Slashdot Mirror


The Family That Games Together Online

GamerDad has a piece talking about families gaming together online. The article profiles some gamer families. Brian Reynolds, CEO of Big Huge Games, is cited as an example; He games together with his sons. The article also touches on the more serious issues of addiction and quality time. From the article: "Another hidden benefit to online games is that families spread over several states can keep in touch and play online together. Thompson agrees, 'I never foresaw how important the games online would become, but I did actually get a line added into my divorce decree that guaranteed me three days a week that I could get on the computer with my kids, via web cam. So I could communicate and see them. At the time, I wasn't a huge MMORPG player, so I didn't envision the role it would play.'"

84 comments

  1. "Cmon dad, let's mug that NPC!" by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahh quality family time. ;)

  2. Me and my Father... by Quaoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    We used to WoW together: Him a 60 priest, me a 60 warrior. Then that rat bastard rolled on my Brainhacker, and I squelched his ass!

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:Me and my Father... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      well, both my son and I have shared Diablo II accounts online, so it's all good.

      Makes it a lot quicker keeping your characters up to date.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Me and my Father... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I love playing on a PvP server with my little brother. It gives me a chance to beat him up virtually, just like in real life.

      YOU HEAR THAT, BRIAN, YOU LITTLE PANSY???

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad that mmorpg gaming counts as "quality time" with their family for some people.

    1. Re:Sad by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I agree, families should LIVE together. Oh, wait this is the U.S.... nevermind. :(

    2. Re:Sad by 7macaw · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean, as in "Xbox LIVE"?

    3. Re:Sad by Hoknor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I spend time with my family doing activities such as watching things like Stargate or watching different movies or playing trivial pursuit or recently watching Olympics. It can be very quality time, because the quality of the time is not just about the activity you are sharing, but the way you share it. Watching an episode of Stargate that stimulates a discussion about a certain topic causes us to interact in a way we would not have interacted without the show. The same goes for trivial pursuit, it can stimulate a conversation about oh remember when such and such.

          If anybody else in my family actually had an active interest in gaming, then playing a game we enjoyed in common would easily represent quality time with them. I certainly feel fragging nubs with my friends outside the family has been quality time. I have certainly enjoyed dominating a server with an ex-girlfriend before, it presented an opportunity for bonding over a shared interest and promoted thinking as a unit.

    4. Re:Sad by daveo0331 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's even more sad that watching TV counts as "quality time" for some people. At least in an MMORPG you're actually interacting with the other person, talking to them, and doing something together. Yes, it would probably be better to go outside and play catch or something, but that might not be practical if you're in another state (or it's raining out, etc). Then again, playing chess counts as quality time, right? Would playing chess on a computer be better/worse than playing chess with a real chess set? Anyway it's a lot more interactive that everyone just sitting in the same room staring at the TV.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    5. Re:Sad by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Why?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    6. Re:Sad by roguenine19 · · Score: 1

      If everyone's just staring at the TV, then it's probably not too worthwhile, but if it inspires some interesting discussion (and with my family, anything can provoke that), then it's going to be worth more than spending an hour in complete silence playing chess. Both can be used productively or unproductively. It all depends on how you use it.

    7. Re:Sad by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's sad that mmorpg gaming counts as "quality time" with their family for some people.

      I play World of Warcraft with my brother, who lives 850 miles away. It's either that or talking on the phone. At least in the game we can not only chat, but "do" something together. My wife also plays. While we don't count that as quality time together, it is just one more activity that we do together to have fun. Hell, our son even joins in sometimes. Just about all he can do is mash the keyboard to make our guys do random stuff like run around in circles and jump, but he loves it.

      The key is that this is just one thing we do together. We play, we have fun, and we do other stuff, too.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  4. divorces by Elminst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but I did actually get a line added into my divorce decree that guaranteed me three days a week that I could get on the computer with my kids, via web cam.
    I think we're going to be seeing a lot more of this in divorce papers. Especially if the parent with the kids moves across the country, such that personal visits are not practical.
    On a related note, restraining orders are probably going to start having sections on internet contact, if they don't already. "I never came within 1000 yards of her, officer." "but you harassed her 4 hrs a day on AIM, off to jail"

    --
    No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    1. Re:divorces by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Ah, but whereas you might not be able to easily escape someone's physical grasp (depends who you are and how much martial arts training you've had, among other things, of course! :)) it's alot easier to log off AIM or even change your screenname... and then you can sever most ties with your real life if you haven't already (ie take real name off profile) to make it difficult for someone to pin down your new name.

      Still... I agree, eventually it'll become a problem. Of course the real problem is the acceptability of divorce... if it was looked down on more, marriage might be taken more seriously.

    2. Re:divorces by plover · · Score: 3, Funny
      The new restraining order:

      You are not permitted to come within __one_subnet___ of ____her_name____.

      --
      John
    3. Re:divorces by Jamori · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course the real problem is the acceptability of divorce... if it was looked down on more, marriage might be taken more seriously.

      There's absolutely nothing wrong with "divorce", per se. It's getting divorced once you have kids involved that is a problem.

      It could certainly be argued that a large contributing factor to the high divorce rate is the [Christian] church's insistence upon marriage before sex. This has almost undoubtedly rushed many people into marriage who just don't want to wait any longer and believe they are doing the 'right thing'.

      If people were "allowed" to take more time to come to a decision/realization about a relationship as opposed to the omg-I-can't-stand-it-anymore-lets-get-married-so-w e-can-have-sex rationale that many people succomb to, I think there would be far few marital problems, at least in the US.

      Now, before you start saying, "but that's how it was back in the good ol' days and it worked just fine!" ... no, it's not. Contrary to popular belief, sex before marriage certainly wasn't looked down 'back in the day'. In US colonial times, specifically (which I believe sufficiently qualifies as 'back in the day') it was remaining unwed after getting pregnant that was looked down upon -- if not all-but-forbidden.

      Unfortunately, I would argue, we have gotten away from that social mandate, as well. We have absolutely no social, ethical, or moral responsibility to remain married to someone when it "just isn't working out".

      However, the exact opposite is true once there are kids that depend on you.

    4. Re:divorces by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      1000 feet or 15 hops.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    5. Re:divorces by TekGoNos · · Score: 1
      restraining orders are probably going to start having sections on internet contact
      First, every restraining order already has a section against "contacting". After all, tele-harassement is an old issue and if it's done by phone or by IM is no difference.

      Second, do not solve with law what can be solved easily otherwise. Seriously. In most IM apps, you can simply block someone, so the law should not intervene. If someone doesnt block me on IM, I take this as an invitation to chat with him, restraining order or not. (I never got one though)
      However, if he blocked me and I would create new accounts, send anonymous messages, etc to get around the block, well, then the law should intervene to make me stop.
      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    6. Re:divorces by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      And how, in any way, is this relevant to the topic? I would look at society's focus on love itself, as opposed to the Church's view of it. Most people in failed marriages get married while in the throes of infatuation and lust, as opposed to really being in love. Tom Cruise, anyone?

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    7. Re:divorces by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Clearly, Tom Cruise is "most people".

  5. Games and divorce? by JonTurner · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Thompson: '...I did actually get a line added into my divorce decree that guaranteed me three days a week that I could get on the computer with my kids, via web cam. So I could communicate and see them.'
    And that's supposed to be a good thing? I think it's just sad.

    I know I'm pointing out the obvious, but perhaps he had spent more time with the family and less time gaming he wouldn't be divorcing and could be more than a face on the webcam or a guild member.

    Yeah, so I'm judgemental. At least you'll get over it. His kids probably won't.
    1. Re:Games and divorce? by 77Punker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't take issue with your passing judgment; it's a critical thing to do in order to make decisions every day. However, your judgment was passed too quickly. I bring to this conversation real-world evidence, even if it is only one case. Man and woman are married, have daughter. Later, woman cheats on man. Man finds out. Woman continues to cheat. Weak-spined man continues to forgive, expecting something to change as he goes on and continues to be a good father. Woman divorces man and marries her latest boyfriend. Court grants custody of daughter and almost all possessions to woman. Man is stuck paying $20k/yr child support in addition to college for the next 12 years. There are more details that were not mentioned, but suffice to say every detail points to this: this woman is a bitch and this man is a good person. The man was treated wrongly by the court.

      So one thing to take from this story is that sometimes good husbands and fathers are given a raw deal only because their wives are terrible people and they made a bad judgment to marry.

    2. Re:Games and divorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe his wife was the one who cheated on him? He would probably not get custody of his kids anyway. This is especially true if his wife pre-emptively filed for divorce.

      Besides he says he wasn't a big online gamer until after the divorce.

    3. Re:Games and divorce? by RingDev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I realise reading TFA is a quite an ordeal for todays ridlin fed ADD youth, but it even says in the SUMMARY, "At the time, I wasn't a huge MMORPG player, so I didn't envision the role it would play."

      He didn't start gaming until AFTER the divorce. Most likely either he, or his wife moved and the wife maintained custody. He could have been the best father ever, and the divorce could have been amicable, but if he or his x-wife moved across the country you can't honestly expect him to commute 2500 miles for 4 hours 3 nights a week. Sitting in front of a web cam for 4 hours a night talking to your father could get rather boring for a child. Why not spend an hour talking about life, then playing a game together? Seems like a perfectly good way to hang out with a child from across the country.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    4. Re:Games and divorce? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's always the man's fault.

    5. Re:Games and divorce? by Mazda6s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps the gaming had nothing to do with the divorce. People do get divorced for lots of other reasons. Some people just don't belong together and realize it too late.

      He did mention that this was before the MMOGs hit so big.

      You do have to admit that his seeing his kids via webcam is better than not seeing them at all. At least he's still involved.

    6. Re:Games and divorce? by Zarquil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm divorced.

      I don't get to see my kids every single day. Technically, I'm supposed to be able to talk to my kids every single day on the phone. In actuality, I get to talk to the answering machine 4 times out of every five that I call.

      My kids are a little too young to play online with me. But in only a year or two, my daughter will be ready to play games. She knows my MMORPG of choice. I'll happily pay her membership. It will be just one more option that we can use to communicate.

      It's one more tool at my disposal. Judge all you want. *My* kids know I'm trying.

          - Zarquil

    7. Re:Games and divorce? by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The whole concept of marriage is outdated and unsuitable for modern life. We don't live on farms anymore. Our children are not free labor to harvest our crops anymore. As much as I hate to admit it, children are a public good. They should be supported by taxes.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:Games and divorce? by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that he got divorced because he played games, when in reality, it was probably for completely different reasons. My parents split up, and although my dad does play the occasional game, he was usually the one trying to keep my brother and I from wasting our time on the computer. I think he was actually better at enforcing the rules than my mother, who didn't game at all. They broke up because they just didn't get on as well as they used to -- perhaps because they were spending too MUCH time together as a family rather than too little.

      In any case, I think that if I ever marry, I'm going to keep gaming as hardcore as I possibly can. I doubt it will negatively affect my life either, given that the chances of me marrying a non-gamer are slim to nil. A fellow gamer is much less likely to have a problem with me refusing an expensive romantic evening in favor of a guild MC run :)

      Oh, and P.S., many kids are quite happy to see their parents divorce, particularly if they're mature/smart enough to realize that happy separate parents are much better than angry fighting married parents. It just irks me when people pity me just because my parents live apart, as if that's something that I need to "get over", as if it bothered me in the first place.

    9. Re:Games and divorce? by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      Children are not the property of the public. When government money is used to pay for them, government power will be thrust into the realm of raising them. It already happens to plenty of kids in awful situations where their parents are unfit or unwilling to take care of them. I plan on getting married one day because I desire the security offered by a (properly selected) lifetime companion. I'll probably also have children with said companion. I won't want public money for or public intrusion into the raising of my kids. I will deal with them how I want to deal with them and I don't want Bill the socialist or Linda the whore or Ted the pedophile to have any say in it.

    10. Re:Games and divorce? by symbolic · · Score: 1

      They should be supported by taxes.

      God I hope you're kidding.

    11. Re:Games and divorce? by swansontec · · Score: 1

      Say good bye to Democracy, then. Once you let the goverment raise the children, how do you expect them to think and vote independently? In one generation, you'll lose all true freedom and independence.

    12. Re:Games and divorce? by Jacius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As much as I hate to admit it, children are a public good. They should be supported by taxes.

      (I really shouldn't feed the trolls, but this one is a little too good to pass up.)

      Your plan is really quite fascinating, but it has a couple little kinks that will have to be worked out before you put it before Congress/Parliament/etc.:

      1. It is inherently unfair. Suppose Citizen A is a single, employed man. Citizen B is an unemployed, "deadbeat dad" with 6 children. Why should Citizen A be forced to pay a monetary fine because Citizen B doesn't want to wear a condom during sex with his wife/girlfriend/partner/whore? Why should the conseqences of Citizen B's actions be paid for by everyone else? Should we also start paying for each others' car insurance, so that Citizen B isn't inconvenienced when he causes $20,000 in property damage when he tries to drive himself home after a night of drinking?

      2. It is inherently unwise. Would you actually want your children to be raised or even paid-for by the government? Aside from such Brave New World-esque concerns as brainwashing ("Don't worry Senator, in 6 years when you run for President, you'll have enough 'supporters' to carry you through in 7 key states; I'll see to that! *evil laughter, thunder sounds*"), there is the more practical concern of money—in particular, the taking of money and flushing it down the toilet via a monolithic bureaucracy which spends 30-40% of the taxes maintaining itself, instead of supporting the children.

      3. It is based on false assumptions. You say that children are a "public good". Is my life enriched because the couple next-door had a couple brats who scream and shout at all hours when I'm trying to sleep? Is your child's life enriched when she has to be crammed into a classroom with 40 other kids because there aren't enough teachers to handle them all? Children are not a public good, nor are they a public responsibility. Both the benefit and the responsibility of raising children are private, belonging only to those individuals who know and care for the children (parents, relatives, etc.).

      Don't worry, though; I'm sure if you fix these small problems in your plan, it will be workable.

      Err.. hrmm.. well, no, it looks like your plan would be quite non-existent then. Sorry if I let the air out of your balloon.

    13. Re:Games and divorce? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      And the rest of society will end up paying for your half-assed parenting.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    14. Re:Games and divorce? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait, wait. Are you honestly saying that NOT pawning off your parenting responsibilities on every other asshole in the US is "half-assed parenting?"

      I dunno about grandparent, but if you're USian, I now completely agree with him.

    15. Re:Games and divorce? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Uhuh, so you're suggesting that you receive no benefit from there being a fresh batch of teenagers entering the workforce every year. We all enjoy the benefits of scientific discoveries and, as any mathematician will tell you, its a game for the young. Maybe someday we'll reverse the aging process and the effect children have on society will become negative, but until then we can either continue our hand-off, see no evil, hear no evil approach to introducing children to society or we can encourage parents to utilize the services of a professional child carer - and no, I'm not talking about a school teacher!

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    16. Re:Games and divorce? by mikael · · Score: 1

      I know I'm pointing out the obvious, but perhaps he had spent more time with the family and less time gaming he wouldn't be divorcing and could be more than a face on the webcam or a guild member.

      Some fathers have no choice but to work away from home for long periods of time. I know oil workers who had to work two weeks onshore and two weeks offshore. Others work in the merchant navy and have to spend months away from home. Then there are long distance truck drivers, contractors, the armed forces, airline pilots, medical staff who work odd shifts, and even some researchers have to work in remote field stations for weeks on end. Even university professors seem to have spend large amounts of time travelling to the other end of the country just to get industrial approval for the funding of their research projects as well as attend conferences.
      All to just be able to pay the mortgage and property tax on a house, save for a retirement pension, save for college fees, pay the bills, let alone feeding and clothing their wife and kids.

      In my school, many kids (including myself) had parents divorced due to these reasons. I was fortunate enough to have parents living about one block away from each other, but shuttling between two houses depending upon which parent was home from work was a real hassle.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    17. Re:Games and divorce? by Jacius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhuh, so you're suggesting that you receive no benefit from there being a fresh batch of teenagers entering the workforce every year.

      If I had suggested such a thing, it would have been a foolish and unprovable claim. It would also be foolish to suggest, as you are doing, that teenagers are entering the workforce to provide some intangible benefit to "society". They are already being compensated for the benefit that they provide.

      If the parents do a good job, they too are rewarded for their years of labor spent raising a child: both from the satisfaction of a "job well done" continuing the species and their own genes, and from emotional and material support in their old age.

      Point out the person who is providing a service to me, but whom is not being paid for that service, and I will pay him in proportion to the services rendered. But don't expect me to give my money to nameless strangers so they can collect a second paycheck, nor to pay for services provided to people I have never even met.

      We all enjoy the benefits of scientific discoveries and, as any mathematician will tell you, its a game for the young.

      At what point did I suggest that humanity should stop breeding? Humanity has had quite a lot of success makin' babies without everyone else paying for the diapers afterwards; I see no reason why people would suddenly change their mating habits in response to the government abstaining (no pun intended) from trying to re-shape society.

      We all enjoy the benefits of discoveries, yes, but we also compensate the discoverer—or, at least, such would be the case with a functional patent system. Right now, there are quite a few people making fortunes from other people's work (something which closely resembles what you are proposing, in fact). But that's another issue entirely.

      Maybe someday we'll reverse the aging process and the effect children have on society will become negative, but until then we can either continue our hand-off, see no evil, hear no evil approach to introducing children to society or we can encourage parents to utilize the services of a professional child carer - and no, I'm not talking about a school teacher!

      I'm not sure where you got the idea that all parents are perpetuating some great crime against each generation of infants, but I can assure you that there exist some parents who actually do a decent job of raising kids on their own.

      Of course, there are bad parents, too—people who, in fairness, shouldn't have tried to raise children. But I take issue with your idea of taxing everyone, including the good parents, to pay for the mistakes of a few. You talk about the current system as a "see no evil, hear no evil" approach—what, then, do you call it when the government steps in and says, "You've done something bad, and that was unfortunate. But we'll take care of it. Don't you worry your little head. There's no need for you to change."

      I'd also like to make clear that there is a major difference between encouraging certain parents to use child care and mandating that all parents use child care. One is optional, a mere suggestion of possible benefit. The other is an order, backed by threat of imprisonment and other forms of physical force. (I am not saying that the government will send the army to your door if you don't pay taxes one year; but a tax is a law, and a law is ultimately supported by the government's ability to enforce it through physical force.)

    18. Re:Games and divorce? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Of course, society couldn't have crawled out of the dark ages without groups of people forcibly taking the fruits of one person's labor to give to another person, all the while claiming "it's for your own good."

      Oh wait, society climbed out of the dark ages DESPITE people doing that.

      Yes, much technology has been developed with government money. Mostly, it was developed to more efficiently coerce or kill people. The non-military benefits were mostly afterthoughts.

      The government does so many other things right, why not give them the job of raising children too? After all, the United States public education system is the gem of the world!

      Yay kids, you too could grow up to be as smart and classy as Dubya!

    19. Re:Games and divorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like we haven't already? Have you watched the news lately?

    20. Re:Games and divorce? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Man grows balls, hires an investigator and takes the bitch to the bank for all she's got. Then spends a portion of his out-of-court settlement on thugs to squelch said bitch for good.

      Or moves to the tropics and gets freaky deaky with the locals :)

      Either way, life's problems have solutions, but the biggest problem of them all is apathy.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    21. Re:Games and divorce? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

      I agree, this guys actually plays with his kids instead of watching TV like a good god-fearing, flag-waving American. No wonder his righteous wife has demanded divorce from such a deviant. Do you realize the damage done on his children? Instead of receiving their Government-approved weekly dose of Jack Bauer's Canned Moral Values (TM), they are forced to interact with their father on one of those video games.

      Remember, party-approved ocupations are limited to watching TV, attending church and hunting quails. No other behavior is compatible with being a good parent.

      Come to think of it, this divorce is actually a good thing. Now his children will be protected from the corrupting influence of their father. It might take them some time to realize it, but it's for their own good. Their father has exposed them to those addictive video games; he's akin to a drug-dealer if not Satan-worshipper or even Terrorist.

      Yeah, so I'm judgemental. At least you'll get over it. His kids probably won't.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    22. Re:Games and divorce? by animaal · · Score: 1
      Should we also start paying for each others' car insurance, so that Citizen B isn't inconvenienced when he causes $20,000 in property damage when he tries to drive himself home after a night of drinking?


      Well, that's the way insurance works. You pay $X per year, even though you have no accidents. All the $X add up to pay for Mr. Jones, who forgot to check in his mirror, and ended causing $100,000 of damage in a pile-up. The principle is that some day *you* may be that Mr. Jones. Same with having kids. Whatever your situation now, you may have kids some day. And their well being and health should depend *totally* on your attitude towards investment and your career.

      Both the benefit and the responsibility of raising children are private, belonging only to those individuals who know and care for the children (parents, relatives, etc.).


      When you retire, who will be paying for the upkeep of the infrastructure you'll be using? The roads, public services, emergency services? When you're drawing down your pension, whose contributions will be topping up the pension fund you've invested in? It'd be nice to think that your own contributions will be put aside by the fund managers until you retire. Unfortunately, that's not how it usually works. Your current contributions are probably paying for the pension incomes of current pensioners. And when you retire, it'll be the same for you. Of course, that's a general situation; you may be managing your own retirement funds, or planning on working until you drop. But society tends to form its rules around the average situation.

    23. Re:Games and divorce? by animaal · · Score: 1

      Oops, typo.

      Whatever your situation now, you may have kids some day. And their well being and health shouldn't depend totally on your attitude towards investment and your career.

    24. Re:Games and divorce? by montyzooooma · · Score: 1
      Brian Reynolds, CEO of Big Huge Games...

      Says he didn't MMO much. Doesn't say he didn't game. Though I agree there may have been an element of neglect but it was probably more to do with being a CEO than with being a gamer.

    25. Re:Games and divorce? by cluke · · Score: 1

      Well, you might not like it when people take your precious money away from you, but we do live in a society and it's not in our interest to have hordes of feral children running about. It's only fair to the child that if their parents are good for nothing that the government will step in and lend a hand to ensure that the children get as good a start as possible, under the circumstances.

      Either that, or forcibly sterilise people deemed to be unfit parents, but I don't think we want to be going down that route!

    26. Re:Games and divorce? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      re-read that summary: "Brian Reynolds, CEO of Big Huge Games, is cited as an example..."

      then later: "Thompson agrees, 'I never foresaw how important the games online would become... I wasn't a huge MMORPG player..."

      The quote in questions is from Thompson, the divorce', not Reynolds.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    27. Re:Games and divorce? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Your post has pain and suffering written all over it. I truly am sorry for whatever your parents may have done to you, or what happened to you out of their control. Whether you accept my prayers or not, they are there.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    28. Re:Games and divorce? by millennial · · Score: 1

      Preach it, brother. If I had mod points, you'd be getting a +1, Insightful on all your posts in this thread right now.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    29. Re:Games and divorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of our situations are out of our control. I have a similar situation.

      My contract job ended in the south while my permanent residence was up north. She moved up north to be near her family where our permanent residence and divorce occurred. I tried for well over a year to get a new job in that area. That market lacked my skills so I had to move back south to even pay my child support, let alone rent. She got pregnant with some other guy even during our divorce process...

      In the end both parties are at fault to some degree or another...I wasn't perfect...and she definitely wasn't either. Divorce is never pretty, but sometimes it is the best choice for all. A household with fighting parents can be much worse than a divided house.

    30. Re:Games and divorce? by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      It's called group marriage. It works.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    31. Re:Games and divorce? by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it works. Works pretty well for all of the pedophiliac polygamists in Utah, huh? You probably don't need to be told this, but Mormons are a bad example to follow on marriage and...well...everything.

  6. Obligatory World of Warcraft forums quote by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

            Brion, Tuesday aug 16th, 2005 @ 3:29 AM
            ok i have a proposition for the horde, let us kill Korrak while you sit and watch. and well let you get all the honor youll ever want=}. no? ok well it shall be a great battle then, hope to see everyone there!

            Fayda, Tuesday aug 16th, 2005 @ 8:44 AM
            ((OOC))

            Pardon me for hijacking the thread, here..

            But, Brion - if you don't want your mother to know you were up and on the computer at 3:29 in the morning - DON'T post on a forum that she reads.

            Busted.
            Grounded.
  7. My experiences by robyannetta · · Score: 4, Funny
    I've played WoW for a year and recently got my nephew online.

    Until he signed up for WoW, we rarely ever spoke, even though we both miss each other very much.

    Now that I've added him to my guild, he won't leave me the hell alone. I've learned to hate my family now, they're all ninka looters. FuXin n00b.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  8. Gaming with family by Tojosan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My son and I have played been playing online games together since EQ1 came out.
    He is now 16 and we are playing EQ2 together. There have been a couple of other MMORPGs in between.

    Before that though, we gamed on consoles and I introduced him to PC games at an early age.

    Gaming together, and play in general, is something all parents should do with their children. My son and I are much closer than we might have been, and definitely gotten some deeper insight into each other.

    Playing an RPG like EQ or WoW, gives a young person a chance to exercise their personal skills in a variety of settings, being their with him/her gives a parent a chance to mentor, observce and assist.

    As for the insight part, my son and I play totally differently in some areas. Grouping up, we learn how the other thinks about things, like fair play, how to treat others, and prioritizing.

    That sad, game play is no substitute for good parenting. So, if you're excuse for not spending any other time with yoiur family is that you play EQ together....well, you read the article. :)

    Laters,
    Tojosan

  9. I'm hesitant. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know about you all, but there were moments during many an NES battle between my sisters and I that ended with a chunky controller being flung toward a skull. If you threw MMO drama into the mix, a family like mine may well end up pressing charges.

    Those NES pads had some corners, I tellya what..

    1. Re:I'm hesitant. by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      That's why they went ergonomic. Rounded the edges off so they wouldn't cause so much bleeding. Problem is they became more aerodynamic, so more blunt-forced head trauma was the result. Don't even get me started on the N64 "trident."

      Let's just hope the PS3 boomerang is given some serious thought..
      Dear God, Please won't someone think of the the children?!

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  10. Don't do this. by svip · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend (who's at uni) and I play together, along with her mum.

    Talk about awkward.

    On the plus side, her mum likes me without having met me. Boy is she in for a surprise.

    On a side note, one of my guildmates started playing together with his son. The son's moved on, the father hasn't.

    --
    This is a sig. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Don't do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      My girlfriend (who's at uni) and I play together, along with her mum. Talk about awkward

      No shit.

      On the plus side, her mum likes me without having met me.

      Eh?........ Oh, computer games, I get it.

  11. I play StarCraft with my 4 year old. by LionKimbro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Her favorite configuration is Protoss (her) & Protoss (me) vs. Zerg (computer.)

    I wrote about how she used to play the Terrans on my blog a while back.

    If I'm lost in online stuff, I hear: "C'mon daddy, it's time to play StarCraft."

    1. Re:I play StarCraft with my 4 year old. by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Damn, now I want to have a birthday party for an old beat up rusted crumbling dark building too! :)

      Great story.

    2. Re:I play StarCraft with my 4 year old. by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Oh, that explains the time I saw a cute toddler running around saying, "OMFG PWNT!!1!"

    3. Re:I play StarCraft with my 4 year old. by valintin · · Score: 1

      My son's eight and we still call StarCraft "Playing Teams" which is what he called it back when he was five. My wife and I play with him agianst one or two computer opponents.

  12. The Family That Games Together... by Triv · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Maims Together.

    1. Re:The Family That Games Together... by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      ...Maims Together.

      don't you mean MAMEs together?

    2. Re:The Family That Games Together... by dhasenan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      MAMEs together.

      Couldn't resist.

  13. Family Games by Descalzo · · Score: 1
    My brother lives in New Jersey, I live in Utah. Playing Enemy Territory helps us get together more than once every other year.

    My wife and I play Jeopardy on the computer from time to time. It is one of the few games we both really like to play.

    My friend and her husband do WoW online as a family. That's kinda wierd, but they enjoy it.

    Another buddy and his son make a big deal of playing Star Wars Galactic Battlegrounds (if he's been good) or Heroes of Might and Magic IV.

    My son is not quite 2 yet, but I plan on playing with Legos and on the computer with him. What's the real difference? Family games are family games, no?

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    1. Re:Family Games by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      Family games are family games, no?

      We like a hearty deathmatch after dinner, helps us all sleep a little better.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    2. Re:Family Games by phlinn · · Score: 1

      So... if he's not good it's Heroes IV? I never thought I'd see the day a game was used as a form of punishment. :)

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    3. Re:Family Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another buddy and his son make a big deal of playing Star Wars Galactic Battlegrounds (if he's been good) or

      ...or Star Wars Galaxies (if he's been bad).

  14. You don't travel much, do you? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Informative
    As much as I hate to admit it, children are a public good. They should be supported by taxes.

    One flight in an airplane w/a squalling infant who takes a dump 3 minutes into takeoff will have you reading Swift's Modest Proposal as a How-To guide.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  15. Cyber stalking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having been cyber-stalked in the past, I can tell you that it's not a fun experience. Sometimes you can ignore or ban people, but they can always open another account and keep harassing you. With a determined cyberstalker it's an arms race of producing new, unknown email and AIM accounts ahead of the stalker. I've had to change my email address and contact details more than once in the past and it's a pita each time because you've got to make sure that all the people on your list know the new address without it leaking out.

    Australian law has a repeated contact-harrassment clause in its stalking laws, but I've never bothered with a restraining order. It's hard to enforce that sort of thing when you can't tell where a harasser is located physically.

    -Kell

  16. Good call by LiquidEdge · · Score: 1

    I love my wife and my kids, but if I ever get a divorce, I'll take whatever time I can get with them, even if it's online game. I may only get them 30-50% of the time, but I can be with them all of their free time that they're willing to play online that way.

    --
    Saving the World: One Drink at a Time
  17. In a nutshell... by MMaestro · · Score: 1

    Modern divorces almost always end with the courts siding with the wife. Play the sexist card (women are better parents, its was the mean ol' drunken dad's fault, the woman would NEVER hurt the kids, etc) and its very hard to win modern day divorces if your the husband. Throw in the fact that 'dad' is generally the 'breadwinner', thus generally not home 9-5, and its extremely hard to make a good case for the husband to keep the kids, let alone not pay child support for several decades when you know the wife had squandered most of the savings away.

  18. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a married father with two pre-teen children. I gave a WoW subscription to one of them as a gift to go along with a new computer and within a few weeks everyone but my wife became addicted to the game. Pretty soon the three of us would take turns playing our characters, doing quests, etc and for a while WoW entirely displaced time we had previously spent together playing other games and watching television.

    Things got more interesting after a month or two when all of us made online friends and started discussing all manner of things related to the game. Since we often shared each others characters we often had to explain to our buddies which of us was playing at any given time and sharing stories of our friends exploits became a regular topic of conversation. Sending notes to each other's characters via the in-game email system also created an interesting communications channel as well.

    Unfortunately my wife (who is entirely uninterested in the game) and I have had to also deal with the negative aspects of the game which include:

    • the overall increase in the amount of time we all spend playing
    • squabbling over whose turn it is to play
    • exposure to inappropriate subjects in online chats
    • relative lack of interest in other kinds of activities

    Looking back now I think WoW has in some ways forced our family to come to terms with family issues I otherwise would not have expected to have to deal with until my kids were a few years older. This has caused some new kinds of stress for us but overall I think we're better off learning how to cope with this kind of thing than ignoring it and so I would say it has been a good experience for us so far.

  19. We do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myself, my dad and my brother have all played several online games together; the latest being WoW. Usually it's me who finds a game then they follow me to it.

  20. Obligatory SW reference by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    The whole thing about mentoring reminds me of, "Always two there are, no more, no less: a master and an apprentice." So, eh, let's hope the "graduation" doesn't go like in the Sith tradition ;)

    But seriously, it makes me wonder if one-on-one mentoring wouldn't go better in a more controlled two-player way than in an MMO. There are so many bad influences, and they're so contagious. Ranging from "let's go over the mountain and gank alliance newbies in Northshire" or "let's roll undead chars and camp the zones with newbie warlock quests" (I hope sincerely hope that's not the kind of insecurity and way to boost one's fragile ego you're trying to get your son to learn) to "r u a grl??? wanna cyber???" to... well, I know at least one middle aged manager who writes l33t in online games. Made me wonder how contagious that really is. To God knows what else.

    Basically I'm probably gonna get flamed for it, but I _am_ saying that games and the people in those games _do_ influence people. Not in the way of turning someone into a crazed serial killer because they've played GTA, of course, but people do learn from each other and learn to imitate the ones they admire. Often meaning the biggest flaming retards. So same as your son can learn to smoke just to be like Tom down the street who is sooo cool and popular, he can also learn to try to be an even bigger asshole than LordNoobKillah in the online guild. Just a thought.

    Basically if you would pay any attention to what friends your kid has IRL, or who's he hanging around with, I'd pay the same attention to the online entourage. Just because someone's character isn't "real" doesn't mean he can't give real advice or that someone can't follow it. And certain games and certain servers attract entirely too many assholes for me to be comfortable with the idea of letting a kid loose in there. At least until he's old enough and I'm positive that he's already been taught what's right and wrong and can make a sane judgment as to whose advice to follow.

    For that matter, while games are good and fine, I hope mentoring includes time together outside games. Looking at the things I've learned from my father, even if they did involve a computer -- e.g., he encouraged me to learn assembly at the age of 14, and BASIC before that -- I can't help notice that none of that would have happened if we just fired up a MMO/MUD/BBS-game/whatever and went merrily killing NPCs. What he taught me was how to _make_ a game like those, which given the limitations of a ZX-81 with 1K RAM admittedly wasn't much, but still served to hammer in some notions of logic and analytical thinking, rather than just how to play them.

    Just saying, you know... Gaming skills are good and fine, and I'll be the first to sing praises to them, but there are some other skills that ensure I'm overpaid as an EJB consultant at the moment.

    Other skills and attitudes I've got from my mom and grandma, especially mom's sorta paladin-like lawful-good philosophy that, if nothing else, kept me well out of trouble so far. I can't help thinking that it's been far more useful teaching me that, than it would have been to teach me how to keep aggro while tanking Onyxia, or how to respec to Holy and chain-cast Flash Heal as a priest in an MC raid.

    Just some random musings, you know.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  21. Says it all by tallniel · · Score: 1
    "The Family That Games Together Online ... divorce decree ..."
  22. Time? by DerCed · · Score: 1

    I would really like to have some sort of "web community" for me and my family, not a forum, not a chat, but a game.

    But the members of my family have really no time for playing a MMORPG. So could someone suggest a funny and interesting browser game which brings a group of people (family, collegues, etc.) together and requires not much time? Additionaly it should have a very easy interface in order to let the less computerized family members also enjoy it.

    In most of the games, you are alone against everyone or can just join a "guild", but it's more or less still very "lonely". Except for games like World of Dungeons (medieval browser rpg). But not everyone is interested in RPGs...
    I would imagine something like running a little company together against others.. or conquering other countries.. I don't know!

  23. We don't need computer games by kidcharles · · Score: 1

    Our family doesn't need computer games. We perform in a traveling stage show. It never fails to bring us closer together. We call ourselves "The Aristocrats."

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  24. And what evidence do you have? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I think you missed a line:

    Especially if the parent with the kids moves across the country

    In other words, it's better than nothing. There's nothing to indicate that the man didn't spend time with his family, but rather perhaps he and his family are now some distance away, which means at times he would be otherwise unable to see/talk to them in person.

    I chat with my GF on MSN and webcam almost daily. On weekends when I can I drive 4h to see her. Neither one is exclusive of the other, but as she lives 4h away from me and goes to school, whereas I work here, weekday visits in-person don't really work out. No reason the grandparent poster couldn't be in a similar situation.

  25. Obligatory penny arcade link by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/12/31

    I've played games on various platforms with my wife since the day we met (WoW, Mario Kart, Quake, etc). She wasn't really into games before we met, but now she comes to LAN parties with me.

    However, I have a job, and she stays at home with the kids. She can play when they nap. All I can say is that there's some serious truth to that comic.

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  26. Gaming together by irablum · · Score: 1

    Our family has 5 WoW accounts in the house, plus my brother-n-law and his wife each have accounts, and another son outside the house has an account. We created a family guild and often are online at the same time. its been kind of an addiction but at least its one where we're all together.

    Sometimes its weird like going to your teenage kid and saying, "Yo, get your butt onto WoW so your Pally can tank for us in Scarlet Monastary." "But dad, I was talking to my girlfriend on the phone......" "C'mon, hurry up, your mom and I are waiting for you in Trisfal Glades"

    Ira