// title/text()

    Where do I cross the line from 'fair use' to 'copyright infringement'? If I run a query that returns something like:

    <value>1</value>

    ...I think it would be hard to argue that I've violated anyone's rights, no matter how widely I disseminate this information. If however I suck down an author's entire oeuvre and spit it out for anyone else to use, then I've probably stepped on somebody toes. So where do you draw the line? I really have no idea.

    If there is a copyright notice associated with xml data, then at some point you may also very well be obligated to copy and redistribute the copyright notice along with the data. Should there be a standard way of associating xml copyrights with xml data, so that the copyright notice could be part of the standard xml query? Nothing complicated, something as simple as ... would suffice.

    If you look at cnn's rss feed page summary, you can see that they put their terms of use out-of-band on the webpage. Nothing in the xml data itself gives any indication about what the copyright terms are (the copyright holder is identified).

    Of course, it would be nice if copyright authors could be really terse with such things, as it gets to be a little cumbersome to be transferring huge copyright notices along with little xml queries. Maybe copyrights should be uri's.

    Anyway, the main point is that because xml queries span the gamut from atomic data points to petabytes of data, and because the whole point of xml is to simplify the copying and transmission of data, they make an interesting case study about how to define sensible boundary conditions for copyright application.

  12. flickr mobile is also good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then there is always flickr mobile:

    http://www.flickr.com/mob

  13. /. RSS by SoulMaster · · Score: 1

    I'm using my Nokia 9300 and /. RSS right now and have been for at least a month. The simple way is to peronalize a Google Home page a add all your RSS feeds to it. Then, log in to your google account from any WEP browser and volia, google reformats your pages for you. Even forms and images come through just fine. This whole message was posted using it. -S

  14. Re:worked for Google. Still leeching. by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

    Google has never moved past the leech stage, they dice up content sucked from anywhere they can find it. Their ads are spam. The user did not ask for them; GOOG gets paid for them. The Anti-leech http://www.customizegoogle.com/

    Slashdot has never moved past the leech stage, they dice up content sucked from anywhere they can find it. Their ads are spam. The user did not ask for them; Slashdot gets paid for them. The Anti-leech http://www.customizeslashdot.com/

  15. websites on mobile...so stupid by abandonment · · Score: 1

    ok, i just signed up for the 'web access' on my new v3 razr phone through my local provider a few weeks ago.

    this so called 'internet on phones' is even more ridiculous than the concept of playing games on celphones.

    1) the web-browser is SOO slow - takes a LONG time to initialize...
    2) they make you navigate through 3 or 4 screens before you can even type in an 'http://' address, each of which is hideously slow and probably costing me money because it's actually navigating some website on my providers network
    3) viewing an image heavy site like flikr on a phone? you've GOT to be kidding me - let alone the fact that most celphone users are paying by the kb...

    all adds up to 'yet more hype around celphones' that basically is a waste of time and money for the consumer.

    no thanx

    1. Re:websites on mobile...so stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a Sidekick. Full keyboard, the UI on the browser is very intuitive and websites load as quickly as about a 56k modem. I disable image loading from my settings to get things to load quicker and turn them back on if I actually want to see a photo or something. Oh, and it's all unlimited for an extra $20/mo.

      There's an SSH app you can buy (yes, buy only, unfortunately) and I love that I can connect to websites to make minor fixes for clients and check my e-mail with pine. Unlimited AIM and YIM too, great for killing time chatting to friends while you're waiting for your takeout order at the local Chinese restaurant.

      Can you tell I'm sold on this little device?

      Battery life sucks, but...

    2. Re:websites on mobile...so stupid by john-da-luthrun · · Score: 1

      Try Opera Mini - a java-based browser that should work on any modern mobile phone. From your mobile phone browser - once it has finally booted up and you have made it to the address input page - go to mini.opera.com.

    3. Re:websites on mobile...so stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) the web-browser is SOO slow - takes a LONG time to initialize...
      If you don't like your phone, get another one. Mine initalizes just about as fast as the one on my PC.

      2) they make you navigate through 3 or 4 screens before you can even type in an 'http://' address,
      If you don't like...

      each of which is hideously slow and probably costing me money because it's actually navigating some website on my providers network
      ...oh. Learn to use your current phone. It makes no sense to visit one website to find another, if theres no link there. Reminds me of a woman who would always go to Altavista to type in those 'http://'-addresses. Some of them didn't work, however. :-/

      3) viewing an image heavy site like flikr on a phone? you've GOT to be kidding me - let alone the fact that most celphone users are paying by the kb...
      You've got a point there. Of all the stuff you can do on the mobile, Flickr sounds like a bad idea.

      all adds up to 'yet more hype around celphones' that basically is a waste of time and money for the consumer.
      If you expect it to be like your desktop computer, then yes. If it's for when you can't use a desktop computer, it's a really nice tool for some people.

      When I'm waiting for a train, I can check on my phone if it's delayed. Or even when the next one should come if I can't remember it.
      When I'm in the car, I can check where I can get the cheapest diesel.
      When I'm in bed but can't sleep there's hours of entertainment without getting out of bed.
      Maybe I just need to look something up, but I'm all comfy in the couch with my laptop several meters away, then the phone is quite handy.

      Maybe there's no point for you to use it, but I'm so tired of people saying that the entire idea is stupid. It's not. A hammer is a very usable tool itself, even if YOU don't have any nails.

    4. Re:websites on mobile...so stupid by abandonment · · Score: 1

      >> Learn to use your current phone. It makes no sense to visit one website to find another, if theres no link there.

      thanx, but i DO know how to use my phone. it's not rocket science.

      There are no options to set a home page, no options to customize the startup behavior.

      I go to the 'web browser' on my phone, it doesn't give me any options but their default list of urls that I can choose - it doesn't give me an 'http://' prompt, it immediately thinks that I want one of their default pages...

      Yes this is the providers page - they don't say that it is, but it's quite obviously their 'default start page'.

      It says 'rogers 'navigate' on the page and the links are all obviously html links (wap versions)

      my options are:

      - hot picks (for what?)
      - get music & tones
      - get games
      - get graphics
      - get email / chat
      - get tv / video (yeah right)
      - my subscriptions
      - get info
      - search
      - graphical view (as if the text version wasn't slow enough)

      i have to click 'search', which takes me (eventually) to another page that gives me a search box, or i tab down to the next link which has

      - go to http:///
      - go to https:///
      - Yellow Pages
      - canada411.com
      - takeataxi.com
      - city info
      - ibm (why would i want to go to IBM's site?)
      - time zone
      - mygasprices
      - dictionary.com

      so in order for me to get an 'http://' prompt, i have to:

      - launch browser - takes approx 15 seconds to get to the first page
      - navigate the crap-ass menus - navigation on the phone is SOO laggy it's ridiculous. each link you click takes about 10 seconds to load.

      so after I spend approx 2 minutes of link navigation, i finally have an http:/// prompt to actually type in the website.

      Note that I'm getting billed for EVERY one of these pages that I have to navigate through prior to actually get said http:/// prompt, which is something that they do NOT mention to you when you sign up - you think you're actually only paying for the 'real' internet pages that you visit, but NOOOO.

      celphone providers need to realize that their crap-ass service is hindering more than helping the adoption of these devices as the 'end all be all' that they think they are.

      With that said, I'm actually going to try out this opera mobile that some people have mentioned - i've heard good things about it, perhaps it will actually let me set how I want to surf the net instead of being told how I am by my provider.

  16. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good day, sir:

    I'm from the RSS Weed 'n Feed, and I'm here to congratulate you on your COMPLETE FAILURE.

    Have a remarkable day.

    --RSS Weed 'n Feed

  17. News? by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    AvantGo has been doing this for many years! I remember using it when I bought my Palm V at JavaOne in 1998. It'll take any web page and let you read it on your PDA (or smart phone).

  18. -1 stupid by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Flickr already has a mobile phone interface, what's the point of building another?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak