Slashdot Mirror


Testing Cell Phone Radiation on Humans

Palm Addict writes "News.com reports that Finland's radiation watchdog is to study the effects of mobile phones on human proteins by direct tests on people's skin. From the article: 'A pilot study, to be conducted next week, will expose a small area of skin on volunteers' arms to cell phone radiation for the duration of a long phone call, or for one hour, research professor Dariusz Leszczynski said on Friday.'"

12 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds good, but... by SlashThat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not test it on living human cells separated from living humans? That way no one would catch cancer as a result of this research, and it may even be easier to study (at least some of) the effects.

    --
    1's and 0's should be free.
  2. What they'll find by john83 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They'll discover that the phones have a small heating effect, 1 C, as required by a)basic phystics and b)regulations. They will conclude whatever they have already assumed, i.e. that this is dangerous/not dangerous, without any actual experimentation having been done on that particular question.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  3. Radiation levels by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Informative

    CNET has another article showing the radiation levels of certain cell phones.

    Within the US models listed, Motorola has the highest with its Motorola V120c, and the lowest goes to the Audiovox PPC66001.
    Maybe people will want to check this chart before buying a new cell phone? Maybe not.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  4. Why arm skin? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Testing arm skin isn't all that practical, who keeps a cell phone there?

    They should find out how the radiation affects the two bodily areas my phone is usually found, which coincidentally are the two areas I'm most worried about irradiating.

    1. Re:Why arm skin? by suwain_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's an awfully interesting place for a phone. I usually keep mine in my pocket.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  5. This is silly by radiumhahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's non-ionizing radiation.... people have been putting these things by their heads for hours on a daily basis... show me one potential case of burn via cell signal.

  6. More interesting than the test itself by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...would be the reaction of the world if these things really do cause cancer. Would we just deal with the risk? Rebuild all the towers to use frequencies that don't penetrate human skin? Give up cell phones altogether? Would insurance companies hike your rates if you use a cellphone?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:More interesting than the test itself by Expert+Determination · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I know it does more than they say it does. Hell my mom used to get migraines from drinking it, stopped drinking it, migraines gone.
      And I know people who get horribly sick from eating wheat products. Does that mean wheat is dangerous? Generalising from a sample size of one is far more dangerous that drinking diet soda.
      --
      "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  7. Re:This reminds me of mobile cooking by code65536 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's an urban legend that was posted some time ago either at /. or digg, and plenty of people showed that it was simply not possible. For one, even at maximum output and perfect cooking efficiency, the amount of energy emitted simply won't even come close to being enough.

  8. This is dumb by liliafan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have been using cellphones for years and never had any kind of a problem, I find them most useful, for example the third eye above my right ear helps get a better view when driving and the second head sprouting off my hip gives me someone to talk to. Heh radiation altering cells what a load of rubbish and my talking second head agrees.

    --
    GeekServ Unix Consulting Services (http://www.geekserv.com)
  9. Anyone else? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is anyone else picturing the Verizon guy in a lab coat standing over test subjects and repeating "Do you have cancer now? Good!"?

  10. AHHHHHHHHH! by agentcdog · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK so I did an experiment using a scintillation counter in my physics lab. When you turn the machine on you got lots of hits (dozens per second) from background radiation. Then I stuck my phone up against it... nothing happened. The radiation from a phone is too weak to register. So if you are even remotely worried by cell phones, you should find yourself a big dirt hole way underground then line it with aluminum foil.
    Seriously though, this is a reply that I made the the last rediculous artlice about cell-phone cancer:
    *Rolling Eyes* The people who study these things I think just make up dumb studies so that they can get grant money. There are three ways in which EM radiation (what cell phones use) can be dangerous, in order of severity: 1. Radiation that has the resonant frequency of molecular bonds can give a LOT of energy to the molecules that make us up. That's how a microwave oven works. The EM waves have the same frequency as the resonant frequency for water molecules.
    2. Radiation can kick off electrons (beta particles) or protons (alpha particles). If an element loses an electron it becomes more volatile. If an element in our DNA loses a proton it can change the DNA. That's why strong radiation can cause cancer.
    3. Radiation can generally heat us up.
    Cell phone radiation is not even strong enough to kick off an electron unless it is VERY loosely bound. It has no chance of kicking off a proton.
    Bottom line: Unless you feel your brain start cooking (the sun is WAY more likely to cook your brain), don't worry.

    --
    If I understand Dirac correctly, his meaning is this: there is no God, and Dirac is his Prophet. -Pauli