Slashdot Mirror


Ars Technica Reviews Controller Keyboard

phaedo00 writes "Ars Technica has reviewed the AlphaGrip AG-5 handheld keyboard and mouse. From the article: 'After lots of research and five revisions, the perfectionists at AlphaGrip finally decided that they had a product worthy of marketing, and they released the long awaited AG-5. Although the AG-5 looks strange and intimidating, it is a unique and highly innovative product that deserves consideration, particularly by mobile computing enthusiasts. The AG-5 interfaces with computers via a single removable USB cable. It uses a simple chord-like keyboarding model and an integrated trackball to provide complete keyboard and mouse functionality in a unique form factor that looks a bit like a console gaming controller.'"

38 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Cool.. So.. by Jupix · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it get you banned in WoW? :P

    1. Re:Cool.. So.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Avast, ye swab perhaps you'd rather read about Arrrrs Technica's review of a keyboard

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Cool.. So.. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      does it get you banned in WoW? :P

      And I nominate Jupix for the next slashdot cliché!

      Votes please?

    3. Re:Cool.. So.. by rich_r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Typical. The moment I give away my last mod point is the moment at which I end up choking on my coffee....

    4. Re:Cool.. So.. by eclarkso · · Score: 2, Informative
      It requires two hands like a normal keyboard. So, um, where's the advance? Show me an affordable one that I can use with one hand, and I'll buy it.
      The Twiddler is a one-handed chording keyboard that's ~$200.
  2. Wha huh? by jmartens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even from a person who has taught himself how to use dvorak ... that looks like a nightmare.

    --
    Now that's a death ray!
    1. Re:Wha huh? by GrievousMistake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does, doesn't it? Looks can be deceiving, though. TFA claims 45 wpm after a week, with a month as a more typical learning period.
      It looks fine for simple text input, actually, and maybe gaming, but I have my reservations against using this thing for Vi... I hate remapping the keys for anything more complex than a FPS, so configuring each application to avoid keys that are hard to press simultaneously sounds less than tempting. (Does anybody else here use default vim mappings with the dvorak layout, or am I just crazy?)
      If all I were doing with my computer was hanging around on Slashdot all day, I'd go for it.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  3. I'm not sure this is the answer by RunFatBoy.net · · Score: 4, Informative

    While most mobile users would like to have something more compact, is it really necessary to sacrafice teh productivity of a standard keyboard in order to gain a convenient, compact form factor?

    I like the promise that the virtual keyboards have (e.g. http://www.virtualdevices.net/ ). While functionly they have some limitations right now (e.g. having to hold your fingers about the infrared keys), over time they are going to get better. At least this solution you could have a full range keyboard without having to lug it around.

    -- Jim http://www.runfatboy.net/

    1. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by harrkev · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try doing that while riding on a train, or as a passenger in a car. That invention that you pointed to ONLY works if you have a table or other flat surface in fron of you. And if you type too long on a table, your hands would likely start hurting.

      -- Now, on to other things --
      I am the proud owner of an Alphagrip. I have only spend a couple of hours with it so far, but I have an important comment that was not mentioned on TFA...

      I am a large guy. I am over six feet tall -- and I have large hands.

      I find the Alphagrip to be uncomfortable because it was designed for use by smaller hands. When I am holding it to comfortably reach the back keys, my fingers are in the wrong position to easily use the front keys. Similarly, if I can use the front keys, I have difficulty with the back keys.

      I am also not entirely sure how to hold this thing either. If it was bigger, I could press my palms against the side. However, as it is, I have to use my fingertips to hold it, which is awkward because those same fingertips are always over one button or another. If you press to hard then you get extra characters that you don't want.

      The Alphagrip seems like it has the posibility to be rather nice if it can fit you. But if you have large hands, you might want to reconsider until they make the AG-6.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Actually...I think the only MAJOR upgrade to the keyboard,is to do away with it totally...and have the computer somehow be connected to read your thoughts...

      Of course, this will have some drawbacks, such as when your boss walks into your office, and you forget to turn off the mindreader....and he sees over and over on the screen behind you...

      ...what a tool.

      ...what a tool.

      ...what a tool.

      ...hehehe...I boned his wife at the Xmas party while he was passed out...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Informative

      is it really necessary to sacrafice teh productivity of a standard keyboard in order to gain a convenient, compact form factor?

      Uhmm.... yeah, right. Like the standard keyboard is worth more than a dime-a-dozen.

      I'm serious: I treated myself with a Kinesis Ergo Elan (http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/elan.htm), and I'm really glad I did--it's a really pleasant keyboard to work with. I only noticed when I first used a standard keyboard after adapting to using the Ergo Elan--not only did it feel uncomfortable, it felt painful. I'm serious--and it wasn't just because I had adjusted to something different (if it were, I should have felt pain when switching to Ergo Elan, something I did not). Also, one thing that completely confounds me is why modern keyboards still have stagger--it's just being mindlessly carried along from the 1890's up until today (sure, it was reasonable due to mechanical constraints on typewriters; newsflash: computer keyboards isn't a new invention).

      (End of rant about the sad state keyboard design is in these days)

      Actually, I think the AlphaGrip might be better than a (physical) keyboard layout designed for typewriters. I'm open to the possibility that I might be wrong (in general I dislike small keyboards, but this one might have been done well).

      I hope you don't argue that the usefulness of the standard keyboard layout is high just because it's a standard; if that was true, Windows 95 was once a good OS, and Bush was a good president (at election time, he was the "standard" choice).

      Also, the keyboard permutation matters. I'll replay this anecdote (I'm not playing any role, and I can't remember who participates in it, and I'm not even sure I got the phrases exactly right, or that I've go the gender information right, but... oh well, someone once said something to the effect of...):

      Alice: "Excuse me. If you don't mind me asking, are you using that alternative keyboard layout?"

      Bob:: "Yes--it's called Dvorak. How could you tell?"

      Alice: "Your fingers aren't moving."

      I like the promise that the virtual keyboards have
      It's not a bad idea (at all), but it's amazing that they haven't shuffled the keys around (okay, so I was almost done ranting about keyboard design): it must be almost trivial to do--all there is to it is basically detect surface contact in a different polygon.

    4. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by segphault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm also an AlphaGrip owner, and I'm six feet five inches also with very large hands. If I keep my hands loosely wrapped around the the device (with my hands out rather than with my palms firmly against the grips) and I hold it lightly against my stomach, I don't have to tightly grip the bottom part of the device. I experimented with a couple of different hand positions, and I found that holding it like that provided the best balance of comfort and control. If you hold it that way too you probably wont get that problem.

  4. Real geeks won't use it by Dekortage · · Score: 3, Funny

    This would eliminate the only exercise they get (typing!). Besides, it requires TWO HANDS.

    Also, from the article: If we are successful, the AG-5 will turn out to be just a glimpse of the future of desk-free computing. Desk-free? Where am I going to put my coffee cup?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Real geeks won't use it by mrsev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your two hands comment is actually very correct. This many provide a useful tool for people who type alot of the time in a "conventional" manner but most of the time I am doing other things with one of my hands (I can predict the replies to this part of my comment). I like to eat, drink, hold up a piece of paper or hold one of my kids on my lap. Plus my kids will be pissed that it does not seem to be able fit their hands very well.

      On the whole a good idea and a great device for alot of people but not for me.

  5. But what I want to know... by solarbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Is how is it going to effect people with RSI. Having something which looks relativly heavy and having to hold it up for a longish period at a time isn't going to be good for your wrists (not that a keyboard is much better tbh)

    --
    SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
  6. No Wireless/Bluetooth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that without wireless support via Bluetooth (not the USB wireless that they promise real soon now), this keyboard/controller's usefulness is decreased quite a bit.

    I might be open to switching to an alternate input device, but only if I'll be able to use it with my other devices (PDA, cell phone, etc.)

    Also, I fear my vi productivity will decrease dramatically with this device...

  7. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A keyboard is letters on buttons...

  8. Re:Well.... by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're current keyboard also has letters on buttons.....or keys, as someone might call them.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  9. Engelbart Chord Keyset by daddyrief · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That thing looks like a beast.

    This is Offtopic, but maybe someone here would know...

    I've been looking to get a chord keyset similar to the 5-key style that Engelbart created. Picture. I vaguely remember seeing one or two products when i looked a few months back, but nowhere could i find a purchase link.

    I guess the question is: does anyone know where i could buy a chord keyset? Maybe some uber-nerdy slashdotter has one laying around i can buy?

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Engelbart Chord Keyset by burris · · Score: 2, Informative

      BAT Keyboard I used these for a while but gave them up in favor of a dvorak kinesis contour. They are great if you do a lot of CAD, diagramming, or anything else that requires lots of mousing and typing since you can keep one hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse. I suppose they would be awesome for games but I'm not much of a gamer.

      Downsides: The idiots STILL have not figured out how to generate the Mac command key and that is a large reason why I gave them up. The travel of the keys is too far so you hands bounce too much, causing undue stress. Less importantly, I couldn't really get over 50wpm, though that means I could type at 25wpm with one hand. The firmware is also somewhat buggy.

      Learning the letters is easy. Symbols are harder. Getting a smooth alternating left/right technique was very hard for me.

    2. Re:Engelbart Chord Keyset by Yojimbo-San · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cykey http://www.bellaire.demon.co.uk/newcykey.htm

      I have one here, it's a bit of a pain with IR connection, but once you have the receiver set up it works fine.

      The chording style they use here took me literally an hour to learn ~22 letters of the alphabet on, which matched the claim on the manual :-)

      I still have their Excellent 1990 PDA, the AgendA http://www.bellaire.demon.co.uk/cykey.htm

      --
      Quick wafting zephyrs vex bold Jim
  10. ICK by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had to learn the Handeykey Twiddler for my foray into the world of wearable computing and it was a PITA to learn. But it at least let me do it one handed and at a somewhat decent rate. This thing looks really awkward to use no matter what you do.

    None of these alternative keybards have any real benefits. The twiddler was close as you could type while walking down the street or listening during a class without getting everyone's attention. This thing will get professors glaring at you.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. A snowball's chance. by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chording keyboards hae been since the invention of the stenotype machine in the late 1800s, enabling those willing to master what the Ars Technica article calls a "steep learning curve" to attain speeds of 225 wpm or about three times the speed of a comparably skilled typist.

    They were an integral part of Engelbart's conception--the mouse was intended for use with a five-key chording keyboard.

    There is nothing about them that is very difficult or expensive to manufacture. (In fact, common sense says that all things being equal a device with a dozen or so buttons ought to cost less than one with a hundred).

    This one must be about the tenth that's made it to the point of being manufactured and sold to the general PC-using public, several marketed at the height of concern about RSI with reasonable evidence that they would be less stressful to use than conventional keyboards.

    None of 'em have ever come close to catching on.

    Chalk up chording keyboards with leap-week calendars or decimal time or the Single Tax. Ain't gonna happen.

    1. Re:A snowball's chance. by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you had read the article you would see this isn't a chording keyboard, infact the button placements are almost identical to that of qwerty except its wrapped around a control pad. The fingers you use to type qwerty are the same fingers you use to type with this.

  12. Written by an android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can consistently achieve about 45 words per minute with the AG-5 (vs. 65wpm on a traditional keyboard), and I think that with more experience I could probably exceed 50. My typing speed on the AG-5 is apparently not indicative of the average user experience. I suppose my pedantically compulsive nature and capacity for data retention made it easier for me to assimilate the layout.


    This just in: The AG-5 is the 'keyboard' of choice for robots, androids, and borg the world over!
  13. Looks good for VR by bigpat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using the headtracking on my Z800 to full effect has been a challenge, since I have been largely stuck using the keyboard for FPS gaming. But this thing could really give me some extra freedom of movement. Just need a long enough USB cable and I should be able to manage the cables well enough to do a few 360 degree turns without getting too tangled.

    I tried a wireless programmable controller, but the batteries didn't last very long and their seemed to be some latency. This thing should provide all the keyboard commands you could ever need.

  14. Re:Well.... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you call a device that has numbers and letters on it and its use is primarily for input into a machine.

    I call that the telephone.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  15. Re:Well.... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except it doesn't really look like a keyboard... more like a gamepad with a zillion buttons + trackball.

    I only point this out because the /. summary doesn't come right out and say it.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  16. They aren't guilty by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Read the first article again. They said it was invented to reduce mechanical failure (no word about typing speed), which is exactly what that article states it was for.

  17. I bought One...My thoughts... by haplo21112 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got one of these controllers. I have played with it a little its definately only for those that can seriously learn to touch type. Since many of the buttons are not at all in sight you really have to learn the keyboard. Over all its comfortable, but I feel that more than one size would have been better. The shipping model is more suitable for the average hand. A smaller hand could problay learn to work with it. My medium-large hands are pretty much at the limit of comfortable use. If you have large hands the buttons are not going to be anyplace near your finger tips.

    The keyboard makes extensive use of shift buttons to accomplish things. Get used to some finger acrobatics. I still have not quite got the hang of Control-Alt-Delete on this thing.

    The Built in Mouse....

    Personally this is the one true downfall in my opinion. The roller ball is WAY to small, and its far far far to slow it takes me far far to many rolls over the ball to get the mouse around even a 1024/768 acreen, never mind the 1280/1024 I typically run at. The performance in games (The reason I originally thought this might be a useful product) is basically worthless at this point. I went so far as to hack the registry to increase the mouse responsiveness to the maximum allowable, a setting you can't even do in the crontrol panel applet. The mouse still isn't acceptably responsive. In fact it seemed barley changed on the AG-5 despite the fact that another mouse on the same machine now zips the cursor accross the machine so fast you have to take a second after the movement to find it again.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  18. Re:stop propogating myths by tyme · · Score: 5, Informative
    demon411 wrote:
    "In 1874 a company called Sholes and Glidden developed the QWERTY keyboard layout for their typewriters in order to decrease the frequency of mechanical failure."

    Stop Propogating Myths


    What are you talking about? According an article referenced from your first link:
    The first typewriter had its letters on the end of rods called "typebars." The typebars hung in a circle. The roller which held the paper sat over this circle, and when a key was pressed, a typebar would swing up to hit the paper from underneath. If two typebars were near each other in the circle, they would tend to clash into each other when typed in succession. So, Sholes figured he had to take the most common letter pairs such as "TH" and make sure their typebars hung at safe distances.

    He did this using a study of letter-pair frequency prepared by educator Amos Densmore, brother of James Densmore, who was Sholes' chief financial backer. The QWERTY keyboard itself was determined by the existing mechanical linkages of the typebars inside the machine to the keys on the outside. Sholes' solution did not eliminate the problem completely, but it was greatly reduced.

    The keyboard arrangement was considered important enough to be included on Sholes' patent granted in 1878 (see drawing), some years after the machine was into production. QWERTY's effect, by reducing those annoying clashes, was to speed up typing rather than slow it down.


    This indicates that the QWERTY layout is a direct result of the inventor attempting to prevent mechanical jams in the device. The submitter of the article wrote:
    In 1874 a company called Sholes and Glidden developed the QWERTY keyboard layout for their typewriters in order to decrease the frequency of mechanical failure.

    The myth to which you are alluding, however, is that Sholes developed the QWERTY layout to decrease the speed of typists (admittedly, to prevent the same jamming of typebars), when, in fact, the QWERTY layout acheived exactly the opposite effect (it allowed typists to type faster because jamming was less likely). The submitter is not claiming that Sholes was trying to slow down the typists (a myth) but that he was trying to reduce typebar jams (the truth).
    --
    just a ghost in the machine.
  19. May not be ergonomic by Tihstae · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the website http://www.alphagrips.com/store/shopping.html

    "The AlphaGrip may not be ergonomic. The company has not conducted the requisite studies to make that determination."

  20. has voice recognition been abandoned? by ErisCalmsme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some reason it seems to me that using a device other than microphone is too much... why work so hard to go from one handheld device to another? I'm not advocating for brain implants (the ultimate in hands free computing), but voice control is a nice medium. Hands free + surgery free ;) Complex key combos can be shortened to a word or two... no more RSI... plus it frees up both hands............

    --
    Chaos is Divine *
  21. No good if you don't have all your fingers by Tech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with all of these chorded keyboard replacements - including this one - is that they are mostly useless for anyone with fewer than five working fingers [*] on each hand, either accidentally or from birth. And a person with the normal allocation of fingers who temporarily loses use of one, due to an injury for example, would have to revert to the standard keyboard which, happily, is still entirely functional - albeit slower. I would be very interested to see more designs of alternative input devices that can accommodate temporary and permanent disabilities.

    [*] Ignoring the thumb-vs-finger debate.

  22. Who, specifically, is this for? by Gulik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not being sarcastic here -- I'm honestly not sure what group of users is being targetted here. It seems that the only people who might find this useful are people who don't have a flat surface in front of them to rest a keyboard on. That might be laptop users, but if there's nowhere to rest the laptop, you can't use it anyway -- and while it can be argued that typing on the laptop while it's sitting on your lap is uncomfortable, I'm not sure balancing the laptop using only your knees while holding this thing over it is going to be any better. So, if not laptop users, then PDA users -- except this thing is larger than most of the PDAs commonly in use. Tablet users walking around the shop floor? If you're using both hands to hold the controller, what's holding up the tablet?

    This is an honest question: who is this thing for?

  23. Console controllers by Jagasian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really wish that somebody would make a console controller similar to the Xbox 360 controller, with the right analog stick replaced by a trackball. Using an analog stick for moving a pointer or your player's view in a first-person shooter is just terrible. Having a trackball would be much better for such actions. Also, with such a change, the controller would have 3 direction controls: D-pad, analog stick, and trackball. Each have proven themselves to be useful for certain game tasks, so why not make them all available at the same time?

  24. Why not a Nintendo Revolution style mouse? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I really like this device, except for the mouse. That trackball seems worthless. Even if the sensitivity issues were solved, it still occupies a thumb, which is already an overemployed digit with all the chords it needs to participate in. Also, I have no hope that a thumb-controlled wheel could be both fast and accurate enough to use in a game.

    But we already have a solution: the Nintendo Revolution!

    The idea is simple: you move the mouse cursor through tilting the device. It requires no extra buttons and is perfectly natural and intuitive, since you're already holding the thing in the air. Basically, it would be a pointing device that you could really point with. Finally, you could mouse around without interrupting your typing! There would be all sorts of ways the device could detect its orientation. I'm not sure which method will be best, though the Nintendo Revolution controller will probably provide us with good clues. So why not build the innards of the Revolution controller inside of this keyboard? Apart from being useful for living room applications, it would just be awesome for games! Consider for example a game like GTA where you turn the car's steering wheel by tilting the controller!

    If these guys don't build that in, I hope someone else does. Hell, I'd pay $200 for a wireless tilt-driven one of these (that fits large hands).

  25. Re:Well.... by Lord+Laraby · · Score: 2, Funny


    I might call it an Alphanumeric Glyph-based Human Interface Peripheral Device. Or an "Anghip" device... if it hadn't already been named, that is.
    Or an "Anguhip" for Alphanumeric glyph-based USB human interface peripheral.

    Too bad, though. It might sound cooler than "keyboard".

    English Alphanumeric Glyph-based Loader Entry (or 'eagle') HID device????

    L @ L

    --
    Don't quote me on this...