Slashdot Mirror


'Games as Porn' Bill Passes Utah House

The state bill which attempts to equate gaming with pornography has passed the vote in the Utah house of representatives. GameDailyBiz reports: "Even though there's still no evidence of a direct link between video game violence and acts of violence committed in real-life, Hogue suggested that playing violent games leads to 'automatic learning of aggressive behavior,' and that violent games have played a role in school shootings. 'Would these same kids have done this anyway without watching violent videos? Maybe not,' he said, referring to the Columbine massacre."

31 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. "Maybe not?" by Zardus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone should have gotten up and made a rebuttal of "Or maybe yes." and then there'd be a deadlock as the opposing side tries to come up with an actual argument.

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    1. Re:"Maybe not?" by pantropik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These idiots who think they can save the world by denying people the right to look at the "wrong" things would be comical if they didn't so often succeed in getting idiotic laws passed. Humans enjoy ritualized violence, whether it's playing tackle football, boxing, hunting, video games, movies ... that's not going to change until humans either evolve away from it or become extinct.

      Taking away access to this stuff in no way takes away the innate human desire for it, and pretending otherwise is just willful stupidity. Before kids had XBoxes they had cap guns. Before they had cap guns they had toy spears and sharp rocks. It's not the behaviors that have changed, just the tools and implementation. As for the Columbine kids, I'd argue that he's got it all wrong. The kids sought out and surrounded themselves with violent imagery because that's what spoke to their hearts and minds, in the same way another child might seek out beautiful landscape paintings or elegant progamming code or slapstick comedy or politics or religion or who knows what else. If he honestly thinks that some bright-eyed, angelic child with no evil or violence in her heart can pick up a copy of GTA and turn into a murderous freak, he's even stupider than I give him credit for already. I'd also argue that if they hadn't had access to violent imagery they'd have probably been more inclined to create their own (torturing animals, etc.).

      Just because kids are imitative enough to use what they've seen in games or movies as templates for their own acts of violent stupidity doesn't mean they wouldn't have come up with something else on their own if they hadn't had something to imitate. I love action movies, murder mysteries, violent video games. I've committed virtual murder who knows how many times and loved it. I still remember blowing bodies all to pieces in Soldier of Fortune, sniping brains all over the walls and gleefully mutilating corpses. But you know what else? The thought of gleefully or even accidentally hurting an actual person or animal is repulsive to me, just as it is to any healthy human being no matter how many slasher flicks they've watched or virtual corpses they've dismembered. The notion that the majority of us shouldn't be able to do a thing because a tiny, dysfunctional minority might not be able to handle it is absurd.

    2. Re:"Maybe not?" by BlastQuake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the same token, maybe Utah should ban football, or televised sports containing any body contact. Violence in sports likely has the same impact as violence in games, then again my opinion should be taken with a grain of salt. I an imagine what kind of uproar that would cause, "What do you mean we can't watch the superbowl?"

      --
      "What use is power to the Keeps of Balance?" -Disnt of Nightmare LpMud
    3. Re:"Maybe not?" by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The notion that the majority of us shouldn't be able to do a thing because a tiny, dysfunctional minority might not be able to handle it is absurd.

      First they came for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they went after the potheads, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a pothead. Next, they went after the protesters, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a protester. After that, they tried to crack down on unwholesome music, but I wasn't a musician so I said nothing. Now, they've gone after games and I have no excuse on which to base my arguments.

      (with apologies to Pastor Martin Niemöller.)

      And yes, I realize the seriousness of the original context... but I couldn't help mentioning the similarity.

      --

      Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  2. ban school by Mahou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would these same kids have done this anyway without being made to go to school? Maybe not.

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  3. Number of good things to come out of Utah: by IgLou · · Score: 2, Funny
    Still at zero... That's meant in jest for those that can't take a joke.

    Like this is a surprise, it's Utah which according to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah :
    Approximately 60% of state residents are adherents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    Tell me no one saw this coming.
    --

    Oops, how did this get here?
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Number of good things to come out of Utah: by rts008 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know how much "jest" it will take to erase all of the questions I have, but don't really want answered!

      To explain that, I had a contract job in Provo, and we stayed in the suburbs of Salt Lake City at a motel (hotel?-don't remember) and I still can't get past the brochure in the room we stayed at BRAGGING about SLC (Salt Lake City) being settled by 167 men, 8 women, 23 (I think it was 23- could be wrong, but I'm sure about the 167 men and 8 women), and mention of livestock that settled SLC. How did they come up with men having so many wives? How did that work with 167 men and 8 women- time shares? WTF??!!??

      Go ahead and mod me "off topic" and "flamebait"- my karma can stand it, but how can this *inbred* culture have anything mainstream to say to the rest of the USA that has any relevance?

      Apologies to those that had no choice in their birth, but that brochure still *scares* me when I actually think about it!

      BTW, the whole work experience there was like working in a foreign country that happened to use English as the "national language", and yes, I have worked in many diff countries- Utah was no big difference than those countries except for transportation issues (no customs to go through).

      I wish I could remember the exact motel/hotel we stayed at so I could document the specific brochure, but maybe someone has ran across this and can provide relevant links or sources. (My visit was in the late '90's...97-98 I think)

      Scary state, considering it is part of the USA.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  4. Yes, a whole new category of criminal by sauge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dreaded "gamer." Three kids go on a shooting spree and so the 1,000,000+ who play are all lining up at gun stores.

    This is a law brought to you by the people who want intelligent design taught in school.

    It also an example of why people are disgusted with legislators around the country.

  5. What about war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to start a big flame war or anything, but doesn't invading other countries kind of encourage aggressive behavior?

    It seems that it isn't a question of aggressive behavior per se, it is where the aggresive behavior comes from that matters. In other words it is bullshit.

  6. A Bold Positive Step by Shihar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is a bold and positive step. Unfortunately, I believe that they have left a loop hole that needs to be immediately covered. Namely, while we can protect our children from violent video games, there are still now laws in place to protect our children from violent books. There are literally thousands of mystery books out there teaching our children how to be perfect killers. There are thousands of books glorifying war, death conflict, and even sexual perversion. I think must act immediately to step up an American Censorship board to keep violent books out of the hands of our children. I believe that all books containing 'adult content' should be separated out from books safe for children. Further, schools should have an absolute ban on violent and mature books.

    If we don't act now, school shootings will continue to rise, the violent murders will continue to increase, and our children will continue to live shorter and shorter lives in this terrible and violent world.

    1. Re:A Bold Positive Step by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Worse yet, they might start reading The Holy Bible, with it's sordid tales of lust, murder, incest, homosexual rape, etc.... just imagine what kind of ideas they would get out of such obviously subversive literature!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:A Bold Positive Step by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It might be interesting to rewrite those more-sordid chunkc of the bible such that it's set as a completely modern tale, but without changing anything BUT the setting... and see how quickly it gets tagged as unwholesome, violent, pornographic, etc.

      Of course the people most in need of enlightenment would just be horrified by our "perversion of the holy word", and wouldn't learn a thing. :/

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Before everyone freaks out... by ChePibe · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. If you're not in Utah, don't worry. This isn't going to affect you. So pipe down already and focus on preventing it in your own backyard.

    2. If you are in Utah, don't worry. I'm in Utah now, and guess one of the two will happen:

    a. It won't pass the Senate, as legislative sessions here are remarkably short anyways (just a bill to get a little attention). It will simply die with time.

    b. If it does pass the Senate, my money is on a "pocket" veto, pretty much just ignoring the bill. The Utah senate this year is farily tied up as it is.

    In any case, here's the text for the bill and the ammendment for those interested. It'd be nice if the submitters included this information when they sent in an article on pending legislation.

    1. Re:Before everyone freaks out... by slycrel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thanks for the links, I hadn't found the actual legislation yet.

      I live in Utah and this is the first I've heard of this.

      The slashdot summary is a bit misleading. I found this nice sum-up description after following the "previous coverage" link in the article. You can also confirm this using the links the parent poster has supplied.

      "The bill states that "inappropriate violence" would include video games with material patently offensive to the prevailing standards in the adult community, as long as it didn't have "serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors." Those that legitimately used violence to further a game's plot (such as games based on historical wars) would be exempt, however."

      This appears to also only be for interactive video and video games after the ammendment, originally it was for just about any violent material.

      After reading up, I can understand (I think) their reasons why they are trying to pass this law. While they seem to have a reasonable basis, I can't think of any reasonable implementation that wouldn't be misused. Not that my opinion matters much.

      But then, Orrin Hatch actually is supposed to represent me, and I disagree with most of what he does nowadays. (And yes, I voted) Sucks to be me.

    2. Re:Before everyone freaks out... by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Yeah, but if you don't live in Utah, are you going to tell the people of Utah that they're not allowed nor entitled to censor themselves if they want to?

      As a citizen of the United States that still has a first amendment, yes, I'm quite prepared to tell some people of Utah that they can't censor other people in Utah. If one individual wants to censor themself (whatever that means) that's entirely different.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Before everyone freaks out... by B4L1STA · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the funny thing is the house and the senate here are in a stalemate. The house is refusing to pass any bill sponsored by a senator and vice versa. The session ends in a week... if the deadlock continues, NO bills at all are going to get passed and $300 million is going to go unspent (at least until the governor calls a special session).

  8. Well I Don't Know by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not going to say "video game = go on killing spree". However, what I am going to say is that when I went to high school in early to late 80's the idea of gun violence did not cross our mind. I do realize that not all high schools are equal and that some gun violence did exist.

    However, what disturbs me about many youth is that they do not think twice about getting a hand gun. I grew up in the country or cottage country to be exact and guns were common things. Though guns were used to go hunting for bear, deer or moose. I can't remember anybody in my circle in friends saying, "Hey look at this hand gun". It was more like, "Hey did you see the bear I shot!"

    What I want to say is that I think we should consider the message we are saying with shooter and violent games. I am not so sure it is totally innocent!

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:Well I Don't Know by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guns appear to have been a normal part of your life from childhood. You were raised around them, and were obviously trained in their proper use. (As were your peeers) You think that might have had some impact on how you and your peers viewed guns? Probably more of an impact than the lack of 'shooter' games?

      I'm suprised that people target games which feature gun violence, but ignore the glorified violence in other media. (Movies, pop music, etc)

  9. Games are now porn! by Kirby · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's super convenient. Now I only have one hobby!

    --
    -- Kate
  10. NO NO NO NO NO. by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Call this a knee-jerk reaction stemming from childhood wounds, but I beleive many school shootings don't happen becasue of violent video games. These kids were screwed up for other reasons. I blame bad parenting, either being abusive and / or negligent to their child. Next I blame the school administrations. I have been to seven different schools, and 5 of them all did the same thing. Say student A and his buddies start irritating student B. Administration tells studen B to ignore it. Student B will only ignore it so long before reacting. 99 times out of a 100, student B will get in trouble for reacting, but student A will get off with nothing. This pisses of Student B. Eventually studen B gets more and more pissed. Mabey we should see what's going on inside the schools?

  11. Surprising by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe this'll spur them to get around to cleaning up that little polygamy "problem" over there. May I present exhibit a: Google Results 1 - 100 of about 94,300 for mormon wife underaged

  12. This is stupid. by Dastardly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rep. Lorie Fowlke (R-Orem) pointed out that HB 257 is the most narrowly defined legislation of these kinds of violent games bills. "I think it is worth a try," she said. "Otherwise we give up and say the court will always determine our values."

    And, Dastardly said, "It is worth a try to keep these bills from being passed otherwise we give up and say the politicians will always determine our values."

    1. Re:This is stupid. by ACME+Septic · · Score: 2, Informative

      You want to know what's stupid? Lorie Fowlke wants to limit access to fake guns, while leaving open full access to real guns! (I think George Carlin had a joke about this.)

      FWIW, I am in favor of having access to both real and virtual guns. I just like to point out the lunacy of elected officials.

      Also, her page says elsewhere about "Family," "I will do all I can to pass and support legislation that protects the traditional family from government encroachment. I will fight for what is right against any government agency that uses its power inappropriately or illegally to interfere with the rights of the family."

      Like the rights to parent our children without government interference?

      Give me a fucking break.

  13. ban bullies by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would these same kids have done this anyway without being picked on daily at school? Maybe not.

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  14. Don't worry... by urbanriot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The "gaming generation" will be in power in about ten to twenty years and we can undo the damage done by these ignorant good old boys. Unfortunately, until then we're forced to suffer.

  15. Re:Score so far by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, repealing the 2nd ammendment and banning firearms would be death at the polls

    Aye, because firearms bans are working so well elsewhere.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  16. I am actually against gun control laws by superwiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But it does seem hypocrical to ban the games which might have precipitated the shooting and to allow semi-automatic weapons that definately assisted in the shooting. How can you ban games that let people shoot in fantasy but not the weapons that let people shoot in reality?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  17. What about the availability of firearms? by SharkyTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Would these same kids have done this anyway without watching violent videos? Maybe not,' he said, referring to the Columbine massacre." What a moron. Would they have done this if guns were illegal and therefore much harder to get? Probably not!

    --
    Give us this day our garlic bread and lead us not into vegetarianism but deliver us some pizza.
  18. I don't like Mondays by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.snopes.com/music/songs/mondays.asp

    There were school shootings long before video games started to take off, and long before the advent of the kind of graphic ultraviolence that this bill targets....

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  19. I can't help it. I stomp winged turtles on sight by beoswulf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goddamn Mario. It's not my fault. Blame my parents.
    Also whenever I'm in a big box store I get the urge to run through the aisles, eating fruit off the floor and dodging obese people in brightly colored mumus

  20. (Games = porn) = (ban on porn = extinction)? by gweihir · · Score: 2, Funny

    If games are what causes violence, then porn must surely be what causes people to have sex?

    If this is true, then only people watching porn can reproduce. Hence if porn is banned, there
    will be no sex and no next generation anymore.

    The other way round, in order to ensure reproduction in the developed countries, free,
    high-quality porn should be available to everybody. Since games = porn, the same should
    be true for games.... I think I like this law!

    I also have a nagging suspicion: Do all these overpopulated 3rd world countries have better
    and more porn than we do?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.